Abstract

The South Africa Enterprise Survey was conducted between January and December 2007. Data from 1057 establishments in private manufacturing and services sectors were analyzed. The sample included enterprises with more than four employees (937 companies) as well as micro firms, establishments with less than 5 workers, (120 observations). The survey targeted establishments in Johannesburg, Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Durban.

The objective of the survey is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector as well as to help in building a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time, thus allowing, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country’s business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents’ opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance. The mode of data collection is face-to-face interviews.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

Universe

The whole population, or the universe, covered in the Enterprise Surveys is the non-agricultural economy. It comprises: all manufacturing sectors according to the ISIC Revision 3.1 group classification (group D), construction sector (group F), services sector (groups G and H), and transport, storage, and communications sector (group I). Note that this population definition excludes the following sectors: financial intermediation (group J), real estate and renting activities (group K, except sub-sector 72, IT, which was added to the population under study), and all public or utilities sectors.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The South Africa Enterprise Survey 2007 included enterprises with more than four employees as well as micro establishments, firms with less than five workers. There are 120 micro establishments in the sample.

The sample for enterprises with more than four employees was designed using stratified random sampling with strata defined by region, sector and firm size.

Establishments located in Johannesburg, Cape Town, Port Elizabeth and Durban were interviewed.

Following the ISIC (revision 3.1) classification, the following industries were targeted: all manufacturing sectors (group D), construction (group F), retail and wholesale services (subgroups 52 and 51 of group G), hotels and restaurants (group H), transport, storage, and communications (group I), and computer and related activities (sub-group 72 of group K). For establishments with five or more full-time permanent paid employees, this universe was stratified according to the following categories of industry: 1. Manufacturing: Food and Beverages (Group D, sub-group 15), Machinery and Equipment (Group D, sub-group 29), Electrical Machinery and Equipment (Group D, sub-group 31); 2. Manufacturing: Textiles (Group D, sub-group 17), Garment (Group D, sub-group 18), Leather and Footwear (Group D, sub-group 19), Paper and Paper Products (Group D, sub-group 21), Printing and Publishing (Group D, sub-group 22); 3. Manufacturing: Non-Metallic Mineral Products (Group D, sub-group 26), Basic Metals (Group D, sub-group 27), Fabricated Metal Products (Group D, sub-group 28); 4. Manufacturing: Wood and Wood Products (Group D, sub-group 20), Furniture (Group D, sub-group 36) 5. Manufacturing: Refined Petroleum Products (Group D, sub-group 23), Chemical Products (Group D, sub-group 24), Rubber and Plastics (Group D, sub-group 25) 6. Retail Trade: (Group G, sub-group 52); 7. Rest of the universe, including: • Other Manufacturing (Group D excluding sub-groups in strata 1-5); • Construction (Group F); • Wholesale trade (Group G, sub-group 51); • Hotels, bars and restaurants (Group H); • Transportation, storage and communications (Group I); • Computer related activities (Group K, sub-group 72).

Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition used for the Enterprise Surveys: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers.

The implementing agency (EEC Canada) was unable to obtain a satisfactory sample frame from South African statistical agency (STASA) or its Department of Revenue. The best alternative solution was a list obtained from the Department of Trade and Industry Companies and Intellectual Property Registration Office (CIPRO), which contained about 800000 establishments when delineating in-scope cities and industries, but which had incomplete firm characteristics necessary for stratification purposes (e.g. contact information, size). In order to determine the sample frame, EEC Canada randomly drew 9550 units and contacted them.

In South Africa, the survey included panel data collected from establishments surveyed in the 2003 Investment Climate Survey (ICS) of South Africa. That survey included establishments in the manufacturing and the rest of universe strata, distributed across Gauteng (Johannesburg), KwaZulu Natal (Durban), Western Cape (Cape Town) and Eastern Cape (Port Elizabeth) provinces.

In order to collect the largest possible set of panel data, an attempt was made to contact and survey valid establishments (579) in the panel list provided which was part of the Enterprise Survey's scope. Of the 716 establishments provided to EEC Canada from those surveyed in 2003, there were 35 doubles, 8 out-of-scope, 89 excluded from this survey by The World Bank to avoid over representing Construction in a single Residual stratum, and 5 with undefined ISIC codes. This left a total potential of 579 panel establishments. EEC Canada surveyed 231 panel establishments or 40% of the total potential panels without eliminating those establishments which had closed. Once eliminated, this percentage coverage exceeded 55%. Given the non-random nature of panel establishment selection, these establishments are not allocated probability weights in the final dataset.

In this survey, the micro establishment stratum covers all establishments of the targeted categories of economic activity with less than 5 employees located in Johannesburg. The implementing agency selected an aerial sampling approach to estimate the population of establishments and select the sample in this stratum for all states of the survey.

First, to randomly select individual micro establishments for surveying, the following procedure was followed: i) select districts and specific zones of each district where there was a high concentration of micro establishments; ii) count all micro establishments in these specific zones; iii) based on this count, create a virtual list and select establishments at random from that virtual list; and iv) based on the ratio between the number selected in each specific zone and the total population in that zone, create and apply a skip rule for selecting establishments in that zone.

The districts and the specific zones were selected at first according to local sources. The EEC team then went in the field to verify the sources and to count micro establishments. Once the count for each zone was completed, the numbers were sent back to EEC head office in Montreal.

At the head office, the count by zone was converted into one list of sequential numbers for the whole survey region, and a computer program performed a random selection of the determined number of establishments from the list. Then, based on the number that the computer selected in each specific zone, a skip rule was defined to select micro establishments to survey in that zone. The skip rule for each zone was sent back to the EEC field team.

In Johannesburg, enumerators were sent to each zone with instructions how to apply the skip rule defined for that zone as well as how to select replacements in the event of a refusal or other cause of non-participation.

For complete information about sampling methodology, refusal rate and weighting please review "South Africa Enterprise Survey 2007 Implementation Report" in "Technical Documents" folder.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The current survey instruments are available: - Core Questionnaire + Manufacturing Module [ISIC Rev.3.1: 15-37] - Core Questionnaire + Retail Module [ISIC Rev.3.1: 52] - Core Questionnaire [ISIC Rev.3.1: 45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, 72] - Micro

Abstract

In 1990 the Central Statistical Service of South Africa sponsored a household expenditure survey in a sub-set of households in 12 major metro/urban areas in the country. The aim of the survey was to obtain data on income and expenditure patterns of South African households on which the Consumer Price Index (CPS) and various other economic indicators could be based. The survey was conducted by Markdata, the fieldwork arm of the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC). All population groups were enumerated but this dataset does not contain data files for the "white" population group.

Geographic coverage

The IES 1990 only collected data on expenditure from the 12 largest urban areas in the country, leaving out buying patters in small towns and rural areas. Areas enumerated were: Cape Peninsula, Port Elizabeth- Uitenhage, East London, Kimberley, Pietermaritz burg, Durban, Pretoria, Johannesburg, Witwatersrand (excl Jhb), Klerksdorp, Vaal Triangle, Orange Free State-Gold Fields, Bloemfontein.

Analysis unit

Households and individuals

Universe

The survey covered all household members in the selected areas

Kind of data

Sample survey data

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Two survey instruments were provided in the IES 1990: A detailed "long" questionnaire and a "short" questionnaire without detailed classification of expenditure items. The "short" questionnaire was completed by two out of three households enumerated. The "short" and "long" questionnaires are identified separately in the variable q_type. "Long" questionnaires are indicated as questionnaire = 1 and "short' questionnaires as questionnaire = 2.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) across South Africa of Galeorhinus galeus based on mtDNA ND2 sequence and microsatellite data.