Powell Industries reported $4.38M in Interest Expense on Debt for its fiscal quarter ending in September of 2024. Data for Powell Industries | POWL - Interest Expense On Debt including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

This dataset tracks annual total expenditure from 1990 to 2021 for Powell County School District

Powell Industries pre-paid expenses from 2010 to 2025. Pre-paid expenses can be defined as a current asset created by prepayment of costs and expenses for which the benefits will occur at a future date.

Powell Industries reported $21.48M in Selling and Administration Expenses for its fiscal quarter ending in December of 2024. Data for Powell Industries | POWL - Selling And Administration Expenses including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

This dataset tracks annual average expenditure per student from 1995 to 2021 for Powell County School District

Powell Industries reported $496.33M in Operating Expenses for its fiscal quarter ending in December of 2024. Data for Powell Industries | POWL - Operating Expenses including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

This collection holds the supplementary data for Stream flow and Losses of the Colorado River in the Southern Colorado Plateau reported in Center for Colorado River Studies, Future of the Colorado River Project. This study analyzed the uncertainty in quantifying stream flow and losses of the Colorado River in the southern Colorado Plateau, including Lake Powell, the Grand Canyon, and Lake Mead. This collection has been developed to provide access to and preserve the data used in this study, in the interests of transparency and reproducibility of this work.

Powell Industries free cash flow from 2010 to 2025. Free cash flow can be defined as a measure of financial performance calculated as operating cash flow minus capital expenditures.

Powell Industries operating income from 2010 to 2025. Operating income can be defined as income after operating expenses have been deducted and before interest payments and taxes have been deducted.

Steady low reservoir releases increase downstream primary and aquatic invertebrate (bugs) production. These releases also reduce hydropeaking value, raise costs for hydropower customers, and reduce funds to maintain infrastructure and repay loans. This study quantifies the win-lose tradeoff between hydropeaking value and days per month of steady low releases at Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. We estimate win-lose tradeoffs for monthly release volumes of 0.71 to 0.95 million acre-feet from March to October 2018 and 0 to 31 days. Conservative estimates indicate that steady low releases on eight weekend days per summer month in 2018 reduced monthly hydropeaking value by $430,000 to $850,000. We used results to design a financial instrument that gives ecosystem managers a budget to choose days of steady low releases and compensate hydropower producers for lost value. One option to reduce costs is shifting days of steady low releases to spring/fall months. Next steps include discussing the proposed instrument with more U.S. Federal agencies, conducting more flow experiments, and monitoring how timing and more steady low flow days per month affect bug production. Managers may extend to other experimental releases that mobilize sediment, build sand bars, or disadvantage non-native fish.

This resource contains the following items:

• README.md - Markdown file with documentation for this resource including directions to reproduce results in the manuscript
• GCD_BugFlowExperiment-main - Folder with sub-folders that contain the data, models, and code to reproduce figures, tables, and results in the manuscript.
• Final_Draft_JHI_2025.pdf -- PDF document with the up-to-date manuscript for the work.
• Rind and Rosenberg_2025_Supplementary.pdf --PDF document with supplementary information for the manuscript.
• Rosenberg-BugsPayForSteadyFlows-AprilAMP.pptx - Power point presentation with overview of work presented at April 12/13, 2023 meeting of the Technical Work Group (TWG) of Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCD-AMP).
• KeyFeedbackFromTechnicalWorkGroup-April12-2023.docx - Key feedback from presentation to GCD-AMP Technical Work Group on April 12, 2023.

Reproducibility: Bhupinderjeet Singh and Philip Moffatt at Washington State University, USA downloaded the materials and reproduced all figures and tables.

Updates: We encourage users to visit our GitHub repository (https://github.com/moazzamalirind/GCD_BugFlowExperiment.git) for the latest updates and extended project details.

Medical care represents an important component of workers' compensation benefits with the potential to improve health and post- injury labor outcomes, but little is known about the relationship between medical care spending and the labor outcomes of injured workers. We exploit the 2003–2004 California workers' compensation reforms which reduced medical spending disproportionately for workers incurring low back injuries. We link administrative claims data to earnings records for injured workers and their uninjured coworkers. We find that workers with low back injuries experienced a 7.6% post-reform decline in medical care, and an 8.1% drop in post-injury earnings relative to other injured workers.

Powell Industries operating margin from 2010 to 2025. Operating margin can be defined as operating margin measurement of what proportion of a company's revenue is left over after paying for variable costs of production such as wages, raw materials, etc.

Small and bigger coding efforts to support Colorado River work. See Folder contents #1-20 below. Most of these efforts are beginning coding efforts and works in progress.

Download data, models, code, and directions at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5501466.

Find current versions at https://github.com/dzeke/ColoradoRiverCoding.

Explanation of Contents

1. 500PlusPlan - Total costs for different 500,000 acre-feet plan for Lake Mead prices and volumes.
2. BlogDrafts - Preprints of blogs in the series "Encouraging more water conservation in the Colorado River Basin".
3. CombinedPowellMead - Plots of combined Lake Powell and Lake Mead storage over time.
4. EvapCalcs - Plots to show reservoir evaporation for Lakes Mead and Powell as a function of reservoir storage/level. This supports an alternative management paradigm where reservoir evaporation is counted as part of lower basin users consumptive use.
5. GrandCanyonInterveningFlow - Plots of Grand Canyon intervening flow between Lake Powell and Lake Mead to help characterize inflows to Lake Mead.
6. HeadwatersReservoirs - Storage for Upper Basin headwaters reservoirs (Fontenelle, Flaming Gorge).
7. ICS - Plots of intentionally created surplus (ICS) for Lake Mead account balances, puts and takes, limits, and comparison of ICS efforts to mandatory Drought Contigency Plan contributions.
8. InterimShortageGuidelines - Plots of cutbacks in deliveries as a function of Lake Mead level. Both for the Interim Guidelines and newly released Drought Contingency Plan.
9. LakePowellTemperatureScenarios - Calcualtes the Lake Powell release temperatures for different lake levels. Assigns release temperatures to different fish scenarios.
10. LowerBasinAgUses - Plots of CRSS consumptive use input data for Lower Basin states.
11. MeadInflowSimulations - Adapt Lake Mead releases to reservoir inflow. Smulations of Lake Mead draw down, stabilization, and recover for different scenarios of Lake Mead inflow and addition water conservation beyond mandatory targets.
12. MeadPowellPlots - Visualization of the Lake Powell-Lake Mead Equalization rules. This is Powell annual release as a function of Powell storage and Mead storage. Also includes plots that show the reservoir zones.
13. ModelMusings - Pilot flex accounting to encourage more water conservation in a combined Lake Powell-Lake Mead system. Cloud-based interactive model for the Colorado River basin. When participants synchronously connect, they can role play Upper Basin, Lower Basin, Mexico, and other parties. Participants make year-to-year water conservation, consumption, purchase, and sale decisions for their party while they track other players' choices, account balances, reservoir storage, and impacts to Grand Canyon fish.
14. Powell10Year - Plots showing Lake Powell 10-year releases in comparison to Colorado River Compact Article III(d) requirement
15. Pre1922CompactWaterUse - Table of Pre-1922 Compact water use by state.
16. ProtectLakePowell - Figure of tools to protect Lake Powell elevations of 3,525 and 3,490 feet.
17. Runge_MCDM_Analysis - interactive parallel coordinate plot visualization of the 18 objectives use in the analysis by Runge et al of Glend Canyon Dam management alternatives. Runge, M. C., et al. (2015). "Decision analysis to support development of the Glen Canyon Dam long-term experimental and management plan." 2015-5176, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sir20155176.
18. TimeToDeadPool - a steady deterministic scenario analysis of the number of years to hit Lake Mead dead pool (or other target elevation) given a starting storage volume and steady reservoir inflow. Used to explore scenarios of inflow from 7 to 14 maf per year every year and identify potential effects of additional voluntary water conservation.
19. TribalWater - Digitizes some of the data in the Tribal Water Study by the USBR.
20. UpperBasinAgriculture - Costs of demand management in Upper Basin.

License

BSD-3-Clause (https://github.com/dzeke/ColoradoRiverFutures/blob/master/LICENSE). Available to use, modify, distribute, etc. for free. All modified or derivative products must use the same BSD-3-Clause license. This license keeps this work in the public domain forever.

Powell Industries هزینه های اجرایی - ارزش های فعلی، داده های تاریخی، پیش بینی، آمار، نمودار و تقویم اقتصادی - Jul 2025.Data for Powell Industries | هزینه های اجرایی including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last July in 2025.

Historical Dataset of Powell County School District is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Comparison of Diversity Score Trends,Total Revenues Trends,Total Expenditure Trends,Average Revenue Per Student Trends,Average Expenditure Per Student Trends,Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Trends,Math Proficiency Trends,Science Proficiency Trends,Graduation Rate Trends,Overall School District Rank Trends,Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2002-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1988-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (1991-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2016-2023),Comparison of Students By Grade Trends

This poll, conducted March 16-19, 1995, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on a range of political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their opinions of President Bill Clinton and his handling of the presidency, the economy, foreign affairs, and crime. Respondents were polled on the most important problem facing the country, whether they approved or disapproved of the way Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich, Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, and the United States Congress were doing their jobs, whether President Clinton or the Republicans in Congress would do a better job handling the country's problems, and whether each was seeking the right or wrong changes for the country. Opinions were solicited on whether the Republicans in Congress had begun to gridlock Washington, whether they kept most of their campaign promises, whether they proposed too many, too little, or the right amount of program cuts, and whether respondents supported or opposed most of their "Contract with America." A series of questions addressed the condition of the national economy, whether the federal budget could be balanced without raising taxes or cutting spending on Social Security and the military, and whether it was more important to pass a balanced budget amendment or to protect Social Security, maintain military spending, or hold down taxes. Respondents were asked whether they would vote for President Clinton or a Republican nominee in the 1996 presidential election, who the Republican and Democratic parties should nominate for president, and whether respondents held favorable or unfavorable views of Newt Gingrich, Bob Dole, Vice-President Al Gore, Senator Phil Gramm, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell, Republican presidential nominee Lamar Alexander, and California Governor Pete Wilson. Opinions were also solicited on whether respondents had more trust in their federal, state, or local government to handle issues such as fighting crime, setting environmental regulations, establishing welfare rules, and protecting civil rights, and whether they supported or opposed term limits for United States Representatives, as well as laws discouraging frivolous lawsuits. Questions regarding affirmative action addressed whether women and minorities should receive preference in hiring and college admissions to make up for past discrimination, whether affirmative action programs increased opportunities for these groups, and whether they should be continued, changed, or eliminated. Respondents were also asked whether these programs resulted in fewer opportunities for White men, whether this would be justified, whether the respondent or a family member felt they had been denied a job because of their race or sex, and whether it made them angry. Additional questions asked how closely respondents followed the O.J. Simpson trial, whether he was getting a fair trial, and whether he was guilty or innocent. Background variables include age, sex, ethnicity, education, religion, employment status, household income, political orientation, political party affiliation, subjective size of community, social class, number and sex of children, labor union membership, whether the respondent was registered to vote, whether he or she voted in the 1992 presidential election, and if so, for whom.

Powell Industries 부채에 대한이자 비용 - 현재 값, 이력 데이터, 예측, 통계, 차트 및 경제 달력 - Jun 2025.Data for Powell Industries | 부채에 대한이자 비용 including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last June in 2025.

High-resolution geophysical mapping of Lake Powell in the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area in Utah and Arizona was conducted between October 8 and November 15, 2017, as part of a collaborative effort between the U.S. Geological Survey and the Bureau of Reclamation to provide high-quality data needed to reassess the area-capacity tables for the Lake Powell reservoir. Seismic data collected during this survey can help to define the rates of deposition within the San Juan and Colorado Rivers, which are the main inflows to Lake Powell. These new data are intended to improve water budget management decisions that affect the natural and recreational resources of the reservoir. Multibeam echosounder bathymetry and backscatter data were collected along 2,312 kilometers of tracklines (331 square kilometers) of the lake floor to regionally define its depth and morphology, as well as the character and distribution of lake-floor sediments. Ninety-two kilometers of seismic-reflection profile data were also collected to define the thickness and structure of sediment deposits near the confluences of the San Juan and Colorado Rivers.

Steady low reservoir releases increase downstream primary and aquatic invertebrate (bugs) production. These releases also reduce hydropeaking value, raise costs for hydropower customers, and reduce funds to maintain infrastructure and repay loans. This study quantifies the win-lose tradeoff between hydropeaking value and days per month of steady low releases at Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. We estimate win-lose tradeoffs for monthly release volumes of 0.71 to 0.95 million acre-feet from March to October 2018 and 0 to 31 days. Conservative estimates indicate that steady low releases on eight weekend days per summer month in 2018 reduced monthly hydropeaking value by $430,000 to $850,000. We used results to design a financial instrument that gives ecosystem managers a budget to choose days of steady low releases and compensate hydropower producers for lost value. One option to reduce costs is shifting days of steady low releases to spring/fall months. Next steps include discussing the proposed instrument with more U.S. Federal agencies, conducting more flow experiments, and monitoring how timing and more steady low flow days per month affect bug production. Managers may extend to other experimental releases that mobilize sediment, build sand bars, or disadvantage non-native fish.

This resource contains the following items:

• README.md - Markdown file with documentation for this resource including directions to reproduce results in the manuscript
• GCD_BugFlowExperiment-main - Folder with sub-folders that contain the data, models, and code to reproduce figures, tables, and results in the manuscript.
• Final_Draft_JHI_2025.pdf -- PDF document with the up-to-date manuscript for the work.
• Rind and Rosenberg_2025_Supplementary.pdf --PDF document with supplementary information for the manuscript.
• Rosenberg-BugsPayForSteadyFlows-AprilAMP.pptx - Power point presentation with overview of work presented at April 12/13, 2023 meeting of the Technical Work Group (TWG) of Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCD-AMP).
• KeyFeedbackFromTechnicalWorkGroup-April12-2023.docx - Key feedback from presentation to GCD-AMP Technical Work Group on April 12, 2023.

Reproducibility: Bhupinderjeet Singh and Philip Moffatt at Washington State University, USA downloaded the materials and reproduced all figures and tables.

Updates: We encourage users to visit our GitHub repository (https://github.com/moazzamalirind/GCD_BugFlowExperiment.git) for the latest updates and extended project details.

The global optical Powell lens market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse sectors such as telecommunications, medical imaging, and industrial automation. The market size in 2025 is estimated at $500 million, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is fueled by advancements in lens design and manufacturing techniques leading to improved performance and miniaturization. The rising adoption of high-speed data communication networks and the growing need for precision optical systems in various applications are key drivers. Furthermore, ongoing research and development in materials science are contributing to the creation of more durable and efficient optical Powell lenses, further expanding market potential. Market segmentation reveals strong demand for specific lens types based on material, size, and application. Leading manufacturers such as Thorlabs, Blau Optoelektronik, and others are investing heavily in research and development to maintain their competitive edge. Geographic expansion, especially in rapidly developing economies in Asia-Pacific, is anticipated to contribute significantly to the market's overall growth trajectory. While some challenges exist in terms of raw material costs and stringent quality control requirements, the overall market outlook for optical Powell lenses remains positive, promising substantial growth and innovation over the forecast period.