In 2023/24, 6,922 individuals were referred to the Prevent Program in England and Wales, a key part of the UK government's counter-terrorism strategy. People referred to Prevent are thought to be at risk of being radicalized into supporting or committing acts of terrorism. Of the 6,922 referrals made in 2023/24, 893 were discussed at a panel but not escalated further, and 512 were ultimately adopted as a case.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This report is based on reflections generated during a scoping meeting with practitioners who work with children in relation to the topic of risk identification and radicalisation. This meeting was an initial scoping exercise to underpin a larger piece of research for a PhD inquiry: ‘Doing Risk’: Practitioner Interpretations of Risk of Childhood Radicalisation and The Implementation of the HM Government PREVENT Duty (2019).
In August 2021 HM Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS), the College of Policing and the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) published a report in response to the super-complaint submitted by the Centre for Women’s Justice on the police use of protective measures in cases involving violence against women and girls.
The report made recommendations to chief constables, the National Police Chiefs’ Council, the Home Office and the Ministry of Justice. The report also included actions for HMICFRS and the College of Policing regarding their own work. The details of these recommendations and actions are listed in section 2 of A duty to protect.
The report includes three actions for HMICFRS. Details of these and the HMICFRS response is included below:
‘In light of changes to pre-charge bail, we propose that HMICFRS should consider future inspection activity to review the impact of the changes’.
‘HMICFRS to continue to assess use of DVPN/DVPOs and any new domestic abuse orders through its wider inspection activity’.
‘HMICFRS should consider future inspection activity in respect of restraining orders, including supervision and monitoring use of these by police forces. After a suitable period when more data is available from the inspection activity, HMICFRS and His Majesty’s Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) should consider undertaking a review to assess how effective the police and CPS are at applying for restraining orders, and if there is any point of failure within the process that needs to be addressed’.
HMICFRS will, during its planning cycle, review whether inspection activity and/or monitoring should be undertaken to consider how issues raised in this super-complaint are being addressed by forces. Any proposed inspection activity would be subject to Home Office funding. HMICFRS is continuing to assess the use of DVPNs and DVPOs through its wider inspection activity.
‘The College of Policing will update its guidance to reflect changes needed on the implementation of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill and to clarify that officers may consider that if a suspect were to be released from police detention on bail with lawfully imposed conditions, the need for those conditions may well fulfil the ‘necessity test’ for arrest.’
The College will update its ‘Authorised Professional Practice’ (APP) on domestic abuse, in line with this action, when the new bill passes into law (due spring 2022).
In the third quarter of 2024, 81,370 households in England were owed either a prevention or relief duty for homelessness, with 36,450 qualifying for prevention duties, and 44,920 for relief duties. Prevention duties are granted to households that are threatened with homelessness within 56 days, while relief duties are granted to households that already homeless, placing a responsibility on the relevant local authority to either prevent or relieve homelessness.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Households in temporary accommodation - Total number of households in Temporary Accommodation with children
Households that are threatened with homelessness within 56 days are owed help from the local authority to prevent homelessness and the authority must work to relieve homelessness for those who are actually homeless. Households who are statutorily homeless are owed legal duties that fall into three main categories:
Prevention duties include any activities aimed at preventing a household threatened with homelessness from becoming homeless. This would involve activities to enable an applicant to remain in their current home or find alternative accommodation in order to prevent them from becoming homeless. The duty lasts for 56 days, but may be extended if the local authority is continuing with efforts to prevent homelessness.
Relief duties are owed to households that are already homeless and require help to secure settled accommodation. The duty lasts 56 days, and can only be extended by a local authority if the households would not be owed the main homelessness duty.
Main homelessness duty describes the duty a local authority has towards an applicant who is unintentionally homeless, eligible for assistance and has priority need. This definition has not been changed by the 2017 HRA. However, these households are now only owed a main duty if their homelessness has not been successfully prevented or relieved.
Data is Powered by LG Inform Plus and automatically checked for new data on the 3rd of each month.
The General Order detailing RPD members' affirmative duty to intervene to prevent or stop any member from using unreasonable force or otherwise acting contrary to law or RPD policy.
Under the Alberta Agricultural Pests Act (APA), all municipalities, counties and municipal districts in Alberta have the authority and responsibility to prevent and control Dutch elm disease. This fact sheet explains the powers and responsibilities outlined under the APA's prevention and control measures, and describes measures that should be taken to prevent and control the spread of the disease.
<p class="gem-c-attachment_metadata"><span class="gem-c-attachment_attribute"><abbr title="OpenDocument Spreadsheet" class="gem-c-attachment_abbr">ODS</abbr></span>, <span class="gem-c-attachment_attribute">309 KB</span></p>
<p class="gem-c-attachment_metadata">
This file is in an <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/using-open-document-formats-odf-in-your-organisation" target="_self" class="govuk-link">OpenDocument</a> format
For quarterly local authority-level tables prior to the latest financial year, see the Statutory homelessness release pages.
<p class="gem-c-attachment_metadata"><span class="gem-c-attachment_attribute"><abbr title="OpenDocument Spreadsheet" class="gem-c-attachment_abbr">ODS</abbr></span>, <span class="gem-c-attachment_attribute">1.19 MB</span></p>
<p class="gem-c-attachment_metadata">
This file is in an <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/using-open-document-formats-odf-in-your-organisation" target="_self" class="govuk-link">OpenDocument</a> format
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37658/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/37658/terms
Student threat assessment is intended to maintain school safety by resolving student conflicts or problems before they escalate into violence, with the secondary benefit of reducing reliance on safety practices that have deleterious consequences (e.g., zero-tolerance discipline). In 2013, Virginia legislation mandated the establishment of threat assessment teams in all K-12 public schools by July 1, 2014. The major goals of the project were to: determine how student threat assessment is implemented in statewide practice in Virginia schools; determine what student and school outcomes are associated with student threat assessment; and determine whether training/technical assistance can improve student threat assessment. To address Goal 1, the research team collected data across five years from the annual school safety audit survey that included information on how often threat assessments occur, characteristics of the threat cases, such as student demographics and how the threats were assessed, and the outcomes of the threat. The team also collected data on threat assessment training needs. To address Goal 2, the team correlated threat assessment data collected under Goal 1 with data on student and school outcomes obtained from the annual secondary school climate survey and statewide disciplinary records for school suspensions. To address Goal 3, the team developed, tested, and updated four separate online educational programs tailored to students, parents, staff, and threat assessment teams. These online programs have been implemented by schools in Virginia, 28 other states, and Canada. This collection contains school safety audit data from 2013 to 2018 and all-time data for the online educational program assessments through 2019. Case-level data, high-risk case level data, and school climate data are available for limited years. Qualitative data on training needs will be made available in a future update.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This report by ICJ outlines key recommendations of why the Government of Myanmar should impose a moratorium on the development of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) until it can ensure SEZs can be developed inline with international human rights laws and standards. This report assesses the laws governing Myanmar’s SEZs and finds that the legal framework is not consistent with the State’s duty to protect human rights.
In a survey conducted in Australia in 2019, regarding the strategies which parents used to prevent colds in their children, 97 percent of the respondents stated that they encouraged personal hygiene in order to prevent colds. Out of the four options given, taking over the counter products was the least selected by parents and caregivers to children.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
List of Prohibited Persons or Groups in the National Strategy and Action Plan of the Government of Nepal for Prevention of Money Laundering and Financial Investment in Terrorist Activities (2076-2081)
As of December 2019, ** percent of gamers from Japan reported that their reasoning to stop playing a mobile strategy game was that they got bored with the game. In comparison, ** percent of mobile gamers from the UK stopped playing a strategy mobile game because ads were too frequent.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
In 2023/24, 6,922 individuals were referred to the Prevent Program in England and Wales, a key part of the UK government's counter-terrorism strategy. People referred to Prevent are thought to be at risk of being radicalized into supporting or committing acts of terrorism. Of the 6,922 referrals made in 2023/24, 893 were discussed at a panel but not escalated further, and 512 were ultimately adopted as a case.