This report is based on reflections generated during a scoping meeting with practitioners who work with children in relation to the topic of risk identification and radicalisation. This meeting was an initial scoping exercise to underpin a larger piece of research for a PhD inquiry: ‘Doing Risk’: Practitioner Interpretations of Risk of Childhood Radicalisation and The Implementation of the HM Government PREVENT Duty (2019).

In 2023/24, 6,922 individuals were referred to the Prevent Program in England and Wales, a key part of the UK government's counter-terrorism strategy. People referred to Prevent are thought to be at risk of being radicalized into supporting or committing acts of terrorism. Of the 6,922 referrals made in 2023/24, 893 were discussed at a panel but not escalated further, and 512 were ultimately adopted as a case.

In the third quarter of 2024, ****** households in England were owed either a prevention or relief duty for homelessness, with ****** qualifying for prevention duties, and ****** for relief duties. Prevention duties are granted to households that are threatened with homelessness within ** days, while relief duties are granted to households that already homeless, placing a responsibility on the relevant local authority to either prevent or relieve homelessness.

Homelessness assessment (initial decision) - Threatened with homelessness - prevention duty owed - (YTD)

Households in temporary accommodation - Total number of households in Temporary Accommodation with children

Households that are threatened with homelessness within 56 days are owed help from the local authority to prevent homelessness and the authority must work to relieve homelessness for those who are actually homeless. Households who are statutorily homeless are owed legal duties that fall into three main categories:

Prevention duties include any activities aimed at preventing a household threatened with homelessness from becoming homeless. This would involve activities to enable an applicant to remain in their current home or find alternative accommodation in order to prevent them from becoming homeless. The duty lasts for 56 days, but may be extended if the local authority is continuing with efforts to prevent homelessness.

Relief duties are owed to households that are already homeless and require help to secure settled accommodation. The duty lasts 56 days, and can only be extended by a local authority if the households would not be owed the main homelessness duty.

Main homelessness duty describes the duty a local authority has towards an applicant who is unintentionally homeless, eligible for assistance and has priority need. This definition has not been changed by the 2017 HRA. However, these households are now only owed a main duty if their homelessness has not been successfully prevented or relieved.

Data is Powered by LG Inform Plus and automatically checked for new data on the 3rd of each month.

The General Order detailing RPD members' affirmative duty to intervene to prevent or stop any member from using unreasonable force or otherwise acting contrary to law or RPD policy.

Annual figures for each local authority in England on the outcomes of actions to prevent or relieve homelessness. Under the Homelessness Act 2002, local housing authorities must have a strategy for preventing homelessness in their district. The strategy must apply to everyone at risk of homelessness, including cases where someone is found to be homeless but not in priority need and cases where someone is found to be intentionally homeless. This means that prevention can be offered to any household, rather than a subset of the population considered eligible for assistance under the statutory homeless legislation. Homelessness prevention refers to positive action taken by the local authority which provides someone who considers themselves at risk of homelessness with a solution for at least the next six months. This is done by either assisting them to obtain alternative accommodation or enabling them to remain in their existing home. Homelessness relief occurs when an authority has been unable to prevent homelessness but helps someone to secure accommodation, even though the authority is under no statutory obligation to do so. This data set brings together the returns for each local authority, from 2009-10 to 2017-18 in one worksheet, based on the government's live table number 792 which provides each year's figures in a separate tab. The data is exactly the same from both sources, this re-formatting simply aims to help use and re-use the data more quickly and easily. In 2017-18 we have added region codes for each district, and have published a separate data set which gives the totals for each region and the whole of England. The 2017-18 version ​replaces previous versions, as it simply adds seven columns for 2017-18, alongside the columns for each previous financial year.

In a survey conducted in Australia in 2019, regarding the strategies which parents used to prevent colds in their children, ** percent of the respondents stated that they encouraged personal hygiene in order to prevent colds. Out of the **** options given, taking over the counter products was the least selected by parents and caregivers to children.

Under the Alberta Agricultural Pests Act (APA), all municipalities, counties and municipal districts in Alberta have the authority and responsibility to prevent and control Dutch elm disease. This fact sheet explains the powers and responsibilities outlined under the APA's prevention and control measures, and describes measures that should be taken to prevent and control the spread of the disease.

Student threat assessment is intended to maintain school safety by resolving student conflicts or problems before they escalate into violence, with the secondary benefit of reducing reliance on safety practices that have deleterious consequences (e.g., zero-tolerance discipline). In 2013, Virginia legislation mandated the establishment of threat assessment teams in all K-12 public schools by July 1, 2014. The major goals of the project were to: determine how student threat assessment is implemented in statewide practice in Virginia schools; determine what student and school outcomes are associated with student threat assessment; and determine whether training/technical assistance can improve student threat assessment. To address Goal 1, the research team collected data across five years from the annual school safety audit survey that included information on how often threat assessments occur, characteristics of the threat cases, such as student demographics and how the threats were assessed, and the outcomes of the threat. The team also collected data on threat assessment training needs. To address Goal 2, the team correlated threat assessment data collected under Goal 1 with data on student and school outcomes obtained from the annual secondary school climate survey and statewide disciplinary records for school suspensions. To address Goal 3, the team developed, tested, and updated four separate online educational programs tailored to students, parents, staff, and threat assessment teams. These online programs have been implemented by schools in Virginia, 28 other states, and Canada. This collection contains school safety audit data from 2013 to 2018 and all-time data for the online educational program assessments through 2019. Case-level data, high-risk case level data, and school climate data are available for limited years. Qualitative data on training needs will be made available in a future update.

The variables include: Local authority code, name and region; Assessment of the household’s homelessness circumstances; year and the quarter of the original assessment of circumstances and needs; Household's accommodation arrangements at the time of their homeless application; household's last settled accommodation; main reason for loss of last settled home; Household type; ethnic group, age, gender, nationality and employment status of the main applicant; employment status of the main applicant's partner if in same household; Main prevention activity undertaken by the local authority as part of the Prevention Duty and reason for that; household’s accommodation when the Prevention Duty ended; Main relief activity that was undertaken by the local authority as part of the Relief Duty; reason the Relief Duty was ended; whether household was homeless at the end of Relief; Coded outcome of the decision on what duty (if any) is owed; household’s accommodation following that decision; Year and quarter that the household entered and left local authority temporary accommodation; Whether the household is in receipt of housing benefits or means-tested benefits; Whether under support needs the household includes: Anyone in specific categories covering young persons, young parents, care leavers, older people, anyone with physical/mental ill health and/or a physical or learning disability; anyone who has experience of, or is at risk of, specific types of exploitation or abuse; anyone with drug or alcohol dependency needs, or with an offending history; anyone with a history of repeat homelessness or rough sleeping; whether they are a former asylum seeker whether have served in HM Forces; or whether they need access to education, employment or training. Grouped accommodation outcomes across duties. For further details, see documentation.

Highlights cards provides an overview of what has been achieved to date in Queensland, with community, business and government working together to address domestic and family violence.

This report by ICJ outlines key recommendations of why the Government of Myanmar should impose a moratorium on the development of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) until it can ensure SEZs can be developed inline with international human rights laws and standards. This report assesses the laws governing Myanmar’s SEZs and finds that the legal framework is not consistent with the State’s duty to protect human rights.

List of Prohibited Persons or Groups in the National Strategy and Action Plan of the Government of Nepal for Prevention of Money Laundering and Financial Investment in Terrorist Activities (2076-2081)