Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Goodness-of-fit test for BTC/GBP.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Descriptive statistics for BTC/HKD.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Descriptive statistics for BTC/EUR.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
We observe that while our model was able to reproduce the scale-free behaviour and diassortativity of the empirical network (for the 2 periods), the clustering coefficients still differ. We relate it to the social aspects of the bitcoin system which were not implemented in the current model.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Descriptive statistics for BTC/RMB.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
An increased number of links and nodes in the second period shows that the bitcoin network had grown significantly by 2013. A larger clustering coefficient in the late period indicates a higher connectivity of the system users. The average degree also increased in the late period, showing that the system had become more popular as each node tended to create more connections in comparison to the first period (where most of the nodes transacted only a few times).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Normality test for BTC/HKD.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Goodness-of-fit test for BTC/GBP.