Price to Rent Ratio in the United States increased to 134.04 in the fourth quarter of 2024 from 133.46 in the third quarter of 2024. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Price to Rent Ratio.

United States US: Price to Rent Ratio: sa data was reported at 133.530 2015=100 in 2024. This records an increase from the previous number of 133.173 2015=100 for 2023. United States US: Price to Rent Ratio: sa data is updated yearly, averaging 89.750 2015=100 from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2024, with 55 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 137.339 2015=100 in 2022 and a record low of 89.750 2015=100 in 1997. United States US: Price to Rent Ratio: sa data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.OECD.AHPI: House Price Index: Seasonally Adjusted: OECD Member: Annual. Nominal house prices divided by rent price indices

The house price to rent ratio index in the U.S. declined in the second half of 2022 and remained stable until the end of 2024, indicating that house price growth slowed down compared to rental growth. At its peak, in the second quarter of 2022, the index stood at *****. House prices increased dramatically since the coronavirus pandemic. Meanwhile, rents have grown notably, but at a slower rate. What does the house price to rent ratio index measure? The house-price-to-rent-ratio measures the evolution of house prices compared to rents. It is calculated by dividing the median house price by the median annual rent. In this statistic, the values have been normalized with 100 equaling the 2015 ratio. Consequentially, a value under 100 means that rental rates have risen more than house prices. Compared to the OECD countries average, the gap between house prices and rents in the United States was wider. The house price to rent ratio in different countries The house price to rent ratio in the United Kingdom continued to increase in the second half of 2022, but growth softened, as the housing market cooled. On the other hand, the index in Germany fell drastically between the second quarter of 2022 and the second quarter of 2023. A similar trend was observed in France.

Real Estate Breakeven Analysis for U.S. Home Types

Buy vs Rent Comparison Across Markets

By Zillow Data [source]

About this dataset

This dataset provides a comprehensive analysis of the current real estate situation in the United States. It includes breakeven analysis charts that compare buying vs renting across major U.S. markets. This dataset contains various metrics such as home types, housing stock, price-to-income ratio, cash buyers, mortgage affordability and rental affordability to name a few. This data has been compiled using Zillow's own data along with TransUnion financing survey data and the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey to provide an accurate understanding of each metro area’s market health and purchasing power for buyers and renters alike. By downloading this information you can compare different regions based on size rank and other factors to get full insights regarding their potential fit for your needs or investments strategies as well as any potential risks associated with each region's housing market health

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset is for real estate professionals, owner-occupants, potential buyers and renters who are interested in understanding which U.S. markets offer the most favorable home buying or rental opportunities from a financial perspective over the long term.

The “Real Estate Breakeven Analysis for U.S Home Types” dataset contains data pulled from Zillow's current and forecasted housing market metrics across many different real estate regions in the United States including cities, counties, states, metro areas and combined statistical areas (CSAs). The data includes several measures of affordability such as median price-to-rent ratio (MedPR), median breakeven horizon (MedBE) - which refers to how long it takes to make up purchase costs when compared with renting; cash purchaser share; mortgage rate; mortgage affordability indices; rental affordability rates etc.

In order to analyze and compare buying vs renting decisions across various regions in the US this dataset provides breakeven analysis at various levels of geographies i.e., state names, region types (city/metro area/county) and show how long it will take homeowners to break even on their purchase costs when compared with renting in that region over a longer period of time using discounted cash flow methodology. This information helps people understand what type of transaction is a better fit for them by weighing short term vs long term goals accordingly by evaluating these different factors related to housing metrics carefully before making financial decisions about purchasing or renting properties in desired location(s).

To use this dataset one can use either basic filters like RegionType or RegionName or more detailed filter criteria like CountyName, City name , Metro area name , State Name etc . For example if someone wanted to look at properties available for rent only then they can apply filters based on Province Type =‘Rental’ Also one can further refine searches based on filtering them with defined SampleRate , Median Price – To – Rent Ratio …..etc . This could be useful if seekers would want only specific type of property like Condominium/Coop /Multifamily 5+ Units /Duplex Triplex listing etc …and then apply other parameters like Cash Buyers percent , Mortgage Affordability Rate….etc ..in order narrow down search results while looking at Breakeven scores /horizons in their target locations . One should take advantages of all relevant parameters while searching through data before making any decision related with owning rental properties so that they can make sure best possible investment decision given

Research Ideas

• Visualizing changes in real estate trends across regions by comparing price to rent ratios, mortgage affordability indices and cash buyers over time.
• Market segmentation analysis based on region-level market characteristics such as negative equity data, rental affordability, median house values and population size.
• Predicting housing demand within a particular region based on its breakeven horizon or price to rent ratio

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

See the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: BreakEven_2017-03.csv | Column name | Description | |:----------------|:----------------------------------------------------...

Portugal, Canada, and the United States were the countries with the highest house price to income ratio in 2024. In all three countries, the index exceeded 130 index points, while the average for all OECD countries stood at 116.2 index points. The index measures the development of housing affordability and is calculated by dividing nominal house price by nominal disposable income per head, with 2015 set as a base year when the index amounted to 100. An index value of 120, for example, would mean that house price growth has outpaced income growth by 20 percent since 2015. How have house prices worldwide changed since the COVID-19 pandemic? House prices started to rise gradually after the global financial crisis (2007–2008), but this trend accelerated with the pandemic. The countries with advanced economies, which usually have mature housing markets, experienced stronger growth than countries with emerging economies. Real house price growth (accounting for inflation) peaked in 2022 and has since lost some of the gain. Although, many countries experienced a decline in house prices, the global house price index shows that property prices in 2023 were still substantially higher than before COVID-19. Renting vs. buying In the past, house prices have grown faster than rents. However, the home affordability has been declining notably, with a direct impact on rental prices. As people struggle to buy a property of their own, they often turn to rental accommodation. This has resulted in a growing demand for rental apartments and soaring rental prices.

This map shows housing costs as a percentage of household income. Severe housing cost burden is described as when over 50% of income in a household is spent on housing costs. For renters it is over 50% of household income going towards gross rent (contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities). Miami, Florida accounts for the having the highest population of renters with severe housing burden costs.The map's topic is shown by tract and county centroids. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Income is based on earnings in past 12 months of survey. Current Vintage: 2015-2019ACS Table(s): B25070, B25091Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 10, 2020National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis map can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2010 AWATER (Area Water) boundaries offered by TIGER. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Approximately 42.5 percent of residents in renter-occupied housing units in the United States paid gross rent which exceeded 35 percent of their income in 2023. In comparison, about 12.3 percent paid less than 15 percent of their gross household income.

The rent price index in Australia in the first quarter of 2025 was *****, marking an increase from the same quarter of the previous year. Rent prices had decreased in 2020; in Melbourne and Sydney, this was mainly attributed to the absence of international students during the coronavirus outbreak. The current state of the rental market in Australia The rental market in Australia has been marked by varying conditions across different regions. Among the capital cities, Sydney has long been recognized for having some of the highest average rents. As of March 2025, the average weekly rent for a house in Sydney was *** Australian dollars, which was the highest average rent across all major cities in Australia that year. Furthermore, due to factors like population growth and housing demand, regional areas have also seen noticeable increases in rental prices. For instance, households in the non-metropolitan area of New South Wales’ expenditure on rent was around ** percent of their household income in the year ending June 2024. Housing affordability in Australia Housing affordability remains a significant challenge in Australia, contributing to a trend where many individuals and families rent for prolonged periods. The underlying cause of this issue is the ongoing disparity between household wages and housing costs, especially in large cities. While renting offers several advantages, it is worth noting that the associated costs may not always align with the expectation of affordability. Approximately one-third of participants in a recent survey stated that they pay between ** and ** percent of their monthly income on rent. Recent government initiatives, such as the 2024 Help to Buy scheme, aim to make it easier for people across Australia to get onto the property ladder. Still, the multifaceted nature of Australia’s housing affordability problem requires continued efforts to strike a balance between market dynamics and the need for accessible housing options for Australians.

The housing affordability measure illustrates the relationship between income and housing costs. A household that spends 30% or more of its collective monthly income to cover housing costs is considered to be “housing cost-burden[ed].”[1] Those spending between 30% and 49.9% of their monthly income are categorized as “moderately housing cost-burden[ed],” while those spending more than 50% are categorized as “severely housing cost-burden[ed].”[2]

How much a household spends on housing costs affects the household’s overall financial situation. More money spent on housing leaves less in the household budget for other needs, such as food, clothing, transportation, and medical care, as well as for incidental purchases and saving for the future.

The estimated housing costs as a percentage of household income are categorized by tenure: all households, those that own their housing unit, and those that rent their housing unit.

Throughout the period of analysis, the percentage of housing cost-burdened renter households in Champaign County was higher than the percentage of housing cost-burdened homeowner households in Champaign County. All three categories saw year-to-year fluctuations between 2005 and 2023, and none of the three show a consistent trend. However, all three categories were estimated to have a lower percentage of housing cost-burdened households in 2023 than in 2005.

Data on estimated housing costs as a percentage of monthly income was sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 1-Year Estimates, which are released annually.

As with any datasets that are estimates rather than exact counts, it is important to take into account the margins of error (listed in the column beside each figure) when drawing conclusions from the data.

Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, instead of providing the standard 1-year data products, the Census Bureau released experimental estimates from the 1-year data in 2020. This includes a limited number of data tables for the nation, states, and the District of Columbia. The Census Bureau states that the 2020 ACS 1-year experimental tables use an experimental estimation methodology and should not be compared with other ACS data. For these reasons, and because data is not available for Champaign County, no data for 2020 is included in this Indicator.

For interested data users, the 2020 ACS 1-Year Experimental data release includes a dataset on Housing Tenure.

[1] Schwarz, M. and E. Watson. (2008). Who can afford to live in a home?: A look at data from the 2006 American Community Survey. U.S. Census Bureau.

[2] Ibid.

Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2023 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (17 October 2024).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2022 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (22 September 2023).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2021 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (30 September 2022).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2019 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (10 June 2021).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2018 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using data.census.gov; (10 June 2021).;U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2017 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (13 September 2018).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (14 September 2017).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2015 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (19 September 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2013 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2012 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2011 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2010 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2009 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2008 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; 16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2007 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2006 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).; U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2005 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Table B25106; generated by CCRPC staff; using American FactFinder; (16 March 2016).

This layer shows housing costs as a percentage of household income. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Income is based on earnings in past 12 months of survey. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of renter households that spend 30.0% or more of their household income on gross rent (contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities). To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B25070, B25091 Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

房价租金比：经季节性调整后在12-01-2024达133.5302015=100，相较于12-01-2023的133.1732015=100有所增长。房价租金比：经季节性调整后数据按年更新，12-01-1970至12-01-2024期间平均值为89.7502015=100，共55份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于12-01-2022，达137.3392015=100，而历史最低值则出现于12-01-1997，为89.7502015=100。CEIC提供的房价租金比：经季节性调整后数据处于定期更新的状态，数据来源于Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development，数据归类于全球数据库的美国 – Table US.OECD.AHPI: House Price Index: Seasonally Adjusted: OECD Member: Annual。

Graph and download economic data for Homeownership Rate in the United States (RHORUSQ156N) from Q1 1965 to Q2 2025 about homeownership, housing, rate, and USA.

This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show comparison of housing ownership costs and rental costs to income by State of Georgia in the Atlanta region.

The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.

The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.

For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.

Naming conventions:

Prefixes:

None

Count

p

Percent

r

Rate

m

Median

a

Mean (average)

t

Aggregate (total)

ch

Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)

pch

Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)

chp

Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)

Suffixes:

None

Change over two periods

_e

Estimate from most recent ACS

_m

Margin of Error from most recent ACS

_00

Decennial 2000

Attributes:

SumLevel

Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, SuperDistrict, etc)

GEOID

Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code

NAME

Name of geographic unit

Planning_Region

Planning region designation for ARC purposes

Acres

Total area within the tract (in acres)

SqMi

Total area within the tract (in square miles)

County

County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)

CountyName

County Name

HUM_SMOCAPI_e

# Housing units with a mortgage, costs as a percentage of income computed, 2017

HUM_SMOCAPI_m

# Housing units with a mortgage, costs as a percentage of income computed, 2017 (MOE)

MSMOCAPI30PctPlus_e

# Housing units with a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017

MSMOCAPI30PctPlus_m

# Housing units with a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017 (MOE)

pMSMOCAPI30PctPlus_e

% Housing units with a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017

pMSMOCAPI30PctPlus_m

% Housing units with a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017 (MOE)

HUNM_SMOCAPI_e

# Housing units without a mortgage, costs as a percentage of income computed, 2017

HUNM_SMOCAPI_m

# Housing units without a mortgage, costs as a percentage of income computed, 2017 (MOE)

NMSMOCAPI30PctPlus_e

# Housing units without a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017

NMSMOCAPI30PctPlus_m

# Housing units without a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017 (MOE)

pNMSMOCAPI30PctPlus_e

% Housing units without a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017

pNMSMOCAPI30PctPlus_m

% Housing units without a mortgage, costs 30.0 percent of income or more, 2017 (MOE)

OccGRAPI_e

# Occupied units for which rent as a percentage of income can be computed, 2017

OccGRAPI_m

# Occupied units for which rent as a percentage of income can be computed, 2017 (MOE)

GRAPI30PctPlus_e

# Gross rent 30.0 percent of income or greater, 2017

GRAPI30PctPlus_m

# Gross rent 30.0 percent of income or greater, 2017 (MOE)

pGRAPI30PctPlus_e

% Gross rent 30.0 percent of income or greater, 2017

pGRAPI30PctPlus_m

% Gross rent 30.0 percent of income or greater, 2017 (MOE)

HousingCost30PctPlus_e

# All occupied units for which costs exceed 30 percent of income, 2017

HousingCost30PctPlus_m

# All occupied units for which costs exceed 30 percent of income, 2017 (MOE)

PayingForHousing_e

# Total households paying for housing (rent or owner costs), 2017

PayingForHousing_m

# Total households paying for housing (rent or owner costs), 2017 (MOE)

pHousingCost30PctPlus_e

% Occupied units for which costs exceed 30 percent of income, 2017

pHousingCost30PctPlus_m

% Occupied units for which costs exceed 30 percent of income, 2017 (MOE)

last_edited_date

Last date the feature was edited by ARC

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission

Date: 2013-2017

For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.

Table from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series on housing tenure and cost related topics for City of Seattle Council Districts, Comprehensive Plan Growth Areas and Community Reporting Areas. Table includes B25003 Tenure of Occupied Housing Units, B25070 Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income in the Past 12 Months, B25063 Gross Rent, B25091 Mortgage Status by Selected Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income in the Past 12 Months, B25087 Mortgage Stauts and Selected Monthly Owner Costs, B25064 Median Gross Rent, B25088 Median Selected Monthly Owner Costs by Mortgage Status. Data is pulled from block group tables for the most recent ACS vintage and summarized to the neighborhoods based on block group assignment.Table created for and used in the Neighborhood Profiles application.Vintages: 2023ACS Table(s): B25003, B25070, B25063, B25091, B25087, B25064, B25088Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's Explore Census Data The United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2020 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Price to Rent Ratio：SA在12-01-2024达134.1182015=100，相较于12-01-2023的133.7102015=100有所增长。Price to Rent Ratio：SA数据按年更新，12-01-1970至12-01-2024期间平均值为99.0692015=100，共55份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于12-01-2022，达137.6722015=100，而历史最低值则出现于12-01-1997，为89.6692015=100。CEIC提供的Price to Rent Ratio：SA数据处于定期更新的状态，数据来源于Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development，数据归类于全球数据库的美国 – Table US.OECD.AHPI: House Price Index: Seasonally Adjusted: OECD Member: Annual。

As the renewable energy transition accelerates, housing, due to its high energy demand, can play a critical role in the clean energy shift. Specifically, multifamily housing provides a unique opportunity for solar photovoltaic (PV) system adoption, given the existing competing interests between landlords and tenants which has historically slowed this transition. To address this transition gap, this project identified and ranked Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in the United States for ZNE Capital (the client) to acquire multifamily housing to install solar PV systems. The group identified seven criteria to determine favorable markets for rooftop solar PV on multifamily housing: landlord policy favorability, real estate market potential, CO2 abatement potential, electricity generation potential, solar installation internal rate of return, climate risk avoidance, and health costs associated with primary air pollutants. A total investment favorability score is calculated based on criteria importance assigned by the user. Investment favorability scores were investigated for different preferences to demonstrate the robustness and generalizability of the framework. The data analysis and criteria calculations were conducted using RStudio, ultimately to provide reproducible code to be used for future projects. The results are presented in a ranked list from best to worst metro areas to invest in. Future studies can utilize the reproducible code to inform decisions on where to invest in solar PV on multifamily housing anywhere in the United States by changing weights within the model depending on preferences. Methods

Collecting real estate and landlord data for metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) from federal agency databases.

Real estate metrics: Six indicator metrics were selected to represent areas with growing housing demands. The metrics included were population growth, employment growth, average annual occupancy, annual rent change, the ratios of median annual rent to median income, and median income to median home price. The population estimates and median income data was downloaded from the Census Bureau. Median rent data was downloaded from HUDuser. Median home price data was downloaded from National Association of REALTORS®. Students were provided temporary memberships to Yardi Systems Matrix to obtain multifamily occupancy rates, and this data will not be redistributed. All the real estate metrics were combined into a single dataset using CBSA codes, which each MSA has a unique 5-digit identifier. Income-to-home price and rent-to-income ratios were calculated in R Studio.

Landlord data: the minimum security deposit and eviction notice data was collected for each state and manually compiled into an Excel. Security deposit information was provided as the number of months of rent. States with no maximum deposit limit received a score of 1.0, meaning it was the most favorable. Two month's rent was scored as 0.5, and one month's rent was given a score of 0.

Using NREL's REopt web tool to 1) model solar PV system on multifamily buildings in various cities and 2) obtain data to represent energy generation, CO2 abatement potential, avoided health costs from emissions, and solar project financial criteria.

An anchor city was identified within each MSA as the city with the highest population to input into the REopt tool. Default inputs were changed based on information provided by industry experts and changes in federal funding programs. Detailed instructions of inputs were created to ensure consistency when running the model for each city. The four outputs collected from the tool include: annual energy generation from renewables (%), lifecycle total CO2 emissions, health costs associated with primary air pollutants, and internal rate of return(%). The group divided up a list of cities, input the respective data for each one, obtained the outputs, then compiled it into a Google sheet. Outputs were checked by other members to ensure accuracy.

Collecting climate risk data from FEMA's National Risk Index Map.

Climate risk data was downloaded as a CSV file. The risk score was used to represent impacts of climate variability on long-term real estate investments. Risk scores were provided at the county level. The group identified the county each city resided in, to associate the correct score to each city in R Studio

Normalizing the data

Metrics were normalized by subtracting the minimum value for the metric from each value and dividing by the difference between the maximum and minimum values. This resulted in scores between 0 and 1 that were relative to the MSAs included in the analysis.

Weighing the data

Real Estate and Landlord Criteria metrics: these two criteria contained more than one metric, so the metrics within these criteria were weighted to produce real estate and landlord scores. Weights for each criterion sum to 1, in which higher weights indicate greater importance for multifamily real estate investments. Each weight was multiplied by the respective metric, then all weighted metrics within each criterion were summed to produce the criteria score. Investment Favorability Score: seven criteria were multiplied by respective weights based on the stakeholder's preferences. Weights sum to 1 to ensure consistency throughout the project. The sum of the seven weighted criteria is the investment favorability score.

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2014, 5-year estimates of the key housing characteristics of State Senate Legislative Districts (Upper) geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 406 fields for the variable groups H01: Housing occupancy (universe: total housing units, table X25, 3 fields); H02: Units in structure (universe: total housing units, table X25, 11 fields); H03: Population in occupied housing units by tenure by units in structure (universe: total population in occupied housing units, table X25, 13 fields); H04: Year structure built (universe: total housing units, table X25, 15 fields); H05: Rooms (universe: total housing units, table X25, 18 fields); H06: Bedrooms (universe: total housing units, table X25, 21 fields); H07: Housing tenure by race of householder (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 51 fields); H08: Total population in occupied housing units by tenure (universe: total population in occupied housing units, table X25, 3 fields); H09: Vacancy status (universe: vacant housing units, table X25, 8 fields); H10: Occupied housing units by race of householder (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 8 fields); H11: Year householder moved into unit (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 18 fields); H12: Vehicles available (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 18 fields); H13: Housing heating fuel (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 10 fields); H14: Selected housing characteristics (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 9 fields); H15: Occupants per room (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 13 fields); H16: Housing value (universe: owner-occupied units, table X25, 32 fields); H17: Price asked for vacant for sale only, and sold not occupied housing units (universe: vacant for sale only, and sold not occupied housing units, table X25, 28 fields); H18: Mortgage status (universe: owner-occupied units, table X25, 10 fields); H19: Selected monthly owner costs, SMOC (universe: owner-occupied housing units with or without a mortgage, table X25, 45 fields); H20: Selected monthly owner costs as a percentage of household income, SMOCAPI (universe: owner-occupied housing units with or without a mortgage, table X25, 26 fields); H21: Contract rent distribution and rent asked distribution in dollars (universe: renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent and vacant, for rent, and rented not occupied housing units, table X25, 7 fields); H22: Gross rent (universe: occupied units paying rent, table X25, 28 fields), and; X23: Gross rent as percentage of household income (universe: occupied units paying rent, table X25, 11 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2014 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

About This Dataset

This dataset is the original 70-city version used in my first published research paper: “A Data-Driven Survey on Cost of Living and Salary Affordability in Indian Cities” (IJRASET, 2025) Link: https://www.ijraset.com/best-journal/a-datadriven-survey-on-cost-of-livingsalary-affordability-in-indian-cities

It was created using web-scraping techniques from LivingCost.org and converted to INR using a consistent USD→INR exchange rate. This dataset forms the foundational base for affordability analysis, exploratory data analysis (EDA), and benchmarking cost-of-living patterns across India.

The dataset includes 70+ Indian cities, with fields covering living cost, rent, salary, affordability ratio (“months covered”), and derived financial indicators. It is clean, structured, and suitable for beginner to intermediate analytics projects.

Why This Dataset?

This dataset is ideal for:

EDA practice for college & school projects

Correlation and regression analysis

Basic ML tasks (predicting salary, affordability, rent, etc.)

Urban economics mini-projects

Dashboard creation (PowerBI, Tableau)

Data cleaning and preprocessing assignments

It is designed to be simple enough for students but structured enough for real-world analysis.

Features Included

Each row represents a city/state-level affordability profile with:

Cost of living (USD & INR)

Rent for a single person (USD & INR)

Monthly after-tax salary (USD & INR)

Income after rent

“Months Covered” affordability ratio

Source URLs for verification

Exchange rate used

This makes the dataset both transparent and reliable for academic usage.

Data Quality

Web-scraped directly from LivingCost.org

Cleaned and standardized

Currency converted uniformly

Non-city entries flagged

Fully reproducible from the source

This dataset served as the master input for my peer-reviewed paper and has been validated through statistical analysis.

Intended Audience

Students (school, undergraduate, postgraduate)

Data science beginners

Educators needing real datasets for teaching

Analysts looking for quick EDA practice

Researchers exploring affordability or urban economics

Note

A more comprehensive 200+ city enhanced dataset (used in my second paper) will be uploaded soon, including ICT metrics, GDP, and extended affordability indicators.

US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 2017, 5-year estimates of the key housing characteristics of State Senate Legislative Districts (Upper) geographic level in Orange County, California. The data contains 406 fields for the variable groups H01: Housing occupancy (universe: total housing units, table X25, 3 fields); H02: Units in structure (universe: total housing units, table X25, 11 fields); H03: Population in occupied housing units by tenure by units in structure (universe: total population in occupied housing units, table X25, 13 fields); H04: Year structure built (universe: total housing units, table X25, 15 fields); H05: Rooms (universe: total housing units, table X25, 18 fields); H06: Bedrooms (universe: total housing units, table X25, 21 fields); H07: Housing tenure by race of householder (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 51 fields); H08: Total population in occupied housing units by tenure (universe: total population in occupied housing units, table X25, 3 fields); H09: Vacancy status (universe: vacant housing units, table X25, 8 fields); H10: Occupied housing units by race of householder (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 8 fields); H11: Year householder moved into unit (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 18 fields); H12: Vehicles available (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 18 fields); H13: Housing heating fuel (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 10 fields); H14: Selected housing characteristics (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 9 fields); H15: Occupants per room (universe: occupied housing units, table X25, 13 fields); H16: Housing value (universe: owner-occupied units, table X25, 32 fields); H17: Price asked for vacant for sale only, and sold not occupied housing units (universe: vacant for sale only, and sold not occupied housing units, table X25, 28 fields); H18: Mortgage status (universe: owner-occupied units, table X25, 10 fields); H19: Selected monthly owner costs, SMOC (universe: owner-occupied housing units with or without a mortgage, table X25, 45 fields); H20: Selected monthly owner costs as a percentage of household income, SMOCAPI (universe: owner-occupied housing units with or without a mortgage, table X25, 26 fields); H21: Contract rent distribution and rent asked distribution in dollars (universe: renter-occupied housing units paying cash rent and vacant, for rent, and rented not occupied housing units, table X25, 7 fields); H22: Gross rent (universe: occupied units paying rent, table X25, 28 fields), and; X23: Gross rent as percentage of household income (universe: occupied units paying rent, table X25, 11 fields). The US Census geodemographic data are based on the 2017 TigerLines across multiple geographies. The spatial geographies were merged with ACS data tables. See full documentation at the OCACS project github page (https://github.com/ktalexan/OCACS-Geodemographics).

The American Community Survey 5-year Data Profile (DP04) of Selected Housing Characteristics was downloaded from the U.S. Census Bureau for state, county, place, reservation, house district, senate district and tract geographies in the state of Montana.Selected housing characteristics in this data set include: HOUSING OCCUPANCY, UNITS IN STRUCTURE, YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT, ROOMS, BEDROOMS, HOUSING TENURE, YEAR HOUSEHOLDER MOVED INTO UNIT, VEHICLES AVAILABLE, HOUSE HEATING FUEL, SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS, OCCUPANTS PER ROOM, VALUE, MORTGAGE STATUS, SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS (SMOC), SELECTED MONTHLY OWNER COSTS AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (SMOCAPI), GROSS RENT, GROSS RENT AS A PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME (GRAPI). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. Downloaded December 2020.Please refer to the American Community Survey section of the U.S. Census Bureau website for detailed information about this data set.