Producer Prices in Uganda increased to 234 points in March from 233.80 points in February of 2023. This dataset provides - Uganda Producer Prices- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

This statistic shows the estimated value of exported commodities from Uganda in 2023. In 2023, agricultural products with an estimated worth of *** billion U.S. dollars were exported from Uganda.

The Uganda Cereals Market report segments the industry into Type (Maize, Millet, Sorghum, Rice). The report includes Production Analysis, Consumption Analysis, Import Market Analysis by Value and Volume, Export Market Analysis by Value and Volume, and Price Trend Analysis. Five years of historical data and five-year forecasts are provided.

Indonesia Export: Value: Copper: Uganda data was reported at 0.021 USD mn in Feb 2014. This records an increase from the previous number of 0.001 USD mn for Apr 2013. Indonesia Export: Value: Copper: Uganda data is updated monthly, averaging 0.021 USD mn from Jan 2012 (Median) to Feb 2014, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.058 USD mn in Jan 2012 and a record low of 0.001 USD mn in Apr 2013. Indonesia Export: Value: Copper: Uganda data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Central Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Foreign Trade – Table ID.JAE025: Export: Commodities by Country: Copper.

Exports in Uganda increased to 1198.90 USD Million in May from 1121 USD Million in April of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Uganda Exports - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Indonesia Export: Value: Liquid Sugar: Uganda data was reported at 0.000 USD mn in Dec 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 USD mn for Nov 2014. Indonesia Export: Value: Liquid Sugar: Uganda data is updated monthly, averaging 0.090 USD mn from Feb 2012 (Median) to Dec 2014, with 25 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.184 USD mn in Apr 2013 and a record low of 0.000 USD mn in Dec 2014. Indonesia Export: Value: Liquid Sugar: Uganda data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Central Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Foreign Trade – Table ID.JAE036: Export: Commodities by Country: Liquid Sugar.

Food and input prices of selected Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA) member countries namely Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Ethiopia, for the below commodities: a) Food commodities: banana, beans, beef, milk, irish potatoes, maize, rice, wheat, teff b) Inputs: dap, diesel, gasoline

Indonesia Export: Value: Garment: Uganda data was reported at 0.084 USD mn in May 2019. This records an increase from the previous number of 0.005 USD mn for Apr 2019. Indonesia Export: Value: Garment: Uganda data is updated monthly, averaging 0.016 USD mn from Jan 2012 (Median) to May 2019, with 72 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.143 USD mn in Jan 2016 and a record low of 0.000 USD mn in Sep 2016. Indonesia Export: Value: Garment: Uganda data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Central Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Foreign Trade – Table ID.JAE027: Export: Commodities by Country: Garment.

Inflation Rate in Uganda increased to 3.90 percent in June from 3.80 percent in May of 2025. This dataset provides - Uganda Inflation Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Imports in Uganda increased to 1545.40 USD Million in May from 1453.70 USD Million in April of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - Uganda Imports - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Credit report of Ideal Commodities Uganda Ltd. contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.

Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: Manufactured Products data was reported at 11.220 % in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 11.170 % for 2015. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: Manufactured Products data is updated yearly, averaging 11.470 % from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2016, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 16.270 % in 1994 and a record low of 6.860 % in 2004. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: Manufactured Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

Credit report of Shayona Commodities Limited Kampala Kampala Central Divi Kam Nullnull Central Division Nkrumah Road Nkrumah Nasser Link 58 4647 Kampala contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.

Coffee fell to 288.72 USd/Lbs on July 11, 2025, down 0.41% from the previous day. Over the past month, Coffee's price has fallen 16.63%, but it is still 15.90% higher than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Coffee - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on July of 2025.

Abstract

Although the first case of COVID-19 in Uganda was confirmed on the 22nd of March, the Government of Uganda had undertaken several actions starting on the 18th of March, including travel restrictions, 14-day quarantine for all international arrivals, and cancellation of all international conferences and public gatherings, including, but not limited to, religious services, weddings, and concerts. On the 30th of March, the President declared a nationwide curfew from 7 pm to 6:30 am; banned public transportation; and instituted strict regulations for the movement of government and private vehicles. Vaccination campaigns began in March 2021. Uganda re-entered a partial lockdown starting on June 7th, 2021. The second lockdown was slightly longer than the first one but less strict. A presidential directive banned travel between districts, restricted gatherings, and suspended schools. As governments implement various containment measures, it is important to understand how households in the country are affected and responding to the evolving crises, so that policy responses can be designed well and targeted effectively to reduce the negative impacts on household welfare. The original objective of the UHFPS was to monitor the socio-economic effects of COVID-19 and its related restrictions. The survey has followed the evolving COVID-19 pandemic in real-time and contributed to filling critical gaps in information that could be used by the government and stakeholders to help design policies to mitigate the negative impacts on its population. Lately, the objective of the UHFPS has unfolded to track the socioeconomic effects of global crises. A new phase of the survey was inaugurated to monitor economic sentiments and the socioeconomic impact of other shocks such as the Russia-Ukraine war and extreme weather events. The UHFPS is proposed to have multiple rounds to accommodate the evolving nature of the crisis. Questionnaires are revised before each new round of surveys to adapt to crises develops. The final sample for the first round of the survey is 2,257 households selected from those of the Uganda National Panel Survey (UNPS) wave 8 that had a phone number for at least one household member or one reference individual. All households not explicitly refusing to participate in the survey are reinterviewed in the consequent rounds. The final sample for round 2 is 2199; whereas the final sample for round 3 and round 4 counts 2147 and 2136 households respectively. In Round 5, 2122 households were interviewed. In Round 6, 2100 households and Round 7, 1950 were interviewed. Round 8 has seen 1,881 households being interviewed. Round 9 counts 1871 households, Round 10 - 1668, Round 11 - 1666 , Round 12 - 1783, Round 13 - 1765, Round 14 - 1838, Round 15 - 1729, Round 16 - 1,795 , and Round 17 - 1,761 households. Weights are adjusted to be nationally representative in each round.

Geographic coverage

National

Analysis unit

• Households
• Individuals

Sampling procedure

The sample of the COVID-19 impact survey is a subsample of the Uganda National Panel Survey (UNPS) 2019/20 (wave 8). UNPS2019/20 interviewed 3098 households of which 2333 were in the urban area and 745 in the rural area. In the panel, households are asked to provide a phone number either of their own or of a reference person (e.g. neighbor, friends...) to be reached in case the households move from their original sample location. In wave 8, 2386 households provided a phone number. To obtain a nationally representative sample for the COVID-19 Impact Survey, a sample size of approximately 1,800 successfully interviewed households was targeted. However, to reach that target, a larger pool of households needed to be selected from the frame due to the non-contact and non-response common for telephone surveys. Thus, all the households in the 2019/20 round of the UNPS that had phone numbers for at least one household member, or a reference individual were included in the initial sample. This consisted of 2227 households, which is 72% of the UNPS 2019/20 sample. Starting in round 13 (phase 3), the original UHFPS sample was complimented with a refresher sample drawn from the Uganda National Household Survey (UNHS) 2020. The sample refresher intended to overcome the high nonresponse rates accrued with the succession of rounds of data collection and due to respondents’ fatigue. The target of the new additional sample was to reestablish the sample size from the first round of the survey, therefore 650 new households were drawn from the UNHS proportionally to attrition rates in the original strata.

Mode of data collection

Computer Assisted Telephone Interview [cati]

Research instrument

The COVID-19 survey had consisted of one main Household questionnaire per each round. The questionnaire is divided into several sections and the number of questions in each section varied accordingly.

ROUND 1: The Household Questionnaire for Round 1 provides information on demographics; knowledge and false beliefs regarding the spread of COVID-19; behavior and social distancing; access to basic services; employment; Agriculture; income loss; food security; concerns; coping/shocks; and social safety nets.

ROUND 2: The Household Questionnaire for Round 2 provides information on demographics; Perceptions Re: Efficacy of Government Actions; behavior and social distancing; access to basic services; employment; Agriculture; non-agricultural income; income loss; food security; credit; concerns; and social safety nets.

ROUND 3: The Household Questionnaire for Round 3 provides information on demographics; Perceptions Re: Efficacy of Government Actions behavior and social distancing; access to basic services; employment; Agriculture; non-agricultural income; income loss; food security; credit; concerns; and social safety nets.

ROUND 4: The Household Questionnaire for Round 4 provides information on demographics; Education; Perceptions Re: Efficacy of Government Actions behavior and social distancing; access to basic services; employment; Agriculture; non-agricultural income; income loss; food security; concerns; and social safety nets.

ROUND 5: The questionnaire for Round 5 provides information on demographics; Education; Childhood development (parental support at home); behavior and social distancing; access to basic services; assets; employment; Agriculture; non-agricultural income; income loss; food security; concerns; and social safety nets.

ROUND 6: The questionnaire for Round 6 provides information on demographics; Education; Childhood development (child behaviour and child discipline); behavior and social distancing; access to basic services; employment of the respondent and other household member; assets; Agriculture; non-agricultural income; income loss; food security; concerns; shocks and coping strategies; and social safety nets.

ROUND 7: The questionnaire for Round 7 provides information on demographics; Education; knowledge regarding the spread of COVID-19; perception on government action against COVID-19; behavior and social distancing; access; employment of the respondent and other household member; agriculture; non-agricultural business; food security; concerns; and social safety nets.

ROUND 8: The questionnaire for Round 8 provides the following information : Interview information; Interview result; Household Roster; Phone number roster; Education; Behavior and Social distancing; Access to essential goods and services; Access to health services; Employment respondent; Non-Agricultural Business; Income loss; Credit in the last 12 months; Coping Strategies; Food Insecurity Experience Scale; Food prices; Economic Sentiment; Climate.

ROUND 9: The questionnaire for Round 9 provides the following information : Interview information; Interview result; Household Roster; Health access - Main respondent; Vaccines - Main Respondent; Access to Essential Goods and Services; Access to Health services; Employment respondent; Non-Farm Enterprise; Concerns -Main Respondent; Commodities Prices; Food Insecurity Experience Scale.

ROUND 10: The questionnaire for Round 10 provides the following information : Interview information; Interview result; Household Roster; Health access - Main respondent; Source of income; Income loss; Access to Health services; Employment respondent; Non-Farm Enterprise; Commodities Prices; Food Insecurity Experience Scale; Safety nets; Economic Sentiments; Concerns on Ebola Virus; Parish Development Model; Concerns (Mental Health).

ROUND 11: The questionnaire for Round 11 provides the following information : Cover; Household roster update; Perceptions Re: Efficacy of Government Actions; Access; Health -Access main respondent; Behavior and Social Distancing; Employment respondent; Non_x0002_Agricultural Business; Income Loss; Commodities prices; Food Security; Concerns Regarding COVID-19/Ebola Impacts; Safety Nets; Agriculture : Post-planting;Crop harvest; Livestock; Interview Result.

ROUND 12: The questionnaire for Round 12 provides the following information : Interview information; Interview result; Household Roster; Health access; Behavior and Social distancing; Access to Health services; Employment respondent; Non-Farm Enterprise; Source of income; Income loss; Access to Credit and Loan characteristics; Food Insecurity Experience Scale; Concerns on Ebola Virus; Coping strategies; Commodity prices; Economic Sentiments; E-commerce and delivery services for food and E-commerce and online services.

ROUND 13: The questionnaire for Round 13 provides the following information : Interview information; Interview result; Household roster; Health access; Yellow fever; Access to essential goods and services; Employment respondent; Food Insecurity Experience

Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: Manufactured Products data was reported at 5.990 % in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 5.900 % for 2015. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: Manufactured Products data is updated yearly, averaging 6.390 % from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2016, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 12.300 % in 1994 and a record low of 5.000 % in 2004. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: Manufactured Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Most Favored Nation: Weighted Mean: Primary Products data was reported at 13.310 % in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 15.100 % for 2015. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Most Favored Nation: Weighted Mean: Primary Products data is updated yearly, averaging 13.645 % from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2016, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 22.700 % in 1994 and a record low of 7.530 % in 2003. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Most Favored Nation: Weighted Mean: Primary Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Weighted mean most favored nations tariff is the average of most favored nation rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: Primary Products data was reported at 15.690 % in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 15.770 % for 2015. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: Primary Products data is updated yearly, averaging 16.145 % from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2016, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 19.520 % in 1994 and a record low of 9.580 % in 2004. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: Primary Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank: Trade Tariffs. Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: Primary Products data was reported at 9.940 % in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 11.710 % for 2015. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: Primary Products data is updated yearly, averaging 10.400 % from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2016, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 17.350 % in 1994 and a record low of 5.420 % in 2003. Uganda UG: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: Primary Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank: Trade Tariffs. Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

Indonesia Export: Value: Iron: Uganda data was reported at 0.002 USD mn in Mar 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.284 USD mn for Feb 2015. Indonesia Export: Value: Iron: Uganda data is updated monthly, averaging 0.001 USD mn from May 2012 (Median) to Mar 2015, with 14 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.284 USD mn in Feb 2015 and a record low of 0.000 USD mn in Dec 2012. Indonesia Export: Value: Iron: Uganda data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Central Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Indonesia Premium Database’s Foreign Trade – Table ID.JAE024: Export: Commodities by Country: Iron.