A survey conducted in April and May 2023 revealed that around 55 percent of the companies that do business in the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) found it challenging to adapt to new or changing requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA). A further 45 percent of the survey respondents said it was challenging to increase the budget because of the changes in the data privacy laws.
A survey conducted in April and May 2023 revealed that around 35 percent of organizations in the United States and 40 percent of organizations in the United Kingdom pay higher costs for international data transfers due to data privacy regulations, but they also find it manageable. Furthermore, approximately 35 percent of respondents from both countries think the regulations encourage businesses by guaranteeing that the data will be safeguarded in other countries.
A survey conducted in April and May 2023 found that less than half of the surveyed organizations in the United States and the United Kingdom (UK) had completed selected actions to comply with state data privacy laws in the United States. Around 40 percent of the respondents had made a comparison of the United States' state-level privacy law frameworks. A further 30 percent said they were in the process of doing so. Furthermore, 41 percent of the respondents said they had updated privacy policies, while almost 30 percent were in the process of planning and conducting data assessments.
As of February 2025, the largest fine issued for violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the United Kingdom (UK) was more than 22 million euros, received by British Airways in October 2020. Another fine received by Marriott International Inc. in the same month was the second-highest in the UK and amounted to over 20 million euros.
This document details what personal data DfE processes about parents, carers and legal guardians. It also includes data processed about families.
The DfE personal information charter has details about the standards you can expect when we collect, hold or use your personal information.
This is because it would breach the first data protection principle as: a) it is not fair to disclose claimant personal details to the world and is likely to cause damage or distress. b) these details are not of sufficient interest to the public to warrant an intrusion into the privacy of the claimant. Please click the below web link to see the exemption in full. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/section/40 Breach of Patient confidentiality Please note that the identification of claimants is also a breach of the common law duty of confidence. A claimant who has been identified could make a claim against the NHSBSA or yourself for the disclosure of the confidential information. The information requested is therefore being withheld as it falls under the exemption in section 41(1) ‘Information provided in confidence’ of the Freedom of Information Act. Please click the below web link to see the exemption in full. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/section/41
This is the National Data Guardian’s (NDG’s) formal response to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport’s consultation Data: a new direction on the proposed reforms to data protection law in the UK.
This is not an exhaustive review of all the government’s proposals, but rather the NDG’s considerations and recommendations on those areas of the reforms that may impact the health and social care sector.
The appropriate use of data is essential to ensure continuous improvements in health and social care. The NDG is supportive of the government’s aim of building an improved data protection regime. As such, this response is intended to provide advice and feedback on areas of the consultation where the NDG believes further consideration might be necessary if the government is to achieve its stated aim.
A survey of UK young adults between 18 and 34 years in October 2023 found that ethnic minorities tend to exercise their data protection rights. Around 33 percent of respondents representing ethnic minorities said they had refused to provide their biometric data, compared to 22 percent of white respondents. Similarly, young people of color were more likely to ask an organization to stop using their personal information.
These assessments, in line with data protection legislation, assess the privacy impacts of the Animals in Science Regulation Unit’s e-Licensing system.
A survey conducted in April and May 2023 revealed that around a quarter of United States and United Kingdom organizations were highly concerned about data privacy law enforcement involving their company. A further 35 percent were worried about data breaches and other cybersecurity incidents. Dealing with high costs of privacy law compliance was a concern for approximately 20 percent of the respondents.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought global disruption to health, society and economy, including to the conduct of clinical research. In the European Union (EU), the legal and ethical framework for research is complex and divergent. Many challenges exist in relation to the interplay of the various applicable rules, particularly with respect to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This study aimed to gain insights into the experience of key clinical research stakeholders [investigators, ethics committees (ECs), and data protection officers (DPOs)/legal experts working with clinical research sponsors] across the EU and the UK on the main challenges related to data protection in clinical research before and during the pandemic.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Data collection occurred between April and December 2021. Survey data was analyzed descriptively, and the interviews underwent a framework analysis.Results and conclusionIn total, 191 respondents filled in the survey, of whom fourteen participated in the follow-up interviews. Out of the targeted 28 countries (EU and UK), 25 were represented in the survey. The majority of stakeholders were based in Western Europe. This study empirically elucidated numerous key legal and ethical issues related to GDPR compliance in the context of (cross-border) clinical research. It showed that the lack of legal harmonization remains the biggest challenge in the field, and that it is present not only at the level of the interplay of key EU legislative acts and national implementation of the GDPR, but also when it comes to interpretation at local, regional and institutional levels. Moreover, the role of ECs in data protection was further explored and possible ways forward for its normative delineation were discussed. According to the participants, the pandemic did not bring additional legal challenges. Although practical challenges (for instance, mainly related to the provision of information to patients) were high due to the globally enacted crisis measures, the key problematic issues on (cross-border) health research, interpretations of the legal texts and compliance strategies remained largely the same.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic brought global disruption to health, society and economy, including to the conduct of clinical research. In the European Union (EU), the legal and ethical framework for research is complex and divergent. Many challenges exist in relation to the interplay of the various applicable rules, particularly with respect to compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This study aimed to gain insights into the experience of key clinical research stakeholders [investigators, ethics committees (ECs), and data protection officers (DPOs)/legal experts working with clinical research sponsors] across the EU and the UK on the main challenges related to data protection in clinical research before and during the pandemic.Materials and methodsThe study consisted of an online survey and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Data collection occurred between April and December 2021. Survey data was analyzed descriptively, and the interviews underwent a framework analysis.Results and conclusionIn total, 191 respondents filled in the survey, of whom fourteen participated in the follow-up interviews. Out of the targeted 28 countries (EU and UK), 25 were represented in the survey. The majority of stakeholders were based in Western Europe. This study empirically elucidated numerous key legal and ethical issues related to GDPR compliance in the context of (cross-border) clinical research. It showed that the lack of legal harmonization remains the biggest challenge in the field, and that it is present not only at the level of the interplay of key EU legislative acts and national implementation of the GDPR, but also when it comes to interpretation at local, regional and institutional levels. Moreover, the role of ECs in data protection was further explored and possible ways forward for its normative delineation were discussed. According to the participants, the pandemic did not bring additional legal challenges. Although practical challenges (for instance, mainly related to the provision of information to patients) were high due to the globally enacted crisis measures, the key problematic issues on (cross-border) health research, interpretations of the legal texts and compliance strategies remained largely the same.
A survey conducted in April and May 2023 among companies that do business in the European Union and the United Kingdom (UK) found that over half of the respondents, 53 percent, felt very prepared for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A further 35 percent of the companies believed they were moderately prepared, while 10 percent said they were slightly ready to comply with the EU and UK privacy legislations.
According to a survey of adults in the United Kingdom (UK) from January to February 2024, around seven in ten respondents asked an organization to stop sending them marketing communication through electronic means. Furthermore, over 30 percent refused to provide an organization with biometric data.
Success.ai’s Company Data Solutions provide businesses with powerful, enterprise-ready B2B company datasets, enabling you to unlock insights on over 28 million verified company profiles. Our solution is ideal for organizations seeking accurate and detailed B2B contact data, whether you’re targeting large enterprises, mid-sized businesses, or small business contact data.
Success.ai offers B2B marketing data across industries and geographies, tailored to fit your specific business needs. With our white-glove service, you’ll receive curated, ready-to-use company datasets without the hassle of managing data platforms yourself. Whether you’re looking for UK B2B data or global datasets, Success.ai ensures a seamless experience with the most accurate and up-to-date information in the market.
API Features:
Why Choose Success.ai’s Company Data Solution? At Success.ai, we prioritize quality and relevancy. Every company profile is AI-validated for a 99% accuracy rate and manually reviewed to ensure you're accessing actionable and GDPR-compliant data. Our price match guarantee ensures you receive the best deal on the market, while our white-glove service provides personalized assistance in sourcing and delivering the data you need.
Why Choose Success.ai?
Our database spans 195 countries and covers 28 million public and private company profiles, with detailed insights into each company’s structure, size, funding history, and key technologies. We provide B2B company data for businesses of all sizes, from small business contact data to large corporations, with extensive coverage in regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.
Comprehensive Data Points: Success.ai delivers in-depth information on each company, with over 15 data points, including:
Company Name: Get the full legal name of the company. LinkedIn URL: Direct link to the company's LinkedIn profile. Company Domain: Website URL for more detailed research. Company Description: Overview of the company’s services and products. Company Location: Geographic location down to the city, state, and country. Company Industry: The sector or industry the company operates in. Employee Count: Number of employees to help identify company size. Technologies Used: Insights into key technologies employed by the company, valuable for tech-based outreach. Funding Information: Track total funding and the most recent funding dates for investment opportunities. Maximize Your Sales Potential: With Success.ai’s B2B contact data and company datasets, sales teams can build tailored lists of target accounts, identify decision-makers, and access real-time company intelligence. Our curated datasets ensure you’re always focused on high-value leads—those who are most likely to convert into clients. Whether you’re conducting account-based marketing (ABM), expanding your sales pipeline, or looking to improve your lead generation strategies, Success.ai offers the resources you need to scale your business efficiently.
Tailored for Your Industry: Success.ai serves multiple industries, including technology, healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and more. Our B2B marketing data solutions are particularly valuable for businesses looking to reach professionals in key sectors. You’ll also have access to small business contact data, perfect for reaching new markets or uncovering high-growth startups.
From UK B2B data to contacts across Europe and Asia, our datasets provide global coverage to expand your business reach and identify new...
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Reasons for data donation subscale correlations, and means, standard deviations and Cronbach’s Alpha for subscales of Reasons for Data Donation.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Correlation of each of the reasons for data donation scales, while partialling out other two scales, with Prosocial Tendencies Measure, Self-Report Altruism Scale and Interpersonal Reactivity Index.
A survey conducted in April and May 2023 among companies in the United States and the United Kingdom (UK) showed that seven in 10 organizations had designated an internal manager or owner to lead and implement data privacy measures. Additionally, almost 60 percent conducted regular training of all staff on data privacy and compliance.
Data Security Market Size 2025-2029
The data security market size is forecast to increase by USD 5.85 billion at a CAGR of 16.4% between 2024 and 2029.
The market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing awareness and stringent regulations surrounding data protection. With the exponential rise in digital transformation and the subsequent generation of vast amounts of sensitive data, organizations are prioritizing data security to mitigate risks and ensure compliance with data protection laws. A key trend driving market growth is the increasing focus toward data security automation. This approach not only enhances security measures but also reduces the workload on IT teams. However, challenges persist, particularly in the areas of system integration and interoperability. As businesses adopt multiple security solutions, ensuring seamless integration and communication between them becomes crucial for effective data protection. Companies seeking to capitalize on market opportunities and navigate challenges effectively should prioritize interoperability and invest in solutions that offer automated data security features. By doing so, they can strengthen their security posture, mitigate risks, and build customer trust.
What will be the Size of the Data Security Market during the forecast period?
Request Free SampleThe market is experiencing growth, driven by the increasing volumes of digital data and the proliferation of information applications across various industries. According to industry associations and national statistical offices, global IT infrastructure spending is projected to reach new heights, fueling demand for advanced security solutions. Internet penetration continues to expand, leading to an increased attack surface for cybercriminals. Consequently, next-generation firewalls and advanced threat protection systems have gained significant traction, becoming essential components of organizations' IT defense strategies. Cloud solutions have also emerged as a popular choice due to their flexibility, scalability, and cost savings. Financial statements of leading companies in the sector indicate a positive trend, with revenue growth and expanding customer bases. Overall, the market is poised for continued expansion as businesses prioritize safeguarding their digital assets.
How is this Data Security Industry segmented?
The data security industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. DeploymentOn-premisesCloud-basedTypeLarge enterpriseSMEEnd-userBFSIHealthcareIT and telecommunicationsGovernmentOthersGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeFranceGermanyItalyUKAPACChinaIndiaJapanSouth KoreaSouth AmericaMiddle East and Africa
By Deployment Insights
The on-premises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.On-premises servers represent the traditional enterprise computing model, where businesses own and manage their data security infrastructure on their premises. This includes servers, storage units, and other related hardware. Companies are responsible for purchasing, maintaining, and securing these components at secure and climate-controlled sites. IT support is required for managing the equipment and ensuring optimal performance. With on-premises servers, businesses retain complete control over data security. They set user access policies, install firewalls, antivirus software, and security patches, and safeguard against data breaches. Key data security solutions include Next-Generation Firewalls, Advanced Threat Protection, IT infrastructure, Cloud solutions, Endpoint security, Cyber hygiene practices, Business Continuity Plan, and Data Auditing. Data volumes continue to grow due to digitalization trends, digital data generation, and the increasing use of digital devices, IoT devices, and cloud computing. Data security concerns include financial loss, intellectual property loss, business disruption, and regulatory compliance. Companies of all sizes, from large enterprises to emerging startups, require data security measures to protect sensitive data from data thefts, security breaches, identity thefts, and phishing attempts. Data risk assessment, minimization, and real-time alerts are essential for effective data security management.
Get a glance at the market report of share of various segments Request Free Sample
The On-premises segment was valued at USD 2.63 billion in 2019 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.
Regional Analysis
APAC is estimated to contribute 33% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.Technavio’s analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.
A study, conducted in April 2024 among digital services companies in the United Kingdom (UK) showed that 63 percent of them had age assurance methods in place. Furthermore, 26 percent said they had none, and 11 percent were not aware of such measures.
A survey conducted in April and May 2023 revealed that around 55 percent of the companies that do business in the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK) found it challenging to adapt to new or changing requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) or Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA). A further 45 percent of the survey respondents said it was challenging to increase the budget because of the changes in the data privacy laws.