This statistic shows the market size for external providers of professional development for teachers of K-12 education in the United States from 2015 to 2020. In 2020, an estimated 4.1 billion U.S. dollars will be spent on external providers of professional development for K-12 education in the United States.

Roughly 1.2 million participants in professional development courses in Germany in 2020 came from the manufacturing sector. 1.1 million worked in commerce, hospitality and transport.

Historical Dataset of Career Development Center is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2003-2023)

This statistic shows the result of a survey where school teachers in the U.S. were asked to answer the following question: "Within the next 12 months, in which of the following areas would you personally like to participate in professional development (PD)?"

In 2016, 57% of the responding teachers said that they were most interested in professional development in instructional strategies in their subject areas.

Data from a school-level randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Double Check professional development model, focused on improving teachers' cultural responsivity and student engagement. Data were developed to evaluate the multi-component whole-school Double Check model, testing the combined impacts of school-wide data-based decision-making, along with staff professional development on culturally responsive practices, and classroom coaching using the Double Check version of the Classroom Check-up. Detailed descriptions of this model and intervention activities can be found in Bradshaw et al (2018; a description of the model from a prior trial) and Pas et al (2022; analysis of intervention activities from the present trial). A total of 41 middle school from two states in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States participated. Schools were recruited to participate in four cohorts. The first school-years of participation for these cohorts were 2015-2016, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019, respectively. Teacher recruitment sessions were generally held in the weeks leading up to beginning of the school year (during faculty professional development days). A total of 352 teachers consented to participate in the RCT. Following Fall baseline data collection for each of the four cohorts, schools were randomly assigned to receive the Double Check model (n = 19) or to the comparison group (n = 22; i.e., business as usual). Recruited schools were assigned into paired matches within their cohort based on their school-level demographic characteristics and baseline data; one school in each pair was randomly assigned to each group to ensure balance across conditions. Intervention activities took place during the first year of each school's participation in the trial. During year 2, intervention schools also received two professional development “booster” sessions. These sessions reviewed the Double Check model and components of culturally responsive teaching, and facilitated action planning for the second academic year for teachers’ implementation of culturally responsive strategies. Data collection occurred at baseline (pre-test; Fall of year 1), post-test (Spring of year 1), and follow-up (Spring of year 2). Data from all cohorts and time points are included in this submission. Follow-up data are missing for the fourth cohort of schools, as their follow-up time point coincided with Spring of 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic interfered with data collection within schools. At the completion of the two years of participation (one intervention year, one follow up year for data collection), comparison schools received all Double Check PD materials and individual staff members received training in the coaching model.

This statistic shows the distribution of use of professional development providers for K-12 teachers in the United States in 2014, by type of professional development provided. In 2014, at 41 percent of service providers, independent consultants were used most often for professional development of teaching skills.

Success.ai’s Education Industry Data with B2B Contact Data for Education Professionals Worldwide enables businesses to connect with educators, administrators, and decision-makers in educational institutions across the globe. With access to over 170 million verified professional profiles, this dataset includes crucial contact details for key education professionals, including school principals, department heads, and education directors.

Whether you’re targeting K-12 educators, university faculty, or educational administrators, Success.ai ensures your outreach is effective and efficient, providing the accurate data needed to build meaningful connections.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Education Professionals Data?

1. Comprehensive Contact Information
2. Access verified work emails, direct phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles for educators, administrators, and education leaders worldwide.

3. AI-driven validation guarantees 99% accuracy, ensuring the highest level of reliability for your outreach.

4. Global Reach Across Educational Roles

5. Includes profiles of K-12 teachers, university professors, education directors, and school administrators.

6. Covers regions such as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East.

7. Continuously Updated Datasets

8. Real-time updates ensure that you’re working with the most current contact information, keeping your outreach relevant and timely.

9. Ethical and Compliant

10. Success.ai’s data is fully GDPR, CCPA, and privacy regulation-compliant, ensuring ethical data usage in all your outreach efforts.

Data Highlights:

• 170M+ Verified Professional Profiles: Includes educators and administrators across various levels of education.
• 50M Work Emails: Verified and AI-validated emails for seamless communication.
• 30M Company Profiles: Rich insights into educational institutions, supporting detailed targeting.
• 700M Global Professional Profiles: Enriched datasets for comprehensive outreach across the education sector.

Key Features of the Dataset:

1. Education Decision-Maker Profiles
2. Identify and connect with decision-makers at educational institutions, including principals, department heads, and education directors.

3. Reach K-12 educators, higher education faculty, and administrative professionals with relevant needs.

4. Advanced Filters for Precision Targeting

5. Filter by educational level, subject area, location, and specific roles to tailor your outreach campaigns for precise results.

6. AI-Driven Enrichment

7. Profiles are enriched with actionable data to provide valuable insights, ensuring your outreach efforts are impactful and effective.

Strategic Use Cases:

1. Educational Product and Service Marketing
2. Promote educational tools, software, or services to decision-makers in schools, colleges, and universities.

3. Build relationships with educators to present curriculum solutions, digital learning platforms, and teaching resources.

4. Recruitment and Talent Acquisition

5. Target educational institutions and administrators with recruitment solutions or staffing services for teaching and support staff.

6. Engage with HR professionals in the education sector to promote job openings and talent acquisition services.

7. Professional Development Programs

8. Reach educators and administrators to offer professional development courses, certifications, or training programs.

9. Provide online learning solutions to enhance the skills of educators worldwide.

10. Research and Educational Partnerships

11. Connect with education leaders for research collaborations, institutional partnerships, and academic initiatives.

12. Foster relationships with decision-makers to support joint ventures in the education sector.

Why Choose Success.ai?

1. Best Price Guarantee

2. Success.ai offers high-quality, verified data at the best possible prices, making it a cost-effective solution for your outreach needs.

3. Seamless Integration

4. Integrate this verified contact data into your CRM using APIs or download it in your preferred format for streamlined use.

5. Data Accuracy with AI Validation

6. With AI-driven validation, Success.ai ensures 99% accuracy for all data, providing you with reliable and up-to-date information.

7. Customizable and Scalable Solutions

8. Tailor data to specific education sectors or roles, making it easy to target the right contacts for your campaigns.

APIs for Enhanced Functionality:

1. Data Enrichment API

2. Enhance existing records in your database with verified contact data for education professionals.

3. Lead Generation API

4. Automate lead generation campaigns for educational services and products, ensuring your marketing efforts are more efficient.

Leverage Success.ai’s B2B Contact Data for Education Professionals Worldwide to connect with educators, administrators, and decision-makers in the education sector. With veri...

This dataset is compiled by the Digital Development Department to provide gender statistics for training participants, and to compile gender statistics information on information technology education and training from 2023, with the hope to provide data users with gender differences in participation in different courses for analysis.

Success.ai’s Education Industry Data provides access to comprehensive profiles of global professionals in the education sector. Sourced from over 700 million verified LinkedIn profiles, this dataset includes actionable insights and verified contact details for teachers, school administrators, university leaders, and other decision-makers. Whether your goal is to collaborate with educational institutions, market innovative solutions, or recruit top talent, Success.ai ensures your efforts are supported by accurate, enriched, and continuously updated data.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Education Industry Data? 1. Comprehensive Professional Profiles Access verified LinkedIn profiles of teachers, school principals, university administrators, curriculum developers, and education consultants. AI-validated profiles ensure 99% accuracy, reducing bounce rates and enabling effective communication. 2. Global Coverage Across Education Sectors Includes professionals from public schools, private institutions, higher education, and educational NGOs. Covers markets across North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Africa for a truly global reach. 3. Continuously Updated Dataset Real-time updates reflect changes in roles, organizations, and industry trends, ensuring your outreach remains relevant and effective. 4. Tailored for Educational Insights Enriched profiles include work histories, academic expertise, subject specializations, and leadership roles for a deeper understanding of the education sector.

Data Highlights: 700M+ Verified LinkedIn Profiles: Access a global network of education professionals. 100M+ Work Emails: Direct communication with teachers, administrators, and decision-makers. Enriched Professional Histories: Gain insights into career trajectories, institutional affiliations, and areas of expertise. Industry-Specific Segmentation: Target professionals in K-12 education, higher education, vocational training, and educational technology.

Key Features of the Dataset: 1. Education Sector Profiles Identify and connect with teachers, professors, academic deans, school counselors, and education technologists. Engage with individuals shaping curricula, institutional policies, and student success initiatives. 2. Detailed Institutional Insights Leverage data on school sizes, student demographics, geographic locations, and areas of focus. Tailor outreach to align with institutional goals and challenges. 3. Advanced Filters for Precision Targeting Refine searches by region, subject specialty, institution type, or leadership role. Customize campaigns to address specific needs, such as professional development or technology adoption. 4. AI-Driven Enrichment Enhanced datasets include actionable details for personalized messaging and targeted engagement. Highlight educational milestones, professional certifications, and key achievements.

Strategic Use Cases: 1. Product Marketing and Outreach Promote educational technology, learning platforms, or training resources to teachers and administrators. Engage with decision-makers driving procurement and curriculum development. 2. Collaboration and Partnerships Identify institutions for collaborations on research, workshops, or pilot programs. Build relationships with educators and administrators passionate about innovative teaching methods. 3. Talent Acquisition and Recruitment Target HR professionals and academic leaders seeking faculty, administrative staff, or educational consultants. Support hiring efforts for institutions looking to attract top talent in the education sector. 4. Market Research and Strategy Analyze trends in education systems, curriculum development, and technology integration to inform business decisions. Use insights to adapt products and services to evolving educational needs.

Why Choose Success.ai? 1. Best Price Guarantee Access industry-leading Education Industry Data at unmatched pricing for cost-effective campaigns and strategies. 2. Seamless Integration Easily integrate verified data into CRMs, recruitment platforms, or marketing systems using downloadable formats or APIs. 3. AI-Validated Accuracy Depend on 99% accurate data to reduce wasted outreach and maximize engagement rates. 4. Customizable Solutions Tailor datasets to specific educational fields, geographic regions, or institutional types to meet your objectives.

Strategic APIs for Enhanced Campaigns: 1. Data Enrichment API Enrich existing records with verified education professional profiles to enhance engagement and targeting. 2. Lead Generation API Automate lead generation for a consistent pipeline of qualified professionals in the education sector. Success.ai’s Education Industry Data enables you to connect with educators, administrators, and decision-makers transforming global...

Snapshot img

US Corporate Training Market Size 2024-2028

The US corporate training market size is forecast to increase by USD 14.43 billion billion at a CAGR of 6.78% between 2023 and 2028.

US Corporate Training Market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the emergence of cost-effective e-learning training modules and the integration of advanced technologies such as IoT and wearable devices. These innovations enable more efficient and accessible professional development opportunities, with mobile applications and digital content becoming increasingly popular. Furthermore, the growing prominence of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in corporate learning is transforming traditional training methods, offering flexible and affordable options for employees. As the digital workplace continues to evolve, the demand for soft skills training, data analytics, and virtual assistant technologies is also on the rise.
This dynamic market presents both opportunities and challenges for businesses, requiring strategic investments in digital content and a commitment to staying abreast of the latest trends and technologies.

What will be the size of the US Corporate Training Market during the forecast period?

Request Free Sample

In today's business landscape, the importance of continuous learning and training solutions cannot be overstated. As companies navigate digital transformation and the future of work, they recognize the need for a skilled and agile workforce. Training programs have become essential for business growth, employee development, and talent retention. Training content development is a key focus area, with emerging technologies driving innovation in this space. Learning agility, training impact, and training effectiveness are critical metrics for assessing the success of these initiatives. Skills gap analysis and skill development are also important aspects of training strategies, as organizations strive to stay competitive in the knowledge economy.
Employee productivity and organizational effectiveness are directly linked to training evaluation methods. Learning resources, digital literacy, and learning platforms are essential tools for enabling employee performance and workforce planning. The future of work and future skills are constantly evolving, making it important for companies to stay informed and adapt to changing trends. Training assessment and training metrics are crucial for measuring the success of these initiatives and making data-driven decisions. Learning experiences and learning technologies are also important considerations for talent acquisition and employee development. By investing in comprehensive training programs, organizations can foster a culture of lifelong learning and enhance their overall competitiveness.

How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

Product

  Technical courses
  Non-technical courses


Method

  Blended learning
  Offline learning
  Online learning


End-user

  Manufacturing
  Healthcare
  BFSI
  IT
  Retail
  Education
  Government
  Energy


Training Purpose

  Leadership Development
  Compliance
  Skill Development


Company Size

  Small Businesses
  Medium Businesses
  Large Enterprises


Geography

  North America

    US


  Europe



  Middle East and Africa



  APAC



  South America



  Rest of World (ROW)

By Product Insights

The technical courses segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

In the corporate training landscape of the US, technical courses hold significant importance in equipping employees with industry-specific knowledge and skills. These courses encompass various subjects such as operations, maintenance, and equipment training for new recruits, general operational training for process control, product technology, and safety practices, practical-based product applications and troubleshooting, compliance training, risk management, and safe work practices. companies catering to the corporate training market in the US provide a diverse range of blended, offline, and online technical courses to meet the unique requirements of businesses. Certifications offered upon course completion further enhance the learners' profiles, particularly in technical subjects.

Businesses increasingly rely on these companies to ensure their workforce is well-versed in the latest technologies and practices. Additionally, training methods such as coaching and mentoring, on-the-job training, and data-driven training are integrated into these courses to foster a continuous learning culture. Human resources departments, C-suite executives, and gove

Local Law 174 enacted in 2016 requires the Department of Education of the New York City School District to submit to the Council an annual report concerning Career and Technical Education programs in New York city schools. This report provides information about Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs and students in CTE programs and CTE-designated high schools, as defined in Local Law 174 as reported through the 2018-2019 STARS database. CTE Designated High Schools are those in which all students are engaged in NYC DOE-approved CTE sequences of instruction that integrate rigorous academic study with workforce skills in specific career pathways. It is important to note that schools self-report their scheduling information in STARS. The report also includes information regarding the number and ratio of certified CTE instructors. This report consists of seven tabs: 1. CTE Program Characteristics and Enrollment, including number of staff that attended a CTE PD 2. Number and percentage of students at each high school in a CTE program 3. Number and percentage of students in each Community School District in a CTE program 4. CTE application and admission - CTE designated schools only 5. Graduation rates - CTE designated schools only 6. Graduation rates - CTE designated schools only (by Community School District) 7. CTE Full-Time and Part-Time Teachers CTE Program Characteristics and Enrollment "This tab includes the following information for each high school-level CTE program: - high school name - CTE designation - name of the program - the industry for which the program prepares students - the number of industry partners associated with the program - CTE program approval status through the New York state department of education’s CTE approval process - grade levels served by such program - number of students enrolled in such program - number of school staff attending professional development events held by CTE" Number and percentage of students at each high school in a CTE program This tab includes the number and percentage of students at each high school with a CTE program, disaggregated by: student race and ethnicity; student gender; student special education status; student English Language Learner status; student economic need status (poverty); and communicty school district. Data on students with disabilities and English language learners are as of the end of the 2018-19 school year.

Career and Technical Education Programs in Public School Districts, 2016-17 (FRSS 108) is a data collection that is part of the Fast Response Survey System (FRSS) program; program data are available since 1998-99 at . FRSS 108 (https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/index.asp) is a cross-sectional data collection that provides nationally representative data on career and technical education (CTE) programs. Public local education agencies (LEAs) instructing either grades 11 or 12 in the 50 United States and the District of Columbia were sampled. The study was conducted using mailed questionnaires that could be completed on paper or online. The data collection's response rate was 86 percent. Key statistics produced from FRSS 108 include data on the entities that provide the CTE programs, the locations at which the CTE programs are offered, work-based learning activities and employer involvement in CTE programs, barriers to the district offering CTE programs, barriers to student participation in CTE programs, and the extent to which various factors influence the district's decisions on whether to add or phase out CTE programs.

See "About" for field info. This dataset shows the percent of employees who attended 5+ hours of training by department.

The Elementary School Math Professional Development Impact Evaluation (Elementary School Math PD Evaluation) is a data collection that is part of the Professional Development Impact Program (PD Impact). Elementary School Math PD Evaluation https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/projects/evaluation/tq_mathpd.asp examines the implementation and impact of the Math Professional Development (PD) program, by means of collecting fourth-grade teachers' content knowledge, classroom practices, and their student's achievement for one academic year. Two-hundred such volunteer teachers from six local education agencies (LEAs) were recruited to be randomly assigned to either an experimental or control group. Teachers in the experimental group were given the PD intervention, whereas teachers in the control group engaged in their LEAs' and schools' standard PD regimen over the 2013-14 academic year. At the end of the experimental period, a survey was then administered to obtain teacher background information for covariate use in the impact analyses. Key statistics produced from Elementary School Math PD Evaluation include, inter alia, the implementation of the PD program and its impact on the participating teachers' students' achievement in the classroom.

Evaluation of the World Links Teacher Professional Development Program

This statistic shows the result of a survey where school principals in the U.S. were asked to answer the following question: "Within the next 12 months, in which of the following areas would you personally like to participate in professional development (PD)?"

In 2016, 62 percent of the respondents said that they would like to participate in professional development around strategies for leading and motivating staff.

The SOLution-oriented, STudent-Initiated, Computationally-Enriched (SOLSTICE) NSF Award Details approach is a teaching method for improving graduate student training in data-intensive fields. The approach seeks to enhance students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes in data sciences to solve complex problems, think critically, and effectively communicate across inter-generational, trans-disciplinary research teams. Using a data-intensive, project-based learning approach, graduate students work collaboratively to design, evaluate, and disseminate research in team environments. As data scientists, these students will learn how to pose research questions, translate information into potential actions, develop data collection, analysis, and visualization schemes and protocols, and exchange information, data methods, and results tailored to various audiences. Educational resources developed during this study will then be available to guide future faculty development and training processes. Read more here: Visit Naumova Labs' SOLSTICE Information Page

The Teaching and Learning International Survey, 2013 (TALIS:13), is a study that is part of the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) program. TALIS:13 (https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/talis/) is a cross-sectional survey that is designed to collect information about the teaching workforce, teaching as a profession, and the learning environments of schools. The study will be conducted through questionnaires for teachers and school administrators. Teachers and school administrators in lower secondary schools (Grades 7, 8, and 9) were sampled. Key statistics produced from TALIS:13 include information on teacher and principal background and characteristics, teacher and principal professional development, school leadership and management, teacher appraisal and feedback, teachers' instructional beliefs and pedagogical practices, school climate and ethos, student characteristics as perceived by the teacher, and teacher efficacy and job satisfaction.

LU: All Education Staff Compensation: Total: % of Total Expenditure in Public Institutions data was reported at 74.309 % in 2014. This records an increase from the previous number of 72.498 % for 2013. LU: All Education Staff Compensation: Total: % of Total Expenditure in Public Institutions data is updated yearly, averaging 71.926 % from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2014, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 74.309 % in 2014 and a record low of 71.271 % in 2001. LU: All Education Staff Compensation: Total: % of Total Expenditure in Public Institutions data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Luxembourg – Table LU.World Bank.WDI: Education Statistics. All staff (teacher and non-teachers) compensation is expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programs, and other allowances and benefits.; ; United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Institute for Statistics.; Median;

The 2015-16 National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS) is a redesign of the Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS); SASS program data is available since 1987-88 at . NTPS will replace SASS as one of the key sources of nationally representative data on a range of important education topics including out-of-field teaching, school decision making, professional development, teacher and principal evaluation, and career paths of educators and administrators. The repeated cross-sectional design of NTPS allows tracking of trends on these topics over time. The survey is conducted through a combination of online and paper questionnaires. The sample includes teachers, principals, and schools, and is nationally representative.