To access parcel information:Enter an address or zoom in by using the +/- tools or your mouse scroll wheel. Parcels will draw when zoomed in.Click on a parcel to display a popup with information about that parcel.Click the "Basemap" button to display background aerial imagery.From the "Layers" button you can turn map features on and off.Complete Help (PDF)Parcel Legend:Full Map LegendAbout this ViewerThis viewer displays land property boundaries from assessor parcel maps across Massachusetts. Each parcel is linked to selected descriptive information from assessor databases. Data for all 351 cities and towns are the standardized "Level 3" tax parcels served by MassGIS. More details ...Read about and download parcel dataUpdatesV 1.1: Added 'Layers' tab. (2018)V 1.2: Reformatted popup to use HTML table for columns and made address larger. (Jan 2019)V 1.3: Added 'Download Parcel Data by City/Town' option to list of layers. This box is checked off by default but when activated a user can identify anywhere and download data for that entire city/town, except Boston. (March 14, 2019)V 1.4: Data for Boston is included in the "Level 3" standardized parcels layer. (August 10, 2020)V 1.4 MassGIS, EOTSS 2021

This is a MD iMAP hosted service layer. Find more information at http://imap.maryland.gov. This layer contains the boundaries and IDs of the Maryland tax maps produced by Maryland Department of Planning. Tax maps - also known as assessment maps - property maps or parcel maps - are a graphic representation of real property showing and defining individual property boundaries in relationship to contiguous real property. Last Updated: Feature Service Layer Link: https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/PlanningCadastre/MD_PropertyData/MapServer ADDITIONAL LICENSE TERMS: The Spatial Data and the information therein (collectively "the Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind either expressed implied or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct indirect incidental consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.

Web map for City Properties and Facilities in support of the Land & Building Management System

This Image Service of Maryland Property Data allows for the manipulation of the display properties of the Statewide Tax Maps dataset. This is a MD iMAP hosted service. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Image Service Link: https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/PlanningCadastre/MD_PropertyData/ImageServer

OSA web map to view State of Colorado property data

This layer contains the boundaries and IDs of the Maryland tax maps produced by Maryland Department of Planning. Tax maps, also known as assessment maps, property maps or parcel maps, are a graphic representation of real property showing and defining individual property boundaries in relationship to contiguous real property.

These data were compiled to demonstrate new predictive mapping approaches and provide comprehensive gridded 30-meter resolution soil property maps for the Colorado River Basin above Hoover Dam. Random forest models related environmental raster layers representing soil forming factors with field samples to render predictive maps that interpolate between sample locations. Maps represented soil pH, texture fractions (sand, silt clay, fine sand, very fine sand), rock, electrical conductivity (ec), gypsum, CaCO3, sodium adsorption ratio (sar), available water capacity (awc), bulk density (dbovendry), erodibility (kwfact), and organic matter (om) at 7 depths (0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 100, and 200 cm) as well as depth to restrictive layer (resdept) and surface rock size and cover. Accuracy and error estimated using a 10-fold cross validation indicated a range of model performances with coefficient of variation (R2) for models ranging from 0.20 to 0.76 with mean of 0.52 and a standard deviation of 0.12. Models of pH, om and ec had the best accuracy (R2 > 0.6). Most texture fractions, CaCO3, and SAR models had R2 values from 0.5-0.6. Models of kwfact, dbovendry, resdept, rock models, gypsum and awc had R2 values from 0.4-0.5 excepting near surface models which tended to perform better. Very fine sands and 200 cm estimates for other models generally performed poorly (R2 from 0.2-0.4), and sample size for the 200 cm models was too low for reliable model building. More than 90% of the soils data used was sampled since 2000, but some older samples are included. Uncertainty estimates were also developed by creating relative prediction intervals, which allow end users to evaluate uncertainty easily.

To access the tax lot layer you will need to contact the county Assessor's office. ORMAP is a statewide digital cadastral base map that is publicly accessible, continually maintained, supports the Oregon property tax system, supports a multi-purpose land information system, strives to comply with appropriate state and national standards, and will continue to be improved over time.

MassGIS' standardized assessors’ parcel mapping data set contains property (land lot) boundaries and database information from each community's assessor.The data were developed through a competitive procurement funded by MassGIS. Each community in the Commonwealth was bid on by one or more vendors and the unit of work awarded was a city or town. The specification for this work was Level 3 of the MassGIS Digital Parcel Standard.This map service contains three feature classes and one table.Feature service also available.See the datalayer page for full details.

This data set contains a shapefile of a digitized map of the land parcel information of the original properties of the Uruara colonization site, Para, Brazil, acquired from the Instituto de Colonizacao e Reforma Agraria, or the Colonization and Agrarian Reform Institute (INCRA). The Uruara settlement geometry was initially designed by INCRA, and consists of mostly 100 hectare lots (400 x 2500 meters, and 500 x 2000 meters), running north and south of the Trans-Amazon Highway, as a fine network of small, narrow rectangles. The other parcels in the landscape are the so-called glebas that range up to 3,000 hectares.

The map was in the form of a paper map without a projection (a spherical geographic coordinate system) in the South American 1969 datum (SAD 1969). This paper map was digitized in Environmental Science Research Institute (ESRI) ArcInfo 8.1 using a digitizing table, and the digital cadastral data were geo-referenced and projected to match the Universal Transverse Mercator projection (Zone 22 South, World Geodetic System 1984 datum) of Landsat imagery (Landsat.org). There is one compressed (*.zip) file with this data set.

MassGIS' standardized ("Level 3") property tax parcel mapping data set was developed through a competitive procurement funded by MassGIS. Each community in the Commonwealth was bid on by one or more vendors and the unit of work awarded was a city or town. The specification for this work was Level 3 of the MassGIS Digital Parcel Standard. Standardization of assessor parcel mapping is complete for all 351 Massachusetts' cities and towns. MassGIS is now incorporating updates from municipalities into the database. This hosted feature layer is exported from MassGIS' internal database of the feature class GISDATA.L3_TAXPAR_POLY_ASSESS, which links L3_TAXPAR_POLY and L3_ASSESS. The export includes the expression: (POLY_TYPE IN ('FEE', 'TAX')) OR (POLY_TYPE IN ('ROW', 'PRIV_ROW', 'RAIL_ROW', 'WATER') AND PROP_ID IS NOT NULL) It contains several fields from GISDATA.L3_ASSESS and stacked polygons where multiple assessor records link to a parcel. It contains features that do not have an associated record in GISDATA.L3_ASSESS, except for rights of way and water bodies. ROWs and water bodies with a non-null PROP_ID are included. The data in this feature layer is used for the popups in the Massachusetts Interactive Property Map. See full data descriptionA hosted tile layer will draw very quickly at map scale of 1:18,056 (level 15) to 1:564 (level 20).

The DC Office of the Chief Financial Officer (OCFO), Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR), Real Property Tax Administration (RPTA) values all real property in the District of Columbia. This public interactive Real Property Assessment map application accompanies the OCFO MyTax DC and OTR websites. Use this mapping application to search for and view all real property, assessment valuation data, assessment neighborhood areas and sub-areas, detailed assessment information, and many real property valuation reports by various political and administrative areas. View by other administrative areas such as DC Wards, ANCs, DC Squares, and by specific real property characteristics such as property type and/or sale date. If you have questions, comments, or suggestions regarding the Real Property Assessment Map, contact the Real Property Assessment Division GIS Program at (202) 442-6484 or maps.title@dc.gov.

We are also including tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). There are approximately 200 records that don't join to the spatial parcel file and some additional that are null in the spatial parcel file, altogether around 560 total. This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary:Attribute LabelDefinitionSourceTAX_IDUnique 26 character property tax identification numberOnondaga County PlanningPRINTKEYAbbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot)Onondaga County PlanningADDRESSNUMProperty’s physical street addressOnondaga County PlanningADDRESSNAMProperty’s physical street nameOnondaga County PlanningTAX_ID_1City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping)City of Syracuse - AssessmentSBLProperty Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot)City of Syracuse - AssessmentPNUMBRProperty Number (10 digit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentStNumParcel street numberCity of Syracuse - AssessmentStNameParcel street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentFullAddressStreet number and street nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentZipParcel zip codeCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_1Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_2Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - Assessmentdesc_3Lot description including dimensionsCity of Syracuse - AssessmentSHAPE_IND City of Syracuse - AssessmentLUC_parcelNew York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htmCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLU_parcelNew York State property type classification nameCity of Syracuse - AssessmentLUCat_OldLegacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc.NAland_avLand assessed valueCity of Syracuse - Assessmenttotal_avFull assessed valueCity of Syracuse - AssessmentOwnerProperty owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd1_OwnPOBoxProperty owner mailing address (PO Box)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd2_OwnStAddProperty owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd3_OwnUnitInfoProperty owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number)City of Syracuse - AssessmentAdd4_OwnCityStateZipProperty owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code)City of Syracuse - AssessmentFRONTFront footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feetCity of Syracuse - AssessmentDEPTHActual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet)City of Syracuse - AssessmentACRESNumber of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560)City of Syracuse - Assessmentyr_builtYear built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.)City of Syracuse - Assessmentn_ResUnitsNumber of residential unitsNA - Calculated fieldIPSVacantIs it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementIPS_ConditionProperty Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best)City of Syracuse - Division of Code EnforcementNREligibleNational Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentLPSSLocally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District")City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentWTR_ACTIVEWater activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active)City of Syracuse - WaterRNIIs property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDPW_QuadGeographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments.City of Syracuse - Department of Public WorksTNT_NAMETNT Sector property is located inCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNHOODCity NeighborhoodSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)NRSAIs property located in Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentDOCE_AreaGeographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement casesCity of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentZONE_DIST_PREVFormer zoning district codeSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)REZONEReZone designation (adopted June 2023)City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business DevelopmentNew_CC_DISTCurrent Common Council District property is located inOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCTID_2020Census Tract ID (2020)U.S. Census BureauCTLAB_2020Census Tract Label (2020)U.S. Census BureauCT_2020Census Tract (2020)U.S. Census BureauSpecNhoodIs property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)InPDIs property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No)Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)PDNAMEPreservation District nameSyracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)ELECT_DISTElection district numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCITY_WARDCity ward numberOnondaga County Board of ElectionsCOUNTY_LEGOnondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_ASSEMBNew York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsNYS_SENATENew York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022)Onondaga County Board of ElectionsUS_CONGRUnited States Congressional District numberOnondaga County Board of Elections

Approximate boundaries for all land parcels in New Brunswick. The boundaries are structured as Polygons. The Property Identifier number or PID is included for each parcel.

map of all SF properties with associated, zoning, permits, complaints and appeals history See the Data Downloads section of the websites help page for links to individual DataSF datasets used to create the Property Information Map https://sfplanninggis.org/pim/help.html

This dataset is designed to represent and identify the property boundaries in Lexington-Fayette County. The original dataset was created in late 1990's by a third party that converted existing paper maps to digital GIS files. The data has since been updated by georeferencing recorded plats for corrections and new additions. In cases where the plats do not appear accurate, aerial photos are utilized in attempt to properly locate the property lines. The only except for this process are changes to highway right-of-way in which calls are run from deeds. The geometry of this data is not of survey quality and should not be used for survey purposes. The data is intended for general reference purposes only.As part of the basemap data layers, the parcel boundary map layer is an integral part of the Lexington Fayette-Urban County Government Geographic Information System. Basemap data layers are accessed by personnel in most LFUCG divisions for basic applications such as viewing, querying, and map output production. More advanced user applications may focus on thematic mapping, summarization of data by geography, or planning purposes (including defining boundaries, managing assets and facilities, integrating attribute databases with geographic features, spatial analysis, and presentation output).

We are also including a tabular version that’s slightly more comprehensive (would include anything that didn’t join to the parcel basefile due to lot alterations or resubdivisions since 2023 and/or due to parcels comprised of condos). This Excel file can be downloaded HERE, and does not contain the latitude and longitude information.Data Dictionary: Attribute Label Definition Source

TAX_ID Unique 26 character property tax identification number Onondaga County Planning

PRINTKEY Abbreviated tax identification number (section-block-lot) Onondaga County Planning

ADDRESSNUM Property’s physical street address Onondaga County Planning

ADDRESSNAM Property’s physical street name Onondaga County Planning

LAT Latitude Onondaga County Planning

LONG Longitude Onondaga County Planning

TAX_ID_1 City Tax ID number (26 digit number used for parcel mapping) City of Syracuse - Assessment

SBL Property Tax Map Number (Section, Block, Lot) City of Syracuse - Assessment

PNUMBR Property Number (10 digit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

StNum Parcel street number City of Syracuse - Assessment

StName Parcel street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

FullAddress Street number and street name City of Syracuse - Assessment

Zip Parcel zip code City of Syracuse - Assessment

desc_1 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

desc_2 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

desc_3 Lot description including dimensions City of Syracuse - Assessment

SHAPE_IND

City of Syracuse - Assessment

LUC_parcel New York State property type classification code assigned by assessor during each roll categorizing the property by use. For more details: https://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm City of Syracuse - Assessment

LU_parcel New York State property type classification name City of Syracuse - Assessment

LUCat_Old Legacy land use category that corresponds to the overarching NYS category, i.e. all 400s = commercial, all 300s = vacant land, etc. NA

land_av Land assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

total_av Full assessed value City of Syracuse - Assessment

Owner Property owner name (First, Initial, Last, Suffix) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add1_OwnPOBox Property owner mailing address (PO Box) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add2_OwnStAdd Property owner mailing address (street number, street name, street direction) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add3_OwnUnitInfo Property owner mailing address unit info (unit name, unit number) City of Syracuse - Assessment

Add4_OwnCityStateZip Property owner mailing address (city, state or country, zip code) City of Syracuse - Assessment

FRONT Front footage for square or rectangular shaped lots and the effective front feet on irregularly shaped lots in feet City of Syracuse - Assessment

DEPTH Actual depth of rectangular shaped lots in feet (irregular lots are usually measured in acres or square feet) City of Syracuse - Assessment

ACRES Number of acres (where values were 0, acreage calculated as FRONT*DEPTH)/43560) City of Syracuse - Assessment

yr_built Year built. Where year built was "0" or null, effective year built is given. (Effective age is determined by comparing the physical condition of one building with that of other like-use, newer buildings. Effective age may or may not represent the actual year built; if there have been constant upgrades or excellent maintenance this may be more recent than the original year built.) City of Syracuse - Assessment

n_ResUnits Number of residential units NA - Calculated field

IPSVacant Is it a vacant structure? ("Commercial" or "Residential" = Yes; null = No) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

IPS_Condition Property Condition Score assigned to vacant properties by housing inspectors during routine vacant inspections (1 = Worst; 5 = Best) City of Syracuse - Division of Code Enforcement

NREligible National Register of Historic Places Eligible ("NR Eligible (SHPO)," or "NR Listed") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

LPSS Locally Protected Site Status ("Eligible/Architecturally Significant" or "Local Protected Site or Local District") City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

WTR_ACTIVE Water activity code ("I" = Inactive; "A" = Active) City of Syracuse - Water

RNI Is property located in Resurgent Neighborhood Initiative (RNI) Area? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

DPW_Quad Geographic quadrant property is located in. Quadrants are divided Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, and Southeast based on property location in relation to I-81 and I-690. DPW uses the quad designation for some types of staff assignments. City of Syracuse - Department of Public Works

TNT_NAME TNT Sector property is located in City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

NHOOD City Neighborhood Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

NRSA Is property located in Neighborhood Revitilization Strategy Area (NRSA)? (1 = Yes; 0 = No) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

DOCE_Area Geographic boundary use to assign Division of Code Enforcement cases City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

ZONE_DIST_PREV Former zoning district code Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

REZONE ReZone designation (adopted June 2023) City of Syracuse - Neighborhood and Business Development

New_CC_DIST Current Common Council District property is located in Onondaga County Board of Elections

CTID_2020 Census Tract ID (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

CTLAB_2020 Census Tract Label (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

CT_2020 Census Tract (2020) U.S. Census Bureau

SpecNhood Is property located in a special Neighborhood historic preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

InPD Is property located in preservation district? (1 = Yes; 0 or null = No) Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

PDNAME Preservation District name Syracuse-Onondaga County Planning Agency (SOCPA)

ELECT_DIST Election district number Onondaga County Board of Elections

CITY_WARD City ward number Onondaga County Board of Elections

COUNTY_LEG Onondaga County Legislative District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

NYS_ASSEMB New York State Assembly District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

NYS_SENATE New York State Senate District number (as of Dec 2022) Onondaga County Board of Elections

US_CONGR United States Congressional District number Onondaga County Board of Elections

Dataset Contact InformationOrganization: Neighborhood & Business DevelopmentPosition:Data Program ManagerCity:Syracuse, NYE-Mail Address:opendata@syrgov.netPlease note there is a data quality issue in this iteration with the preservation district (“InPD,” “PDNAME”) and special neighborhood historic district (“SpecNhood”) fields erroneously showing null results for all parcels.

This layer is derived from the Common Ownership Lots and represents property transactions as they’ve occurred since the implementation of the Vector Property Mapping program in September 2006. A property transaction entails new geometry (split/combination of Lot(s) or property type conversion (from Air Rights, Record, or Tax Lots to Condo lots). The layer contains locations and attributes of archived features (inactive lots – dead lots) and corresponds with Office of Tax and Revenue's Public Extract files (ITSPE). It occurs weekly for the current calendar year and geometry updated when a transaction occurs.

Minnesota's original public land survey plat maps were created between 1848 and 1907 during the first government land survey of the state by the U.S. Surveyor General's Office. This collection of more than 3,600 maps includes later General Land Office (GLO) and Bureau of Land Management maps up through 2001. Scanned images of the maps are available in several digital formats and most have been georeferenced.

The survey plat maps, and the accompanying survey field notes, serve as the fundamental legal records for real estate in Minnesota; all property titles and descriptions stem from them. They also are an essential resource for surveyors and provide a record of the state's physical geography prior to European settlement. Finally, they testify to many years of hard work by the surveying community, often under very challenging conditions.

The deteriorating physical condition of the older maps (drawn on paper, linen, and other similar materials) and the need to provide wider public access to the maps, made handling the original records increasingly impractical. To meet this challenge, the Office of the Secretary of State (SOS), the State Archives of the Minnesota Historical Society (MHS), the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), MnGeo and the Minnesota Association of County Surveyors collaborated in a digitization project which produced high quality (800 dpi), 24-bit color images of the maps in standard TIFF, JPEG and PDF formats - nearly 1.5 terabytes of data. Funding was provided by MnDOT.

In 2010-11, most of the JPEG plat map images were georeferenced. The intent was to locate the plat images to coincide with statewide geographic data without appreciably altering (warping) the image. This increases the value of the images in mapping software where they can be used as a background layer.

These data were compiled to demonstrate new predictive mapping approaches and provide comprehensive gridded 30-meter resolution soil property maps for the Colorado River Basin above Hoover Dam. Random forest models related environmental raster layers representing soil forming factors with field samples to render predictive maps that interpolate between sample locations. Maps represented soil pH, texture fractions (sand, silt clay, fine sand, very fine sand), rock, electrical conductivity (ec), gypsum, CaCO3, sodium adsorption ratio (sar), available water capacity (awc), bulk density (dbovendry), erodibility (kwfact), and organic matter (om) at 7 depths (0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 100, and 200 cm) as well as depth to restrictive layer (resdept) and surface rock size and cover. Accuracy and error estimated using a 10-fold cross validation indicated a range of model performances with coefficient of variation (R2) for models ranging from 0.20 to 0.76 with mean of 0.52 and a standard deviation of 0.12. Models of pH, om and ec had the best accuracy (R2 > 0.6). Most texture fractions, CaCO3, and SAR models had R2 values from 0.5-0.6. Models of kwfact, dbovendry, resdept, rock models, gypsum and awc had R2 values from 0.4-0.5 excepting near surface models which tended to perform better. Very fine sands and 200 cm estimates for other models generally performed poorly (R2 from 0.2-0.4), and sample size for the 200 cm models was too low for reliable model building. More than 90% of the soils data used was sampled since 2000, but some older samples are included. Uncertainty estimates were also developed by creating relative prediction intervals, which allow end users to evaluate uncertainty easily.