This statistic shows the number of registrations of newly diagnosed cases of prostate cancer in England in 2022, by age group. Over **** thousand new cases were reported among men aged 70 to 74 years of age in this year.

Prostate cancer incidence rates in the United States vary significantly across racial and ethnic groups, with Non-Hispanic Black men facing the highest risk. According to recent data, Non-Hispanic Black males have an incidence rate of 194.8 per 100,000 population, which is substantially higher than the overall rate of 120.2 per 100,000. This stark disparity highlights the importance of targeted screening and prevention efforts to address this health inequality. Incidence and mortality trends The burden of prostate cancer in the U.S. has grown in recent years. In 2025, approximately 313,780 men were projected to be diagnosed with prostate cancer, representing a significant increase from previous years. Despite this rising incidence, mortality rates have shown improvement. In 2022, the prostate cancer death rate was 18.7 per 100,000 men, compared to a rate of almost 39 per 100,000 in the year 1990. This decrease reflects advancements in treatment and early detection. Risk factors and survival rates Age remains a critical risk factor for prostate cancer, with men aged 65 to 84 having a 10.6 percent chance of developing the disease. However, there is encouraging news regarding survival rates. From 2014 to 2020, the five-year relative survival rate for prostate cancer patients in the U.S. was an impressive 97 percent. This high survival rate underscores the importance of early detection and the effectiveness of current treatment options.

To investigate the global incidence of prostate cancer with special attention to the changing age structures. Data regarding the cancer incidence and population statistics were retrieved from the International Agency for Research on Cancer in World Health Organization. Eight developing and developed jurisdictions in Asia and the Western countries were selected for global comparison. Time series were constructed based on the cancer incidence rates from 1988 to 2007. The incidence rate of the population aged ≥ 65 was adjusted by the increasing proportion of elderly population, and was defined as the “aging-adjusted incidence rate”. Cancer incidence and population were then projected to 2030. The aging-adjusted incidence rates of prostate cancer in Asia (Hong Kong, Japan and China) and the developing Western countries (Costa Rica and Croatia) had increased progressively with time. In the developed Western countries (the United States, the United Kingdom and Sweden), we observed initial increases in the aging-adjusted incidence rates of prostate cancer, which then gradually plateaued and even decreased with time. Projections showed that the aging-adjusted incidence rates of prostate cancer in Asia and the developing Western countries were expected to increase in much larger extents than the developed Western countries.

This dataset contains Cancer Incidence data for Prostate Cancer(All Stages^) including: Age-Adjusted Rate, Confidence Interval, Average Annual Count, and Trend field information for US States for the average 5 year span from 2018 to 2022.Data are for males segmented age (All Ages, Ages Under 50, Ages 50 & Over, Ages Under 65, and Ages 65 & Over), with field names and aliases describing the sex and age group tabulated.For more information, visit statecancerprofiles.cancer.govData NotationsState Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.TrendRising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0. † Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.‡ Incidence Trend data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.Data Source Field Key(2) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).(7) Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

In 2023, the projected incidence rate of prostate cancer in the Australian population was around *** cases per 100,000 in the ** to ** age group, an incidence rate higher than any other age group. In contrast, the prostate cancer incidence rate was projected to be below *** case per 100,000 amongst the Australian population in age groups less than 39 years.

Legacy unique identifier: P00624

In the period 2018-2019, 2021, it was estimated that U.S. men aged 65 to 84 years and older had a **** percent chance of developing prostate cancer. This statistic shows the probability of males in the United States developing prostate cancer in 2018-2019, 2021, by age.

For 2023, it was estimated that there would be 3,200 new prostate cancer cases among those aged 50 to 59 years in Canada. This statistic displays the estimated number of new prostate cancer cases in Canada among males by age group in 2023.

BackgroundThe United States Preventive Services Task Force supports individualised decision-making for prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening in men aged 55–69. Knowing how the potential benefits and harms of screening vary by an individual’s risk of developing prostate cancer could inform decision-making about screening at both an individual and population level. This modelling study examined the benefit–harm tradeoffs and the cost-effectiveness of a risk-tailored screening programme compared to age-based and no screening.Methods and findingsA life-table model, projecting age-specific prostate cancer incidence and mortality, was developed of a hypothetical cohort of 4.48 million men in England aged 55 to 69 years with follow-up to age 90. Risk thresholds were based on age and polygenic profile. We compared no screening, age-based screening (quadrennial PSA testing from 55 to 69), and risk-tailored screening (men aged 55 to 69 years with a 10-year absolute risk greater than a threshold receive quadrennial PSA testing from the age they reach the risk threshold). The analysis was undertaken from the health service perspective, including direct costs borne by the health system for risk assessment, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. We used probabilistic sensitivity analyses to account for parameter uncertainty and discounted future costs and benefits at 3.5% per year. Our analysis should be considered cautiously in light of limitations related to our model’s cohort-based structure and the uncertainty of input parameters in mathematical models. Compared to no screening over 35 years follow-up, age-based screening prevented the most deaths from prostate cancer (39,272, 95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 16,792–59,685) at the expense of 94,831 (95% UI: 84,827–105,630) overdiagnosed cancers. Age-based screening was the least cost-effective strategy studied. The greatest number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was generated by risk-based screening at a 10-year absolute risk threshold of 4%. At this threshold, risk-based screening led to one-third fewer overdiagnosed cancers (64,384, 95% UI: 57,382–72,050) but averted 6.3% fewer (9,695, 95% UI: 2,853–15,851) deaths from prostate cancer by comparison with age-based screening. Relative to no screening, risk-based screening at a 4% 10-year absolute risk threshold was cost-effective in 48.4% and 57.4% of the simulations at willingness-to-pay thresholds of GBP£20,000 (US$26,000) and £30,000 ($39,386) per QALY, respectively. The cost-effectiveness of risk-tailored screening improved as the threshold rose.ConclusionsBased on the results of this modelling study, offering screening to men at higher risk could potentially reduce overdiagnosis and improve the benefit–harm tradeoff and the cost-effectiveness of a prostate cancer screening program. The optimal threshold will depend on societal judgements of the appropriate balance of benefits–harms and cost-effectiveness.

From 2018 to 2022, around 43 percent of prostate cancer cases in the United States were among men aged 65 to 74 years. During that period, the median age at diagnosis for prostate cancer was 68 years. This statistic shows the distribution of prostate cancer cases in the United States in the period 2018-2022, by age.

Number and percentage of incident cases of prostate cancer and deaths by age group.

Number and rate of new cancer cases diagnosed annually from 1992 to the most recent diagnosis year available. Included are all invasive cancers and in situ bladder cancer with cases defined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Groups for Primary Site based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3). Random rounding of case counts to the nearest multiple of 5 is used to prevent inappropriate disclosure of health-related information.

In 2022, the incidence among the most common cancer types in Germany differed across age groups. Among individuals from the age groups 0 to 44 and 45 to 65 years old, breast cancer had the highest incidence, at **** and **** percent, respectively. Conversely, for those aged 65 and above, prostate cancer had the highest incidence, at **** percent. This statistic depicts the distribution of cancer incidence in Germany in 2022, by cancer type and age group.

IntroductionUp-to-date statistics on prostate cancer incidence and causative risk factors are essential for the primary prevention of this disease. However, the incidence of Prostate cancer (ICD-10 code C61) (PCa), or cancers in general, are poorly documented in Eritrea. This study analyses the data available to produce an estimate of the incidence of PCa in Eritrea.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study by identifying all incident cases of PCa captured between 2011–2018 in the National Health Laboratory pathology database (Polytech 8.37.C); Urology departments of Orotta Referral Hospital and Sembel Hospital. Crude incidence rates (CIRs), age-adjusted rates per 100,000 person years and associated trends were subsequently calculated. Joinpoint Regression Program, V.4.5.0.1 was employed in these analyses.ResultsA total of 1721 cases were reported, of which 1593 (92.5%) were benign prostatic hypertrophy cases and 128 (7.5%) were PCa cases. The mean (±SD) age of the patients with PCa was 73.49 (± 8.9), confidence interval (CI) (54–98) and the minimum and maximum ages were 54 and 98, respectively. The median age interquartile ranges (IQR) was 73 (13) years. The highest and lowest PCa incidence rates were in 2017 (4.51 per 100 000) and 2014 (2.69 per 100 000), respectively. The age standardised rates (ASIR) (World) over the study period (2011–2018) was 30.26 per 100 000. The annualized ASIR values over the study period was 3.78 per 100 000. The associated average annual percentage change (APC) (CI) over the study period was 5.4 (-1.4–12.7), P-value = 0.100, showing a static trend over the study period.ConclusionThis study suggests that previous reports have under-estimated the incidence of PCa in Eritrea. The study provides ample evidence on the need for research targeted at uncovering the true burden of PCa in Eritrea. Potential solutions will require the establishment of high-quality population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) and long-term commitment to improvements in research, training, screening, diagnosis, and the overall management of PCa in the country.

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

Deaths from prostate cancer - Directly age-Standardised Rates (DSR) per 100,000 population Source: Office for National Statistics (ONS) Publisher: Information Centre (IC) - Clinical and Health Outcomes Knowledge Base Geographies: Local Authority District (LAD), Government Office Region (GOR), National, Primary Care Trust (PCT), Strategic Health Authority (SHA) Geographic coverage: England Time coverage: 2005-07, 2007 Type of data: Administrative data

From 2019 to 2023, around 34 percent of prostate cancer deaths in the United States were among men aged 75 to 84 years. During that period, the median age of death for prostate cancer was 79 years. This statistic shows the distribution of prostate cancer deaths in the United States between 2019 and 2023, by age.

Outcomes of age-based and precision screening compared with no screening.

Number and rate of new cancer cases by stage at diagnosis from 2011 to the most recent diagnosis year available. Included are colorectal, lung, breast, cervical and prostate cancer with cases defined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Groups for Primary Site based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3). Random rounding of case counts to the nearest multiple of 5 is used to prevent inappropriate disclosure of health-related information.

INTRODUCTION: Recently there have been several studies suggesting that estrogen exposure may increase the risk of prostate cancer (PCa). In this report we examine associations between PCa incidence and mortality and population-based use of oral contraceptives (OC's). We hypothesized that OC's by-products may cause an environmental contamination leading to an increased low level estrogen exposure and therefore higher PCa incidence and mortality. METHODS: The hypothesis was studied in an ecologic study. We used data from the “international agency for research on cancer” (IACR) to retrieve age-standardized rates of prostate cancer in 2007 and the “United Nations 2007 use of contraceptive report” to retrieve data on contraceptive use. We subsequently used a Pearson correlation and a multivariable linear regression to associate the percentage of women using OC's, intrauterine devices, condoms or vaginal barriers to the age standardized prostate cancer incidence and mortality. We performed these analyses by individual nation and by continent worldwide. RESULTS: OC's use was significantly associated with prostate cancer incidence and mortality in the individual nation world wide (r=0.61 and r=0.53, respectively p<0.05 for all). PCa incidence was also associated with OC's use in Europe (r=0.545 p<0.05) and by continent (r=0.522 p<0.05). All other forms of contraceptives (i.e. intra-uterine devices, condoms or vaginal barriers) were not correlated with prostate cancer incidence or mortality. On multivariable analysis the correlation with OC was independent of nation’s wealth. CONCLUSION: In this hypothesis generating ecologic study we have demonstrated a significant association between OC's and PCa. We hypothesize that oral contraceptive effect may be mediated through environmental estrogen levels; this novel concept is worth further investigation.