The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) has published the Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF) quarterly data update for March 2023.

The data is presented in an interactive tool that allows users to view it in a user-friendly format. The data tool also provides links to further supporting information, to aid understanding of public health in a local population.

The March release is in addition to the quarterly schedule for the PHOF (May, August, November and February) to incorporate new population estimates from the 2021 Census.

This update includes new data for 20 indicators.

• 1 indicator from the overarching domain, life expectancy at birth and at 65
• 7 indicators from the health improvement domain including hospital admissions related to children and older people, baby’s first feed breastmilk and percentage reporting a long term musculoskeletal (MSK) problem
• 12 indicators from the healthcare and premature mortality indicators including under 75 mortality from various causes and hip fractures

The trend data have been removed for 17 of these indicators as revised mid-year population estimates for 2012 to 2020, based on the 2021 Census, are not yet available.

See the indicator updates document on this page for full details of what’s in this update.

View previous Public Health Outcomes Framework data tool updates.

This Public Health Portfolio (Directly Funded Research - Programme and Training Awards) dataset contains NIHR directly funded research awards where the funding is allocated to an award holder or host organisation to carry out a specific piece of research or complete a training award. The NIHR also invests significantly in centres of excellence, collaborations, services and facilities to support research in England. Collectively these form NIHR infrastructure support. NIHR infrastructure supported projects are available in the Public Health Portfolio (Infrastructure Support) dataset which you can find here.NIHR directly funded research awards (Programmes and Training Awards) that were funded between January 2006 and the present extraction date are eligible for inclusion in this dataset. An agreed inclusion/exclusion criteria is used to categorise awards as public health awards (see below). Following inclusion in the dataset, public health awards are second level coded to one of the four Public Health Outcomes Framework domains. These domains are: (1) wider determinants (2) health improvement (3) health protection (4) healthcare and premature mortality.More information on the Public Health Outcomes Framework domains can be found here.This dataset is updated quarterly to include new NIHR awards categorised as public health awards. Please note that for those Public Health Research Programme projects showing an Award Budget of £0.00, the project is undertaken by an on-call team for example, PHIRST, Public Health Review Team, or Knowledge Mobilisation Team, as part of an ongoing programme of work.Inclusion CriteriaThe NIHR Public Health Overview project team worked with colleagues across NIHR public health research to define the inclusion criteria for NIHR public health research. NIHR directly funded research awards are categorised as public health if they are determined to be ‘investigations of interventions in, or studies of, populations that are anticipated to have an effect on health or on health inequity at a population level.’ This definition of public health is intentionally broad to capture the wide range of NIHR public health research across prevention, health improvement, health protection, and healthcare services (both within and outside of NHS settings). This dataset does not reflect the NIHR’s total investment in public health research. The intention is to showcase a subset of the wider NIHR public health portfolio. This dataset includes NIHR directly funded research awards categorised as public health awards. This dataset does not include public health awards or projects funded by any of the three NIHR Research Schools or NIHR Health Protection Research Units.DisclaimersUsers of this dataset should acknowledge the broad definition of public health that has been used to develop the inclusion criteria for this dataset. Please note that this dataset is currently subject to a limited data quality review. We are working to improve our data collection methodologies. Please also note that some awards may also appear in other NIHR curated datasets. Further InformationFurther information on the individual awards shown in the dataset can be found on the NIHR’s Funding & Awards website here. Further information on individual NIHR Research Programme’s decision making processes for funding health and social care research can be found here.Further information on NIHR’s investment in public health research can be found as follows:The NIHR is one of the main funders of public health research in the UK. Public health research falls within the remit of a range of NIHR Directly Funded Research (Programmes and Training Awards), and NIHR Infrastructure Support. NIHR School for Public Health here.NIHR Public Health Policy Research Unit here. NIHR Health Protection Research Units here.NIHR Public Health Research Programme Health Determinants Research Collaborations (HDRC) here.NIHR Public Health Research Programme Public Health Intervention Responsive Studies Teams (PHIRST) here.

Public Health Indicators in Chicago

Natality, Mortality, Infectious Disease, Lead Poisoning and Economic Status

By City of Chicago [source]

About this dataset

This public health dataset contains a comprehensive selection of indicators related to natality, mortality, infectious disease, lead poisoning, and economic status from Chicago community areas. It is an invaluable resource for those interested in understanding the current state of public health within each area in order to identify any deficiencies or areas of improvement needed.

The data includes 27 indicators such as birth and death rates, prenatal care beginning in first trimester percentages, preterm birth rates, breast cancer incidences per hundred thousand female population, all-sites cancer rates per hundred thousand population and more. For each indicator provided it details the geographical region so that analyses can be made regarding trends on a local level. Furthermore this dataset allows various stakeholders to measure performance along these indicators or even compare different community areas side-by-side.

This dataset provides a valuable tool for those striving toward better public health outcomes for the citizens of Chicago's communities by allowing greater insight into trends specific to geographic regions that could potentially lead to further research and implementation practices based on empirical evidence gathered from this comprehensive yet digestible selection of indicators

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

In order to use this dataset effectively to assess the public health of a given area or areas in the city: - Understand which data is available: The list of data included in this dataset can be found above. It is important to know all that are included as well as their definitions so that accurate conclusions can be made when utilizing the data for research or analysis. - Identify areas of interest: Once you are familiar with what type of data is present it can help to identify which community areas you would like to study more closely or compare with one another. - Choose your variables: Once you have identified your areas it will be helpful to decide which variables are most relevant for your studies and research specific questions regarding these variables based on what you are trying to learn from this data set.
- Analyze the Data : Once your variables have been selected and clarified take right into analyzing the corresponding values across different community areas using statistical tests such as t-tests or correlations etc.. This will help answer questions like “Are there significant differences between two outputs?” allowing you to compare how different Chicago Community Areas stack up against each other with regards to public health statistics tracked by this dataset!

Research Ideas

• Creating interactive maps that show data on public health indicators by Chicago community area to allow users to explore the data more easily.
• Designing a machine learning model to predict future variations in public health indicators by Chicago community area such as birth rate, preterm births, and childhood lead poisoning levels.
• Developing an app that enables users to search for public health information in their own community areas and compare with other areas within the city or across different cities in the US

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

See the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: public-health-statistics-selected-public-health-indicators-by-chicago-community-area-1.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Community Area | Unique identifier for each community area in Chicago. (Integer) | | Community Area Name | Name of the community area in Chicago. (String) | | Birth Rate | Number of live births per 1,000 population. (Float) | | General Fertility Rate | Number of live births per 1,000 women aged 15-44. (Float) ...

Public Health England (PHE) has published the Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF) quarterly data update for August 2021.

The data is presented in an interactive tool that allows users to view it in a user-friendly format. The data tool also provides links to further supporting information, to aid understanding of public health in a local population.

This update contains:

• the addition of one new indicator
• one indicator updated with new methodology
• more recent data for 4 indicators

See links to indicators updated document for full details of what’s in this update.

View previous Public Health Outcomes Framework data tool updates.

Compendium of public health outcomes indicators presented at England and upper tier LA level. Indicators are split over 4 domains: improving the wider determinants of health; health improvement; health protection; healthcare, public health and preventing premature mortality. Produced by Public Health England.

Source agency: Health

Designation: Official Statistics not designated as National Statistics

Language: English

Alternative title: PHOF

U.S. Mortality and Health Indicators

Impact of Risk Factors on Population Health Outcomes

By Data Society [source]

About this dataset

This dataset provides county-level mortality and health indicators that are useful for measuring the impact of health policies in the United States. It includes data elements and values from over a dozen categories, including Demographics, Leading Causes of Death, Summary Measures of Health, Measures of Birth and Death, Relative Health Importance, Vulnerable Populations and Environmental Health, Preventive Services Use, Risk Factors and Access to Care. Additionally, this dataset offers Healthy People 2010 Targets and US Percentages or Rates for easy comparison across states. With comprehensive information for each county in each indicator domain available here at your fingertips could help you get insight into American population health from the local level like never before. Discover trends on disease outbreaks or immunizations that are unprecedentedly localized with insights from this dataset!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains various data elements related to the mortality and health of the US population at various levels such as county, state, etc. This dataset is an ideal source of information for researchers and policy makers who are interested in exploring patterns in the mortality and health of US citizens.

In order to use this dataset effectively, it is important to understand the different indicators included as well as how to interpret these indicators. In this guide we will look at each indicator domain separately so that users can easily identify which relevant data elements they need for their analysis.

Demographics: The Demographics indicator domain includes data elements related to demographic characteristics such as age composition, gender composition etc. These indicators can be used to explore trends across different parts of the country or identify disparities among populations.

Leading Causes of Death: The Leading Causes of Death indicator domain contains information on fatalities by cause over a set period of time -- either two years or five years depending on availability -- so that researchers can identify causes that pose major threats to public health overall or in more specific regions such as certain counties. It is important to note that these largely report figures based on death certificates which may not always tell an exact story due to reporting inaccuracies caused by both individual factors and registration biases across counties/states over time.

 **Summary Measures Of Health**: The Summary Measures Of Health Indicator Domain includes measures commonly used for gauging overall population health such as birth rates and death rates but also key quality-of-life considerations like prevalence rate physical activity rate . These can be used together with other data sources (such as income info) when analyzing population health outcomes from a broader perspective than individual diseases or conditions would allow for . 

 **Measures Of Birth And Death**: This category provides further insight into the important summary level figures mentioned earlier by providing observations about frequency , timing , type etc where available . Additionally , it offers valuable insights about trends related specifically (among others ) out - migration /in - migration mortality ratio changes/births outside hospitals marriage age / labor force participation trends etc – all essential ingredients when trying solve complex issues related improving public one's life expectancy positively  

 **Relative Health Importance & Vulnerable Populations And Environment Capacity :** This section covers two closely intertwined fields revealing how they interact – socioeconomic status disparities & environment quality – around boundaries & neighborhoods influencing risks factors (not only related medical matters ) aspects such disabilities insurance coverage alcohol use & smoking habits road fatalities veh

Research Ideas

• Using the Health Status Indicators as input features, machine learning models can be built to predict county-level mortality rate, which can then be used as an important indicator for health and medical resource allocation.
• The data can also be used to analyze the social determinants of health in different counties by combining with socioeconomic indicators such as poverty, population density and educational attainment levels.
• Additionally, the dataset could help assess th...

This dataset includes materials for an undergraduate learning activity focused on exploring the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) through applied data analysis and mapping from Coastal Carolina University - Department of Nursing and Health Sciences. The download contains two files:a written assignment with step-by-step instructions, andan Excel file containing county-level health and SDOH data for South Carolina. The data were compiled from three sources (CDC PLACES, US Census Bureau's American Community Survey, Feeding America's Map the Meal Gap)Students use these materials to create maps, correlation matrices, and scatterplots in Microsoft Excel, enabling them to examine relationships between health outcomes and social factors such as poverty, education, and food access.

Demographic Trends and Health Outcomes in the U.S

Inequalities,Risk Factors and Access to Care

By Data Society [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains key demographic, health status indicators and leading cause of death data to help us understand the current trends and health outcomes in communities across the United States. By looking at this data, it can be seen how different states, counties and populations have changed over time. With this data we can analyze levels of national health services use such as vaccination rates or mammography rates; review leading causes of death to create public policy initiatives; as well as identify risk factors for specific conditions that may be associated with certain populations or regions. The information from these files includes State FIPS Code, County FIPS Code, CHSI County Name, CHSI State Name, CHSI State Abbreviation, Influenza B (FluB) report count & expected cases rate per 100K population , Hepatitis A (HepA) Report Count & expected cases rate per 100K population , Hepatitis B (HepB) Report Count & expected cases rate per 100K population , Measles (Meas) Report Count & expected cases rate per 100K population , Pertussis(Pert) Report Count & expected case rate per 100K population , CRS report count & expected case rate per 100K population , Syphilis report count and expected case rate per 100k popuation. We also look at measures related to preventive care services such as Pap smear screen among women aged 18-64 years old check lower/upper confidence intervals seperately ; Mammogram checks among women aged 40-64 years old specified lower/upper conifence intervals separetly ; Colonosopy/ Proctoscpushy among men aged 50+ measured in lower/upper limits ; Pneumonia Vaccination amongst 65+ with loewr/upper confidence level detail Additionally we have some interesting trend indicating variables like measures of birth adn death which includes general fertility ratye ; Teen Birth Rate by Mother's age group etc Summary Measures covers mortality trend following life expectancy by sex&age categories Vressionable populations access info gives us insight into disablilty ratio + access to envtiromental issues due to poor quality housing facilities Finally Risk Factors cover speicfic hoslitic condtiions suchs asthma diagnosis prevelance cancer diabetes alcholic abuse smoking trends All these information give a good understanding on Healthy People 2020 target setings demograpihcally speaking hence will aid is generating more evience backed policies

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

What the Dataset Contains

This dataset contains valuable information about public health relevant to each county in the United States, broken down into 9 indicator domains: Demographics, Leading Causes of Death, Summary Measures of Health, Measures of Birth and Death Rates, Relative Health Importance, Vulnerable Populations and Environmental Health Conditions, Preventive Services Use Data from BRFSS Survey System Data , Risk Factors and Access to Care/Health Insurance Coverage & State Developed Types of Measurements such as CRS with Multiple Categories Identified for Each Type . The data includes indicators such as percentages or rates for influenza (FLU), hepatitis (HepA/B), measles(MEAS) pertussis(PERT), syphilis(Syphilis) , cervical cancer (CI_Min_Pap_Smear - CI_Max\Pap \Smear), breast cancer (CI\Min Mammogram - CI \Max \Mammogram ) proctoscopy (CI Min Proctoscopy - CI Max Proctoscopy ), pneumococcal vaccinations (Ci min Pneumo Vax - Ci max Pneumo Vax )and flu vaccinations (Ci min Flu Vac - Ci Max Flu Vac). Additionally , it provides information on leading causes of death at both county levels & national level including age-adjusted mortality rates due to suicide among teens aged between 15-19 yrs per 100000 population etc.. Furthermore , summary measures such as age adjusted percentage who consider their physical health fair or poor are provided; vulnerable populations related indicators like relative importance score for disabled adults ; preventive service use related ones ranging from self reported vaccination coverage among men40-64 yrs old against hepatitis B virus etc...

Getting Started With The Dataset

To get started with exploring this dataset first your need to understand what each column in the table represents: State FIPS Code identifies a unique identifier used by various US government agencies which denote states . County FIPS code denotes counties wi...

This dataset compiles daily snapshots of publicly reported data on 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) testing in Ontario.

Learn how the Government of Ontario is helping to keep Ontarians safe during the 2019 Novel Coronavirus outbreak.

Data includes:

• reporting date
• reporting Public Health Unit (PHU)
• case outcomes (active, resolutions and deaths)

The last update of this file will occur on Thursday December 1, 2022. For more information about COVID-19 cases and deaths by public health unit, please consult the Public Health Ontario COVID-19 data tool

The methodology used to count COVID-19 deaths has changed to exclude deaths not caused by COVID. This impacts data captured in the columns “RESOLVED_CASES” and “DEATHS” starting with the file posted on March 11, 2022. Two new columns have been added to the file “ARCHIVED_RESOLVED_CASES” and “ARCHIVED_DEATHS” which represent the data that were posted publicly prior to the methodological change.

This dataset is subject to change. Please review the daily epidemiologic summaries for information on variables, methodology, and technical considerations.

County Health Status Profiles is an annually published report for the State of California by the California Department of Public Health in collaboration with the California Conference of Local Health Officers. Health indicators are measured for 58 counties and California statewide that can be directly compared to national standards and populations of similar composition. Where available, the measurements are ranked and compared with target rates established for Healthy People National Objectives.

For tables where the health indicator denominator and numerator are derived from the same data source, the denominator excludes records for which the health indicator data is missing and unable to be imputed.

For more information see the County Health Status Profiles report.

New York State Health Indicators

Examination of County and Region-level Data

By Health Data New York [source]

About this dataset

The New York State Community Health Indicator Reports (CHIRS) provides an incredible resource of data to analyze the health of all communities in this state. This dataset contains more than 300 indicators across 15 health topics, which are organized by region and county. These indicators include important information such as event counts, percent/rates, confidence intervals, measure units,quartiles and many more. Whether you're a researcher or a policymaker interested in public health issues in this state - this dataset can be used to inform your decisions by creating powerful visuals with it's wealth of data points. Use this dataset to explore different factors that could be impacting public health outcomes and discover key insights around public health trends in the Empire State!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains data on more than 300 health indicators for all 62 New York State counties, 11 regions (including New York City), the State excluding New York City, and New York State. It can be used to analyze different trends in population health from a local and state-level perspective. Here is a guide on how to use this dataset:

• Familiarize yourself with the data columns: Have an understanding of what each column represents in order to have a better grasp of what type of analyses you will be able to do with this dataset. Additionally, look into other potential features that may not be included within this dataset but could help you with your research or analysis.
• Clean and prepare the data: Make sure that the data is up-to-date and free of errors by cleaning it up prior to conducting any analysis or research project. Some cleaning steps may include inspecting for accuracy, addressing missing values/outliers, formatting irregularities etc.
• Generate questions related to public health issues: Brainstorm ideas around public health topics or possible implications based on your curiosities then use those questions as stepping stones when conducting further research or analysis into this particular healthcare dataset..
• Visualize key information through visual plots/charts: Create charts and graphs which could significantly give out important insights by providing visualization capabilities that would allow users valuable information in an understandable manner such as indicating correlations between certain factors or determining frequency distributions among others.. 5 Develop conclusions from your exploratory findings : Through careful calculation using thoughtfully designed formulas as well as chart interpretation draw meaningful conclusions from continuous observation assessments performed within the contents of this healthcare related base answer pertinent queries raised at hand efficiently thereby leaving no room for ambiguity in user’s overall comprehension about subject matter discussed herein ensured efficient completion processes executed timely objectives justly desired

Research Ideas

• Comparing health indicators across different New York state counties and regions: This dataset can be used to compare the health indicators of different New York county and region levels, helping identify areas of strength or weakness in an area's public health conditions.
• Examining changes over time: By analyzing data from multiple years, this dataset can be used to understand patterns in changes of public health outcomes throughout NY state regions since 2012.
• Generating targeted public health initiatives and interventions: Understanding the geographical distribution of positive or negative public health outcomes could help generate targeted policy interventions more effectively tailored to local needs than a one-size-fits-all approach

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

See the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: community-health-indicator-reports-chirs-latest-data-1.csv | Column name | Description | |:----------------------------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | County Name | Name of the county in New York State. (String) | | Health Topic Number | Number assigned to each hea...

This dataset comprises public health records, surveillance systems, and environmental monitoring data collected from multiple regions over several years. It contains 43,689 entries that provide a comprehensive view of public health dynamics, essential for understanding disease dissemination and guiding effective control strategies. The data has been meticulously gathered from regional health departments, hospitals, laboratories, and public health organizations, ensuring a high level of quality, consistency, and completeness. Each record has been anonymized and aggregated to protect sensitive information.

This dataset serves as a vital resource for researchers, policymakers, and health professionals aiming to analyze and predict public health trends, assess the impact of environmental factors, and improve epidemic response strategies.

Features The dataset includes the following features:

Age: Age of the individual in years. Gender: Gender of the individual (Male, Female, Other). Location: Geographic location (Urban, Rural, Suburban). Ethnicity: Ethnicity of the individual. Socioeconomic Status (SES): Socioeconomic status categorized as Low, Medium, or High. Chronic Conditions: Presence of chronic health conditions. Vaccination Status: Whether the individual is vaccinated (Yes, No). Medical History: Previous medical history (None, Past Illness, Chronic). Immunity Level: Estimated level of immunity (Low, Medium, High). Reported Symptoms: Type and severity of symptoms reported. Transmission Rate: Rate of disease transmission within the population. Daily New Cases: Number of new cases reported daily. Healthcare Personnel Availability: Availability of healthcare workers in the region. Hospital Capacity: Number of beds and resources available in healthcare facilities. Environmental Factors: Data related to air quality, temperature, and other environmental variables influencing health outcomes. Hospitalization Requirement: Predicted level of hospitalization needed based on reported symptoms and medical history. This dataset is ideal for various analytical tasks, including predictive modeling, classification, and feature exploration, making it a valuable asset for advancing public health research.

Journal of public health research Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk - The Journal of Public Health Research is an online peer-reviewed and Open Access scholarly journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the 'traditional' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, the Journal of Public Health Research strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, the Journal of Public Health Research publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.

The annual report has also set priorities for the year ahead: Continue to reduce health inequalities Continue with measures to protect the health of the whole population Improve mental health and wellbeing across the whole population Ensure babies, children and young people get the best start in life Continue to work with NHS partners to maximise joint effectiveness and impact on health outcomes Ensure the working age population have opportunities to live well Ensure the older age population can age well Develop a centre for public health excellence to promote research, training and behavioural science.

Average of health outcome indicators by final clubs between 2000 and 2019.

The Health of the City report summarizes data on community health in Philadelphia through interactive charts and maps. The Health of the City table contains aggregate metrics on population statistics, social determinants of health, and health outcomes that were used to build this report.

This data originates from the Public Health Outcomes tool currently presents data for available indicators for upper tier local authority levels, collated by Public Health England (PHE). The data currently published here are the baselines for the Public Health Outcomes Framework, together with more recent data where these are available. The baseline period is 2010 or equivalent, unless these data are unavailable or not deemed to be of sufficient quality. The first data were published in this tool as an official statistics release in November 2012. Future official statistics updates will be published as part of a quarterly update cycle in August, November, February and May. The definition, rationale, source information, and methodology for each indicator can be found within the spreadsheet. Data included in the spreadsheet: 0.1i - Healthy life expectancy at birth0.1ii - Life Expectancy at 650.1ii - Life Expectancy at birth0.2i - Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth based on national deprivation deciles within England0.2ii - Number of upper tier local authorities for which the local slope index of inequality in life expectancy (as defined in 0.2iii) has decreased0.2iii - Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth within English local authorities, based on local deprivation deciles within each area0.2iv - Gap in life expectancy at birth between each local authority and England as a whole0.2v - Slope index of inequality in healthy life expectancy at birth based on national deprivation deciles within England0.2vii - Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth within English regions, based on regional deprivation deciles within each area1.01i - Children in poverty (all dependent children under 20)1.01ii - Children in poverty (under 16s)1.02i - School Readiness: The percentage of children achieving a good level of development at the end of reception1.02i - School Readiness: The percentage of children with free school meal status achieving a good level of development at the end of reception1.02ii - School Readiness: The percentage of Year 1 pupils achieving the expected level in the phonics screening check1.02ii - School Readiness: The percentage of Year 1 pupils with free school meal status achieving the expected level in the phonics screening check1.03 - Pupil absence1.04 - First time entrants to the youth justice system1.05 - 16-18 year olds not in education employment or training1.06i - Adults with a learning disability who live in stable and appropriate accommodation1.06ii - % of adults in contact with secondary mental health services who live in stable and appropriate accommodation1.07 - People in prison who have a mental illness or a significant mental illness1.08i - Gap in the employment rate between those with a long-term health condition and the overall employment rate1.08ii - Gap in the employment rate between those with a learning disability and the overall employment rate1.08iii - Gap in the employment rate for those in contact with secondary mental health services and the overall employment rate1.09i - Sickness absence - The percentage of employees who had at least one day off in the previous week1.09ii - Sickness absence - The percent of working days lost due to sickness absence1.10 - Killed and seriously injured (KSI) casualties on England's roads1.11 - Domestic Abuse1.12i - Violent crime (including sexual violence) - hospital admissions for violence1.12ii - Violent crime (including sexual violence) - violence offences per 1,000 population1.12iii- Violent crime (including sexual violence) - Rate of sexual offences per 1,000 population1.13i - Re-offending levels - percentage of offenders who re-offend1.13ii - Re-offending levels - average number of re-offences per offender1.14i - The rate of complaints about noise1.14ii - The percentage of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 65dB(A) or more, during the daytime1.14iii - The percentage of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-time1.15i - Statutory homelessness - homelessness acceptances1.15ii - Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation1.16 - Utilisation of outdoor space for exercise/health reasons1.17 - Fuel Poverty1.18i - Social Isolation: % of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would like1.18ii - Social Isolation: % of adult carers who have as much social contact as they would like1.19i - Older people's perception of community safety - safe in local area during the day1.19ii - Older people's perception of community safety - safe in local area after dark1.19iii - Older people's perception of community safety - safe in own home at night2.01 - Low birth weight of term babies2.02i - Breastfeeding - Breastfeeding initiation2.02ii - Breastfeeding - Breastfeeding prevalence at 6-8 weeks after birth2.03 - Smoking status at time of delivery2.04 - Under 18 conceptions2.04 - Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 162.06i - Excess weight in 4-5 and 10-11 year olds - 4-5 year olds2.06ii - Excess weight in 4-5 and 10-11 year olds - 10-11 year olds2.07i - Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years)2.07i - Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-4 years)2.07ii - Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24)2.08 - Emotional well-being of looked after children2.09i - Smoking prevalence at age 15 - current smokers (WAY survey)2.09ii - Smoking prevalence at age 15 - regular smokers (WAY survey)2.09iii - Smoking prevalence at age 15 - occasional smokers (WAY survey)2.09iv - Smoking prevalence at age 15 years - regular smokers (SDD survey)2.09v - Smoking prevalence at age 15 years - occasional smokers (SDD survey)2.12 - Excess Weight in Adults2.13i - Percentage of physically active and inactive adults - active adults2.13ii - Percentage of physically active and inactive adults - inactive adults2.14 - Smoking Prevalence2.14 - Smoking prevalence - routine & manual2.15i - Successful completion of drug treatment - opiate users2.15ii - Successful completion of drug treatment - non-opiate users2.16 - People entering prison with substance dependence issues who are previously not known to community treatment2.17 - Recorded diabetes2.18 - Admission episodes for alcohol-related conditions - narrow definition2.19 - Cancer diagnosed at early stage (Experimental Statistics)2.20i - Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer2.20ii - Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer2.21i - Antenatal infectious disease screening – HIV coverage2.21iii - Antenatal Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Screening - coverage2.21iv - Newborn bloodspot screening - coverage2.21v - Newborn Hearing screening - Coverage2.21vii - Access to non-cancer screening programmes - diabetic retinopathy2.21viii - Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening2.22iii - Cumulative % of the eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check2.22iv - Cumulative % of the eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check2.22v - Cumulative % of the eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health check2.23i - Self-reported well-being - people with a low satisfaction score2.23ii - Self-reported well-being - people with a low worthwhile score2.23iii - Self-reported well-being - people with a low happiness score2.23iv - Self-reported well-being - people with a high anxiety score2.23v - Average Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) score2.24i - Injuries due to falls in people aged 65 and over2.24ii - Injuries due to falls in people aged 65 and over - aged 65-792.24iii - Injuries due to falls in people aged 65 and over - aged 80+3.01 - Fraction of mortality attributable to particulate air pollution3.02 - Chlamydia detection rate (15-24 year olds)3.02 - Chlamydia detection rate (15-24 year olds)3.03i - Population vaccination coverage - Hepatitis B (1 year old)3.03i - Population vaccination coverage - Hepatitis B (2 years old)3.03iii - Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (1 year old)3.03iii - Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 years old)3.03iv - Population vaccination coverage - MenC3.03ix - Population vaccination coverage - MMR for one dose (5 years old)3.03v - Population vaccination coverage - PCV3.03vi - Population vaccination coverage - Hib / Men C booster (5 years)3.03vi - Population vaccination coverage - Hib / MenC booster (2 years old)3.03vii - Population vaccination coverage - PCV booster3.03viii - Population vaccination coverage - MMR for one dose (2 years old)3.03x - Population vaccination coverage - MMR for two doses (5 years old)3.03xii - Population vaccination coverage - HPV3.03xiii - Population vaccination coverage - PPV3.03xiv - Population vaccination coverage - Flu (aged 65+)3.03xv - Population vaccination coverage - Flu (at risk individuals)3.04 - People presenting with HIV at a late stage of infection3.05i - Treatment completion for TB3.05ii - Incidence of TB3.06 - NHS organisations with a board approved sustainable development management plan3.07 - Comprehensive, agreed inter-agency plans for responding to health protection incidents and emergencies4.01 - Infant mortality4.02 - Tooth decay in children aged 54.03 - Mortality rate from causes considered preventable4.04i - Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases4.04ii - Under 75 mortality rate from cardiovascular diseases considered preventable4.05i - Under 75 mortality rate from cancer4.05ii - Under 75 mortality rate from cancer considered preventable4.06i - Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease4.06ii - Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease considered preventable4.07i - Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease4.07ii - Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease considered preventable4.08 - Mortality

This dataset contains model-based census tract estimates. PLACES covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia—at county, place, census tract, and ZIP Code Tabulation Area levels. It provides information uniformly on this large scale for local areas at four geographic levels. Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in conjunction with the CDC Foundation. The dataset includes estimates for 36 measures: 13 for health outcomes, 9 for preventive services use, 4 for chronic disease-related health risk behaviors, 7 for disabilities, and 3 for health status. These estimates can be used to identify emerging health problems and to help develop and carry out effective, targeted public health prevention activities. Because the small area model cannot detect effects due to local interventions, users are cautioned against using these estimates for program or policy evaluations. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates are Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2021 or 2020 data, Census Bureau 2010 population data, and American Community Survey 2015–2019 estimates. The 2023 release uses 2021 BRFSS data for 29 measures and 2020 BRFSS data for seven measures (all teeth lost, dental visits, mammograms, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, core preventive services among older adults, and sleeping less than 7 hours) that the survey collects data on every other year. More information about the methodology can be found at www.cdc.gov/places.

Journal of public health research Abstract & Indexing - ResearchHelpDesk - The Journal of Public Health Research is an online peer-reviewed and Open Access scholarly journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the 'traditional' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, the Journal of Public Health Research strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, the Journal of Public Health Research publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.

Progress in health outcomes across Africa has been uneven, marked by significant disparities among countries, which not only challenges the global health security but impede progress towards achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 10 (SDG 3 and SDG 10) and Universal Health Coverage (UHC). This paper examines the progress of African countries in reducing intra-country health outcome disparities between 2000 and 2019. In other words, the paper investigates the convergence hypothesis in health outcome using a panel data from 40 African countries. Data were sourced from the World Development Indicators, the World Governance Indicators, and the World Health Organization database. Employing a non-linear dynamic factor model, the study focused on three health outcomes: infant mortality rate, under-5 mortality rate, and life expectancy at birth. The findings indicate that while the hypothesis of convergence is not supported for the selected countries, evidence of convergence clubs is observed for the three health outcome variables. The paper further examine the factors contributing to club formation by using the marginal effects of the ordered logit regression model. The findings indicate that the overall impact of the control variables aligns with existing research. Moreover, governance quality and domestic government health expenditure emerge as significant determinants influencing the probability of membership in specific clubs for the child mortality rate models. In the life expectancy model, governance quality significantly drives club formation. The results suggest that there is a need for common health policies for the different convergence clubs, while country-specific policies should be implemented for the divergent countries. For instance, policies and strategies promoting health prioritization in national budget allocation and reallocation should be encouraged within each final club. Efforts to promote good governance policies by emphasizing anti-corruption measures and government effectiveness should also be encouraged. Moreover, there is a need to implement regional monitoring mechanisms to ensure progress in meeting health commitments, while prioritizing urbanization plans in countries with poorer health outcomes to enhance sanitation access.