Facebook
TwitterThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) EHR Incentive Program provides incentive payments for eligible hospitals to adopt and meaningfully use certified health IT. Among the requirements to receive an incentive payment, participating hospitals must report on public health measures. These measures include the electronic reporting of data regarding: immunizations, emergency department visits (syndromic surveillance), reportable infectious disease laboratory results, and electronic patient data to specialized registries, like cancert. As of 2015, stage 2 of the EHR Incentive Program requires hospitals to report on three public health measures, when applicable, and modified stage 2 of the program requires hospitals to report on two of the three measures. This dataset includes the percentage of hospitals who reported on these measures in program years, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Facebook
TwitterNote: This dataset is historical only and there are not corresponding datasets for more recent time periods. For that more-recent information, please visit the Chicago Health Atlas at https://chicagohealthatlas.org.
This dataset contains a selection of 27 indicators of public health significance by Chicago community area, with the most updated information available. The indicators are rates, percents, or other measures related to natality, mortality, infectious disease, lead poisoning, and economic status. See the full description at https://data.cityofchicago.org/api/assets/2107948F-357D-4ED7-ACC2-2E9266BBFFA2.
Facebook
TwitterPublic Health Reports Acceptance Rate - ResearchHelpDesk - Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research, reviews, and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, public health law, and teaching at schools and programs of public health. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal's contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format. Abstract & indexing Clarivate Analytics: Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Clarivate Analytics: Science Citation Index (SCI) Clarivate Analytics: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) Clarivate Analytics: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) CABI: Global Health Clarivate Analytics: Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences EBSCO EMBASE/Excerpta Medica Ovid JSTOR PubMed Central (PMC) PAIS International - ProQuest ProQuest Statistical Reference Index PubMed: MEDLINE Scopus
Facebook
TwitterBy City of Chicago [source]
This public health dataset contains a comprehensive selection of indicators related to natality, mortality, infectious disease, lead poisoning, and economic status from Chicago community areas. It is an invaluable resource for those interested in understanding the current state of public health within each area in order to identify any deficiencies or areas of improvement needed.
The data includes 27 indicators such as birth and death rates, prenatal care beginning in first trimester percentages, preterm birth rates, breast cancer incidences per hundred thousand female population, all-sites cancer rates per hundred thousand population and more. For each indicator provided it details the geographical region so that analyses can be made regarding trends on a local level. Furthermore this dataset allows various stakeholders to measure performance along these indicators or even compare different community areas side-by-side.
This dataset provides a valuable tool for those striving toward better public health outcomes for the citizens of Chicago's communities by allowing greater insight into trends specific to geographic regions that could potentially lead to further research and implementation practices based on empirical evidence gathered from this comprehensive yet digestible selection of indicators
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
In order to use this dataset effectively to assess the public health of a given area or areas in the city: - Understand which data is available: The list of data included in this dataset can be found above. It is important to know all that are included as well as their definitions so that accurate conclusions can be made when utilizing the data for research or analysis. - Identify areas of interest: Once you are familiar with what type of data is present it can help to identify which community areas you would like to study more closely or compare with one another. - Choose your variables: Once you have identified your areas it will be helpful to decide which variables are most relevant for your studies and research specific questions regarding these variables based on what you are trying to learn from this data set.
- Analyze the Data : Once your variables have been selected and clarified take right into analyzing the corresponding values across different community areas using statistical tests such as t-tests or correlations etc.. This will help answer questions like “Are there significant differences between two outputs?” allowing you to compare how different Chicago Community Areas stack up against each other with regards to public health statistics tracked by this dataset!
- Creating interactive maps that show data on public health indicators by Chicago community area to allow users to explore the data more easily.
- Designing a machine learning model to predict future variations in public health indicators by Chicago community area such as birth rate, preterm births, and childhood lead poisoning levels.
- Developing an app that enables users to search for public health information in their own community areas and compare with other areas within the city or across different cities in the US
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
See the dataset description for more information.
File: public-health-statistics-selected-public-health-indicators-by-chicago-community-area-1.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Community Area | Unique identifier for each community area in Chicago. (Integer) | | Community Area Name | Name of the community area in Chicago. (String) | | Birth Rate | Number of live births per 1,000 population. (Float) | | General Fertility Rate | Number of live births per 1,000 women aged 15-44. (Float) ...
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The annual report has also set priorities for the year ahead: Continue to reduce health inequalities Continue with measures to protect the health of the whole population Improve mental health and wellbeing across the whole population Ensure babies, children and young people get the best start in life Continue to work with NHS partners to maximise joint effectiveness and impact on health outcomes Ensure the working age population have opportunities to live well Ensure the older age population can age well Develop a centre for public health excellence to promote research, training and behavioural science.
Facebook
TwitterThe Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID) has published the Public Health Outcomes Framework (PHOF) quarterly data update for March 2023.
The data is presented in an interactive tool that allows users to view it in a user-friendly format. The data tool also provides links to further supporting information, to aid understanding of public health in a local population.
The March release is in addition to the quarterly schedule for the PHOF (May, August, November and February) to incorporate new population estimates from the 2021 Census.
This update includes new data for 20 indicators.
The trend data have been removed for 17 of these indicators as revised mid-year population estimates for 2012 to 2020, based on the 2021 Census, are not yet available.
See the indicator updates document on this page for full details of what’s in this update.
View previous Public Health Outcomes Framework data tool updates.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.imrmarketreports.com/privacy-policy/https://www.imrmarketreports.com/privacy-policy/
Global Public Health Service Information Collection System Market Report 2023 comes with the extensive industry analysis of development components, patterns, flows and sizes. The report also calculates present and past market values to forecast potential market management through the forecast period between 2023-2029. The report may be the best of what is a geographic area which expands the competitive landscape and industry perspective of the market.
Facebook
TwitterPublic Health Reports Abbreviation ISO4 - ResearchHelpDesk - Public Health Reports is the official journal of the Office of the U.S. Surgeon General and the U.S. Public Health Service and has been published since 1878. It is published bimonthly, plus supplement issues, through an official agreement with the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes original research, reviews, and commentaries in the areas of public health practice and methodology, public health law, and teaching at schools and programs of public health. Issues contain regular commentaries by the U.S. Surgeon General and executives of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health. The journal focuses upon such topics as tobacco control, teenage violence, occupational disease and injury, immunization, drug policy, lead screening, health disparities, and many other key and emerging public health issues. In addition to the six regular issues, PHR produces supplemental issues approximately 2-5 times per year which focus on specific topics that are of particular interest to our readership. The journal's contributors are on the front line of public health and they present their work in a readable and accessible format. Abstract & indexing Clarivate Analytics: Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Clarivate Analytics: Science Citation Index (SCI) Clarivate Analytics: Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) Clarivate Analytics: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) CABI: Global Health Clarivate Analytics: Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences EBSCO EMBASE/Excerpta Medica Ovid JSTOR PubMed Central (PMC) PAIS International - ProQuest ProQuest Statistical Reference Index PubMed: MEDLINE Scopus
Facebook
TwitterCounty Health Status Profiles is an annually published report for the State of California by the California Department of Public Health in collaboration with the California Conference of Local Health Officers. Health indicators are measured for 58 counties and California statewide that can be directly compared to national standards and populations of similar composition. Where available, the measurements are ranked and compared with target rates established for Healthy People National Objectives.
For tables where the health indicator denominator and numerator are derived from the same data source, the denominator excludes records for which the health indicator data is missing and unable to be imputed.
For more information see the County Health Status Profiles report.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.archivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
The Public Health Service Information Collection System (PHICS) market presents promising growth prospects, with a market size estimated at XXXX million in 2025. Driven by the rising demand for efficient and accessible healthcare data collection and management, the market is anticipated to expand at a steady CAGR of XX% during the forecast period of 2025-2033, reaching a projected value of XXXX million by 2033. Key factors contributing to the market's growth include the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, which necessitates comprehensive healthcare data for effective patient management. Furthermore, government initiatives promoting the adoption of electronic health records and interoperability solutions are fueling market demand. The market is segmented into portable mobile and fixed types, as well as community hospital, hospital, and other application areas. Prominent companies in the PHICS market include Shandong Prison Medical Equipment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Medical Cloud Internet Medical Technology Co., Ltd., and SUMSIZ, among others. The market is geographically dispersed across North America, South America, Europe, the Middle East & Africa, and Asia Pacific, with Asia Pacific expected to hold a significant market share due to the region's growing healthcare infrastructure and increasing number of patients suffering from chronic diseases.
Facebook
TwitterThe Health of the City report summarizes data on community health in Philadelphia through interactive charts and maps. The Health of the City table contains aggregate metrics on population statistics, social determinants of health, and health outcomes that were used to build this report.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Unlocking Data to Inform Public Health Policy and Practice: WP1 Mapping Review Supplementary Excel S1
The data extracted into Excel Tab "S1 Case studies (extracted)" represents information from 31 case studies as part of the "Unlocking Data to Inform Public Health Policy and Practice" project, Workpackage (WP) 1 Mapping Review.
Details about the WP1 mapping review can be found in the "Unlocking Data to Inform Public Health Policy and Practice" project report, which can be found via this DOI link: https://doi.org/10.15131/shef.data.21221606
Facebook
Twitterhttps://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licencehttps://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licence
This is not a live document. It has expired. We publish it here as it is retained because it’s a key corporate record.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
After over two years of public reporting, the State Profile Report will no longer be produced and distributed after February 2023. The final release was on February 23, 2023. We want to thank everyone who contributed to the design, production, and review of this report and we hope that it provided insight into the data trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Data about COVID-19 will continue to be updated at CDC’s COVID Data Tracker.
The State Profile Report (SPR) is generated by the Data Strategy and Execution Workgroup in the Joint Coordination Cell, in collaboration with the White House. It is managed by an interagency team with representatives from multiple agencies and offices (including the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, and the Indian Health Service). The SPR provides easily interpretable information on key indicators for each state, down to the county level.
It is a weekly snapshot in time that:
Facebook
TwitterFood Safety and Public Health Statistics (2021-2024)
Facebook
TwitterHealth, United States is the report on the health status of the country. Every year, the report presents an overview of national health trends organized around four subject areas: health status and determinants, utilization of health resources, health care resources, and health care expenditures and payers.
Facebook
TwitterNote: This dataset is historical only and there are not corresponding datasets for more recent time periods. For that more-recent information, please visit the Chicago Health Atlas at https://chicagohealthatlas.org. This dataset contains the annual number and percent of live births by the trimester in which the mother began prenatal care, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, by Chicago community area, for the years 1999 – 2009. See full description at http://bit.ly/KcmIg2
Facebook
TwitterThe following datasets are based on the adult (age 21 and over) beneficiary population and consist of aggregate MHS data derived from Medi-Cal claims, encounter, and eligibility systems. These datasets were developed in accordance with California Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) § 14707.5 (added as part of Assembly Bill 470 on 10/7/17). Please contact BHData@dhcs.ca.gov for any questions or to request previous years’ versions of these datasets. Note: The Performance Dashboard AB 470 Report Application Excel tool development has been discontinued. Please see the Behavioral Health reporting data hub at https://behavioralhealth-data.dhcs.ca.gov/ for access to dashboards utilizing these datasets and other behavioral health data.
Facebook
TwitterUpdate September 20, 2021: Data and overview updated to reflect data used in the September 15 story Over Half of States Have Rolled Back Public Health Powers in Pandemic. It includes 303 state or local public health leaders who resigned, retired or were fired between April 1, 2020 and Sept. 12, 2021. Previous versions of this dataset reflected data used in the Dec. 2020 and April 2021 stories.
Across the U.S., state and local public health officials have found themselves at the center of a political storm as they combat the worst pandemic in a century. Amid a fractured federal response, the usually invisible army of workers charged with preventing the spread of infectious disease has become a public punching bag.
In the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, at least 303 state or local public health leaders in 41 states have resigned, retired or been fired since April 1, 2020, according to an ongoing investigation by The Associated Press and KHN.
According to experts, that is the largest exodus of public health leaders in American history.
Many left due to political blowback or pandemic pressure, as they became the target of groups that have coalesced around a common goal — fighting and even threatening officials over mask orders and well-established public health activities like quarantines and contact tracing. Some left to take higher profile positions, or due to health concerns. Others were fired for poor performance. Dozens retired. An untold number of lower level staffers have also left.
The result is a further erosion of the nation’s already fragile public health infrastructure, which KHN and the AP documented beginning in 2020 in the Underfunded and Under Threat project.
The AP and KHN found that:
To get total numbers of exits by state, broken down by state and local departments, use this query
KHN and AP counted how many state and local public health leaders have left their jobs between April 1, 2020 and Sept. 12, 2021.
The government tasks public health workers with improving the health of the general population, through their work to encourage healthy living and prevent infectious disease. To that end, public health officials do everything from inspecting water and food safety to testing the nation’s babies for metabolic diseases and contact tracing cases of syphilis.
Many parts of the country have a health officer and a health director/administrator by statute. The analysis counted both of those positions if they existed. For state-level departments, the count tracks people in the top and second-highest-ranking job.
The analysis includes exits of top department officials regardless of reason, because no matter the reason, each left a vacancy at the top of a health agency during the pandemic. Reasons for departures include political pressure, health concerns and poor performance. Others left to take higher profile positions or to retire. Some departments had multiple top officials exit over the course of the pandemic; each is included in the analysis.
Reporters compiled the exit list by reaching out to public health associations and experts in every state and interviewing hundreds of public health employees. They also received information from the National Association of City and County Health Officials, and combed news reports and records.
Public health departments can be found at multiple levels of government. Each state has a department that handles these tasks, but most states also have local departments that either operate under local or state control. The population served by each local health department is calculated using the U.S. Census Bureau 2019 Population Estimates based on each department’s jurisdiction.
KHN and the AP have worked since the spring on a series of stories documenting the funding, staffing and problems around public health. A previous data distribution detailed a decade's worth of cuts to state and local spending and staffing on public health. That data can be found here.
Findings and the data should be cited as: "According to a KHN and Associated Press report."
If you know of a public health official in your state or area who has left that position between April 1, 2020 and Sept. 12, 2021 and isn't currently in our dataset, please contact authors Anna Maria Barry-Jester annab@kff.org, Hannah Recht hrecht@kff.org, Michelle Smith mrsmith@ap.org and Lauren Weber laurenw@kff.org.
Facebook
TwitterFinancial overview and grant giving statistics of Montana Public Health Institute
Facebook
TwitterThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) EHR Incentive Program provides incentive payments for eligible hospitals to adopt and meaningfully use certified health IT. Among the requirements to receive an incentive payment, participating hospitals must report on public health measures. These measures include the electronic reporting of data regarding: immunizations, emergency department visits (syndromic surveillance), reportable infectious disease laboratory results, and electronic patient data to specialized registries, like cancert. As of 2015, stage 2 of the EHR Incentive Program requires hospitals to report on three public health measures, when applicable, and modified stage 2 of the program requires hospitals to report on two of the three measures. This dataset includes the percentage of hospitals who reported on these measures in program years, 2013, 2014 and 2015.