CLEAR has public record information and is also used for law enforcement and investigations, including personal identification and financial records, police reports, and credential verification services.

Requests for public data to the State

The OPP began using the Prosecution Records Information Systems Management (PRISM) database in 1996, as a replacement and improvement on the Case Management System (CMS). The system allocated numbers to cases, defendants, appeals, legal advice (on, for example, whether actions witnessed constituted a crime, or whether evidence gathered was sufficient to begin a prosecution), briefings, FOI requests and trials.

PRISM also drew on information from both the Magistrates' Court's CourtLink database and the Criminal Trial Listings database (CLTD). This allowed PRISM users access to an overview of the status of a case, its hearings, victims, offences alleged, appeals, witnesses, sentence, presiding Magistrate, prosecutor, counsel for the defence and other similar information. Its other main function was to produce reports broadly aggregating the activities of the DPP, detailing, for example, the number of cases handled over a time period or which were outstanding, expenditure on appeals, or any other combination of fields filtered by the user.

Officers of the DPP, the Magistrates' Court or even prosecutors might all at some stage have entered data residing in PRISM.

CMS differed from PRISM in that only trials already committed, miscellaneous files, some large advice files and direct presentments were allocated a control number.

The number functioning as the DPP's Primary Key, common to (for example) the several phases of a trial, its co-defendants, witnesses and their contact details etc. was the Magistrate Court Ref[erence]. This number was generated by the Magistrates' Court in CourtLink as an ID controlling all aspects of their management of a case.

The Keywords field was used by the DPP to link any records numbered by the CMS (in the form ZA 1234 or ZB 4321) to records in PRISM.

PRISM was not used by DPP to control routine correspondence, minutes, personnel files, payroll or other administrative records. It was, however, a large and complex database, of which only the most salient elements have been described.

LexisNexis provides access to electronic legal and non-legal research databases to the Agency's attorneys, administrative law judges, law clerks, investigators, and certain non-legal staff (e.g. staff in the Office of Public Affairs). The agency requires access to the following types of electronic databases: Legal databases, Non-legal databases, Public Records databases, and Financial databases.

Global Public Records Management Software Market is segmented by Application (Government_ Legal_ Healthcare_ Corporate_ Education), Type (Cloud-based_ Digital Archiving_ Compliance_ Data Security_ Searchable Databases), and Geography (North America_ LATAM_ West Europe_Central & Eastern Europe_ Northern Europe_ Southern Europe_ East Asia_ Southeast Asia_ South Asia_ Central Asia_ Oceania_ MEA)

In 2023, 0.27 percent of surveyed internet users in Luxembourg used the internet to access public databases and registers, up from 0.23 percent in 2022.

Public arrest records from Effingham County law enforcement agencies including Sheriff's Department, State Police, and municipal departments

Investigator(s): Federal Judicial Center The purpose of this data collection is to provide an official public record of the business of the federal courts. The data originate from 100 court offices throughout the United States. Information was obtained at two points in the life of a case: filing and termination. The termination data contain information on both filing and terminations, while the pending data contain only filing information. For the appellate and civil data, the unit of analysis is a single case. The unit of analysis for the criminal data is a single defendant.Years Produced: Updated bi-annually with annual data.

Location of Public Records offices in Los Angeles CountyThis dataset is maintained through the County of Los Angeles Location Management System. The Location Management System is used by the County of Los Angeles GIS Program to maintain a single, comprehensive geographic database of locations countywide. For more information on the Location Management System, visit http://egis3.lacounty.gov/lms/.

Context:

This database of terrorism prosecutions and sentencing information was created using public records including three lists of prosecutions from the U.S. Department of Justice (from 2010, 2014, and 2015), court files available through the federal judiciary’s case management system, DOJ press releases, and inmate data from the Bureau of Prisons.

Content:

Trevor Aaronson created the first iteration of this database as part of a project funded by the Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California, Berkeley. Mother Jones magazine published that data in 2011, along with accompanying articles, in a package that is still available online. Beginning in 2016, Aaronson and Margot Williams collaborated to update and expand the database, with a new emphasis to include Bureau of Prisons data because so many post-9/11 terrorism defendants had been released. The cases include any prosecutions after September 11, 2001, that the U.S. government labeled as related to international terrorism. The Intercept first published this database on April 20, 2017. For each defendant in the database, U.S. criminal code data related to charges has been categorized according to this legend

Acknowledgements:

This database is licensed under Creative Commons for noncommercial uses with appropriate attribution. If you publish this database, in part or whole, you must credit Trevor Aaronson and Margot Williams.

Inspiration:

• What are the most common charges?
• Are the sentence lengths similar?

AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT DATA DISCLAIMER Please read and understand the following information.

This dataset contains a record of incidents that the Austin Police Department responded to and wrote a report. Please note one incident may have several offenses associated with it, but this dataset only depicts the highest level offense of that incident. Data is from 2003 to present. This dataset is updated weekly. Understanding the following conditions will allow you to get the most out of the data provided. Due to the methodological differences in data collection, different data sources may produce different results. This database is updated weekly, and a similar or same search done on different dates can produce different results. Comparisons should not be made between numbers generated with this database to any other official police reports. Data provided represents only calls for police service where a report was written. Totals in the database may vary considerably from official totals following investigation and final categorization. Therefore, the data should not be used for comparisons with Uniform Crime Report statistics. The Austin Police Department does not assume any liability for any decision made or action taken or not taken by the recipient in reliance upon any information or data provided. Pursuant to section 552.301 (c) of the Government Code, the City of Austin has designated certain addresses to receive requests for public information sent by electronic mail. For requests seeking public records held by the Austin Police Department, please submit by utilizing the following link: https://apd-austintx.govqa.us/WEBAPP/_rs/(S(0auyup1oiorznxkwim1a1vpj))/supporthome.aspx

Records related to the routine, day-to-day administration of public affairs activities, including but not limited to:rn- logistics, planning, and correspondence records for routine conferences and eventsrn- correspondence and records on speakers and speaking engagements, including biographiesrn- case files and databases of public comments (related to public affairs activities only)

WHOSIS, the WHO Statistical Information System, is an interactive database bringing together core health statistics for the 193 WHO Member States. It comprises more than 100 indicators, which can be accessed by way of a quick search, by major categories, or through user-defined tables. The data can be further filtered, tabulated, charted and downloaded. The data are also published annually in the World Health Statistics Report released in May. The WHO Statistical Information System is the guide to health and health-related epidemiological and statistical information available from the World Health Organization. Most WHO technical programs make statistical information available, and they will be linked from here. Sponsors: WHOSIS is supported by the World Health Organization. Note: The WHO Statistical Information System (WHOSIS) has been incorporated into the Global Health Observatory (GHO) to provide you with more data, more tools, more analysis and more reports.

A Comprehensive List of Open Data Portals from Around the World

Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL) v1.0 DISCLAIMER Open Data Commons is not a law firm and does not provide legal services of any kind.

Open Data Commons has no formal relationship with you. Your receipt of this document does not create any kind of agent-client relationship. Please seek the advice of a suitably qualified legal professional licensed to practice in your jurisdiction before using this document.

No warranties and disclaimer of any damages.

This information is provided ‘as is‘, and this site makes no warranties on the information provided. Any damages resulting from its use are disclaimed.

Read the full disclaimer. A plain language summary of the Public Domain Dedication and License is available as well as a plain text version.

Public Domain Dedication and License (PDDL) PREAMBLE The Open Data Commons – Public Domain Dedication and Licence is a document intended to allow you to freely share, modify, and use this work for any purpose and without any restrictions. This licence is intended for use on databases or their contents (“data”), either together or individually.

Many databases are covered by copyright. Some jurisdictions, mainly in Europe, have specific special rights that cover databases called the “sui generis” database right. Both of these sets of rights, as well as other legal rights used to protect databases and data, can create uncertainty or practical difficulty for those wishing to share databases and their underlying data but retain a limited amount of rights under a “some rights reserved” approach to licensing as outlined in the Science Commons Protocol for Implementing Open Access Data. As a result, this waiver and licence tries to the fullest extent possible to eliminate or fully license any rights that cover this database and data. Any Community Norms or similar statements of use of the database or data do not form a part of this document, and do not act as a contract for access or other terms of use for the database or data.

THE POSITION OF THE RECIPIENT OF THE WORK Because this document places the database and its contents in or as close as possible within the public domain, there are no restrictions or requirements placed on the recipient by this document. Recipients may use this work commercially, use technical protection measures, combine this data or database with other databases or data, and share their changes and additions or keep them secret. It is not a requirement that recipients provide further users with a copy of this licence or attribute the original creator of the data or database as a source. The goal is to eliminate restrictions held by the original creator of the data and database on the use of it by others.

THE POSITION OF THE DEDICATOR OF THE WORK Copyright law, as with most other law under the banner of “intellectual property”, is inherently national law. This means that there exists several differences in how copyright and other IP rights can be relinquished, waived or licensed in the many legal jurisdictions of the world. This is despite much harmonisation of minimum levels of protection. The internet and other communication technologies span these many disparate legal jurisdictions and thus pose special difficulties for a document relinquishing and waiving intellectual property rights, including copyright and database rights, for use by the global community. Because of this feature of intellectual property law, this document first relinquishes the rights and waives the relevant rights and claims. It then goes on to license these same rights for jurisdictions or areas of law that may make it difficult to relinquish or waive rights or claims.

The purpose of this document is to enable rightsholders to place their work into the public domain. Unlike licences for free and open source software, free cultural works, or open content licences, rightsholders will not be able to “dual license” their work by releasing the same work under different licences. This is because they have allowed anyone to use the work in whatever way they choose. Rightsholders therefore can’t re-license it under copyright or database rights on different terms because they have nothing left to license. Doing so creates truly accessible data to build rich applications and advance the progress of science and the arts.

This document can cover either or both of the database and its contents (the data). Because databases can have a wide variety of content – not just factual data – rightsholders should use the Open Data Commons – Public Domain Dedication & Licence for an entire database and its contents only if everything can be placed under the terms of this document. Because even factual data can sometimes have intellectual property rights, rightsholders should use this licence to cover b...

Activity data for small molecules are invaluable in chemoinformatics. Various bioactivity databases exist containing detailed information of target proteins and quantitative binding data for small molecules extracted from journals and patents. In the current work, we have merged several public and commercial bioactivity databases into one bioactivity metabase. The molecular presentation, target information, and activity data of the vendor databases were standardized. The main motivation of the work was to create a single relational database which allows fast and simple data retrieval by in-house scientists. Second, we wanted to know the amount of overlap between databases by commercial and public vendors to see whether the former contain data complementing the latter. Third, we quantified the degree of inconsistency between data sources by comparing data points derived from the same scientific article cited by more than one vendor. We found that each data source contains unique data which is due to different scientific articles cited by the vendors. When comparing data derived from the same article we found that inconsistencies between the vendors are common. In conclusion, using databases of different vendors is still useful since the data overlap is not complete. It should be noted that this can be partially explained by the inconsistencies and errors in the source data.

The Public Registry is a collection of non-confidential information on pesticides and the pesticide regulatory system. All publicly available information on currently registered pesticides is available here.

This is metadata documentation for the Region 7 Laboratory Information Management System (R7LIMS) which maintains records for the Regional Laboratory. Any Laboratory analytical work performed is stored in this system which replaces LIMS-Lite, and before that LAST. The EPA and its contractors may use this database. The Office of Policy & Management (PLMG) Division at EPA Region 7 is the primary managing entity; contractors can access this database but it is not accessible to the public.

Iowa Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) electronic research and retrieval database system. This system provides access to full-text documents including: Contracts, Contracts Archive, PERB and Court Decisions, and Neutral Decisions.

Contracts – Contracts published and included in this database are only those forwarded to PERB by the parties. Contracts Archive – Contracts that were forwarded to PERB and have expired, beginning with those that expired in 2008, are included in this database.

PERB and Court Decisions – In this database, the PERB decisions do not include routine or preliminary rulings and orders issued by PERB, but include only substantive final agency decisions and non-final rulings and orders deemed informative. Court decisions are those on judicial review of PERB decisions.

Neutral Decisions – The neutral decisions database includes recent and a number of prior years’ fact-finding and interest arbitration decisions. Additionally, it includes only those grievance arbitration decisions forwarded to PERB for publication by the arbitrator with consent of the parties involved. Click on the Contents tab of the database to view all documents contained in the database.

PERB decisions do not include routine or preliminary rulings and orders issued by PERB, but include only substantive final agency decisions and non-final rulings and orders deemed informative. Court decisions are those on judicial review of PERB decisions.

The second public release of the GRID database.Please note, the csv download only includes IDs, names & locations. See the JSON download for all metadata including types & relationshipsInsitutes added from the following sources:- Grant data from Estonia- Grant data from Slovakia- Grant data from United States- grant data data from the CrossRef database (top ~5000 most frequently occurring names)- institutes in the Index of American Universities (http://www.clas.ufl.edu/au/)Metadata:- Coverage of institutes with types increased from 33% to 76%- Parent / Child and Affiliated relationships now included in database dump- Added all NIHR members- All institutes with a Fundref ID have complete metadata