This survey is part of the Horizon Europe Project "ActEU," which focuses on exploring the dynamics of political attitudes, behaviors, and representation within the multilevel system of the European Union during polarized times. In addition to traditional survey questions, the survey also includes two survey experiments.

The survey was administered through Computer-Assisted Web Interviews (CAWI) via an online access panel. Participants aged between 18 and 75 were selected to reflect the demographic diversity within the studied countries. The survey covers 10 European countries: Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, and Spain. These countries were strategically chosen to represent the geographic and political diversity of Europe, facilitating cross-national comparisons of political attitudes, behaviors, and representation.

Data collection took place between April 15, 2024, and May 29, 2024. A total of 13,000 respondents participated, with 1,300 respondents per country.

The National Public Opinion Reference Survey (NPORS) is an annual survey of U.S. adults conducted by the "https://www.pewresearch.org/" Target="_blank">Pew Research Center. The Pew Research Center uses NPORS to produce benchmark estimates for several topics, including Americans' political and religion affiliations.

"https://www.ipsos.com/en-us" Target="_blank">Ipsos conducted the "https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2024/07/08/how-pew-research-center-uses-its-national-public-opinion-reference-survey-npors/" Target="_blank">NPORS for Pew using address-based sampling and a multimode protocol. The survey was fielded Feb. 1, 2024, to June 10, 2024. Participants were first mailed an invitation to complete an online survey. A paper survey was later mailed to those who did not respond. In total, 2,535 respondents completed the survey online, 2,764 respondents completed the paper survey, and 327 respondents completed the survey over the phone (Total N=5,626). The survey was administered in English and Spanish. The AAPOR Response Rate 1 was 32 percent.

The Chicago Surveys are part of a long-running series of public opinion surveys conducted by The Chicago Council on Global Affairs every two years. This study is the 2012 Chicago Council Survey, designed to investigate the opinions and attitudes of the general public on matters related to foreign policy, and to define the parameters of public opinion within which decision-makers must operate. The 2012 Chicago Council Survey focuses on respondents' opinions of the United States' leadership role in the world and the challenges the country faces domestically and internationally. The survey covers the following international topics: relations with other countries, role in foreign affairs, possible threats to vital interests in the next ten years, foreign policy goals, benefits or drawbacks of globalization, situations that might justify the use of United States troops in other parts of the world, the number and location of United States military bases overseas, respondent feelings toward people of other countries, opinions on the influence of other countries in the world and how much influence those countries should have, United States participation in potential treaties, the United States' role in the United Nations and NATO, which side the United States should take in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, what measures should be taken to deal with Iran's nuclear program, the military effort in Afghanistan, opinions on efforts to combat terrorism, and the rise of China as a global power. Domestic issues include economic prospects for American children when they become adults, funding for government programs, the fairness of the current distribution of income in the United States, climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, and United States dependence on foreign energy sources. Demographic and other background information include age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, left-right political self-placement, political affiliation, employment status, highest level of education, and religious preference. Also included are household size and composition, whether the respondent is head of household, household income, housing type, ownership status of living quarters, household Internet access, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) status, and region and state of residence.

The National Public Opinion Reference Survey (NPORS) is an annual survey of U.S. adults conducted by the "https://www.pewresearch.org/" Target="_blank">Pew Research Center. The Pew Research Center uses NPORS to produce benchmark estimates for several topics, including Americans' political and religion affiliations.

"https://www.ipsos.com/en-us" Target="_blank">Ipsos conducted the "https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/fact-sheet/national-public-opinion-reference-survey-npors/" Target="_blank">National Public Opinion Reference Survey (NPORS) for the "https://www.pewresearch.org/" Target="_blank">Pew Research Center using address-based sampling and a multimode protocol. The survey was fielded May 23, 2022, to Sep. 6, 2022. Participants were first mailed an invitation to complete an online survey. A paper survey was later mailed to those who did not respond. In total, 1,982 respondents completed the survey online, and 2,061 respondents completed the paper survey (Total N=4,043). The survey was administered in English and Spanish. The AAPOR Response Rate 1 was 29 percent.

We described public views toward harm reduction among Canadian adults and tested a social exposure model predicting support for these contentious services, drawing on theories in the morality policy, intergroup relations, addiction, and media communication literatures. A quota sample of 4645 adults (18+ years), randomly drawn from an online research panel and stratified to match age and sex distributions of adults within and across Canadian provinces, was recruited in June 2018. Participants completed survey items assessing support for harm reduction for people who use drugs (PWUD) and for seven harm reduction interventions. Additional items assessed exposure to media coverage on harm reduction, and scales assessing stigma toward PWUD (α = .72), personal familiarity with PWUD (α = .84), and disease model beliefs about addiction (α = 0.79). Most (64%) Canadians supported harm reduction (provincial estimates = 60% - 73%). Five of seven interventions received majority support, including: outreach (79%), naloxone (72%), drug checking (70%), needle distribution (60%) and supervised drug consumption (55%). Low-threshold opioid agonist treatment and safe inhalation interventions received less support (49% and 44%). Our social exposure model, adjusted for respondent sex, household income, political views, and education, exhibited good fit and accounted for 17% of variance in public support for harm reduction. Personal familiarity with PWUD and disease model beliefs about addiction were directly associated with support (βs = .07 and -0.10, respectively), and indirectly influenced public support via stigmatized attitudes toward PWUD (βs = 0.01 and -0.01, respectively). Strategies to increase support for harm reduction could problematize certain disease model beliefs (e.g., “There are only two possibilities for an alcoholic or drug addict – permanent abstinence or death”) and creating opportunities to reduce social distance between PWUD, the public, and policy makers.

This data collection consists of public opinion surveys of the adult German population in November, 1968. Respondents were asked about their economic situation, the likelihood of inflation, the problems facing their communities and administrative responses to those problems, and their opinions of the chancellor, president, and the German political parties. See also the related collections, PRECONDITIONS OF THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC OPINION IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, 1964 (ICPSR 7014), and PUBLIC OPINION SURVEYS: WEST GERMANY, DECEMBER 1968 (ICPSR 7091).

The National Public Opinion Reference Survey (NPORS) is an annual survey of U.S. adults conducted by the Pew Research Center. Respondents can answer either by paper or online, and they are selected using address-based sampling. The Pew Research Center uses NPORS to produce benchmark estimates for several topics, such as Americans' political and religious affiliations.

NPORS was conducted for the Pew Research Center by Ipsos. Participants were first mailed an invitation to complete an online survey. A paper survey was later mailed to those who did not respond. In total, 1,550 respondents completed the survey online and 2,387 respondents completed the paper survey. The survey was administered in English and Spanish.

Market researchers investigate clients' target markets' behaviour, values and opinions, providing insights that allow them to tailor their products, services and marketing. Researchers rely on hefty European research and development expenditure to fuel demand for market research. The surge in digitalisation has opened new doors for market research providers while intensifying competition. Artificial intelligence is increasingly important in analysing, identifying and generating research insights from social media posts using a flood of data. Meanwhile, digital surveys have allowed research companies to expand their outreach, save resources and costs and often attain more accurate and comprehensive insights for clients. Over the five years through 2025, industry revenue is expected to contract at a compound annual rate of 1.1% to reach €25.2 billion. The high inflationary environment in recent years has taken a toll on market research budgets. A sharp contraction in business sentiment squeezed corporate profit in 2022, discouraging companies from investing in research and development activities and negatively affecting professional research providers. A greater availability of data and alternative research methods means that researchers are competing more and more with in-house research departments. In 2025, industry revenue is expected to drop by 0.3% as consumers are finding their research needs met by AI tools such as ChatGPT, however, this trend is expected to be short-lived as research companies will strive to prove their value to clients. Over the five years through 2030, industry revenue is forecast to swell at a compound annual rate of 3.7% to reach €30.3 billion. Over the coming years, market research companies will face higher external competition from technology specialists leveraging insights internally, constraining revenue growth. Nonetheless, researchers will benefit from expanding online advertising activity. Those incorporating advanced data analytics systems and digital market research technology will remain competitive and benefit from greater digitalisation. Smart mobile surveys will also become an invaluable tool for consumer research companies.

As part of this project, we produced a new dataset, which harmonizes numerous existing public opinion surveys from across the world to create a unique global public opinion dataset. These studies consists of over 1,100 individual country-year datasets. Putting all these together, covers 160 countries and over 3 Million respondents. This research will study the legacy impacts of previous authoritarian regimes on its citizens' political attitudes today. It thereby addresses important and unresolved questions of democratisation, by using a new methodological approach of cohort analysis to examine the lasting legacy of authoritarian dictatorships. Previous research has overlooked the possibility of citizens' formative experiences in non-democratic systems that might impact their political attitudes, values, and behaviour even after the existence of these regimes. We expect that these legacy impacts have important implications for the development of a democratic political culture in transitioning societies.

We will hence develop a new theory of authoritarian socialization, which assumes that different authoritarian regimes vary in the way they suppress their citizens, and that this in turn will lead to distinctive beliefs and behaviour in the population. Studying the experience of whole generations (or cohorts as they are also referred to) who have been socialised under dictatorships makes it possible to investigate whether regimes differ in terms of the impact they may have on their citizens' beliefs. Further we are interested in whether and how this imprint might negatively affect the establishment of a democratic political culture. The objective of this project is to develop a typology of regime characteristics and their lasting impact on the population. We expect that this typology and an accompanying policy brief will inform the practical developmental work of organisations working in transitioning societies.

This objective will be achieved by conducting a comprehensive analysis of post-authoritarian countries from different parts of the world during the entire 20th century that experienced different types and durations of suppression. This includes the military regimes in South America, but also the socialist regimes in the former Eastern block. It is not possible to study the impact of these regimes during their existence, as representative public opinion research is not possible during dictatorships. We argue, however, that this is not necessary. Instead we rely on the method of cohort analysis, developed by the principle investigator Dr. Neundorf. One of the main methodological innovations of this project is that this method allows us to identify distinct characteristics of those generations that were mainly socialised during dictatorships.

To test our new theory of authoritarian socialisation, we will merge existing survey data from numerous post-authoritarian countries. Today this is possible, as survey research and public opinion polls are widespread beyond established Western democracies. For example, since 1995 several Latin American countries annually take part in the Latinobarometro. Other data that will be used include the World Value Survey (1980-2012), and Asiabarometer (2001-2012) as well as all six rounds of the ESRC-funded European Social Survey (2002-2012). The different survey questions included in the diverse datasets will be harmonised so that a joint analysis is possible. This is a major task of this project and will yield a unique longitudinal, global database of individuals' political attitudes and behaviour.

In order to assign the regime characteristics under which each generation grew up, we will further merge existing data sources (e.g. Polity IV and Autocratic Regime Transitions data) on authoritarian regimes to measure the distinct features of each regime. We will focus, on factors such as intra-elite structure, extent, scope and density of repression, and transition to democracy. The two datasets of individual-level survey data and regime characteristics will be jointly analysed using quantitative statistical analysis of hierarchical age, period, cohort analysis to estimate the generational differences in democratic attitudes and behaviour.

The survey contains part of the questions form BBC media survey about media habits. An emphasis is on listening of foreign radio and TV programs in comparison to domestic national or local programmes. To this a bloc of questions is added, dealing with newspaper readership and home media equipment. Separately a part of a questions asks about awareness of symptoms of cancer disease and risk factors from a medical perspective.

EUROPINIONS focuses on the nature and composition of citizens’ EU attitudes. The comparative project investigates the causes of these attitudes, their development over time, and their effects. It focuses on the role of the media as a key antecedent of change. The present datafile encompasses the panel survey. The design of the panel survey is a multi-wave multi-country study. The study includes ten EU member states, in which at least three and at the most seven survey waves have been conducted. Countries are distributed into three subprojects, which differ in the number of survey waves and the content of each respective questionnaire. All survey waves were conducted using Computer Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI). The fieldwork was coordinated by Kantar TNS in Amsterdam and involved Kantar subsidiaries in each country. In every country, a sample was drawn from the respective databases. These databases rely on multiple recruitment strategies, including telephone, face-to-face, and online recruitment. Quotas (on age, gender, region and education) were enforced in sampling from the databases.

Firms in this industry take surveys from a sample of the population and extrapolate the data to make generalities about public opinion.

Politische und sozio-ökonomische Situation, Rolle des Staates, politische Einstellungen und Wahlverhalten.

Themen: Größte Probleme des Landes; bevorzugter Aufenthaltsort; Situation bezüglich Demokratie, Menschenrechte, Respekt vor der Arbeit, Wohnen, Beschäftigung, Gesetzestreue, Bildung, Kultur, Kindererziehung, Gesundheit und Einfluß auf Regierungsbeschlüsse; Glücksgefühl (Skala); Regierungsausgaben für Umwelt, Gesundheit, Polizei, Bildung, Militär und Verteidigung, Renten, Arbeitslosenunterstützung, Kultur und Kunst; Zuständigkeit der Regierung für Beschäftigung, Preiskontrolle, Gesundheitsversorgung, Lebensstandard; Unterstützung der Industrie und Einkommensunterschiede; Verringerung der Einkommensunterschiede; Zulänglichkeit der Einkommens; Zufriedenheit mit der Demokratie und der Situation der eigenen Familie; Zustand der Gesellschaft; Vertrauen in Institutionen; Erfolg der Arbeit von Parlament, Regierung, Premierminister, Präsident und aller Ministerien; Nutzen der Europäischen Union; Rating der politischen Parteien; Parteipräferenz (Sonntagsfrage); Links-Rechts-Selbsteinstufung; Parteiverbundenheit; letzte Wahlentscheidung; Einschätzung der Zeit vor 1990; Nationalität; Religiosität; Kirchgangshäufigkeit; Religion; monatliches Haushaltseinkommen; Besitz von Haushaltsgeräten, Auto und Haus; sozialen Selbsteinstufung; Wohnort.

Graph and download economic data for Total Revenue for Marketing Research and Public Opinion Polling, All Establishments, Employer Firms (REVEF54191ALLEST) from 1998 to 2022 about public, employer firms, accounting, revenue, establishments, services, and USA.

The Latin America Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) implemented this survey in Haiti as part of its 2008 of round surveys. The 2008 survey was conducted by Vanderbilt University and Borge y Asociados.,

The Latin America Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) implemented this survey in El Salvador as part of its 2012 round of surveys. The 2012 survey was conducted by Vanderbilt University and FUNDAUNGO.

Abstract

The Country Opinion Survey in Mali assists the World Bank Group (WBG) in gaining a better understanding of how stakeholders in Mali perceive the WBG. It provides the WBG with systematic feedback from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society in Mali on 1) their views regarding the general environment in Mali; 2) their overall attitudes toward the WBG in Mali; 3) overall impressions of the WBG’s effectiveness and results, knowledge work and activities, and communication and information sharing in Mali; and 4) their perceptions of the WBG’s future role in Mali.

Geographic coverage

• Bamako
• Kayes
• Koulikoro
• Sikasso
• Segou
• Mopti
• Tombouctou
• Gao
• Kidal
• Taoudenit
• Menaka

Analysis unit

Stakeholder

Universe

Opinion leaders from national and local governments, multilateral/bilateral agencies, media, academia, the private sector, and civil society.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

From March to July 2020, 938 stakeholders of the WBG in Mali were invited to provide their opinions on the WBG’s work in the country by participating in a Country Opinion Survey. Participants were drawn from the Office of the President, Prime Minister; offices of a Minister; offices of a Parliamentarian; employees of ministries/ministerial departments/implementation agencies; Project Management Units (PMUs) overseeing implementation of WBG projects; consultants/contractors working on WBG-supported projects/programs; local governments; independent government institutions; the judicial system; state-owned enterprises; bilateral and multilateral agencies; private sector organizations; the financial sector/private banks; private foundations; NGOs and community-based organizations; trade unions; faith-based groups; youth groups; academia/research institutes/think tanks; and the media.

Mode of data collection

Other [oth]

Research instrument

The questionnaire used to collect the survey data consisted of the following 8 sections: A. Overall Context B. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group C. World Bank Group’s Work and Engagement on the Ground D. World Bank Group’s Support in Development Areas E. World Bank Group’s Knowledge Work and Activities F. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Mali G. Communication and Information Sharing H. Background Information

The questionnaire was prepared in English and French.

Response rate

Response rate was 54%.

The Latin America Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) implemented this survey in Mexico as part of its 2004 round surveys. The 2004 survey was conducted by Vanderbilt University and ITAM.

The Latin America Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) implemented this survey in Guyana as part of its 2008 of round surveys. The 2008 survey was conducted by Vanderbilt University funded by USAID.,

Provide nationwide market research and public opinion survey industry (IZ15010) company registration data.