It is a service that provides public procurement statistical information to identify the overall scale of public procurement by collecting electronic contract information and non-electronic contract information concluded in 24 electronic procurement systems, including Nara Market. Search conditions are set by base year and base year and month range. Overall procurement performance, status by contract method, regional restriction status, procurement status by organization type, procurement status by company type, procurement status by contract method, performance by company type by demand organization, performance by business object by demand organization, performance by system type by demand organization, You can view performance by contract method by procurement company, performance by business target by procurement company, and performance by item and service by each type.

TED (Tenders Electronic Daily) is the 'Supplement to the Official Journal of the EU ("OJ S"), dedicated to European public procurement.

You will find information on public procurement contracts, according to the EU rules on public procurements, of notices published in EU Member States, European Economic Area (EEA) and beyond.

You can browse, search and sort procurement notices by country, region, business sector and more.

TED (Tender Electronic daily) website currently offers bulk downloads of XML packages, for registered users, in the page "Download XML Packages" (https://ted.europa.eu/en/simap/xml-bulk-download) .

The XML packages are divided into:

• daily editions of the Supplement of the Official Journal;

• monthly collections, starting from January 2011.

A subset of Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) data covering most important fields from contract notices and contract award notices in CSV format is available at https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/ted-csv”).

The Global Public Procurement Database constitutes a World Bank initiative aiming to promote procurement reform and innovation by improved transparency and knowledge-sharing. The GPPD goal is to: capture diagnostic procurement related information that is expected to form a common, worldwide standard for collecting and sharing information on public procurement : a) governance, b) operations, c) systems and d) results per country provide substantial contribution for country procurement reforms and eProcurement implementations in order to increase development outcomes create appropriate channels for information dissemination and knowledge sharing, facilitating synergies between existing procurement communities. Based on the above, the GPPD is expected to enable public procurement stakeholders to perform efficiently, effectively, consistently and based on best practices. It is furthermore anticipated the GPPD to contribute in modernization and strengthening of public procurement systems worldwide. The GPPD is commissioned by the World Bank and implemented by European Dynamics SA. For further information, please contact: gppd@worldbank.org

In 2020, the market size of the public procurement market was over *** trillion South Korean won. Public procurement is the process in which government and other public institutions buy goods and services that they need from other companies.

Schemas of essential public order data ## Description of essential data schemas: The data schemas presented up to version 1.5 govern the structure of the data published by public buyers on their buyer profile, until 31 December 2023. These formats are the technical translation of the regulatory texts published on 14 April 2017 and updated on 22 March 2019. The data schemas presented from version 2.0 govern the structure of the data to be published by public buyers on the national open data portal as of 1 January 2024. These formats are the technical translation of the orders relating to essential public procurement data and concession contracts of 22 December 2022. Public buyers must publish their procurement and concession contract data in this format as of January 1, 2024, on their buyer profile. This data schema includes: • The link to the Github repository, which contains examples of data and schema repositories in PDF format; • Schemas (JSON and XML) to verify the validity of published data. ## Versions: ### Version 2.0 (decisions of 22 December 2022): The version 2.0 schema is a new scheme taking into account the changes made by the decrees of 22 December 2022. These orders are to: — the merging of census data and key public procurement data into a single list entitled ‘essential public procurement data’ from EUR 40 000 excluding taxes; — maintaining the publication of the essential data of the concession contracts; — the publication of these essential data on the national open data portal and no longer on the buyer profile. This is the scheme that must be followed for the publication of essential data for the contracts notified from 1 January 2024 and for concession contracts concluded from that date. ### Version 1.5 (Order of March 22, 2019): Schema version 1.5 is a new scheme taking into account the changes made by the Order of 22 March 2019 (changes in the list of procurement procedures). This is the recommended scheme for the publication of essential data until 31 December 2023. Only differences with schema version 1.4: in the list of values for the procedure field of a contract. — the values “Competitive procedure with negotiation” and “Procedure negotiated with prior competition” of version 1.4 are replaced by the value Procedure with negotiation in version 1.5 — the value “Market negotiated without advertising or prior competition” of version 1.4 is replaced by the value “Purchased without advertising or prior competition” in version 1.5 ### Version 1.4 (Amendment Order of 27 July 2018): The schema version 1.4 corresponds to the data structure in force for several months, which corresponds to the provisions of the amending decree of 27 July 2018. The data published in this format is still valid, as it can easily be converted to conform to version 1.5. However, it is recommended to comply with the schema in version 1.5. ### Your comments Your questions and comments are welcome — in section Discussion below — on the forum of Etalab ### See also — consolidated files of essential public order data — Order of 14 April 2017 on essential data in public order (amended by the Decree of 27 July 2018) — Amending Order of 27 July 2018 on essential data on public ordering — Order of 22 March 2019 on essential data on public ordering — Order of 22 December 2022 on essential public procurement data — Order of 22 December 2022 on essential data for concession contracts — the thematic website of the Legal Affairs Directorate of the Ministry of Finance and the “Very Practical Guides” on the dematerialisation of public procurement — Order of 14 April 2017 on functionalities and minimum requirements for buyer profiles

Abstract

The objective of the survey is to develop a systematic approach to study and improve public administration in Brazil. The survey aims to diagnose the needs, attitudes, motivations, organizational environments, and general practices of public servants and their organizational units. The study encompasses federal public administration employees, with a special focus on the public procurement function.

Geographic coverage

Public procurement official across the country

Analysis unit

Individual public procurement officials

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The survey targeted key agents working in the Brazilian procurement process, whose actions are fundamental in determining the efficiency of public procurement. These agents include auctioneers, procurement managers, and planning officers. We targeted procurement agents from all Brazilian federal public organizations that conducted at least one purchase between 2019 and 2023.

We used administrative data from ComprasNet, the main federal government management information system for public procurement, to identify and obtain contact information for procurement auctioneers. This system records every bid and public contract from the federal government. For each bid, it is possible to identify and track (by unique national ID) the auctioneer of the bid, and the homologator associated with it — the individual administratively responsible for approving the results of the bidding process. Given that we have access to the universe of tenders from the federal government spanning from 2019 to 2023, we are able to identify and connect, to each bid, the entire set of auctioneers over this period. We identified and obtained contact information for 11,215 auctioneers. The MGI distributed the online survey to these individuals via SouGov, an internal messaging platform used by the federal government. Information on procurement managers and planning officers is unavailable in Compras- Net, preventing us from linking these individuals to specific bids or directly obtaining their contact information. To reach these public servants, we employed an indirect and non-targeted dissemination strategy. MGI sent private messages with the link to the survey to all users of the Procurement Portal of the Federal Government (Portal de Compras do Governo Federal) — an intranet for public servants involved in public procurement. It is important to note that every individual with access to the portal, regardless of their procurement role, received an invitation to participate in the survey. Consequently, we received responses to the survey from a wide range of procurement officers, including those originally targeted as well as others not in our target population, such as contract managers and homologators, has become mandatory since 2019.

Information on procurement managers and planning officers is unavailable in Compras- Net, preventing us from linking these individuals to specific bids or directly obtaining their contact information. To reach these public servants, we employed an indirect and non- targeted dissemination strategy. MGI sent private messages with the link to the survey to all users of the Procurement Portal of the Federal Government (Portal de Compras do Governo Federal)—an intranet for public servants involved in public procurement. It is important to note that every individual with access to the portal, regardless of their procurement role, received an invitation to participate in the survey. Consequently, we received responses to the survey from a wide range of procurement officers, including those originally targeted as well as others not in our target population, such as contract managers and homologators.

Mode of data collection

Internet [int]

Research instrument

The survey consists of eight modules, along with an additional section including socioeconomic and demographic questions. 1. Respondents’ trajectory in the public sector, and measures tenure, experience with procurement, and task-time allocation. 2. Motivation for their job, perceptions about task significance, and motivation with public service in general. 3. Job satisfaction, including with salary, manager and peers. 4. Personality traits (Big-5) and risk-taking behaviors. 5. Perception of procurement performance as important for advancing their careers in the public sector. 6. "Red tape" (perceptions and experience with rules). 7. Procurement practices at organizational level. 8. Respondents’ perceptions of their influence on procurement outcomes, including the prices paid and the quality of products purchased.

Questionnaires in Portuguese (original language) and English are provided as attachments.

Cleaning operations

The data has been processed to remove any identifying information, including names and email voluntary informed by respondents. We have also recoded the variable for purchasing unit to only identify those with at least 10 respondents; the remaining are pooled as "other".

The full sample in this catalog contains 1,334 respondents and include a subsample of late respondents not used in the report attached. Observations used in the report are coded as "1" in the variable "Wave".

A subset of Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) data covering public procurement for the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the Republic of North Macedonia from 2006-01-01 to 2019-12-31 in comma separated value format. This data includes the most important fields from the contract notice and contract award notice standard forms, such as who bought what from whom, for how much, and which procedure and award criteria were used.

Generally, the data consists of tenders above the procurement thresholds. However, publishing below threshold tenders in TED is considered good practice, and thus a non-negligible number of below threshold tenders is present as well.

Please see the document below for important information on the data and its usage, including a version history of the export.

The European Commission is interested in the results of research on public procurement coming from the re-use of this data. Thus, we will be grateful to receive links to any papers, reports, or applications at GROW-B4@ec.europa.eu.

TED with broader coverage is also available in XML format at https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/ted-1.

Government Procurement Tools Market Outlook

The global market size for Government Procurement Tools was valued at approximately USD 7.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 14.2 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 7.2% from 2024 to 2032. One of the key growth factors driving this market is the increasing adoption of digital solutions to streamline procurement processes in various government sectors. Governments around the world are increasingly investing in procurement tools to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and ensure transparency in spending.

The escalating demand for e-procurement solutions is a significant growth factor in the Government Procurement Tools market. e-Procurement systems automate and integrate the entire procurement cycle, from requisition to invoice reconciliation, thereby minimizing manual errors and improving compliance with procurement policies. Governments are under pressure to adopt such systems due to stringent regulatory requirements and the need for enhanced transparency and accountability in public spending. Additionally, e-Procurement solutions provide real-time data and analytics, enabling informed decision-making and better supplier management.

Advancements in technology, particularly cloud computing and big data analytics, are radically transforming the government procurement landscape. Cloud-based procurement tools offer scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency, making them particularly attractive for government entities that need to manage large volumes of procurement data. Big data analytics, on the other hand, enable governments to perform spend analysis, identify cost-saving opportunities, and optimize procurement strategies. These technological advancements are propelling the adoption of modern procurement tools in the public sector.

Another driving factor for the Government Procurement Tools market is the increasing focus on vendor management and contract management. Effective vendor management helps in building strong supplier relationships, ensuring quality, and reducing risks. Contract management tools help in monitoring compliance, managing contract lifecycles, and ensuring that contractual obligations are met. As governments seek to improve their procurement processes, the demand for comprehensive vendor and contract management solutions is on the rise.

Procurement Analytics Software is increasingly becoming a vital component in the government procurement landscape. This software enables government agencies to harness the power of data to gain insights into procurement activities, supplier performance, and spending patterns. By leveraging advanced analytics, governments can make data-driven decisions that enhance procurement efficiency and transparency. The integration of procurement analytics software with existing procurement tools allows for a more comprehensive approach to managing procurement processes, ultimately leading to cost savings and improved supplier relationships. As governments continue to prioritize digital transformation, the adoption of procurement analytics software is expected to rise, providing a competitive edge in managing public funds effectively.

Regionally, North America is expected to dominate the Government Procurement Tools market due to the early adoption of advanced procurement technologies and the presence of major market players. However, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period. The rapid digitization of government processes in countries like China and India, along with increasing government initiatives to enhance procurement efficiency, are driving the market in this region.

Type Analysis

The Government Procurement Tools market is segmented by type into e-Procurement, Vendor Management, Contract Management, Spend Analysis, and others. e-Procurement solutions are expected to hold the largest market share due to their ability to automate and streamline the entire procurement process. These solutions help in reducing manual errors, improving compliance, and ensuring transparency in procurement activities. The growing focus on digital transformation within government entities is further driving the adoption of e-Procurement solutions.

Vendor Management tools are crucial for government agencies to manage their relationships with suppliers effectively. These tools help in assessing vendor performance, ensuring compliance with contractual

In 2020, Public Procurement Service procured goods and services worth over ** trillion South Korean won in South Korea. Public Procurement Service is the government organization of South Korea that handles the procurement of goods and services needed by public institutions.

We examine a new dataset of public procurement laws, practice, and outcomes in 187 countries. We measure regulation as restrictions on the discretion of the procuring entities. We find that laws and practice are highly correlated with each other across countries, and better practice are correlated with better outcomes, but laws themselves are not correlated with outcomes. A closer look shows that stricter laws correlate with improved outcomes, but only in countries with low public sector capacity. We present a model of procurement in which both regulatory rules and public sector capacity determine procurement outcomes. In the model, regulation is effective in countries with low public sector capacity, but not in countries with high capacity because it inhibits the socially optimal exercise of discretion to exclude low quality bidders.

Context

Law 190 2012 requires public administrations and public controlled companies to publish data regarding the contracting tendering procedures. The data must be published on the institution’s website (or in the case of a publicly owned company that does not have a website on the website of the parent administration) within the sections “Amministrazione Trasparente” or “Società Trasparente”, for public administrations and publicly owned or controlled corporations respectively in XML format.

The main defect of the regulation is that the data are not collected in a single database but remain disseminated on the websites of public administrations, which hinders large-scale analysis. The following database wants to fill this gap by aggregating all the information provided by all the subjects to the law 190/2012.

Data Collection and Exploration

The aforementioned set of regulations requires public administrations and public-controlled companies to publish data regarding the contracting tendering procedures. The law gives indications of a content nature, leaving the technical aspects to the implementing decrees. In general, it is important to notice that the data must be published on the institution’s website (or in the case of a publicly owned company that does not have a website on the website of the parent administration) within the sections “Amministrazione Trasparente” or “Società Trasparente”, for public administrations and publicly owned or controlled corporations respectively.

The problem with the current data management system

The legislator indicates the XML as the format to be used. The use of XML, which is the same used for the electronic invoicing system recently implemented, presents several advantages like the fact that it is platform and programming language independent, supporting technological changes when that happens. Moreover, the data stored and transported using XML can be changed at any point in time without affecting the data presentation. Although the technical advantages brought by XML, from a citizen perspective (with very low data literacy) it presents some drawbacks. Despite XML format being human-readable and some browsers can open it, it is harder to manipulate and query compared to a more popular format like an excel file. To overcome this obstacle it is desirable that each website of the public administration is equipped with an interface that allows citizens to view the information contained in these files and that to conduct simple queries. Unfortunately, from a high-level overview, this best practice seems not yet widespread.

Another important aspect is that the data are not collected in a single database but remain disseminated on the websites of public administrations. This organizational framework allows citizens and investigative journalists to inspect the data only within the perimeter of a single institution (public administration or publicly owned company) while extending the analysis on other dimensions remains out of reach for the average user. For example, while it is relatively easy to see all the tenders with the relative winner tenderers of a given institution it is not possible without further processing to see all the winning bids of a tenderer, or the details of all published tenders in a given geographical region. In general, a systematic analysis of the state of health of public tenders is not possible without intensive prior aggregation and processing activity.

From here derives the need for a comprehensive database that contains all the information provided by all the subjects to the law 190/2012. Unfortunately, this database is not provided by the public authority nor by the controlling authority ANAC. Hence the creation of this dataset

File download

As we already mentioned ANAC does not collect and organize the data required by the 190/2012 law in a single database, however, each law’s subject has to send each year a pec email (certified email) to ANAC that contains the link of the requested XML file stored in the institutional website or in a third-party provider.

ANAC conducts an access test to check that the link provided by the public administration is functioning and that the file complies with the prescribed XML structure. Then ANAC published the result of this activity in its open data section by showing the generalities of the institutions, the result of the test (pass/failed), and the link to the file.

It is noteworthy that ANAC does not actively persecute those institutions that present irregularities in the data provided nor check whether all the institutions provide the requested data. ANAC perimeter of action in this sense is limited to the publication of test data while it is the responsibility of the public administration to check the outcome and resolve any rep...

The Register of Public Sector Contracts is the central official public procurement information system and, as such, the support for public procurement knowledge, analysis and research, for public procurement statistics, for compliance with national and international public procurement information obligations, for communications of contract data to other government bodies, in accordance with the principle of transparency.

Lists of essential data for public procurement in Aude. The table below includes essential data for public procurement and framework agreements for the Aude Department. relating to concession contracts, by article 107 of decree no. 2016-360 relating to public procurement, and by article 94 of decree no. 2016-361 relating to public defense or security procurement, the obligation buyers and granting authorities to publish on their buyer profile the list of essential data of their public contracts or concession contracts and their possible modifications meets an objective of transparency of public data. These texts echo the law for a Digital Republic (n°2016-1321 of October 7, 2016), and in article 10 of law n° 2000-321 of April 12, 2000 relating to the rights of citizens in their relations with the administrations. The requirement of transparency and the opening of public procurement data meets several objectives: it is likely to contribute to the prevention and fight against corruption, the proper management of public funds, the management of purchasing policies and the economic development of companies, which will be able to use this data either to better meet the needs of public purchasers, or to develop new services for the improvement of public procurement policies. The decree of 14 April 2017 relating to essential data in public procurement specifies the list of essential data to be published for each public procurement procedure launched as of October 1, 2018 and for which the amount exceeds €25,000 excluding tax. Also affected are concession contracts and contract amendments.

Centralization of public procurement can lower prices for the government's direct purchase of goods and services. This paper focuses on indirect savings. Public administrations that do not procure directly through a central procurement agency might benefit from the availability of centrally-procured goods. We exploit the introduction of a central purchasing agency in Italy and find that prices came down by 22% among administrations that bought autonomously. These indirect effects appear to be driven by informational externalities, especially for less competent public buyers purchasing technologically more complex goods. Accounting for indirect savings increases the estimate of direct ones.

🇫🇷 프랑스

This data package includes the underlying data and files to replicate the calculations, charts, and tables presented in Public procurement in law and practice, PIIE Working Paper 20-14.

If you use the data, please cite as: Bosio, Erica, Simeon Djankov, Edward Glaeser, and Andrei Shleifer. (2020). Public procurement in law and practice. PIIE Working Paper 20-14. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

communication of the essential data of the public order of the municipality of Varennes-Jarcy

Comprehensive dataset of 12 Public procurement services in South Korea as of August, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

Public contracts with the City of Bloomington since 2018.

The files refer to the structured data model defined by the advisors of the "Rede de Padronização de Dados Abertos", object of analysis in the article OPEN DATA STANDARD IN PUBLIC PURCHASES AND CONTRACTS: A COLLABORATIVE CONSTRUCTION published by RAC (Revista de Administração Contemporânea) . The code documentation, with a precise description of the system, can be found at the link: https://rededadosabertos.blumenau.sc.gov.br/publicdata/swagger/index.html