https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-standalone.htmlhttps://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-standalone.html
Replication pack, FSE2018 submission #164: ------------------------------------------
**Working title:** Ecosystem-Level Factors Affecting the Survival of Open-Source Projects: A Case Study of the PyPI Ecosystem **Note:** link to data artifacts is already included in the paper. Link to the code will be included in the Camera Ready version as well. Content description =================== - **ghd-0.1.0.zip** - the code archive. This code produces the dataset files described below - **settings.py** - settings template for the code archive. - **dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip** - the minimally sufficient version of the dataset. This dataset only includes stats aggregated by the ecosystem (PyPI) - **dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz** - full version of the dataset, including project-level statistics. It is ~34Gb unpacked. This dataset still doesn't include PyPI packages themselves, which take around 2TB. - **build_model.r, helpers.r** - R files to process the survival data (`survival_data.csv` in **dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip**, `common.cache/survival_data.pypi_2008_2017-12_6.csv` in **dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz**) - **Interview protocol.pdf** - approximate protocol used for semistructured interviews. - LICENSE - text of GPL v3, under which this dataset is published - INSTALL.md - replication guide (~2 pages)
Replication guide ================= Step 0 - prerequisites ---------------------- - Unix-compatible OS (Linux or OS X) - Python interpreter (2.7 was used; Python 3 compatibility is highly likely) - R 3.4 or higher (3.4.4 was used, 3.2 is known to be incompatible) Depending on detalization level (see Step 2 for more details): - up to 2Tb of disk space (see Step 2 detalization levels) - at least 16Gb of RAM (64 preferable) - few hours to few month of processing time Step 1 - software ---------------- - unpack **ghd-0.1.0.zip**, or clone from gitlab: git clone https://gitlab.com/user2589/ghd.git git checkout 0.1.0 `cd` into the extracted folder. All commands below assume it as a current directory. - copy `settings.py` into the extracted folder. Edit the file: * set `DATASET_PATH` to some newly created folder path * add at least one GitHub API token to `SCRAPER_GITHUB_API_TOKENS` - install docker. For Ubuntu Linux, the command is `sudo apt-get install docker-compose` - install libarchive and headers: `sudo apt-get install libarchive-dev` - (optional) to replicate on NPM, install yajl: `sudo apt-get install yajl-tools` Without this dependency, you might get an error on the next step, but it's safe to ignore. - install Python libraries: `pip install --user -r requirements.txt` . - disable all APIs except GitHub (Bitbucket and Gitlab support were not yet implemented when this study was in progress): edit `scraper/init.py`, comment out everything except GitHub support in `PROVIDERS`. Step 2 - obtaining the dataset ----------------------------- The ultimate goal of this step is to get output of the Python function `common.utils.survival_data()` and save it into a CSV file: # copy and paste into a Python console from common import utils survival_data = utils.survival_data('pypi', '2008', smoothing=6) survival_data.to_csv('survival_data.csv') Since full replication will take several months, here are some ways to speedup the process: ####Option 2.a, difficulty level: easiest Just use the precomputed data. Step 1 is not necessary under this scenario. - extract **dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip** - get `survival_data.csv`, go to the next step ####Option 2.b, difficulty level: easy Use precomputed longitudinal feature values to build the final table. The whole process will take 15..30 minutes. - create a folder `
We present a flora and fauna dataset for the Mira-Mataje binational basins. This is an area shared between southwestern Colombia and northwestern Ecuador, where both the Chocó and Tropical Andes biodiversity hotspots converge. Information from 120 sources was systematized in the Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A) standard and geospatial vector data format for geographic information systems (GIS) (shapefiles). Sources included natural history museums, published literature, and citizen science repositories across 18 countries. The resulting database has 33,460 records from 5,281 species, of which 1,083 are endemic and 680 threatened. The diversity represented in the dataset is equivalent to 10\% of the total plant species and 26\% of the total terrestrial vertebrate species in the hotspots. It corresponds to 0.07\% of their total area. The dataset can be used to estimate and compare biodiversity patterns with environmental parameters and provide value to ecosystems, ecoregions, and protected areas. The dataset is a baseline for future assessments of biodiversity in the face of environmental degradation, climate change, and accelerated extinction processes. The data has been formally presented in the manuscript entitled "The Tropical Andes Biodiversity Hotspot: A Comprehensive Dataset for the Mira-Mataje Binational Basins" in the journal "Scientific Data". To maintain DOI integrity, this version will not change after publication of the manuscript and therefore we cannot provide further references on volume, issue, and DOI of manuscript publication. - Data format 1: The .rds file extension saves a single object to be read in R and provides better compression, serialization, and integration within the R environment, than simple .csv files. The description of file names is in the original manuscript. -- m_m_flora_2021_voucher_ecuador.rds -- m_m_flora_2021_observation_ecuador.rds -- m_m_flora_2021_total_ecuador.rds -- m_m_fauna_2021_ecuador.rds - Data format 2: The .csv file has been encoded in UTF-8, and is an ASCII file with text separated by commas. The description of file names is in the original manuscript. -- m_m_flora_fauna_2021_all.zip. This file includes all biodiversity datasets. -- m_m_flora_2021_voucher_ecuador.csv -- m_m_flora_2021_observation_ecuador.csv -- m_m_flora_2021_total_ecuador.csv -- m_m_fauna_2021_ecuador.csv - Data format 3: We consolidated a shapefile for the basin containing layers for vegetation ecosystems and the total number of occurrences, species, and endemic and threatened species for each ecosystem. -- biodiversity_measures_mira_mataje.zip. This file includes the .shp file and accessory geomatic files. - A set of 3D shaded-relief map representations of the data in the shapefile can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23499180.v4 Three taxonomic data tables were used in our technical validation of the presented dataset. These three files are: 1) the_catalog_of_life.tsv (Source: Bánki, O. et al. Catalogue of life checklist (version 2024-03-26). https://doi.org/10.48580/dfz8d (2024)) 2) world_checklist_of_vascular_plants_names.csv (we are also including ancillary tables "world_checklist_of_vascular_plants_distribution.csv", and "README_world_checklist_of_vascular_plants_.xlsx") (Source: Govaerts, R., Lughadha, E. N., Black, N., Turner, R. & Paton, A. The World Checklist of Vascular Plants is a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci. Data 8, 215, 10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6 (2021).) 3) world_flora_online.csv (Source: The World Flora Online Consortium et al. World flora online plant list December 2023, 10.5281/zenodo.10425161 (2023).)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset includes all the data and R code needed to reproduce the analyses in a forthcoming manuscript:Copes, W. E., Q. D. Read, and B. J. Smith. Environmental influences on drying rate of spray applied disinfestants from horticultural production services. PhytoFrontiers, DOI pending.Study description: Instructions for disinfestants typically specify a dose and a contact time to kill plant pathogens on production surfaces. A problem occurs when disinfestants are applied to large production areas where the evaporation rate is affected by weather conditions. The common contact time recommendation of 10 min may not be achieved under hot, sunny conditions that promote fast drying. This study is an investigation into how the evaporation rates of six commercial disinfestants vary when applied to six types of substrate materials under cool to hot and cloudy to sunny weather conditions. Initially, disinfestants with low surface tension spread out to provide 100% coverage and disinfestants with high surface tension beaded up to provide about 60% coverage when applied to hard smooth surfaces. Disinfestants applied to porous materials were quickly absorbed into the body of the material, such as wood and concrete. Even though disinfestants evaporated faster under hot sunny conditions than under cool cloudy conditions, coverage was reduced considerably in the first 2.5 min under most weather conditions and reduced to less than or equal to 50% coverage by 5 min. Dataset contents: This dataset includes R code to import the data and fit Bayesian statistical models using the model fitting software CmdStan, interfaced with R using the packages brms and cmdstanr. The models (one for 2022 and one for 2023) compare how quickly different spray-applied disinfestants dry, depending on what chemical was sprayed, what surface material it was sprayed onto, and what the weather conditions were at the time. Next, the statistical models are used to generate predictions and compare mean drying rates between the disinfestants, surface materials, and weather conditions. Finally, tables and figures are created. These files are included:Drying2022.csv: drying rate data for the 2022 experimental runWeather2022.csv: weather data for the 2022 experimental runDrying2023.csv: drying rate data for the 2023 experimental runWeather2023.csv: weather data for the 2023 experimental rundisinfestant_drying_analysis.Rmd: RMarkdown notebook with all data processing, analysis, and table creation codedisinfestant_drying_analysis.html: rendered output of notebookMS_figures.R: additional R code to create figures formatted for journal requirementsfit2022_discretetime_weather_solar.rds: fitted brms model object for 2022. This will allow users to reproduce the model prediction results without having to refit the model, which was originally fit on a high-performance computing clusterfit2023_discretetime_weather_solar.rds: fitted brms model object for 2023data_dictionary.xlsx: descriptions of each column in the CSV data files
https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Pathogen diversity resulting in quasispecies can enable persistence and adaptation to host defenses and therapies. However, accurate quasispecies characterization can be impeded by errors introduced during sample handling and sequencing which can require extensive optimizations to overcome. We present complete laboratory and bioinformatics workflows to overcome many of these hurdles. The Pacific Biosciences single molecule real-time platform was used to sequence PCR amplicons derived from cDNA templates tagged with universal molecular identifiers (SMRT-UMI). Optimized laboratory protocols were developed through extensive testing of different sample preparation conditions to minimize between-template recombination during PCR and the use of UMI allowed accurate template quantitation as well as removal of point mutations introduced during PCR and sequencing to produce a highly accurate consensus sequence from each template. Handling of the large datasets produced from SMRT-UMI sequencing was facilitated by a novel bioinformatic pipeline, Probabilistic Offspring Resolver for Primer IDs (PORPIDpipeline), that automatically filters and parses reads by sample, identifies and discards reads with UMIs likely created from PCR and sequencing errors, generates consensus sequences, checks for contamination within the dataset, and removes any sequence with evidence of PCR recombination or early cycle PCR errors, resulting in highly accurate sequence datasets. The optimized SMRT-UMI sequencing method presented here represents a highly adaptable and established starting point for accurate sequencing of diverse pathogens. These methods are illustrated through characterization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) quasispecies.
Methods
This serves as an overview of the analysis performed on PacBio sequence data that is summarized in Analysis Flowchart.pdf and was used as primary data for the paper by Westfall et al. "Optimized SMRT-UMI protocol produces highly accurate sequence datasets from diverse populations – application to HIV-1 quasispecies"
Five different PacBio sequencing datasets were used for this analysis: M027, M2199, M1567, M004, and M005
For the datasets which were indexed (M027, M2199), CCS reads from PacBio sequencing files and the chunked_demux_config files were used as input for the chunked_demux pipeline. Each config file lists the different Index primers added during PCR to each sample. The pipeline produces one fastq file for each Index primer combination in the config. For example, in dataset M027 there were 3–4 samples using each Index combination. The fastq files from each demultiplexed read set were moved to the sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline fastq folder for further demultiplexing by sample and consensus generation with that pipeline. More information about the chunked_demux pipeline can be found in the README.md file on GitHub.
The demultiplexed read collections from the chunked_demux pipeline or CCS read files from datasets which were not indexed (M1567, M004, M005) were each used as input for the sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline along with each dataset's config file. Each config file contains the primer sequences for each sample (including the sample ID block in the cDNA primer) and further demultiplexes the reads to prepare data tables summarizing all of the UMI sequences and counts for each family (tagged.tar.gz) as well as consensus sequences from each sUMI and rank 1 dUMI family (consensus.tar.gz). More information about the sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline can be found in the paper and the README.md file on GitHub.
The consensus.tar.gz and tagged.tar.gz files were moved from sUMI_dUMI_comparison pipeline directory on the server to the Pipeline_Outputs folder in this analysis directory for each dataset and appended with the dataset name (e.g. consensus_M027.tar.gz). Also in this analysis directory is a Sample_Info_Table.csv containing information about how each of the samples was prepared, such as purification methods and number of PCRs. There are also three other folders: Sequence_Analysis, Indentifying_Recombinant_Reads, and Figures. Each has an .Rmd
file with the same name inside which is used to collect, summarize, and analyze the data. All of these collections of code were written and executed in RStudio to track notes and summarize results.
Sequence_Analysis.Rmd
has instructions to decompress all of the consensus.tar.gz files, combine them, and create two fasta files, one with all sUMI and one with all dUMI sequences. Using these as input, two data tables were created, that summarize all sequences and read counts for each sample that pass various criteria. These are used to help create Table 2 and as input for Indentifying_Recombinant_Reads.Rmd
and Figures.Rmd
. Next, 2 fasta files containing all of the rank 1 dUMI sequences and the matching sUMI sequences were created. These were used as input for the python script compare_seqs.py which identifies any matched sequences that are different between sUMI and dUMI read collections. This information was also used to help create Table 2. Finally, to populate the table with the number of sequences and bases in each sequence subset of interest, different sequence collections were saved and viewed in the Geneious program.
To investigate the cause of sequences where the sUMI and dUMI sequences do not match, tagged.tar.gz was decompressed and for each family with discordant sUMI and dUMI sequences the reads from the UMI1_keeping directory were aligned using geneious. Reads from dUMI families failing the 0.7 filter were also aligned in Genious. The uncompressed tagged folder was then removed to save space. These read collections contain all of the reads in a UMI1 family and still include the UMI2 sequence. By examining the alignment and specifically the UMI2 sequences, the site of the discordance and its case were identified for each family as described in the paper. These alignments were saved as "Sequence Alignments.geneious". The counts of how many families were the result of PCR recombination were used in the body of the paper.
Using Identifying_Recombinant_Reads.Rmd
, the dUMI_ranked.csv file from each sample was extracted from all of the tagged.tar.gz files, combined and used as input to create a single dataset containing all UMI information from all samples. This file dUMI_df.csv was used as input for Figures.Rmd.
Figures.Rmd
used dUMI_df.csv, sequence_counts.csv, and read_counts.csv as input to create draft figures and then individual datasets for eachFigure. These were copied into Prism software to create the final figures for the paper.
This data package is associated with the publication “Investigating the impacts of solid phase extraction on dissolved organic matter optical signatures and the pairing with high-resolution mass spectrometry data in a freshwater system” submitted to “Limnology and Oceanography: Methods.” This data is an extension of the River Corridor and Watershed Biogeochemistry SFA’s Spatial Study 2021 (https://doi.org/10.15485/1898914). Other associated data and field metadata can be found at the link provided. The goal of this manuscript is to assess the impact of solid phase extraction (SPE) on the ability to pair ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry data collected from SPE extracts with optical properties collected on ambient stream samples. Forty-seven samples collected from within the Yakima River Basin, Washington were analyzed dissolved organic carbon (DOC, measured as non-purgeable organic carbon, NPOC), absorbance, and fluorescence. Samples were subsequently concentrated with SPE and reanalyzed for each measurement. The extraction efficiency for the DOC and common optical indices were calculated. In addition, SPE samples were subject to ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry and compared with the ambient and SPE generated optical data. Finally, in addition to this cross-platform inter-comparison, we further performed and intra-comparison among the high-resolution mass spectrometry data to determine the impact of sample preparation on the interpretability of results. Here, the SPE samples were prepared at 40 milligrams per liter (mg/L) based on the known DOC extraction efficiency of the samples (ranging from ~30 to ~75%) compared to the common practice of assuming the DOC extraction efficiency of freshwater samples at 60%. This data package folder consists of one main data folder with one subfolder (Data_Input). The main data folder contains (1) readme; (2) data dictionary (dd); (3) file-level metadata (flmd); (4) final data summary output from processing script; and (5) the processing script. The R-markdown processing script (SPE_Manuscript_Rmarkdown_Data_Package.rmd) contains all code needed to reproduce manuscript statistics and figures (with the exception of that stated below). The Data_Input folder has two subfolders: (1) FTICR and (2) Optics. Additionally, the Data_Input folder contains dissolved organic carbon (DOC, measured as non-purgeable organic carbon, NPOC) data (SPS_NPOC_Summary.csv) and relevant supporting Solid Phase Extraction Volume information (SPS_SPE_Volumes.csv). Methods information for the optical and FTICR data is embedded in the header rows of SPS_EEMs_Methods.csv and SPS_FTICR_Methods.csv, respectively. In addition, the data dictionary (SPS_SPE_dd.csv), file level metadata (SPS_SPE_flmd.csv), and methods codes (SPS_SPE_Methods_codes.csv) are provided. The FTICR subfolder contains all raw FTICR data as well as instructions for processing. In addition, post processed FTICR molecular information (Processed_FTICRMS_Mol.csv) and sample data (Processed_FTICRMS_Data.csv) is provided that can be directly read into R with the associated R-markdown file. The Optics subfolder contains all Absorbance and Fluorescence Spectra. Fluorescence spectra have been blank corrected, inner filter corrected, and undergone scatter removal. In addition, this folder contains Matlab code used to make a portion of Figure 1 within the manuscript, derive various spectral parameters used within the manuscript, and used for parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) modeling. Spectral indices (SPS_SpectralIndices.csv) and PARAFAC outputs (SPS_PARAFAC_Model_Loadings.csv and SPS_PARAFAC_Sample_Scores.csv) are directly read into the associated R-markdown file.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Overview
Data points present in this dataset were obtained following the subsequent steps: To assess the secretion efficiency of the constructs, 96 colonies from the selection plates were evaluated using the workflow presented in Figure Workflow. We picked transformed colonies and cultured in 400 μL TAP medium for 7 days in Deep-well plates (Corning Axygen®, No.: PDW500CS, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA), covered with Breathe-Easy® (Sigma-Aldrich®). Cultivation was performed on a rotary shaker, set to 150 rpm, under constant illumination (50 μmol photons/m2s). Then 100 μL sample were transferred clear bottom 96-well plate (Corning Costar, Tewksbury, MA, USA) and fluorescence was measured using an Infinite® M200 PRO plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Fluorescence was measured at excitation 575/9 nm and emission 608/20 nm. Supernatant samples were obtained by spinning Deep-well plates at 3000 × g for 10 min and transferring 100 μL from each well to the clear bottom 96-well plate (Corning Costar, Tewksbury, MA, USA), followed by fluorescence measurement. To compare the constructs, R Statistic version 3.3.3 was used to perform one-way ANOVA (with Tukey's test), and to test statistical hypotheses, the significance level was set at 0.05. Graphs were generated in RStudio v1.0.136. The codes are deposit herein.
Info
ANOVA_Turkey_Sub.R -> code for ANOVA analysis in R statistic 3.3.3
barplot_R.R -> code to generate bar plot in R statistic 3.3.3
boxplotv2.R -> code to generate boxplot in R statistic 3.3.3
pRFU_+_bk.csv -> relative supernatant mCherry fluorescence dataset of positive colonies, blanked with parental wild-type cc1690 cell of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
sup_+_bl.csv -> supernatant mCherry fluorescence dataset of positive colonies, blanked with parental wild-type cc1690 cell of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
sup_raw.csv -> supernatant mCherry fluorescence dataset of 96 colonies for each construct.
who_+_bl2.csv -> whole culture mCherry fluorescence dataset of positive colonies, blanked with parental wild-type cc1690 cell of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
who_raw.csv -> whole culture mCherry fluorescence dataset of 96 colonies for each construct.
who_+_Chlo.csv -> whole culture chlorophyll fluorescence dataset of 96 colonies for each construct.
Anova_Output_Summary_Guide.pdf -> Explain the ANOVA files content
ANOVA_pRFU_+_bk.doc -> ANOVA of relative supernatant mCherry fluorescence dataset of positive colonies, blanked with parental wild-type cc1690 cell of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
ANOVA_sup_+_bk.doc -> ANOVA of supernatant mCherry fluorescence dataset of positive colonies, blanked with parental wild-type cc1690 cell of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
ANOVA_who_+_bk.doc -> ANOVA of whole culture mCherry fluorescence dataset of positive colonies, blanked with parental wild-type cc1690 cell of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
ANOVA_Chlo.doc -> ANOVA of whole culture chlorophyll fluorescence of all constructs, plus average and standard deviation values.
Consider citing our work.
Molino JVD, de Carvalho JCM, Mayfield SP (2018) Comparison of secretory signal peptides for heterologous protein expression in microalgae: Expanding the secretion portfolio for Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. PLoS ONE 13(2): e0192433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0192433
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is a new version draft of the data files for "Food washing monkeys recognize the law of diminishing returns" by Rosien et al.
The original reviewed pre-print was published on the elife website on 22 July 2024: https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/98520. The data stored here are for the updated version of record.
The published text contains methods justifications and supporting citations.
This dataset was revised based on the recommendations of three reviewers. It now contains:
A general note: when running the scripts, the file path you utilize will differ from the ones utilized in the current text, as it depends on where on one's computer the actual .csv files are stored. The "read.csv" command in the R code will need to be customized to a particular file path.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
analyze the consumer expenditure survey (ce) with r the consumer expenditure survey (ce) is the primo data source to understand how americans spend money. participating households keep a running diary about every little purchase over the year. those diaries are then summed up into precise expenditure categories. how else are you gonna know that the average american household spent $34 (±2) on bacon, $826 (±17) on cellular phones, and $13 (±2) on digital e-readers in 2011? an integral component of the market basket calculation in the consumer price index, this survey recently became available as public-use microdata and they're slowly releasing historical files back to 1996. hooray! for a t aste of what's possible with ce data, look at the quick tables listed on their main page - these tables contain approximately a bazillion different expenditure categories broken down by demographic groups. guess what? i just learned that americans living in households with $5,000 to $9,999 of annual income spent an average of $283 (±90) on pets, toys, hobbies, and playground equipment (pdf page 3). you can often get close to your statistic of interest from these web tables. but say you wanted to look at domestic pet expenditure among only households with children between 12 and 17 years old. another one of the thirteen web tables - the consumer unit composition table - shows a few different breakouts of households with kids, but none matching that exact population of interest. the bureau of labor statistics (bls) (the survey's designers) and the census bureau (the survey's administrators) have provided plenty of the major statistics and breakouts for you, but they're not psychic. if you want to comb through this data for specific expenditure categories broken out by a you-defined segment of the united states' population, then let a little r into your life. fun starts now. fair warning: only analyze t he consumer expenditure survey if you are nerd to the core. the microdata ship with two different survey types (interview and diary), each containing five or six quarterly table formats that need to be stacked, merged, and manipulated prior to a methodologically-correct analysis. the scripts in this repository contain examples to prepare 'em all, just be advised that magnificent data like this will never be no-assembly-required. the folks at bls have posted an excellent summary of what's av ailable - read it before anything else. after that, read the getting started guide. don't skim. a few of the descriptions below refer to sas programs provided by the bureau of labor statistics. you'll find these in the C:\My Directory\CES\2011\docs directory after you run the download program. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2010-2011 - download all microdata.R lo op through every year and download every file hosted on the bls's ce ftp site import each of the comma-separated value files into r with read.csv depending on user-settings, save each table as an r data file (.rda) or stat a-readable file (.dta) 2011 fmly intrvw - analysis examples.R load the r data files (.rda) necessary to create the 'fmly' table shown in the ce macros program documentation.doc file construct that 'fmly' table, using five quarters of interviews (q1 2011 thru q1 2012) initiate a replicate-weighted survey design object perform some lovely li'l analysis examples replicate the %mean_variance() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of calculating descriptive statistics using unimputed variables replicate the %compare_groups() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of performing t -tests using unimputed variables create an rsqlite database (to minimize ram usage) containing the five imputed variable files, after identifying which variables were imputed based on pdf page 3 of the user's guide to income imputation initiate a replicate-weighted, database-backed, multiply-imputed survey design object perform a few additional analyses that highlight the modified syntax required for multiply-imputed survey designs replicate the %mean_variance() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of calculating descriptive statistics using imputed variables repl icate the %compare_groups() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of performing t-tests using imputed variables replicate the %proc_reg() and %proc_logistic() macros found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of regressions and logistic regressions using both unimputed and imputed variables replicate integrated mean and se.R match each step in the bls-provided sas program "integr ated mean and se.sas" but with r instead of sas create an rsqlite database when the expenditure table gets too large for older computers to handle in ram export a table "2011 integrated mean and se.csv" that exactly matches the contents of the sas-produced "2011 integrated mean and se.lst" text file click here to view these three scripts for...
This R program calculates CFI for each patient from analytic data files containing information on patient identifiers, ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes (version 32), ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes (version 2020), CPT codes, and HCPCS codes. NOTE: When downloading, store "CFI_ICD9CM_V32.tab" and "CFI_ICD10CM_V2020.tab" as csv files (these files are originally stored as csv files, but Dataverse automatically converts them to tab files). Please read "Frailty-Index-R-code-Guide" before proceeding. Interpretation, validation data, and annotated references are provided in "Research Background - Claims-Based Frailty Index".
Cyclistic: Google Data Analytics Capstone Project
Cyclistic - Google Data Analytics Certification Capstone Project Moirangthem Arup Singh How Does a Bike-Share Navigate Speedy Success? Background: This project is for the Google Data Analytics Certification capstone project. I am wearing the hat of a junior data analyst working in the marketing analyst team at Cyclistic, a bike-share company in Chicago. Cyclistic is a bike-share program that features more than 5,800 bicycles and 600 docking stations. Cyclistic sets itself apart by also offering reclining bikes, hand tricycles, and cargo bikes, making bike-share more inclusive to people with disabilities and riders who can’t use a standard two-wheeled bike. The majority of riders opt for traditional bikes; about 8% of riders use the assistive options. Cyclistic users are more likely to ride for leisure, but about 30% use them to commute to work each day. Customers who purchase single-ride or full-day passes are referred to as casual riders. Customers who purchase annual memberships are Cyclistic members. The director of marketing believes the company’s future success depends on maximizing the number of annual memberships. Therefore,my team wants to understand how casual riders and annual members use Cyclistic bikes differently. From these insights, my team will design a new marketing strategy to convert casual riders into annual members. But first, Cyclistic executives must approve the recommendations, so they must be backed up with compelling data insights and professional data visualizations. This project will be completed by using the 6 Data Analytics stages: Ask: Identify the business task and determine the key stakeholders. Prepare: Collect the data, identify how it’s organized, determine the credibility of the data. Process: Select the tool for data cleaning, check for errors and document the cleaning process. Analyze: Organize and format the data, aggregate the data so that it’s useful, perform calculations and identify trends and relationships. Share: Use design thinking principles and data-driven storytelling approach, present the findings with effective visualization. Ensure the analysis has answered the business task. Act: Share the final conclusion and the recommendations. Ask: Business Task: Recommend marketing strategies aimed at converting casual riders into annual members by better understanding how annual members and casual riders use Cyclistic bikes differently. Stakeholders: Lily Moreno: The director of marketing and my manager. Cyclistic executive team: A detail-oriented executive team who will decide whether to approve the recommended marketing program. Cyclistic marketing analytics team: A team of data analysts responsible for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data that helps guide Cyclistic’s marketing strategy. Prepare: For this project, I will use the public data of Cyclistic’s historical trip data to analyze and identify trends. The data has been made available by Motivate International Inc. under the license. I downloaded the ZIP files containing the csv files from the above link but while uploading the files in kaggle (as I am using kaggle notebook), it gave me a warning that the dataset is already available in kaggle. So I will be using the dataset cyclictic-bike-share dataset from kaggle. The dataset has 13 csv files from April 2020 to April 2021. For the purpose of my analysis I will use the csv files from April 2020 to March 2021. The source csv files are in Kaggle so I can rely on it's integrity. I am using Microsoft Excel to get a glimpse of the data. There is one csv file for each month and has information about the bike ride which contain details of the ride id, rideable type, start and end time, start and end station, latitude and longitude of the start and end stations. Process: I will use R as language in kaggle to import the dataset to check how it’s organized, whether all the columns have appropriate data type, find outliers and if any of these data have sampling bias. I will be using below R libraries
library(tidyverse) library(lubridate) library(ggplot2) library(plotrix) ── Attaching packages ─────────────────────────────────────── tidyverse 1.3.1 ──
✔ ggplot2 3.3.5 ✔ purrr 0.3.4 ✔ tibble 3.1.4 ✔ dplyr 1.0.7 ✔ tidyr 1.1.3 ✔ stringr 1.4.0 ✔ readr 2.0.1 ✔ forcats 0.5.1
── Conflicts ────────────────────────────────────────── tidyverse_conflicts() ── ✖ dplyr::filter() masks stats::filter() ✖ dplyr::lag() masks stats::lag()
Attaching package: ‘lubridate’
The following objects are masked from ‘package:base’:
date, intersect, setdiff, union
setwd("/kaggle/input/cyclistic-bike-share")
r_202004 <- read.csv("202004-divvy-tripdata.csv") r_202005 <- read.csv("20...
This dataset contains files reconstructing single-cell data presented in 'Reference transcriptomics of porcine peripheral immune cells created through bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing' by Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. 2021. Samples of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from seven pigs and processed for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in order to provide a reference annotation of porcine immune cell transcriptomics at enhanced, single-cell resolution. Analysis of single-cell data allowed identification of 36 cell clusters that were further classified into 13 cell types, including monocytes, dendritic cells, B cells, antibody-secreting cells, numerous populations of T cells, NK cells, and erythrocytes. Files may be used to reconstruct the data as presented in the manuscript, allowing for individual query by other users. Scripts for original data analysis are available at https://github.com/USDA-FSEPRU/PorcinePBMCs_bulkRNAseq_scRNAseq. Raw data are available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB43826. Funding for this dataset was also provided by NRSP8: National Animal Genome Research Program (https://www.nimss.org/projects/view/mrp/outline/18464). Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - All Cells 10X Format. File Name: PBMC7_AllCells.zipResource Description: Zipped folder containing PBMC counts matrix, gene names, and cell IDs. Files are as follows: matrix of gene counts* (matrix.mtx.gx) gene names (features.tsv.gz) cell IDs (barcodes.tsv.gz) *The ‘raw’ count matrix is actually gene counts obtained following ambient RNA removal. During ambient RNA removal, we specified to calculate non-integer count estimations, so most gene counts are actually non-integer values in this matrix but should still be treated as raw/unnormalized data that requires further normalization/transformation. Data can be read into R using the function Read10X().Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - All Cells Metadata. File Name: PBMC7_AllCells_meta.csvResource Description: .csv file containing metadata for cells included in the final dataset. Metadata columns include: nCount_RNA = the number of transcripts detected in a cell nFeature_RNA = the number of genes detected in a cell Loupe = cell barcodes; correspond to the cell IDs found in the .h5Seurat and 10X formatted objects for all cells prcntMito = percent mitochondrial reads in a cell Scrublet = doublet probability score assigned to a cell seurat_clusters = cluster ID assigned to a cell PaperIDs = sample ID for a cell celltypes = cell type ID assigned to a cellResource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - All Cells PCA Coordinates. File Name: PBMC7_AllCells_PCAcoord.csvResource Description: .csv file containing first 100 PCA coordinates for cells. Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - All Cells t-SNE Coordinates. File Name: PBMC7_AllCells_tSNEcoord.csvResource Description: .csv file containing t-SNE coordinates for all cells.Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - All Cells UMAP Coordinates. File Name: PBMC7_AllCells_UMAPcoord.csvResource Description: .csv file containing UMAP coordinates for all cells.Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - CD4 T Cells t-SNE Coordinates. File Name: PBMC7_CD4only_tSNEcoord.csvResource Description: .csv file containing t-SNE coordinates for only CD4 T cells (clusters 0, 3, 4, 28). A dataset of only CD4 T cells can be re-created from the PBMC7_AllCells.h5Seurat, and t-SNE coordinates used in publication can be re-assigned using this .csv file.Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - CD4 T Cells UMAP Coordinates. File Name: PBMC7_CD4only_UMAPcoord.csvResource Description: .csv file containing UMAP coordinates for only CD4 T cells (clusters 0, 3, 4, 28). A dataset of only CD4 T cells can be re-created from the PBMC7_AllCells.h5Seurat, and UMAP coordinates used in publication can be re-assigned using this .csv file.Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - Gamma Delta T Cells UMAP Coordinates. File Name: PBMC7_GDonly_UMAPcoord.csvResource Description: .csv file containing UMAP coordinates for only gamma delta T cells (clusters 6, 21, 24, 31). A dataset of only gamma delta T cells can be re-created from the PBMC7_AllCells.h5Seurat, and UMAP coordinates used in publication can be re-assigned using this .csv file.Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - Gamma Delta T Cells t-SNE Coordinates. File Name: PBMC7_GDonly_tSNEcoord.csvResource Description: .csv file containing t-SNE coordinates for only gamma delta T cells (clusters 6, 21, 24, 31). A dataset of only gamma delta T cells can be re-created from the PBMC7_AllCells.h5Seurat, and t-SNE coordinates used in publication can be re-assigned using this .csv file.Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - Gene Annotation Information. File Name: UnfilteredGeneInfo.txtResource Description: .txt file containing gene nomenclature information used to assign gene names in the dataset. 'Name' column corresponds to the name assigned to a feature in the dataset.Resource Title: Herrera-Uribe & Wiarda et al. PBMCs - All Cells H5Seurat. File Name: PBMC7.tarResource Description: .h5Seurat object of all cells in PBMC dataset. File needs to be untarred, then read into R using function LoadH5Seurat().
Female S. mulitplicata mate preferences were measured via two-choice phonotaxis experiments in the laboratory at University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Detailed data collection methods can be found in the manuscript and associated supplementary methods file.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Complete dataset of “Film Circulation on the International Film Festival Network and the Impact on Global Film Culture”
A peer-reviewed data paper for this dataset is in review to be published in NECSUS_European Journal of Media Studies - an open access journal aiming at enhancing data transparency and reusability, and will be available from https://necsus-ejms.org/ and https://mediarep.org
Please cite this when using the dataset.
Detailed description of the dataset:
1 Film Dataset: Festival Programs
The Film Dataset consists a data scheme image file, a codebook and two dataset tables in csv format.
The codebook (csv file “1_codebook_film-dataset_festival-program”) offers a detailed description of all variables within the Film Dataset. Along with the definition of variables it lists explanations for the units of measurement, data sources, coding and information on missing data.
The csv file “1_film-dataset_festival-program_long” comprises a dataset of all films and the festivals, festival sections, and the year of the festival edition that they were sampled from. The dataset is structured in the long format, i.e. the same film can appear in several rows when it appeared in more than one sample festival. However, films are identifiable via their unique ID.
The csv file “1_film-dataset_festival-program_wide” consists of the dataset listing only unique films (n=9,348). The dataset is in the wide format, i.e. each row corresponds to a unique film, identifiable via its unique ID. For easy analysis, and since the overlap is only six percent, in this dataset the variable sample festival (fest) corresponds to the first sample festival where the film appeared. For instance, if a film was first shown at Berlinale (in February) and then at Frameline (in June of the same year), the sample festival will list “Berlinale”. This file includes information on unique and IMDb IDs, the film title, production year, length, categorization in length, production countries, regional attribution, director names, genre attribution, the festival, festival section and festival edition the film was sampled from, and information whether there is festival run information available through the IMDb data.
2 Survey Dataset
The Survey Dataset consists of a data scheme image file, a codebook and two dataset tables in csv format.
The codebook “2_codebook_survey-dataset” includes coding information for both survey datasets. It lists the definition of the variables or survey questions (corresponding to Samoilova/Loist 2019), units of measurement, data source, variable type, range and coding, and information on missing data.
The csv file “2_survey-dataset_long-festivals_shared-consent” consists of a subset (n=161) of the original survey dataset (n=454), where respondents provided festival run data for films (n=206) and gave consent to share their data for research purposes. This dataset consists of the festival data in a long format, so that each row corresponds to the festival appearance of a film.
The csv file “2_survey-dataset_wide-no-festivals_shared-consent” consists of a subset (n=372) of the original dataset (n=454) of survey responses corresponding to sample films. It includes data only for those films for which respondents provided consent to share their data for research purposes. This dataset is shown in wide format of the survey data, i.e. information for each response corresponding to a film is listed in one row. This includes data on film IDs, film title, survey questions regarding completeness and availability of provided information, information on number of festival screenings, screening fees, budgets, marketing costs, market screenings, and distribution. As the file name suggests, no data on festival screenings is included in the wide format dataset.
3 IMDb & Scripts
The IMDb dataset consists of a data scheme image file, one codebook and eight datasets, all in csv format. It also includes the R scripts that we used for scraping and matching.
The codebook “3_codebook_imdb-dataset” includes information for all IMDb datasets. This includes ID information and their data source, coding and value ranges, and information on missing data.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_aka-titles_long” contains film title data in different languages scraped from IMDb in a long format, i.e. each row corresponds to a title in a given language.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_awards_long” contains film award data in a long format, i.e. each row corresponds to an award of a given film.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_companies_long” contains data on production and distribution companies of films. The dataset is in a long format, so that each row corresponds to a particular company of a particular film.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_crew_long” contains data on names and roles of crew members in a long format, i.e. each row corresponds to each crew member. The file also contains binary gender assigned to directors based on their first names using the GenderizeR application.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_festival-runs_long” contains festival run data scraped from IMDb in a long format, i.e. each row corresponds to the festival appearance of a given film. The dataset does not include each film screening, but the first screening of a film at a festival within a given year. The data includes festival runs up to 2019.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_general-info_wide” contains general information about films such as genre as defined by IMDb, languages in which a film was shown, ratings, and budget. The dataset is in wide format, so that each row corresponds to a unique film.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_release-info_long” contains data about non-festival release (e.g., theatrical, digital, tv, dvd/blueray). The dataset is in a long format, so that each row corresponds to a particular release of a particular film.
The csv file “3_imdb-dataset_websites_long” contains data on available websites (official websites, miscellaneous, photos, video clips). The dataset is in a long format, so that each row corresponds to a website of a particular film.
The dataset includes 8 text files containing the script for webscraping. They were written using the R-3.6.3 version for Windows.
The R script “r_1_unite_data” demonstrates the structure of the dataset, that we use in the following steps to identify, scrape, and match the film data.
The R script “r_2_scrape_matches” reads in the dataset with the film characteristics described in the “r_1_unite_data” and uses various R packages to create a search URL for each film from the core dataset on the IMDb website. The script attempts to match each film from the core dataset to IMDb records by first conducting an advanced search based on the movie title and year, and then potentially using an alternative title and a basic search if no matches are found in the advanced search. The script scrapes the title, release year, directors, running time, genre, and IMDb film URL from the first page of the suggested records from the IMDb website. The script then defines a loop that matches (including matching scores) each film in the core dataset with suggested films on the IMDb search page. Matching was done using data on directors, production year (+/- one year), and title, a fuzzy matching approach with two methods: “cosine” and “osa.” where the cosine similarity is used to match titles with a high degree of similarity, and the OSA algorithm is used to match titles that may have typos or minor variations.
The script “r_3_matching” creates a dataset with the matches for a manual check. Each pair of films (original film from the core dataset and the suggested match from the IMDb website was categorized in the following five categories: a) 100% match: perfect match on title, year, and director; b) likely good match; c) maybe match; d) unlikely match; and e) no match). The script also checks for possible doubles in the dataset and identifies them for a manual check.
The script “r_4_scraping_functions” creates a function for scraping the data from the identified matches (based on the scripts described above and manually checked). These functions are used for scraping the data in the next script.
The script “r_5a_extracting_info_sample” uses the function defined in the “r_4_scraping_functions”, in order to scrape the IMDb data for the identified matches. This script does that for the first 100 films, to check, if everything works. Scraping for the entire dataset took a few hours. Therefore, a test with a subsample of 100 films is advisable.
The script “r_5b_extracting_info_all” extracts the data for the entire dataset of the identified matches.
The script “r_5c_extracting_info_skipped” checks the films with missing data (where data was not scraped) and tried to extract data one more time to make sure that the errors were not caused by disruptions in the internet connection or other technical issues.
The script “r_check_logs” is used for troubleshooting and tracking the progress of all of the R scripts used. It gives information on the amount of missing values and errors.
4 Festival Library Dataset
The Festival Library Dataset consists of a data scheme image file, one codebook and one dataset, all in csv format.
The codebook (csv file “4_codebook_festival-library_dataset”) offers a detailed description of all variables within the Library Dataset. It lists the definition of variables, such as location and festival name, and festival categories, units of measurement, data sources and coding and missing data.
The csv file “4_festival-library_dataset_imdb-and-survey” contains data on all unique festivals collected from both IMDb and survey sources. This dataset appears in wide format, all information for each festival is listed in one row. This
This dataset contains all the data and code needed to reproduce the analyses in the manuscript: Penn, H. J., & Read, Q. D. (2023). Stem borer herbivory dependent on interactions of sugarcane variety, associated traits, and presence of prior borer damage. Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7843 Included are two .Rmd notebooks containing all code required to reproduce the analyses in the manuscript, two .html file of rendered notebook output, three .csv data files that are loaded and analyzed, and a .zip file of intermediate R objects that are generated during the model fitting and variable selection process. Notebook files 01_boring_analysis.Rmd: This RMarkdown notebook contains R code to read and process the raw data, create exploratory data visualizations and tables, fit a Bayesian generalized linear mixed model, extract output from the statistical model, and create graphs and tables summarizing the model output including marginal means for different varieties and contrasts between crop years. 02_trait_covariate_analysis.Rmd: This RMarkdown notebook contains R code to read raw variety-level trait data, perform feature selection based on correlations between traits, fit another generalized linear mixed model using traits as predictors, and create graphs and tables from that model output including marginal means by categorical trait and marginal trends by continuous trait. HTML files These HTML files contain the rendered output of the two RMarkdown notebooks. They were generated by Quentin Read on 2023-08-30 and 2023-08-15. 01_boring_analysis.html 02_trait_covariate_analysis.html CSV data files These files contain the raw data. To recreate the notebook output the CSV files should be at the file path project/data/ relative to where the notebook is run. Columns are described below. BoredInternodes_26April2022_no format.csv: primary data file with sugarcane borer (SCB) damage Columns A-C are the year, date, and location. All location values are the same. Column D identifies which experiment the data point was collected from. Column E, Stubble, indicates the crop year (plant cane or first stubble) Column F indicates the variety Column G indicates the plot (integer ID) Column H indicates the stalk within each plot (integer ID) Column I, # Internodes, indicates how many internodes were on the stalk Columns J-AM are numbered 1-30 and indicate whether SCB damage was observed on that internode (0 if no, 1 if yes, blank cell if that internode was not present on the stalk) Column AN indicates the experimental treatment for those rows that are part of a manipulative experiment Column AO contains notes variety_lookup.csv: summary information for the 16 varieties analyzed in this study Column A is the variety name Column B is the total number of stalks assessed for SCB damage for that variety across all years Column C is the number of years that variety is present in the data Column D, Stubble, indicates which crop years were sampled for that variety ("PC" if only plant cane, "PC, 1S" if there are data for both plant cane and first stubble crop years) Column E, SCB resistance, is a categorical designation with four values: susceptible, moderately susceptible, moderately resistant, resistant Column F is the literature reference for the SCB resistance value Select_variety_traits_12Dec2022.csv: variety-level traits for the 16 varieties analyzed in this study Column A is the variety name Column B is the SCB resistance designation as an integer Column C is the categorical SCB resistance designation (see above) Columns D-I are continuous traits from year 1 (plant cane), including sugar (Mg/ha), biomass or aboveground cane production (Mg/ha), TRS or theoretically recoverable sugar (g/kg), stalk weight of individual stalks (kg), stalk population density (stalks/ha), and fiber content of stalk (percent). Columns J-O are the same continuous traits from year 2 (first stubble) Columns P-V are categorical traits (in some cases continuous traits binned into categories): maturity timing, amount of stalk wax, amount of leaf sheath wax, amount of leaf sheath hair, tightness of leaf sheath, whether leaf sheath becomes necrotic with age, and amount of collar hair. ZIP file of intermediate R objects To recreate the notebook output without having to run computationally intensive steps, unzip the archive. The fitted model objects should be at the file path project/ relative to where the notebook is run. intermediate_R_objects.zip: This file contains intermediate R objects that are generated during the model fitting and variable selection process. You may use the R objects in the .zip file if you would like to reproduce final output including figures and tables without having to refit the computationally intensive statistical models. binom_fit_intxns_updated_only5yrs.rds: fitted brms model object for the main statistical model binom_fit_reduced.rds: fitted brms model object for the trait covariate analysis marginal_trends.RData: calculated values of the estimated marginal trends with respect to year and previous damage marginal_trend_trs.rds: calculated values of the estimated marginal trend with respect to TRS marginal_trend_fib.rds: calculated values of the estimated marginal trend with respect to fiber content Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Sugarcane borer damage data by internode, 1993-2021. File Name: BoredInternodes_26April2022_no format.csvResource Title: Summary information for the 16 sugarcane varieties analyzed. File Name: variety_lookup.csvResource Title: Variety-level traits for the 16 sugarcane varieties analyzed. File Name: Select_variety_traits_12Dec2022.csvResource Title: RMarkdown notebook 2: trait covariate analysis. File Name: 02_trait_covariate_analysis.RmdResource Title: Rendered HTML output of notebook 2. File Name: 02_trait_covariate_analysis.htmlResource Title: RMarkdown notebook 1: main analysis. File Name: 01_boring_analysis.RmdResource Title: Rendered HTML output of notebook 1. File Name: 01_boring_analysis.htmlResource Title: Intermediate R objects. File Name: intermediate_R_objects.zip
Data presented here are those collected from a survey of Ecology professors at 48 undergraduate institutions to assess the current state of data management education. The following files have been uploaded:
Scripts(2): 1. DataCleaning_20120105.R is an R script for cleaning up data prior to analysis. This script removes spaces, substitutes text for codes, removed duplicate schools, and converts questions and answers from the survey into more simple parameter names, without any numbers, spaces, or symbols. This script is heavily annotated to assist the user of the file in understanding what is being done to the data files. The script produces the file cleandata_[date].Rdata, which is called in the file DataTrimming_20120105.R 2. DataTrimming_20120105.R is an R script for trimming extraneous variables not used in final analyses. Some variables are combined as needed and NAs (no answers) are removed. The file is heavily annotated. It produces trimdata_[date].Rdata, which was imported into Excel for summary statistics.
Data files (3) 3. AdvancedSpreadsheet_20110526.csv is the output file from the SurveyMonkey online survey tool used for this project. It is a .csv sheet with the complete set of survey data, although some data (e.g., open-ended responses, institution names) are removed to prevent schools and/or instructors from being identifiable. This file is read into DataCleaning_20120105.R for cleaning and editing. 4. VariableRenaming_20110711.csv is called into the DataCleaning_20120105.R script to convert the questions and answers from the survey into simple parameter names, without any numbers, spaces, or symbols. 5. ParamTable.csv is a list of the parameter names used for analysis and the value codes. It can be used to understand outputs from the scripts above (cleandata_[date].Rdata and trimdata_[date].Rdata).
Dataset1.zip
Samples were stored unfiltered in the dark at 4° C for approximately five months after sampling.
On the day of measurements, specific volumes of samples were transferred to 2 mL Eppendorf vials so that 11.25 µg carbon was present in each sample vial, while 2 mL of blanks were transferred.
The water in samples and blanks was subsequently removed by vacuum evaporation at 45° C, after which samples were reconstituted in 150 µL 1 % (v/v) formic acid to a final concentration of 75 mg/L carbon.
Reverse-phase chromatography separations were performed on an Agilent 1100 series instrument with an Agilent PLRP‑S series column (150 x 1 mm, 3 µm bed size, 100 Å pore size). Eighty µL sample was loaded at a flow rate of 100 µL min-1 0.1 % formic acid, 0.05 % ammonia, and 5 % acetonitrile. The elution of DOM was achieved through a step-wise increase in concentrat...
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The raw data file is available online for public access (https://data.ontario.ca/dataset/lake-simcoe-monitoring). Download the 1980-2019 csv files and open up the file named "Simcoe_Zooplankton&Bythotrephes.csv". Copy and paste the zooplankton sheet into a new excel file called "Simcoe_Zooplankton.csv". The column ZDATE in the excel file needs to be switched from GENERAL to SHORT DATE so that the dates in the ZDATE column read "YYYY/MM/DD". Save as .csv in appropriate R folder. The data file "simcoe_manual_subset_weeks_5" is the raw data that has been subset for the main analysis of the article using the .R file "Simcoe MS - 5 Station Subset Data". The .csv file produced from this must then be manually edited to remove data points that do not have 5 stations per sampling period as well as by combining data points that should fall into a single week. The "simcoe_manual_subset_weeks_5.csv" is then used for the calculation of variability, stabilization, asynchrony, and Shannon Diversity for each year in the .R file "Simcoe MS - 5 Station Calculations". The final .R file "Simcoe MS - 5 Station Analysis contains the final statistical analyses as well as code to reproduce the original figures. Data and code for main and supplementary analyses are also available on GitHub (https://github.com/reillyoc/ZPseasonalPEs).
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The purpose of this dataset is to provide a detailed picture of the characteristics of Syrian towns in the years preceding the 2011 Syrian uprising and ensuing civil war. It incorporates the 2004 national census, the last before the uprising, and a newly collected set of data on ethnic identity. The level of analysis is the town (the Syrian Census Bureau’s fourth administrative level). TECHNICAL NOTE: The .csv files in this data package contain both Arabic and English, so are encoded in UTF-8. The Arabic script should render if opened directly in Open Office, Numbers, Google Drive, or R statistical software. To read the Arabic in Excel, you can open the .csv file in any of these applications and save it as an .xlsx file, or open it through Excel using the following steps: (1) open a blank excel document (2) import the data using “Data -> Get External Data -> Import text file” (3) select “File Origin: Unicode (UTF-8)” (4) select “Delimiters: comma” (5) select the top left cell to place the data See the following post for further details: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6002256/is-it-possible-to-force-excel-recognize-utf-8-csv-files-automatically
[Note 2023-08-14 - Supersedes version 1, https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1528086 ] This dataset contains all code and data necessary to reproduce the analyses in the manuscript: Mengistu, A., Read, Q. D., Sykes, V. R., Kelly, H. M., Kharel, T., & Bellaloui, N. (2023). Cover crop and crop rotation effects on tissue and soil population dynamics of Macrophomina phaseolina and yield under no-till system. Plant Disease. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-03-23-0443-re The .zip archive cropping-systems-1.0.zip contains data and code files. Data stem_soil_CFU_by_plant.csv: Soil disease load (SoilCFUg) and stem tissue disease load (StemCFUg) for individual plants in CFU per gram, with columns indicating year, plot ID, replicate, row, plant ID, previous crop treatment, cover crop treatment, and comments. Missing data are indicated with . yield_CFU_by_plot.csv: Yield data (YldKgHa) at the plot level in units of kg/ha, with columns indicating year, plot ID, replicate, and treatments, as well as means of soil and stem disease load at the plot level. Code cropping_system_analysis_v3.0.Rmd: RMarkdown notebook with all data processing, analysis, and visualization code equations.Rmd: RMarkdown notebook with formatted equations formatted_figs_revision.R: R script to produce figures formatted exactly as they appear in the manuscript The Rproject file cropping-systems.Rproj is used to organize the RStudio project. Scripts and notebooks used in older versions of the analysis are found in the testing/ subdirectory. Excel spreadsheets containing raw data from which the cleaned CSV files were created are found in the raw_data subdirectory.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-standalone.htmlhttps://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-standalone.html
Replication pack, FSE2018 submission #164: ------------------------------------------
**Working title:** Ecosystem-Level Factors Affecting the Survival of Open-Source Projects: A Case Study of the PyPI Ecosystem **Note:** link to data artifacts is already included in the paper. Link to the code will be included in the Camera Ready version as well. Content description =================== - **ghd-0.1.0.zip** - the code archive. This code produces the dataset files described below - **settings.py** - settings template for the code archive. - **dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip** - the minimally sufficient version of the dataset. This dataset only includes stats aggregated by the ecosystem (PyPI) - **dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz** - full version of the dataset, including project-level statistics. It is ~34Gb unpacked. This dataset still doesn't include PyPI packages themselves, which take around 2TB. - **build_model.r, helpers.r** - R files to process the survival data (`survival_data.csv` in **dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip**, `common.cache/survival_data.pypi_2008_2017-12_6.csv` in **dataset_full_Jan_2018.tgz**) - **Interview protocol.pdf** - approximate protocol used for semistructured interviews. - LICENSE - text of GPL v3, under which this dataset is published - INSTALL.md - replication guide (~2 pages)
Replication guide ================= Step 0 - prerequisites ---------------------- - Unix-compatible OS (Linux or OS X) - Python interpreter (2.7 was used; Python 3 compatibility is highly likely) - R 3.4 or higher (3.4.4 was used, 3.2 is known to be incompatible) Depending on detalization level (see Step 2 for more details): - up to 2Tb of disk space (see Step 2 detalization levels) - at least 16Gb of RAM (64 preferable) - few hours to few month of processing time Step 1 - software ---------------- - unpack **ghd-0.1.0.zip**, or clone from gitlab: git clone https://gitlab.com/user2589/ghd.git git checkout 0.1.0 `cd` into the extracted folder. All commands below assume it as a current directory. - copy `settings.py` into the extracted folder. Edit the file: * set `DATASET_PATH` to some newly created folder path * add at least one GitHub API token to `SCRAPER_GITHUB_API_TOKENS` - install docker. For Ubuntu Linux, the command is `sudo apt-get install docker-compose` - install libarchive and headers: `sudo apt-get install libarchive-dev` - (optional) to replicate on NPM, install yajl: `sudo apt-get install yajl-tools` Without this dependency, you might get an error on the next step, but it's safe to ignore. - install Python libraries: `pip install --user -r requirements.txt` . - disable all APIs except GitHub (Bitbucket and Gitlab support were not yet implemented when this study was in progress): edit `scraper/init.py`, comment out everything except GitHub support in `PROVIDERS`. Step 2 - obtaining the dataset ----------------------------- The ultimate goal of this step is to get output of the Python function `common.utils.survival_data()` and save it into a CSV file: # copy and paste into a Python console from common import utils survival_data = utils.survival_data('pypi', '2008', smoothing=6) survival_data.to_csv('survival_data.csv') Since full replication will take several months, here are some ways to speedup the process: ####Option 2.a, difficulty level: easiest Just use the precomputed data. Step 1 is not necessary under this scenario. - extract **dataset_minimal_Jan_2018.zip** - get `survival_data.csv`, go to the next step ####Option 2.b, difficulty level: easy Use precomputed longitudinal feature values to build the final table. The whole process will take 15..30 minutes. - create a folder `