In 2024, the state of Louisiana recorded the wettest precipitation anomaly across the contiguous United States, with around **** inches of precipitation above the ********* annual average. Ranking second was the state of Rhode Island, where rainfall was more than **** inches above the average. That same year, the annual precipitation anomaly across the U.S. amounted to some **** inches.

In 2024, Louisiana recorded ***** inches of precipitation. This was the highest precipitation within the 48 contiguous U.S. states that year. On the other hand, Nevada was the driest state, with only **** inches of precipitation recorded. Precipitation across the United States Not only did Louisiana record the largest precipitation volume in 2024, but it also registered the highest precipitation anomaly that year, around 14.36 inches above the 1901-2000 annual average. In fact, over the last decade, rainfall across the United States was generally higher than the average recorded for the 20th century. Meanwhile, the driest states were located in the country's southwestern region, an area which – according to experts – will become even drier and warmer in the future. How does global warming affect precipitation patterns? Rising temperatures on Earth lead to increased evaporation which – ultimately – results in more precipitation. Since 1900, the volume of precipitation in the United States has increased at an average rate of **** inches per decade. Nevertheless, the effects of climate change on precipitation can vary depending on the location. For instance, climate change can alter wind patterns and ocean currents, causing certain areas to experience reduced precipitation. Furthermore, even if precipitation increases, it does not necessarily increase the water availability for human consumption, which might eventually lead to drought conditions.

In 2023, the southern state of Tabasco recorded the highest amount of precipitation across Mexico, with a total of over ***** millimeters of rainfall. Ranking second was Chiapas – also in the south of Mexico – where rainfall reached approximately ***** millimeters that year. On the other side of the spectrum, the state of Baja California was the driest, with less than *** millimeters of precipitation registered throughout 2023.

Abstract:Rain on Snow is a statewide coverage of rain-on-snow zones. Rain-on-snow zones are based on average amounts of snow on the ground in early January, relative to the amount of snow that could reasonably be melted during a model storm event. Five Rain on Snow zones are defined in Washington State and are based on climate, elevation, latitude, and vegetation. Rain on Snow was digitized from 1:250,000 USGS quads.Purpose:The Rain-on-snow coverage was created as a screening tool to identify forest practice applications that may be in a significant rain-on-snow zone (WAC 222-22-100).Description:Five ROS zones are defined in Washington State and are based on climate, elevation, latitude, and vegetation. Rain on snow is a process that exhibits spatial and temporal variation under natural conditions, with the effects of vegetation on snow accumulation and melt adding additional complications in prediction. There is no map that shows the magnitude and frequency of water inputs to be expected from rain on snow events, so we have attempted to create an index map based on what we know about the process controls and their effects in the various climatic zones. If we assume that, averaged over many years, the seasonal storm tracks that bring warm, wet cyclonic storms to the Northwest have access to all parts of Washington , then the main factors controlling and/or reflecting the occurrence and magnitude of a R/S event in any particular place are:1) Climatic region: especially the differences between windward and leeward sides of major mountain ranges, which control seasonal climatic patterns;2) Elevation: controls temperature, thus the likelihood and amount of snow on the ground, and affects orographic enhancement of storm precipitation; 3) Latitude: affects temperature, thus snow;4) Aspect: affects insolation and temperature (especially in winter), thus melting of snow; 5) Vegetation: the species composing forest communities can reflect the climate of an area (tolerance of warmth or cold, wet or dry conditions, deep and/or long lived snowpacks); the height and density of vegetation also partly controls the amount of snow on the ground. As natural vegetation integrates the effects of all of these controls, we tried to find or adapt floral indicators of the various zones of water input. We designed the precipitation zones to reflect the amount of snow likely to be on the ground at the beginning of a storm. We assumed that some middle elevation area would experience the greatest water input due to Rain on Snow, because the amount of snow available would be likely to be approximately the amount that could be melted. Higher and lower elevation zones would bear diminished effects, but for opposite reasons (no snow to melt, vs too cold to melt much). These considerations suggested a three or five zone system. We chose to designate five zones because a larger number of classes reduces the importance of the dividing lines, and thus of the inherent uncertainties of those lines. The average snow water equivalents (SWE) for the early January measurements at about 100 snow courses and snow pillows were compiled; snow depths for the first week in January at about 85 weather stations were converted into SWE. For each region (western North Cascades, Blue Mountains, etc.), the snow amounts were sorted by station elevation to derive a rough indicator of the relationship between snow accumulation and elevation. (Sub regional differences in snow accumulation patterns were also recognized.) After trying various combinations of ratios for areas where the snow hydrology is relatively well known, we adopted the following designations: 5. Highlands: >4 5 times ideal SWE; high elevation, with little likelihood of significant water input to the ground during storms (precipitation likely to be snow, and liquid water probably refreezes in a deep snow pack); effects of harvest on snow accumulation are minor; 4. Snow dominated zone: from "1.25 1.5 ideal SWE, up to "4; melt occurs during R/S (especially during early season storms), but effects can be mitigated by the lag time of percolation through the snowpack; 3. Peak rain on snow zone: "0.5 0.75 up to "1.25 ideal SWE; middle elevations: shallow snow packs are common in winter, so likelihood and effects of R/S in heavy rainstorms are greatest; typically more snow accumulation in clearings than in forest; 2. Rain dominated zone: "0.1 0.5 ideal SWE; areas at lower elevations, where rain occasionally falls on small amounts of snow; 1. Lowlands: <0.1 ideal SWE; coastal, low elevation, and rain shadow areas; lower rainfall intensities, and significant snow depths are rare. Precipitation zones were mapped on mylar overlays on 1:250,000 scale topographic maps. Because snow depth is affected by many factors, the correlation between snow and elevation is crude, and it was not possible to simply pick out contour markers for the boundaries. Ranges of elevations were chosen for each region, but allowance was made for the effects of sub regional climates, aspect, vegetative indicators of snow depth, etc. Thus, a particular boundary would be mapped somewhat lower on the north side of a ridge or in a cool valley (e.g. below a glacier), reflecting greater snow accumulations in such places. The same boundary would be mapped higher on the south side of the ridge, where inter-storm sunshine could reduce snow accumulation. Conditions at the weather stations and snow courses were used to check the mapping; but in areas where measurements are scarce, interpolation had to be performed. The boundaries of the precipitation zones were entered in the DNR's GIS. Because of the small scale of the original mapping and the imprecision of the digitizing process, some errors were introduced. It should not be expected that GIS images can be projected to large scales to define knife edge zone boundaries (which don't exist, anyway), but they are good enough to locate areas tens of acres in size. Some apparent anomalies in the map require explanation. Much of western Washington is mapped in the lowland or highland zones. This does not mean that R/S does not occur in those areas; it does, but on average with less frequency and hydrologic significance than in the middle three zones. Most of central and eastern Washington is mapped in the rain dominated zone, despite meager precipitation there; this means only that the amount of snow likely to be on the ground is small, and storm water inputs are composed dominantly of the rain itself, without much contribution from snow melt. Much of northeastern Washington is mapped in the peak Rain Snow zone, despite the fact that such events are less common there than in western Washington. This is due to the fact that there is less increase in snow depth with elevation (i.e. the snow wedge is less steep), so a wider elevation band has appropriate snow amounts; plus, much of that region lies within that elevation band where the 'ideal' amount of snow is liable to be on the ground when a model Rain Snow event occurs. This does not reflect the lower frequency of such storms in that area.

Hourly Precipitation Data (HPD) is digital data set DSI-3240, archived at the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). The primary source of data for this file is approximately 5,500 US National Weather Service (NWS), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and cooperative observer stations in the United States of America, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, and various Pacific Islands. The earliest data dates vary considerably by state and region: Maine, Pennsylvania, and Texas have data since 1900. The western Pacific region that includes Guam, American Samoa, Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau have data since 1978. Other states and regions have earliest dates between those extremes. The latest data in all states and regions is from the present day. The major parameter in DSI-3240 is precipitation amounts, which are measurements of hourly or daily precipitation accumulation. Accumulation was for longer periods of time if for any reason the rain gauge was out of service or no observer was present. DSI 3240_01 contains data grouped by state; DSI 3240_02 contains data grouped by year.

This data release contains daily gridded data reflecting surface water input from rainfall, rain on snow (mixed), and snowmelt for the conterminous United States for water years 1990 to 2023 (1990/10/01 to 2023/09/30). This release also contains annual estimates of gridded input seasonality (an index reflecting whether surface water input occurs within a concentrated period or is equally distributed throughout the year), precipitation seasonality, average snowmelt, rainfall and rain on snow rates, and finally, annual totals of each input type. Average snowmelt, rainfall and rain on snow rates were computed using days where values were greater than zero. Daily data were generated using precipitation input from the gridMET dataset (Abatzoglou, 2013) and the University of Arizona snow water equivalent product (Broxton et al., 2019). Abatzoglou, J. T. (2013), Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. Int. J. Climatol., 33: 121–131. Broxton, P., X. Zeng, and N. Dawson. (2019). Daily 4 km Gridded SWE and Snow Depth from Assimilated In-Situ and Modeled Data over the Conterminous US, Version 1. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. https://doi.org/10.5067/0GGPB220EX6A.

The Dataset contains year wise actual annual rainfall across the meteorological sub divisions in India. The information is collated from RBI's Handbook of Statistics on States and is based on the information received from Indian Meteorological Department.

In 2024, the United States saw some **** inches of precipitation. The main forms of precipitation include hail, drizzle, rain, sleet, and snow. Since the turn of the century, 2012 was the driest year on record with an annual precipitation of **** inches. Regional disparities in rainfall Louisiana emerged as the wettest state in the U.S. in 2024, recording a staggering ***** inches (*** meters) of precipitation—nearly **** inches (ca. ** centimeters) above its historical average. In stark contrast, Nevada received only **** inches (ca. ** centimeters), underscoring the vast differences in rainfall across the nation. These extremes illustrate the uneven distribution of precipitation, with the southwestern states experiencing increasingly dry conditions that experts predict will worsen in the coming years. Drought concerns persist Drought remains a significant concern in many parts of the country. The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) for the contiguous United States stood at ***** in December 2024, indicating moderate to severe drought conditions. This reading follows three years of generally negative PDSI values, with the most extreme drought recorded in December 2023 at *****.

United States Maximum 5-day Rainfall: 25-year Return Level data was reported at 9.986 mm in 2050. United States Maximum 5-day Rainfall: 25-year Return Level data is updated yearly, averaging 9.986 mm from Dec 2050 (Median) to 2050, with 1 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.986 mm in 2050 and a record low of 9.986 mm in 2050. United States Maximum 5-day Rainfall: 25-year Return Level data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Environmental: Climate Risk. A 25-year return level of the 5-day cumulative precipitation is the maximum precipitation sum over any 5-day period that can be expected once in an average 25-year period.;World Bank, Climate Change Knowledge Portal (https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org);;

This dataset measures annual and seasonal rainfall at 30 sites across Aotearoa New Zealand from 1960 to 2022. We also provide data for annual and seasonal anomalies (difference from baseline) for each site from 1960 to 2022.

Variables: site: NIWA climate site. season: Season or Annual data (combined for ease of data use) precipitation: Rainfall in mm period_start: Start date of season or year period_end: End date of season or year pretty_site_name: pretty site name lat: Approximate latitude location of NIWA climate stations to represent a site. lon: Approximate longitude location of NIWA climate stations to represent a site. anom_1961: Anomaly against baseline 1961-1990 anom_1991: Anomaly against baseline 1991-2020 site_simple: pretty_site_name without macrons

[Metadata] Mean Annual Rainfall Isohyets in Millimeters for the Islands of Hawai‘i, Kaho‘olawe, Kaua‘i, Lāna‘i, Maui, Moloka‘i and O‘ahu. Source: 2011 Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii, https://www.hawaii.edu/climate-data-portal/rainfall-atlas. Note that Moloka‘I data/maps were updated in 2014. Please see Rainfall Atlas final report appendix for full method details: https://www.hawaii.edu/climate-data-portal/rainfall-atlas. Statewide GIS program staff downloaded data from UH Geography Department, Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii, February, 2019. Annual and monthly isohyets of mean rainfall were available for download. The statewide GIS program makes available only the annual layer. Both the monthly layers and the original annual layer are available from the Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii website, referenced above. Note: Contour attribute value represents the amount of annual rainfall, in millimeters, for that line/isohyet. For additional information, please see metadata at https://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/gis/data/isohyets.pdf or contact Hawaii Statewide GIS Program, Office of Planning and Sustainable Development, State of Hawaii; PO Box 2359, Honolulu, Hi. 96804; (808) 587-2846; email: gis@hawaii.gov; Website: https://planning.hawaii.gov/gis.

This metadata record describes the average daily precipitation intensity for rain events during the 30-year period 1981 – 2010 for the conterminous United States. A rain event is defined as a period when the number of consecutive days with precipitation equals or exceeds 1 millimeter. Daily precipitation intensity is defined as the amount of precipitation over the duration of a rain event divided by the number of days in a rain event. The source data was produced and acquired from DAYMET (2018) and is presented here as a 1-kilometer resolution GeoTIFF file.

The Climate Science Initiative (CSI) State rainfall projection 20km bias corrected dataset has been produced as part of the Climate Science Initiative program. Climate projection data is available at a 20-kilometre resolution representing the monthly average of precipitation (mm/day) daily average rainfall for annual and seasonal time slices (Summer, Autumn, Winter, Spring) over the 5 time periods: • Baseline (1990-2009) • 2030 (2020-2039) • 2050 (2040-2059) • 2070 (2060-2079) • 2090 (2080-2099) Projections represent two emissions scenarios, SSP1-2.6 (a ‘low’ emissions scenario) and SSP3-7.0 (a ‘high’ emissions scenario). The results are presented as a mean, minimum and maximum result of the NSW and Australian Regional Climate Modelling (NARCliM) ensemble (representing 10 Global Climate Model results) for each gridded point, as well as a standard deviation to reveal the statistical range between model results. Relative change files (difference between the future and baseline prediction) are also available for each of the calculations i.e. annual and seasonal mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum. The data is bias corrected, and users are encouraged to read the CSI technical fact sheet for further information on this, and data limitations. It also includes background information on the project and datasets, explanations of technical terms such as Global Climate Models (GCMs), Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) and further information about the projections. It also contains important advice regarding using the data appropriately. Future updates to this dataset may include regional and global climate model specific data at a 4-kilometre resolution, as well as a third ‘middle of the road’ scenario (SSP2-4.5). The data naming protocol is outlined in the technical information factsheet available under Data and Resources. • Frequently asked questions - https://www.wa.gov.au/service/environment/environment-information-services/climate-science-initiative-frequently-asked-questions • Climate Science Initiative - https://www.wa.gov.au/organisation/department-of-water-and-environmental-regulation/climate-science-initiative

Abstract: The mapping of rainfall is fundamental in the hydrological modeling process. In this sense, the importance of knowing the geographic and seasonal dynamics of average estimates of rainfall and associated uncertainties is evident. Thus, the present study aimed to predict the spatial and seasonal distribution of rainfall, with the estimation of related uncertainties, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS). Average rainfall varies over the months of the year. In January, February, June, July, August, and September it rains more north and northeast. In March, April, May, October, November, and December it rains more northwest and north. In general, it rains a lot in October and little rain in August. From a geographical point of view, it is possible to highlight that greater volumes of rain occur in the northern part of the state of RS. The uncertainties associated with rainfall estimates show divergent temporal dynamics, with the greatest uncertainties tending to occur in January, February, September, and October and that the smallest uncertainties are observed in June, July, and August.

Temperature and rainfall data for St. John USVI. access_formats=.htmlTable,.csv,.json,.mat,.nc,.tsv acquisition_description=Based on Tsounis and Edmunds (In press), Ecosphere:\u00a0

Physical environmental conditions were characterized using three features that are well-known to affect coral reef community dynamics (described in Glynn 1993, Rogers 1993, Fabricius et al. 2005): seawater temperature, rainfall, and hurricane intensity. Together, these were used to generate seven dependent variables describing physical environmental features. Seawater temperature was recorded at each site every 15-30 min using a variety of logging sensors (see Edmunds 2006 for detailed information on the temperature measurement regime). Seawater temperature was characterized using five dependent variables calculated for each calendar year: mean temperature, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature (all averaged by day and month for each year), as well as the number of days hotter than 29.3 deg C (\u201chot days\u201d), and the number of days with temperatures greater than or equal to 26.0 deg C (\u201ccold days\u201d). The temperature defining "hot days" was determined by the coral bleaching threshold for St. John ("%5C%22http://www.coral.noaa.gov/research/climate-change/coral-%0Ableaching.html%5C%22">http://www.coral.noaa.gov/research/climate-change/coral- bleaching.html), and the temperature defining "cold days" was taken as 26.0 deg C which marks the lower 12th percentile of all daily temperatures between 1989 and 2005 (Edmunds, 2006). The upper temperature limit was defined by the local bleaching threshold, and the lower limit defined the 12th\u00a0percentile of local seawater temperature records (see Edmunds 2006 for details). Rainfall was measured at various locations around St. John (see\u00a0http://www.sercc.com) but often on the north shore (courtesy of R.\u00a0Boulon) (see Edmunds and Gray 2014). To assess the influence of hurricanes, a categorical index of local hurricane impact was employed, with the index based on qualitative estimates of wave impacts in Great Lameshur Bay as a function of wind speed, wind direction, and distance of the nearest approach of each hurricane to the study area (see Gross and Edmunds 2015). Index values of 0 were assigned to years with no hurricanes, 0.5 to hurricanes with low impacts, and 1 for hurricanes with high impacts, and years were characterized by the sum of their hurricane index values. awards_0_award_nid=55191 awards_0_award_number=DEB-0841441 awards_0_data_url=http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=0841441&HistoricalAwards=false awards_0_funder_name=National Science Foundation awards_0_funding_acronym=NSF awards_0_funding_source_nid=350 awards_0_program_manager=Saran Twombly awards_0_program_manager_nid=51702 awards_1_award_nid=562085 awards_1_award_number=OCE-1332915 awards_1_data_url=http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward.do?AwardNumber=1332915 awards_1_funder_name=NSF Division of Ocean Sciences awards_1_funding_acronym=NSF OCE awards_1_funding_source_nid=355 awards_1_program_manager=David L. Garrison awards_1_program_manager_nid=50534 awards_2_award_nid=562593 awards_2_award_number=DEB-1350146 awards_2_data_url=http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1350146 awards_2_funder_name=NSF Division of Environmental Biology awards_2_funding_acronym=NSF DEB awards_2_funding_source_nid=550432 awards_2_program_manager=Betsy Von Holle awards_2_program_manager_nid=701685 cdm_data_type=Other comment=Physical Data G. Tsounis and P. Edmunds, PIs Version 10 November 2016 Conventions=COARDS, CF-1.6, ACDD-1.3 data_source=extract_data_as_tsv version 2.3 19 Dec 2019 defaultDataQuery=&time<now doi=10.1575/1912/bco-dmo.664755 infoUrl=https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/664254 institution=BCO-DMO instruments_0_acronym=PrecipGauge instruments_0_dataset_instrument_description=Measured rainfall instruments_0_dataset_instrument_nid=664662 instruments_0_description=measures rain or snow precipitation instruments_0_instrument_external_identifier=https://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/L05/current/381/ instruments_0_instrument_name=Precipitation Gauge instruments_0_instrument_nid=671 instruments_0_supplied_name=Precipitation gauge instruments_1_dataset_instrument_description=Measured seawater temperature instruments_1_dataset_instrument_nid=664661 instruments_1_description=Records temperature data over a period of time. instruments_1_instrument_name=Temperature Logger instruments_1_instrument_nid=639396 instruments_1_supplied_name=Temperature logger metadata_source=https://www.bco-dmo.org/api/dataset/664254 param_mapping={'664254': {}} parameter_source=https://www.bco-dmo.org/mapserver/dataset/664254/parameters people_0_affiliation=California State University Northridge people_0_affiliation_acronym=CSU-Northridge people_0_person_name=Peter J. Edmunds people_0_person_nid=51536 people_0_role=Principal Investigator people_0_role_type=originator people_1_affiliation=California State University Northridge people_1_affiliation_acronym=CSU-Northridge people_1_person_name=Dr Georgios Tsounis people_1_person_nid=565353 people_1_role=Co-Principal Investigator people_1_role_type=originator people_2_affiliation=Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution people_2_affiliation_acronym=WHOI BCO-DMO people_2_person_name=Hannah Ake people_2_person_nid=650173 people_2_role=BCO-DMO Data Manager people_2_role_type=related project=St. John LTREB,VI Octocorals projects_0_acronym=St. John LTREB projects_0_description=Long Term Research in Environmental Biology (LTREB) in US Virgin Islands: From the NSF award abstract: In an era of growing human pressures on natural resources, there is a critical need to understand how major ecosystems will respond, the extent to which resource management can lessen the implications of these responses, and the likely state of these ecosystems in the future. Time-series analyses of community structure provide a vital tool in meeting these needs and promise a profound understanding of community change. This study focuses on coral reef ecosystems; an existing time-series analysis of the coral community structure on the reefs of St. John, US Virgin Islands, will be expanded to 27 years of continuous data in annual increments. Expansion of the core time-series data will be used to address five questions: (1) To what extent is the ecology at a small spatial scale (1-2 km) representative of regional scale events (10's of km)? (2) What are the effects of declining coral cover in modifying the genetic population structure of the coral host and its algal symbionts? (3) What are the roles of pre- versus post-settlement events in determining the population dynamics of small corals? (4) What role do physical forcing agents (other than temperature) play in driving the population dynamics of juvenile corals? and (5) How are populations of other, non-coral invertebrates responding to decadal-scale declines in coral cover? Ecological methods identical to those used over the last two decades will be supplemented by molecular genetic tools to understand the extent to which declining coral cover is affecting the genetic diversity of the corals remaining. An information management program will be implemented to create broad access by the scientific community to the entire data set. The importance of this study lies in the extreme longevity of the data describing coral reefs in a unique ecological context, and the immense potential that these data possess for understanding both the patterns of comprehensive community change (i.e., involving corals, other invertebrates, and genetic diversity), and the processes driving them. Importantly, as this project is closely integrated with resource management within the VI National Park, as well as larger efforts to study coral reefs in the US through the NSF Moorea Coral Reef LTER, it has a strong potential to have scientific and management implications that extend further than the location of the study. The following publications and data resulted from this project: 2015 Edmunds PJ, Tsounis G, Lasker HR (2015) Differential distribution of octocorals and scleractinians around St. John and St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands. Hydrobiologia. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2555-zoctocoral - sp. abundance and distributionDownload complete data for this publication (Excel file) 2015 Lenz EA, Bramanti L, Lasker HR, Edmunds PJ. Long-term variation of octocoral populations in St. John, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs DOI 10.1007/s00338-015-1315-xoctocoral survey - densitiesoctocoral counts - photoquadrats vs. insitu surveyoctocoral literature reviewDownload complete data for this publication (Excel file) 2015 Privitera-Johnson, K., et al., Density-associated recruitment in octocoral communities in St. John, US Virgin Islands, J.Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. DOI 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.08.006octocoral recruitmentDownload complete data for this publication (Excel file) 2014 Edmunds PJ. Landscape-scale variation in coral reef community structure in the United States Virgin Islands. Marine Ecology Progress Series 509: 137–152. DOI 10.3354/meps10891. Data at MCR-VINP. Download complete data for this publication (Excel file) 2014 Edmunds PJ, Nozawa Y, Villanueva RD. Refuges modulate coral recruitment in the Caribbean and Pacific. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 454: 78-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.02.00 Data at MCR-VINP.Download complete data for this publication (Excel file) 2014 Edmunds PJ, Gray SC. The effects of storms, heavy rain, and sedimentation on the shallow coral reefs of St. John, US Virgin Islands. Hydrobiologia 734(1):143-148. Data at MCR-VINP.Download complete data for this publication (Excel file) 2014 Levitan, D, Edmunds PJ, Levitan K. What makes a species common? No evidence of density-dependent recruitment or mortality of the sea urchin Diadema antillarum after the 1983-1984 mass mortality. Oecologia. DOI

Rainfall: Uttarakahand: Normal data was reported at 15.100 mm in 27 Jul 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 16.100 mm for 26 Jul 2018. Rainfall: Uttarakahand: Normal data is updated daily, averaging 9.400 mm from May 2018 (Median) to 27 Jul 2018, with 56 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 17.400 mm in 25 Jul 2018 and a record low of 2.400 mm in 02 Jun 2018. Rainfall: Uttarakahand: Normal data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by India Meteorological Department. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Agriculture Sector – Table IN.RIS004: Rainfall: by States.

This statistic shows the ten major U.S. cities with the most rainy days per year between 1981 and 2010. Rochester, New York, had an average of about 167 days per year with precipitation. The sunniest city in the U.S. was Phoenix, Arizona, with an average of 85 percent of sunshine per day.

Daily Projected Rainfall (CCSM3A1B) for 2014-2020 by State in Peninsular Malaysia. Data has been produced by NAHRIM, downscaled for State in Peninsular Malaysia based on The Forth Assessment Report (AR4) of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Disclaimer: Data/information provided must be checked thoroughly prior to its usage. Any usage of this/these data must be credited to NAHRIM. We will not be responsible for any loss/damage due to usage or manipulation of this/these data without our consultation. No. of Views : 225

Rainfall: Assam: Normal data was reported at 0.400 mm in 02 Dec 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.400 mm for 01 Dec 2025. Rainfall: Assam: Normal data is updated daily, averaging 1.200 mm from May 2018 (Median) to 02 Dec 2025, with 2701 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 139.500 mm in 13 Apr 2021 and a record low of 0.000 mm in 08 Dec 2024. Rainfall: Assam: Normal data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by India Meteorological Department. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Environment – Table IN.EVB: Rainfall: by States.

A projection under SRES A1FI scenario for the 21st century. Model: CCSM3 The Community Climate System Model (CCSM) is a coupled model for simulating past, present and future climates. The Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3) is a coupled climate model with components representing the atmosphere, ocean, sea ice, and land surface connected by a flux coupler. Scenario A1F1(Worst case scenario) SRES A1FI is the worst case scenario among all scenarios. In SRES A1FI scenario, a future world of very rapid economic growth, low population growth and rapid introduction of new and more efficient technology are assumed.