The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation.

Linear Water Features includes single-line drainage water features and artificial path features that run through double-line drainage features such as rivers and streams, and serve as a linear representation of these features. The artificial path features may correspond to those in the USGS National Hydrographic Dataset (NHD). However, in many cases the features do not match NHD equivalent feature and will not carry the NHD metadata codes. These features have a MAF/TIGER Feature Classification Code (MTFCC) beginning with an "H" to indicate the super class of Hydrographic Features.

Digital data from VG10-2 Wright, S., Larsen, F., and Springston, G., 2010,�Surficial Geologic Map of the Town of Randolph, Vermont: Vermont Geological Survey Open-File Report VG10-2, 1 color plate, scale 1:24,000. Data may include surficial geologic contacts, isopach contours lines, bedrock outcrop polygons, bedrock geologic contacts, hydrogeologic units and more. The surficial geologic materials data at a scale of 1:24,000 depict types of unconsolidated surficial and glacial materials overlying bedrock in Vermont. Data is created by mapping on the ground using standard geologic pace and compass techniques and/or GPS on a USGS 1:24000 topographic base map. The materials data is selected from the Vermont Geological Survey Open File Report (OFR) publication (https://dec.vermont.gov/geological-survey/publication-gis/ofr). The OFR contains more complete descriptions of map units, cross-sections, isopach maps and other information that may not be included in this digital data set.

The food access profiles aim to democratize food resources and food access metrics in the mountain state through a combination of data that is representative of different food system stakeholders. Datasets that were used in these profiles are from the Department of Health and Human Resources, West Virginia Department of Education, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and research conducted by the WVU Food Justice Lab. Department of Health and Human ResourcesData was collected by WVDHHR and provided by request.West Virginia Department of EducationData was collected by WVDE and provided by request.This profile was created in 2021.

Town of Randolph, MA GIS Viewer

01-04-2018 OVERLAY DISTRICT. Models a municipality’s zoning zones and related information. Final boundary determinations must be obtained from the town Zoning Administrator. All decisions of the ZA are appealable to the DRB or ZBA. Bylaw PDF.

Geospatial data about Guilford County, NC Fire Districts. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.

01-04-2018 BASE DISTRICTS. Models a municipality’s zoning zones and related information. Final boundary determinations must be obtained from the town Zoning Administrator. All decisions of the ZA are appealable to the DRB or ZBA. Bylaw PDF.

2017 TIGER/Line® Shapefiles: Roads

Martinelli snow field contour lines. This dataset is part of the Martinelli grid geographic information system (GIS). Additional information concerning the Niwot Ridge LTER hierarchical GIS can be found in Walker et al. (1993).

NOTE: DO NOT DOWNLOAD THE IMAGERY BY USING THE MAP OR DOWNLOAD TOOLS ON THIS ARCGIS HUB ITEM PAGE. IT WILL RESULT IN A PIXELATED ORTHOIMAGE. INSTEAD, DOWNLOAD THE IMAGERY BY TILE OR BY COUNTY MOSAIC (2010 - current year).To view the latest imagery for any location in the state, customers should use the "Orthoimagery_Latest" image service which can be found at https://nconemap.gov.To view the latest imagery that is suitable for raster analysis, customers should use the "Orthoimagery_Latest_Analysis" image service which can be found at https://nconemap.gov.To find specific dates the images were captured use the imagery dates app or download the data.Metadata:Summary metadata for orthoimagery mosaicsSummary metadata for orthoimagery tilesContractor-specific metadata for Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, and Yancey countiesContractor-specific metadata for Alleghany, Ashe, Surry, Watauga, Wilkes, and Yadkin countiesContractor-specific metadata for Alexander, Catawba, Davie, Iredell, and Rowan countiesContractor-specific metadata for Alamance, Davidson, Forsyth, Guilford, and Randolph countiesContractor-specific metadata for Caswell, Rockingham, and Stokes counties

description: This dataset contains point features representing the approximate location of tax parcels contained in County Assessor tax rolls. Individual county data was integrated into this statewide publication by the Arkansas Geographic Information Office (AGIO). The Computer Aided Mass Appraisal (CAMA) systems maintained in each county are used to populate the database attributes for each centroid feature. The entity attribute structure conforms to the Arkansas Cadastral Mapping Standard. The digital cadastral data is provided as a publication version that only represents a snapshot of the production data at the time it was received from the county. Published updates may be made to counties throughout the year. These will occur after new data is digitized or updates to existing data are finished. Production versions of the data exist in the various counties where daily and weekly updates occur. Users should consult the BEGIN_DATE attribute column to determine the age of the data for a given county. This column reflects the date when AGIO received the data from the county. Only parcels with an associated Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA) record are provided. This means a CAMA record may exist, but no point geometry or vice-versa. Cadastral data is dynamic by its nature; therefore it is impossible for any county to ever be considered complete. The data is NOT topologically enforced. As a statewide integrator, AGIO publishes the data but does not make judgment calls about where points or polygon lines are meant to be located. Therefore each county data set is published without topology rules being enforced. GIS Technicians use best practices such as polygon closure and vertex snapping, however, topology is not built for each county. Users should be aware, by Arkansas Law (15-21-504 2 B) digital cadastral data does not represent legal property boundary descriptions, nor is it suitable for boundary determination of the individual parcels included in the cadastre. Users requiring a boundary determination should consult an Arkansas Registered Land Surveyor (http://www.arkansas.gov/pels/search/search.php) on boundary questions. The digital cadastral data is intended to be a graphical representation of the tax parcel only. Just because a county is listed does NOT imply the data represents county wide coverage. AGIO worked with each county to determine a level of production that warranted the data was ready to be published. For example, in some counties only the north part of the county was covered or in other cases only rural parcels are covered and yet in others only urban parcels. The approach is to begin incremental publishing as production blocks are ready, even though a county may not have county wide coverage. Each case represents a significant amount of data that will be useful immediately. Users should consult the BEGIN_DATE attribute column to determine the age of the data for a given county. This date reflects when the data was received from the county. Digital cadastral data users should be aware the County Assessor Mapping Program adopted a phased approach for developing cadastral data. Phase One includes the production of a parcel centroid for each parcel that bears the attributes prescribed by the state cadastral mapping standard. Phase Two includes the production of parcel polygon geometry and bears the standard attributes. The Arkansas standard closely mirrors the federal Cadastral Core Data Standard established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee, Subcommittee for Cadastral Data. Counties within this file include: Arkansas, Ashley, Baxter, Boone, Carroll, Chicot, Clark, Clay, Columbia, Conway, Craighead, Crawford, Cross, Desha, Faulkner, Franklin, Hot Spring, Howard, Izard, Jackson, Jefferson, Lafayette, Lincoln, Little River, Logan, Lonoke, Madison, Mississippi, Montgomery, Nevada, Newton, Perry, Pike, Poinsett, Polk, Pope, Pulaski, Randolph, Saline, Sebastian, Stone, Van Buren, Washington and White.; abstract: This dataset contains point features representing the approximate location of tax parcels contained in County Assessor tax rolls. Individual county data was integrated into this statewide publication by the Arkansas Geographic Information Office (AGIO). The Computer Aided Mass Appraisal (CAMA) systems maintained in each county are used to populate the database attributes for each centroid feature. The entity attribute structure conforms to the Arkansas Cadastral Mapping Standard. The digital cadastral data is provided as a publication version that only represents a snapshot of the production data at the time it was received from the county. Published updates may be made to counties throughout the year. These will occur after new data is digitized or updates to existing data are finished. Production versions of the data exist in the various counties where daily and weekly updates occur. Users should consult the BEGIN_DATE attribute column to determine the age of the data for a given county. This column reflects the date when AGIO received the data from the county. Only parcels with an associated Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA) record are provided. This means a CAMA record may exist, but no point geometry or vice-versa. Cadastral data is dynamic by its nature; therefore it is impossible for any county to ever be considered complete. The data is NOT topologically enforced. As a statewide integrator, AGIO publishes the data but does not make judgment calls about where points or polygon lines are meant to be located. Therefore each county data set is published without topology rules being enforced. GIS Technicians use best practices such as polygon closure and vertex snapping, however, topology is not built for each county. Users should be aware, by Arkansas Law (15-21-504 2 B) digital cadastral data does not represent legal property boundary descriptions, nor is it suitable for boundary determination of the individual parcels included in the cadastre. Users requiring a boundary determination should consult an Arkansas Registered Land Surveyor (http://www.arkansas.gov/pels/search/search.php) on boundary questions. The digital cadastral data is intended to be a graphical representation of the tax parcel only. Just because a county is listed does NOT imply the data represents county wide coverage. AGIO worked with each county to determine a level of production that warranted the data was ready to be published. For example, in some counties only the north part of the county was covered or in other cases only rural parcels are covered and yet in others only urban parcels. The approach is to begin incremental publishing as production blocks are ready, even though a county may not have county wide coverage. Each case represents a significant amount of data that will be useful immediately. Users should consult the BEGIN_DATE attribute column to determine the age of the data for a given county. This date reflects when the data was received from the county. Digital cadastral data users should be aware the County Assessor Mapping Program adopted a phased approach for developing cadastral data. Phase One includes the production of a parcel centroid for each parcel that bears the attributes prescribed by the state cadastral mapping standard. Phase Two includes the production of parcel polygon geometry and bears the standard attributes. The Arkansas standard closely mirrors the federal Cadastral Core Data Standard established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee, Subcommittee for Cadastral Data. Counties within this file include: Arkansas, Ashley, Baxter, Boone, Carroll, Chicot, Clark, Clay, Columbia, Conway, Craighead, Crawford, Cross, Desha, Faulkner, Franklin, Hot Spring, Howard, Izard, Jackson, Jefferson, Lafayette, Lincoln, Little River, Logan, Lonoke, Madison, Mississippi, Montgomery, Nevada, Newton, Perry, Pike, Poinsett, Polk, Pope, Pulaski, Randolph, Saline, Sebastian, Stone, Van Buren, Washington and White.

NOTE: DO NOT DOWNLOAD THE IMAGERY BY USING THE MAP OR DOWNLOAD TOOLS ON THIS ARCGIS HUB ITEM PAGE. IT WILL RESULT IN A PIXELATED ORTHOIMAGE. INSTEAD, DOWNLOAD THE IMAGERY BY TILE OR BY COUNTY MOSAIC (2010 - current year).This service depicts true color imagery for the 26 counties representing the Northern Piedmont and Mountains region of North Carolina. This includes the following counties: Alamance, Alexander, Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Caswell, Catawba, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Iredell, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, Randolph, Rockingham, Rowan, Stokes, Surry, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin, and Yancey. The imagery has a pixel resolution of 6 inches and was flown in the beginning of 2018. The RMSE is 1.5 ft X and Y. Individual pixel values may have been altered during image processing. Therefore, this service should be used for general reference and viewing. Image analysis requiring examination of individual pixel values is discouraged. To view the latest imagery for any location in the state, customers should use the "Orthoimagery_Latest" image service (https://services.nconemap.gov/secure/rest/services/Imagery/Orthoimagery_Latest/ImageServer).To find specific dates the images were captured use the imagery dates app or download the data.Metadata:Summary metadata for orthoimagery mosaicsSummary metadata for orthoimagery tilesContractor-specific metadata for Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Madison, McDowell, Mitchell, Yancey countiesContractor-specific metadata for Alexander, Alleghany, Ashe, Catawba, Iredell, Watauga and Wilkes countiesContractor-specific metadata for Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Rowan, Surry, Stokes, and Yadkin countiesContractor-specific metadata for Alamance, Caswell, Guilford, Randolph, and Rockingham counties

Resampled version of Martinelli snow field lattice grid (martlat) with finer resolution. This dataset is part of the Martinelli grid geographic information system (GIS). Additional information concerning the Niwot Ridge LTER hierarchical GIS can be found in Walker et al. (1993).

The Georgia Flood MAP Program provides FEMA flood study models for download. Where available, hydraulic models are provided in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ HEC-RAS format, which meet all FEMA NFIP guidelines and specifications. Please note, modeling extents may vary from what is shown on FEMA’s regulatory products. It is recommended that users compare downloaded models with the latest effective regulatory products published by FEMA before use. By accepting the download disclaimer, the user agrees that the model is provided as-is for use and analysis.

Imagery/IL_Randolph_1940

(Link to Metadata) The VTORTHO_0_13M_PAN_1998 data includes panchromatic (black and white) orthophotography (orthophoto) at 1:1250 scale (0.125 meter cell resolution) for Randolph Village only. The imagery was acquired on April 22nd, 1998.

Tile Download Link Orthoimagery at 1' and 6" resolution encompassing all of Augusta, Manchester, Hallowell, Farmingdale, and Garinder, Maine. Portions of other adjacent towns are covered including Belgrade, Chelsea, Dresden, Litchfield, Pittston, Randolph, Readfield, Richmond, Sidney, Vassalboro, West Gardiner, Windsor, and Winthrop. The data were collected in a single session on May 6, 2008. LiDAR data were also collected and are available elsewhere. The 6" imagery is available for the northern part of the area, Augusta and Manchester principally. 1' imagery is for the southern area of the collect. The data were collected and processed by James W. Sewall Co of Old Town, Maine. The LiDAR data were collected and processed by Photo Science, Inc., of Lexington, KY. The scale of 1:7920 was used to produce a mapping scale of 1" = 660'.

The Technology Transfer (T2) Program is a nationwide effort financed jointly by the Federal Highway Administration and individual state departments of transportation. Its purpose is to transfer the latest state-of-the-art technology in the areas of roads and bridges by translating the technology into terms understood by local and state highway or transportation personnel.Filter by county using the codes below and the query: example Peoria (INV_CO = '072')

001 ADAMS

019 DE KALB

037 HENRY

055 MC DONOUGH

073 PERRY

091 UNION

002 ALEXANDER

020 DE WITT

038 IROQOUIS

056 MC HENRY

074 PIATT

092 VERMILION

003 BOND

021 DOUGLAS

039 JACKSON

057 MC LEAN

075 PIKE

093 WABASH

004 BOONE

022 DU PAGE

040 JASPER

058 MACON

076 POPE

094 WARREN

005 BROWN

023 EDGAR

041 JEFFERSON

059 MACOUPIN

077 PULASKI

095 WASHINGTON

006 BUREAU

024 EDWARDS

042 JERSEY

060 MADISON

078 PUTNAM

096 WAYNE

007 CALHOUN

025 EFFINGHAM

043 JO DAVIESS

061 MARION

079 RANDOLPH

097 WHITE

008 CARROLL

026 FAYETTE

044 JOHNSON

062 MARSHALL

080 RICHLAND

098 WHITESIDE

009 CASS

027 FORD

045 KANE

063 MASON

081 ROCK ISLAND

099 WILL

010CHAMPAIGN

028 FRANKLIN

046KANKAKEE

064 MASSAC

082 ST. CLAIR

100 WILLIAMSON

011 CHRISTIAN

029 FULTON

047 KENDALL

065 MENARD

083 SALINE

101 WINNEBAGO

012 CLARK

030 GALLATIN

048 KNOX

066 MERCER

084 SANGAMON

102 WOODFORD

013 CLAY

031 GREENE

049 LAKE

067 MONROE

085 SCHUYLER

014 CLINTON

032 GRUNDY

050 LA SALLE

068 MONTGOMERY

086 SCOTT

015 COLES

033 HAMILTON

051 LAWRENCE

069 MORGAN

087 SHELBY

016 COOK

034 HANCOCK

052 LEE

070 MOULTRIE

088 STARK

017 CRAWFORD

035 HARDIN

053 LIVINGSTON

071 OGLE

089 STEPHENSON

018 CUMBERLAND

036 HENDERSON

054 LOGAN

072 PEORIA

090 TAZEWELL

Attachment regarding public Hearing request to rezone all or a portion of the following parcels below from R-1, Residential to the district that is listed. The properties or portions of properties located within 1500 feet of US 421 North from the Town of Siler City extraterritorial planning jurisdiction to the Chatham County/Randolph County line are Parcel 61599 owned by BROWER STEPHEN LEE to Heavy Industrial; Parcel 76196 owned by BROWER STEPHEN LEE & ELLEN S to Heavy Industrial.

In 2022, on behalf of the North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis four contractors captured 6-inch pixel 4-band (RGB-IR) orthoimagery for the 26 Northern Piedmont and mountain counties in North Carolina. These contractors are Spatial Data Consultants, Inc., Sanborn Map Company, Atlas Geographic Data, Surdex Corporation, and Survey and Mapping (SAM). This file documents the mosaic of the imagery exposures and associated seamlines used to generate the collection of imagery by the contractors for the entire study area of North Carolina for the following counties , Alamance, Alexander, Alleghany, Ashe, Avery, Burke, Caldwell, Caswell, Catawba, Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Iredell, Madison, Mcdowell, Mitchell, Randolph, Rockingham, Rowan, Stokes, Surry, Watauga, Wilkes, Yadkin, Yancey; and the date each exposure was flown. Seamlines were converted to polygon shapefile format, checked for gaps and overlaps, attributed, and trimmed to the study area boundary. This dataset contains a polygon seamline index attributed with, Exposure date the season. These attributes were based on information collected from individual frames and from flight line datasets. This seamline dataset was created to identify the individual exposure frames and the seamlines that join these exposures together to generate the orthoimagery product for the Northern Piedmont and Mountains 2022 Project (NPM22). The purpose of this dataset derives information from the exploitation flight lines to provide the specific dates of imagery acquisition for each image frame.