High resolution land cover data set for New York City. This is the 3ft version of the high-resolution land cover dataset for New York City. Seven land cover classes were mapped: (1) tree canopy, (2) grass/shrub, (3) bare earth, (4) water, (5) buildings, (6) roads, and (7) other paved surfaces. The minimum mapping unit for the delineation of features was set at 3 square feet. The primary sources used to derive this land cover layer were the 2010 LiDAR and the 2008 4-band orthoimagery. Ancillary data sources included GIS data (city boundary, building footprints, water, parking lots, roads, railroads, railroad structures, ballfields) provided by New York City (all ancillary datasets except railroads); UVM Spatial Analysis Laboratory manually created railroad polygons from manual interpretation of 2008 4-band orthoimagery. The tree canopy class was considered current as of 2010; the remaining land-cover classes were considered current as of 2008. Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) techniques were employed to extract land cover information using the best available remotely sensed and vector GIS datasets. OBIA systems work by grouping pixels into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial properties, while taking into account boundaries imposed by existing vector datasets. Within the OBIA environment a rule-based expert system was designed to effectively mimic the process of manual image analysis by incorporating the elements of image interpretation (color/tone, texture, pattern, location, size, and shape) into the classification process. A series of morphological procedures were employed to insure that the end product is both accurate and cartographically pleasing. More than 35,000 corrections were made to the classification. Overall accuracy was 96%. This dataset was developed as part of the Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) Assessment for New York City. As such, it represents a 'top down' mapping perspective in which tree canopy over hanging other features is assigned to the tree canopy class. At the time of its creation this dataset represents the most detailed and accurate land cover dataset for the area. This project was funded by National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council (NUCFAC) and the National Science Fundation (NSF), although it is not specifically endorsed by either agency. The methods used were developed by the University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Laboratory, in collaboration with the New York City Urban Field Station, with funding from the USDA Forest Service.

A 6-in resolution 8-class land cover dataset derived from the 2017 Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data capture. This dataset was developed as part of an updated urban tree canopy assessment and therefore represents a ''top-down" mapping perspective in which tree canopy overhanging features is assigned to the tree canopy class. The eight land cover classes mapped were: (1) Tree Canopy, (2) Grass\Shrubs, (3) Bare Soil, (4) Water, (5) Buildings, (6) Roads, (7) Other Impervious, and (8) Railroads. The primary sources used to derive this land cover layer were 2017 LiDAR (1-ft post spacing) and 2016 4-band orthoimagery (0.5-ft resolution). Object based image analysis was used to automate land-cover features using LiDAR point clouds and derivatives, orthoimagery, and vector GIS datasets -- City Boundary (2017, NYC DoITT) Buildings (2017, NYC DoITT) Hydrography (2014, NYC DoITT) LiDAR Hydro Breaklines (2017, NYC DoITT) Transportation Structures (2014, NYC DoITT) Roadbed (2014, NYC DoITT) Road Centerlines (2014, NYC DoITT) Railroads (2014, NYC DoITT) Green Roofs (date unknown, NYC Parks) Parking Lots (2014, NYC DoITT) Parks (2016, NYC Parks) Sidewalks (2014, NYC DoITT) Synthetic Turf (2018, NYC Parks) Wetlands (2014, NYC Parks) Shoreline (2014, NYC DoITT) Plazas (2014, NYC DoITT) Utility Poles (2014, ConEdison via NYCEM) Athletic Facilities (2017, NYC Parks)

For the purposes of classification, only vegetation > 8 ft were classed as Tree Canopy. Vegetation below 8 ft was classed as Grass/Shrub.

To learn more about this dataset, visit the interactive "Understanding the 2017 New York City LiDAR Capture" Story Map -- https://maps.nyc.gov/lidar/2017/ Please see the following link for additional documentation on this dataset -- https://github.com/CityOfNewYork/nyc-geo-metadata/blob/master/Metadata/Metadata_LandCover.md

MODIS Water Lake Powell Raster Dataset

  Dataset Summary

Raster dataset comprised of MODIS surface reflectance bands along with calculated indices and a label (water/not-water)

  Dataset Structure





  Data Fields

water: Label, water or not-water (binary) sur_refl_b01_1: MODIS surface reflection band 1 (-100, 16000) sur_refl_b02_1: MODIS surface reflection band 2 (-100, 16000) sur_refl_b03_1: MODIS surface reflection band 3 (-100, 16000) sur_refl_b04_1:… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/nasa-cisto-data-science-group/modis-lake-powell-raster-dataset.

Data were derived from 2014 6" resolution Island County lidar data using ArcGIS and Spatial Analyst Tools. The resulting raster was then converted to polygons. Polygons spanning elevation differences <10' were deleted.

An index of TIFs received from the Rural Water Association. The TIFs are comparable to the Unconsolidated Aquifers and the Surficial Geologic Matetrials shapefiles. Data exists for the following towns: Ancram, Austerlitz, Chatham, Claverack, Copake, Germantown, Ghent, Hillsdale, Stuyvesant, and Taghkanic.

TIF Data current as of March 2016.

Rasters assocaited with elevation (from the National elevation dataset), slope (created from the elevation dataset using ArcGIS), a Shannon diversity index as a metric of landscape fragmentation (created from the forest/shrub layer using Fragstats), distance to all roads (created in ArcGIS using a road TIGER shapefile), distance to forest/shrubs (created using NLCD 2016 data), human population density (created using data from the US Census Bureau). All rasters are at a 90m resolution.

ESRI GRID raster datasets were created to display and quantify nahcolite resources for eight oil shale zones in the Piceance Basin, Colorado as part of a 2009 National Oil Shale and Nahcolite Assessment. The zones in descending order are: L-5, R-5, L-4, R-4, L-3, R-3, L-2, and R-2. Each raster cell represents a one-acre square of the land surface and contains values for nahcolite tonnage. The gridnames follow the naming convention _n, where "" can be replaced by the name of the oil shale zone.

The SWOT Level 2 KaRIn High Rate Raster Product (SWOT_L2_HR_Raster_D) provides rasterized estimates of water surface elevation, inundation extent, and radar backscatter derived from high-resolution radar observations by the Ka-band Radar Interferometer (KaRIn) on the SWOT satellite. This product aggregates the irregularly spaced pixel cloud data from the PIXC and PIXCVec products onto a uniform geographic grid to facilitate spatial analysis of water surface features across inland, estuarine, and coastal domains.

Standard granules cover non-overlapping 128 × 128 km² scenes in the UTM projection at 100 m and 250 m resolution, stored in NetCDF-4 format. Each file contains 2D image layers representing water surface elevation (corrected for geoid, solid Earth, load, and pole tides, as well as atmospheric and ionospheric path delays), surface area, water fraction, and sigma0, along with quality flags and uncertainty estimates. On-demand versions are available at user-specified resolutions and projections, with optional overlapping granules and GeoTIFF output via SWODLR: https://swodlr.podaac.earthdatacloud.nasa.gov/

The raster product offers a gridded alternative to the unstructured pixel cloud, supporting hydrologic and geomorphic analyses in complex flow environments such as braided rivers, floodplains, wetlands, and coastal zones. It enables consistent spatiotemporal sampling while reducing noise through spatial aggregation, making it especially suitable for applications that require map-like continuity or integration with geospatial models.
This dataset is the parent collection to the following sub-collections:
https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/SWOT_L2_HR_Raster_100m_D
https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/dataset/SWOT_L2_HR_Raster_250m_D

This database (2006) is a set of raster data sets that have been derived from the European soil Database v2, for most attributes. The values for the attributes are categorized (non-continuous). These rasters are an interpretation of the data that are contained in the ESDB v2.0

An ESRI GRID raster data model of the overburden material above the Mahogany Zone was needed to perform calculations in the Piceance Basin, Colorado as part of a 2009 National Oil Shale Assessment.

The attached data are some large GIS raster files (GeoTIFFs) made with Natural Earth data. Natural Earth is a free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com. The data used for creating these large files was the "Cross Blended Hypso with Shaded Relief and Water". Data was concatenated to achieve larger and larger files. Internal pyramids were created, in order that the files can be opened easily in a GIS software such as QGIS or by a (future) GIS data visualisation module integrated in EnviDat. Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com

Acknowledgements: The CORE format was proudly inspired by the Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF (COG) format, by considering how to leverage the ability of clients issuing ​HTTP GET range requests for a time-series of remote sensing and aerial imagery (instead of just one image).

License: The Cloud Optimized Raster Encoding (CORE) specifications are released to the public domain under a Creative Commons 1.0 CC0 "No Rights Reserved" international license. You can reuse the information contained herein in any way you want, for any purposes and without restrictions.

Summary: The Cloud Optimized Raster Encoding (CORE) format is being developed for the efficient storage and management of gridded data by applying video encoding algorithms. It is mainly designed for the exchange and preservation of large time series data in environmental data repositories, while in the same time enabling more efficient workflows on the cloud. It can be applied to any large number of similar (in pixel size and image dimensions) raster data layers. CORE is not designed to replace COG but to work together with COG for a collection of many layers (e.g. by offering a fast preview of layers when switching between layers of a time series). WARNING: Currently only applicable to RGB/Byte imagery. The final CORE specifications may probably be very different from what is written herein or CORE may not ever become productive due to a myriad of reasons (see also 'Major issues to be solved'). With this early public sharing of the format we explicitly support the Open Science agenda, which implies "shifting from the standard practices of publishing research results in scientific publications towards sharing and using all available knowledge at an earlier stage in the research process" (quote from: European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation, 2016. Open innovation, open science, open to the world). CORE Specifications: 1) a MP4 or WebM video digital multimedia container format (or any future video container playable as HTML video in major browsers) 2) a free to use or open video compression codec such as H.264, VP9, or AV1 (or any future video codec that is open sourced or free to use for end users) Note: H.264 is currently recommended because of the wide usage with support in all major browsers, fast encoding due to acceleration in hardware (which is currently not the case for AV1 or VP9) and the fact that MPEG LA has allowed the free use for streaming video that is free to the end users. However, please note that H.264 is restricted by patents and its use in proprietary or commercial software requires the payment of royalties to MPEG LA. However, when AV1 matures and accelerated hardware encoding becomes available, AV1 is expected to offer 30% to 50% smaller file size in comparison with H.264, while retaining the same quality. 3) the encoding frame rate should be of one frame per second (fps) with each layer segmented in internal tiles, similar to COG, ordered by the main use case when accessing the data: either layer contiguous or tile contiguous; Note: The internal tile arrangement should support an easy navigation inside the CORE video format, depending on the use case. 4) a CORE file is optimised for streaming with the moov atom at the beginning of the file (e.g. with -movflags faststart) and optional additional optimisations depending on the codec used (e.g. -tune fastdecode -tune zerolatency for H.264) 5) metadata tags inside the moov atom for describing and using geographic image data (that are preferably compatible with the OGC GeoTIFF standard or any future standard accepted by the geospatial community) as well as list of original file names corresponding to each CORE layer 6) it needs to encode similar source rasters (such as time series of rasters with the same extent and resolution, or different tiles of the same product; each input raster should be having the same image and pixel size) 7) it provides a mechanism for addressing and requesting overviews (lower resolution data) for a fast display in web browser depending on the map scale (currently external overviews) Major issues to be solved: - Internal overviews (similar to COG), by chaining lower resolution videos in the same MP4 container for fast access to overviews first); Currently, overviews are kept as separate files, as external overviews. - Metadata encoding (how to best encode spatial extent, layer names, and so on, for each of the layer inside the series, which may have a different geographical extent, etc...; Known issues: adding too many tags with FFmpeg which are not part of the standard MP4 moov atom; metadata tags have a limited string length. - Applicability beyond RGB/Byte datasets; defining a standard way of converting cell values from Int16/UInt16/UInt32/Int32/Float32/Float64/ data types into multi-band Byte values (and reconstructing them back to the original data type within acceptable thresholds) Example Notice: The provided CORE (.mp4) examples contain modified Copernicus Sentinel data [2018-2021]. For generating the CORE examples provided, 50 original Sentinel 2 (S-2) TCI data images from an area located inside Switzerland were downloaded from www.copernicus.eu, and then transformed into CORE format using ffmpeg with H.264 encoding using the x264 library. DISCLAIMER: Basic scripts are provided for the Geomatics peer review (in 2021) and kept as additional information for the dataset. Nevertheless, please note that software dependencies and libraries, as well as cloud storage paths, may quickly become deprecated over time (after 2021). For compatibility, stable dependencies and libraries released around 2020 should be used.

Spatial analysis and statistical summaries of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) provide land managers and decision makers with a general assessment of management intent for biodiversity protection, natural resource management, and recreation access across the nation. The PAD-US 3.0 Combined Fee, Designation, Easement feature class in the full geodatabase inventory (with Military Lands and Tribal Areas from the Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries feature class) was modified to prioritize overlapping designations, avoiding massive overestimation in protected area statistics, and simplified by the following PAD-US attributes to support user needs for raster analysis data: Manager Type, Manager Name, Designation Type, GAP Status Code, Public Access, and State Name. The rasterization process (see processing steps below) prioritized overlapping designations previously identified (GAP_Prity field) in the Vector Analysis File (e.g. Wilderness within a National Forest) based upon their relative biodiversity conservation (e.g. GAP Status Code 1 over 2). The 30-meter Image (IMG) grid Raster Analysis Files area extents were defined by the Census state boundary file used to clip the Vector Analysis File, the data source for rasterization ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysis_State_Clip_CENSUS2020" feature class from ("PADUS3_0VectorAnalysisFileOtherExtents_Clip_Census.gdb"). Alaska (AK) and Hawaii (HI) raster data are separated from the contiguous U.S. (CONUS) to facilitate analyses at manageable scales. Note, the PAD-US inventory is now considered functionally complete with the vast majority of land protection types (with a legal protection mechanism) represented in some manner, while work continues to maintain updates, improve data quality, and integrate new data as it becomes available (see inventory completeness estimates at: http://www.protectedlands.net/data-stewards/ ). In addition, protection status represents a point-in-time and changes in status between versions of PAD-US may be attributed to improving the completeness and accuracy of the spatial data more than actual management actions or new acquisitions. USGS provides no legal warranty for the use of this data. While PAD-US is the official aggregation of protected areas ( https://www.fgdc.gov/ngda-reports/NGDA_Datasets.html ), agencies are the best source of their lands data.

An ESRI GRID raster data model of the overburden material above the Mahogany bed was needed to perform calculations in the Uinta Basin, Utah and Colorado as part of a 2009 National Oil Shale Assessment.

A series of maps at 1:10 000 scale showing base mapping for Northern Ireland. These raster maps can be used with other maps or information to enhance the mapping. Midscale Raster for Northern Ireland can be used as a general background to give context at local and regional level and as a base to overlay data. Includes water bodies, rivers, main roads, town names and townlands.

The data were created by transformation of vector cadastral component of SM 5 to raster file. In territories, where vector SM 5 has not been created yet, the cadastral and altimetry components were created by scanning of individual printing masters of planimetry and altimetry from the last issue of the State Map 1:5,000 - derived. The cadastral component does not contain parcel numbers.

The data were created by transformation of vector cadastral component of SM 5 to raster file. In territories, where vector SM 5 has not been created yet, the cadastral and altimetry components were created by scanning of individual printing masters of planimetry and altimetry from the last issue of the State Map 1:5,000 - derived. The cadastral component does not contain parcel numbers.

The High Plains aquifer extends from approximately 32 to 44 degrees north latitude and 96 degrees 30 minutes to 106 degrees west longitude. The aquifer underlies about 175,000 square miles in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. This digital dataset consists of a raster of water-level changes for the High Plains aquifer, predevelopment (about 1950) to 2019. It was created using water-level measurements from 2,741 wells measured in both the predevelopment period (about 1950) and in 2019, the latest available static water level measured in 2015 to 2018 from 71 wells in New Mexico and using other published information on water-level change in areas with few water-level measurements. The map was reviewed for consistency with the relevant data at a scale of 1:1,000,000. Negative raster-cell values correspond to decline in water level and positive raster-cell values correspond to water-level rise.

Natural Earth is a public domain map dataset available at 1:10m, 1:50m, and 1:110 million scales. Featuring tightly integrated vector and raster data, with Natural Earth you can make a variety of visually pleasing, well-crafted maps with cartography or GIS software.

Large scale data, 1:10m

The most detailed. Suitable for making zoomed-in maps of countries and regions. Show the world on a large wall poster.

Medium scale data, 1:50m

Suitable for making zoomed-out maps of countries and regions. Show the world on a tabloid size page.

Small scale data, 1:110m

Suitable for schematic maps of the world on a postcard or as a small locator globe.

Abstract

The Urban Green Raster Germany is a land cover classification for Germany that addresses in particular the urban vegetation areas. The raster dataset covers the terrestrial national territory of Germany and has a spatial resolution of 10 meters. The dataset is based on a fully automated classification of Sentinel-2 satellite data from a full 2018 vegetation period using reference data from the European LUCAS land use and land cover point dataset.
The dataset identifies eight land cover classes. These include Built-up, Built-up with significant green share, Coniferous wood, Deciduous wood, Herbaceous vegetation (low perennial vegetation), Water, Open soil, Arable land (low seasonal vegetation).
The land cover dataset provided here is offered as an integer raster in GeoTiff format. The assignment of the number coding to the corresponding land cover class is explained in the legend file.

Data acquisition

The data acquisition comprises two main processing steps: (1) Collection, processing, and automated classification of the multispectral Sentinel 2 satellite data with the “Land Cover DE method”, resulting in the raw land cover classification dataset, NDVI layer, and RF assignment frequency vector raster. (2) GIS-based postprocessing including discrimination of (densely) built-up and loosely built-up pixels according NDVI threshold, and creating water-body and arable-land masks from geo-topographical base-data (ATKIS Basic DLM) and reclassification of water and arable land pixels based on the assignment frequency.

Data collection

Satellite data were searched and downloaded from the Copernicus Open Access Hub (https://scihub.copernicus.eu/).

The LUCAS reference and validation points were loaded from the Eurostat platform (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lucas/data/database).

The processing of the satellite data was performed at the DLR data center in Oberpfaffenhofen.

GIS-based post-processing of the automatic classification result was performed at IOER in Dresden.

Value of the data

The dataset can be used to quantify the amount of green areas within cities on a homogeneous data base [5].

Thus it is possible to compare cities of different sizes regarding their greenery and with respect to their ratio of green and built-up areas [6].

Built-up areas within cities can be discriminated regarding their built-up density (dense built-up vs. built-up with higher green share).

Data description

A Raster dataset in GeoTIFF format: The dataset is stored as an 8 bit integer raster with values ranging from 1 to 8 for the eight different land cover classes. The nomenclature of the coded values is as follows: 1 = Built-up, 2=open soil; 3=Coniferous wood, 4= Deciduous wood, 5=Arable land (low seasonal vegetation), 6=Herbaceous vegetation (low perennial vegetation), 7=Water, 8=Built-up with significant green share. Name of the file ugr2018_germany.tif. The dataset is zipped alongside with accompanying files: *.twf (geo-referencing world-file), *.ovr (Overlay file for quick data preview in GIS), *.clr (Color map file).

A text file with the integer value assignment of the land cover classes. Name of the file: Legend_LC-classes.txt.

Experimental design, materials and methods

The first essential step to create the dataset is the automatic classification of a satellite image mosaic of all available Sentinel-2 images from May to September 2018 with a maximum cloud cover of 60 percent. Points from the 2018 LUCAS (Land use and land cover survey) dataset from Eurostat [1] were used as reference and validation data. Using Random Forest (RF) classifier [2], seven land use classes (Deciduous wood, Coniferous wood, Herbaceous vegetation (low perennial vegetation), Built-up, Open soil, Water, Arable land (low seasonal vegetation)) were first derived, which is methodologically in line with the procedure used to create the dataset "Land Cover DE - Sentinel-2 - Germany, 2015" [3]. The overall accuracy of the data is 93 % [4].

Two downstream post-processing steps served to further qualify the product. The first step included the selective verification of pixels of the classes arable land and water. These are often misidentified by the classifier due to radiometric similarities with other land covers; in particular, radiometric signatures of water surfaces often resemble shadows or asphalt surfaces. Due to the heterogeneous inner-city structures, pixels are also frequently misclassified as cropland.

To mitigate these errors, all pixels classified as water and arable land were matched with another data source. This consisted of binary land cover masks for these two land cover classes originating from the Monitor of Settlement and Open Space Development (IOER Monitor). For all water and cropland pixels that were outside of their respective masks, the frequencies of class assignments from the RF classifier were checked. If the assignment frequency to water or arable land was at least twice that to the subsequent class, the classification was preserved. Otherwise, the classification strength was considered too weak and the pixel was recoded to the land cover with the second largest assignment frequency.

Furthermore, an additional land cover class "Built-up with significant vegetation share" was introduced. For this purpose, all pixels of the Built-up class were intersected with the NDVI of the satellite image mosaic and assigned to the new category if an NDVI threshold was exceeded in the pixel. The associated NDVI threshold was previously determined using highest resolution reference data of urban green structures in the cities of Dresden, Leipzig and Potsdam, which were first used to determine the true green fractions within the 10m Sentinel pixels, and based on this to determine an NDVI value that could be used as an indicator of a significant green fraction within the built-up pixel. However, due to the wide dispersion of green fraction values within the built-up areas, it is not possible to establish a universally valid green percentage value for the land cover class of Built-up with significant vegetation share. Thus, the class essentially serves to the visual differentiability of densely and loosely (i.e., vegetation-dominated) built-up areas.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR) [10.06.03.18.101].The provided data has been developed and created in the framework of the research project “Wie grün sind bundesdeutsche Städte?- Fernerkundliche Erfassung und stadträumlich-funktionale Differenzierung der Grünausstattung von Städten in Deutschland (Erfassung der urbanen Grünausstattung)“ (How green are German cities?- Remote sensing and urban-functional differentiation of the green infrastructure of cities in Germany (Urban Green Infrastructure Inventory)). Further persons involved in the project were: Fabian Dosch (funding administrator at BBSR), Stefan Fina (research partner, group leader at ILS Dortmund), Annett Frick, Kathrin Wagner (research partners at LUP Potsdam).

References

[1] Eurostat (2021): Land cover / land use statistics database LUCAS. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lucas/data/database

[2] L. Breiman (2001). Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, pp. 5-32

[3] M. Weigand, M. Wurm (2020). Land Cover DE - Sentinel-2—Germany, 2015 [Data set]. German Aerospace Center (DLR). doi: 10.15489/1CCMLAP3MN39

[4] M. Weigand, J. Staab, M. Wurm, H. Taubenböck, (2020). Spatial and semantic effects of LUCAS samples on fully automated land use/land cover classification in high-resolution Sentinel-2 data. Int J Appl Earth Obs, 88, 102065. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102065

[5] L. Eichler., T. Krüger, G. Meinel, G. (2020). Wie grün sind deutsche Städte? Indikatorgestützte fernerkundliche Erfassung des Stadtgrüns. AGIT Symposium 2020, 6, 306–315. doi: 10.14627/537698030

[6] H. Taubenböck, M. Reiter, F. Dosch, T. Leichtle, M. Weigand, M. Wurm (2021). Which city is the greenest? A multi-dimensional deconstruction of city rankings. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 89, 101687. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101687