Notice: this is not the latest Heat Island Anomalies image service. For 2023 data visit https://tpl.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=e89a556263e04cb9b0b4638253ca8d10.This layer contains the relative degrees Fahrenheit difference between any given pixel and the mean heat value for the city in which it is located, for every city in the contiguous United States. This 30-meter raster was derived from Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summer of 2021, with patching from summer of 2020 where necessary.Federal statistics over a 30-year period show extreme heat is the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the United States. Extreme heat exacerbated by urban heat islands can lead to increased respiratory difficulties, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. These heat impacts significantly affect the most vulnerable—children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions.The purpose of this layer is to show where certain areas of cities are hotter or cooler than the average temperature for that same city as a whole. This dataset represents a snapshot in time. It will be updated yearly, but is static between updates. It does not take into account changes in heat during a single day, for example, from building shadows moving. The thermal readings detected by the Landsat 8 sensor are surface-level, whether that surface is the ground or the top of a building. Although there is strong correlation between surface temperature and air temperature, they are not the same. We believe that this is useful at the national level, and for cities that don’t have the ability to conduct their own hyper local temperature survey. Where local data is available, it may be more accurate than this dataset. Dataset SummaryThis dataset was developed using proprietary Python code developed at The Trust for Public Land, running on the Descartes Labs platform through the Descartes Labs API for Python. The Descartes Labs platform allows for extremely fast retrieval and processing of imagery, which makes it possible to produce heat island data for all cities in the United States in a relatively short amount of time.In order to click on the image service and see the raw pixel values in a map viewer, you must be signed in to ArcGIS Online, then Enable Pop-Ups and Configure Pop-Ups.Using the Urban Heat Island (UHI) Image ServicesThe data is made available as an image service. There is a processing template applied that supplies the yellow-to-red or blue-to-red color ramp, but once this processing template is removed (you can do this in ArcGIS Pro or ArcGIS Desktop, or in QGIS), the actual data values come through the service and can be used directly in a geoprocessing tool (for example, to extract an area of interest). Following are instructions for doing this in Pro.In ArcGIS Pro, in a Map view, in the Catalog window, click on Portal. In the Portal window, click on the far-right icon representing Living Atlas. Search on the acronyms “tpl” and “uhi”. The results returned will be the UHI image services. Right click on a result and select “Add to current map” from the context menu. When the image service is added to the map, right-click on it in the map view, and select Properties. In the Properties window, select Processing Templates. On the drop-down menu at the top of the window, the default Processing Template is either a yellow-to-red ramp or a blue-to-red ramp. Click the drop-down, and select “None”, then “OK”. Now you will have the actual pixel values displayed in the map, and available to any geoprocessing tool that takes a raster as input. Below is a screenshot of ArcGIS Pro with a UHI image service loaded, color ramp removed, and symbology changed back to a yellow-to-red ramp (a classified renderer can also be used): Other Sources of Heat Island InformationPlease see these websites for valuable information on heat islands and to learn about exciting new heat island research being led by scientists across the country:EPA’s Heat Island Resource CenterDr. Ladd Keith, University of ArizonaDr. Ben McMahan, University of Arizona Dr. Jeremy Hoffman, Science Museum of Virginia Dr. Hunter Jones, NOAA Daphne Lundi, Senior Policy Advisor, NYC Mayor's Office of Recovery and ResiliencyDisclaimer/FeedbackWith nearly 14,000 cities represented, checking each city's heat island raster for quality assurance would be prohibitively time-consuming, so The Trust for Public Land checked a statistically significant sample size for data quality. The sample passed all quality checks, with about 98.5% of the output cities error-free, but there could be instances where the user finds errors in the data. These errors will most likely take the form of a line of discontinuity where there is no city boundary; this type of error is caused by large temperature differences in two adjacent Landsat scenes, so the discontinuity occurs along scene boundaries (see figure below). The Trust for Public Land would appreciate feedback on these errors so that version 2 of the national UHI dataset can be improved. Contact Dale.Watt@tpl.org with feedback.

Important Note: This item is in mature support as of April 2024 and will be retired in December 2026. A new version of this item is available for your use. Esri recommends updating your maps and apps to use the new version.The combined processes of evaporation and transpiration, known as evapotranspiration (ET), plays a key role in the water cycle. Precipitation that falls on land can either run off in streams and rivers, soak into the ground, or return to the atmosphere through evapotranspiration. Water that evaporates returns directly to the atmosphere while water that is transpired is taken up by plant roots and lost to the atmosphere through the leaves.Evapotranspiration data can be used to calculate regional water and energy balance and soil water status and provides key information for water resource management. Potential evapotranspiration, the amount of ET that would occur if soil moisture were not limited, is a purely meteorological characteristic, based on air temperature, solar radiation, and wind speed. Actual evapotranspiration also depends on water availability, so it might occur at very close to the potential rate in a rainforest, but be much lower in a desert despite the higher potential there.Dataset SummaryPhenomenon Mapped: EvapotranspirationUnits: Millimeters per yearCell Size: 927.6623821756539 metersSource Type: ContinuousPixel Type: 16-bit unsigned integerData Coordinate System: Web Mercator Auxiliary SphereExtent: Global Source: University of Montana Numerical Terradynamic Simulation GroupPublication Date: March 10, 2015ArcGIS Server URL: https://landscape6.arcgis.com/arcgis/This layer provides access to a 1km cell sized raster of average annual evaporative loss from the land surface, measured in mm/year. Data are from the MOD16 Global Evapotranspiration Product, which is derived from MODIS imagery by a team of researchers at the University of Montana. This algorithm, which involves estimating land surface temperature and albedo and using them to solve the Penman-Monteith equation, is not valid over urban or barren land so these are shown as NoData, as is any open water. For all other pixels, the algorithm was used to estimate evapotranspiration for every 8-day period from 2000 to 2014 and these estimates have been averaged together to come up with the annual normal. You can also get access to the monthly totals using the MODIS Toolbox.What can you do with this Layer? This layer is suitable for both visualization and analysis across the ArcGIS system. This layer can be combined with your data and other layers from the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Pro to create powerful web maps that can be used alone or in a story map or other application.Because this layer is part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World it is easy to add to your map:In ArcGIS Online, you can add this layer to a map by selecting Add then Browse Living Atlas Layers. A window will open. Type "evapotranspiration" in the search box and browse to the layer. Select the layer then click Add to Map.In ArcGIS Pro, open a map and select Add Data from the Map Tab. Select Data at the top of the drop down menu. The Add Data dialog box will open on the left side of the box, expand Portal if necessary, then select Living Atlas. Type "evapotranspiration" in the search box, browse to the layer then click OK.In ArcGIS Pro you can use the built-in raster functions or create your own to create custom extracts of the data. Imagery layers provide fast, powerful inputs to geoprocessing tools, models, or Python scripts in Pro.The ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World provides an easy way to explore many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics like this one.

This dataset contains 50-ft contours for the Hot Springs shallowest unit of the Ouachita Mountains aquifer system potentiometric-surface map. The potentiometric-surface shows altitude at which the water level would have risen in tightly-cased wells and represents synoptic conditions during the summer of 2017. Contours were constructed from 59 water-level measurements measured in selected wells (locations in the well point dataset). Major streams and creeks were selected in the study area from the USGS National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey, 2017), and the spring point dataset with 18 spring altitudes calculated from 10-meter digital elevation model (DEM) data (U.S. Geological Survey, 2015; U.S. Geological Survey, 2016). After collecting, processing, and plotting the data, a potentiometric surface was generated using the interpolation method Topo to Raster in ArcMap 10.5 (Esri, 2017a). This tool is specifically designed for the creation of digital elevation models and imposes constraints that ensure a connected drainage structure and a correct representation of the surface from the provided contour data (Esri, 2017a). Once the raster surface was created, 50-ft contour interval were generated using Contour (Spatial Analyst), a spatial analyst tool (available through ArcGIS 3D Analyst toolbox) that creates a line-feature class of contours (isolines) from the raster surface (Esri, 2017b). The Topo to Raster and contouring done by ArcMap 10.5 is a rapid way to interpolate data, but computer programs do not account for hydrologic connections between groundwater and surface water. For this reason, some contours were manually adjusted based on topographical influence, a comparison with the potentiometric surface of Kresse and Hays (2009), and data-point water-level altitudes to more accurately represent the potentiometric surface. Select References: Esri, 2017a, How Topo to Raster works—Help | ArcGIS Desktop, accessed December 5, 2017, at ArcGIS Pro at http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/3d-analyst/how-topo-to-raster-works.htm. Esri, 2017b, Contour—Help | ArcGIS Desktop, accessed December 5, 2017, at ArcGIS Pro Raster Surface toolset at http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/3d-analyst/contour.htm. Kresse, T.M., and Hays, P.D., 2009, Geochemistry, Comparative Analysis, and Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Thermal Waters East of Hot Springs National Park, Arkansas, 2006-09: U.S. Geological Survey 2009–5263, 48 p., accessed November 28, 2017, at https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5263/. U.S. Geological Survey, 2015, USGS NED 1 arc-second n35w094 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid 2015, accessed December 5, 2017, at The National Map: Elevation at https://nationalmap.gov/elevation.html. U.S. Geological Survey, 2016, USGS NED 1 arc-second n35w093 1 x 1 degree ArcGrid 2016, accessed December 5, 2017, at The National Map: Elevation at https://nationalmap.gov/elevation.html.

Notice: this is not the latest Heat Island Severity image service.This layer contains the relative heat severity for every pixel for every city in the United States, including Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. This 30-meter raster was derived from Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summer of 2022, patched with data from 2021 where necessary.Federal statistics over a 30-year period show extreme heat is the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the United States. Extreme heat exacerbated by urban heat islands can lead to increased respiratory difficulties, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. These heat impacts significantly affect the most vulnerable—children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions.The purpose of this layer is to show where certain areas of cities are hotter than the average temperature for that same city as a whole. Severity is measured on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being a relatively mild heat area (slightly above the mean for the city), and 5 being a severe heat area (significantly above the mean for the city). The absolute heat above mean values are classified into these 5 classes using the Jenks Natural Breaks classification method, which seeks to reduce the variance within classes and maximize the variance between classes. Knowing where areas of high heat are located can help a city government plan for mitigation strategies.This dataset represents a snapshot in time. It will be updated yearly, but is static between updates. It does not take into account changes in heat during a single day, for example, from building shadows moving. The thermal readings detected by the Landsat 8 sensor are surface-level, whether that surface is the ground or the top of a building. Although there is strong correlation between surface temperature and air temperature, they are not the same. We believe that this is useful at the national level, and for cities that don’t have the ability to conduct their own hyper local temperature survey. Where local data is available, it may be more accurate than this dataset. Dataset SummaryThis dataset was developed using proprietary Python code developed at The Trust for Public Land, running on the Descartes Labs platform through the Descartes Labs API for Python. The Descartes Labs platform allows for extremely fast retrieval and processing of imagery, which makes it possible to produce heat island data for all cities in the United States in a relatively short amount of time.What can you do with this layer?This layer has query, identify, and export image services available. Since it is served as an image service, it is not necessary to download the data; the service itself is data that can be used directly in any Esri geoprocessing tool that accepts raster data as input.In order to click on the image service and see the raw pixel values in a map viewer, you must be signed in to ArcGIS Online, then Enable Pop-Ups and Configure Pop-Ups.Using the Urban Heat Island (UHI) Image ServicesThe data is made available as an image service. There is a processing template applied that supplies the yellow-to-red or blue-to-red color ramp, but once this processing template is removed (you can do this in ArcGIS Pro or ArcGIS Desktop, or in QGIS), the actual data values come through the service and can be used directly in a geoprocessing tool (for example, to extract an area of interest). Following are instructions for doing this in Pro.In ArcGIS Pro, in a Map view, in the Catalog window, click on Portal. In the Portal window, click on the far-right icon representing Living Atlas. Search on the acronyms “tpl” and “uhi”. The results returned will be the UHI image services. Right click on a result and select “Add to current map” from the context menu. When the image service is added to the map, right-click on it in the map view, and select Properties. In the Properties window, select Processing Templates. On the drop-down menu at the top of the window, the default Processing Template is either a yellow-to-red ramp or a blue-to-red ramp. Click the drop-down, and select “None”, then “OK”. Now you will have the actual pixel values displayed in the map, and available to any geoprocessing tool that takes a raster as input. Below is a screenshot of ArcGIS Pro with a UHI image service loaded, color ramp removed, and symbology changed back to a yellow-to-red ramp (a classified renderer can also be used): A typical operation at this point is to clip out your area of interest. To do this, add your polygon shapefile or feature class to the map view, and use the Clip Raster tool to export your area of interest as a geoTIFF raster (file extension ".tif"). In the environments tab for the Clip Raster tool, click the dropdown for "Extent" and select "Same as Layer:", and select the name of your polygon. If you then need to convert the output raster to a polygon shapefile or feature class, run the Raster to Polygon tool, and select "Value" as the field.Other Sources of Heat Island InformationPlease see these websites for valuable information on heat islands and to learn about exciting new heat island research being led by scientists across the country:EPA’s Heat Island Resource CenterDr. Ladd Keith, University of ArizonaDr. Ben McMahan, University of Arizona Dr. Jeremy Hoffman, Science Museum of Virginia Dr. Hunter Jones, NOAA Daphne Lundi, Senior Policy Advisor, NYC Mayor's Office of Recovery and ResiliencyDisclaimer/FeedbackWith nearly 14,000 cities represented, checking each city's heat island raster for quality assurance would be prohibitively time-consuming, so The Trust for Public Land checked a statistically significant sample size for data quality. The sample passed all quality checks, with about 98.5% of the output cities error-free, but there could be instances where the user finds errors in the data. These errors will most likely take the form of a line of discontinuity where there is no city boundary; this type of error is caused by large temperature differences in two adjacent Landsat scenes, so the discontinuity occurs along scene boundaries (see figure below). The Trust for Public Land would appreciate feedback on these errors so that version 2 of the national UHI dataset can be improved. Contact Dale.Watt@tpl.org with feedback.

Soil is the foundation of life on earth. More living things by weight live in the soil than upon it. It determines what crops we can grow, what structures we can build, what forests can take root.This layer contains the physical soil variable percent clay (clay).Within the subset of soil that is smaller than 2mm in size, also known as the fine earth portion, clay is defined as particles that are smaller than 0.002mm, making them only visible in an electron microscope. Clay soils contain low amounts of air, and water drains through them very slowly.This layer is a general, medium scale global predictive soil layer suitable for global mapping and decision support. In many places samples of soils do not exist so this map represents a prediction of what is most likely in that location. The predictions are made in six depth ranges by soilgrids.org, funded by ISRIC based in Wageningen, Netherlands.Each 250m pixel contains a value predicted for that area by soilgrids.org from best available data worldwide. Data for percent clay are provided at six depth ranges from the surface to 2 meters below the surface. Each variable and depth range may be accessed in the layer's multidimensional properties.Dataset SummaryPhenomenon Mapped: Proportion of clay particles (< 0.002 mm) in the fine earth fraction in g/100g (%)Cell Size: 250 metersPixel Type: 32 bit float, converted from online data that is 16 Bit Unsigned IntegerCoordinate System: Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere, projected via nearest neighbor from goode's homolosine land (250m)Extent: World land area except AntarcticaVisible Scale: All scales are visibleNumber of Columns and Rows: 160300, 100498Source: Soilgrids.orgPublication Date: May 2020Data from the soilgrids.org mean predictions for clay were used to create this layer. You may access the percent clay in one of six depth ranges. To select one choose the depth variable in the multidimensional selector in your map client.Mean depth (cm)Actual depth range of data-2.50-5cm depth range-105-15cm depth range-22.515-30cm depth range-4530-60cm depth range-8060-100cm depth range-150100-200cm depth rangeWhat can you do with this Layer?This layer is suitable for both visualization and analysis across the ArcGIS system. This layer can be combined with your data and other layers from the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Pro to create powerful web maps that can be used alone or in a story map or other application.Because this layer is part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World it is easy to add to your map: In ArcGIS Online, you can add this layer to a map by selecting Add then Browse Living Atlas Layers. A window will open. Type "world soils soilgrids" in the search box and browse to the layer. Select the layer then click Add to Map. In ArcGIS Pro, open a map and select Add Data from the Map Tab. Select Data at the top of the drop down menu. The Add Data dialog box will open on the left side of the box, expand Portal if necessary, then select Living Atlas. Type "world soils soilgrids" in the search box, browse to the layer then click OK.In ArcGIS Pro you can use the built-in raster functions or create your own to create custom extracts of the data. Imagery layers provide fast, powerful inputs to geoprocessing tools, models, or Python scripts in Pro.Online you can filter the layer to show subsets of the data using the filter button and the layer's built-in raster functions.This layer is part of the Living Atlas of the World that provides an easy way to explore the landscape layers and many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics.More information about soilgrids layersAnswers to many questions may be found at soilgrids.org (ISRIC) frequently asked questions (faq) page about the data.To make this layer, Esri reprojected the expected value of ISRIC soil grids from soilgrids' source projection (goode's land WKID 54052) to web mercator projection, nearest neighbor, to facilitate online mapping. The resolution in web mercator projection is the same as the original projection, 250m. But keep in mind that the original dataset has been reprojected to make this web mercator version.This multidimensional soil collection serves the mean or expected value for each soil variable as calculated by soilgrids.org. For all other distributions of the soil variable, be sure to download the data directly from soilgrids.org. The data are available in VRT format and may be converted to other image formats within ArcGIS Pro.Accessing this layer's companion uncertainty layerBecause data quality varies worldwide, the uncertainty of the predicted value varies worldwide. A companion uncertainty layer exists for this layer which you can use to qualify the values you see in this map for analysis. Choose a variable and depth in the multidimensional settings of your map client to access the companion uncertainty layer.

Notice: this is not the latest Heat Island Severity image service. For 2023 data, visit https://tpl.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=db5bdb0f0c8c4b85b8270ec67448a0b6. This layer contains the relative heat severity for every pixel for every city in the contiguous United States. This 30-meter raster was derived from Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summer of 2021, patched with data from 2020 where necessary.Federal statistics over a 30-year period show extreme heat is the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the United States. Extreme heat exacerbated by urban heat islands can lead to increased respiratory difficulties, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. These heat impacts significantly affect the most vulnerable—children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions.The purpose of this layer is to show where certain areas of cities are hotter than the average temperature for that same city as a whole. Severity is measured on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being a relatively mild heat area (slightly above the mean for the city), and 5 being a severe heat area (significantly above the mean for the city). The absolute heat above mean values are classified into these 5 classes using the Jenks Natural Breaks classification method, which seeks to reduce the variance within classes and maximize the variance between classes. Knowing where areas of high heat are located can help a city government plan for mitigation strategies.This dataset represents a snapshot in time. It will be updated yearly, but is static between updates. It does not take into account changes in heat during a single day, for example, from building shadows moving. The thermal readings detected by the Landsat 8 sensor are surface-level, whether that surface is the ground or the top of a building. Although there is strong correlation between surface temperature and air temperature, they are not the same. We believe that this is useful at the national level, and for cities that don’t have the ability to conduct their own hyper local temperature survey. Where local data is available, it may be more accurate than this dataset. Dataset SummaryThis dataset was developed using proprietary Python code developed at The Trust for Public Land, running on the Descartes Labs platform through the Descartes Labs API for Python. The Descartes Labs platform allows for extremely fast retrieval and processing of imagery, which makes it possible to produce heat island data for all cities in the United States in a relatively short amount of time.What can you do with this layer?This layer has query, identify, and export image services available. Since it is served as an image service, it is not necessary to download the data; the service itself is data that can be used directly in any Esri geoprocessing tool that accepts raster data as input.In order to click on the image service and see the raw pixel values in a map viewer, you must be signed in to ArcGIS Online, then Enable Pop-Ups and Configure Pop-Ups.Using the Urban Heat Island (UHI) Image ServicesThe data is made available as an image service. There is a processing template applied that supplies the yellow-to-red or blue-to-red color ramp, but once this processing template is removed (you can do this in ArcGIS Pro or ArcGIS Desktop, or in QGIS), the actual data values come through the service and can be used directly in a geoprocessing tool (for example, to extract an area of interest). Following are instructions for doing this in Pro.In ArcGIS Pro, in a Map view, in the Catalog window, click on Portal. In the Portal window, click on the far-right icon representing Living Atlas. Search on the acronyms “tpl” and “uhi”. The results returned will be the UHI image services. Right click on a result and select “Add to current map” from the context menu. When the image service is added to the map, right-click on it in the map view, and select Properties. In the Properties window, select Processing Templates. On the drop-down menu at the top of the window, the default Processing Template is either a yellow-to-red ramp or a blue-to-red ramp. Click the drop-down, and select “None”, then “OK”. Now you will have the actual pixel values displayed in the map, and available to any geoprocessing tool that takes a raster as input. Below is a screenshot of ArcGIS Pro with a UHI image service loaded, color ramp removed, and symbology changed back to a yellow-to-red ramp (a classified renderer can also be used): Other Sources of Heat Island InformationPlease see these websites for valuable information on heat islands and to learn about exciting new heat island research being led by scientists across the country:EPA’s Heat Island Resource CenterDr. Ladd Keith, University of ArizonaDr. Ben McMahan, University of Arizona Dr. Jeremy Hoffman, Science Museum of Virginia Dr. Hunter Jones, NOAA Daphne Lundi, Senior Policy Advisor, NYC Mayor's Office of Recovery and ResiliencyDisclaimer/FeedbackWith nearly 14,000 cities represented, checking each city's heat island raster for quality assurance would be prohibitively time-consuming, so The Trust for Public Land checked a statistically significant sample size for data quality. The sample passed all quality checks, with about 98.5% of the output cities error-free, but there could be instances where the user finds errors in the data. These errors will most likely take the form of a line of discontinuity where there is no city boundary; this type of error is caused by large temperature differences in two adjacent Landsat scenes, so the discontinuity occurs along scene boundaries (see figure below). The Trust for Public Land would appreciate feedback on these errors so that version 2 of the national UHI dataset can be improved. Contact Dale.Watt@tpl.org with feedback.

This layer contains the relative heat severity for every pixel for every city in the United States. This 30-meter raster was derived from Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summers of 2019 and 2020.Federal statistics over a 30-year period show extreme heat is the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the United States. Extreme heat exacerbated by urban heat islands can lead to increased respiratory difficulties, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. These heat impacts significantly affect the most vulnerable—children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions.The purpose of this layer is to show where certain areas of cities are hotter than the average temperature for that same city as a whole. Severity is measured on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being a relatively mild heat area (slightly above the mean for the city), and 5 being a severe heat area (significantly above the mean for the city). The absolute heat above mean values are classified into these 5 classes using the Jenks Natural Breaks classification method, which seeks to reduce the variance within classes and maximize the variance between classes. Knowing where areas of high heat are located can help a city government plan for mitigation strategies.This dataset represents a snapshot in time. It will be updated yearly, but is static between updates. It does not take into account changes in heat during a single day, for example, from building shadows moving. The thermal readings detected by the Landsat 8 sensor are surface-level, whether that surface is the ground or the top of a building. Although there is strong correlation between surface temperature and air temperature, they are not the same. We believe that this is useful at the national level, and for cities that don’t have the ability to conduct their own hyper local temperature survey. Where local data is available, it may be more accurate than this dataset. Dataset SummaryThis dataset was developed using proprietary Python code developed at The Trust for Public Land, running on the Descartes Labs platform through the Descartes Labs API for Python. The Descartes Labs platform allows for extremely fast retrieval and processing of imagery, which makes it possible to produce heat island data for all cities in the United States in a relatively short amount of time.What can you do with this layer?This layer has query, identify, and export image services available. Since it is served as an image service, it is not necessary to download the data; the service itself is data that can be used directly in any Esri geoprocessing tool that accepts raster data as input.In order to click on the image service and see the raw pixel values in a map viewer, you must be signed in to ArcGIS Online, then Enable Pop-Ups and Configure Pop-Ups.Using the Urban Heat Island (UHI) Image ServicesThe data is made available as an image service. There is a processing template applied that supplies the yellow-to-red or blue-to-red color ramp, but once this processing template is removed (you can do this in ArcGIS Pro or ArcGIS Desktop, or in QGIS), the actual data values come through the service and can be used directly in a geoprocessing tool (for example, to extract an area of interest). Following are instructions for doing this in Pro.In ArcGIS Pro, in a Map view, in the Catalog window, click on Portal. In the Portal window, click on the far-right icon representing Living Atlas. Search on the acronyms “tpl” and “uhi”. The results returned will be the UHI image services. Right click on a result and select “Add to current map” from the context menu. When the image service is added to the map, right-click on it in the map view, and select Properties. In the Properties window, select Processing Templates. On the drop-down menu at the top of the window, the default Processing Template is either a yellow-to-red ramp or a blue-to-red ramp. Click the drop-down, and select “None”, then “OK”. Now you will have the actual pixel values displayed in the map, and available to any geoprocessing tool that takes a raster as input. Below is a screenshot of ArcGIS Pro with a UHI image service loaded, color ramp removed, and symbology changed back to a yellow-to-red ramp (a classified renderer can also be used): Other Sources of Heat Island InformationPlease see these websites for valuable information on heat islands and to learn about exciting new heat island research being led by scientists across the country:EPA’s Heat Island Resource CenterDr. Ladd Keith, University of ArizonaDr. Ben McMahan, University of Arizona Dr. Jeremy Hoffman, Science Museum of Virginia Dr. Hunter Jones, NOAA Daphne Lundi, Senior Policy Advisor, NYC Mayor's Office of Recovery and ResiliencyDisclaimer/FeedbackWith nearly 14,000 cities represented, checking each city's heat island raster for quality assurance would be prohibitively time-consuming, so The Trust for Public Land checked a statistically significant sample size for data quality. The sample passed all quality checks, with about 98.5% of the output cities error-free, but there could be instances where the user finds errors in the data. These errors will most likely take the form of a line of discontinuity where there is no city boundary; this type of error is caused by large temperature differences in two adjacent Landsat scenes, so the discontinuity occurs along scene boundaries (see figure below). The Trust for Public Land would appreciate feedback on these errors so that version 2 of the national UHI dataset can be improved. Contact Pete.Aniello@tpl.org with feedback.Terms of UseYou understand and agree, and will advise any third party to whom you give any or all of the data, that The Trust for Public Land is neither responsible nor liable for any viruses or other contamination of your system arising from use of The Trust for Public Land’s data nor for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions arising out of the use of the data. The Trust for Public Land’s data is distributed and transmitted "as is" without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including without limitation, warranties of title or implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. The Trust for Public Land is not responsible for any claim of loss of profit or any special, direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, and/or punitive damages that may arise from the use of the data. If you or any person to whom you make the data available are downloading or using the data for any visual output, attribution for same will be given in the following format: "This [document, map, diagram, report, etc.] was produced using data, in whole or in part, provided by The Trust for Public Land."

AbstractThis layer shows where and how data gaps were filled for the Land tenure of Australia 2020–21. The data caveats highlight known uncertainties in land tenure for 2020-21 when reporting land tenure change in the Land tenure of Australia 2010-11 to 2020-21. The data was produced by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) within the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry as part of the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP). For more information see the dataset metadata at DOI: 10.25814/89rx-zs30.CurrencyDate modified: 31 October 2024Publication Date: 31 October 2024Modification frequency: As neededData ExtentCoordinate reference: WGS84 / Mercator Auxiliary SphereSpatial ExtentThe following spatial extent is provided in the Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA94).North: -9.995South: -44.005East: 154.004West: 112.505Source InformationData, Metadata, Maps and Interactive views are available from Land tenure of Australia 2010–11 to 2020–21 Land tenure of Australia 2010–11 to 2020–21 – Descriptive metadataThe data was obtained from the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry - Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES). ABARES is providing this data to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.Lineage StatementThe data caveat shows where no data voids for 2020–21 were filled by data from recent years, spatial filtering (despeckling), stock route or Tenure of Australia's forests (2018). For more information see the dataset metadata.Note: The Digital Atlas of Australia downloaded and created a copy of the source data in February 2025 that was suitable to be hosted through ArcGIS Image Server & Image Dedicated. A copy of the raster dataset was created with RGB fields as a colour map with Geoprocessing tools in ArcGIS Pro, and the raster dataset was re-projected from 1994 Australia Albers to WGS 1984 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere). This Web Mapping Service is for display purposes only. It is in Web Mercator projection and not suitable for deriving area statistics. For any analyses use the original dataset published in Albers projection.Table: Data caveat (DC) attribute for 2020-21 descriptions and meaningsDCDC_DESCMeaning-1OffshoreOffshore0No data/unresolvedNo data/unresolved tenure for this pixel. Captures where there is no tenure data or conflicting data sources; includes water features with unallocated tenure.1No data caveatNo known data caveats for this pixel.2No data in 2020–21, filled with 2015–16 dataThe pixel was populated with the same dataset for 2015–16 as no data was available for 2020–21. Change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.3No data in 2020-21, filled with 2010–11 dataThe pixel was populated with the same dataset for 2010–11 as no data was available for either 2020–21 or 2015–16. Change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.4No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with despeckling processNo data was available for both target periods, so a modelled approach was used to fill no data voids. Only no data voids <0.0002 degrees squared were filled using this method. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.5No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) aNo data was available for both target periods and filled from ABARES' Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) dataset. Latest date of information/currency is 30 June 2016. This was not applied to Inland water bodies in Tasmania which remain no data. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.6Updated lease with 2015–16 dataLeasehold pixel where lease type was defined by 2015–16 data. Data attribution improved, but change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.7Updated lease with 2010–11 dataLeasehold pixel where lease type was defined by 2010–11 data. Data attribution improved, but change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.8No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with stock route data bThe pixel was identified as a stock route and filled. This applies to areas of no data in Western Australia and Queensland. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.a Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) provides tenure for forests and land. LEASE is assigned to Other lease, with the other classes transferring to the equivalent class name if used to fill; Freehold, Nature conservation reserve, Multiple-use public forest or Other Crown land.b Stock routes assigned to Other Crown purposes.Data DictionaryField NameField DescriptionData TypeOID*Internal feature number that uniquely identifies each row.OIDValue (Service Pixel Value)Data caveat code. The code describes the data caveat related to using the cell for change detection. Refer to Tables A2.2-A2.4 of the dataset metadata.Integer, range: -1 to 8Count*Count of the number of raster cells in each class of Value.Integer countLabelLabel for data caveatTextDC_DESCDescription of data caveat code. Describes the data caveat related to using the cell for change detection. Refer to Tables A2.2-A2.4 of the dataset metadata.TextRed*Red RGB value for classification colours.IntegerGreen*Green RGB value for classification colours.IntegerBlue*Blue RGB value for classification colours.Integer* Denotes a hidden fieldContactAustralian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES), land_management@aff.gov.au.

Processed results from of surface grain size analysis of the sediment grab samples recovered as part of the Long Island Sound mapping project Phase II.Sediment grab samples have been taken in summer of 2017 and 2018 using a modified van Veen grab sampler. A sub-sample of the top two centimeter was taken and stored in a jar. Dried sub-samples samples were analyzed for grain size. First the samples were treated with hydroperoxide to remove organic components. Then the sample was passed through a series of standard sieves representing Phi sizes with the smallest being 64 µm. The content of each sieve was dried and weight. If there was sufficient fine material (< 64 µm), then this fine fraction was further analyzed using a Sedigraph system. The results of sieving and sedigraph analysis have been combined and the percentages for gravel, sand, silt and clay are determined following the Wentworth scale. In addition, other statistics including mean, median, skewness and standard deviation are calculated using the USGS GSSTAT program. The results of the LDEO/Queens College grain size analysis have been combined with data collected by the LISMARC group and analyzed by USGS. ArcGIS Pro empirical kriging has been used to interpolate values for gravel, sand, silt, clay, and mud percentages as well as for mean grain size onto a 50 m raster. The interpolated raster has been clipped to fit the extent of the phase 2 survey area. The final raster data are in GeoTiff format with UTM 18 N projection.Time period of content: 2017-08-01 to 2022-11-16Attribute accuracy: The attribute accuracy has not been determined. This raster dataset shown mainly the major trends and patterns of the value distribution in the Phase 2 study area.Completeness: The dataset is complete.Positional accuracy: The raster resolution is 50 m.Attributes:clay pct raster: Interpolated clay percent of the sample mass

Notice: this is not the latest Heat Island Severity image service. For 2023 data, visit https://tpl.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=db5bdb0f0c8c4b85b8270ec67448a0b6. This layer contains the relative heat severity for every pixel for every city in the United States. This 30-meter raster was derived from Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summers of 2018 and 2019.Federal statistics over a 30-year period show extreme heat is the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the United States. Extreme heat exacerbated by urban heat islands can lead to increased respiratory difficulties, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. These heat impacts significantly affect the most vulnerable—children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions.The purpose of this layer is to show where certain areas of cities are hotter than the average temperature for that same city as a whole. Severity is measured on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being a relatively mild heat area (slightly above the mean for the city), and 5 being a severe heat area (significantly above the mean for the city). The absolute heat above mean values are classified into these 5 classes using the Jenks Natural Breaks classification method, which seeks to reduce the variance within classes and maximize the variance between classes. Knowing where areas of high heat are located can help a city government plan for mitigation strategies.This dataset represents a snapshot in time. It will be updated yearly, but is static between updates. It does not take into account changes in heat during a single day, for example, from building shadows moving. The thermal readings detected by the Landsat 8 sensor are surface-level, whether that surface is the ground or the top of a building. Although there is strong correlation between surface temperature and air temperature, they are not the same. We believe that this is useful at the national level, and for cities that don’t have the ability to conduct their own hyper local temperature survey. Where local data is available, it may be more accurate than this dataset. Dataset SummaryThis dataset was developed using proprietary Python code developed at The Trust for Public Land, running on the Descartes Labs platform through the Descartes Labs API for Python. The Descartes Labs platform allows for extremely fast retrieval and processing of imagery, which makes it possible to produce heat island data for all cities in the United States in a relatively short amount of time.What can you do with this layer?This layer has query, identify, and export image services available. Since it is served as an image service, it is not necessary to download the data; the service itself is data that can be used directly in any Esri geoprocessing tool that accepts raster data as input.Using the Urban Heat Island (UHI) Image ServicesThe data is made available as an image service. There is a processing template applied that supplies the yellow-to-red or blue-to-red color ramp, but once this processing template is removed (you can do this in ArcGIS Pro or ArcGIS Desktop, or in QGIS), the actual data values come through the service and can be used directly in a geoprocessing tool (for example, to extract an area of interest). Following are instructions for doing this in Pro.In ArcGIS Pro, in a Map view, in the Catalog window, click on Portal. In the Portal window, click on the far-right icon representing Living Atlas. Search on the acronyms “tpl” and “uhi”. The results returned will be the UHI image services. Right click on a result and select “Add to current map” from the context menu. When the image service is added to the map, right-click on it in the map view, and select Properties. In the Properties window, select Processing Templates. On the drop-down menu at the top of the window, the default Processing Template is either a yellow-to-red ramp or a blue-to-red ramp. Click the drop-down, and select “None”, then “OK”. Now you will have the actual pixel values displayed in the map, and available to any geoprocessing tool that takes a raster as input. Below is a screenshot of ArcGIS Pro with a UHI image service loaded, color ramp removed, and symbology changed back to a yellow-to-red ramp (a classified renderer can also be used): Other Sources of Heat Island InformationPlease see these websites for valuable information on heat islands and to learn about exciting new heat island research being led by scientists across the country:EPA’s Heat Island Resource CenterDr. Ladd Keith, University of Arizona Dr. Ben McMahan, University of Arizona Dr. Jeremy Hoffman, Science Museum of Virginia Dr. Hunter Jones, NOAADaphne Lundi, Senior Policy Advisor, NYC Mayor's Office of Recovery and ResiliencyDisclaimer/FeedbackWith nearly 14,000 cities represented, checking each city's heat island raster for quality assurance would be prohibitively time-consuming, so The Trust for Public Land checked a statistically significant sample size for data quality. The sample passed all quality checks, with about 98.5% of the output cities error-free, but there could be instances where the user finds errors in the data. These errors will most likely take the form of a line of discontinuity where there is no city boundary; this type of error is caused by large temperature differences in two adjacent Landsat scenes, so the discontinuity occurs along scene boundaries (see figure below). The Trust for Public Land would appreciate feedback on these errors so that version 2 of the national UHI dataset can be improved. Contact Dale.Watt@tpl.org with feedback.

Processed results from of surface grain size analysis of the sediment grab samples recovered as part of the Long Island Sound mapping project Phase II.Sediment grab samples have been taken in summer of 2017 and 2018 using a modified van Veen grab sampler. A sub-sample of the top two centimeter was taken and stored in a jar. Dried sub-samples samples were analyzed for grain size. First the samples were treated with hydroperoxide to remove organic components. Then the sample was passed through a series of standard sieves representing Phi sizes with the smallest being 64 µm. The content of each sieve was dried and weight. If there was sufficient fine material (< 64 µm), then this fine fraction was further analyzed using a Sedigraph system. The results of sieving and sedigraph analysis have been combined and the percentages for gravel, sand, silt and clay are determined following the Wentworth scale. In addition, other statistics including mean, median, skewness and standard deviation are calculated using the USGS GSSTAT program. The results of the LDEO/Queens College grain size analysis have been combined with data collected by the LISMARC group and analyzed by USGS. ArcGIS Pro empirical kriging has been used to interpolate values for gravel, sand, silt, clay, and mud percentages as well as for mean grain size onto a 50 m raster. The interpolated raster has been clipped to fit the extent of the phase 2 survey area. The final raster data are in GeoTiff format with UTM 18 N projection.Time period of content: 2017-08-01 to 2022-11-16Attribute accuracy: The attribute accuracy has not been determined. This raster dataset shown mainly the major trends and patterns of the value distribution in the Phase 2 study area.Completeness: The dataset is complete.Positional accuracy: The raster resolution is 50 m.Attributes:gravel pct raster: Interpolated gravel percent of the sample mass

The Viewshed analysis layer is used to identify visible areas. You specify the places you are interested in, either from a file or interactively, and the Viewshed service combines this with Esri-curated elevation data to create output polygons of visible areas. Some questions you can answer with the Viewshed task include:What areas can I see from this location? What areas can see me?Can I see the proposed wind farm?What areas can be seen from the proposed fire tower?The maximum number of input features is 1000.Viewshed has the following optional parameters:Maximum Distance: The maximum distance to calculate the viewshed.Maximum Distance Units: The units for the Maximum Distance parameter. The default is meters.DEM Resolution: The source elevation data; the default is 90m resolution SRTM. Other options include 30m, 24m, 10m, and Finest.Observer Height: The height above the surface of the observer. The default value of 1.75 meters is an average height of a person. If you are looking from an elevation location such as an observation tower or a tall building, use that height instead.Observer Height Units: The units for the Observer Height parameter. The default is meters.Surface Offset: The height above the surface of the object you are trying to see. The default value is 0. If you are trying to see buildings or wind turbines add their height here.Surface Offset Units: The units for the Surface Offset parameter. The default is meters.Generalize Viewshed Polygons: Determine if the viewshed polygons are to be generalized or not. The viewshed calculation is based upon a raster elevation model which creates a result with stair-stepped edges. To create a more pleasing appearance, and improve performance, the default behavior is to generalize the polygons. This generalization will not change the accuracy of the result for any location more than one half of the DEM's resolution.By default, this tool currently works worldwide between 60 degrees north and 56 degrees south based on the 3 arc-second (approximately 90 meter) resolution SRTM dataset. Depending upon the DEM resolution pick by the user, different data sources will be used by the tool. For 24m, tool will use global dataset WorldDEM4Ortho (excluding the counties of Azerbaijan, DR Congo and Ukraine) 0.8 arc-second (approximately 24 meter) from Airbus Defence and Space GmbH. For 30m, tool will use 1 arc-second resolution data in North America (Canada, United States, and Mexico) from the USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED), SRTM DEM-S dataset from Geoscience Australia in Australia and SRTM data between 60 degrees north and 56 degrees south in the remaining parts of the world (Africa, South America, most of Europe and continental Asia, the East Indies, New Zealand, and islands of the western Pacific). For 10m, tool will use 1/3 arc-second resolution data in the continental United States from USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) and approximately 10 meter data covering Netherlands, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Austria, Spain, Japan Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Italy, Northern Ireland, Switzerland and Liechtenstein from various authoritative sources.To learn more, read the developer documentation for Viewshed or follow the Learn ArcGIS exercise called I Can See for Miles and Miles. To use this Geoprocessing service in ArcGIS Desktop 10.2.1 and higher, you can either connect to the Ready-to-Use Services, or create an ArcGIS Server connection. Connect to the Ready-to-Use Services by first signing in to your ArcGIS Online Organizational Account:Once you are signed in, the Ready-to-Use Services will appear in the Ready-to-Use Services folder or the Catalog window:If you would like to add a direct connection to the Elevation ArcGIS Server in ArcGIS for Desktop or ArcGIS Pro, use this URL to connect: https://elevation.arcgis.com/arcgis/services. You will also need to provide your account credentials. ArcGIS for Desktop:ArcGIS Pro:The ArcGIS help has additional information about how to do this:Learn how to make a ArcGIS Server Connection in ArcGIS Desktop. Learn more about using geoprocessing services in ArcGIS Desktop.This tool is part of a larger collection of elevation layers that you can use to perform a variety of mapping analysis tasks.

AbstractThis layer shows where and how data gaps were filled for the Land tenure of Australia 2010–11. The data caveats highlight known uncertainties in land tenure for 2010-11 when reporting land tenure change in the Land tenure of Australia 2010-11 to 2020-21. The data was produced by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) within the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry as part of the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP). For more information see the dataset metadata at DOI: 10.25814/89rx-zs30.CurrencyDate modified: 31 October 2024Publication Date: 31 October 2024Modification frequency: As neededData ExtentCoordinate reference: WGS84 / Mercator Auxiliary SphereSpatial Extent:The following spatial extent is provided in the Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA94).North: -9.995South: -44.005East: 154.004West: 112.505Source InformationData, Metadata, Maps and Interactive views are available from Land tenure of Australia 2010–11 to 2020–21 Land tenure of Australia 2010–11 to 2020–21 – Descriptive metadataThe data was obtained from Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry - Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES). ABARES is providing this data to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.Lineage StatementThis data caveat shows where no data voids for 2020–21 were filled by data from recent years, spatial filtering (despeckling), stock routes or Tenure of Australia's Forest (2018). For more information see the dataset metadata.Note: The Digital Atlas of Australia downloaded and created a copy of the source data in February 2025 that was suitable to be hosted through ArcGIS Image Server & Image Dedicated. A copy of the raster dataset was created with RGB fields as a colour map with Geoprocessing tools in ArcGIS Pro, and the raster dataset was re-projected from 1994 Australia Albers to WGS 1984 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere). This Web Mapping Service is for display purposes only. It is in Web Mercator projection and not suitable for deriving area statistics. For any analyses use the original dataset published in Albers projection.Table: Data caveat (DC) attribute for 2010-11 descriptions and meaningsDCDC_DESCMeaning-1OffshoreOffshore0No data/unresolvedNo data/unresolved tenure for this pixel. Captures where there is no tenure data or conflicting data sources; includes water features with unallocated tenure.1No data caveatNo known data caveats for this pixel.2No data in 2010–11, filled with 2015–16 dataThe pixel was populated with the same dataset for 2015–16 as no data was available for 2010–11. Change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.3No data in 2010–11, filled with 2020–21 dataThe pixel was populated with the same dataset for 2020–21 as no data was available for either 2010–11 or 2015–16. Change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.4No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with despeckling processNo data was available for both target periods, so a modelled approach was used to fill no data voids. Only no data voids <0.0002 degrees squared were filled using this method. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.5No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) aNo data was available for both target periods and filled from ABARES' Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) dataset. Latest date of information/currency is 30 June 2016. This was not applied to Inland water bodies in Tasmania which remain no data. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.6Updated lease with 2015–16 dataLeasehold pixel where lease type was defined by 2015–16 data. Data attribution improved, but change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.7Updated lease with 2020–21 dataLeasehold pixel where lease type was defined by 2020–21 data. Data attribution improved, but change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.8No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with stock route data bThe pixel was identified as a stock route and filled. This applies to areas of no data in Western Australia and Queensland. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.a Tenure of Australia's forests (2018) provides tenure for forests and land. LEASE is assigned to Other lease, with the other classes transferring to the equivalent class name if used to fill; Freehold, Nature conversation reserve, Multiple-use public forest or Other Crown land.b Stock routes assigned to Other Crown purposes.Data DictionaryField NameField DescriptionData TypeOID *Internal feature number that uniquely identifies each row.OIDValue (Service Pixel Value)Data caveat code. The code describes the data caveat related to using the cell for change detection. Refer to Tables A2.2-A2.4 of the dataset metadata.Integer, range: -1 to 8Count *Count of the number of raster cells in each class of Value.Integer countLabelLabel for data caveatTextDC_DESCDescription of data caveat code. Describes the data caveat related to using the cell for change detection. Refer to Tables A2.2-A2.4 of the dataset metadata.TextRed *Red RGB value for classification colours.IntegerGreen *Green RGB value for classification colours.IntegerBlue Blue RGB value for classification colours.Integer Denotes a hidden field.ContactAustralian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES), land_management@aff.gov.au.

Important Note: This item is in mature support as of June 2024 and will be retired in December 2026. A new version of this item is available for your use. Esri recommends updating your maps and apps to use the new version.The Protected Areas Database of the United States provides a comprehensive map of lands protected by government agencies and private land owners. This database combines federal lands with information on state and local government lands and conservation easements on private lands to create a powerful resource for land-use planning.Dataset SummaryPhenomenon Mapped: Areas mapped in the Protected Areas Data base of the United States (GAP Status 1-4)Units: MetersCell Size: 30.92208102 metersSource Type: ThematicPixel Type: 8-bit unsigned integerData Coordinate System: WGS 1984Mosaic Projection: Web Mercator Auxiliary SphereExtent: 50 United States plus Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa.Source: USGS National Gap Analysis Program PAD-US version 3.0Publication Date: July 2022ArcGIS Server URL: https://landscape10.arcgis.com/arcgis/This layer displays lands mapped in Protected Areas Database of the United States version 3.0 created by the USGS National Gap Analysis Program. This layer displays all four GAP Status classes: GAP Status 1 - Areas managed for biodiversity where natural disturbances are allowed to proceedGAP Status 2 - Areas managed for biodiversity where natural disturbance is suppressedGAP Status 3 - Areas protected from land cover conversion but subject to extractive uses such as logging and miningGAP Status 4 - Areas with no known mandate for protectionThe source data for this layer are available here. A feature layer published from this dataset is also available. The polygon vector layer was converted to raster layers using the Polygon to Raster Tool using the National Elevation Dataset 1 arc second product as a snap raster.The service behind this layer was published with 8 functions allowing the user to select different views of the service. Other layers created from this service using functions include:USA Protected AreasUSA Protected from Land Cover ConversionUSA Unprotected AreasUSA Protected Areas - Gap Status 1USA Protected Areas - Gap Status 2USA Protected Areas - Gap Status 3USA Protected Areas - Gap Status 4What can you do with this Layer? This layer is suitable for both visualization and analysis across the ArcGIS system. This layer can be combined with your data and other layers from the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World in ArcGIS Online and ArcGIS Pro to create powerful web maps that can be used alone or in a story map or other application.Because this layer is part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World it is easy to add to your map:In ArcGIS Online, you can add this layer to a map by selecting Add then Browse Living Atlas Layers. A window will open. Type "Protected Areas" in the search box and browse to the layer. Select the layer then click Add to Map.In ArcGIS Pro, open a map and select Add Data from the Map Tab. Select Data at the top of the drop down menu. The Add Data dialog box will open on the left side of the box, expand Portal if necessary, then select Living Atlas. Type "Protected Areas" in the search box, browse to the layer then click OK.In ArcGIS Pro you can use the built-in raster functions to create custom extracts of the data. Imagery layers provide fast, powerful inputs to geoprocessing tools, models, or Python scripts in Pro.The ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World provides an easy way to explore many other beautiful and authoritative maps on hundreds of topics like this one.

AbstractThis layer shows where and how data gaps were filled for the Land tenure of Australia 2015–16. The data caveats highlight known uncertainties in land tenure for 2015-16 when reporting land tenure change in the Land tenure of Australia 2010-11 to 2020-21. The data was produced by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) within the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry as part of the Australian Collaborative Land Use and Management Program (ACLUMP). For more information see the dataset metadata at DOI: 10.25814/89rx-zs30.CurrencyDate modified: 31 October 2024Publication Date: 31 October 2024Modification frequency: As neededData ExtentThe following spatial extent is provided in the Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA94).Coordinate reference: WGS84 / Mercator Auxiliary SphereSpatial ExtentNorth: -9.995South: -44.005East: 154.004West: 112.505Source InformationData, Metadata, Maps and Interactive views are available from Land tenure of Australia 2010–11 to 2020–21 Land tenure of Australia 2010–11 to 2020–21 – Descriptive metadataThe data was obtained from the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry - Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES). ABARES is providing this data to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.Lineage StatementThe data caveat shows where data voids for 2015–16 were filled by data from recent years, spatial filtering (despeckling), stock routes or Tenure of Australia's forests (2018). For more information see the dataset metadata.Note: The Digital Atlas of Australia downloaded and created a copy of the source data in February 2025 that was suitable to be hosted through ArcGIS Image Server & Image Dedicated. A copy of the raster dataset was created with RGB fields as a colour map with Geoprocessing tools in ArcGIS Pro, and the raster dataset was re-projected from 1994 Australia Albers to WGS 1984 Web Mercator (Auxiliary Sphere). This Web Mapping Service is for display purposes only. It is in Web Mercator projection and not suitable for deriving area statistics. For any analyses use the original dataset published in Albers projection.Table: Data caveat (DC) attribute for 2015-16 descriptions and meaningsDCDC_DESCMeaning-1OffshoreOffshore0No data/unresolvedNo data/unresolved tenure for this pixel. Captures where there is no tenure data or conflicting data sources; includes water features with unallocated tenure.1No data caveatNo known data caveats for this pixel.2No data in 2015–16, filled with 2010–11 dataThe pixel was populated with the same dataset for 2010–11 as no data was available for 2015–16. Change detection may be limited due to data availability issues3No data in 2015–16, filled with 2020–21 dataThe pixel was populated with the same dataset for 2020–21 as no data was available for either 2015–16 or 2010–11. Change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.4No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with despeckling processNo data was available for both target periods, so a modelled approach was used to fill no data voids. Only no data voids <0.0002 degrees squared were filled using this method. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.5No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) aNo data was available for both target periods and filled from ABARES" Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) dataset. Latest date of information/currency is 30 June 2016. This was not applied to Inland water bodies in Tasmania which remain no data. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.6Updated lease with 2010–11 dataLeasehold pixel where lease type was defined by 2010–11 data. Data attribution improved, but change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.7Updated lease with 2020–21 dataLeasehold pixel where lease type was defined by 2020–21 data. Data attribution improved, but change detection may be limited due to data availability issues.8No data in the 10 years prior or post, filled with stock route data bThe pixel was identified as a stock route and filled. This applies to areas of no data in Western Australia and Queensland. Change detection may be limited due to data availability and modelling issues.a Tenure of Australia’s forests (2018) provides tenure for forests and land. LEASE is assigned to Other lease, with the other classes transferring to the equivalent class name if used to fill; Freehold, Nature conservation reserve, Multiple-use public forest or Other Crown land.b Stock routes assigned to Other Crown purposes.Data DictionaryField NameField DescriptionData TypeOID *Internal feature number that uniquely identifies each row.OIDValue (Service Pixel Value)Data caveat code. The code describes the data caveat related to using the cell for change detection. Refer to Tables A2.2-A2.4 of the dataset metadata.Integer, range: -1 to 8Count *Count of the number of raster cells in each class of Value.Integer countLabelLabel for data caveatTextDC_DESCDescription of data caveat code. Describes the data caveat related to using the cell for change detection. Refer to Tables A2.2-A2.4TextRed *Red RGB value for classification colours.IntegerGreen *Green RGB value for classification colours.IntegerBlue *Blue RGB value for classification colours.IntegerContactAustralian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES), land_management@aff.gov.au.

Processed results from of surface carbon and nitrogen analysis of the sediment grab samples recovered as part of the Long Island Sound Seafloor Habitat Mapping Initiative Phase II Project.Sediment grab samples have been taken in summer of 2017 and 2018 using a modified van Veen grab sampler. A sub-sample of the top two centimeter was taken and stored in a jar. Dried and homogenized splits of the samples were sent to the Cornell Isotope Laboratory (COIL) to be analyzed for carbon and nitrogen concentrations as well as stable isotopic compositions. Total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), and δ15N were determined on an aliquot of untreated, dried homogenized sediments. In order to accurately determine total organic carbon (TOC) and δ13C, removal of carbonate is necessary. This was achieved through sequential treatments of the sediments with dilute hydrochloric acid until no bubbling was observed. The acidified sediments were then rinsed in deionized water and re-dried. In the Cornell Lab the samples were analyzed using a NC2500 elemental analyzer interfaced with a Thermo Delta V isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). ArcGIS Pro empirical kriging has been used to interpolate values for organic carbon, total carbon, nitrogen, d13C and d15N isotope content onto a 50 m raster. The interpolated raster has been clipped to fit the extent of the phase 2 survey area. The final raster data are in GeoTiff format with UTM 18 N projection.Time period of content: 2017-08-01 to 2022-11-16Attribute accuracy: The attribute accuracy has not been determined. This raster dataset shown mainly the major trends and patterns of the value distribution in the Phase 2 study area.Completeness: The dataset is complete.Positional accuracy: The raster resolution is 50 m.Attributes: carbon_total_pct raster: Interpolated total carbon content

This layer contains the relative heat severity for every pixel for every city in the United States. This 30-meter raster was derived from Landsat 8 imagery band 10 (ground-level thermal sensor) from the summers of 2018 and 2019.Federal statistics over a 30-year period show extreme heat is the leading cause of weather-related deaths in the United States. Extreme heat exacerbated by urban heat islands can lead to increased respiratory difficulties, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. These heat impacts significantly affect the most vulnerable—children, the elderly, and those with preexisting conditions.The purpose of this layer is to show where certain areas of cities are hotter than the average temperature for that same city as a whole. Severity is measured on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being a relatively mild heat area (slightly above the mean for the city), and 5 being a severe heat area (significantly above the mean for the city). The absolute heat above mean values are classified into these 5 classes using the Jenks Natural Breaks classification method, which seeks to reduce the variance within classes and maximize the variance between classes. Knowing where areas of high heat are located can help a city government plan for mitigation strategies.This dataset represents a snapshot in time. It will be updated yearly, but is static between updates. It does not take into account changes in heat during a single day, for example, from building shadows moving. The thermal readings detected by the Landsat 8 sensor are surface-level, whether that surface is the ground or the top of a building. Although there is strong correlation between surface temperature and air temperature, they are not the same. We believe that this is useful at the national level, and for cities that don’t have the ability to conduct their own hyper local temperature survey. Where local data is available, it may be more accurate than this dataset. Dataset SummaryThis dataset was developed using proprietary Python code developed at The Trust for Public Land, running on the Descartes Labs platform through the Descartes Labs API for Python. The Descartes Labs platform allows for extremely fast retrieval and processing of imagery, which makes it possible to produce heat island data for all cities in the United States in a relatively short amount of time.What can you do with this layer?This layer has query, identify, and export image services available. Since it is served as an image service, it is not necessary to download the data; the service itself is data that can be used directly in any Esri geoprocessing tool that accepts raster data as input.Using the Urban Heat Island (UHI) Image ServicesThe data is made available as an image service. There is a processing template applied that supplies the yellow-to-red or blue-to-red color ramp, but once this processing template is removed (you can do this in ArcGIS Pro or ArcGIS Desktop, or in QGIS), the actual data values come through the service and can be used directly in a geoprocessing tool (for example, to extract an area of interest). Following are instructions for doing this in Pro.In ArcGIS Pro, in a Map view, in the Catalog window, click on Portal. In the Portal window, click on the far-right icon representing Living Atlas. Search on the acronyms “tpl” and “uhi”. The results returned will be the UHI image services. Right click on a result and select “Add to current map” from the context menu. When the image service is added to the map, right-click on it in the map view, and select Properties. In the Properties window, select Processing Templates. On the drop-down menu at the top of the window, the default Processing Template is either a yellow-to-red ramp or a blue-to-red ramp. Click the drop-down, and select “None”, then “OK”. Now you will have the actual pixel values displayed in the map, and available to any geoprocessing tool that takes a raster as input. Below is a screenshot of ArcGIS Pro with a UHI image service loaded, color ramp removed, and symbology changed back to a yellow-to-red ramp (a classified renderer can also be used): Other Sources of Heat Island InformationPlease see these websites for valuable information on heat islands and to learn about exciting new heat island research being led by scientists across the country:EPA’s Heat Island Resource CenterDr. Ladd Keith, University of Arizona Dr. Ben McMahan, University of Arizona Dr. Jeremy Hoffman, Science Museum of Virginia Dr. Hunter Jones, NOAADaphne Lundi, Senior Policy Advisor, NYC Mayor's Office of Recovery and ResiliencyDisclaimer/FeedbackWith nearly 14,000 cities represented, checking each city's heat island raster for quality assurance would be prohibitively time-consuming, so The Trust for Public Land checked a statistically significant sample size for data quality. The sample passed all quality checks, with about 98.5% of the output cities error-free, but there could be instances where the user finds errors in the data. These errors will most likely take the form of a line of discontinuity where there is no city boundary; this type of error is caused by large temperature differences in two adjacent Landsat scenes, so the discontinuity occurs along scene boundaries (see figure below). The Trust for Public Land would appreciate feedback on these errors so that version 2 of the national UHI dataset can be improved. Contact Pete.Aniello@tpl.org with feedback.

Processed results from of surface x-ray florescence (XRF) analysis of the sediment grab samples recovered as part of the Long Island Sound mapping project Phase II. Sediment grab samples have been collected in the summers of 2017 and 2018 using a modified van Veen grab sampler. A subsample of the top two centimeter was taken for further lab analysis. Dried and homogenized splits of the samples were analyzed for chemical composition using an Innov-X Alpha series 4000 XRF (Innov-X Systems, Woburn, MA). The results of the measurements are presented as ppm. The XRF analytical protocol included the following elements: P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn As, Se, Br, Rb, Sr, Zr, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb, I, Ba, Hg, Pb, Bi, Th, and U. However, only Cl, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, As, Br, Rb, Sr, Zr and Pb were consistently present at levels above background detection in surficial sediments collected in the LIS Phase II area. ArcGIS Pro empirical kriging has been used to interpolate values for selected elements onto a 50 m raster. The interpolated raster has been clipped to fit the extent of the phase 2 survey area. The final raster data are in GeoTiff format with UTM 18 N projection.Time period of content: 2017-08-01 to 2022-11-16Attribute accuracy: The attribute accuracy has not been determined. This raster dataset shown mainly the major trends and patterns of the value distribution in the Phase 2 study area.Completeness: The dataset is complete.Positional accuracy: The raster resolution is 50 m.Attributes: XRF Ca raster: Interpolated Calcium (Ca) distribution (in ppm)

This layer is a time series of the annual ESA CCI (Climate Change Initiative) land cover maps of the world. ESA has produced land cover maps for the years 1992-2020. These are available at the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative website.Time Extent: 1992-2020Cell Size: 300 meter Source Type: ThematicPixel Type: 8 Bit UnsignedData Projection: GCS WGS84Mosaic Projection: Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere Extent: GlobalSource: ESA Climate Change InitiativeUpdate Cycle: Annual until 2020, no updates thereafterWhat can you do with this layer? This layer may be added to ArcGIS Online maps and applications and shown in a time series to watch a "time lapse" view of land cover change since 1992 for any part of the world. The same behavior exists when the layer is added to ArcGIS Pro. In addition to displaying all layers in a series, this layer may be queried so that only one year is displayed in a map. This layer can be used in analysis. For example, the layer may be added to ArcGIS Pro with a query set to display just one year. Then, an area count of land cover types may be produced for a feature dataset using the zonal statistics tool. Statistics may be compared with the statistics from other years to show a trend. To sum up area by land cover using this service, or any other analysis, be sure to use an equal area projection, such as Albers or Equal Earth. Different Classifications Available to Map Five processing templates are included in this layer. The processing templates may be used to display a smaller set of land cover classes.Cartographic Renderer (Default Template)Displays all ESA CCI land cover classes.*Forested lands TemplateThe forested lands template shows only forested lands (classes 50-90).Urban Lands TemplateThe urban lands template shows only urban areas (class 190).Converted Lands TemplateThe converted lands template shows only urban lands and lands converted to agriculture (classes 10-40 and 190).Simplified RendererDisplays the map in ten simple classes which match the ten simplified classes used in 2050 Land Cover projections from Clark University.Any of these variables can be displayed or analyzed by selecting their processing template. In ArcGIS Online, select the Image Display Options on the layer. Then pull down the list of variables from the Renderer options. Click Apply and Close. In ArcGIS Pro, go into the Layer Properties. Select Processing Templates from the left hand menu. From the Processing Template pull down menu, select the variable to display. Using Time By default, the map will display as a time series animation, one year per frame. A time slider will appear when you add this layer to your map. To see the most current data, move the time slider until you see the most current year. In addition to displaying the past quarter century of land cover maps as an animation, this time series can also display just one year of data by use of a definition query. For a step by step example using ArcGIS Pro on how to display just one year of this layer, as well as to compare one year to another, see the blog called Calculating Impervious Surface Change. Hierarchical ClassificationLand cover types are defined using the land cover classification (LCCS) developed by the United Nations, FAO. It is designed to be as compatible as possible with other products, namely GLCC2000, GlobCover 2005 and 2009. This is a heirarchical classification system. For example, class 60 means "closed to open" canopy broadleaved deciduous tree cover. But in some places a more specific type of broadleaved deciduous tree cover may be available. In that case, a more specific code 61 or 62 may be used which specifies "open" (61) or "closed" (62) cover. Land Cover Processing To provide consistency over time, these maps are produced from baseline land cover maps, and are revised for changes each year depending on the best available satellite data from each period in time. These revisions were made from AVHRR 1km time series from 1992 to 1999, SPOT-VGT time series between 1999 and 2013, and PROBA-V data for years 2013, 2014 and 2015. When MERIS FR or PROBA-V time series are available, changes detected at 1 km are re-mapped at 300 m. The last step consists in back- and up-dating the 10-year baseline LC map to produce the 24 annual LC maps from 1992 to 2015. Source data The datasets behind this layer were extracted from NetCDF files and TIFF files produced by ESA. Years 1992-2015 were acquired from ESA CCI LC version 2.0.7 in TIFF format, and years 2016-2018 were acquired from version 2.1.1 in NetCDF format. These are downloadable from ESA with an account, after agreeing to their terms of use. https://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php CitationESA. Land Cover CCI Product User Guide Version 2. Tech. Rep. (2017). Available at: maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download/ESACCI-LC-Ph2-PUGv2_2.0.pdfMore technical documentation on the source datasets is available here:https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/satellite-land-cover?tab=doc*Index of all classes in this layer:10 Cropland, rainfed11 Herbaceous cover12 Tree or shrub cover20 Cropland, irrigated or post-flooding30 Mosaic cropland (>50%) / natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<50%)40 Mosaic natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (>50%) / cropland (<50%) 50 Tree cover, broadleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%)60 Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%)61 Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed (>40%)62 Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, open (15-40%)70 Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%)71 Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed (>40%)72 Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, open (15-40%)80 Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%)81 Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed (>40%)82 Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, open (15-40%)90 Tree cover, mixed leaf type (broadleaved and needleleaved)100 Mosaic tree and shrub (>50%) / herbaceous cover (<50%)110 Mosaic herbaceous cover (>50%) / tree and shrub (<50%)120 Shrubland121 Shrubland evergreen122 Shrubland deciduous130 Grassland140 Lichens and mosses150 Sparse vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<15%)151 Sparse tree (<15%)152 Sparse shrub (<15%)153 Sparse herbaceous cover (<15%)160 Tree cover, flooded, fresh or brakish water170 Tree cover, flooded, saline water180 Shrub or herbaceous cover, flooded, fresh/saline/brakish water190 Urban areas200 Bare areas201 Consolidated bare areas202 Unconsolidated bare areas210 Water bodies

Processed results from of surface carbon and nitrogen analysis of the sediment grab samples recovered as part of the Long Island Sound mapping project Phase II.Sediment grab samples have been taken in summer of 2017 and 2018 using a modified van Veen grab sampler. A sub-sample of the top two centimeter was taken and stored in a jar. Dried and homogenized splits of the samples were sent to the Cornell Isotope Laboratory (COIL) to be analyzed for carbon and nitrogen concentrations as well as stable isotopic compositions. Total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), and δ15N were determined on an aliquot of untreated, dried homogenized sediments. In order to accurately determine total organic carbon (TOC) and δ13C, removal of carbonate is necessary. This was achieved through sequential treatments of the sediments with dilute hydrochloric acid until no bubbling was observed. The acidified sediments were then rinsed in deionized water and re-dried. In the Cornell Lab the samples were analyzed using a NC2500 elemental analyzer interfaced with a Thermo Delta V isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). ArcGIS Pro empirical kriging has been used to interpolate values for organic carbon, total carbon, nitrogen, d13C and d15N isotope content onto a 50 m raster. The interpolated raster has been clipped to fit the extent of the phase 2 survey area. The final raster data are in GeoTiff format with UTM 18 N projection.Time period of content: 2017-08-01 to 2022-11-16Attribute accuracy: The attribute accuracy has not been determined. This raster dataset shown mainly the major trends and patterns of the value distribution in the Phase 2 study area.Completeness: The dataset is complete.Positional accuracy: The raster resolution is 50 m.Attributes: d15N raster: Interpolated d15N content