Raw data outputs 1-18 Raw data output 1. Differentially expressed genes in AML CSCs compared with GTCs as well as in TCGA AML cancer samples compared with normal ones. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and TCGA data analysis. Raw data output 2. Commonly and uniquely differentially expressed genes in AML CSC/GTC microarray and TCGA bulk RNA-seq datasets. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and TCGA data analysis. Raw data output 3. Common differentially expressed genes between training and test set samples the microarray dataset. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray data analysis. Raw data output 4. Detailed information on the samples of the breast cancer microarray dataset (GSE52327) used in this study. Raw data output 5. Differentially expressed genes in breast CSCs compared with GTCs as well as in TCGA BRCA cancer samples compared with normal ones. Raw data output 6. Commonly and uniquely differentially expressed genes in breast cancer CSC/GTC microarray and TCGA BRCA bulk RNA-seq datasets. This data was generated based on the results of breast cancer microarray and TCGA BRCA data analysis. CSC, and GTC are abbreviations of cancer stem cell, and general tumor cell, respectively. Raw data output 7. Differential and common co-expression and protein-protein interaction of genes between CSC and GTC samples. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and STRING database-based protein-protein interaction data analysis. CSC, and GTC are abbreviations of cancer stem cell, and general tumor cell, respectively. Raw data output 8. Differentially expressed genes between AML dormant and active CSCs. This data was generated based on the results of AML scRNA-seq data analysis. Raw data output 9. Uniquely expressed genes in dormant or active AML CSCs. This data was generated based on the results of AML scRNA-seq data analysis. Raw data output 10. Intersections between the targeting transcription factors of AML key CSC genes and differentially expressed genes between AML CSCs vs GTCs and between dormant and active AML CSCs or the uniquely expressed genes in either class of CSCs. Raw data output 11. Targeting desirableness score of AML key CSC genes and their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 12. CSC-specific targeting desirableness score of AML key CSC genes and their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 13. The protein-protein interactions between AML key CSC genes with themselves and their targeting transcription factors. This data was generated based on the results of AML microarray and STRING database-based protein-protein interaction data analysis. Raw data output 14. The previously confirmed associations of genes having the highest targeting desirableness and CSC-specific targeting desirableness scores with AML or other cancers’ (stem) cells as well as hematopoietic stem cells. These data were generated based on a PubMed database-based literature mining. Raw data output 15. Drug score of available drugs and bioactive small molecules targeting AML key CSC genes and/or their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 16. CSC-specific drug score of available drugs and bioactive small molecules targeting AML key CSC genes and/or their targeting transcription factors. These scores were generated based on an in-house scoring function described in the Methods section. Raw data output 17. Candidate drugs for experimental validation. These drugs were selected based on their respective (CSC-specific) drug scores. CSC is the abbreviation of cancer stem cell. Raw data output 18. Detailed information on the samples of the AML microarray dataset GSE30375 used in this study.

sheet1 raw data sheet 2 base line sheet3 subgroup raw data sheet4 results of statistical analysis

The link for the Excel project to download can be found on GitHub here. It includes the raw data, Pivot Tables, and an interactive dashboard with Pivot Charts and Slicers. The project also includes business questions and the formulas I used to answer. The image below is included for ease. https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F12904052%2F61e460b5f6a1fa73cfaaa33aa8107bd5%2FBusinessQuestions.png?generation=1686190703261971&alt=media" alt=""> The link for the Tableau adjusted dashboard can be found here.

A screenshot of the interactive Excel dashboard is also included below for ease. https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F12904052%2Fe581f1fce8afc732f7823904da9e4cce%2FScooter%20Dashboard%20Image.png?generation=1686190815608343&alt=media" alt="">

Sheet 1 (Raw-Data): The raw data of the study is provided, presenting the tagging results for the used measures described in the paper. For each subject, it includes multiple columns: A. a sequential student ID B an ID that defines a random group label and the notation C. the used notation: user Story or use Cases D. the case they were assigned to: IFA, Sim, or Hos E. the subject's exam grade (total points out of 100). Empty cells mean that the subject did not take the first exam F. a categorical representation of the grade L/M/H, where H is greater or equal to 80, M is between 65 included and 80 excluded, L otherwise G. the total number of classes in the student's conceptual model H. the total number of relationships in the student's conceptual model I. the total number of classes in the expert's conceptual model J. the total number of relationships in the expert's conceptual model K-O. the total number of encountered situations of alignment, wrong representation, system-oriented, omitted, missing (see tagging scheme below) P. the researchers' judgement on how well the derivation process explanation was explained by the student: well explained (a systematic mapping that can be easily reproduced), partially explained (vague indication of the mapping ), or not present.

Tagging scheme:
Aligned (AL) - A concept is represented as a class in both models, either

with the same name or using synonyms or clearly linkable names; Wrongly represented (WR) - A class in the domain expert model is incorrectly represented in the student model, either (i) via an attribute, method, or relationship rather than class, or (ii) using a generic term (e.g., user'' instead ofurban planner''); System-oriented (SO) - A class in CM-Stud that denotes a technical implementation aspect, e.g., access control. Classes that represent legacy system or the system under design (portal, simulator) are legitimate; Omitted (OM) - A class in CM-Expert that does not appear in any way in CM-Stud; Missing (MI) - A class in CM-Stud that does not appear in any way in CM-Expert.

All the calculations and information provided in the following sheets

originate from that raw data.

Sheet 2 (Descriptive-Stats): Shows a summary of statistics from the data collection,

including the number of subjects per case, per notation, per process derivation rigor category, and per exam grade category.

Sheet 3 (Size-Ratio):

The number of classes within the student model divided by the number of classes within the expert model is calculated (describing the size ratio). We provide box plots to allow a visual comparison of the shape of the distribution, its central value, and its variability for each group (by case, notation, process, and exam grade) . The primary focus in this study is on the number of classes. However, we also provided the size ratio for the number of relationships between student and expert model.

Sheet 4 (Overall):

Provides an overview of all subjects regarding the encountered situations, completeness, and correctness, respectively. Correctness is defined as the ratio of classes in a student model that is fully aligned with the classes in the corresponding expert model. It is calculated by dividing the number of aligned concepts (AL) by the sum of the number of aligned concepts (AL), omitted concepts (OM), system-oriented concepts (SO), and wrong representations (WR). Completeness on the other hand, is defined as the ratio of classes in a student model that are correctly or incorrectly represented over the number of classes in the expert model. Completeness is calculated by dividing the sum of aligned concepts (AL) and wrong representations (WR) by the sum of the number of aligned concepts (AL), wrong representations (WR) and omitted concepts (OM). The overview is complemented with general diverging stacked bar charts that illustrate correctness and completeness.

For sheet 4 as well as for the following four sheets, diverging stacked bar

charts are provided to visualize the effect of each of the independent and mediated variables. The charts are based on the relative numbers of encountered situations for each student. In addition, a "Buffer" is calculated witch solely serves the purpose of constructing the diverging stacked bar charts in Excel. Finally, at the bottom of each sheet, the significance (T-test) and effect size (Hedges' g) for both completeness and correctness are provided. Hedges' g was calculated with an online tool: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. The independent and moderating variables can be found as follows:

Sheet 5 (By-Notation):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by notation - UC, US.

Sheet 6 (By-Case):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by case - SIM, HOS, IFA.

Sheet 7 (By-Process):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by how well the derivation process is explained - well explained, partially explained, not present.

Sheet 8 (By-Grade):

Model correctness and model completeness is compared by the exam grades, converted to categorical values High, Low , and Medium.

This dataset presents the quantitative raw data that was collected under the H2020 RRI2SCALE project for the D1.4 - “Large scale regional citizen surveys report”. The dataset includes the answers that were provided by almost 8,000 participants from 4 pilot European regions (Kriti, Vestland, Galicia, and Overijssel) regarding the general public's views, concerns, and moral issues about the current and future trajectories of their RTD&I ecosystem. The original survey questionnaire was created by White Research SRL and disseminated to the regions through supporting pilot partners. Data collection took place from June 2020 to September 2020 through 4 different waves – one for each region. Based on the conclusion of a consortium vote during the kick-off meeting, it was decided that instead of resource-intensive methods that would render data collection unduly expensive, to fill in the quotas responses were collected through online panels by survey companies that were used for each region. For the statistical analysis of the data and the conclusions drawn from the analysis, you can access the "Large scale regional citizen surveys report" (D1.4).

This study compared the effects of cold water immersion (CWI) and hot water immersion (HWI) on muscle recovery following a muscle-damaging exercise protocol in women. Thirty healthy women (23.3 ± 2.9 years) were randomly assigned to either the CWI, HWI, or control (CON) groups. Participants completed a standardised exercise protocol (5 x 20 drop-jumps), followed by a 10 min recovery intervention (CWI, HWI, or CON) immediately and 120 min post-exercise. Physiological responses, including muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2), core and skin temperature, and heart rate, were assessed at baseline, immediately post-exercise, after the first recovery intervention (postInt), and during 30 min follow-up. Recovery was evaluated through maximal voluntary isometric contraction, muscle swelling, muscle soreness ratings, and serum creatine kinase at baseline, 24, 48, and 72 h post-exercise. A mixed-effects model was used to account for repeated measures over time. Results showed lower SmO2 values in the CWI compared to the HWI group at 20 min (Δ-6.76%, CI: −0.27 to −13.25, p = 0.038) and 30 min (Δ-9.86%, CI: −3.37 to −16.35, p = 0.001), and compared to CON at 30 min (Δ-7.28%, CI: −13.77 to −0.79, p = 0.022). Core temperature was significantly higher in the HWI than the CWI group (postInt and 30 min), while it was significantly lower in the CWI group than CON (30 min). CWI caused a substantial decrease in skin temperature compared to HWI and CON between postInt and 30 min follow-up (all p < 0.001). Skin temperature was higher in the HWI group compared to CON at postInt and throughout 30 min follow-up (all p < 0.001). No significant differences in recovery markers were observed between CWI and HWI groups, although HWI led to slightly higher creatine kinase levels (24 h and 72 h) and greater muscle swelling (24 h) compared to CON. Despite distinct acute physiological responses to CWI and HWI, neither improved subjective or objective recovery outcomes during the 72 h follow-up compared to CON in women following a muscle-damaging exercise protocol.Trial registration numberNCT04902924 (ClinicalTrials.gov), SNCTP000004468 (Swiss National Clinical Trial Portal).

Dirty Cafe Sales Dataset

Overview

The Dirty Cafe Sales dataset contains 10,000 rows of synthetic data representing sales transactions in a cafe. This dataset is intentionally "dirty," with missing values, inconsistent data, and errors introduced to provide a realistic scenario for data cleaning and exploratory data analysis (EDA). It can be used to practice cleaning techniques, data wrangling, and feature engineering.

File Information

• File Name: dirty_cafe_sales.csv
• Number of Rows: 10,000
• Number of Columns: 8

Columns Description

Data Characteristics

1. Missing Values:

   • Some columns (e.g., Item, Payment Method, Location) may contain missing values represented as None or empty cells.

2. Invalid Values:

   • Some rows contain invalid entries like "ERROR" or "UNKNOWN" to simulate real-world data issues.

3. Price Consistency:

   • Prices for menu items are consistent but may have missing or incorrect values introduced.

Menu Items

The dataset includes the following menu items with their respective price ranges:

Use Cases

This dataset is suitable for: - Practicing data cleaning techniques such as handling missing values, removing duplicates, and correcting invalid entries. - Exploring EDA techniques like visualizations and summary statistics. - Performing feature engineering for machine learning workflows.

Cleaning Steps Suggestions

To clean this dataset, consider the following steps: 1. Handle Missing Values: - Fill missing numeric values with the median or mean. - Replace missing categorical values with the mode or "Unknown."

1. Handle Invalid Values:

   • Replace invalid entries like "ERROR" and "UNKNOWN" with NaN or appropriate values.

2. Date Consistency:

   • Ensure all dates are in a consistent format.
   • Fill missing dates with plausible values based on nearby records.

3. Feature Engineering:

   • Create new columns, such as Day of the Week or Transaction Month, for further analysis.

License

This dataset is released under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License. You are free to use, share, and adapt it, provided you give appropriate credit.

Feedback

If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out through the dataset's discussion board on Kaggle.

Data and code for figures and statistics reported in Midolo, G., De Frenne, P., Hölzel, N. & Wellstein, C. (2019). Global patterns of intraspecific leaf trait responses to elevation.For a complete list reference of studies included in the meta-analysis, see the Supporting Information of our article.See the "csv_file_description" file for detailed information on dataset description and the R code to analyze the data.For any question, please contact me at: gabriele.midolo@natec.unibz.it

Here you can find raw data and information about each of the 34 datasets generated by the mulset algorithm and used for further analysis in SIMON. Each dataset is stored in separate folder which contains 4 files: json_info: This file contains, number of features with their names and number of subjects that are available for the same dataset data_testing: data frame with data used to test trained model data_training: data frame with data used to train models results: direct unfiltered data from database Files are written in feather format. Here is an example of data structure for each file in repository. File was compressed using 7-Zip available at https://www.7-zip.org/.

Supplementary raw data files associated with R scripts for data analysis (https://github.com/BSmithLab/Biodome). Files show peaks after filtering known contaminants.

A csv file containing the tidal frequencies used for statistical analyses in the paper "Estimating Freshwater Flows From Tidally-Affected Hydrographic Data" by Dan Pagendam and Don Percival.

Sample data for exercises in Further Adventures in Data Cleaning.

This dashboard was created from data published by Olist Store (a Brazilian e-commerce public dataset). Raw data contains information about 100 000 orders from 2016 to 2018 placed in many regions of Brazil.

The raw datasets were imported into Excel using “Get data” option (formerly known as “Power Query”) and cleaned. An additional table with the names of Brazilian states was also imported from the Wikipedia page.

A Data Table about payment information was created based on imported statistics with the usage of nested formulas. Then, proper pivot charts were used to build an Olist Store Payment Dashboard which allows you to review the data using a connected timeline and slicers.

Raw data for data analysis and graph construction at pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment.

In this project, I conducted a comprehensive analysis of retail and warehouse sales data to derive actionable insights. The primary objective was to understand sales trends, evaluate performance across channels, and identify key contributors to overall business success.

To achieve this, I transformed raw data into interactive Excel dashboards that highlight sales performance and channel contributions, providing a clear and concise representation of business metrics.

Key Highlights of the Project:

Created two dashboards: Sales Dashboard and Contribution Dashboard. Answered critical business questions, such as monthly trends, channel performance, and top contributors. Presented actionable insights with professional visuals, making it easy for stakeholders to make data-driven decisions.

Data that was used to train the SVM. As the train-test data were assigned randomly for every training iteration, the individual data used for generating the subfigures b–e are not separately listed, as these cannot be manually recreated but depend on the train-test assignment by the algorithm. (ZIP)

R code to reproduce the construction of social networks from the raw data, bout analysis, data checking, and randomization-based null models, ;R code to reproduce dyadic and nodal regression analyses; uses the processed data from the aninet R package

Raw data and statistical analysis pertaining to use of alteplase in COVID 19

Raw data of the specimens in Insect Collection of Central South University of Forestry and Technology.

Raw data used for analysis