This statistic shows the recycling rates of consumer electronics and tech devices in 2015. CRT monitors have a recycling rate of ** in the United States.

This statistic represents the evolution of the recycling rate of plastic packaging waste in France from 2005 to 2015. In 2015, around ** percent of plastic packaging waste was recycled.

NSW local council annual survey data reports from NSW EPA: waste and recyclables collected from NSW households from 2015 to presentPeclet added a breakdown by material type of the recycled and residual waste volumes. This breakdown is indicative only. For more information on how breakdown was calculated please contact us.

In the fiscal year 2022, the recycling rate of plastic packaging in Japan amounted to ** percent. The figure decreased compared to **** percent in the previous fiscal year.

Tonnages of household waste sent for reuse, recycling and composting WasteDataFlow - the web based system for statutory reporting of municipal waste data by UK local authorities to government. Members of the public can register for public access to WasteDataFlow on their website, where there is a user guide for the public, which includes instructions for registering. DEFRA waste and recycling statistics – website provides a range of waste datasets including local authority and commercial waste
Waste and Resources Action Programme – website provides statistics from WasteDataFlow outputs and information on local authority waste and recycling services. Members of the public can register and log in to the site.

This statistic displays the recycling rate of electronic waste in the United States as of 2015, broken down by various product types. At that time, the recycling rate of flat screen televisions was about ** percent.

Recycling electronic waste – additional information

Electronic waste, commonly called e-waste, has become more problematic in today’s society as the usage of various electronic devices has become commonplace throughout the world. As older generations of electronic equipment and obsolete technologies are gradually being replaced, the generation of e-waste has increased. It is expected that there will be almost ** million metric tons of e-waste generated worldwide by 2018. In 2014, Asia generated the largest portion of electronic waste, totaling some ** million metric tons, while Africa generated just under * million metric tons.

Fortunately, many countries have taken steps to improve the collection and recycling of electronic waste. In the United States, where the collection of e-waste has become more convenient, recycling rates have improved. In 2015, recycling rates for laptops and flat screen TVs reached an estimated ** percent and ** percent, respectively. Despite no longer being useful in terms of their original purpose, the components of electrical and electronic equipment can still have considerable monetary value. Used electronics management systems, such as reusing and refurbishing devices, provide a way to capture this value, but they must also manage potential risks to the environment and human health. The improper treatment of used devices can lead to contaminated land and water near recycling facilities. In general, hazardous materials such as lead, cadmium, and mercury have mostly been phased out of the production of new electronics, but older devices containing such materials are likely to remain in the waste stream for the near future.

In 2022, **** percent of waste from households in the United Kingdom was recycled, slightly down from **** percent a year earlier. Wales has consistently reported the highest recycling rate for household waste in the UK, at almost ** percent in 2022. In contrast, Scotland had the lowest rate, at **** percent.

This publication covers annual estimates for waste collected by local authorities in England and the regions. These statistics are based on data submitted by all local authorities in England to WasteDataFlow on the waste they collect and manage.

The methodology and recycling explainer documents give background and context to this statistical notice, accompanying datasets and the waste and recycling measures they present.

There is also a further historical note on the definition of local authority collected waste relating to earlier releases.

The entire raw dataset is available in CSV format and can be found here: https://www.data.gov.uk/dataset/0e0c12d8-24f6-461f-b4bc-f6d6a5bf2de5/wastedataflow-local-authority-waste-management" class="govuk-link">WasteDataFlow - Local Authority waste management - data.gov.uk

Historic releases

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20250102235615/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2022-2023

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20230802024231/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results-202122" class="govuk-link">2021- 2022

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20220503105415/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2020 - 2021

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20210728220801/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2019-2020

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20200604042448/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2018 - 2019

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20190903035029/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2017 - 2018

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20181207030346/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2016 - 2017

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20170418015547/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2015 - 2016 This includes the ad hoc release entitled “Provisional 2016/17 local authority data on waste collection and treatment for England (April to June and July to September 2016)”.

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20160512131028/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2014 - 2015

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20150401112814/https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2013 - 2014

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20140321171631/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-results" class="govuk-link">2012 - 2013

Historic datasets

Historic datasets

This dataset shows the Convention Center recycling efforts during fiscal year 2015. Data includes fiscal year, quarter and month of collection, the category (Recycling or waste), sub-category (recycled material, reused material and material sent to the landfill) and the weight in pounds for each.

This dataset consists of 34 transcripts of semi-structured qualitative in-depth interviews with households in areas of 4 countries with high/low consumer recycling rates (England, Scotland, Spain, Germany). The aim was to explore how they engaged with the use and disposal of plastic packaging. We looked specifically at social practices within different households as this is a neglected but important site for managing waste. We explored social practices, perceptions, emotions, knowledge, and understandings of plastics packaging (recycling, repurposing, retaining, reusing, refusing). The interviews shed light on the value of plastics recycling which is understood widely but in practice the lived experience of plastics recycling is complex and frequently requires negotiating relationships. Ideas about classification systems and sorting differ considerably for cultural reasons; inter- generational perspectives on the value of plastics are also apparent and better understanding of these issues will help us shed light on the complex social context of circular economies.The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the problem of plastics in the environment, impacting on waste management across the UK, EU and globally. We have seen increased demand for single use plastics for public health purposes, disruptions to the usual distribution pathways and variations in reuse, recycle and retention which are all vital to developing a circular economy. As countries begin to ease lockdown restrictions it is likely that citizens will face greater pressures in managing their waste with potentially more home based working, less travel and socialising and increased single use plastic packaging (e.g. medical equipment, customer avoidance of 'loose' retail products). An explosion of interest in the ongoing problem of plastic waste has seen a diverse range of solutions being proposed. Recently we completed the PRISM project (2015-18) with a number of industry leaders that has shown a real and sustainable proof of concept that promises to be a significant part of the solution to this problem. We will address the automatic sorting of waste plastic containers used in food and non-food grade applications as is partially done at waste recycling plants. Current automated near infra-red sorting techniques are unable to identify food grade from non-food grade packaging which consigns high value polymer resins into low grade; non food grade uses or worse still, landfill and incineration. We will enable a low cost labelling system suitable for commercialisation, to make this sorting a reality; support the long term viability for closed loop sorting of these materials (PP, PE, PET, e.g. plastic milk bottles, drinks containers to household detergent bottles). Previously our consortium demonstrated a labelling system that can be used for high speed sorting of various crushed plastic bottles at high belt speeds with high purity and high yield which has received a great deal of interest from global brands. To commercialise this proof of concept it is desirable to optimise the luminescent materials that will be taken forwards so we will develop a sustainable low cost luminescent marker system using low toxicity and environmentally safe materials, thus lowering any commercial barrier to enter the market. Once this technology is proven then we will be in a strong position to seek wide implementation of our technology and run full scale field trials with major brand owners facilitated through our NextlooPP partner. This transformative project will have the effect to reduce inappropriate plastics disposal and increase recycling rates by increasing the monetary value of the recycled material. This will address the Plastics Pacts objective of 30% recycled content by finalising the underpinning luminescent labelling technology to be implemented. Implementation of this technology into the NextlooPP process will facilitate the availability of rPP granules for food, cosmetics and lower grade applications thus reducing the demand for virgin polymer. Tackling the systemic problem of plastic waste effectively cannot be achieved through purely technical means and our research offers fresh insights into people's perspectives on recycling and how consumers (UK, Spain, Germany) engage with surface markers on plastic packaging in their households, a neglected but important site for managing waste. This project thus moves beyond the technical infrastructure of waste management and design of products to address people's perceptions and behaviour with plastic packaging in their every day life and how their perceptions and behaviour might have changed in light of COVID-19. This ambitious project will thus help position the UK at the forefront of innovation in sorting hard to recycle plastics and offers fresh insights by integrating technical, business, policy and consumer focused elements to ensure that we are in alignment with stake holders all across the plastic packaging supply chain. This was not intended to be a representative sample as the aim was rather to produce 'rich' 'deep' data which contributes to social science research. We purposively sampled a range of participants broadly representing different demographics in selected countries. Participants were aged over 18 years and 34 households included parents with young children, multigenerational households, student flat shares and retired couples in S. England (n=3); N.Scotland (n=6); W. Scotland (n=6); S.E England (n=6); Central Germany (n=6); S. Spain (n=7). Participants discussed their recycling practices in relation to everyday plastics products in their homes and participated in the ‘plastic sorting challenge’ with various items.

This is a statistical file of the recycling status of Jongno-gu. This is a file organized by the tonnage per month of the files converted from waste to recycling, and it is data from 2015 to 2021.

Material recovery service providers have contended with numerous economic headwinds in recent years, ranging from subdued economic growth during the cost-of-living crisis and the high base rate environment as central banks aimed to curb spiralling inflation. Revenue is expected to grow at a compound annual rate of 4.1% over the five years through 2025 to €120.7 billion, including an estimated dip of 0.7% in 2025. Demand for material recovery services is highly contingent on downstream construction, mining and manufacturing sectors producing hefty waste. Since the end of the pandemic, high interest rates have ramped up the cost of borrowing while building material costs skyrocketed, putting off many developers from beginning projects and weighing on construction activity. Subdued economic growth has also hit the manufacturing sector, eroding demand for material recovery services. According to the European Commission, 527 kilograms (kg) of municipal waste per capita was generated in the EU in 2021, while 49% of municipal waste in the EU was recycled. This figure declined to 511kg of municipal waste per capita generated in 2023, with 48% of waste being recycled. The decrease in municipal waste per capita suggests a potential shift towards more sustainable consumption and production patterns. This can positively influence the quality of materials recovered, as higher-quality waste streams may become available for recycling. Decreased waste generation and stagnating recycling rates also signify reduced available materials for recovery, which has impacted revenue streams for companies reliant on high volumes. This stagnation might indicate challenges in public engagement and infrastructure that need addressing to prevent further declines. However, growing recycling rates in the coming years are set to maintain demand, supported by government initiatives like the European Green Deal, which includes the Circular Economy Action Plan. Revenue is expected to climb at a compound annual rate of 3.1% over the five years through 2030 to €140.9 billion. Economic conditions are set to improve in the short term as inflationary pressures subside, allowing central banks to adopt looser monetary policy and support GDP growth. This will drive downstream construction and manufacturing sector activity in the short term, lifting demand for material recovery services. The growing emphasis on sustainability will also persist in the coming years as countries across Europe strive for a circular economy, driving demand and supporting revenue growth.

Costa Rica Total Treatment: Recovery: Material Recovery: Recycling data was reported at 8.314 % in 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.558 % for 2022. Costa Rica Total Treatment: Recovery: Material Recovery: Recycling data is updated yearly, averaging 3.649 % from Dec 2015 (Median) to 2023, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8.314 % in 2023 and a record low of 0.922 % in 2015. Costa Rica Total Treatment: Recovery: Material Recovery: Recycling data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Costa Rica – Table CR.OECD.ESG: Environmental: Municipal Waste Treatment: OECD Member: Annual.

Germany PPI: Mfg: Recycling (RC) data was reported at 100.300 2015=100 in Aug 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 100.500 2015=100 for Jul 2018. Germany PPI: Mfg: Recycling (RC) data is updated monthly, averaging 100.400 2015=100 from Mar 2017 (Median) to Aug 2018, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 110.300 2015=100 in Mar 2017 and a record low of 80.100 2015=100 in Apr 2018. Germany PPI: Mfg: Recycling (RC) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal Statistics Office Germany. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Germany – Table DE.I025: Producer Price Index: 2015=100.

Between 2010-2011 and 2014-2015 the amount of glass and plastic being sent for recycling by councils increased by about 6,500 tonnes and 6,900 tonnes respectively, although paper and cardboard recycling declined by about 24,000 tonnes.

Material recovery service providers have contended with numerous economic headwinds in recent years, ranging from subdued economic growth during the cost-of-living crisis and the high base rate environment as central banks aimed to curb spiralling inflation. Revenue is expected to grow at a compound annual rate of 4.1% over the five years through 2025 to €120.7 billion, including an estimated dip of 0.7% in 2025. Demand for material recovery services is highly contingent on downstream construction, mining and manufacturing sectors producing hefty waste. Since the end of the pandemic, high interest rates have ramped up the cost of borrowing while building material costs skyrocketed, putting off many developers from beginning projects and weighing on construction activity. Subdued economic growth has also hit the manufacturing sector, eroding demand for material recovery services. According to the European Commission, 527 kilograms (kg) of municipal waste per capita was generated in the EU in 2021, while 49% of municipal waste in the EU was recycled. This figure declined to 511kg of municipal waste per capita generated in 2023, with 48% of waste being recycled. The decrease in municipal waste per capita suggests a potential shift towards more sustainable consumption and production patterns. This can positively influence the quality of materials recovered, as higher-quality waste streams may become available for recycling. Decreased waste generation and stagnating recycling rates also signify reduced available materials for recovery, which has impacted revenue streams for companies reliant on high volumes. This stagnation might indicate challenges in public engagement and infrastructure that need addressing to prevent further declines. However, growing recycling rates in the coming years are set to maintain demand, supported by government initiatives like the European Green Deal, which includes the Circular Economy Action Plan. Revenue is expected to climb at a compound annual rate of 3.1% over the five years through 2030 to €140.9 billion. Economic conditions are set to improve in the short term as inflationary pressures subside, allowing central banks to adopt looser monetary policy and support GDP growth. This will drive downstream construction and manufacturing sector activity in the short term, lifting demand for material recovery services. The growing emphasis on sustainability will also persist in the coming years as countries across Europe strive for a circular economy, driving demand and supporting revenue growth.

This statistic displays the end-of-life vehicle recycling rates in Germany from 2004 to 2015. The end-of-life vehicle recycling rates increased over this period, peaking at **** percent in 2010. From 2004 to 2015, the end-of-life vehicle recycling rates increased **** percent.

Comparison of Disposal/ Recycling Costs, Weight Collected and Participation in the Household Hazardous Waste program for Fiscal Years 2010-2015.

Material recovery service providers have contended with numerous economic headwinds in recent years, ranging from subdued economic growth during the cost-of-living crisis and the high base rate environment as central banks aimed to curb spiralling inflation. Revenue is expected to grow at a compound annual rate of 4.1% over the five years through 2025 to €120.7 billion, including an estimated dip of 0.7% in 2025. Demand for material recovery services is highly contingent on downstream construction, mining and manufacturing sectors producing hefty waste. Since the end of the pandemic, high interest rates have ramped up the cost of borrowing while building material costs skyrocketed, putting off many developers from beginning projects and weighing on construction activity. Subdued economic growth has also hit the manufacturing sector, eroding demand for material recovery services. According to the European Commission, 527 kilograms (kg) of municipal waste per capita was generated in the EU in 2021, while 49% of municipal waste in the EU was recycled. This figure declined to 511kg of municipal waste per capita generated in 2023, with 48% of waste being recycled. The decrease in municipal waste per capita suggests a potential shift towards more sustainable consumption and production patterns. This can positively influence the quality of materials recovered, as higher-quality waste streams may become available for recycling. Decreased waste generation and stagnating recycling rates also signify reduced available materials for recovery, which has impacted revenue streams for companies reliant on high volumes. This stagnation might indicate challenges in public engagement and infrastructure that need addressing to prevent further declines. However, growing recycling rates in the coming years are set to maintain demand, supported by government initiatives like the European Green Deal, which includes the Circular Economy Action Plan. Revenue is expected to climb at a compound annual rate of 3.1% over the five years through 2030 to €140.9 billion. Economic conditions are set to improve in the short term as inflationary pressures subside, allowing central banks to adopt looser monetary policy and support GDP growth. This will drive downstream construction and manufacturing sector activity in the short term, lifting demand for material recovery services. The growing emphasis on sustainability will also persist in the coming years as countries across Europe strive for a circular economy, driving demand and supporting revenue growth.