Community Redevelopment Areas - Web Map

Under Florida law (Chapter 163, Part III), local governments are able to designate areas as Community Redevelopment Areas (CRA) when certain conditions exist (e.g. a shortage of affordable housing, inadequate infrastructure). Since all the monies used in financing CRA activities are locally generated, CRAs are not overseen by the state, but redevelopment plans must be consistent with local government comprehensive plans. This layer contains areas in Orange County designated for redevelopment and revitalization. The name of each area is included.

This project traces the history of urban planning in San Francisco, placing special emphasis on unrealized schemes. Rather than using visual material simply to illustrate outcomes, Imagined San Francisco uses historical plans, maps, architectural renderings, and photographs to show what might have been. By enabling users to layer a series of urban plans, the project presents the city not only as a sequence of material changes, but also as a contingent process and a battleground for political power. Savvy institutional actors--like banks, developers, and many public officials--understood that in some cases to clearly articulate their interests would be to invite challenges. That means that textual sources like newspapers and municipal reports are limited in what they can tell researchers about the shape of political power. Urban plans, however, often speak volumes about interests and dynamics upon which textual sources remain silent. Mortgage lenders, for example, apparently thought it unwise to state that they wished to see a poor neighborhood cleared, to be replaced with a freeway onramp. Yet visual analysis of planning proposals makes that interest plain. So in the process of showing how the city might have looked, Imagined San Francisco also shows how political power actually was negotiated and exercised.

Community Redevelopment Areas are areas identified and designated by local elected and economic development officials. Questions should be directed to the appropriate city or to the Volusia County Economic Development Office at (386) 248-8048. Data was extracted from the Volusia County Property Appraiser’s database based on CRA number and dissolved to create single CRA polygons. Gaps created by roads between these CRA polygons were then filled to create boundary polygons.

Update Frequency: Update frequency: Datasets are refreshed every night to ensure the most current information is available. Even if there are no changes, the data will be updated nightly.

A Redevelopment Plan is a guiding document, approved by the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (RACM) and the Common Council, in accordance with the State of Wisconsin’s blighted area law. This document creates a boundary, goals and requirements for the specific geographic area. These goals and requirements may include numerous issues such as blight designation, property acquisition, land use planning and design requirements. http://city.milwaukee.gov/PlanningPermits/PlansStudies.htm

This is the incremental revenue received by the Agency from the Clark County Treasurer for all real property taxes collected from all properties owned in a specific redevelopment area. The Agency is solely reliant on tax increment revenue for operations and to reinvest in designated redevelopment areas to provide financial incentives to developers, residents, and visitors in an effort to increase property values and eliminate blight.

The San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, along with all 400 redevelopment agencies in California, was dissolved on February 1, 2012, by order of the California Supreme Court in a decision issued on December 29, 2011 (California Redevelopment Association et al. v. Ana Matosantos). On June 27, 2012, the California Legislature passed and the Governor signed AB 1484, a bill making technical and substantive changes to AB 26, the dissolution bill that was found largely constitutional by the Supreme Court on December 29, 2011. In response to the requirements of AB 26 and AB 1484, the City and County of San Francisco has created the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (OCII) as the Successor Agency to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (“Successor Agency”). Pursuant to state and local legislation, the Successor Agency is governed by two bodies, the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency and the Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure. These boundaries are provided as historic reference. You may learn more about OCII at http://sfocii.org/

COMPLETED 2010. The data was converted from the most recent (2010) versions of the adopted plans, which can be found at https://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/planning/plans/ Supplemental Information: In March 2010, Pima Association of Governments (PAG), in cooperation with the City of Tucson (City), initiated the Planned Land Use Data Conversion Project. This 9-month effort involved evaluating mapped land use designations and selected spatially explicit policies for nearly 50 of the City's adopted neighborhood, area, and subregional plans and converting the information into a Geographic Information System (GIS) format. Further documentation for this file can be obtained from the City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department or Pima Association of Governments Technical Services. A brief summary report was provided, as requested, to the City of Tucson which highlights some of the key issues found during the conversion process (e.g., lack of mapping and terminology consistency among plans). The feature class "Plan_boundaries" represents the boundaries of the adopted plans. The feature class "Plan_mapped_land_use" represents the land use designations as they are mapped in the adopted plans. Some information was gathered that is implicit based on the land use designation or zones (see field descriptions below). Since this information is not explicitly stated in the plans, it should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes. The feature class "Plan_selected_policies" represents the spatially explicit policies that were fairly straightforward to map. Since these policies are not represented in adopted maps, this feature class should only be viewed by City staff for general planning purposes only. 2010 - created by Jamison Brown, working as an independent contractor for Pima Association of Governments, created this file in 2010 by digitizing boundaries as depicted (i.e. for the mapped land use) or described in the plans (i.e. for the narrative policies). In most cases, this involved tracing based on parcel (paregion) or street center line (stnetall) feature classes. Snapping was used to provide line coincidence. For some map conversions, freehand sketches were drawn to mimick the freehand sketches in the adopted plan. Field descriptions Field descriptions for the "Plan_boundaries" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number ADOPT_DATE: Date of Plan adoption IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator Field descriptions for the "Plan_mapped_land_use" feature class: Plan_Name: Plan name Plan_Type: Plan type (e.g., Neighborhood Plan) Plan_Num: Plan number LU_DES: Land use designation (e.g., Low density residential) LISTED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Allowable zones as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MIN: Minimum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_TARGET: Target residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_RAC_MAX: Maximum residences per acre (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MIN: Minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_TARGET: Target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan LISTED_FAR_MAX: Maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable), as listed in the Plan BUILDING_HEIGHT_MAX Building height maximum (ft.) if determined by Plan policy IMPORTANT: A disclaimer about the data as it is unofficial. URL: Uniform Resource Locator IMPLIED_ALLOWABLE_ZONES: Implied (not listed in the Plan) allowable zones IMPLIED_RAC_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_RAC_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum residences per acre (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MIN: Implied (not listed in the Plan) minimum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_TARGET: Implied (not listed in the Plan) target Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_FAR_MAX: Implied (not listed in the Plan) maximum Floor Area Ratio (if applicable) IMPLIED_LU_CATEGORY: Implied (not listed in the Plan) general land use category. General categories used include residential, office, commercial, industrial, and other.PurposeLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Known ErrorsLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.Data ContactJohn BeallCity of Tucson Development Services 520-791-5550John.Beall@tucsonaz.govUpdate FrequencyLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

State Senate Redevelopment Areas

The dataset provides the easements of the preparing formation and redevelopment projects in Vilnius city, their type, plan number, legal area, relevance of the data and stage.

The Redevelopment Project Status Inquiry Service API is a data service that systematically provides key information on ongoing redevelopment projects within a region. This API allows users to search for key project-related information, such as district number, address, area (㎡), and project type, based on registration number. This API allows residents and stakeholders to understand basic project status, including location, scale, and type. Administrative agencies can utilize this data for project management, planning, and regional development monitoring. Furthermore, researchers and developers can leverage this data to build diverse applications, including urban planning analysis, real estate development maps, and redevelopment/reconstruction apps. Disclosure of redevelopment project status increases transparency in regional development, improves citizen participation and information accessibility, and contributes to efficient urban management and planning.

This feature set contains the current boundaries of Priority Development Areas (PDAs) used by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for analysis and mapping related to Plan Bay Area 2050+. These areas, which are nominated by a local government resolution and approved by the ABAG Executive Board, are eligible for grant funding allocated to planning and projects in PDAs.Plan Bay Area 2050+ is the latest update to the long-range Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Region. It will update Plan Bay Area 2050, approved in 2021.This PDA feature set is limited to use in general mapping and analysis related to Plan Bay Area 2050+ and the planning activities of local governments that have nominated PDAs.More information on PDA planning at the Association of Bay Area Governments and Plan Bay Area 2050+ can be found at:Priority Development Areas - https://abag.ca.gov/our-work/land-use/pda-priority-development-areas.Plan Bay Area 2050+ -https://abag.ca.gov/our-work/land-use/plan-bay-area-2050.DO NOT USE this feature layer for mapping or analysis related to earlier versions of Plan Bay Area. Data and feature layers for those PDA versions are available as separate resources.

Potential Development Areas designated in the Argyll and Bute adopted Local Development Plan 2015. These are broad areas identified by this plan in the Proposal Maps. They are mainly, but not exclusively on the edge of settlements and constitute land within which opportunities may emerge during the plan- period for infill, rounding-off, redevelopment or new development. Such opportunities are not currently fully resolved and issues may require to be overcome in terms of the 'mini development brief' accompanying these PDAs before development opportunities within the PDA area can be realised and be supported by this plan. A PDA may include a number of identifiable development sites

The Urban Development Program (UDP) monitors and reports on major residential redevelopment projects across metropolitan Melbourne. Major redevelopment projects are those comprising ten or more dwellings. Data is collected from commercial data sources and through analysis of aerial imagery, and is verified through consultations with local council representatives. These include projects which may have an existing planning permit, or are in the planning processes, those that are current under construction, as well as potential longer term projects on sites that local councils have identified for residential purposes. A timing classification is attributed to each project based on commercial data sources, consultation with local councils, and the stage the project has reached in the planning process. The Urban Development Program reports on major redevelopment projects using the following categories: ¿ Completed (a project was completed from Jan 2017 to Jan 2019) ¿ Under Construction (a project was under construction at Jan 2019) ¿ Firm (Recent planning approval, project with pre-sales) ¿ Likely (In planning assessment, planning permit extension may be required to develop) ¿ Possible (Long term redevelopment site, permit lapsed ). While the UDP acknowledges a proportion of proposed projects may be abandoned or delayed, the classification process provides an indicator of available supply provided there is sufficient demand. In addition, it is acknowledged there are also sites within the established parts of Melbourne that may be suitable for residential development into the future but have not yet been identified. The UDP will continue to report on these sites as they are identified for redevelopment for residential purposes. It should also be noted that the timings attached to these projects are indicative. Construction rates can be cyclical in nature, and highly dependent on underlying demand and pre-sales, economic cycles and industry capacity. This can mean that stated development intentions will vary from on the-ground construction activity over time and by location.

Alkis — flaky description of the redevelopment areas:As a rehabilitation area in Germany, a clearly defined area applies in which a municipality (cities, municipalities, also villages) carries out a “city-building rehabilitation measure”. A urban rehabilitation measure § 136(1) of the BauGB is carried out in a refurbishment area in order to remedy, substantially improve or redesign urban development maladministration or functional weaknesses.

Table of development assumptions by land use zoning category to support the City of Seattle Zone Development Capacity Model.

The map shows the assisted areas of the Hamburg Framework Programme for Integrated Neighbourhood Development (RISE). RISE forms the programmatic umbrella of urban development funding at the state level. It covers the areas of federal-state urban development funding in the programme areas of social city, urban redevelopment, active urban and district centres, urban heritage protection and future urban greenery as well as redevelopment areas. Since 2020, there has been a new programme structure with only three programmes left in the future: Living centres, social cohesion and growth and sustainable renewal. Until the household completion of the five old programmes in 2023, the old and new programmes will be mapped together. Further information: www.hamburg.de/rise

Nuclear Site Brownfield Redevelopment Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Nuclear Site Brownfield Redevelopment market size reached USD 5.3 billion in 2024, driven by a robust global push for land reutilization and sustainable urban expansion. The market is poised to grow at a CAGR of 7.6% from 2025 to 2033, with the total market value forecasted to reach USD 10.3 billion by 2033. This growth is underpinned by increasing governmental mandates for environmental restoration, advances in remediation technology, and a rising demand for new residential, commercial, and industrial spaces in urbanized regions.

One of the primary growth factors for the Nuclear Site Brownfield Redevelopment market is the global emphasis on sustainable land use and urban regeneration. As urban populations swell, cities are under immense pressure to maximize available land without encroaching on greenfield sites. Redeveloping former nuclear sites, which often occupy strategic locations near established infrastructure, offers a compelling solution. Governments across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific are incentivizing the repurposing of these lands through policy frameworks, tax incentives, and grants. Additionally, public awareness regarding the environmental and economic benefits of brownfield redevelopment is fostering a more positive perception, further accelerating market expansion.

Technological advancements are also a significant driver in the nuclear site brownfield redevelopment market. Innovations in remediation, demolition, and environmental monitoring have dramatically reduced the risks and costs associated with decontaminating former nuclear sites. For instance, the advent of advanced robotics, AI-driven environmental monitoring, and more effective waste management processes has enabled stakeholders to undertake complex projects with greater confidence and efficiency. These technologies not only ensure compliance with stringent regulatory standards but also expedite project timelines, making redevelopment more financially attractive for private developers and utilities alike.

Another crucial factor propelling market growth is the evolving regulatory landscape. Governments and environmental agencies are tightening regulations around nuclear site decommissioning and post-closure land use, compelling utilities and site owners to act decisively. The establishment of clear guidelines for site assessment, remediation, and redevelopment has reduced legal ambiguities, encouraging more stakeholders to participate in redevelopment projects. Furthermore, the integration of nuclear site brownfield redevelopment into broader urban planning and climate resilience strategies is ensuring a steady pipeline of projects, particularly in regions facing land scarcity and industrial decline.

From a regional perspective, Europe and North America are currently leading the market, accounting for over 60% of the global nuclear site brownfield redevelopment activity in 2024. This dominance is attributed to their large number of decommissioned nuclear facilities, mature regulatory environments, and well-established stakeholder ecosystems. However, the Asia Pacific region is emerging as a high-growth market, driven by rapid urbanization, increasing numbers of decommissioned nuclear sites, and supportive government initiatives. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are expected to witness steady growth, albeit from a smaller base, as regional governments begin to prioritize sustainable redevelopment and environmental restoration.

Redevelopment Type Analysis

The Nuclear Site Brownfield Redevelopment market is segmented by redevelopment type into Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Mixed-Use, and Others. Residential redevelopment is gaining significant traction, especially in urban areas facing acute housing shortages. By transforming decommissioned nuclear sites into residential complexes, cities can address housing demands while revita