100+ datasets found
  1. f

    Reliability Data: Laboratory Failure-Time and Single-Time Strength Data

    • iastate.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 11, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    William Meeker; Luis Escobar; Francis Pascual (2021). Reliability Data: Laboratory Failure-Time and Single-Time Strength Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25380/iastate.14454753.v1
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 11, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Iowa State University
    Authors
    William Meeker; Luis Escobar; Francis Pascual
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Reliability tests are commonly used in product design and manufacturing processes to assure the reliability of components, subsystems, and, in some cases, complete systems. Typical responses are time to failure (either in terms of operating time or number of cycle of operation) or strength or other critical material properties. Virtually alllaboratory reliability tests are accelerated (e.g., by testing at an increases cycling rate or at higher-than-usual levels of temperature or voltage) so that information is obtained in a timely manner. The resulting test data are often censored because not all units fail by the end of the test.

  2. d

    Pilot Testing of SHRP 2 Reliability Data and Analytical Products: Florida...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Dec 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Highway Administration (2023). Pilot Testing of SHRP 2 Reliability Data and Analytical Products: Florida [supporting datasets] [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/pilot-testing-of-shrp-2-reliability-data-and-analytical-products-florida-supporting-datase
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Highway Administration
    Area covered
    Florida
    Description

    "SHRP 2 initiated the L38 project to pilot test products from five of the program’s completed projects. The products support reliability estimation and use based on data analyses, analytical techniques, and decision-making framework. The L38 project has two main objectives: (1) to assist agencies in using travel time reliability as a measure in their business practices and (2) to receive feedback from the project research teams on the applicability and usefulness of the products tested, along with their suggested possible refinements. SHRP 2 selected four teams from California, Minnesota, Florida, and Washington. Project L38C tested elements from Projects L02, L05, L07, and L08. Project L02 identified methods to collect, archive, and integrate required data for reliability estimation and methods for analyzing and visualizing the causes of unreliability based on the collected data. Projects L07 and L08 produced analytical techniques and tools for estimating reliability based on developed models and allowing the estimation of reliability and the impacts on reliability of alternative mitigating strategies. Project L05 provided guidance regarding how to use reliability assessments to support the business processes of transportation agencies. The datasets in this zip file, which is 7.83 MB in size, support of SHRP 2 reliability project L38C, "Pilot testing of SHRP 2 reliability data and analytical products: Florida." The accompanying report can be accessed at the following URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3609 There are 12 datasets in this zip file, including 2 Microsoft Excel worksheets (XLSX) and 10 Comma Separated Values (CSV) files. The Microsoft Excel worksheets can be opened using the 2010 and 2016 versions of Microsoft Word, the CSV files can be opened using most text editors.

  3. O

    System Reliability

    • data.austintexas.gov
    • datahub.austintexas.gov
    • +4more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Dec 9, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Austin, Texas - data.austintexas.gov (2022). System Reliability [Dataset]. https://data.austintexas.gov/Utilities-and-City-Services/System-Reliability/ddh8-gyev
    Explore at:
    csv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxml, xml, tsv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 9, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Austin, Texas - data.austintexas.gov
    Description

    The target numbers for the average duration of power outages for System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) goals: Prior to 2016: 60.00 minutes; 2016 – 2019: 57.22 minutes; 2020 – 2021: 45.50 minutes; 2022: 57.00 minutes The target numbers for the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) goals or the average number of power outages per customer: Prior to 2018: 0.80; 2018: 0.72; 2019: 0.69 2020 – 2021: 0.57; 2022: 0.72

    The target number for the System Average Transmission Line Performance index (SATLPI) or the 12-month rolling average of the number of transmission line faults per 100 miles is 3.0.

  4. d

    Data from: Pilot Testing of SHRP 2 Reliability Data and Analytical Products:...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.bts.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 7, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Highway Administration (2023). Pilot Testing of SHRP 2 Reliability Data and Analytical Products: Minnesota [supporting datasets] [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/pilot-testing-of-shrp-2-reliability-data-and-analytical-products-minnesota-supporting-data
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Highway Administration
    Description

    The objective of this project was to develop system designs for programs to monitor travel time reliability and to prepare a guidebook that practitioners and others can use to design, build, operate, and maintain such systems. Generally, such travel time reliability monitoring systems will be built on top of existing traffic monitoring systems. The focus of this project was on travel time reliability. The data from the monitoring systems developed in this project – from both public and private sources –included, wherever cost-effective, information on the seven sources of non-recurring congestion. This data was used to construct performance measures or to perform various types of analyses useful for operations management as well as performance measurement, planning, and programming. The datasets in the attached ZIP file support SHRP 2 reliability project L38B, "Pilot testing of SHRP 2 reliability data and analytical products: Minnesota." This report can be accessed via the following URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3608 This ZIP file package, which is 22.1 MB in size, contains 6 Microsoft Excel spreadsheet files (XLSX). This file package also contains 3 Comma Separated Value files (CSV). The XLSX and CSV files can be opened using Microsoft Excel 2010 and 2016. The CSV files can be opened using most available text editing programs.

  5. Reliability revenue 2019-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 1, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Reliability revenue 2019-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1508543/reliability-revenue/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The revenue of Reliability with headquarters in the United States amounted to 549.3 million U.S. dollars in 2023. The reported fiscal year ends on December 31.Compared to the earliest depicted value from 2019 this is a total increase by approximately 232.95 million U.S. dollars. The trend from 2019 to 2023 shows, however, that this increase did not happen continuously.

  6. Data from: Pilot Testing of SHRP 2 Reliability Data and Analytical Products:...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.bts.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Highway Administration (2023). Pilot Testing of SHRP 2 Reliability Data and Analytical Products: Washington [supporting datasets] [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/pilot-testing-of-shrp-2-reliability-data-and-analytical-products-washington-supporting-dat
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Highway Administrationhttps://highways.dot.gov/
    Description

    The Washington site used the reliability guide from Project L02, analysis tools for forecasting reliability and estimating impacts from Project L07, Project L08, and Project C11 as well as the guide on reliability performance measures from the Project L05 product. The Washington site focused on the I-5 and I-405 corridors from Lynnwood to Tukwila (approximately 30 miles long for each corridor running through the Puget Sound metropolitan region), and the SR-522 urban arterial near Seattle. The pilot testing demonstrated that the SHRP 2 Reliability data and analytical products clearly addressed the practical challenges that transportation agencies face when monitoring and analyzing travel time reliability. However, most tools require significant improvements at the application level. Project L38D was intended to evaluate a suite of projects to determine their readiness for implementation. Those projects had a logical structure consisting of data collection, analysis, and project prioritization. The datasets in this zip file, which is 90.5 MB in size, are in support of SHRP 2 reliability project L38D, "Pilot testing of SHRP 2 reliability data and analytical products: Washington." The project report can be accessed via the following URL: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3610 This zip file contains 20 Comma Separated Values (CSV) files, which can be opened using most text editing programs.

  7. Adoption of AI-related reliability measures 2024, by region

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Adoption of AI-related reliability measures 2024, by region [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1472032/ai-reliability-measures-by-region/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of 2024, the Latin America was the region with the largest share of organizations with fully operationalized reliability measures worldwide. About 15 percent of the respondents in this industry reported to have fully operationalized at least 50 percent of the listed measures to mitigate reliability risks across the development, deployment, and use of artificial intelligence (AI) — from these, about six percent claim to have fully operationalized all the listed measures. Nevertheless, Europe was the one with the highest overall adoption of AI-related reliability measures by the surveyed organizations, having an average of 2.27 adopted measures.

  8. f

    Reliability Data: Repeated Measured Degradation Data

    • iastate.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 11, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    William Meeker; Luis Escobar; Francis Pascual (2021). Reliability Data: Repeated Measured Degradation Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25380/iastate.14454765.v1
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 11, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Iowa State University
    Authors
    William Meeker; Luis Escobar; Francis Pascual
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In some reliability studies, the natural response is measured degradation (either performance degradation or physical/chemical degradation), as opposed to the traditional failure-time reliability data. Examples include light output from LEDs and lasers. crack length, and the amount of wear. Laboratory degradation tests are typically accelerated by increasing a variable like temperature to increase the degradation rate. Before statistical methods had been developed for repeated measured degradation data, it was common practice to wait for enough units to actually fail and then use statistical methods for failure-time data (Device-A in Chapter 18 of SMRD2 is such an example). There are, however, important advantages for direct modeling and analysis of repeated measures degradation data. In particular, it is possible to make reliability inferences with few or no observed failures and the degradation data contain useful information for checking important model assumptions.

  9. m

    EESQ and EESQ-M reliability and validity raw data

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Dec 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    nik nasihah nik ramli (2024). EESQ and EESQ-M reliability and validity raw data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/ct74hk8wbw.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 2, 2024
    Authors
    nik nasihah nik ramli
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The dataset contains raw data from the pilot study samples used for the validity and reliability testing of the Environmental Enrichment Scale Questionnaire (EESQ) and its translated Malay version (EESQ-M).

  10. Local Reliability Areas

    • data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +3more
    html
    Updated Jan 24, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Energy Commission (2022). Local Reliability Areas [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/local-reliability-areas
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Energy Commissionhttp://www.energy.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    California Local Reliability Areas.

  11. o

    WMATA Rail Fleet Reliability

    • me1.opendatasoft.com
    csv, excel, json
    Updated Mar 6, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2017). WMATA Rail Fleet Reliability [Dataset]. https://me1.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/wmata-rail-fleet-reliability/
    Explore at:
    excel, json, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 6, 2017
    Description

    There is no description for this dataset.

  12. Relevance of reliability risks for organizations in 2024, by region

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Relevance of reliability risks for organizations in 2024, by region [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1465369/reliability-ai-risk-relevance/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    Latin American organizations have by far the lowest concerns regarding reliability risks with AI in 2024. This was in stark contrast to the rest of the world, where 55 percent of respondents said reliability was relevant to their organization.

  13. Reliability total equity 2019-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 1, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Reliability total equity 2019-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1508581/reliability-total-equity/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The total equity of Reliability with headquarters in the United States amounted to -303.3 million U.S. dollars in 2023. The reported fiscal year ends on December 31.Compared to the earliest depicted value from 2019 this is a total decrease by approximately 640.54 million U.S. dollars. The trend from 2019 to 2023 shows, furthermore, that this decrease happened continuously.

  14. Analytical Procedures for Determining the Impacts of Reliability Mitigation...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.bts.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Federal Highway Administration (2023). Analytical Procedures for Determining the Impacts of Reliability Mitigation Strategies [supporting datasets] [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/analytical-procedures-for-determining-the-impacts-of-reliability-mitigation-strategies-sup
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Highway Administrationhttps://highways.dot.gov/
    Description

    The objective of this project was to develop technical relationships between reliability improvement strategies and reliability performance metrics. This project defined reliability, explained the importance of travel time distributions for measuring reliability, and recommended specific reliability performance measures. The research reexamined the contribution of the various causes of nonrecurring congestion on urban freeway sections, however, some attention was also given to rural highways and urban arterials). Numerous actions that can potentially reduce nonrecurring congestion were identified with an indication of their relative importance. Models for predicting nonrecurring congestion were developed using three methods, all based on empirical procedures: The first involved before and after studies; the second was termed a 'data poor' approach and resulted in a parsimonious and easy-to-apply set of models; the third was entitled a 'data rich model' and used cross-section inputs including data on selected factors known to directly affect nonrecurring congestion. An important conclusion of the study is that actions to improve operations, reduce demand, and increase capacity all can improve travel time reliability. The 3 attached zip files contains comma separated value (.csv) files of data to support SHRP 2 report S2-L03-RR-1, Analytical procedures for determining the impacts of reliability mitigation strategies.Zip size is 1.83 MB. Files were accessed in Microsoft Excel 2016. Data will be preserved as is. To view publication see: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3605

  15. Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Phase 3 Gearbox 3 Test

    • osti.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +3more
    Updated Dec 28, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Keller, Jonathan (2016). Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Phase 3 Gearbox 3 Test [Dataset]. https://www.osti.gov/dataexplorer/biblio/1337868-gearbox-reliability-collaborative-phase-gearbox-test
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 28, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Energyhttp://energy.gov/
    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energyhttp://energy.gov/eere
    National Renewable Energy Laboratory - Data (NREL-DATA), Golden, CO (United States); National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
    Authors
    Keller, Jonathan
    Description

    The GRC uses a combined gearbox testing, modeling, and analysis approach disseminating data and results to the industry and facilitating improvement of gearbox reliability. This test data describes the tests of GRC gearbox 3 in the National Wind Technology Center dynamometer and documents any modifications to the original test plan. It serves as a guide to interpret the publicly released data sets with brief analyses to illustrate the data. TDMS viewer and Solidworks software required to view data files. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Gearbox Reliability Collaborative (GRC) was established by the U.S. Department of Energy in 2006; its key goal is to understand the root causes of premature gearbox failures and improve their reliability.

  16. Reliability of information.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Christiane Bozoyan; Sonja Vogt (2023). Reliability of information. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149542.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Christiane Bozoyan; Sonja Vogt
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Reliability of information.

  17. D

    RTSP - Reliability Score

    • catalog.dvrpc.org
    • dvrpc-dvrpcgis.opendata.arcgis.com
    esri feature class +4
    Updated Feb 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DVRPC (2025). RTSP - Reliability Score [Dataset]. https://catalog.dvrpc.org/dataset/rtsp-reliability-score
    Explore at:
    html, xml, geojson, json, esri feature classAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    DVRPC
    Description

    The Reliability Score layer shows the results of combining TTI, OTP, and scheduled speed to calculate the overall measure of reliability. A high reliability score (reliscore) is indicative of segments that may benefit from targeted improvements to improve transit operations. The Reliability Score was weighted by ridership (riderrelis) to highlight segments that impact high ridership surface transit service and allow for prioritization of improvements.

  18. Incorporating travel time reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual...

    • data.virginia.gov
    • data.bts.gov
    • +4more
    zip
    Updated Dec 20, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S Department of Transportation (2016). Incorporating travel time reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual [supporting datasets] [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/incorporating-travel-time-reliability-into-the-highway-capacity-manual-supporting-datasets
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    Federal Highway Administrationhttps://highways.dot.gov/
    Authors
    U.S Department of Transportation
    Description

    The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) historically has been among the most important reference guides used by transportation professionals seeking a systematic basis for evaluating the capacity, level of service, and performance measures for elements of the surface transportation system, particularly highways but also other modes. The objective of this project was to determine how data and information on the impacts of differing causes of nonrecurrent congestion (incidents, weather, work zones, special events, etc.) in the context of highway capacity can be incorporated into the performance measure estimation procedures contained in the HCM. The methodologies contained in the HCM for predicting delay, speed, queuing, and other performance measures for alternative highway designs are not currently sensitive to traffic management techniques and other operation/design measures for reducing nonrecurrent congestion. A further objective was to develop methodologies to predict travel time reliability on selected types of facilities and within corridors. This project developed new analytical procedures and prepared chapters about freeway facilities and urban streets for potential incorporation of travel-time reliability into the HCM. The methods are embodied in two computational engines, and a final report documents the research. This zip file contains comma separated value (.csv) files of data to support SHRP 2 report S2-L08-RW-1, Incorporating travel time reliability into the Highway Capacity Manual. Zip size is 1.83 MB. Files were accessed in Microsoft Excel 2016. Data will be preserved as is. To view publication see: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/3606

  19. b

    Drone Reliability Experiment/52 - Datasets - data.bris

    • data.bris.ac.uk
    Updated Dec 12, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). Drone Reliability Experiment/52 - Datasets - data.bris [Dataset]. https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/2a533160949ec3e54876e8031aef8a82
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2023
    Description

    rosbag2_2022_12_13-14_34_28

  20. b

    Drone Reliability Experiment/1 - Datasets - data.bris

    • data.bris.ac.uk
    Updated Dec 9, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). Drone Reliability Experiment/1 - Datasets - data.bris [Dataset]. https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/c9c104e4c7b3171d08c17943b6d035db
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 9, 2023
    Description

    clover14_15_47_40_csv rosbag2_2022_12_02-15_45_26

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
William Meeker; Luis Escobar; Francis Pascual (2021). Reliability Data: Laboratory Failure-Time and Single-Time Strength Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25380/iastate.14454753.v1

Reliability Data: Laboratory Failure-Time and Single-Time Strength Data

Explore at:
pdfAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 11, 2021
Dataset provided by
Iowa State University
Authors
William Meeker; Luis Escobar; Francis Pascual
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Reliability tests are commonly used in product design and manufacturing processes to assure the reliability of components, subsystems, and, in some cases, complete systems. Typical responses are time to failure (either in terms of operating time or number of cycle of operation) or strength or other critical material properties. Virtually alllaboratory reliability tests are accelerated (e.g., by testing at an increases cycling rate or at higher-than-usual levels of temperature or voltage) so that information is obtained in a timely manner. The resulting test data are often censored because not all units fail by the end of the test.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu