Use of government aircraft by senior Federal officials and non-Federal travelers. Redacted data is publicly available on GSA's FOIA Electronic Reading room. Use of premium class (i.e., business class, first class) transportation accommodations. Redacted data is publicly available on GSA's FOIA Electronic Reading room.

This dataset summarizes the impact of federal policy and funding changes on nonprofits, municipalities, and businesses in Connecticut, as reported in the Connecticut Office of Policy and Management's Federal Impact Reporting Tool: https://www.appsvcs.opm.ct.gov/FedImpact

This dataset shows the count of reported incidents grouped by state agency and is based on the main Federal Impact Reporting dataset here: https://data.ct.gov/Government/Federal-Impact-Reporting/cyas-fb55/about_data

Impacts reported include funding reductions, pauses and delays in accessing funds, as well as employment reductions, and impacts from tariffs.

Duplicate responses to the survey have been removed from this dataset.

More information on the Federal Impact Reporting Tool can be found here: https://portal.ct.gov/governor/news/press-releases/2025/04-2025/governor-lamont-launches-reporting-tool-for-entities-impacted-by-recent-federal-actions

This dataset summarizes the impact of federal policy and funding changes on nonprofits, municipalities, and businesses in Connecticut, as reported in the Connecticut Office of Policy and Management's Federal Impact Reporting Tool: https://www.appsvcs.opm.ct.gov/FedImpact

Impacts reported include funding reductions, pauses and delays in accessing funds, as well as employment reductions, and impacts from tariffs.

Additional tables summarizing the incidents by problem experienced and state agency are available at the links below:

Federal Impact Reporting: Incidents by State Agency - https://data.ct.gov/Government/Federal-Impact-Reporting-Incidents-by-State-Agency/9d7b-7key/about_data Federal Impact Reporting: Incidents by Problem Experienced - https://data.ct.gov/Government/Federal-Impact-Reporting-Incidents-by-Problem-Expe/eubu-yyxh/about_data

Duplicate responses to the survey have been removed from this dataset.

More information on the Federal Impact Reporting Tool can be found here: https://portal.ct.gov/governor/news/press-releases/2025/04-2025/governor-lamont-launches-reporting-tool-for-entities-impacted-by-recent-federal-actions

Agency-level reports that external federal oversight entities such as the White House, Congress, OMB, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), and General Services Administration (GSA), require under authorities such as (but not limited to) OMB Circular A-123, the Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA), the Chief Financial Officers Act (CFOA), the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), Joint Committee on Printing requirements, and the FAIR Act. Examples include:rn- Agency Financial Report (AFR)rn- Statement of Assurance (per FMFIA), or equivalent rn- information collection clearancesrn- report on financial management systems’ compliance with requirements (per FMFIA), or equivalentrn- report on internal controls for corporations covered by the Government Corporation Control Act (per CFOA) rn- EEOC reports rn- Analysis and Action Plans and other reports required by EEOC’s MD 715rn- No FEAR Act reportsrn- service organization auditor report, or equivalentrn- improper payments report rn- premium class travel report rn- report on property provided to non-federal recipients, schools, and nonprofit educational institutionsrn- feeder reports to the Status of Telework in the Federal Government Report to Congressrn- feeder reports to GSA fleet reports

The Federal Government Software market, currently valued at approximately $5.3 billion (2025), is experiencing robust growth, projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 13.1% from 2025 to 2033. This significant expansion is driven by several key factors. Increased government digitization initiatives, a growing need for enhanced cybersecurity measures, and the rising demand for efficient data management and analysis solutions are all contributing to market growth. Furthermore, the increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions and the development of sophisticated software applications tailored to specific governmental needs are fueling this expansion. The market's competitive landscape includes established players like Salesforce and Oracle, alongside specialized providers like CentralSquare Technologies and FiscalNote, catering to the unique requirements of various federal agencies. This competition fosters innovation and drives the development of more effective and user-friendly software solutions. The market segmentation, while not explicitly provided, can be reasonably inferred. Likely segments include software solutions for citizen engagement, public safety, financial management, and regulatory compliance. Geographic distribution likely shows a concentration in North America, followed by Europe and other regions. However, the global nature of data sharing and the increasing international collaborations among governments suggest a gradual expansion into other regions over the forecast period. Restraining factors might include budgetary constraints within government agencies, the complexity of integrating new software into existing legacy systems, and concerns about data security and privacy. Despite these challenges, the overall market outlook remains positive, indicating substantial growth opportunities for both established and emerging players in the Federal Government Software market.

The global Federal Government Software market is expected to grow from USD 11,290 million in 2023 to USD 21,700 million by 2033, at a CAGR of 7.6% during the forecast period (2023-2033). Rising adoption of cloud-based solutions and increasing need for data management and security in government organizations are the key factors driving the growth of the Federal Government Software market. Furthermore, increasing government expenditure on IT infrastructure and initiatives to improve efficiency and transparency in government operations are also contributing to the market growth. North America is the largest regional market for Federal Government Software, followed by Europe and Asia-Pacific. The US is the major contributor to the North American market, owing to the presence of a large number of government agencies and the early adoption of advanced technologies. Europe is the second-largest regional market, with the UK and Germany being the key contributors. Asia-Pacific is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, due to the increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions and the growing number ofgovernment initiatives to improve efficiency and transparency. Key players in the Federal Government Software market include CentralSquare Technologies, Quest Software, Salesforce, AMCAD, JustFOIA, Oracle, cFive Solutions, JB Management, FiscalNote, ER Assist Disaster Funding Solutions, Federal Compass, Fedmine, Granicus, MSF&W, Price Reporter, among others.

Graph and download economic data for Current Employment; Percent Reporting Decreases for Federal Reserve District 3: Philadelphia (NECDNA156MNFRBPHI) from May 1968 to Jun 2025 about FRB PHI District, percent, employment, and USA.

Graph and download economic data for U.S.-Chartered Depository Institutions; Balances Due from Federal Reserve Banks; Asset (Call Report), Transactions (BOGZ1FA763013000A) from 1946 to 2024 about U.S.-chartered, fees, transactions, balance, assets, banks, depository institutions, and USA.

Data on federal government expenditures or obligations in state, county, and subcounty areas of the United States, including the District of Columbia and U.S. Outlying Areas. It contains statistics on the geographic distribution of federal program expenditures, using data submitted by federal departments and agencies.

The Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2013 (DICRA) requires the head of each federal law enforcement agency to submit to the U.S. attorney general, information about the death of any person who is detained, under arrest, or in the process of being arrested by a federal law enforcement officer (or by a state or local law enforcement officer while participating in a federal law enforcement operation, task force, or other capacity) being transported to, incarcerated at, or detained at any facility (including immigration or juvenile facilities) pursuant to a contract with a federal law enforcement agency, state or local government facility used by a federal law enforcement agency, or federal correctional or pre-trial detention facility located within the United States (Death in Custody Reporting Act of 2013, P.L. 113-242). The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) created the Federal Deaths in Custody Reporting Program (FDCRP) to collect the data required of federal law enforcement agencies. Federal law enforcement agencies are surveyed on an annual basis about deaths that fall under the scope of DICRA. This data collection includes the 2018-2019 Arrest-Related Death Incident Report (CJ-13A) data and the 2018-2019 Detention/Incarceration Incident Report (CJ-13B) data.

Graph and download economic data for Time Deposits, Reporting Member Banks, Federal Reserve System for United States (M1479CUSM027NNBR) from Jul 1946 to Feb 1953 about deposits, banks, depository institutions, and USA.

Global Federal Government Software market size 2025 was XX Million. Federal Government Software Industry compound annual growth rate (CAGR) will be XX% from 2025 till 2033.

Graph and download economic data for Current Number of Full-Time Permanent Employees; Percent of Respondents Reporting Decreases for Federal Reserve District 3: Philadelphia (NFBNDEC156MSFRBPHI) from Mar 2011 to Jul 2025 about FRB PHI District, full-time, percent, services, employment, and USA.

Data were obtained from reporting systems which exist in various Federal government agencies. The CFFR covers Federal expenditures or obligations for the following categories: grants, salaries and wages, procurement contracts, direct payments for individuals, direct loans, guaranteed or insured loans and insurance. Dollar amounts reported represent actual expenditures or obligations.

Progress Needed on Identifying Expenditures, Building and Utilizing a Data Infrastructure, and Reducing Duplicative Efforts The federal government collects, maintains, and uses geospatial information—data linked to specific geographic locations—to help support varied missions, including national security and natural resources conservation. To coordinate geospatial activities, in 1994 the President issued an executive order to develop a National Spatial Data Infrastructure—a framework for coordination that includes standards, data themes, and a clearinghouse. GAO was asked to review federal and state coordination of geospatial data. GAO’s objectives were to (1) describe the geospatial data that selected federal agencies and states use and how much is spent on geospatial data; (2) assess progress in establishing the National Spatial Data Infrastructure; and (3) determine whether selected federal agencies and states invest in duplicative geospatial data. To do so, GAO identified federal and state uses of geospatial data; evaluated available cost data from 2013 to 2015; assessed FGDC’s and selected agencies’ efforts to establish the infrastructure; and analyzed federal and state datasets to identify duplication. What GAO Found Federal agencies and state governments use a variety of geospatial datasets to support their missions. For example, after Hurricane Sandy in 2012, the Federal Emergency Management Agency used geospatial data to identify 44,000 households that were damaged and inaccessible and reported that, as a result, it was able to provide expedited assistance to area residents. Federal agencies report spending billions of dollars on geospatial investments; however, the estimates are understated because agencies do not always track geospatial investments. For example, these estimates do not include billions of dollars spent on earth-observing satellites that produce volumes of geospatial data. The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) have started an initiative to have agencies identify and report annually on geospatial-related investments as part of the fiscal year 2017 budget process. FGDC and selected federal agencies have made progress in implementing their responsibilities for the National Spatial Data Infrastructure as outlined in OMB guidance; however, critical items remain incomplete. For example, the committee established a clearinghouse for records on geospatial data, but the clearinghouse lacks an effective search capability and performance monitoring. FGDC also initiated plans and activities for coordinating with state governments on the collection of geospatial data; however, state officials GAO contacted are generally not satisfied with the committee’s efforts to coordinate with them. Among other reasons, they feel that the committee is focused on a federal perspective rather than a national one, and that state recommendations are often ignored. In addition, selected agencies have made limited progress in their own strategic planning efforts and in using the clearinghouse to register their data to ensure they do not invest in duplicative data. For example, 8 of the committee’s 32 member agencies have begun to register their data on the clearinghouse, and they have registered 59 percent of the geospatial data they deemed critical. Part of the reason that agencies are not fulfilling their responsibilities is that OMB has not made it a priority to oversee these efforts. Until OMB ensures that FGDC and federal agencies fully implement their responsibilities, the vision of improving the coordination of geospatial information and reducing duplicative investments will not be fully realized. OMB guidance calls for agencies to eliminate duplication, avoid redundant expenditures, and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the sharing and dissemination of geospatial data. However, some data are collected multiple times by federal, state, and local entities, resulting in duplication in effort and resources. A new initiative to create a national address database could potentially result in significant savings for federal, state, and local governments. However, agencies face challenges in effectively coordinating address data collection efforts, including statutory restrictions on sharing certain federal address data. Until there is effective coordination across the National Spatial Data Infrastructure, there will continue to be duplicative efforts to obtain and maintain these data at every level of government.https://www.gao.gov/assets/d15193.pdfWhat GAO Recommends GAO suggests that Congress consider assessing statutory limitations on address data to foster progress toward a national address database. GAO also recommends that OMB improve its oversight of FGDC and federal agency initiatives, and that FGDC and selected agencies fully implement initiatives. The agencies generally agreed with the recommendations and identified plans to implement them.

This dataset provides contact information and agency roles for reporting nursing home abuse at the federal, state, and local levels. It includes contact details for Adult Protective Services, long-term care ombudsman programs, CMS, and law enforcement.

The Federal Equal Treatment Report has been published in a 2-year cycle since 1996. The legal basis for this is §12a of the Federal Equal Treatment Act (B-GlBG). As a result, the Federal Government has to submit a comprehensive report on equal treatment to the National Council every second year. The aim of this report is to inform about the state of play of equal treatment and promotion of women in the Federal Service and the activities of the Federal Equal Treatment Commission.

In December 2011 the NSTC released Trustworthy Cyberspace: Strategic Plan for the Federal Cybersecurity Research and Development Program, outlining a vision for the research needed to develop game-changing technologies to neutralize attacks on the cyber systems of today, and to establish scientific foundations to meet the challenges of securing the cyber systems of tomorrow. The Strategic Plan surfaced intersections of common interest and mutual benefit in cybersecurity research; outlined specific research and development areas that span multiple disciplines; and emphasized collaboration among researchers and technical experts in government, industry, academia, and international contexts...

The FOIA requires each federal agency to submit an Annual Report to the Attorney General each year. These reports contain detailed statistics on the numbers of requests received and processed by each agency, the time taken to respond, and the outcome of each request, as well as many other vital statistics regarding the administration of the FOIA at federal departments and agencies.

The employees of Comision Federal with headquarters in Mexico amounted to ***** thousand in 2023. The reported fiscal year ends on December 31.Compared to the earliest depicted value from 2019 this is a total increase by approximately **** thousand. The trend from 2019 to 2023 shows, however, that this increase did not happen continuously.