Analysis of ‘Popular Website Traffic Over Time ’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/yamqwe/popular-website-traffice on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

About this dataset

Background

Have you every been in a conversation and the question comes up, who uses Bing? This question comes up occasionally because people wonder if these sites have any views. For this research study, we are going to be exploring popular website traffic for many popular websites.

Methodology

The data collected originates from SimilarWeb.com.

Source

For the analysis and study, go to The Concept Center

This dataset was created by Chase Willden and contains around 0 samples along with 1/1/2017, Social Media, technical information and other features such as: - 12/1/2016 - 3/1/2017 - and more.

How to use this dataset

• Analyze 11/1/2016 in relation to 2/1/2017
• Study the influence of 4/1/2017 on 1/1/2017
• More datasets

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit Chase Willden

Start A New Notebook!

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

The global website visitor tracking software market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for businesses to understand online customer behavior and optimize their digital strategies. The market, estimated at $5 billion in 2025, is projected to expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $15 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors, including the rising adoption of digital marketing strategies, the growing importance of data-driven decision-making, and the increasing sophistication of website visitor tracking tools. Cloud-based solutions dominate the market due to their scalability, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, particularly appealing to Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). However, large enterprises continue to invest significantly in on-premise solutions for enhanced data security and control. The market is highly competitive, with numerous established players and emerging startups offering a range of features and functionalities. Technological advancements, such as AI-powered analytics and enhanced integration with other marketing tools, are shaping the future of the market. The market's geographical distribution reflects the global digital landscape. North America, with its mature digital economy and high adoption rates, holds a significant market share. However, regions like Asia-Pacific are showing rapid growth, driven by increasing internet penetration and digitalization across various industries. Despite the overall positive outlook, challenges such as data privacy regulations and the increasing complexity of website tracking technology are influencing market dynamics. The ongoing competition among vendors necessitates continuous innovation and the development of more user-friendly and insightful tools. The future growth of the website visitor tracking software market is promising, fueled by the continuing importance of data-driven decision-making within marketing and business strategies. A key factor will be the ongoing adaptation to evolving privacy regulations and user expectations.

According to the results of a survey conducted worldwide in 2023, nearly **** of responding digital marketers believed artificial intelligence (AI) would have a positive impact on website search traffic in the next five years. Some ** percent stated AI would have a neutral effect, while ** percent agreed that the technology would negatively impact search traffic.

Mobile accounts for approximately half of web traffic worldwide. In the last quarter of 2024, mobile devices (excluding tablets) generated 62.54 percent of global website traffic. Mobiles and smartphones consistently hoovered around the 50 percent mark since the beginning of 2017, before surpassing it in 2020. Mobile traffic Due to low infrastructure and financial restraints, many emerging digital markets skipped the desktop internet phase entirely and moved straight onto mobile internet via smartphone and tablet devices. India is a prime example of a market with a significant mobile-first online population. Other countries with a significant share of mobile internet traffic include Nigeria, Ghana and Kenya. In most African markets, mobile accounts for more than half of the web traffic. By contrast, mobile only makes up around 45.49 percent of online traffic in the United States. Mobile usage The most popular mobile internet activities worldwide include watching movies or videos online, e-mail usage and accessing social media. Apps are a very popular way to watch video on the go and the most-downloaded entertainment apps in the Apple App Store are Netflix, Tencent Video and Amazon Prime Video.

DataForSEO Labs API offers three powerful keyword research algorithms and historical keyword data:

• Related Keywords from the “searches related to” element of Google SERP. • Keyword Suggestions that match the specified seed keyword with additional words before, after, or within the seed key phrase. • Keyword Ideas that fall into the same category as specified seed keywords. • Historical Search Volume with current cost-per-click, and competition values.

Based on in-market categories of Google Ads, you can get keyword ideas from the relevant Categories For Domain and discover relevant Keywords For Categories. You can also obtain Top Google Searches with AdWords and Bing Ads metrics, product categories, and Google SERP data.

You will find well-rounded ways to scout the competitors:

• Domain Whois Overview with ranking and traffic info from organic and paid search. • Ranked Keywords that any domain or URL has positions for in SERP. • SERP Competitors and the rankings they hold for the keywords you specify. • Competitors Domain with a full overview of its rankings and traffic from organic and paid search. • Domain Intersection keywords for which both specified domains rank within the same SERPs. • Subdomains for the target domain you specify along with the ranking distribution across organic and paid search. • Relevant Pages of the specified domain with rankings and traffic data. • Domain Rank Overview with ranking and traffic data from organic and paid search. • Historical Rank Overview with historical data on rankings and traffic of the specified domain from organic and paid search. • Page Intersection keywords for which the specified pages rank within the same SERP.

All DataForSEO Labs API endpoints function in the Live mode. This means you will be provided with the results in response right after sending the necessary parameters with a POST request.

The limit is 2000 API calls per minute, however, you can contact our support team if your project requires higher rates.

We offer well-rounded API documentation, GUI for API usage control, comprehensive client libraries for different programming languages, free sandbox API testing, ad hoc integration, and deployment support.

We have a pay-as-you-go pricing model. You simply add funds to your account and use them to get data. The account balance doesn't expire.

General data recollected for the studio " Analysis of the Quantitative Impact of Social Networks on Web Traffic of Cybermedia in the 27 Countries of the European Union". Four research questions are posed: what percentage of the total web traffic generated by cybermedia in the European Union comes from social networks? Is said percentage higher or lower than that provided through direct traffic and through the use of search engines via SEO positioning? Which social networks have a greater impact? And is there any degree of relationship between the specific weight of social networks in the web traffic of a cybermedia and circumstances such as the average duration of the user's visit, the number of page views or the bounce rate understood in its formal aspect of not performing any kind of interaction on the visited page beyond reading its content? To answer these questions, we have first proceeded to a selection of the cybermedia with the highest web traffic of the 27 countries that are currently part of the European Union after the United Kingdom left on December 31, 2020. In each nation we have selected five media using a combination of the global web traffic metrics provided by the tools Alexa (https://www.alexa.com/), which ceased to be operational on May 1, 2022, and SimilarWeb (https:// www.similarweb.com/). We have not used local metrics by country since the results obtained with these first two tools were sufficiently significant and our objective is not to establish a ranking of cybermedia by nation but to examine the relevance of social networks in their web traffic. In all cases, cybermedia whose property corresponds to a journalistic company have been selected, ruling out those belonging to telecommunications portals or service providers; in some cases they correspond to classic information companies (both newspapers and televisions) while in others they refer to digital natives, without this circumstance affecting the nature of the research proposed.
Below we have proceeded to examine the web traffic data of said cybermedia. The period corresponding to the months of October, November and December 2021 and January, February and March 2022 has been selected. We believe that this six-month stretch allows possible one-time variations to be overcome for a month, reinforcing the precision of the data obtained. To secure this data, we have used the SimilarWeb tool, currently the most precise tool that exists when examining the web traffic of a portal, although it is limited to that coming from desktops and laptops, without taking into account those that come from mobile devices, currently impossible to determine with existing measurement tools on the market. It includes:

Web traffic general data: average visit duration, pages per visit and bounce rate Web traffic origin by country Percentage of traffic generated from social media over total web traffic Distribution of web traffic generated from social networks Comparison of web traffic generated from social netwoks with direct and search procedures

The global website traffic analysis tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing reliance on digital marketing and the need for businesses of all sizes to understand their online audience. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033, reaching approximately $45 billion by 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions provides scalability and cost-effectiveness for businesses, particularly SMEs seeking affordable analytics. Moreover, the evolution of sophisticated analytics features, including advanced user behavior tracking and predictive analytics, enhances the value proposition for both SMEs and large enterprises. The market is segmented by application (SMEs and large enterprises) and by type (cloud-based and web-based), with cloud-based solutions dominating due to their accessibility and flexibility. Competitive pressures among numerous vendors, including established players like Google Analytics, Semrush, and Ahrefs, as well as emerging niche players, drive innovation and affordability, benefiting users. Geographic distribution shows strong growth across North America and Europe, with Asia-Pacific emerging as a high-growth region. However, factors such as data privacy concerns and the increasing complexity of website analytics can act as potential restraints. Despite these challenges, the continued expansion of e-commerce and digital marketing strategies across various industries will solidify the demand for robust website traffic analysis tools. The market is expected to witness further consolidation through mergers and acquisitions, with leading players investing heavily in research and development to enhance their offerings. The increasing need for real-time data analysis and integration with other marketing automation platforms will further shape market evolution. The emergence of AI-powered analytics, providing predictive insights and automated reporting, is transforming the industry and will continue to drive market expansion in the coming years. This makes this market an attractive landscape for investors and technology providers looking for strong future growth.

As part of measuring impact of the NZThesisProject which uploaded metadata for 66,155 theses to Wikidata between May-July 2022, I looked at web sessions referred from Wikidata and Wikipedia (with Google Scholar as a control) to the New Zealand repositories the theses are held in.CSV files contain raw data downloaded by each library from their repository's Google Analytics account (prior to GA4) using a report on sessions per month with the referrer containing, respectively, "wikidata", "wikipedia", and "scholar.google". PNG files show a visualisation of the results.While there are some spikes in usage, these mostly don't appear to be aligned with the timeframe of the project. The increase in traffic from Wikidata is most likely associated with the project work itself. It may be too early for any effects of increasing the theses' profile to become evident.Thanks for sharing data to: Annabel Gooder (University of Auckland); Rudy bin Mahli (Auckland University of Technology); Anton Angelo (University of Canterbury); Catherine Woeber and Amanda Curnow (Massey University); David Church (Research Bank as part of Te Pūkenga); Max Sullivan (Victoria University of Wellington).

Preliminary research efforts regarding Social Media Platforms and their contribution to website traffic in LAMs. Through the Similar Web API, the leading social networks (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, Instagram, Reddit, Pinterest, LinkedIn) that drove traffic to each one of the 220 cases in our dataset were identified and analyzed in the first sheet. Aggregated results proved that Facebook platform was responsible for 46.1% of social traffic (second sheet).

Web Analytics Market was valued at USD 6.16 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 13.6 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 18.58% from 2026 to 2032.

Web Analytics Market Drivers

Data-Driven Decision Making: Businesses increasingly rely on data-driven insights to optimize their online strategies. Web analytics provides valuable data on website traffic, user behavior, and conversion rates, enabling data-driven decision-making.

E-commerce Growth: The rapid growth of e-commerce has fueled the demand for web analytics tools to track online sales, customer behavior, and marketing campaign effectiveness.

Mobile Dominance: The increasing use of mobile devices for internet browsing has made mobile analytics a crucial aspect of web analytics. Businesses need to understand how users interact with their websites and apps on mobile devices.

analytics tools can be complex to implement and use, requiring technical expertise.

This statistic ranks leading internet brands by average Buzz score in the United Kingdom from January to December 2019. WhatsApp ranked highest with a score of 7.1, followed by eBay and YouTube.

In 2024, the single country with the highest share of online traffic to shein.com was the United States. Brazil followed, ranking second with about 12 percent of shein.com web traffic coming from the country, followed by France with 6.6 percent.

Please refer to the original data article for further data description: Jan Luxemburk et al. CESNET-QUIC22: A large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines, Data in Brief, 2023, 108888, ISSN 2352-3409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888. We recommend using the CESNET DataZoo python library, which facilitates the work with large network traffic datasets. More information about the DataZoo project can be found in the GitHub repository https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo. The QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection) protocol has the potential to replace TLS over TCP, which is the standard choice for reliable and secure Internet communication. Due to its design that makes the inspection of QUIC handshakes challenging and its usage in HTTP/3, there is an increasing demand for research in QUIC traffic analysis. This dataset contains one month of QUIC traffic collected in an ISP backbone network, which connects 500 large institutions and serves around half a million people. The data are delivered as enriched flows that can be useful for various network monitoring tasks. The provided server names and packet-level information allow research in the encrypted traffic classification area. Moreover, included QUIC versions and user agents (smartphone, web browser, and operating system identifiers) provide information for large-scale QUIC deployment studies. Data capture The data was captured in the flow monitoring infrastructure of the CESNET2 network. The capturing was done for four weeks between 31.10.2022 and 27.11.2022. The following list provides per-week flow count, capture period, and uncompressed size:

W-2022-44

Uncompressed Size: 19 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 6.11.2022 Number of flows: 32.6M W-2022-45

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 7.11.2022 - 13.11.2022 Number of flows: 42.6M W-2022-46

Uncompressed Size: 20 GB Capture Period: 14.11.2022 - 20.11.2022 Number of flows: 33.7M W-2022-47

Uncompressed Size: 25 GB Capture Period: 21.11.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 44.1M CESNET-QUIC22

Uncompressed Size: 89 GB Capture Period: 31.10.2022 - 27.11.2022 Number of flows: 153M

Data description The dataset consists of network flows describing encrypted QUIC communications. Flows were created using ipfixprobe flow exporter and are extended with packet metadata sequences, packet histograms, and with fields extracted from the QUIC Initial Packet, which is the first packet of the QUIC connection handshake. The extracted handshake fields are the Server Name Indication (SNI) domain, the used version of the QUIC protocol, and the user agent string that is available in a subset of QUIC communications. Packet Sequences Flows in the dataset are extended with sequences of packet sizes, directions, and inter-packet times. For the packet sizes, we consider payload size after transport headers (UDP headers for the QUIC case). Packet directions are encoded as ±1, +1 meaning a packet sent from client to server, and -1 a packet from server to client. Inter-packet times depend on the location of communicating hosts, their distance, and on the network conditions on the path. However, it is still possible to extract relevant information that correlates with user interactions and, for example, with the time required for an API/server/database to process the received data and generate the response to be sent in the next packet. Packet metadata sequences have a length of 30, which is the default setting of the used flow exporter. We also derive three fields from each packet sequence: its length, time duration, and the number of roundtrips. The roundtrips are counted as the number of changes in the communication direction (from packet directions data); in other words, each client request and server response pair counts as one roundtrip. Flow statistics Flows also include standard flow statistics, which represent aggregated information about the entire bidirectional flow. The fields are: the number of transmitted bytes and packets in both directions, the duration of flow, and packet histograms. Packet histograms include binned counts of packet sizes and inter-packet times of the entire flow in both directions (more information in the PHISTS plugin documentation There are eight bins with a logarithmic scale; the intervals are 0-15, 16-31, 32-63, 64-127, 128-255, 256-511, 512-1024, >1024 [ms or B]. The units are milliseconds for inter-packet times and bytes for packet sizes. Moreover, each flow has its end reason - either it was idle, reached the active timeout, or ended due to other reasons. This corresponds with the official IANA IPFIX-specified values. The FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER field represents the forced end and lack of resources reasons. The end of flow detected reason is not considered because it is not relevant for UDP connections. Dataset structure The dataset flows are delivered in compressed CSV files. CSV files contain one flow per row; data columns are summarized in the provided list below. For each flow data file, there is a JSON file with the number of saved and seen (before sampling) flows per service and total counts of all received (observed on the CESNET2 network), service (belonging to one of the dataset's services), and saved (provided in the dataset) flows. There is also the stats-week.json file aggregating flow counts of a whole week and the stats-dataset.json file aggregating flow counts for the entire dataset. Flow counts before sampling can be used to compute sampling ratios of individual services and to resample the dataset back to the original service distribution. Moreover, various dataset statistics, such as feature distributions and value counts of QUIC versions and user agents, are provided in the dataset-statistics folder. The mapping between services and service providers is provided in the servicemap.csv file, which also includes SNI domains used for ground truth labeling. The following list describes flow data fields in CSV files:

ID: Unique identifier SRC_IP: Source IP address DST_IP: Destination IP address DST_ASN: Destination Autonomous System number SRC_PORT: Source port DST_PORT: Destination port PROTOCOL: Transport protocol QUIC_VERSION QUIC: protocol version QUIC_SNI: Server Name Indication domain QUIC_USER_AGENT: User agent string, if available in the QUIC Initial Packet TIME_FIRST: Timestamp of the first packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff TIME_LAST: Timestamp of the last packet in format YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS.ffffff DURATION: Duration of the flow in seconds BYTES: Number of transmitted bytes from client to server BYTES_REV: Number of transmitted bytes from server to client PACKETS: Number of packets transmitted from client to server PACKETS_REV: Number of packets transmitted from server to client PPI: Packet metadata sequence in the format: [[inter-packet times], [packet directions], [packet sizes]] PPI_LEN: Number of packets in the PPI sequence PPI_DURATION: Duration of the PPI sequence in seconds PPI_ROUNDTRIPS: Number of roundtrips in the PPI sequence PHIST_SRC_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from client to server PHIST_DST_SIZES: Histogram of packet sizes from server to client PHIST_SRC_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from client to server PHIST_DST_IPT: Histogram of inter-packet times from server to client APP: Web service label CATEGORY: Service category FLOW_ENDREASON_IDLE: Flow was terminated because it was idle FLOW_ENDREASON_ACTIVE: Flow was terminated because it reached the active timeout FLOW_ENDREASON_OTHER: Flow was terminated for other reasons

Link to other CESNET datasets

https://www.liberouter.org/technology-v2/tools-services-datasets/datasets/ https://github.com/CESNET/cesnet-datazoo Please cite the original data article:

@article{CESNETQUIC22, author = {Jan Luxemburk and Karel Hynek and Tomáš Čejka and Andrej Lukačovič and Pavel Šiška}, title = {CESNET-QUIC22: a large one-month QUIC network traffic dataset from backbone lines}, journal = {Data in Brief}, pages = {108888}, year = {2023}, issn = {2352-3409}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.108888}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340923000069} }

This data set contains internet traffic data captured by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) using Mikrotik SDN Controller and packet sniffer tools. The data set includes traffic from over 2000 customers who use Fibre to the Home (FTTH) and Gpon internet connections. The data was collected over a period of several months and contains all traffic in its original format with headers and packets.

The data set contains information on inbound and outbound traffic, including web browsing, email, file transfers, and more. The data set can be used for research in areas such as network security, traffic analysis, and machine learning.

**Data Collection Method: ** The data was captured using Mikrotik SDN Controller and packet sniffer tools. These tools capture traffic data by monitoring network traffic in real-time. The data set contains all traffic data in its original format, including headers and packets.

**Data Set Content: ** The data set is provided in a CSV format and includes the following fields:

1. Timestamp: The date and time the traffic was captured
2. Source IP Address: The IP address of the device that sent the traffic Destination IP Address: The IP address of the device that received the traffic Protocol: The network protocol used for the traffic (e.g. TCP, UDP) Source Port: The port used by the source device for the traffic Destination Port: The port used by the destination device for the traffic Packet Size: The size of the packet in bytes Payload: The payload data of the packet The data set contains a large volume of traffic data from over 2000 customers. The data is organized by timestamp and includes all traffic data in its original format, including headers and packets. The data set contains both inbound and outbound traffic, and covers various types of internet traffic, including web browsing, email, file transfers, and more. one of listed protocols: ipsec-ah - IPsec AH protocol *ipsec-esp - IPsec ESP protocol ddp - datagram delivery protocol egp - exterior gateway protocol ggp - gateway-gateway protocol gre - general routing encapsulation hmp - host monitoring protocol idpr-cmtp - idpr control message transport icmp - internet control message protocol icmpv6 - internet control message protocol v6 igmp - internet group management protocol ipencap - ip encapsulated in ip ipip - ip encapsulation encap - ip encapsulation iso-tp4 - iso transport protocol class 4 ospf - open shortest path first pup - parc universal packet protocol pim - protocol independent multicast rspf - radio shortest path first rdp - reliable datagram protocol st - st datagram mode tcp - transmission control protocol udp - user datagram protocol vmtp - versatile message transport vrrp - virtual router redundancy protocol xns-idp - xerox xns idp xtp - xpress transfer protocol

MAC Protocol Examples 802.2 - 802.2 Frames (0x0004) arp - Address Resolution Protocol (0x0806) homeplug-av - HomePlug AV MME (0x88E1) ip - Internet Protocol version 4 (0x0800) ipv6 - Internet Protocol Version 6 (0x86DD) ipx - Internetwork Packet Exchange (0x8137) lldp - Link Layer Discovery Protocol (0x88CC) loop-protect - Loop Protect Protocol (0x9003) mpls-multicast - MPLS multicast (0x8848) mpls-unicast - MPLS unicast (0x8847) packing-compr - Encapsulated packets with compressed IP packing (0x9001) packing-simple - Encapsulated packets with simple IP packing (0x9000) pppoe - PPPoE Session Stage (0x8864) pppoe-discovery - PPPoE Discovery Stage (0x8863) rarp - Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (0x8035) service-vlan - Provider Bridging (IEEE 802.1ad) & Shortest Path Bridging IEEE 802.1aq (0x88A8) vlan - VLAN-tagged frame (IEEE 802.1Q) and Shortest Path Bridging IEEE 802.1aq with NNI compatibility (0x8100)

**Data Usage: ** The data set can be used for research in areas such as network security, traffic analysis, and machine learning. Researchers can use the data to develop new algorithms for detecting and preventing cyber attacks, analyzing internet traffic patterns, and more.

**Data Availability: ** If you are interested in using this data set for research purposes, please contact us at asfandyar250@gmail.com for more information and references. The data set is available for download on Kaggle and can be accessed by researchers who have obtained permission from the ISP.

We hope this data set will be useful for researchers in the field of network security and traffic analysis. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to contact us. https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F5985737%2F61c81ce9eb393f8fc7c15540c9819b95%2FData.PNG?generation=1683750473536727&alt=media" alt=""> You can use Wireshark or other software's to view files

Businesses, researchers, and developers often seek out web activity datasets and databases to: Understand consumer behavior. Train machine learning models. Perform market research or competitor analysis. Optimize user experience on websites. Personalize content and advertising. This data can be used for a variety of different use cases

As of March 2024, mobile phones accounted for approximately 68.8 percent of the total web traffic in Asia. That was a slight increase from the previous year when mobile phones made up about 68 percent of the total web traffic in the region.

The global website analytics tool market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for businesses of all sizes to understand their online audience and optimize their digital strategies. The market, valued at approximately $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 to 2033. This substantial growth is fueled by several key factors. The rising adoption of cloud-based solutions offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and accessibility for businesses, regardless of their technical expertise. Furthermore, the expanding use of mobile devices and the proliferation of data are creating a surge in demand for sophisticated analytics tools capable of providing real-time insights into user behavior, campaign performance, and website effectiveness. The market is segmented by deployment (cloud-based and on-premises) and user type (SMEs and large enterprises), with the cloud-based segment dominating due to its inherent advantages. Competitive pressures are intensifying, with established players like Google Analytics and Adobe Analytics facing competition from agile startups offering innovative features and pricing models. While data privacy concerns and the complexity of implementing and interpreting analytics data pose challenges, the overall market trajectory remains overwhelmingly positive, underpinned by continued digital transformation across industries and a growing awareness of the importance of data-driven decision-making. The regional distribution of the market reflects the global landscape of digital adoption, with North America and Europe currently holding significant market shares. However, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth in the coming years, driven by rapid economic development and increasing internet penetration. This presents substantial opportunities for both established players and new entrants in the market. The future will likely see further integration of website analytics with other marketing technologies, the rise of AI-powered analytics capabilities offering predictive insights, and a greater emphasis on data security and compliance. This dynamic environment necessitates continuous innovation and adaptation for businesses operating within the website analytics tool market.

In January 2025, desktop devices accounted for around 52 percent of total web pages served to web browsers in Czechia. Mobile devices had a share of over 46 percent. Tablet devices represented approximately 1.66 percent of web traffic.

Snapshot img

Global network traffic analytics Industry Overview

Technavio’s analysts have identified the increasing use of network traffic analytics solutions to be one of major factors driving market growth. With the rapidly changing IT infrastructure, security hackers can steal valuable information through various modes. With the increasing dependence on web applications and websites for day-to-day activities and financial transactions, the instances of theft have increased globally. Also, the emergence of social networking websites has aided the malicious attackers to extract valuable information from vulnerable users. The increasing consumer dependence on web applications and websites for day-to-day activities and financial transactions are further increasing the risks of theft. This encourages the organizations to adopt network traffic analytics solutions.

Want a bigger picture? Try a FREE sample of this report now!

See the complete table of contents and list of exhibits, as well as selected illustrations and example pages from this report.

Companies covered

The network traffic analytics market is fairly concentrated due to the presence of few established companies offering innovative and differentiated software and services. By offering a complete analysis of the competitiveness of the players in the network monitoring tools market offering varied software and services, this network traffic analytics industry analysis report will aid clients identify new growth opportunities and design new growth strategies.

The report offers a complete analysis of a number of companies including:

Allot
Cisco Systems
IBM
Juniper Networks
Microsoft
Symantec

Network traffic analytics market growth based on geographic regions

Americas
APAC
EMEA

With a complete study of the growth opportunities for the companies across regions such as the Americas, APAC, and EMEA, our industry research analysts have estimated that countries in the Americas will contribute significantly to the growth of the network monitoring tools market throughout the predicted period.

Network traffic analytics market growth based on end-user

Telecom
BFSI
Healthcare
Media and entertainment

According to our market research experts, the telecom end-user industry will be the major end-user of the network monitoring tools market throughout the forecast period. Factors such as increasing use of network traffic analytics solutions and increasing use of mobile devices at workplaces will contribute to the growth of the market shares of the telecom industry in the network traffic analytics market.

Key highlights of the global network traffic analytics market for the forecast years 2018-2022:

CAGR of the market during the forecast period 2018-2022
Detailed information on factors that will accelerate the growth of the network traffic analytics market during the next five years
Precise estimation of the global network traffic analytics market size and its contribution to the parent market
Accurate predictions on upcoming trends and changes in consumer behavior
Growth of the network traffic analytics industry across various geographies such as the Americas, APAC, and EMEA
A thorough analysis of the market’s competitive landscape and detailed information on several vendors
Comprehensive information about factors that will challenge the growth of network traffic analytics companies

Get more value with Technavio’s INSIGHTS subscription platform! Gain easy access to all of Technavio’s reports, along with on-demand services. Try the demo

This market research report analyzes the market outlook and provides a list of key trends, drivers, and challenges that are anticipated to impact the global network traffic analytics market and its stakeholders over the forecast years.

The global network traffic analytics market analysts at Technavio have also considered how the performance of other related markets in the vertical will impact the size of this market till 2022. Some of the markets most likely to influence the growth of the network traffic analytics market over the coming years are the Global Network as a Service Market and the Global Data Analytics Outsourcing Market.

Technavio’s collection of market research reports offer insights into the growth of markets across various industries. Additionally, we also provide customized reports based on the specific requirement of our clients.

As of June 2022, Asia was leading by the number of internet users worldwide with nearly 2.9 billion internet users. Europe ranked second, with more than 750 million internet users. Meanwhile, the number of internet users worldwide was 5.47 billion.