The City of Peachtree Corners more closely represents an urban community than it does a traditional suburban market. Current land use within the City is almost evenly split between residential and non-residential uses (51.6%-49.4%). This level of activity is desirable from a fiscal health perspective, as non-residential uses typically generate greater revenues than the cost of services consumed. Of the approximately 55.4 million square feet of taxable building space, slightly more than 21.6 million is for singlefamily residential use (detached houses and townhouses). Warehousing accounts for the second largest total at more than 13.6 million square feet. The diversity of land uses within Peachtree Corners goes beyond the residential/ nonresidential levels. Within the residential market, nearly 25% of the developed space is in multi-family units (quadplexes, apartments, and condominiums), with the vast majority being traditional rental properties. Additionally, retail and services make up less than 13% of the City’s non-residential development. Suburban markets typically have more than 50% of non-residential development in the retail and services category
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This dataset represents the boundaries of residential subdivisions. A subdivision is a named collection of residential lots often with limited and marked points of access. The lots and houses in a subdivision are generally similar in size and value, having been developed duing the same time period and for the same market segment. Subdivisions are important in county operations because they are often used as a locational reference by both the public and county staff. This dataset was initially created from tax assessment records. Landbase_Subdivisions is used to populate a field meant to record a subdivision name in both Trans_AddressPoints and Trans_StreetCenterlines. In both cases, the population of the field is done automatically during the execution of a SQL Server stored procedure as part of the scheduled publication process. The published version of Landbase_Subdivisions is also included in the ArcGIS dynamic map services used in a number of web mapping applications.
This feature service displays residential development located within the Town of Apex corporate limits and extraterritorial jurisdiction. Polygons are drawn based on the approved subdivision plan/major site plan boundaries. Updated recorded surveys may cause development boundaries to vary slightly from the boundaries contained within this feature service. The file includes residential subdivisions; townhome communities; apartments; condominiums; mobile home parks; and approved planned unit developments (PUDs) that have not submitted residential plans for Town review. PUDs are removed from the feature service once master subdivision plans have been approved by the Town. Previous developments that were approved by Wake County prior to October 2007 may have missing data. Exempt subdivisions are excluded.
Residential single- and multi-family subdivision boundaries. Includes residential condominium boundaries.
https://www.durham.ca/en/regional-government/resources/Documents/OpenDataLicenceAgreement.pdfhttps://www.durham.ca/en/regional-government/resources/Documents/OpenDataLicenceAgreement.pdf
Country Residential Subdivision boundaries within Durham Region created for the Regional Official Plan. ROP Consolidation September 3, 2024.History:Dataset originally imported from DetailedGeographies.mdb, on November 14th, 2018. This was completed for time-stamped purposes, as the original dataset can still be subject to change throughout the MCR process. Updates were made in January 2019 based on Area Municipality review/comments. Further cartographic updates were made throughout the MCR process, to ensure boundaries are accurate and consistent throughout the Region.
This dataset includes basic information for all submitted development plans that are approved or under review. Development plans include Preliminary Subdivisions and Administrative Site Reviews.. For additional reports and searches, you can visit Raleigh's online development center: https://energovcitizenaccess.tylertech.com/RaleighNC/SelfServiceUpdate Frequency: DailyTime Period: 1985-Present
A structure plan provides a basis for zoning (including residential density) and subdivision of land. This layer shows Structure plan boundaries. A structure plan provides a basis for zoning (including residential density) and subdivision of land. This layer shows Structure plan boundaries.
This data layer contains polygon features representing the approximate size and location of parcels owned by the federal government located within Prince William County, Virginia. It was created to provide basic information regarding property location and boundaries, and is used as a graphical representation of legally recorded deed and plat documents for properties. Parcel ownership and recordation information is not included in this layer but can be purchased separately from the Office of Real Estate Assessments. Users should be aware that this data does not represent legal property boundary descriptions, nor is it suitable for boundary determination of individual parcels. Any depiction of physical improvements, property lines or boundaries is for general information only and shall not be used for the design modification or construction of improvements to real property or for flood plain determination.
The layer was derived from a variety of source maps including: mylar county parcel maps, plats of surveys, deed descriptions, subdivision maps, and highway right-of-way plats. These source materials were of several different scales and were from dates ranging from the early 1900's to the present.
development_boundary Polygon dataset indicating geographic location of Development Boundaries in the Tendring area.
Upon accessing this Licensed Data you will be deemed to have accepted the terms of the Public Sector End User Licence – INSPIRE
description: The 2014 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The Cartographic boundary shapefiles include both incorporated places (legal entities) and census designated places or CDPs (statistical entities). An incorporated place is established to provide governmental functions for a concentration of people as opposed to a minor civil division (MCD), which generally is created to provide services or administer an area without regard, necessarily, to population. Places always nest within a state, but may extend across county and county subdivision boundaries. An incorporated place usually is a city, town, village, or borough, but can have other legal descriptions. CDPs are delineated for the decennial census as the statistical counterparts of incorporated places. CDPs are delineated to provide data for settled concentrations of population that are identifiable by name, but are not legally incorporated under the laws of the state in which they are located. The boundaries for CDPs often are defined in partnership with state, local, and/or tribal officials and usually coincide with visible features or the boundary of an adjacent incorporated place or another legal entity. CDP boundaries often change from one decennial census to the next with changes in the settlement pattern and development; a CDP with the same name as in an earlier census does not necessarily have the same boundary. The only population/housing size requirement for CDPs is that they must contain some housing and population.; abstract: The 2014 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The Cartographic boundary shapefiles include both incorporated places (legal entities) and census designated places or CDPs (statistical entities). An incorporated place is established to provide governmental functions for a concentration of people as opposed to a minor civil division (MCD), which generally is created to provide services or administer an area without regard, necessarily, to population. Places always nest within a state, but may extend across county and county subdivision boundaries. An incorporated place usually is a city, town, village, or borough, but can have other legal descriptions. CDPs are delineated for the decennial census as the statistical counterparts of incorporated places. CDPs are delineated to provide data for settled concentrations of population that are identifiable by name, but are not legally incorporated under the laws of the state in which they are located. The boundaries for CDPs often are defined in partnership with state, local, and/or tribal officials and usually coincide with visible features or the boundary of an adjacent incorporated place or another legal entity. CDP boundaries often change from one decennial census to the next with changes in the settlement pattern and development; a CDP with the same name as in an earlier census does not necessarily have the same boundary. The only population/housing size requirement for CDPs is that they must contain some housing and population.
This feature indicates the name and geographic extent of all existing and planned major residential subdivisions.
Subdivision, apartment complex, and business/industrial park boundaries in the city of Marietta, Georgia
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Development Plan Map Index is used to determine which map to refer to in South Australian Development Plans. Link: http://www.sa.gov.au/topics/housing-property-and-land/local-government/development-plans/online-development-plans. Every council in South Australia has a Development Plan that specifies the type of development that can occur in that council area.
This web map shows the location of applications for presale consent for non-residential development pending approval in Hong Kong. It is a set of data made available by the Lands Department under the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the "Government") at https://portal.csdi.gov.hk ("CSDI Portal"). The source data has been processed and converted into Esri File Geodatabase format and uploaded to Esri's ArcGIS Online platform for sharing and reference purpose. The objectives are to facilitate our Hong Kong ArcGIS Online users to use the data in a spatial ready format and save their data conversion effort.For details about the data, source format and terms of conditions of usage, please refer to the website of Hong Kong CSDI Portal at https://portal.csdi.gov.hk.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Subdivisions dataset represents the official mapped boundaries of residential, commercial, and mixed-use subdivisions within Navajo County, Arizona. These subdivisions define property divisions, land use designations, and development regulations, shaping community planning, infrastructure expansion, and municipal oversight. Used by government agencies, urban planners, GIS professionals, developers, and property assessors, this dataset supports subdivision mapping, zoning compliance, and real estate administration, ensuring clear and structured land division management.
Note: this layer's data is continuously updated via map service connections to our enterprise geodatabase. This item's "date updated" attribute does not reflect the data within.This data layer contains polygon features representing the approximate size and location of parcels located within Prince William County, Virginia. It was created to provide basic information regarding property location and boundaries, and is used as a graphical representation of legally recorded deed and plat documents for properties. Users should be aware that this data does not represent legal property boundary descriptions, nor is it suitable for boundary determination of individual parcels. The layer was derived from a variety of source maps including: mylar county parcel maps, plats of surveys, deed descriptions, subdivision maps, and highway right-of-way plats. These source materials were of several different scales and were from dates ranging from the early 1900's to the present. The source of each parcel is described in the Source attribute field.Parcel ownership information included in this layer is provided by the Office of Real Estate Assessments from their Real Estate Assessments database. This includes all real properties except public service properties (public roads, operating railroads, interstate pipelines, and public utilities), is assessed annually by the Real Estate Assessments Office, This information is provided nightly and joined to the GIS parcel boundaries by the GPIN.
This layer shows the location of issued presale consent for residential development in Hong Kong. It is a set of data made available by the Lands Department under the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the "Government") at https://portal.csdi.gov.hk ("CSDI Portal"). The source data has been processed and converted into Esri File Geodatabase format and uploaded to Esri's ArcGIS Online platform for sharing and reference purpose. The objectives are to facilitate our Hong Kong ArcGIS Online users to use the data in a spatial ready format and save their data conversion effort.For details about the data, source format and terms of conditions of usage, please refer to the website of Hong Kong CSDI Portal at https://portal.csdi.gov.hk.
Maryland Total Acres Inside Priority Funding Areas (PFA) for residential development from 2012 through and including 2022 based on the PFA boundaries and MdProperty View Edition year data referenced below. PFAs are existing communities and places where local governments want State investment to support future growth. 2006-2022 Data Sources: • PFA boundaries dated 08/21/2014 • MdProperty View 2012 Edition for all jurisdictions except Allegany and Garrett counties, which are based on MdProperty View 2011 Edition updated with August 2014 parcel data from the State Department of Assessments and Taxation. 2013-2015 Data Sources: • PFA boundaries dated 08/29/2016 • MdProperty View 2013/14 Edition parcel data for all jurisdictions in Maryland except the following: Baltimore, Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Harford, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Talbot, and Wicomico counties and Baltimore City, 2013/2014 Edition data updated with June 2016 parcel data from Assessments, and Anne Arundel and Carroll Counties, 2012 Edition data updated with June 2016 parcel data from Assessments. For new parcels included in the June 2016 update, parcel point placement was done via geocoding and not via placement by deed and/or plat.
Subdivisions labeling points located within subdivision boundary
This layer groups individual parcel boundaries into the named subdivisions that they are considered to be a part of. Note that this layer only includes particular residential subdivisions and not commercial property like businesses or apartment complexes.
The City of Peachtree Corners more closely represents an urban community than it does a traditional suburban market. Current land use within the City is almost evenly split between residential and non-residential uses (51.6%-49.4%). This level of activity is desirable from a fiscal health perspective, as non-residential uses typically generate greater revenues than the cost of services consumed. Of the approximately 55.4 million square feet of taxable building space, slightly more than 21.6 million is for singlefamily residential use (detached houses and townhouses). Warehousing accounts for the second largest total at more than 13.6 million square feet. The diversity of land uses within Peachtree Corners goes beyond the residential/ nonresidential levels. Within the residential market, nearly 25% of the developed space is in multi-family units (quadplexes, apartments, and condominiums), with the vast majority being traditional rental properties. Additionally, retail and services make up less than 13% of the City’s non-residential development. Suburban markets typically have more than 50% of non-residential development in the retail and services category