Groundwater in the arid Mountain Home area is vital to agricultural, municipal, industrial and other water users who are concerned about declining groundwater levels. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR), developed a hydrogeologic framework to provide a conceptual understanding of groundwater resources in the Mountain Home area. As part of the hydrogeologic framework, water-table contour and groundwater-level change maps were produced to describe the occurrence, movement, and change in groundwater. Water-table contours for spring 2023 (March 20 to 24, 2023) and autumn 2023 (November 1 to 7, 2023) were created for the regional aquifer and perched groundwater zone in the Mountain Home area. The well numbers and station names for sites used to create the water-table contours and groundwater-level change and groundwater storage change rasters are provided in this data release. The _location, depth to water, and groundwater altitude for these wells can be accessed on USGS National Water Information System (NWIS), IDWR groundwater portal, or an annual water level monitoring report for IDWR permit 61-12090 (HDR, 2024). The interpreted 50-foot contours of the water table are also provided in this data release. The contours are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). The water-table contours are divided into two water-bearing units - regional and perched groundwater zone - based on well depth and groundwater altitude. The water-table contours ranged from 2,350 to 3,650 feet above NAVD 88. The groundwater-level change at well sites from spring to autumn 2023 were interpolated over the study area and are provided in a raster. Groundwater-level change ranged from 22.01 ft decline to 15.44 ft rise. Groundwater-level change was multiplied by hydrogeologic unit storativity to estimate groundwater storage change from spring to autumn 2023. More information on the generation of the water-table contours, groundwater change maps, and perched groundwater delineation and limitations can be found in the companion report, SIR 2024-5124 (Hydrogeologic framework of the Mountain Home area, southern Idaho by L.M. Zinsser and S.D. Ducar).

To ensure the integrity of water well construction and prevent potential pollution of state groundwaters, the OWRB supervises the licensing of water well drillers and pump installers. This program is guided by comprehensive standards developed in cooperation with the Well Drillers Advisory Committee. Licensed drillers are required to submit well logs online or by mail within sixty days of the completion of a new well or plugging or reconditioning of an existing well.Well Driller Licensing Fact Sheet

This dataset provides information submitted by well contractors as prescribed by Regulation 903, and is stored in the Water Well Information System (WWIS). Spatial information for all of the well records reported in Ontario are also provided. Well record map *[WWIS]: Water Well Information System This data is related to: * Well records * Map: Well records * Topic: Drinking water * Law: Reg. 903: Wells Related data: * Petroleum wells

Groundwater Wells and Springs Ireland (ROI) ITM. Published by Geological Survey Ireland. Available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY-4.0).A well is a hole dug into the ground usually for the purpose of taking water from the ground but also for monitoring groundwater. Most private wells are used for home and farm water supplies are in rural areas. Springs occur where groundwater comes out at the surface. A borehole is a hole drilled into the ground to gain access to groundwater. The hole is usually deep, narrow and round.

This map shows the location of the dug wells, springs and boreholes in Ireland. Data was collected by GSI drilling or submitted to the GSI from Local Authorities and other state bodies, Private Well Grants, Drillers, Consultants, Group Water Schemes and Academia. The location accuracy is visually portrayed on the GSI webmapping viewer by the size of the circle displaying the record. It is NOT a comprehensive database and many wells and springs are not included in this database. You should not rely only on this database, and should undertake your own site study for wells in the area of interest if needed.

This map is to the scale 1:100,000. This means it should be viewed at that scale. When printed at that scale 1cm on the map relates to a distance of 1km.

It is a vector dataset. Vector data portray the world using points, lines, and polygons (areas).

The data is shown as polygons. Each polygon holds information on the location of the borehole (X and Y coordinates), Well ID (well identifier), hole details, location details, yield, abstraction ,drilling details....

Pennsylvania Water Wells Points representing approximate locations of water wells within Pennsylvania that are recorded in the Pennsylvania Groundwater Information System (PaGWIS). In addition to identifying and location information, layer attributes include water use, well use, and depth to bedrock (if bedrock was reached). Data does not include public-water supplies. More extensive water-well data can be found by searching for specific water wells on the interactive PaGEODE web-map application at https://gis.dcnr.pa.gov/pageode/.FIELDALIASTYPEDESCRIPTIONPAWellIDPA Well IDStringUnique identifier assigned by PaGWIS to identify the well.CountyCounty NameStringName of the county in which the well is locatedMunicipalityMunicipality NameStringName of the municipality in which the well is locatedQuadrangleQuadrangle NameStringName of the quadrangle in which the well is locatedWell_AddressWell AddressStringStreet address associated with the water-well site as entered on the water-well record by the driller.Well_Zip_CodeWell Zip CodeStringZip code where the well is locatedLatitudeDDLatitudeDoubleLatitude (in decimal degrees) where the well is locatedLongitudeDDLongitudeDoubleLongitude (in decimal degrees) where the well is locatedLocation_MethodLocation Collection MethodStringMethod used to collect the coordinates of the wellLocal_Well_NumberLocal Well NumberStringA well identification number used by a local agency that differs from the PA Well IDTopographyTopography TypeStringType of topography the well is located withinSite_TypeType of SiteStringType of site the well is located onBedrock_Depth_FTDepth to Bedrock (Ft)StringDepth to Bedrock as measured in feetBedrock_ReachedBedrock ReachedStringWas bedrock reached during the excavation of the wellData_SourceSource of RecordStringSource of RecordData_ReliabilityData ReliabilityStringInternal assessment of the reliability of the dataWater_UseWater UseStringClassification of how the extracted water is usedWell_UseWell UseStringClassification of the well usageWell_DepthWell DepthStringDepth of the well in feetWell_Yield_GPMWell Yield GPMStringYield of the well (gallon/min)

See web image layer here.The aquifer risk map is being developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding.Methodology for the draft aquifer risk map available for download.This layer shows domestic well density. The domestic well density per square mile is based on well completion report data from the Department of Water Resources Online System for Well Completion Reports, excluding wells drilled prior to 1970.

The aquifer risk map is being developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding. This layer contains summarized water quality risk per census block group, square mile section, and well point. The overall census block group water quality risk is based on five risk factors (1. the count of chemicals with a long-term average (20 year) or recent result (within 2 years) above the MCL, 2. the count of chemicals with a long-term average (20 year) or recent result (within 2 years) within 80% of the MCL, 3. the average magnitude or results above the MCL, 4. the percent area with chemicals above the MCL, and 5. the percent area with chemicals within 80% of the MCL). The specific chemicals that contribute to these risk factors are listed as well. Higher values for each individual risk factor contribute to a higher overall score. The scores are converted to percentiles to normalize the results. Higher percentiles indicate higher water quality risk. The water quality data is based on depth-filtered, de-clustered water quality results from public and domestic supply wells, collected following a similar methodology as the Domestic Well Needs Assessment White Paper. The methodology used to calculate the risk percentiles is outlined in the Aquifer Risk Map Methodology. To provide comments or feedback on this map, please email SAFER@waterboards.ca.gov or Emily.Houlihan@Waterboards.ca.gov.Methodology for the draft aquifer risk map available for download.

Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation's (TDLR) Submitted Driller's Report Database. This database contains water well reports submitted to TDLR from February 2001 to present.

SCDNR groundwater monitoring map with wells, well clusters, and well level data. Used in the online data viewer on the hydrology website.Well locations and cluster site polygons are generalized and approximate and are shown in a grid pattern for visualization. These are not precise well locations.

Los Angeles Public Works has developed a groundwater well web viewer to provide the public with current and historical groundwater depth information throughout Los Angeles County.Purpose:To provide active wells information to the public.Supplemental Information:1. The State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR) developed the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) Program to make groundwater monitoring information available to the public through collaboration between local monitoring parties and DWR to collect groundwater elevation information statewide. The data have been compiled in the CASGEM Online System and made available to the public via the Internet with a GIS map interface. As a result, all interested parties can use the data to evaluate and monitor groundwater conditions in California.The CASGEM Online System will allow you to:• View lists of local agencies, counties and associations who have volunteered to serve as CASGEM Monitoring Entities providing groundwater data statewide• View CASGEM Monitoring Plans and Groundwater Management Plans (via hyperlink)• Search and view groundwater elevation data in tabular format• View hydrographs that show groundwater elevations for wells• Search and view groundwater monitoring well information• View mapped locations of CASGEM wells, monitoring area boundaries, and other geographic information• Measure distances between wells and size of monitoring areas and basins• Download well information, groundwater data, hydrographs and maps• Download summary reports on wells, groundwater elevations, Monitoring Entities and basin information.2. The State of California Department of Conservation developed the Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources Well Finder, which is a web viewer that allows the public to access information on oil, gas, and geothermal wells throughout the State.

Combined database of all wells with uniform attributes from detailed individual well databases (see General and Entity Attribute sections of metadata for individual shape files). All_wells is intended to serve as a metadata-level well database. Large overlaps are known to exist among databases; however, all are preserved as found in order to preserve program-specific information. For example a well may derive geologic data from the Geologic Sampling Points database, public water supply data from the SDWIS Wells database and Water Allocation information from the Water Use (WACOP) database. Each of these will be represented by a record within All_wells.

This map service of 3,000 wells was compiled from EPA's database of Class I and Class II Wells in Kentucky as documented from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.There are 11 Class I hazardous and non-hazardous industrial waste disposal wells in Kentucky. Class I wells are regulated to inject industrial and municipal waste into deep rock formations thousands of feet below the lowest underground sources of drinking water. The Class I hazardous waste disposal wells in Jefferson County are now plugged and abandoned, and the Latonia Refinery disposal well in Kenton County was abandoned when the refinery was dismantled. The only Class I wells in operation are classified non-hazardous waste disposal for the recycling facility in Butler County and for the disposal of limestone mining wastewater in Mason and Pendleton Counties.Class II wells inject fluids associated with oil and natural gas production. There are two types of Class II wells in Kentucky: salt water disposal (SWD) wells, and enhanced-recovery injection (ERI) wells. Disposal wells inject brines (salt water) that are brought to the surface with oil and gas back into the same formation from which they were initially produced or into similar porous underground formations. This practice of brine disposal also ensures the protection of underground sources of drinking water. Enhanced recovery wells inject brine, water, steam, polymers, or carbon dioxide into oil-bearing formations to recover residual oil or natural gas. This is also known as secondary or tertiary recovery.These data were linked to a Kentucky oil-&-gas well location shapefile by spatial join to EPA-supplied locations using a buffered search method. Over 2000 Class II locations were matched to well locations in the KGS O&G well database. If successful match were not made by proximity, then EPA well information and location were provided as is.A downloadable zipped shapefile is located at http://kygs.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=c09338acf1cc4023823510d8e9bf941e

This hosted feature layer has been published in RI State Plane Feet NAD 83. A wellhead protection area (WHPA) is the portion of an aquifer through which groundwater moves to a well. Under the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (DEM) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Program approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 1990, DEM is responsible for delineating a WHPA for each of the public wells in the state. DEM contracted with the United States Geological Survey, Dufresne-Henry Inc., and the United States Environmental Protection Agency to delineate select community stratified drift wells using analytical modeling and hydrogeologic mapping. As of August 2013, the Rhode Island Department of Health Office of Drinking Water Quality (HEALTH) is responsible for delineating the Calculated Fixed Radius WHPA's for bedrock wells, based on the pump rate of the well. Community Well - serves year-round residents; at least 15 service connections or at least 25 individuals. Examples include municipal wells and wells serving nursing homes, condominiums, and mobile home parks. DEM relied on technical input from the Wellhead Protection Program Advisory Committee in developing the delineation methodology. A mapping approach was required that was scientifically defensible, could be applied consistently across the state, and could be applied with the resources available to DEM. The delineations are based on reasonably available information regarding the hydrogeologic environment and the well characteristics. The WHPAs were delineated using the US Geological Survey quadrangle maps at a scale of 1:24000. WHPA maps are available for review at the DEM Office of Water Resources, on the DEM web page at www.dem.ri.gov/maps, and on the Rhode Island Geographic Information System webpage at www.rigis.org.

Data used to model and map pH and redox conditions in groundwater in the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system, eastern USA, are documented in this data release. The models use as input data measurements of pH and dissolved oxygen concentrations at about 3000 to 5000 wells, which were compiled primarily from U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency databases. The boosted regression trees machine learning method was used to build the models. Explanatory variables (predictors) describe geology, hydrology, chemistry, physical characteristics, anthropogenic influence, metrics from a groundwater flow model, and groundwater residence times in the aquifer system. Data for four models are documented--one model for pH and one model each for the probability of dissolved oxygen less than three threshold values (0.5, 1, and 2 milligrams per liter). The data are provided in data tables and raster files, organized as follows. There is one data table for the well data used to develop all four models (well data). There is one zipped group of 10 files (one for each aquifer) for explanatory input data used to make predictions at grid points (prediction input). There are 9 zipped groups of files for model output; these include 1 zip file of predictions at grid points for each of the 4 models (prediction output), 1 zip file for combined pH and dissolved oxygen predictions (combined prediction output); and 4 zip files of uncertainty intervals for predictions for each of the 4 models (uncertainty output). Filenames for prediction input and for model output are distinguished by codes abbreviating the aquifer name and position in the vertical stack of 19 regional aquifers and confining units, as follows: Surficial aquifer, 1surf; Upper Chesapeake aquifer, 3upch; Lower Chesapeake aquifer, 5loch; Piney Point aquifer, 7pipt; Aquia aquifer, 9aqia; Monmouth - Mt. Laurel Aquifer, 11moml; Matawan aquifer, 13mtwn; Magothy Aquifer, 15mgty; Potomac-Patapsco aquifer, 17popt; Potomac-Patuxent aquifer, 19popx. The data release also contains a tif-format raster file of the prediction grid and two data tables that separately describe the explanatory variables (predictors) and their sources.

Water wells in Missouri

See full Data Guide here.Ground Water Classifications Polygon:

Ground Water Quality Classifications is a polygon feature-based layer compiled at 1:24,000 scale that includes water quality classification information for groundwaters for all areas of the State of Connecticut. Ground Waters means waters flowing through earth materials beneath the ground surface and the Ground Water Quality Classifications is a designation of the use of the ground waters. The Ground Water Quality Classifications is based primarily on the Adopted Water Quality Classifications Map sheets with information collected and compiled from 1986 to 1997 by major drainage basin. The maps were hand-drawn at 1:50,000-scale in ink on Mylar which had been underprinted with a USGS topographic map base. The digital layer includes ground water water quality classifications. It does not include water quality classifications for ground waters below surface waterbodies. Surface Water Quality Classifications are defined separately in a set of data layers comprised of line and polygon features. The Ground Water Quality Classifications and the Surface Water Quality Classifications are usually presented together as a depiction of water quality classifications in Connecticut. The Ground Water Quality Classes are GA, GAA, GAAs, GB and GC. Classes GAA and GA designate areas of existing or potential drinking water. All ground waters not otherwise classified are considered as Class GA. Class GAAs is for ground water that is tributary to a public water supply reservoir. Class GB is used where ground water is not suitable for drinking water. Class GC is used for assimilation of permitted discharges. Modified classes GA-Impaired, GAA-Impaired, GAA-Well-Impaired, GAA-Well and GA-NY are found in the data layer to categorize special cases of GA or GAA that may not be meeting the goal (impaired), surround public water supply wells (Well) or contribute to a public water supply watershed for another state (NY). There are three elements that make up the Water Quality Standards which is an important element in Connecticut's clean water program. The first of these is the Standards themselves. The Standards set an overall policy for management of water quality in accordance with the directive of Section 22a-426 of the Connecticut General Statutes. In simple terms the policies can be summarized by saying that the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection shall: Protect surface and ground waters from degradation, Segregate waters used for drinking from those that play a role in waste assimilation, Restore surface waters that have been used for waste assimilation to conditions suitable for fishing and swimming, Restore degraded ground water to protect existing and designated uses, Provide a framework for establishing priorities for pollution abatement and State funding for clean up, Adopt standards that promote the State's economy in harmony with the environment. The second element is the Criteria, the descriptive and numerical standards that describe the allowable parameters and goals for the various water quality classifications. The final element is the Classification Maps that show the Class assigned to each surface and groundwater resource throughout the State. These maps also show the goals for the water resources, and in that manner provide a blueprint and set of priorities for Connecticut's efforts to restore water quality. Although federal law requires adoption of Water Quality Standards for surface waters, Water Quality Standards for ground waters are not subject to federal review and approval. Connecticut's Standards recognize that surface and ground waters are interrelated and address the issue of competing use of ground waters for drinking and for waste water assimilation. These Standards specifically identify ground water quality goals, designated uses and those measures necessary for protection of public and private drinking water supplies; the principal use of Connecticut ground waters. These three elements comprise the Water Quality Standards and are adopted using the public participation procedures contained in Section 22a-426 of the Connecticut General Statutes. The Standards, Criteria and Maps are reviewed and revised roughly every three years. Any change is considered a revision requiring public participation. The public participation process consists of public meetings held at various locations around the State, notification of all chief elected officials, notice in the Connecticut Law Journal and a public hearing. The Classification Maps are the subject of separate public hearings which are held for the adoption of the map covering each major drainage basin in the State. The Water Quality Standards and Criteria documents are available on the DEEP website, www.ct.gov/deep. The Ground and Surface Water Quality Classifications do not represent conditions at any one particular point in time. During the conversion from a manually maintained to a digitally maintained statewide data layer the Housatonic River and Southwest Coastal Basins information was updated. The publication date of the digital data reflects the official adoption date of the most recent Water Quality Classifications. Within the data layer the adoption dates are: Housatonic and Southwest Basins - March 1999, Connecticut and South Central Basins - February 1993, Thames and Southeast Basins - December 1986. This data is updated.

The aquifer risk map is being developed to fulfill requirements of SB-200 and is intended to help prioritize areas where domestic wells and state small water systems may be accessing groundwater that does not meet primary drinking water standards (maximum contaminant level or MCL). In accordance with SB-200, the risk map is to be made available to the public and is to be updated annually starting January 1, 2021. The Fund Expenditure Plan states the risk map will be used by Water Boards staff to help prioritize areas for available SAFER funding.Methodology for the draft aquifer risk map available for download.This layer shows the locations of state small water systems. The state small water system locations were collected by the Rural Community Assistance Corporation. The locations are approximate and may not exactly represent well locations or service boundaries.

This viewer features data related to groundwater resources, wells, standards, and protection. See the following links for more information about OWRB groundwater-related programs:Groundwater Monitoring and Assessment Program (GMAP)Groundwater Monitoring Sites and DataWell Record Search ProgramWater Quality StandardsAdditional information on groundwater wells:USGS Groundwater Data for OklahomaOklahoma Mesonet websiteThe data in this map is available for download at https://www.owrb.ok.gov/data.

Data used to model and map manganese concentrations in groundwater in the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain (NACP) aquifer system, eastern USA, are documented in this data release. The model predicts manganese concentration within four classes and is based on concentration data from 4492 wells. The well data were compiled from U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Suffolk County Water Authority (Suffolk County, New York), and state agency sources. The four concentration classes are based on guidelines for drinking water quality: below detection (class 1, less than 10 micrograms per liter (ug/L)); detected but less than the aesthetic guideline of 50 ug/L (class 2); greater than the aesthetic guideline but less than the health guideline of 300 ug/L (class 3); and greater than the health guideline of 300 ug/L (class 4). The thresholds of 50 ug/L and 300 ug/L are a Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level and a lifetime health advisory, respectively, from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for public water supplies. The model is built with the XGboost machine learning method. Explanatory variables (predictors) include well depth, soil characteristics, hydrologic variables, groundwater residence time, and predicted values of pH and of the probability of low dissolved oxygen from previous machine learning models of the aquifer system. The data are provided in data tables, raster files, and model files, organized as follows. One data table describes the 27 explanatory variables used in the model (NACP_Mn_explanatory_variables.csv). There is a data table for the well data used to develop the models, which includes the manganese concentrations, concentration classes, regional aquifer, explanatory variables, and predicted concentration class for the wells (NACP_Mn_well_data.csv). There is a compressed group (zip file) of 10 files (one for each regional aquifer) for explanatory variable data used to make predictions for the regional aquifers (NACP_Mn_prediction_input_aquifers.zip). There are two zip files providing model output, one for predictions made for each aquifer in text format and one for tif-format rasters of predictions for each aquifer. The data release also contains a tif-format raster file of the prediction grid and a zip file with the model object file (R data format) and a script that can be used to run the model to produce the predictions provided in this data release. Filenames for prediction input and for model output are distinguished by codes abbreviating the aquifer name and position in the vertical stack of 19 regional aquifers and confining units, as follows: Surficial aquifer, 1surf; Upper Chesapeake aquifer, 3upch; Lower Chesapeake aquifer, 5loch; Piney Point aquifer, 7pipt; Aquia aquifer, 9aqia; Monmouth - Mt. Laurel Aquifer, 11moml; Matawan aquifer, 13mtwn; Magothy Aquifer, 15mgty; Potomac-Patapsco aquifer, 17popt; Potomac-Patuxent aquifer, 19popx. The nine confining units are not represented in the model or predictions.

The Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) is the body within the Swiss Geological Survey responsible for hydrogeology. The 1:500,000 Hydrogeological Map forms part of the GeoMaps series (GK500) and is divided into two sheets. The first (GK500-Hydro) represents the various groundwater resources in Switzerland and their productiveness. The second (GK500-Hydro_Vul) shows the vulnerability of the groundwater resources to the risk of pollution. The groundwater resources sheet also indicates the type of groundwater aquifer (karstic, jointed or unconsolidated rock), the most important springs and groundwater catchments as well as hydrodynamic information about the infiltration and exfiltration areas. The two sheets were originally published as Tables 8.6 and 8.7 of the Hydrological Atlas of Switzerland HADES (FOEN, 2004 and 2007).