Facebook
TwitterAs of April 2020, ** percent of retailers anticipated that the COVID-19 pandemic would affect their retail operations for 3 to 12 months. Some ** percent believed the pandemic would affect their retail activity for *** to *** years.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Monthly Supply of New Houses in the United States (MSACSR) from Jan 1963 to Aug 2025 about supplies, new, housing, and USA.
Facebook
TwitterFruit and vegetable vendors in Bogota travel most days to a central market to purchase produce, incurring substantial costs. A social enterprise attempted to shorten the supply chain between farmers and vendors by aggregating orders from many small stores and delivering orders directly. We randomized the introduction of this service at the market-block level. Initial interest was high, and the service reduced travel time and costs, and increased work-life balance. Purchase costs fell 6 to 8 percent, there was incomplete pass-through into lower prices for consumers, and markups rose. However, stores reduced sales of products not offered by this new service, and their total sales and profits appear to have fallen in the short-run, with service usage falling over time. The results offer a window into the nature of competition among small retailers, and point to the challenges in achieving economies of scale when disrupting centralized markets for multi-product firms.
Southwest Bogota
Firm
Sample survey data [ssd]
All neighborhoods in Bogota are classified by the government into one of six socio-economic strata, classified from 1 (poorest) to 6 (richest). Our focus is on poor neighborhoods (strata 1 to 3) in the South-West of Bogota, not immediately adjacent to Corabastos. Agruppa went door-to-door along streets in these neighborhoods in January and February 2016 (see Appendix 2 for a study timeline) to identify stores that sell fruit and vegetables, excluding the few large supermarkets and chain stores. Their aim was to map approximately 2,400 stores. Using larger streets as natural boundaries, these neighborhoods were then divided into 69 blocks, with a median block size of 36 retail shops per block. Six of these blocks were then dropped for safety reasons, leaving 63 blocks. Blocks were formed into matched pairs on the basis of geographic location and number of firms in the block, and then ordered according to the sequence in which Agruppa desired to expand operations. One block within each pair was then randomly assigned to treatment, and the other to control, for a total of 32 treatment blocks and 31 control blocks.
This yielded a sample of 1,620 firms, comprising 852 firms in treatment blocks and 768 firms in control blocks. On average, 69 percent of firms in treatment blocks and 70 percent of firms in control blocks expressed interest in Agruppa, giving us samples of 586 interested firms in treatment blocks, 266 uninterested firms in treatment blocks, 536 interested firms in control blocks, and 232 uninterested firms in control blocks.
Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]
The Baseline and Follow-Up survey quetionnaires are published in Spanish and English, and provided under the Documentation tab.
IPA Colombia conducted five rounds of high-frequency short-term follow-up surveys at 2, 4, 6, 10, and 14 weeks after the launch of Agruppa in a block. We would survey a treatment block and its corresponding control block in the same week, staggering the timing to match the staggered timing of the baseline surveys and introduction of Agruppa. The response rate averaged 79% for firms interested in Agruppa (81% in treatment blocks, 77% in control blocks), and 69% for not-interested firms (70% in treatment blocks, 68% in control blocks).
We then collected two longer surveys at six-months and twelve months after the launch of Agruppa in a block. In addition to the information collected in the high-frequency surveys, these questionnaires also asked about business opening hours, sales of some other products, pricing strategies, crime, record-keeping, and work-life balance. The response rates for interested firms were 78% at six months (80% in treatment blocks, 75% in control blocks), and 76% at twelve months (77% in treatment blocks, and 74% in control blocks), and were again lower for uninterested firms
Facebook
TwitterThe latest release on the supply of homes delivered by the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) in England, excluding London except for delivery of programmes managed by the HCA on behalf of the Greater London Authority, were released on Thursday 3 December 2015.
The key points were:
There were 10,592 housing starts on site and 9,471 housing completions delivered through programmes managed by the HCA in England (excluding London for all programmes except those administered by the HCA on behalf of the Greater London Authority) between 1 April and 30 September 2015. The HCA manages the Help to Buy (Equity Loan) scheme in England but the completions are reported by the Department for Communities and Local Government available from the webpage below and are, therefore, excluded from this publication.
The majority (7,572 or 71 per cent) of the housing starts on site in the six months to 30 September 2015 were for affordable homes. This represents a decrease of 20 per cent on the 9,439 affordable homes reported between 1 April and 30 September 2014.
5,965 affordable homes started in the six months to 30 September 2015 were for Affordable Rent, a decrease of 20 per cent on the same period of 2014-15. A further 1,333 were for Intermediate Affordable Housing schemes, including shared ownership. This is an increase of 6 per cent on the same period of 2014-15. The remaining 274 were for Social Rent, a decrease of 61 per cent on the same period of 2014-15. Of the affordable homes started in the six month period ending 30 September 2015, the Affordable Homes Programme (AHP) 2015-18 accounted for 91 per cent and the Single Land Programme for 5 per cent.
6,447 or 68 per cent of housing completions in the first six months of 2015-16 were for affordable homes. This represents a decrease of 39 per cent on the 10,483 affordable homes completed in the first six months of 2014-15.
4,733 affordable homes completed in the six month period 1 April to 30 September 2015 were for Affordable Rent, a decrease of 36 per cent compared to the same period of 2014-15. A further 1,031 were for Intermediate Affordable Housing schemes, including shared ownership, a decrease of 52 per cent on the same period of 2014-15, and the remaining 683 were for Social Rent, a decrease of 23 per cent on the same period of 2014-15.
The Department for Communities and Local Government has combined the affordable housing statistics in this release with the Greater London Authority’s affordable housing statistics to produce affordable housing starts and completions for England.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides detailed information on various grocery items, including product details, supplier information, stock levels, reorder data, pricing, and sales performance. The data covers 990 products across various categories such as Grains & Pulses, Beverages, Fruits & Vegetables, and more. The dataset is useful for inventory management, sales analysis, and supply chain optimization.
This dataset can be used for various tasks such as: - Predicting reorder quantities using machine learning. - Analyzing inventory turnover to optimize stock levels. - Conducting sales trend analysis to identify popular or slow-moving items. - Improving supply chain efficiency by analyzing supplier performance.
This dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You are free to share, adapt, and use the data, provided proper attribution is given.
Facebook
TwitterBusiness or organization change in supply chain challenges over the last three months, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), business employment size, type of business, business activity and majority ownership, second quarter of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Wholesalers registered to trade alcohol in the Northern Territory provide the Department of Industry, Tourism and Trade with data on the volume of alcohol supplied to licensed retailers by product type (cask wine, bottled wine, fortified wine, cider, standard spirits, pre mixed spirits, full strength beer, mid strength beer and low strength beer). The reference period and the actual date of release can have can have a substantial lag. Data is collated and analysed in a chronological fashion. Always produced 3 months in arrears. Due to resourcing and competing priorities there is often a backlog of data to be processed.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Producer Price Index by Industry: Building Material and Supplies Dealers (PCU44414441) from Dec 2003 to Sep 2025 about dealers, materials, supplies, buildings, PPI, industry, inflation, price index, indexes, price, and USA.
Facebook
TwitterSupply chain analytics is a valuable part of data-driven decision-making in various industries such as manufacturing, retail, healthcare, and logistics. It is the process of collecting, analyzing and interpreting data related to the movement of products and services from suppliers to customers.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Digital Skills Indicator 2.0 (DSI) is a composite indicator which is based on selected activities related to internet or software use that individuals aged 16-74 perform in five specific areas (Information and data literacy, Communication and collaboration, Digital content creation, Safety, and Problem solving). It is assumed that individuals having performed certain activities have the corresponding skills. Therefore, the indicators can be considered as proxy of individuals’ digital skills.
According to the variety of activities performed, two levels of skills are computed for each of the five areas ("basic" and "above basic"). Finally, based on the component indicators for each area, an overall digital skills indicator is calculated as a proxy of the digital skills of individuals ("no skills", "limited", "narrow", "low", "basic", "above basic" or "at least basic skills").
1. Information and data literacy skills
Definition in Digital Competence Framework 2.0: To articulate information needs, to locate and retrieve digital data, information and content. To judge the relevance of the source and its content. To store, manage, organize digital data, information and content.
Activities used for calculating the information and data literacy skills:
Levels of information skills:
2. Communication and collaboration skills
Definition in Digital Competence Framework 2.0: To interact, communicate and collaborate through digital technologies while being aware of cultural and generational diversity. To participate in society through public and private digital services and participatory citizenship. To manage one’s digital identity and reputation.
Activities used for calculating the communication and collaboration skills:
Levels of communication and collaboration skills:
3. Digital content creation skills
Definition in Digital Competence Framework 2.0: To create and edit digital content. To improve and integrate information and content into an existing body of knowledge while understanding how copyright and licences are to be applied. To know how to give understandable instructions for a computer system.
Activities used for calculating the digital content creation skills:
Levels of digital content creation skills:
4. Safety skills
Definition in Digital Competence Framework 2.0: To protect devices, content, personal data and privacy in digital environments. To protect physical and psychological health, and to be aware of digital technologies for social well-being and social inclusion. To be aware of the environmental impact of digital technologies and their use.
Activities used for calculating the safety:
Levels of digital content creation skills:
5. Problem solving skills
Definition in Digital Competence Framework 2.0: To identify needs and problems, and to resolve conceptual problems and problem situations in digital environments. To use digital tools to innovate processes and products. To keep up-to-date with the digital evolution.
Activities used for calculating the problem solving skills:
Levels of problem solving skills:
OVERALL DIGITAL SKILL INDICATOR
“above basic” in all 5 areas.
if all 5 areas are at least basic level (some can be “basic” and some can be “above basic”, but not all 5 areas are “above basic”).
if individuals fall either into “above basic” or “basic” category of skills (I_DSK2_BAB).
if individuals have “basic” or “above basic” level in 4 areas and “no skills” in 1 area (4 out of 5).
if individuals have “basic” or “above basic” level in 3 areas and “no skills” in 2 areas (3 out of 5).
if individuals have “basic” or “above basic” level in 2 areas and “no skills” in 3 areas (2 out of 5).
if individuals have “no skills” in 4 areas or “no skills” in all 5 areas despite declaring having used the internet at least once during last 3 months.
individuals that have not used the internet in the last 3 months.
(For formula and references to original variables collected by the survey on the use of ICT in households and by individuals, please see in the Annex, 'A worked example of how the DSI is computed').
As of 2021, the dataset encompasses an additional indicator (not included in DESI):
Online Information and Communication Skills
The dataset encompasses individuals who performed some activities from both INFORMATION AND DATA LITERACY and COMMUNICATION AND COLLABORATION areas (at “basic” or “above basic” level)
Individuals with online information and communication skills (I_DSK2_IC_S):
1. At least one variable from the following list:
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Business Goal
Date: 2023/09/15
Dataset: Sales quantity of a certain brand from January to December 2022 and from January to September 2023.
Please describe what you observe (no specific presentation format required). Among your observations, identify at least three valuable insights and explain why you consider them valuable.
If more resources were available to you (including time, information, etc.), what would you need, and what more could you achieve?
Metadata of the file Data Period: January 2022 - September 2023 Data Fields: - item - store_id - sales of each month
Metadata of the file Data Period: January 2022 - September 2023 Data Fields: - item - store_id - sales of each month
Sample question & answer 1. Product insights: identify the product sales analysis, such as BCG matrix 2. Store insights: identify the sales performance of the sales 3. Supply chain insights: identify the demand 4. Time series forecasting: identify tread, seasonality
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This dataset provides synthetic yet realistic data for analyzing and forecasting retail store inventory demand. It contains over 73000 rows of daily data across multiple stores and products, including attributes like sales, inventory levels, pricing, weather, promotions, and holidays.
The dataset is ideal for practicing machine learning tasks such as demand forecasting, dynamic pricing, and inventory optimization. It allows data scientists to explore time series forecasting techniques, study the impact of external factors like weather and holidays on sales, and build advanced models to optimize supply chain performance.
Challenge 1: Time Series Demand Forecasting Predict daily product demand across stores using historical sales and inventory data. Can you build an LSTM-based forecasting model that outperforms classical methods like ARIMA?
Challenge 2: Inventory Optimization Optimize inventory levels by analyzing sales trends and minimizing stockouts while reducing overstock situations.
Challenge 3: Dynamic Pricing Develop a pricing strategy based on demand, competitor pricing, and discounts to maximize revenue.
Date: Daily records from [start_date] to [end_date]. Store ID & Product ID: Unique identifiers for stores and products. Category: Product categories like Electronics, Clothing, Groceries, etc. Region: Geographic region of the store. Inventory Level: Stock available at the beginning of the day. Units Sold: Units sold during the day. Demand Forecast: Predicted demand based on past trends. Weather Condition: Daily weather impacting sales. Holiday/Promotion: Indicators for holidays or promotions.
Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA): Analyze sales trends, visualize data, and identify patterns. Time Series Forecasting: Train models like ARIMA, Prophet, or LSTM to predict future demand. Pricing Analysis: Study how discounts and competitor pricing affect sales.
Facebook
TwitterDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of house sales in the UK spiked, followed by a period of decline. In 2023 and 2024, the housing market slowed notably, and in January 2025, transaction volumes fell to 46,774. House sales volumes are impacted by a number of factors, including mortgage rates, house prices, supply, demand, as well as the overall health of the market. The economic uncertainty and rising unemployment rates has also affected the homebuyer sentiment of Brits. How have UK house prices developed over the past 10 years? House prices in the UK have increased year-on-year since 2015, except for a brief period of decline in the second half of 2023 and the beginning of 2024. That is based on the 12-month percentage change of the UK house price index. At the peak of the housing boom in 2022, prices soared by nearly 14 percent. The decline that followed was mild, at under three percent. The cooling in the market was more pronounced in England and Wales, where the average house price declined in 2023. Conversely, growth in Scotland and Northern Ireland continued. What is the impact of mortgage rates on house sales? For a long period, mortgage rates were at record-low, allowing prospective homebuyers to take out a 10-year loan at a mortgage rate of less than three percent. In the last quarter of 2021, this period came to an end as the Bank of England rose the bank lending rate to contain the spike in inflation. Naturally, the higher borrowing costs affected consumer sentiment, urging many homebuyers to place their plans on hold and leading to a decline in sales.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.ycharts.com/termshttps://www.ycharts.com/terms
View daily updates and historical trends for Bitcoin Supply. Source: Blockchain.com. Track economic data with YCharts analytics.
Facebook
TwitterHow high is the brand awareness of Gardener's Supply Company in the United States?When it comes to DIY and garden online shop users, brand awareness of Gardener's Supply Company is at **% in the United States. The survey was conducted using the concept of aided brand recognition, showing respondents both the brand's logo and the written brand name.How popular is Gardener's Supply Company in the United States?In total, *% of U.S. DIY and garden online shop users say they like Gardener's Supply Company. However, in actuality, among the **% of U.S. respondents who know Gardener's Supply Company, **% of people like the brand.What is the usage share of Gardener's Supply Company in the United States?All in all, *% of DIY and garden online shop users in the United States use Gardener's Supply Company. That means, of the **% who know the brand, **% use them.How loyal are the customers of Gardener's Supply Company?Around *% of DIY and garden online shop users in the United States say they are likely to use Gardener's Supply Company again. Set in relation to the *% usage share of the brand, this means that **% of their customers show loyalty to the brand.What's the buzz around Gardener's Supply Company in the United States?In July 2022, about *% of U.S. DIY and garden online shop users had heard about Gardener's Supply Company in the media, on social media, or in advertising over the past three months. Of the **% who know the brand, that's **%, meaning at the time of the survey there's little buzz around Gardener's Supply Company in the United States.If you want to compare brands, do deep-dives by survey items of your choice, filter by total online population or users of a certain brand, or drill down on your very own hand-tailored target groups, our Consumer Insights Brand KPI survey has you covered.
Facebook
TwitterHow high is the brand awareness of Chewy in the United States?When it comes to pet supply online shop users, brand awareness of Chewy is at ** percent in the United States. The survey was conducted using the concept of aided brand recognition, showing respondents both the brand's logo and the written brand name.How popular is Chewy in the United States?In total, ** percent of U.S. pet supply online shop users say they like Chewy. However, in actuality, among the ** percent of U.S. respondents who know Chewy, ** percent of people like the brand.What is the usage share of Chewy in the United States?All in all, ** percent of pet supply online shop users in the United States use Chewy. That means, of the ** percent who know the brand, ** percent use them.How loyal are the customers of Chewy?Around ** percent of pet supply online shop users in the United States say they are likely to use Chewy again. Set in relation to the ** percent usage share of the brand, this means that ** percent of their customers show loyalty to the brand.What's the buzz around Chewy in the United States?In March 2024, about ** percent of U.S. pet supply online shop users had heard about Chewy in the media, on social media, or in advertising over the past three months. Of the ** percent who know the brand, that's ** percent, meaning at the time of the survey there's considerable buzz around Chewy in the United States.If you want to compare brands, do deep-dives by survey items of your choice, filter by total online population or users of a certain brand, or drill down on your very own hand-tailored target groups, our Consumer Insights Brand KPI survey has you covered.
Facebook
TwitterHow high is the brand awareness of Just for Pets in the UK?When it comes to pet supply online shop users, brand awareness of Just for Pets is at *** in the UK. The survey was conducted using the concept of aided brand recognition, showing respondents both the brand's logo and the written brand name.How popular is Just for Pets in the UK?In total, *** of UK pet supply online shop users say they like Just for Pets. However, in actuality, among the *** of UK respondents who know Just for Pets, *** of people like the brand.What is the usage share of Just for Pets in the UK?All in all, *** of pet supply online shop users in the UK use Just for Pets. That means, of the *** who know the brand, *** use them.How loyal are the customers of Just for Pets?Around ** of pet supply online shop users in the UK say they are likely to use Just for Pets again. Set in relation to the *** usage share of the brand, this means that *** of their customers show loyalty to the brand.What's the buzz around Just for Pets in the UK?In July 2022, about ** of UK pet supply online shop users had heard about Just for Pets in the media, on social media, or in advertising over the past three months. Of the *** who know the brand, that's ***, meaning at the time of the survey there's little buzz around Just for Pets in the UK.If you want to compare brands, do deep-dives by survey items of your choice, filter by total online population or users of a certain brand, or drill down on your very own hand-tailored target groups, our Consumer Insights Brand KPI survey has you covered.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterAs of April 2020, ** percent of retailers anticipated that the COVID-19 pandemic would affect their retail operations for 3 to 12 months. Some ** percent believed the pandemic would affect their retail activity for *** to *** years.