Quarterly Journal of Economics Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The Quarterly Journal of Economics is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Oxford University Press for the Harvard University Department of Economics. Its current editors-in-chief are Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer, and Stefanie Stantcheva (Harvard University). It is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language and covers all aspects of the field—from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2015 impact factor of 6.662, ranking it first out of 347 journals in the category "Economics". It is generally regarded as one of the top 5 journals in economics, together with the American Economic Review, Econometrica, the Journal of Political Economy, and the Review of Economic Studies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Scope of the Journal The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field-from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory, to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Impact Factor and Ranking Year Impact Factor Ssi: Economics 2020 15.563 1 out of 377 2019 11.375 1 out of 371 2018 11.775 1 out of 363 2017 7.863 1 out of 353 2016 6.662 1 out of 347 2015 5.538 2 out of 344 2014 6.654 1 out of 333 2013 5.966 3 out of 332 2012 5.278 2 out of 332 2011 5.920 2 out of 320 2010 5.940 2 out of 304 2009 5.647 2 out of 245 This information is taken from the Journal Citation Reports™ (Clarivate, 2021). Abstracting & Indexing Services The Quarterly Journal of Economics is covered by the following abstracting and indexing services: ABI-INFORM Book Review Digest Plus CAB Abstracts Coal Abstracts Criminal Justice Abstracts Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Index to Statistics Dietrich's Index Philosophicus Documentation in Public Administration EconLit Emerald Management Reviews Environmental RouteNet Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database Expanded Academic ASAP Family Index Historical Abstracts Human Resources Abstracts IBZ: International Bibliography of Periodical Literature Index of Economic Articles in Journals & Collected Volumes Index to Periodical Articles Related to Law International Bibliography of Humanities & Sociological Literature Leisure, Recreation, and Tourism Abstracts Leisure Tourism Database LexisNexis Operations Research - Management Science Peace Research Abstracts ProQuest Central Public Administration Abstracts Quality Control & Applied Statistics RePec Risk Abstracts SCOPUS Social Science Source Social Sciences Citation Index/Social SciSearch Social Sciences Index Social Work Abstracts Wilson Business Abstracts World Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology Abstracts Zentralblatt MATH

Quarterly Journal of Economics - ResearchHelpDesk - The Quarterly Journal of Economics is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by the Oxford University Press for the Harvard University Department of Economics. Its current editors-in-chief are Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer, and Stefanie Stantcheva (Harvard University). It is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language and covers all aspects of the field—from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2015 impact factor of 6.662, ranking it first out of 347 journals in the category "Economics". It is generally regarded as one of the top 5 journals in economics, together with the American Economic Review, Econometrica, the Journal of Political Economy, and the Review of Economic Studies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Scope of the Journal The Quarterly Journal of Economics is the oldest professional journal of economics in the English language. Edited at Harvard University's Department of Economics, it covers all aspects of the field-from the journal's traditional emphasis on micro theory, to both empirical and theoretical macroeconomics. QJE is invaluable to professional and academic economists and students around the world. Impact Factor and Ranking Year Impact Factor Ssi: Economics 2020 15.563 1 out of 377 2019 11.375 1 out of 371 2018 11.775 1 out of 363 2017 7.863 1 out of 353 2016 6.662 1 out of 347 2015 5.538 2 out of 344 2014 6.654 1 out of 333 2013 5.966 3 out of 332 2012 5.278 2 out of 332 2011 5.920 2 out of 320 2010 5.940 2 out of 304 2009 5.647 2 out of 245 This information is taken from the Journal Citation Reports™ (Clarivate, 2021). Abstracting & Indexing Services The Quarterly Journal of Economics is covered by the following abstracting and indexing services: ABI-INFORM Book Review Digest Plus CAB Abstracts Coal Abstracts Criminal Justice Abstracts Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences Current Index to Statistics Dietrich's Index Philosophicus Documentation in Public Administration EconLit Emerald Management Reviews Environmental RouteNet Environmental Sciences & Pollution Management Database Expanded Academic ASAP Family Index Historical Abstracts Human Resources Abstracts IBZ: International Bibliography of Periodical Literature Index of Economic Articles in Journals & Collected Volumes Index to Periodical Articles Related to Law International Bibliography of Humanities & Sociological Literature Leisure, Recreation, and Tourism Abstracts Leisure Tourism Database LexisNexis Operations Research - Management Science Peace Research Abstracts ProQuest Central Public Administration Abstracts Quality Control & Applied Statistics RePec Risk Abstracts SCOPUS Social Science Source Social Sciences Citation Index/Social SciSearch Social Sciences Index Social Work Abstracts Wilson Business Abstracts World Agricultural Economics & Rural Sociology Abstracts Zentralblatt MATH

To create the dataset, the top 10 countries leading in the incidence of COVID-19 in the world were selected as of October 22, 2020 (on the eve of the second full of pandemics), which are presented in the Global 500 ranking for 2020: USA, India, Brazil, Russia, Spain, France and Mexico. For each of these countries, no more than 10 of the largest transnational corporations included in the Global 500 rating for 2020 and 2019 were selected separately. The arithmetic averages were calculated and the change (increase) in indicators such as profitability and profitability of enterprises, their ranking position (competitiveness), asset value and number of employees. The arithmetic mean values of these indicators for all countries of the sample were found, characterizing the situation in international entrepreneurship as a whole in the context of the COVID-19 crisis in 2020 on the eve of the second wave of the pandemic. The data is collected in a general Microsoft Excel table. Dataset is a unique database that combines COVID-19 statistics and entrepreneurship statistics. The dataset is flexible data that can be supplemented with data from other countries and newer statistics on the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the fact that the data in the dataset are not ready-made numbers, but formulas, when adding and / or changing the values in the original table at the beginning of the dataset, most of the subsequent tables will be automatically recalculated and the graphs will be updated. This allows the dataset to be used not just as an array of data, but as an analytical tool for automating scientific research on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship. The dataset includes not only tabular data, but also charts that provide data visualization. The dataset contains not only actual, but also forecast data on morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 for the period of the second wave of the pandemic in 2020. The forecasts are presented in the form of a normal distribution of predicted values and the probability of their occurrence in practice. This allows for a broad scenario analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship, substituting various predicted morbidity and mortality rates in risk assessment tables and obtaining automatically calculated consequences (changes) on the characteristics of international entrepreneurship. It is also possible to substitute the actual values identified in the process and following the results of the second wave of the pandemic to check the reliability of pre-made forecasts and conduct a plan-fact analysis. The dataset contains not only the numerical values of the initial and predicted values of the set of studied indicators, but also their qualitative interpretation, reflecting the presence and level of risks of a pandemic and COVID-19 crisis for international entrepreneurship.

This dataset includes the data on educational, scientific and research, international, financial and economic performance and public recognition of 93 Russian leading universities in the period 2015-2018. Leading universities refers to federal, national research and flagship universities, together with universities-participants of the Russian Academic Excellence Project (Project 5-100). These data were gathered from materials, published in the monitoring of higher education institutions performance, held by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Web of Science (citation-based research analytics tool InCites) and Scopus (citation-based research analytics tool SciVal) databases, materials from international ranking agencies QS, THE, ARWU and presented in Excel format. Researchers can use this dataset for socio-economic studies in comparative analysis of higher education system development level in different countries.

Rankings and geographic distributions: WEF-GCI versus CSI.

The World Happiness Report is a landmark survey of the state of global happiness. The first report was published in 2012, the second in 2013, the third in 2015, and the fourth in the 2016 Update. The World Happiness 2017, which ranks 155 countries by their happiness levels, was released at the United Nations at an event celebrating International Day of Happiness on March 20th. The report continues to gain global recognition as governments, organizations and civil society increasingly use happiness indicators to inform their policy-making decisions. Leading experts across fields – economics, psychology, survey analysis, national statistics, health, public policy and more – describe how measurements of well-being can be used effectively to assess the progress of nations. The reports review the state of happiness in the world today and show how the new science of happiness explains personal and national variations in happiness.

The happiness scores and rankings use data from the Gallup World Poll. The scores are based on answers to the main life evaluation question asked in the poll. This question, known as the Cantril ladder, asks respondents to think of a ladder with the best possible life for them being a 10 and the worst possible life being a 0 and to rate their own current lives on that scale. The scores are from nationally representative samples for the years 2013-2016 and use the Gallup weights to make the estimates representative. The columns following the happiness score estimate the extent to which each of six factors – economic production, social support, life expectancy, freedom, absence of corruption, and generosity – contribute to making life evaluations higher in each country than they are in Dystopia, a hypothetical country that has values equal to the world’s lowest national averages for each of the six factors. They have no impact on the total score reported for each country, but they do explain why some countries rank higher than others.

Selected hazard-specific examples of foodborne disease, estimated costs of disease, and modelled changes in disease patterns due to extreme weather events, integrating the health, economic and climate (planetary boundary) imperatives, where data were available.

Ports are critical centers of international trade and global logistics now that economic globalization has taken hold. The efficiency performance of port logistics is crucial to building an emerging pattern of development in which domestic and foreign dual cycles are complementary for China. This paper examines the efficiency performance of 19 ports within five major economic circles in China. It explores how their efficiency is distributed, and the configurations of efficiency improvement during the new normal of China’s economy. First, the DEA-BCC model is employed to calculate the technical efficiency performance and distribution of each port from 2011 to 2020. Then, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was applied to integrate and analyze the influencing factors. The results show as follows: (1) Each port group performed differently on efficiency rankings, as well as regional distributions. Among these, the port groups of the Bohai Rim region, the Yangtze River Delta region, and the Bohai Rim region continue to rank highly. (2) From the perspective of configuration analysis, the results suggest that government support is not necessary for port logistics with better economic endowments. However, it is critical for backward ones. (3) A rational industrial structure can enhance levels of infrastructure, openness, and information technology, improving port performance. The findings can provide theoretical and practical references for better promoting the development of Chinese port management.al references for better promoting the development of Chinese port management.

While China’s digital trade is developing rapidly, it is facing the problem of uncoordinated and uneven regional development. In order to explore countermeasures to bridge the differences in regional digital trade, this paper first measures the development level of digital trade in 11 provinces of the Yangtze River Economic Belt through entropy-weighting TOPSIS. Secondly, the fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis method was used to analyze the influencing factors and improvement paths of digital trade development in various provinces of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. The research results show that: first, the current development level of digital trade is gradually weakening from east to west, especially the development of digital trade in the Yangtze River Delta region is the best, showing a large regional imbalance and uncoordinated development. What’s more, the market size and urbanization have the most significant impact on the development of digital trade. Finally, we examine the reliability of the results by sensitivity analysis, and find that our ranking results are robust. In the future, China should continue to actively promote the coordinated development strategy of regional economy and participate in international digital trade exchanges and cooperation, so as to promote the coordinated and high-quality development of digital trade.

Ports are critical centers of international trade and global logistics now that economic globalization has taken hold. The efficiency performance of port logistics is crucial to building an emerging pattern of development in which domestic and foreign dual cycles are complementary for China. This paper examines the efficiency performance of 19 ports within five major economic circles in China. It explores how their efficiency is distributed, and the configurations of efficiency improvement during the new normal of China’s economy. First, the DEA-BCC model is employed to calculate the technical efficiency performance and distribution of each port from 2011 to 2020. Then, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was applied to integrate and analyze the influencing factors. The results show as follows: (1) Each port group performed differently on efficiency rankings, as well as regional distributions. Among these, the port groups of the Bohai Rim region, the Yangtze River Delta region, and the Bohai Rim region continue to rank highly. (2) From the perspective of configuration analysis, the results suggest that government support is not necessary for port logistics with better economic endowments. However, it is critical for backward ones. (3) A rational industrial structure can enhance levels of infrastructure, openness, and information technology, improving port performance. The findings can provide theoretical and practical references for better promoting the development of Chinese port management.al references for better promoting the development of Chinese port management.

Ranking of global systemically important markets.