Context

This Dataset is an updated version of the Amazon review dataset released in 2014. As in the previous version, this dataset includes reviews (ratings, text, helpfulness votes), product metadata (descriptions, category information, price, brand, and image features), and links (also viewed/also bought graphs). In addition, this version provides the following features:

• More reviews:

  • The total number of reviews is 233.1 million (142.8 million in 2014).

• New reviews:

  • Current data includes reviews in the range May 1996 - Oct 2018.

• Metadata: - We have added transaction metadata for each review shown on the review page.

  • Added more detailed metadata of the product landing page.

Acknowledgements

If you publish articles based on this dataset, please cite the following paper:

• Jianmo Ni, Jiacheng Li, Julian McAuley. Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fined-grained aspects. EMNLP, 2019.

In 2021, Google's share of online reviews increased to 71 percent, up from 67 percent in 2020, indicating a rise in willingness from consumers to share their experiences and opinions online. Overall, Google is the platform and search engine on which most consumers leave reviews for local businesses.

The previous review in this series introduced the notion of data description and outlined some of the more common summary measures used to describe a dataset. However, a dataset is typically only of interest for the information it provides regarding the population from which it was drawn. The present review focuses on estimation of population values from a sample.

A November 2021 survey of online users in the United States found that 81 percent of respondents had used Google as a tool to evaluate local businesses in the past 12 months. Yelp was ranked second with over half of respondents using the review platform for such purpose.

In 2021, many online shoppers in the United Kingdom (UK) considered what previous buyers had to say about products before purchasing the items themselves. Approximately **** in *** UK consumers stated they would check online reviews before buying from a particular business. Even more shoppers said they often avoid enterprises with a rating lower than four.

In 2022, almost *** in *** consumers in the United States reported always reading ratings and reviews when they shopped online for clothing. In contrast, only ***** percent of survey respondents reported doing so on an occasional basis, indicating that ratings and reviews are an important purchase criterion for online apparel shoppers.

Access our Trustpilot Reviews Data in CSV Format, offering a comprehensive collection of customer reviews from Trustpilot.

This dataset includes detailed reviews, ratings, and feedback across various industries and businesses. Available in a convenient CSV format, it is ideal for market research, sentiment analysis, and competitive benchmarking.

Leverage this data to gain insights into customer satisfaction, identify trends, and enhance your business strategies. Whether you're analyzing consumer sentiment or conducting competitive analysis, this dataset provides valuable information to support your needs.

This csv file contains a descriptive dataset of 617 scholarly journals that make use of a form of Open Peer Review (OPR) based on Open Reports and/or Open Reviewer Identities. The data file contains the following fields:

Journal Title

Year of First Identified OPR Occurrence (2001-2019)

High Level Discipline of the Journal (Humanities, Medical and Health Sciences, Multidisciplinary, Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, Technology)

Journal URL

Journal Publisher

Publisher Country

Use of Open Reports (Decided by Author, Decided by Editor, Mandated by Journal, None)

Use of Open Reviewer Identities (Decided by Reviewer, Mandated, None)

Notes that provide additional information about the journal

Teaching Statistical Concepts Using Computing Tools: A Review of the Literature

Amazon Customer Reviews (a.k.a. Product Reviews) is one of Amazons iconic products. In a period of over two decades since the first review in 1995, millions of Amazon customers have contributed over a hundred million reviews to express opinions and describe their experiences regarding products on the Amazon.com website. This makes Amazon Customer Reviews a rich source of information for academic researchers in the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP), Information Retrieval (IR), and Machine Learning (ML), amongst others. Accordingly, we are releasing this data to further research in multiple disciplines related to understanding customer product experiences. Specifically, this dataset was constructed to represent a sample of customer evaluations and opinions, variation in the perception of a product across geographical regions, and promotional intent or bias in reviews.

Over 130+ million customer reviews are available to researchers as part of this release. The data is available in TSV files in the amazon-reviews-pds S3 bucket in AWS US East Region. Each line in the data files corresponds to an individual review (tab delimited, with no quote and escape characters).

Each Dataset contains the following columns:

• marketplace: 2 letter country code of the marketplace where the review was written.
• customer_id: Random identifier that can be used to aggregate reviews written by a single author.
• review_id: The unique ID of the review.
• product_id: The unique Product ID the review pertains to. In the multilingual dataset the reviews for the same product in different countries can be grouped by the same product_id.
• product_parent: Random identifier that can be used to aggregate reviews for the same product.
• product_title: Title of the product.
• product_category: Broad product category that can be used to group reviews (also used to group the dataset into coherent parts).
• star_rating: The 1-5 star rating of the review.
• helpful_votes: Number of helpful votes.
• total_votes: Number of total votes the review received.
• vine: Review was written as part of the Vine program.
• verified_purchase: The review is on a verified purchase.
• review_headline: The title of the review.
• review_body: The review text.
• review_date: The date the review was written.

Yearly data of Quality Review ratings from 2005 to 2017

Abstract: With the e-commerce growth, more people are buying products over the internet. To increase customer satisfaction, merchants provide spaces for product and service reviews. Products with positive reviews attract customers, while products with negative reviews lose customers. Following this idea, some individuals and corporations write fake reviews to promote their products and services or defame their competitors. The difficulty for finding these reviews was in the large amount of information available. One solution is to use data mining techniques and tools, such as the classification function. Exploring this situation, the present work evaluates classification techniques to identify fake reviews about products and services on the Internet. The research also presents a literature systematic review on fake reviews. The research used 8 classification algorithms. The algorithms were trained and tested with a hotels database. The CONCENSO algorithm presented the best result, with 88% in the precision indicator. After the first test, the algorithms classified reviews on another hotels database. To compare the results of this new classification, the Review Skeptic algorithm was used. The SVM and GLMNET algorithms presented the highest convergence with the Review Skeptic algorithm, classifying 83% of reviews with the same result. The research contributes by demonstrating the algorithms ability to understand consumers’ real reviews to products and services on the Internet. Another contribution is to be the pioneer in the investigation of fake reviews in Brazil and in production engineering.

The State Review Framework is a primary means by which EPA conducts oversight of three core federal statutes: Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The routine, nationwide review provides a consistent process for evaluating the performance of state, local and EPA compliance and enforcement programs. The overarching goal of the reviews is to ensure fair and consistent enforcement necessary to protect human health and the environment.

You can analyze the Yelp's data the OpenWeb Ninja API provides to gain insights into the business world. This includes looking at market trends, identifying popular business categories, reading customer reviews and ratings, and understanding the factors that contribute to business success or failure.

The dataset includes all key business listings data & consumer review data:

Business Type, Description, Categories, Location, Consumer Review Data, Review Rating, Review Reactions, Review Author Information, Licenses, Highlights, and more!

This statistic shows the share of adults who read reviews before watching a movie in the United States as of August 2018, broken down by age group. The findings show that ** percent of respondents aged between 45 and 54 years old said they always read movie reviews before seeing a movie, the largest share amongst all age groups surveyed by the source. Interestingly, the share of respondents who said that they sometimes read a film review before viewing the film is the same for 18 to 24 year olds and those ages 55 or above.

In 2019, ** percent of UK holidaymakers used online review sites for destination information and accommodation reviews. However fewer respondents (** percent) said that they trusted online reviews to give an accurate reflection.

Survey of innovation and business strategy, frequency of review of key production performance indicators by top or middle managers, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and enterprise size for Canada and regions from 2009 to today.

Utilize our Amazon reviews dataset for diverse applications to enrich business strategies and market insights. Analyzing this dataset can aid in understanding customer behavior, product performance, and market trends, empowering organizations to refine their product and marketing strategies. Access the entire dataset or tailor a subset to fit your requirements. Popular use cases include: Product Performance Analysis: Analyze Amazon reviews to assess product performance, uncovering customer satisfaction levels, common issues, and highly praised features to inform product improvements and marketing messages. Customer Behavior Insights: Gain insights into customer behavior, purchasing patterns, and preferences, enabling more personalized marketing and product recommendations. Demand Forecasting: Leverage Amazon reviews to predict future product demand by analyzing historical review data and identifying trends, helping to optimize inventory management and sales strategies. Accessing and analyzing the Amazon reviews dataset supports market strategy optimization by leveraging insights to analyze key market trends and customer preferences, enhancing overall business decision-making.

Hedonic quality adjustment was first introduced in the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) in 2003 for PCs. Since then the use of hedonics has expanded in UK consumer price statistics to include a further five technology products; digital cameras, laptops, mobile phones, pay as you go phones, smartphones and tablet PCs. This article reviews the use of hedonic quality adjustment in consumer price indices in the UK and internationally. It also details the reasons for changing the method of quality adjustment for pay-as-you-go phones and digital cameras, from hedonic adjustment to class mean imputation, from March 2014 onwards.

Source agency: Office for National Statistics

Designation: National Statistics

Language: English

Alternative title: Review of hedonic quality adjustment

As of 2019, SMBs had higher average review star ratings across all industries than enterprise companies. During the measured period, SMB companies in the financial services sector had an average review star rating of *** out of 5, whereas enterprise businesses only had a *** star rating.