An ArcGIS OnLine map of National Historic Districts and National Historic Sites. Districts that are listed on the National Register of Historic Places (National Historic designation) and the Virginia Landmarks Register (State designation). Districts may logically carry either both designations or the State designation alone. Both of these programs are administered by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources in conjunction with the City of Richmond Bureau of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation. Properties that fall within these districts may be entitled to various development incentives. Note that some districts overlap.

An ArcGIS OnLine map of City's Old & Historic Districts. Represents City of Richmond Old and Historic Districts as designated by local ordinance. Properties that fall within these districts may be entitled to various development incentives and/or regulations.

The Neighborhoods feature class layer describes boundaries of community neighborhoods within the City of Richmond. Neighborhoods contain non-overlapping polygons that are coterminous with the City of Richmond Planning Districts. These polygons were defined according to commonly accepted boundaries of city neighborhoods, as interpreted from the following sources: 1) Sub-Division plats and other historic maps, 2) Civic Association boundaries, 3) Census Tracts, 4) general knowledge of the Division of Housing & Neighborhood Preservation staff. Economic and Community Development:

Richmond-Burton Community High School Dictrict 157

This map is part of the series that covers the whole of Australia at a scale of 1:250 000 (1cm on a map represents 2.5 km on the ground) and comprises 513 maps. This is the largest scale at which published topographic maps cover the entire continent. Each standard map covers an area of 1.5 degrees longitude by 1 degree latitude or about 150 kilometres from east to west and 110 kilometres from north to south. There are about 50 special maps in the series and these maps cover a non-standard area. Typically, where a map produced on standard sheet lines is largely ocean it is combined with its landward neighbour. These maps contain natural and constructed features including road and rail infrastructure, vegetation, hydrography, contours (interval 50m), localities and some administrative boundaries. The topographic map and data index shows coverage of the sheets. Product Specifications Coverage: The series covers the whole of Australia with 513 maps. Currency: Ranges from 1995 to 2009. 95% of maps have a reliability date of 1994 or later. Coordinates: Geographical and either AMG or MGA (post-1993) Datum: AGD66, GDA94, AHD. Projection: Universal Traverse Mercator (UTM) Medium: Paper, flat and folded copies.

HOLC, in consultation with local real estate professionals and local policymakers, categorized neighborhoods in hundreds of cities in the United States into four types: Best (A), Still Desirable (B), Definitely Declining (C), and Hazardous (D). So-called “hazardous” zones were colored red on these maps. These zones were then used to approve or deny credit-lending and mortgage-backing by banks and the Federal Housing Administration. The descriptions provided by HOLC in their reports rely heavily on race and ethnicity as critical elements in assigning these grades. According to the University of Richmond's Mapping Inequality project, “Arguably the HOLC agents in the other two hundred-plus cities graded through this program adopted a consistently white, elite standpoint or perspective. HOLC assumed and insisted that the residency of African-Americans and immigrants, as well as working-class whites, compromised the values of homes and the security of mortgages” (Mapping Inequality). HOLC’s classifications were one contributory factor in underinvestment in a neighborhood, and generally, although not always, closed off many, especially people of color, from the credit necessary to purchase their own homes.The 15 Worcester neighborhood zones included on the map are ordered from Zone 1 (categorized as "Best") to Zone 15, with the highest numbered zones included in the least desirable "Hazardous" category. The exact descriptions used by HOLC to classify the neighborhoods in 1936 are included, and therefore may contain some disturbing language. Many scholars and institutions have focused their efforts on tracking the effects the 1930s redlining maps still have today. The Mapping Inequality project by the University of Richmond has collected and analyzed a comprehensive set of redlining maps for more than 200 cities in the U.S. One of their conclusions is that, for most cities, there are striking and persistent geographic similarities between redlined zones and currently vulnerable areas even after eighty years. See the Mapping Inequality website for more information (https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redlining).This digitized version prepared by the Worcester Regional Research Bureau was based on a scanned copy from the National Archives, obtained thanks to Dr. Robert Nelson, the Digital Scholarship Lab, and the rest of his team at Mapping Inequality at the University of Richmond. Dr. Nelson worked with The Research Bureau directly to track it down in the Archives.Informing Worcester is the City of Worcester's open data portal where interested parties can obtain public information at no cost.

This dataset contains files created, digitized, or georeferenced by Chris DeRolph for mapping the pre-urban renewal community within the boundaries of the Riverfront-Willow St. and Mountain View urban renewal projects in Knoxville TN. Detailed occupant information for properties within boundaries of these two urban renewal projects was extracted from the 1953 Knoxville City Directory. The year 1953 was chosen as a representative snapshot of the Black community before urban renewal projects were implemented. The first urban renewal project to be approved was the Riverfront-Willow Street project, which was approved in 1954 according to the University of Richmond Renewing Inequality project titled ‘Family Displacements through Urban Renewal, 1950-1966’ (link below in the 'Other shapefiles' section). For ArcGIS Online users, the shapefile and tiff layers are available in AGOL and can be found by clicking the ellipsis next to the layer name and selecting 'Show item details' for the layers in this webmap https://knoxatlas.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=43a66c3cfcde4f5f8e7ab13af9bbcebecityDirectory1953 is a folder that contains:JPG images of 1953 City Directory for street segments within the urban renewal project boundaries; images collected at the McClung Historical CollectionTXT files of extracted text from each image that was used to join occupant information from directory to GIS address datashp is a folder that contains the following shapefiles:Residential:Black_owned_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory identified as Black and property ownersBlack_rented_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory identified as Black and non-owners of the propertyNon_Black_owned_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory identified as property owners that were not listed as BlackNon_Black_rented_residential_1953.shp: residential entries in the 1953 City Directory not listed as Black or property ownersResidential shapefile attributes:cityDrctryString: full text string from 1953 City Directory entryfileName: name of TXT file that contains the information for the street segmentsOccupant: the name of the occupant listed in the City Directory, enclosed in square brackets []Number: the address number listed in the 1953 City DirectoryBlackOccpt: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as Black, designated by the (c) or (e) character string in the cityDrctryString fieldOwnerOccpd: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as the property owner, designated by the @ character in the cityDrctryString fieldUnit: unit if listed (e.g. Apt 1, 2d fl, b'ment, etc)streetName: street name in ~1953Lat: latitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationLon: longitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationrace_own: combines the BlackOccpt and OwnerOccpd fieldsmapLabel: combines the Number and Occupant fields for map labeling purposeslastName: occupant's last namelabelShort: combines the Number and lastName fields for map labeling purposesNon-residential:Black_nonResidential_1953.shp: non-residential entries in the 1953 City Directory listed as Black-occupiedNonBlack_nonResidential_1953.shp: non-residential entries in the 1953 City Directory not listed as Black-occupiedNon-residential shapefile attributes:cityDrctryString: full text string from 1953 City Directory entryfileName: name of TXT file that contains the information for the street segmentsOccupant: the name of the occupant listed in the City Directory, enclosed in square brackets []Number: the address number listed in the 1953 City DirectoryBlackOccpt: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as Black, designated by the (c) or (e) character string in the cityDrctryString fieldOwnerOccpd: flag for whether the occupant was identified in the City Directory as the property owner, designated by the @ character in the cityDrctryString fieldUnit: unit if listed (e.g. Apt 1, 2d fl, b'ment, etc)streetName: street name in ~1953Lat: latitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationLon: longitude coordinate in decimal degrees for the property locationNAICS6: 2022 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) six-digit business code, designated by Chris DeRolph rapidly and without careful considerationNAICS6title: NAICS6 title/short descriptionNAICS3: 2022 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) three-digit business code, designated by Chris DeRolph rapidly and without careful considerationNAICS3title: NAICS3 title/short descriptionflag: flags whether the occupant is part of the public sector or an NGO; a flag of '0' indicates the occupant is assumed to be a privately-owned businessrace_own: combines the BlackOccpt and OwnerOccpd fieldsmapLabel: combines the Number and Occupant fields for map labeling purposesOther shapefiles:razedArea_1972.shp: approximate area that appears to have been razed during urban renewal based on visual overlay of usgsImage_grayscale_1956.tif and usgsImage_colorinfrared_1972.tif; digitized by Chris DeRolphroadNetwork_preUrbanRenewal.shp: road network present in urban renewal area before razing occurred; removed attribute indicates whether road was removed or remains today; historically removed roads were digitized by Chris DeRolph; remaining roads sourced from TDOT GIS roads dataTheBottom.shp: the approximate extent of the razed neighborhood known as The Bottom; digitized by Chris DeRolphUrbanRenewalProjects.shp: boundaries of the East Knoxville urban renewal projects, as mapped by the University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab https://dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/renewal/#view=0/0/1&viz=cartogram&city=knoxvilleTN&loc=15/35.9700/-83.9080tiff is a folder that contains the following images:streetMap_1952.tif: relevant section of 1952 map 'Knoxville Tennessee and Surrounding Area'; copyright by J.U.G. Rich and East Tenn Auto Club; drawn by R.G. Austin; full map accessed at McClung Historical Collection, 601 S Gay St, Knoxville, TN 37902; used as reference for street names in roadNetwork_preUrbanRenewal.shp; georeferenced by Chris DeRolphnewsSentinelRdMap_1958.tif: urban renewal area map from 1958 Knox News Sentinel article; used as reference for street names in roadNetwork_preUrbanRenewal.shp; georeferenced by Chris DeRolphusgsImage_grayscale_1956.tif: May 18, 1956 black-and-white USGS aerial photograph, georeferenced by Chris DeRolph; accessed here https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/scene/metadata/full/5e83d8e4870f4473/ARA550590030582/usgsImage_colorinfrared_1972.tif: April 18, 1972 color infrared USGS aerial photograph, georeferenced by Chris DeRolph; accessed here https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/scene/metadata/full/5e83d8e4870f4473/AR6197002600096/usgsImage_grayscale_1976.tif: November 8, 1976 black-and-white USGS aerial photograph, georeferenced by Chris DeRolph; accessed here https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/scene/metadata/full/5e83d8e4870f4473/AR1VDUT00390010/

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Chester Quadrangle, Virginia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (chet_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.MXD) map document (chet_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.LYR) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information (.PDF) document (rich_geology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.TXT) and FAQ (.HTML) formats, and a GIS readme file (rich_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the rich_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). Presently, a GRI Google Earth KMZ/KML product doesn't exist for this map. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (chet_geology_metadata_faq.html; available at http://nrdata.nps.gov/geology/gri_data/gis/rich/chet_geology_metadata_faq.html). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/inventory/geology/GeologyGISDataModel.cfm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 18N. The data is within the area of interest of Richmond National Battlefield Park.

URL: https://geoscience.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/mr002950

The Richmond series map was compiled in 2018 at 1:100 000 as part of the Mineral Occurrence 1:100 000 Compilation series to provide an interpretation of known mineral occurrence information. The map product is available to all government agencies, industry and the public for reference and is located within the Richmond (7556) 1:100 000 map area.

Descriptions of Metropolitan Transportation Commission's 34 Super DistrictsSuper District #1 - Greater Downtown San Francisco: This area, the northeastern quadrant of the city, is bounded by Van Ness Avenue on the west, 11th Street on the southwest, and Townsend Street on the south. This Super District includes the following neighborhoods and districts: Financial District, Union Square, Tenderloin, Civic Center, South of Market, South Park, Rincon Hill, Chinatown, Jackson Square, Telegraph Hill, North Beach, Nob Hill, Russian Hill, Polk Gulch and Fisherman's Wharf. Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island are also part of Super District #1.Super District #2 - Richmond District: This area, the northwestern quadrant of the city, is bounded by Van Ness Avenue on the east, Market Street on the southeast, and 17th Street, Stanyan Street, and Lincoln Way on the south. Super District #2 includes the following neighborhoods and districts: the Presidio, the Western Addition District, the Marina, Cow Hollow, Pacific Heights, Cathedral Hill, Japantown, Hayes Valley, Duboce Triangle, the Haight-Ashbury, the Richmond District, Inner Richmond, Outer Richmond, Laurel Heights, Sea Cliff, and the Golden Gate Park.Super District #3 - Mission District: This area, the southeastern quadrant of the city, is bounded by Townsend Street, 11th Street, Market Street, 17th Street, Stanyan Street, and Lincoln Way on the northern boundary; 7th Avenue, Laguna Honda, Woodside Avenue, O'Shaughnessy Boulevard and other smaller streets (Juanita, Casita, El Verano, Ashton, Orizaba) on the western boundary; and by the San Mateo County line on the southern boundary. Super District #3 includes the following neighborhoods and districts: China Basin, Potrero Hill, Inner Mission, Outer Mission, Twin Peaks, Parnassus Heights, Dolores Heights, Castro, Eureka Valley, Noe Valley, Bernal Heights, Glen Park, Ingleside, Ocean View, the Excelsior, Crocker-Amazon, Visitacion Valley, Portola, Bayview, and Hunters Point.Super District #4 - Sunset District: This area, the southwestern quadrant of the city, is bounded by Lincoln Way (Golden Gate Park) on the north; 7th Avenue, Laguna Honda, Woodside Avenue, O'Shaughnessy Boulevard and other smaller streets (Juanita, Casita, El Verano, Ashton, Orizaba) on the eastern boundary; and by the San Mateo County line on the southern boundary. Super District #4 includes the following neighborhoods and districts: Inner Sunset, the Sunset District, Sunset Heights, Parkside, Lake Merced District, Park-Merced, Ingleside Heights, West Portal and St. Francis Wood.Super District #5 - Daly City/San Bruno: This northern San Mateo County Super District includes the communities of Daly City, Colma, Brisbane, South San Francisco, Pacifica, San Bruno, Millbrae, and the north part of Burlingame. The boundary between Super District #5 and Super District #6 is Broadway, Carmelita Avenue, El Camino Real, Easton Drive, the Hillsborough / Burlingame city limits, Interstate 280, Skyline Boulevard, the Pacifica city limits, and the Montara Mountain ridgeline extending to Devil's Slide on the coast.Super District #6 - San Mateo/Burlingame: The central San Mateo County Super District includes the communities of Hillsborough, San Mateo, Foster City, Belmont, the southern part of Burlingame, and the coastside communities of Montara, Moss Beach, El Granada, and Half Moon Bay. The southern boundary of Super District #6 is the Foster City city limits, the Belmont/San Carlos city limits, Interstate 280, Kings Mountain, Lobitos Creek extending to Martins Beach on the coast.Super District #7 - Redwood City/Menlo Park: The southern San Mateo County Super District includes the communities of San Carlos, Redwood Shores, Redwood City, Atherton, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, Woodside, Portola Valley, and the coastside communities of San Gregorio and Pescadero.Super District #8 - Palo Alto/Los Altos: This Santa Clara County Super District includes the communities of Palo Alto, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, and the western part of Mountain View. Boundaries include the San Mateo County line, US-101 on the north, and Cal-85 (Stevens Creek Freeway) and Stevens Creek on the east.Super District #9 - Sunnyvale/Mountain View: This is the "Silicon Valley" Super District and includes the communities of Mountain View (eastern part and shoreline), Sunnyvale, Santa Clara (northern part), Alviso, and San Jose (northern part). Also included in this Super District is the "Golden Triangle" district. Super District #9 is bounded by US-101, Cal-85, Stevens Creek on the western boundary; Homestead Road on the southern boundary; Pierce Street, Civic Center Drive and the SP tracks in Santa Clara City; and Interstate 880 as the eastern boundary.Super District #10 - Cupertino/Saratoga: This Super District is located in south central Santa Clara County and includes the communities of Cupertino, Saratoga, Santa Clara City (southern part), Campbell (western part), San Jose (western part), Monte Sereno, Los Gatos and Redwood Estates. This area is bounded by Stevens Creek and the Santa Cruz Mountains on the west, Homestead Road on the north, Interstate 880/California Route 17 on the east; Union Avenue, Camden Avenue and Hicks Road (San Jose) also on the eastern boundary; and the Santa Clara/Santa Cruz county line on the south.Super District #11 - Central San Jose: This central Santa Clara County Super District is comprised of San Jose (central area), Santa Clara City (downtown area), and Campbell (east of Cal-17). The general boundaries of Super District #11 are Interstate 880/California Route 17 on the west; US-101 on the east; and the Capitol Expressway, Hillsdale Avenue, Camden Avenue, and Union Avenue on the south boundary.Super District #12 - Milpitas/East San Jose: This eastern Santa Clara County Super District includes the City of Milpitas, and the East San Jose communities of Berryessa, Alum Rock, and Evergreen. Boundaries include Interstate 880 and US-101 freeways on the west; San Jose City limits (Evergreen) on the south; and the mountains on the east.Super District #13 - South San Jose: This south-central Santa Clara County Super District includes the southern part of San Jose including the Almaden and Santa Teresa neighborhoods. Super District #13 is surrounded by Super District #10 on the west; Super District #11 on the north; Super District #12 on the northeast; and Super District #14 on the south at Metcalf Road (Coyote).Super District #14 - Gilroy/Morgan Hill: This area of Santa Clara County is also known as "South County" and includes the communities of Gilroy, Morgan Hill, San Martin and the Coyote Valley. Also included in this Super District are Loma Prieta (western boundary of the Super District) and Mount Hamilton in the northeastern, rural portion of Santa Clara County. This area is bounded by Santa Cruz and San Benito Counties on the south, and Merced and Stanislaus Counties on the eastern border.Super District #15 - Livermore/Pleasanton: This is the eastern Alameda County Super District including the Livermore and Amador Valley communities of Livermore, Pleasanton, Dublin, San Ramon Village, and Sunol. This Super District includes all of eastern Alameda County east of Pleasanton Ridge and Dublin Canyon.Super District #16 - Fremont/Union City: The southern Alameda County Super District includes the communities of Fremont, Newark and Union City. The boundaries for this Super District are the Hayward/Union City city limits on the north side; the hills to the immediate east; the Santa Clara/Alameda County line on the south; and the San Francisco Bay on the west.Super District #17 - Hayward/San Leandro: This southern Alameda County Super District includes the communities of Hayward, San Lorenzo, San Leandro, Castro Valley, Cherryland, and Ashland. The northern border is the San Leandro/Oakland city limits.Super District #18 - Oakland/Alameda: This northern Alameda County Super District includes the island city of Alameda, Oakland, and Piedmont. The Oakland neighborhoods of North Oakland and Rockridge are in the adjacent Super District #19. The border between Super Districts #18 and #19 are the Oakland/Emeryville city limits; 52nd and 51st Streets; Broadway; and Old Tunnel Road.Super District #19 - Berkeley/Albany: This northern Alameda County Super District includes all of Emeryville, Berkeley, and Albany, and the Oakland neighborhoods in North Oakland and Rockridge. The Super District is surrounded by the Alameda/Contra Costa County lines; the San Francisco Bay; and the Oakland Super District.Super District #20 - Richmond/El Cerrito: This is the western Contra Costa Super District. It includes the communities of Richmond, El Cerrito, Kensington, Richmond Heights, San Pablo, El Sobrante, Pinole, Hercules, Rodeo, Crockett, and Port Costa. The eastern boundary to Super District #20 is defined as the Carquinez Scenic Drive (east of Port Costa); McEwen Road; California Route 4; Alhambra Valley Road; Briones Road through the Regional Park; Bear Creek Road; and Wildcat Canyon Road to the Alameda/Contra Costa County line.Super District #21 - Concord/Martinez: This is one of three central Contra Costa County Super Districts. Super District #21 includes the communities of Concord, Martinez, Pleasant Hill, Clayton, and Pacheco. This area is bounded by Suisun Bay on the north; Willow Pass and Marsh Creek on the east; Mt Diablo on the southeast; and Cowell Road, Treat Boulevard, Oak Grove Road, Minert Road, Bancroft Road, Oak Park Boulevard, Putnam Boulevard, Geary Road, and Pleasant Hill Road on the south; and Briones Park, Alhambra Valley Road and Cal-4 on the west.Super District #22 - Walnut Creek: This central Contra Costa County Super District includes the communities of Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Moraga and Orinda. The latter three communities are more popularly known as Lamorinda. The border with Super District #23 generally follows the southern city limits of Walnut Creek.Super

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts statistics for Richmond city, Michigan. QuickFacts data are derived from: Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Census of Population and Housing, Current Population Survey, Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Patterns, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census, Survey of Business Owners, Building Permits.

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Seven Pines Quadrangle, Virginia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (svpn_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.MXD) map document (svpn_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.LYR) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information (.PDF) document (rich_geology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.TXT) and FAQ (.HTML) formats, and a GIS readme file (rich_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the rich_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). Presently, a GRI Google Earth KMZ/KML product doesn't exist for this map. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (svpn_geology_metadata_faq.html; available at http://nrdata.nps.gov/geology/gri_data/gis/rich/svpn_geology_metadata_faq.html). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/inventory/geology/GeologyGISDataModel.cfm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 18N. The data is within the area of interest of Richmond National Battlefield Park.

The Revised Geological Map of the Nelson-Richmond Urban area by M.R. Johnston, F. Ghisetti, P. Wopereis (2021) is a geo-referenced geological map superposed onto the NZTM2000 Topo50 Map BQ 26 (Nelson), This map updates the geology and structural setting of the Late Cretaceous-Quaternary units overlying the Eastern Province terranes, that were originally mapped by Johnston (1979, 1981; 1982). The revised map incorporates new stratigraphic and structural data made available in the last four decades by exposures at building sites, boreholes and trenches, as well as geomorphic information from LiDAR surveys undertaken by the Nelson City and Tasman District councils.

URL: https://geoscience.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/mr001571

The Richmond series map was compiled in 2015 at 1:100 000 as part of the Geological 1:100 000 Compilation series to provide an interpretation of known surface geology information. The map product is available to all government agencies, industry and the public for reference and is located within the Richmond (7556) 1:100 000 map area.

Unchecked.

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Studley Quadrangle, Virginia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (stud_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.MXD) map document (stud_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.LYR) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information (.PDF) document (rich_geology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.TXT) and FAQ (.HTML) formats, and a GIS readme file (rich_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the rich_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). Presently, a GRI Google Earth KMZ/KML product doesn't exist for this map. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (stud_geology_metadata_faq.html; available at http://nrdata.nps.gov/geology/gri_data/gis/rich/stud_geology_metadata_faq.html). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/inventory/geology/GeologyGISDataModel.cfm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 18N. The data is within the area of interest of Richmond National Battlefield Park.

2016 Census of Population Aggregate Dissemination Area (ADA) maps and Dissemination Area (DA) maps for Richmond County, Nova Scotia [19 PDF files].

URL: https://geoscience.data.qld.gov.au/dataset/mr002637

The Richmond series map was compiled in 2018 at 1:100 000 as part of the Geological 1:100 000 Compilation series to provide an interpretation of known surface geology information. The map product is available to all government agencies, industry and the public for reference and is located within the Richmond (7556) 1:100 000 map area.

Refer to the current geographies boundaries table for a list of all current geographies and recent updates.

This dataset is the definitive version of the annually released urban rural (UR) boundaries as at 1 January 2025 as defined by Stats NZ, clipped to the coastline. This clipped version has been created for cartographic purposes and so does not fully represent the official full extent boundaries. This version contains 689 UR areas, including 195 urban areas and 402 rural settlements.

Urban rural (UR) is an output geography that classifies New Zealand into areas that share common urban or rural characteristics and is used to disseminate a broad range of Stats NZ’s social, demographic and economic statistics.

The UR separately identifies urban areas, rural settlements, other rural areas, and water areas. Urban areas and rural settlements are form-based geographies delineated by the inspection of aerial imagery, local government land designations on district plan maps, address registers, property title data, and any other available information. However, because the underlying meshblock pattern is used to define the geographies, boundaries may not align exactly with local government land designations or what can be seen in aerial images. Other rural areas, and bodies of water represent areas not included within an urban area.

Urban areas are built from the statistical area 2 (SA2) geography, while rural and water areas are built from the statistical area 1 (SA1) geography.

Urban areas

Urban areas are statistically defined areas with no administrative or legal basis. They are characterised by high population density with many built environment features where people and buildings are located close together for residential, cultural, productive, trade and social purposes.

Urban areas are delineated using the following criteria. They:

form a contiguous cluster of one or more SA2s,

contain an estimated resident population of more than 1,000 people and usually have a population density of more than 400 residents or 200 address points per square kilometre,

have a high coverage of built physical structures and artificial landscapes such as:

• residential dwellings and apartments,

• commercial structures, such as factories, office complexes, and shopping centres,

• transport and communication facilities, such as airports, ports and port facilities, railway stations, bus stations and similar transport hubs, and communications infrastructure,

• medical, education, and community facilities,

• tourist attractions and accommodation facilities,

• waste disposal and sewerage facilities,

• cemeteries,

• sports and recreation facilities, such as stadiums, golf courses, racecourses, showgrounds, and fitness centres,

• green spaces, such as community parks, gardens, and reserves,

have strong economic ties where people gather together to work, and for social, cultural, and recreational interaction,

have planned development within the next 5–8 years.

Urban boundaries are independent of local government and other administrative boundaries. However, the Richmond urban area, which is mainly in the Tasman District, is the only urban area that crosses territorial authority boundaries

Rural areas

Rural areas are classified as rural settlements or other rural.

Rural settlements

Rural settlements are statistically defined areas with no administrative or legal basis. A rural settlement is a cluster of residential dwellings about a place that usually contains at least one community or public building.

Rural settlements are delineated using the following criteria. They:

form a contiguous cluster of one or more SA1s,

contain an estimated resident population of 200–1,000, or at least 40 residential dwellings,

represent a reasonably compact area or have a visible centre of population with a population density of at least 200 residents per square kilometre or 100 address points per square kilometre,

contain at least one community or public building, such as a church, school, or shop.

To reach the target SA2 population size of more than 1,000 residents, rural settlements are usually included with other rural SA1s to form an SA2. In some instances, the settlement and the SA2 have the same name, for example, Kirwee rural settlement is part of the Kirwee SA2.

Some rural settlements whose populations are just under 1,000 are a single SA2. Creating separate SA2s for these rural settlements allows for easy reclassification to urban areas if their populations grow beyond 1,000.

Other rural

Other rural areas are the mainland areas and islands located outside urban areas or rural settlements. Other rural areas include land used for agriculture and forestry, conservation areas, and regional and national parks. Other rural areas are defined by territorial authority.

Water

Bodies of water are classified separately, using the land/water demarcation classification described in the Statistical standard for meshblock. These water areas are not named and are defined by territorial authority or regional council.

The water classes include:

inland water – non-contiguous, defined by territorial authority,

inlets (which also includes tidal areas and harbours) – non-contiguous, defined by territorial authority,

oceanic – non-contiguous, defined by regional council.

To minimise suppression of population data, separate meshblocks have been created for marinas. These meshblocks are attached to adjacent land in the UR geography.

Non-digitised

The following 4 non-digitised UR areas have been aggregated from the 16 non-digitised meshblocks/SA2s.

6901; Oceanic outside region, 6902; Oceanic oil rigs, 6903; Islands outside region, 6904; Ross Dependency outside region.

UR numbering and naming

Each urban area and rural settlement is a single geographic entity with a name and a numeric code.

Other rural areas, inland water areas, and inlets are defined by territorial authority; oceanic areas are defined by regional council; and each have a name and a numeric code.

Urban rural codes have four digits. North Island locations start with a 1, South Island codes start with a 2, oceanic codes start with a 6 and non-digitised codes start with 69.

Urban rural indicator (IUR)

The accompanying urban rural indicator (IUR) classifies the urban, rural, and water areas by type. Urban areas are further classified by the size of their estimated resident population:

• major urban area – 100,000 or more residents,

• large urban area – 30,000–99,999 residents,

• medium urban area – 10,000–29,999 residents,

• small urban area – 1,000–9,999 residents.

This was based on 2018 Census data and 2021 population estimates. Their IUR status (urban area size/rural settlement) may change if the 2025 Census population count moves them up or down a category.

The indicators, by name, with their codes in brackets, are:

urban area – major urban (11), large urban (12), medium urban (13), small urban (14),

rural area – rural settlement (21), rural other (22),

water – inland water (31), inlet (32), oceanic (33).

Clipped Version

This clipped version has been created for cartographic purposes and so does not fully represent the official full extent boundaries.

​

High definition version

This high definition (HD) version is the most detailed geometry, suitable for use in GIS for geometric analysis operations and for the computation of areas, centroids and other metrics. The HD version is aligned to the LINZ cadastre.

​

Macrons

Names are provided with and without tohutō/macrons. The column name for those without macrons is suffixed ‘ascii’.

​

Digital data

Digital boundary data became freely available on 1 July 2007.

​

Further information

To download geographic classifications in table formats such as CSV please use Ariā

For more information please refer to the Statistical standard for geographic areas 2023.

Contact: geography@stats.govt.nz

This preliminary experimental lithogeochemical map shows the distribution of rock types in the Virginia and Maryland parts of the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The map was produced digitally by classifying geologic-map units according to composition, mineralogy, and texture; rather than by age and stratigraphic relationships as shown on traditional geologic maps. This map differs from most lithologic maps in that the lithogeochemical unit classification distinguishes those rock units having key water-reactive minerals that may induce acid neutralization, or reduction, of hosted water at the weathering interface. The validity of these rock units, however, is independent of water chemistry, because the rock units are derived from geologic maps and rock descriptions. Areas of high soil carbon content, and sulfide metal deposits are also shown. Water-reactive minerals and their weathering reactions yield five lithogeochemical unit classes: 1) carbonate rock and calcareous rocks and sediments, the most acid-neutralizing; 2)carbonaceous-sulfidic rocks and sediments, oxygen-depleting and reducing; 3) quartzofeldspathic rocks and siliciclastic sediments, relatively weakly reactive with water; 4) mafic silicate rocks/sediments, oxygen consuming and high solute-load delivering; and, 5) the rarer calcareous-sulfidic (carbonaceous) rocks, neutralizing and reducing. Earlier studies in some parts of the map area have related solute loads in ground and stream waters to some aspects of bedrock lithology. More recent preliminary tests of relationships between four of the classes of mapped lithogeochemical units and ground water chemistry, in the Mid-Atlantic area using this map, have focused on and verified the nitrate-reducing and acid-neutralizing properties of some bedrock and unconsolidated aquifer rock types. Sulfide mineral deposits and their mine-tailings effects on waters are beginning to be studied by others. Additional testing of relationships among the lithogeochemical units and aspects of ground and surface water chemistry could help to refine the lithogeochemical classification, and this map. The testing could also improve the usefulness of the map for assessing aquifer reactivity and the transport properties of reactive contaminants such as acid rain, and nitrate from agricultural sources, in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

A map of voter precincts within City of Richmond Heights District 4.