The average market risk premium in the United States decreased slightly to *** percent in 2023. This suggests that investors demand a slightly lower return for investments in that country, in exchange for the risk they are exposed to. This premium has hovered between *** and *** percent since 2011. What causes country-specific risk? Risk to investments come from two main sources. First, inflation causes an asset’s price to decrease in real terms. A 100 U.S. dollar investment with three percent inflation is only worth ** U.S. dollars after one year. Investors are also interested in risks of project failure or non-performing loans. The unique U.S. context Analysts have historically considered the United States Treasury to be risk-free. This view has been shifting, but many advisors continue to use treasury yield rates as a risk-free rate. Given the fact that U.S. government securities are available at a variety of terms, this gives investment managers a range of tools for predicting future market developments.

Split into three categories (required, historical, expected), market risk premiums measure the rate of return investors expect on an investment over the risk that investment holds. In Europe, average market risk premiums (MRP) sit between **** and *** percent. Greece sees hike in MRP Although it has a relatively high market risk premium, Greece has seen its rates significantly decrease since 2020. Greece also saw a ****** than average return rate on risk free investments. The same correlation can be seen with Europe’s less risky countries for investment. With Germany seeing some of the ****** market risk premiums and risk free returns in Europe. Required, historical and expected Separating the three types of market risk premiums is straightforward. Required MRP’s differ between investors, as approaches to investment change and measure the rate of return needed for an investment to be made. Expected premiums look at the rate of return, and what they are calculated to come out as, while historical MRP’s look back over a period at the average rate of return that investors previously got in the past.

The UK hedge fund industry, a significant player in global finance, is experiencing robust growth, fueled by a confluence of factors. The market, currently estimated at £250 billion in 2025, is projected to maintain a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 8% through 2033. This expansion is driven primarily by increasing investor interest in alternative investment strategies, particularly in response to market volatility and low interest rates. The burgeoning popularity of strategies like alternative risk premia and event-driven investing is contributing significantly to this growth. Furthermore, technological advancements, improved data analytics, and the increasing sophistication of investment strategies are enhancing the industry's performance and attracting further investment. The UK's established regulatory framework and its position as a global financial hub also continue to draw significant assets to the sector. Competition is fierce amongst established players like Man Group, Brevan Howard, and Lansdowne Partners, pushing firms to innovate and refine their strategies to capture market share. However, regulatory scrutiny and macroeconomic uncertainty pose ongoing challenges. Despite the positive outlook, the industry faces headwinds. Increased regulatory oversight and compliance costs could potentially dampen growth. Geopolitical instability and evolving macroeconomic conditions represent significant risks. Competition from other asset classes, along with fluctuating investor sentiment, can impact capital inflows. Segmentation within the industry, with strategies such as equity, fixed income, and multi-strategy funds exhibiting varying performance trajectories, highlights the dynamic nature of this market. Nevertheless, the long-term prospects for the UK hedge fund industry remain promising, predicated on its adaptability, innovative capacity, and the continued demand for sophisticated investment solutions. Growth is expected to be geographically diverse, with North America and Asia-Pacific regions anticipated to show significant expansion, leveraging the global reach of many UK-based hedge funds. Recent developments include: In January 2023: Tiger Global Management fund is accelerating its transformation from a traditional stock-picking hedge find to a venture capital investment business, with startup bets now accounting for nearly 75% of the firm's assets., In January 2023: SurgoCap Partners, a new hedge fund founded by Maia Gaonkar, started trading on Tuesday with USD 1.8 billion under management, making it the largest-ever debut of a female-led hedge fund.. Notable trends are: Assets Managed in the UK by Client Type.

Every investment carries a risk, and in an uncertain economic environment, this risk can cost investors. In almost all major markets surveyed, the risk premium for office investments decreased between the first and the third quarter of 2022. One of the reasons for the decrease is the rising borrowing costs due to soaring inflation. Dubai had the highest risk premium amounting to 2.92 percent, whereas Singapore, Seoul and Hong Kong had negative risk premiums. What this means is that investors in these markets are hypothetically likely to make higher returns from investment in government bonds than offices.

This paper proposes a flexible-price theory of the role of money in an economy with incomplete idiosyncratic risk sharing. When the risk premium goes up, money provides a safe store of value that prevents interest rates from falling, reducing investment. Investment is too high during booms when risk is low, and too low during slumps when risk is high. Monetary policy cannot correct this—money is superneutral and Ricardian equivalence holds. The optimal allocation requires the Friedman rule and a tax/subsidy on capital. The real effects of money survive even in the cashless limit.

Market risk premiums (MRP) measure the expected return on investment an investor looks to make. For potential investors looking to add to their portfolio, the perfect scenario for a risk-based investment would be a high rate of return with as small a risk as possible. There are three main concepts to MRP’s, including required market risk premiums, historical market risk premiums and expected market risk premiums. United Kingdom shows little return for risk Europe wide, Finland had one of the lowest MRP alongside Poland and Germany. Ukraine had average risk premiums of **** percent in 2024. Having a lower market risk premium may seem bad, but for countries such as the UK and Germany where rates have been consistent for several years, it is because the market is stable as an environment for investment. Risk free rates Risk free rates are closely associated to market risk premiums and measure the rate of return on an investment with no risk. As there is no risk associated, the rate of return is lower than that of an MRP. Average risk free rates across Europe are relatively low.

The datasets for the Role of Financial Investors on Commodity Futures Risk Premium are weekly datasets for the period from 1995 to 2015 for three commodities in the energy market: crude oil (WTI), heating oil, and natural gas. These datasets contain futures prices for different maturities, open interest positions for each commodity (long and short open interest positions), and S&P 500 composite index. The selected commodities are traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). The data comes from the Thomson Reuters Datastream and from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The average market risk premium in South Africa increased to *** percent in 2024. Market premium risk represents the difference between return on equities and a risk-free investment, which is normally associated with short-term government bonds. For comparison, the U.S. market premium risk amounted to *** percent in the same year. Risk-free rate Most analysts consider the U.S. treasury rate to be the risk-free rate for the term of their investment, assuming the United States government will not default. Just as consumers in the Unites States get a credit rating, agencies such as Standard & Poor’s rate countries’ credit risks. Using these data, analysts compute the country-specific default risk, which in turn has an influence on the value of risk-free rate. What influences the return on equities? The economic factors such as political stability in a country, inflation rate, level of indebtment, trade deficit and investments have an influence on the activities of companies and their valuation on the stock exchanges. Apart from the economic cycle, the company’s operations itself, which are reflected in the results published in the financial reports, can boost or diminish the stock returns.

The risk-free rate is a theoretical rate of return of an investment with zero risk of financial loss. This rate represents the minimum interest an investor would expect from a risk-free investment over a period of time. It is important to remember that the risk-free rate is only theoretical, as all investments carry even the smallest of risks. Across European countries, average risk-free rates differed quite significantly. United Kingdom is low risk and low reward When average risk-free rates on a theoretical investment with no risk is ****, like seen in Turkey and Ukraine, the opportunity for high reward investments must seem tempting. But with high rewards come higher risks. Countries such as the UK and Germany have consistently shown *** risk-free rates due to their investment markets’ relative stability. Market risk premiums Market risk premiums (MRP) are a measure that is closely associated with average risk-free rates. MRPs are a measurement of the expected return on investment an investor looks to make. For potential investors looking to add to their portfolio, the perfect scenario for a risk-based investment would be a high rate of return with as small a risk as possible. There are three main concepts to MRPs, including required market risk premiums, historical market risk premiums and expected market risk premiums. Like average risk-free rates, MRPs vary quite widely across Europe.

Snapshot img

Canada Asset Management Market Size 2025-2029

The Canada asset management market size is forecast to increase by USD 9.85 billion at a CAGR of 6.3% between 2024 and 2029.

Canadian Asset Management Market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing number of high-net-worth individuals and the launch of new investment funds. This expanding demographic presents a substantial opportunity for asset management firms to cater to their unique investment needs. However, the market faces notable challenges. Regulatory and compliance pressures continue to mount, requiring firms to invest heavily in technology and human resources to ensure adherence. These pressures stem from increasing scrutiny on transparency, data security, and ethical business practices.
As such, asset management firms must navigate this complex regulatory landscape while maintaining a competitive edge. To capitalize on market opportunities and effectively manage these challenges, firms should focus on innovation, operational efficiency, and strategic partnerships. By staying abreast of regulatory changes and investing in advanced technology, firms can streamline processes, enhance client experiences, and build trust in an increasingly competitive market.

What will be the size of the Canada Asset Management Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

In the dynamic Canadian asset management market, quantitative hedge funds employ sophisticated algorithms to manage credit risk, inflation hedging, and other market risks. Active management strategies, including high-frequency trading and global macro investing, remain popular, despite the rise of passive management and index tracking. Risk-adjusted returns, as measured by metrics such as the Treynor ratio and Sharpe ratio, are a key focus for investors. Currency risk, interest rate risk, and geopolitical risk continue to impact portfolios, necessitating careful portfolio optimization and risk management. Fixed income investments offer potential diversification benefits, but come with their own unique risks, such as liquidity risk and operational risk.
Smart beta and factor investing have gained traction as alternative finance methods for achieving outperformance. Regulatory risk, including changes to tax laws and regulatory requirements, can also impact investment strategies. Market volatility and alternative risk premia are other important considerations for asset managers in the Canadian market. Investors seek to mitigate concentration risk through multi-asset investing and diversification across various asset classes. Performance attribution and portfolio optimization tools help managers evaluate the impact of various factors on returns. Overall, the Canadian asset management market is characterized by a complex and interconnected risk landscape, requiring a nuanced understanding of various market trends and risks.

How is this market segmented?

The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Component

  Solutions
  Services


Source

  Pension funds and insurance companies
  Individual investors
  Corporate investors
  Others


Class Type

  Equity
  Fixed income
  Alternative investment
  Hybrid
  Cash management


Geography

  North America

    Canada

By Component Insights

The solutions segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The Canadian asset management market is witnessing significant growth through the integration of advanced technologies, enhancing asset optimization and management. Technological solutions, including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, are automating processes, improving operational efficiency, and facilitating informed decision-making. Asset tracking and monitoring software is a key offering, providing real-time asset performance insights and minimizing losses while maximizing returns. Scenario analysis and quantitative modeling enable risk management and capital preservation. Digital transformation is driving the adoption of exchange-traded funds (ETFs), private equity, and alternative investments. Wealth management and sustainable investing are gaining traction, with investment advisory services catering to diverse client segments.

Compliance and governance are crucial, with cloud computing and data analytics facilitating regulatory adherence. Portfolio management, market capitalization, and succession planning are essential aspects of asset management, with investment strategies catering to varying risk tolerances and investment horizons. Capital preservation, income generati

We present a consumption-based model that explains a wide variety of dynamic asset pricing phenomena, including the procyclical variation of stock prices, the long-horizon predictability of excess stock returns, and the countercyclical variation of stock market volatility. The model captures much of the history of stock prices from consumption data. It explains the short-and long-run equity premium puzzles despite a low and constant risk-free rate. The results are essentially the same whether we model stocks as a claim to volatile dividends poorly correlated with consumption. The model is driven by an independently and identically distributed consumption growth process and adds a slow- moving external habit to the standard power utility function. These features generate slow countercyclical variations in risk premia. The model posits a fundamentally novel description of risk premia: Investors fear stock primarily because they do poorly in recessions unrelated to the risks of long-run average consumption growth.

The average market risk premium in Canada was *** percent in 2024. This means investors demanded an extra *** Canadian dollars on a 100 Canadian dollar investment. This extra cost should compensate for the risk of an investment based in Canada. What causes risk? As far as country-specific factors are concerned, macroeconomic trends can cause risk. For example, the inflation rate in relation to other countries can change the relative value of an investment. Lower inflation in Canada could weaken the Canadian dollar, reducing the value of Canadian assets in terms of another currency, such as the euro or U.S. dollar. The Canadian context As a country, Canada has a fairly high national debt. Some economists point to this as an increased default risk, since debt servicing can become costly. However, most investors agree that Canada, as an advanced economy, is creditworthy and not at risk of defaulting. A better measure is to look at Canada’s risk premium in the context of interest rates from other countries. These deposit rates can be used as a baseline for the market risk premium of other countries, though they do not include all the factors that have been used to calculate this statistic.

Our paper examines whether the failure of unsophisticated investors to rebalance their portfolios can help to explain the countercyclical volatility of aggregate risk compensation in financial markets. To answer this question, we set up a model in which a large mass of investors do not rebalance their portfolio shares in response to aggregate shocks, while a smaller mass of active investors do. We find that intermittent rebalancers more than double the effect of aggregate shocks on the time variation in risk premia by forcing active traders to sell more shares in good times and buy more shares in bad times. (JEL D14, E32, G11, G12)

Market risk premiums (MRP) measure the expected return on investment an investor looks to make. For potential investors looking to add to their portfolio, the perfect scenario for a risk-based investment would be a high rate of return with as small a risk as possible. Unfortunately for investors, this is unlikely to happen as average market risks increase due to the added risk of investment. There are ***** main concepts to MRP’s, including required market risk premiums, historical market risk premiums and expected market risk premiums. In 2024, average market risk premiums in Portugal decreased from the previous year to reach *** percent. Greece and Turkey highest MRP in Europe In 2023, Portugal, compared to other European countries had a relatively higher market risk premium. Countries with the highest MRP and therefore of the highest investment risk included Turkey and Ukraine. At the other end of the scale was Switzerland, whose market risk premiums averaged half of those seen in Ukraine. Risk free rates Risk free rates are closely associated to market risk premiums and measure the rate of return on an investment with no risk. As there is no risk associated, the rate of return is lower than that of an MRP. Average market risk free rates in Europe (with some exceptions) were relatively low in 2023. The risk-free rate of investment in Portugal as of 2024 was *** percent.

Sources:

German Central Bank (ed.), 1975: Deutsches Geld- und Bankwesen in Zahlen 1876 – 1975. (German monetary system and banking system in numbers 1876 – 1975) German Central Bank (ed.), different years: monthly reports of the German Central Bank, statistical part, interest rates German Central Bank (ed.), different years: Supplementary statistical booklets for the monthly reports of the German Central Bank 1959 – 1992, security statistics Reich Statistical Office (ed.), different years: Statistical yearbook of the German empire Statistical Office (ed.), 1985: Geld und Kredit. Index der Aktienkurse (Money and Credit. Index of share prices) – Lange Reihe; Fachserie 9, Reihe 2. Statistical Office (ed.), 1987: Entwicklung der Nahrungsmittelpreise von 1800 – 1880 in Deutschland. (Development of food prices in Germany 1800 – 1880) Statistical Office (ed.), 1987: Entwicklung der Verbraucherpreise (Development of consumer prices) seit 1881 in Deutschland. (Development of consumer prices since 1881 in Germany) Statistical Office (ed.), different years: Fachserie 17, Reihe 7, Preisindex für die Lebenshaltung (price index for costs of living) Donner, 1934: Kursbildung am Aktienmarkt; Grundlagen zur Konjunkturbeobachtung an den Effektenmärkten. (Prices on the stock market; groundwork for observation of economic cycles on the stock market) Homburger, 1905: Die Entwicklung des Zinsfusses in Deutschland von 1870 – 1903. (Development of the interest flow in Germany, 1870 – 1903) Voye, 1902: Über die Höhe der verschiedenen Zinsarten und ihre wechselseitige Abhängigkeit.(On the values of different types of interests and their interdependence).

ABSTRACT This article assesses the impact of alternative assets on the performance of Brazilian private pension funds. Few studies touch on this topic in Brazil and most only investigate the addition of alternative assets and their impact on the performance. The market of open private pension funds in Brazil has been growing rapidly in recent years and gaining much relevance, especially after the announcement of the reformulation of the Brazilian pension system. In 2018, the Free Benefit Generating Plan (PGBL) and the Free Benefit Generating Life (VGBL) represented more than 94% of total assets in their sector. The Brazilian specially constituted investment funds (FIEs) of PGBL and VGBL private pension plans are characterized by their dependence on fixed income assets. Brazil currently faces an unprecedent low interest rate scenario - which, following a worldwide panorama, seems to be set for a long time - and pension fund managers must search for alternative investments that aggregate both risk premia and diversification. The results of this study may support managers in this little-discussed matter. We compare the performance of FIEs without additional alternative assets versus the portfolio with alternative assets, adding a hedge fund index, an equity mutual funds index, a commodity index, an electric power index, a public utilities index, a gold index, and a real estate index. Several performance measures were used, considering Brazilian regulations and a rebalancing strategy. Our results showed that almost all alternative assets used in this study improved the performance of the Brazilian FIEs of PGBL and VGBL private pension plans, especially the public utilities index and the hedge fund index. Some even improved the portfolio tail risk.

Abstract (en): We assume that domestic (foreign) agents, when investing abroad, can only trade in the foreign (domestic) risk-free rates. In a preference-free environment, we derive the exchange rate volatility and risk premia in any such incomplete spanning model, as well as a measure of exchange rate cyclicality. We find that incomplete spanning lowers the volatility of exchange rate, increases the risk premia but only by creating exchange rate predictability, and does not affect the exchange rate cyclicality.

Market risk premiums (MRP) measure the expected return on investment an investor looks to make. For potential investors looking to add to their portfolio, the perfect scenario for a risk-based investment would be a high rate of return with as small a risk as possible. There are * main concepts to MRPs, including required market risk premiums, historical market risk premiums and expected market risk premiums. In 2025, average market risk premiums in Poland decreased from the previous year to reach *** percent. Greece and Ukraine with the highest MRP in Europe In 2023, Poland was relatively well-placed for average market risk premiums in Europe, compared to other countries. Countries with the highest MRP, and therefore of the highest investment risk included Ukraine and Russia. Poland's risk premiums reached *** percent. Ukraine risk premiums averaged at ** percent in 2023. Risk-free rates Risk-free rates are closely associated to market risk premiums and measure the rate of return on an investment with no risk. As there is no risk associated, the rate of return is lower than that of an MRP. Average risk-free rates across Europe (except for Turkey and Ukraine) were relatively low in 2023. The risk-free rate of investment in Poland was *** percent as of 2023.

This paper aims to evaluate the effects of the aggregate market volatility components - average volatility and average correlation - on the pricing of portfolios sorted by idiosyncratic volatility, using Brazilian data. The study investigates whether portfolios with high and low idiosyncratic volatility - in relation to the Fama and French model (1996) - have different exposures to innovations in average market volatility, and consequently, different expectations for return. The results are in line with those found for US data, although they portray the Brazilian reality. Decomposition of volatility allows the average volatility component, without the disturbance generated by the average correlation component, to better price the effects of a worsening or an improvement in the investment environment. This result is also identical to that found for US data. Average variance should thus command a risk premium. For US data, this premium is negative. According to Chen and Petkova (2012), the main reason for this negative sign is the high level of investment in research and development recorded by companies with high idiosyncratic volatility. As in Brazil this type of investment is significantly lower than in the US, it was expected that a result with the opposite sign would be found, which is in fact what occurred.

Despite increases in the college earnings premium to persistently highlevels, investment in college education remains low. We can understand thisapparent puzzle by considering the risk of attending college, and inparticular the possibility of failing to graduate. Students with areasonable probability of completing college already enroll, and for thosewho do not enroll, the low chance of completion blunts the impact of therising college premium. In the absence of improved college readiness, ourquantitative results suggest that continuing long-standing trends inskill-biased technological change can be expected primarily to increaseearnings inequality, rather than college attainment.