Dataset SummaryThis is a polygon feature layer with the boundaries of the four quadrants of the city of Rochester. This geographic division is used for the service areas for the Neighborhood Service Centers (NSC's) as well as administration of other city programming and services.About the Neighborhood Service CentersThe Neighborhood Service Centers (NSCs) are based on the notion that the best way of responding to neighborhood issues is by teaming residents with City staff to devise and achieve effective solutions.This approach brings City government closer to its citizens and their neighborhoods so that quality of life issues can be addressed quickly and effectively.The City of Rochester has been divided into the four (4) geographic quadrants, each with its own Neighborhood Service Center. Each quadrant in the city also has its own Quadrant Team, an interdepartmental team of professionals dedicated to improving the quality of life in their assigned area. These cross-functional teams are intended to directly solve problems, establish community partnerships, and promote strength and growth in city neighborhoods. Teams meet regularly with community representatives to identify and prioritize issues.For more information please visit the City of Rochester's Neighborhood Service Centers (NSCs) website or the individual quadrant websites listed below:Northwest Quadrant Neighborhood Service Center (585)428-762071 Parkway - First FloorRochester, NY 14608Anna Keller, AdministratorNortheast Quadrant Neighborhood Service Center (585)428-7660500 Norton StRochester, NY 14621Marlen Quintero, AdministratorSouthwest Quadrant Neighborhood Service Center(585) 428-7630923 Genesee StRochester, NY 14611Charles Reaves, AdministratorSoutheast Quadrant Neighborhood Service Center (585) 428-7640320 N Goodman Street - Suite 209Rochester, NY 14607John McMahon, AdministratorDictionary: Quad: Quadrant of the City of Rochester where the Neighborhood Service Center (NSC) is located (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, Southeast). NAME: The name of the City of Rochester quadrant (Northwest, Northeast, Southwest, Southeast). CONTACT: The name of the NSC Administrator for the given quad. PHONE: The phone number of the NSC office. EMAIL: The email of the NSC Administrator. AGENCYURL: The link on the City of Rochester website for the given Neighborhood Service Center (NSC). DESCRIPT: The street address for the given Neighborhood Service Center (NSC). OFFICEPHONE: The office phone number for a given NSC Administrator. Source: This data comes from the Department of Neighborhood and Business Development.

This map symbolizes the relative population counts for the City's 12 Data Divisions, aggregating the tract-level estimates from the the Census Bureau's American Community Survey 2021 five-year samples. Please refer to the map's legend for context to the color shading -- darker hues indicate more population.If you click on each Data Division, you can view other Census demographic information about that Data Division in addition to the population count.About the Census Data:The data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey's 2017-2021 five-year samples. The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing survey conducted by the federal government that provides vital information annually about America and its population. Information from the survey generates data that help determine how more than $675 billion in federal and state funds are distributed each year.For more information about the Census Bureau's ACS data and process of constructing the survey, visit the ACS's About page.About the City's Data Divisions:As a planning analytic tool, an interdepartmental working group divided Rochester into 12 “data divisions.” These divisions are well-defined and static so they are positioned to be used by the City of Rochester for statistical and planning purposes. Census data is tied to these divisions and serves as the basis for analyses over time. As such, the data divisions are designed to follow census boundaries, while also recognizing natural and human-made boundaries, such as the River, rail lines, and highways. Historical neighborhood boundaries, while informative in the division process, did not drive the boundaries. Data divisions are distinct from the numerous neighborhoods in Rochester. Neighborhood boundaries, like quadrant boundaries, police precincts, and legislative districts often change, which makes statistical analysis challenging when looking at data over time. The data division boundaries, however, are intended to remain unchanged. It is hoped that over time, all City data analysts will adopt the data divisions for the purpose of measuring change over time throughout the city.

This map symbolizes the relative percentages of adults living below the poverty level for the City's 12 Data Divisions, aggregating the tract-level estimates from the the Census Bureau's American Community Survey 2018 five-year samples. Please refer to the map's legend for context to the color shading -- darker hues indicate a higher level of adults living below the poverty level.If you click on each Data Division, you can view other Census demographic information about that Data Division in addition to the population count.About the Census Data:The data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey's 2014-2018 five-year samples. The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing survey conducted by the federal government that provides vital information annually about America and its population. Information from the survey generates data that help determine how more than $675 billion in federal and state funds are distributed each year.For more information about the Census Bureau's ACS data and process of constructing the survey, visit the ACS's About page.About the City's Data Divisions:As a planning analytic tool, an interdepartmental working group divided Rochester into 12 “data divisions.” These divisions are well-defined and static so they are positioned to be used by the City of Rochester for statistical and planning purposes. Census data is tied to these divisions and serves as the basis for analyses over time. As such, the data divisions are designed to follow census boundaries, while also recognizing natural and human-made boundaries, such as the River, rail lines, and highways. Historical neighborhood boundaries, while informative in the division process, did not drive the boundaries. Data divisions are distinct from the numerous neighborhoods in Rochester. Neighborhood boundaries, like quadrant boundaries, police precincts, and legislative districts often change, which makes statistical analysis challenging when looking at data over time. The data division boundaries, however, are intended to remain unchanged. It is hoped that over time, all City data analysts will adopt the data divisions for the purpose of measuring change over time throughout the city.

Dataset SummaryAbout this data:This feature layer symbolizes the relative population counts for the City's 12 Data Divisions, aggregating the tract-level estimates from the the Census Bureau's American Community Survey 2021 five-year samples.If you click on each Data Division, you can view other Census demographic information about that Data Division in addition to the population count.About the Census Data:The data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey's 2017-2021 five-year samples. The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing survey conducted by the federal government that provides vital information annually about America and its population. Information from the survey generates data that help determine how more than $675 billion in federal and state funds are distributed each year.For more information about the Census Bureau's ACS data and process of constructing the survey, visit the ACS's About page.About the City's Data Divisions:As a planning analytic tool, an interdepartmental working group divided Rochester into 12 “data divisions.” These divisions are well-defined and static so they are positioned to be used by the City of Rochester for statistical and planning purposes. Census data is tied to these divisions and serves as the basis for analyses over time. As such, the data divisions are designed to follow census boundaries, while also recognizing natural and human-made boundaries, such as the River, rail lines, and highways. Historical neighborhood boundaries, while informative in the division process, did not drive the boundaries. Data divisions are distinct from the numerous neighborhoods in Rochester. Neighborhood boundaries, like quadrant boundaries, police precincts, and legislative districts often change, which makes statistical analysis challenging when looking at data over time. The data division boundaries, however, are intended to remain unchanged. It is hoped that over time, all City data analysts will adopt the data divisions for the purpose of measuring change over time throughout the city.Dictionary: Division: The name of the data division. Total_Popu: The total population of the division. The population is calculated from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 2021 five-year samples. Percentage: Represents the percentage of City of Rochester residents which live in the division. Area_in_Sq: The total area in square miles of a given division. Source:City of Rochester Office of Innovation

This map symbolizes the relative counts of the youth population (total individuals age 0 - 17) for the City's 12 Data Divisions, aggregating the tract-level estimates from the the Census Bureau's American Community Survey 2018 five-year samples. Please refer to the map's legend for context to the color shading -- darker hues indicate more youth population.If you click on each Data Division, you can view other Census demographic information about that Data Division in addition to the population count.About the Census Data:The data comes from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey's 2014-2018 five-year samples. The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing survey conducted by the federal government that provides vital information annually about America and its population. Information from the survey generates data that help determine how more than $675 billion in federal and state funds are distributed each year.For more information about the Census Bureau's ACS data and process of constructing the survey, visit the ACS's About page.About the City's Data Divisions:As a planning analytic tool, an interdepartmental working group divided Rochester into 12 “data divisions.” These divisions are well-defined and static so they are positioned to be used by the City of Rochester for statistical and planning purposes. Census data is tied to these divisions and serves as the basis for analyses over time. As such, the data divisions are designed to follow census boundaries, while also recognizing natural and human-made boundaries, such as the River, rail lines, and highways. Historical neighborhood boundaries, while informative in the division process, did not drive the boundaries. Data divisions are distinct from the numerous neighborhoods in Rochester. Neighborhood boundaries, like quadrant boundaries, police precincts, and legislative districts often change, which makes statistical analysis challenging when looking at data over time. The data division boundaries, however, are intended to remain unchanged. It is hoped that over time, all City data analysts will adopt the data divisions for the purpose of measuring change over time throughout the city.

About this mapMap created in January 2021 that shows all of the 5-digit postal ZIP codes that are contained within or otherwise intersect with the City of Rochester, NY's borders.Data Dictionaries:To view the data dictionaries for the layers in this map, click on the desired layer for more information.

Dataset Summary About this data: This map shows the bike paths of all Pace rides in 2018 in the form of XY coordinate points. The NSC (Neighborhood Service Center) Quadrant feature layer lays underneath the point layer as to give a visual division of activity in each of the four quadrants of Rochester. Note: depending on the basemap you choose, you may have to zoom out and locate to Rochester. Dictionary: Latitude: The latitude location of the Pace BikeShare trip start (in degrees). Longitude: The longitude location of the Pace BikeShare trip start (in degrees). TripID: The unique identifier of a specific Pace BikeShare trip. Action: The state that the bike trip is in. Can have one of the following values: AccessCode: StartTrip: The start of the bike ride Unlock: The bike is unlocked Foreground: Note if the bike started ride Background: Note if bike is in active ride EndTrip: The bike has ended the trip Lock – The bike is locked UserID: The unique identifier of a specific Pace BikeShare user. Date: The date the bike ride occurred. Time: The time of the bike ride. Source: This data comes from the City of Rochester.

Note: These layers were compiled by Esri's Demographics Team using data from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey. These data sets are not owned by the City of Rochester.Overview of the map/data: This map shows the percentage of the population living below the federal poverty level over the previous 12 months, shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. Estimates are from the 2018 ACS 5-year samples. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B17020, C17002Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer will be updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2010 AWATER (Area Water) boundaries offered by TIGER. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico.Census tracts with no population are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -555555...) have been set to null. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. NOTE: any calculated percentages or counts that contain estimates that have null margins of error yield null margins of error for the calculated fields.

Published: January 2024. Updated as needed. Current as of the Publication Date. Map service is also available at: https://gisservices.its.ny.gov/arcgis/rest/services/NYS_Place_Points/MapServer.Centroid point locations for cities, towns, villages, unincorporated places, tribal communities, and selected neighborhoods in New York State. Places that cross county boundaries have only one point location and one county assigned. Only neighborhoods in the following cities are represented: Albany, Buffalo, New York City, Rochester, and Syracuse.Centroid points for incorporated places and Indian Territories are mathematically derived based on NYS ITS Geospatial Services published 1:24,000-scale NYS Civil Boundaries data. Points for unincorporated places and neighborhoods are located based on NYS Department of Transportation 1:24,000-scale raster quadrangle maps and local input. This map service is available to the public. The State of New York, acting through the New York State Office of Information Technology Services, makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the use of or reliance on the Data provided. The User accepts the Data provided “as is” with no guarantees that it is error free, complete, accurate, current or fit for any particular purpose and assumes all risks associated with its use. The State disclaims any responsibility or legal liability to Users for damages of any kind, relating to the providing of the Data or the use of it. Users should be aware that temporal changes may have occurred since this Data was created.

Locations of community gardens with a permit registered with the City of Rochester's Neighborhood Service Centers, as of July 2022

Dataset SummaryAbout this data:This is a Feature Layer of the NEW City of Rochester City Council Districts (Beginning 2024). If you are interested in viewing and downloading a PDF version of the Map, please click HERE. East Council DistrictThe East District shall include all the area described within the boundaries as follows;Beginning on the centerline of the Genesee River and its intersection with East Main Street; Thence easterly along the centerline of East Main Street to its intersection with the centerline of North Goodman Street; Thence northerly along the centerline of North Goodman Street to its intersection with the centerline of Clifford Avenue; Thence easterly along the centerline of Clifford Avenue to the easterly boundary of the City; Thence southerly along the easterly line of the City including the area known as Tryon Park to the southerly boundary of the City; Thence westerly along the southerly boundary of the City to it’s intersection with the centerline of Elmwood Avenue; Thence westerly along the centerline of Elmwood Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of South Avenue; Thence northerly along the centerline of South Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Linden Street; Thence easterly along the centerline of Linden Street to its intersection with the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue; Thence northerly along the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Caroline Street; Thence easterly along the centerline of Caroline Street to its intersection with the centerline of Meigs Street; Thence northerly along the centerline of Meigs Street to its intersection with the centerline of Interstate 490; Thence generally northwest along the centerline of Interstate 490 and the Inner Loop to the centerline of the Genesee River; Thence northerly along the centerline of the Genesee River to its intersection with the centerline of the East Main Street and to the place of beginning.Northeast Council DistrictThe Northeast District shall include all the area described within the boundaries as follows:Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of the Genesee River and Marina Drive; Thence southerly along the centerline of the Genesee River to its intersection with the centerline of the East Main Street; Thence easterly along the centerline of East Main Street to its intersection with the centerline of North Goodman Street; Thence northerly along the centerline of North Goodman Street to its intersection with the centerline of Clifford Avenue; Thence easterly along the centerline of Clifford Avenue to the easterly boundary of the City; Thence northerly along the easterly boundary of the City to the northerly boundary of the City; Thence westerly along the northerly boundary of the City to a point 33 feet easterly from the centerline of Culver Road; Thence northerly 33 feet easterly from and parallel to the centerline of Culver Road to a point 33 feet northerly from the centerline of Hoffman Road produced easterly; Thence northwesterly 33 feet northerly from and parallel to the centerline of Hoffman Road to a point 33 feet easterly from the centerline of Wisner Road; Thence northerly 33 feet easterly from and parallel to the centerline of Wisner Road to the southerly boundary of Durand Eastman Park; Thence easterly along the southerly line of Durand Eastman Park to the easterly line of Durand Eastman Park; Thence generally northerly along the easterly boundary of Durand Eastman Park to the shore of Lake Ontario; Thence westerly along the shore of Lake Ontario to the westerly line of Durand Eastman Park; Thence generally southerly along the westerly line of Durand Eastman Park to the southerly line of Durand Eastman Park; Thence generally easterly along the southerly line of Durand Eastman Park to a point 33 feet westerly from the centerline of Wisner Road; Thence southerly 33 feet westerly from and parallel to the centerline of Wisner Road to a point 33 feet south of the centerline of Hoffman Road produced westerly; Thence southeasterly 33 feet southerly from and parallel to the centerline of Hoffman Road to a point 33 feet westerly from the centerline of Culver Road; Thence southerly 33 feet westerly from and parallel to the centerline of Culver Road to the northerly boundary line of the City; Thence westerly along the northerly line of the City to the easterly line of the City; Thence generally northerly along the said easterly City line to the centerline of Marina Drive; Thence westerly along the centerline of Marina drive to the center of the Genesee River and to the point of beginning.Northwest Council DistrictThe Northwest District shall include all the area described within the boundaries as follows:Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of the Genesee River with the centerline of Marina Drive; Thence southerly along the centerline of the Genesee River to its intersection with the centerline of the Inner Loop; Thence southwesterly along the centerline of the Inner Loop to its intersection with the centerline of Interstate 490; Thence northwesterly along the centerline of Interstate 490 to its intersection with the centerline of Brown Street; Thence southwesterly along the centerline of Brown Street to its intersection with the centerline of the CSX Rochester Sub Line Railroad; Thence southwesterly along the centerline of the CSX Rochester Sub Line Railroad to its intersection with the westerly boundary of the City; Thence northerly following the westerly boundary of the City to its intersection with the shore of Lake Ontario; Thence easterly along the shore of Lake Ontario to the easterly boundary of the City; Thence southerly along the easterly boundary of the City to the centerline of Marina Drive; Thence westerly along the centerline of Marina drive to the center of the Genesee River and to the point of beginning.South Council DistrictThe South District shall include all the area described within the boundaries as follows:Beginning at the intersection of the westerly boundary of the City with centerline of the CSX Rochester Sub Line Railroad; Thence easterly along the centerline of the CSX Rochester Sub Line Railroad to its intersection with the centerline of Brown Street; Thence northeasterly along the centerline of Brown Street to its intersection with the centerline of Interstate 490; Thence easterly along the centerline of Interstate 490 to its intersection with the centerline of the Inner Loop; Thence northeasterly along the centerline of the Inner Loop to its intersection with the centerline of the Genesee River; Thence southerly along the centerline of the Genesee River to its intersection with the centerline of Interstate 490; Thence southeasterly along the centerline of Interstate 490 to its intersection with the centerline of Meigs Street; Thence southerly along the centerline of Meigs Street to its intersection with the centerline of Caroline Street; Thence westerly along the centerline of Caroline Street to its intersection with the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue; Thence southerly along the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Linden Street; Thence westerly along the centerline of Linden Street to its intersection with the centerline of South Avenue; Thence southerly along the centerline of South Avenue to its intersection with the centerline of Elmwood Avenue; Thence easterly along the centerline of Elmwood Avenue to its intersection with the easterly boundary of the City; Thence generally southerly along the easterly boundary of the City to the southerly boundary of the City; Thence generally westerly along the southerly boundary of the City, including Genesee Valley Park, to the westerly boundary of the City; Thence generally along the westerly boundary of the City, including the Rochester‑Monroe County International Airport, to its intersection with the centerline of CSX Rochester Sub Line Railroad and to the point of beginning.Data Dictionary:District: Quadrant of the City of Rochester where the Neighborhood Service Center (NSC) is located (S, NE, NW, E).Source:This data is maintained by the City of Rochester.

About this MapThis map shows the bike paths of all Pace rides in 2018 in the form of XY coordinate points. The NSC (Neighborhood Service Center) Quadrant feature layer lays underneath the point layer as to give a visual division of activity in each of the four quadrants of Rochester.To view the data dictionary for this map, select the desired Feature layer under the "Layers" section below for more information.

BY USING THIS WEBSITE OR THE CONTENT THEREIN, YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF USE. A spatial representation of generalized Oakland County community master plans. These polygons were digitized from each of Oakland's 62 community's future land use map in their master plan. The data was completed in March of 2006 and will be updated as each community amends their plan. The key attribute is Composite Plan representing generalized, countywide future land uses.This data depicts a future land use based on each community's master plan as currently adopted. The data will be updated each time a community amends their master plan. Below is a list recording the master plan and date of adoption that was used to digitize each community. Township of Addison Addison Township Land Use Master Plan - 7/9/2002 City of Auburn Hills City of Auburn Hills Master Land Use Plan - 11/7/2002 Auburn Hills Opkyke Road Corridor Study - 2/1/2007 Auburn Hills Collier Road Area Land Use Study - 1/3/2008 City of Berkley City of Berkley, Michigan Master Plan Update - 1/23/2007 Village of Beverly Hills Village of Beverly Hills Master Plan - 3/28/2007 Village of Bingham Farms Village of Bingham Farms Master Plan - 9/13/2004 City of Birmingham The Birmingham Plan - 1/1/1979 Township of Bloomfield Charter Township of Bloomfield Master Plan Update - 3/26/2007 City of Bloomfield Hills Master Plan of Land Use City of Bloomfield Hills - 8/11/1987 Township of Brandon Brandon Township Land Use Plan Update - 3/14/2000 City of the Village of Clarkston Master Plan City of the Village of Clarkston - 8/4/1997City of Clawson Downtown Clawson Framework Urban Design Plan - 11/1/2004 Master Plan City of Clawson - 1/23/1990 Township of Commerce Commerce Charter Township Master Plan 2003 - 6/28/2004 Commerce Charter Township Master Plan Amendment - 11/27/2006 City of Farmington Master Plan City of Farmington - 2/1/1998 City of Farmington Hills Master Plan for Future Land Use City of Farmington Hills - 3/28/1996 City of Fenton Holly Township Master Plan - 11/10/2003 (Used the Holly Township Master Plan because Fenton's was unavailable) City of Ferndale City of Ferndale Land Use Plan - 6/1/1998 Village of Franklin Franklin Village Master Plan Update - 10/15/1997 Township of Groveland Master Plan for Future Land Use - 5/9/2005 City of Hazel Park Master Plan, Hazel Park Michigan - 3/21/2000 Township of Highland Highland Township Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2000-2020 - 7/6/2000 South Milford Road Corridor Micro-Area Analysis - 4/13/2005 East Highland Commercial District Micro Area Analysis - 12/19/2002 West Highland Micro-Area Analysis - 8/2/2001 North Hickory Ridge Road Micro-Area Analysis - 12/7/2006 Township of Holly Holly Township Master Plan - 11/10/2003 Village of Holly Village of Holly Master Plan - 1/24/2007 City of Huntington Woods Huntington Woods Master Plan - 12/17/2007 Township of Independence Independence Township Vision 2020 Master Plan - 12/9/1999 City of Keego Harbor City of Keego Harbor Comprehensive Master Plan - 9/5/2002 City of Lake Angelus City of Lake Angelus Master Plan - 7/25/1994 Village of Lake Orion Master Plan 2002-2022 - 1/6/2003 Amendment #1 to Lake Orion Master Plan - 3/3/2008 City of Lathrup Village The Lathrup Village Plan - 1/1/1981 Village of Leonard Master Plan Village of Leonard - 10/17/1991 Township of Lyon Charter Township of Lyon Master Plan - 3/27/2006 City of Madison Heights Madison Heights Master Plan: 1990, 2000, 2010 - 10/16/1990 Madison Heights Future Land Use Plan Amendment - 5/15/2007 Township of Milford Charter Township of Milford Land Use Plan Update - 5/27/1999 Village of Milford Village of Milford Master Plan - 3/1/1998 City of Northville City of Northville Master Plan - 2/22/2000 City of Novi City of Novi Master Plan for Land Use 2004 - 12/1/2004 City of Novi Master Plan for Land Use Amendments - 4/16/2008 Township of Novi None (Does not have a Master Plan, assumed to be Single Family Residential) City of Oak Park City of Oak Park Master Plan - 9/9/1996 City of Oak Park Master Plan Addition - Unknown Township of Oakland Oakland Charter Township A Community Master Plan - 1/4/2005 City of Orchard Lake Village Master Plan City of Orchard Lake Village - 6/6/2006 Township of Orion Orion Township Master Plan - 5/7/2003 Lapeer Road Master Plan Update - 4/19/2006 Village of Ortonville The Ortonville Plan - 1/1/1980 Township of Oxford Charter Township of Oxford Master Plan - 7/14/2005 Village of Oxford Village of Oxford Master Plan - 5/10/2005 City of Pleasant Ridge City of Pleasant Ridge Community Master Plan - 9/1/1999 City of Pontiac Pontiac 2010 A New Reality - 12/4/1991 City of Rochester Master Plan: 2000 City of Rochester - 6/3/2000 Downtown Development Area MP amendment - 5/2/2005 City of Rochester Hills Rochester Hills Master Land Use Plan 2007 - 2/6/2007 Township of Rose Master Plan Rose Township - 7/7/2005 City of Royal Oak Master Plan City of Royal Oak - 8/24/1999 Township of Royal Oak A Vision for the Year 2010 Master Plan 1996 Update - 12/11/1996 City of South Lyon Master Plan of Future Land Use City of South Lyon - 1/10/2002 City of Southfield Southfield Master Plan - 1/1/1988 Township of Southfield Southfield Township Master Plan - 11/25/2002 Township of Springfield Springfield Township Master Plan - 3/7/2002 City of Sylvan Lake Sylvan Lake Master Plan 2005 - 4/10/2007 City of Troy City of Troy Future Land Use Plan - 1/8/2002 City of Walled Lake City of Walled Lake Master Plan - 8/1/2002 Township of Waterford Waterford Master Plan 2003-2023 - 1/2/2003 Township of West Bloomfield West Bloomfield Township 2005 Master Land Use Plan Update - 7/26/2005 Township of White Lake White Lake Township Master Plan - 10/6/2006 City of Wixom City of Wixom Master Plan - 8/9/2005 Village of Wolverine Lake Village of Wolverine Lake Land Use Plan - 12/4/1985 Every category identified on the future land use map within each master plan was translated into a composite value. For example, one community may have two commercial districts- Local Commerical and General Commercial. Another community may have three commercial districts- Neighborhood Commercial, Hi-Tech Office, and Retail Commercial. A wide range of uses could be included in these categories, but for the purpose of this feature class, they are all translated into "Commercial/Office." In some cases a category on community's future land use map could not be translated into a single composite category. When this occurred, areas were manually translated into the appropriate generalized category. For example, a Public Lands class on a community's map would be manually translated into the Public/Institutional and Recreation/Conservation composite categories.

Dataset Summary About this data: This map shows the bike paths of all Pace rides in 2019 in the form of XY coordinate points. The NSC (Neighborhood Service Center) Quadrant feature layer lays underneath the point layer as to give a visual division of activity in each of the four quadrants of Rochester. Note: depending on the basemap you choose, you may have to zoom out and locate to Rochester. Dictionary: ObservedAt: The time the location points were recorded.Latitude: The latitude location of the Pace BikeShare trip start (in degrees). Longitude: The longitude location of the Pace BikeShare trip start (in degrees). Source: This data comes from the City of Rochester.

Please note: this data is live (updated nightly) to reflect the latest changes in the City's systems of record.Overview of the Data:This dataset is a polygon feature layer with the boundaries of all tax parcels owned by the City of Rochester. This includes all public parks, and municipal buildings, as well as vacant land and structures currently owned by the City. The data includes fields with features about each property including property type, date of sale, land value, dimensions, and more.About City Owned Properties:The City's real estate inventory is managed by the Division of Real Estate in the Department of Neighborhood and Business Development. Properties like municipal buildings and parks are expected to be in long term ownership of the City. Properties such as vacant land and vacant structures are ones the City is actively seeking to reposition for redevelopment to increase the City's tax base and economic activity. The City acquires many of these properties through the tax foreclosure auction process when no private entity bids the minimum bid. Some of these properties stay in the City's ownership for years, while others are quickly sold to development partners. For more information please visit the City's webpage for the Division of Real Estate: https://www.cityofrochester.gov/realestate/Data Dictionary: SBL: The twenty-digit unique identifier assigned to a tax parcel. PRINTKEY: A unique identifier for a tax parcel, typically in the format of “Tax map section – Block – Lot". Street Number: The street number where the tax parcel is located. Street Name: The street name where the tax parcel is located. NAME: The street number and street name for the tax parcel. City: The city where the tax parcel is located. Property Class Code: The standardized code to identify the type and/or use of the tax parcel. For a full list of codes, view the NYS Real Property System (RPS) property classification codes guide. Property Class: The name of the property class associated with the property class code. Property Type: The type of property associated with the property class code. There are nine different types of property according to RPS: 100: Agricultural 200: Residential 300: Vacant Land 400: Commercial 500: Recreation & Entertainment 600: Community Services 700: Industrial 800: Public Services 900: Wild, forested, conservation lands and public parks First Owner Name: The name of the property owner of the vacant tax parcel. If there are multiple owners, then the first one is displayed. Postal Address: The USPS postal address for the vacant landowner. Postal City: The USPS postal city, state, and zip code for the vacant landowner. Lot Frontage: The length (in feet) of how wide the lot is across the street. Lot Depth: The length (in feet) of how far the lot goes back from the street. Stated Area: The area of the vacant tax parcel. Current Land Value: The current value (in USD) of the tax parcel. Current Total Assessed Value: The current value (in USD) assigned by a tax assessor, which takes into consideration both the land value, buildings on the land, etc. Current Taxable Value: The amount (in USD) of the assessed value that can be taxed. Tentative Land Value: The current value (in USD) of the land on the tax parcel, subject to change based on appeals, reassessments, and public review. Tentative Total Assessed Value: The preliminary estimate (in USD) of the tax parcel’s assessed value, which includes tentative land value and tentative improvement value. Tentative Taxable Value: The preliminary estimate (in USD) of the tax parcel’s value used to calculate property taxes. Sale Date: The date (MM/DD/YYYY) of when the vacant tax parcel was sold. Sale Price: The price (in USD) of what the vacant tax parcel was sold for. Book: The record book that the property deed or sale is recorded in. Page: The page in the record book where the property deed or sale is recorded in. Deed Type: The type of deed associated with the vacant tax parcel sale. RESCOM: Notes whether the vacant tax parcel is zoned for residential or commercial use. R: Residential C: Commercial BISZONING: Notes the zoning district the vacant tax parcel is in. For more information on zoning, visit the City’s Zoning District map. OWNERSHIPCODE: Code to note type of ownership (if applicable). Number of Residential Units: Notes how many residential units are available on the tax parcel (if applicable). LOW_STREET_NUM: The street number of the vacant tax parcel. HIGH_STREET_NUM: The street number of the vacant tax parcel. GISEXTDATE: The date and time when the data was last updated. SALE_DATE_datefield: The recorded date of sale of the vacant tax parcel (if available). Source: This data comes from the department of Neighborhood and Business Development, Bureau of Real Estate.

311 Case Dataset Summary About this data: This data contains information on 311 calls and online requests received by the City of Rochester 311 call center. 311 operators enter this information in on each call or request for service that comes into the call center. Dictionary: Subject: Broad subject of the 311 request or inquiry. Reason: Reason for 311 request or inquiry. Type: Specific type or request or inquiry within the broader subject and reason. Department: City of Rochester department responsible for responding to the request or inquiry. Administration: City of Rochester Administration DES: Department of Environmental Services ECD: Emergency Communications Department Finance: Finance Department NBD: Neighborhood and Business Development NULL: No applicable department RPD: Rochester Police Department Bureau: City of Rochester bureau within a larger department responsible for responding to the request or inquiry. Request Date: Date and time of call or request. Street Name: Street location of request for service. ZIP: ZIP code of request for service. Source: This data comes from the Verint system, used by 311 staff to log and track requests. This dataset is for the calendar year 2021.

This web map visualizes the prevalence of households in a given geography that do not own a computer, smartphone, or tablet. Data are shown by tract, county, and state boundaries -- zoom out to see data visualized for larger geographies. The map also displays the boundary lines for the jurisdiction of Rochester, NY (visible when viewing the tract level data), as this map was created for a Rochester audience.This web map draws from an Esri Demographics service that is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2014-2018ACS Table(s): B28001, B28002 (Not all lines of ACS table B28002 are available in this feature layer)Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 19, 2019National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2010 AWATER (Area Water) boundaries offered by TIGER. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -555555...) have been set to null. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. NOTE: any calculated percentages or counts that contain estimates that have null margins of error yield null margins of error for the calculated fields.