2 datasets found
  1. Improving the Production and Use of Forensic Science, 5 U.S. counties,...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • datasets.ai
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 16, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anderson, James (2022). Improving the Production and Use of Forensic Science, 5 U.S. counties, 2006-2009 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36727.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 16, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Anderson, James
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36727/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36727/terms

    Time period covered
    2006 - 2009
    Area covered
    United States, King County, Pennsylvania, Sacramento County, Allegheny County, Bexar County, California, Kansas, Texas, Sedgwick County
    Description

    This study collection sought to thoroughly understand the creation, testing, and use of forensic science in five jurisdictions across the country. A random sample was selected of recent criminal cases in the following jurisdictions and tracked from investigation to adjudication to understand how forensic evidence functions: Sacramento County, CA: 990 cases Segwick County, KS: 936 cases Allegheny County, PA: 978 cases Bexar County (San Antonio), TX: 936 cases King County, WA: 892 cases The Principal Investigator sought answers to the following seven primary research questions: How often is forensic evidence collected and analyzed and how is it used pre-arrest? What are the outcomes of forensic evidence testing? What is the effect of forensic evidence on arrest and charging? How does forensic evidence affect the plea-bargaining process? What effect does forensic evidence have on conviction and sentencing outcomes? Does the turnaround time for analysis of forensic evidence have any impact on case disposition? Does the institutional configuration of the crime laboratory have any effect on its productivity? Data for the following types of forensic testing are included in this data collection: hair, fibers, glass, paint, gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy / energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX), physical match, drug identification, toxicology, serology, combined DNA index system (CODIS), DNA short tandem repeat (Y-STR), blood pattern, test fire, and comparison scope.

  2. T

    Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in...

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Sep 1, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2020). Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Sacramento County, CA [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/combined-violent-and-property-crime-incidents-known-to-law-enforcement-in-sacramento-county-ca-fed-data.html
    Explore at:
    json, excel, csv, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1976 - Dec 31, 2025
    Area covered
    Sacramento County, California
    Description

    Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Sacramento County, CA was 10332.00000 Known Incidents in January of 2020, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Sacramento County, CA reached a record high of 32478.00000 in January of 2004 and a record low of 10260.00000 in January of 2018. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Sacramento County, CA - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on August of 2025.

  3. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Anderson, James (2022). Improving the Production and Use of Forensic Science, 5 U.S. counties, 2006-2009 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36727.v1
Organization logo

Improving the Production and Use of Forensic Science, 5 U.S. counties, 2006-2009

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Mar 16, 2022
Dataset provided by
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
Authors
Anderson, James
License

https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36727/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/36727/terms

Time period covered
2006 - 2009
Area covered
United States, King County, Pennsylvania, Sacramento County, Allegheny County, Bexar County, California, Kansas, Texas, Sedgwick County
Description

This study collection sought to thoroughly understand the creation, testing, and use of forensic science in five jurisdictions across the country. A random sample was selected of recent criminal cases in the following jurisdictions and tracked from investigation to adjudication to understand how forensic evidence functions: Sacramento County, CA: 990 cases Segwick County, KS: 936 cases Allegheny County, PA: 978 cases Bexar County (San Antonio), TX: 936 cases King County, WA: 892 cases The Principal Investigator sought answers to the following seven primary research questions: How often is forensic evidence collected and analyzed and how is it used pre-arrest? What are the outcomes of forensic evidence testing? What is the effect of forensic evidence on arrest and charging? How does forensic evidence affect the plea-bargaining process? What effect does forensic evidence have on conviction and sentencing outcomes? Does the turnaround time for analysis of forensic evidence have any impact on case disposition? Does the institutional configuration of the crime laboratory have any effect on its productivity? Data for the following types of forensic testing are included in this data collection: hair, fibers, glass, paint, gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC/MS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy / energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX), physical match, drug identification, toxicology, serology, combined DNA index system (CODIS), DNA short tandem repeat (Y-STR), blood pattern, test fire, and comparison scope.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu