Facebook
TwitterAs of 2025, ************* was ranked as the best state in the United States for women's health care and safety, followed by ******** and **********. On the other hand, ******** was ranked as the worst state for women's health care and safety.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditionshttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditions
The dataset contains year, state and age group wise on number of different types of crimes committed against women, number of victims, and their crime rate in Indian states. The types of crimes covered in the dataset include offences under Indian Penal Code (IPC), such as Assault on Women with intent to outrage her Modesty, Acid Attack, Kidnapping and Abduction, Miscarriage, Rape, Abetment to Suicide, Murder, Trafficking, Insult ot the modesty, and crimes under other legislations such as, Immoral Traffic Act, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act - Cruelty by Husband or his relatives, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Cyber Crimes/Information Technology Act, Dowry Prohibition Act, Indecent Representation of Women Act, etc.
Facebook
TwitterHaryana had the highest rates of crime against women in India in 2022 with about *** crimes reported for every 100,000 women. Among the union territories, Delhi had a crime rate against women of *** that year.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States - Employed full time: Median usual weekly nominal earnings (second quartile): Wage and salary workers: Industrial engineers, including health and safety occupations: 16 years and over: Women was 1652.00000 $ in January of 2024, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, United States - Employed full time: Median usual weekly nominal earnings (second quartile): Wage and salary workers: Industrial engineers, including health and safety occupations: 16 years and over: Women reached a record high of 1682.00000 in January of 2023 and a record low of 809.00000 in January of 2003. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for United States - Employed full time: Median usual weekly nominal earnings (second quartile): Wage and salary workers: Industrial engineers, including health and safety occupations: 16 years and over: Women - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on December of 2025.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://researchintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://researchintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the Global Women’s Travel Safety Apps market size was valued at $1.2 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $4.8 billion by 2033, expanding at a robust CAGR of 16.5% during 2024–2033. The primary growth driver for this dynamic market is the rising global awareness of women's safety concerns during travel, which has prompted both technology developers and policymakers to prioritize digital solutions that empower female travelers. Increasing urbanization, a surge in solo women travelers, and the proliferation of smartphones have further accelerated the adoption of these apps, making them an essential component of the modern travel ecosystem.
North America currently commands the largest share of the Women’s Travel Safety Apps market, accounting for more than 35% of global revenue in 2024. This dominance is attributed to the region's mature technology infrastructure, high smartphone penetration, and a strong culture of innovation among app developers. Furthermore, proactive government initiatives and stringent safety policies have fostered an environment where women’s safety is prioritized, encouraging the widespread adoption of digital safety tools. The presence of leading market players and a high level of consumer awareness have also contributed to North America's leadership position, with the United States and Canada emerging as key markets for both app development and usage.
The Asia Pacific region is projected to be the fastest-growing market, registering a remarkable CAGR of 19.2% over the forecast period. This rapid expansion is fueled by the increasing number of women travelers, rising safety concerns, and greater smartphone adoption in countries such as India, China, Japan, and South Korea. Governments and local authorities in these nations are also investing in digital safety solutions and public awareness campaigns, which are driving demand for women’s travel safety apps. Additionally, the region’s burgeoning middle class, coupled with increased international and domestic travel, is spurring investments from both local startups and global technology giants seeking to tap into this lucrative and underserved market.
Emerging economies in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa are experiencing a gradual yet significant uptick in the adoption of women’s travel safety apps. However, these markets face unique challenges, including limited digital infrastructure, lower smartphone penetration, and varying levels of public awareness about travel safety. Despite these obstacles, localized demand is growing, particularly in urban centers where women’s mobility is increasing and safety concerns are more pronounced. Policy reforms and international partnerships are beginning to address these gaps, but the pace of adoption remains contingent on broader socio-economic development and the implementation of supportive regulatory frameworks.
| Attributes | Details |
| Report Title | Women’s Travel Safety Apps Market Research Report 2033 |
| By Platform | iOS, Android, Others |
| By Application | Personal Safety, Emergency Assistance, Location Sharing, Travel Planning, Others |
| By Subscription Model | Free, Freemium, Paid |
| By End-User | Individual Travelers, Corporate Travelers, Travel Agencies, Others |
| Regions Covered | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East & Africa |
| Countries Covered | North America (U.S., Canada), Europe (Germany, France, |
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This feature layer provides a map layer containing Safety Zones for the United States as contained in the Code of Federal Regulation documentation. A Safety Zone is a water area, shore area, or water and shore area to which, for safety or environmental purposes, access is limited to authorized persons, vehicles, or vessels. It may be stationary and described by fixed limits or it may be described as a zone around a vessel in motion. Safety zones may be established around OCS facilities being constructed, maintained, or operated on the Outer Continental Shelf to promote the safety of life and property on the facilities, their appurtenances and attending vessels, and on the adjacent waters within the safety zones.
Facebook
TwitterThe State Traffic Safety Information (STSI) portal is part of the larger Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) Encyclopedia. STSI provides state-by-state traffic safety profiles, including: crash data, lives saved/savable, legislation, economic costs, grant funding, alcohol related crash data, performance measures, and geographic maps of crash data.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Compliance officers, except agriculture, construction, health and safety, and transportation occupations: 16 years and over: Women (LEU0254688500A) from 2000 to 2010 about compliance officers, safety, occupation, full-time, females, health, agriculture, transportation, salaries, workers, 16 years +, construction, wages, employment, and USA.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/34903/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/34903/terms
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. The project sought to address the shortage of sexual assault forensic examiners (SAFE) by delivering and evaluating a comprehensive SAFE training program developed by the International Association of Forensic Nurses (IAFN). To assess if the training was effective, researchers conducted an outcome evaluation using a mixed methods approach, including quantitative pre-post training and qualitative interviews with instructors and students. The evaluation had three main components: 1) to assess training completion, including the percentage of students who completed the training and the factors that contributed to their completion; 2) to ascertain whether students attained knowledge through pre-test/post-tests and the factors that contributed to knowledge attainment; and 3) to determine whether students retained their knowledge using a post-training exam approximately three months following the training, and whether the students incorporated the core concepts of the training into their SAFE practice. The researchers divided the project into 3 studies. Study 1 examined how many students completed the training and what predicted training completion. Study 2a utilized a one-group pre-test post-test design where researchers assessed students' knowledge attainment for 12 online modules. Study 2b utilized a qualitative framework to understand the instructors' pedagogical approach to teaching clinical skills. In addition, researchers conducted qualitative interviews to examine the students' perceptions of the patient care and medical forensic exam skills gained from the clinical component in the SAFE training, and how the clinical training contributed to their skill development. Study 3a explored knowledge retention using an online post-training survey given to students three months following the training. Study 3b utilized the same qualitative framework as Study 2b. Only data for studies 1, 2a, and 3a are available with this collection. The data file has 198 cases and 675 variables. The qualitative interviews for Studies 2b and 3b are not available as part of this data collection at this time.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F1937611%2F82267b1a15f8669ec2a072972bebccb5%2Fquality-of-life-by-us-state.png?generation=1717697280376438&alt=media" alt="">
This dataset provides insights into the quality of life across different states in the United States for the year 2024. Quality of life, encompassing aspects like comfort, health, and happiness, is evaluated through various metrics including affordability, economy, education, and safety. Dive into this dataset to understand how different states fare in terms of overall quality of life and its individual components.
These descriptions provide an overview of what each column represents and the specific aspects of quality of life they assess for each U.S. state.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain
Graph and download economic data for Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Firefighters occupations: 16 years and over: Women (LEU0254704900A) from 2000 to 2024 about safety, occupation, full-time, females, salaries, workers, 16 years +, wages, employment, and USA.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 52 verified US Occupation Safety & Health locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States Construction VIP: saar: Public Safety data was reported at 9.549 USD bn in May 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 9.286 USD bn for Apr 2018. United States Construction VIP: saar: Public Safety data is updated monthly, averaging 8.830 USD bn from Jan 2002 (Median) to May 2018, with 197 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 15.143 USD bn in Dec 2008 and a record low of 6.412 USD bn in Oct 2004. United States Construction VIP: saar: Public Safety data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by US Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.EA002: Value of Construction Put in Place (VIP): Current Price: Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States Safety & Travel Perceptions: I Feel Safe Traveling Outside data was reported at 50.000 % in 23 Sep 2020. This stayed constant from the previous number of 50.000 % for 09 Sep 2020. United States Safety & Travel Perceptions: I Feel Safe Traveling Outside data is updated weekly, averaging 43.000 % from May 2020 (Median) to 23 Sep 2020, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 50.000 % in 23 Sep 2020 and a record low of 35.000 % in 13 May 2020. United States Safety & Travel Perceptions: I Feel Safe Traveling Outside data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Longwoods International. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.Q008: Travel Sentiment.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Abortion is regulated in Mexico at the state level, and it is permitted under certain criteria in all 32 states, except in Mexico City where first-trimester abortion is decriminalized. Yet, more than a million abortions occur in Mexico each year. But most terminations occurring outside of Mexico City are clandestine and unsafe due to profound stigma against the procedure, lack of trained providers, lack of knowledge of where to find a safe abortion and poor knowledge of the laws. While this situation is moderated by the increasing use of misoprostol, a relatively safe method of abortion, the safety of the procedure cannot be assured in restrictive legal contexts. The purpose of this study is to explore women’s experiences with induced abortion in three federal entities with different legal contexts, and whether abortion seeking behavior and experiences differ across these settings. The study was carried out in three states, representing three different degrees of restrictiveness of abortion legislation. Queretaro with the “most restrictive” law, Tabasco with a “moderately restrictive” law, and Mexico state with the “least restrictive” law. We hypothesize that women living in more restrictive states will resort to the use of more unsafe and risky methods and providers for their abortion than their counterparts in less restrictive states. Women who recently obtained abortions were selected through snowball sampling and qualitative data were collected from them using semi-structured indepth interviews. Data collection took place between mid-2014 and mid-2015, with a final sample size N = 60 (20 from each state). Various themes involved in the process of abortion seeking behavior were developed from the IDIs and examined here: women’s knowledge of the abortion law in their state, reasons for having an abortion; the methods and providers used and women’s positive and negative experiences with abortion methods and providers used. Our results indicate that abortion safety is not associated with the restrictiveness of abortion legislation. Findings show that there is a new pattern of abortion service provision in Mexico, with misoprostol, a relatively safe and easy to use method, playing an important role. Nevertheless, while access to misoprostol tends to increase the safety of abortion, the improvement is moderated by women and their informants (relatives, friends and partners) not having accurate information on how to safely self-induce an abortion with misoprostol. On the other hand, some women manage to have safe abortion in illegal setting by going to Mexico City or with the support of NGOs knowlegeable on abortion. Findings demonstrate the importance of decriminalization of abortion, but meanwhile, harm reduction strategies, including promotion of accurate information about self-use of misoprostol where abortion is legally restricted will result in safe abortion.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States - Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Industrial engineers, including health and safety occupations: 16 years and over: Women was 67.00000 Thous. of Persons in January of 2024, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, United States - Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Industrial engineers, including health and safety occupations: 16 years and over: Women reached a record high of 69.00000 in January of 2023 and a record low of 23.00000 in January of 2008. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for United States - Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Industrial engineers, including health and safety occupations: 16 years and over: Women - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on December of 2025.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
United States - Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Locksmiths and safe repairers occupations: 16 years and over: Women was 0.00000 Thous. of Persons in January of 2024, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, United States - Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Locksmiths and safe repairers occupations: 16 years and over: Women reached a record high of 4.00000 in January of 2002 and a record low of 0.00000 in January of 2001. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for United States - Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Locksmiths and safe repairers occupations: 16 years and over: Women - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on November of 2025.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditionshttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditions
The dataset contains year, state and age group wise data on the number of girl children and women who are victims of rape, categorised by their age group from 6 years and below to 60 years and above
Facebook
TwitterCalifornia led the way in gun safety in the United States as of January 2025, with a composite score of 90.5 based on the presence of 50 key gun safety policies. Massachusetts followed, with a score of 86.5, while Illinois rounded out the top three with a score of 85.5. Illinois joins the no-assault weapons club In 2023, Illinois came in seventh place for gun law strength; by 2024, this ranking rose to third, signifying that the state holds some of the strongest gun safety laws nationwide. However, this swift rise up the ranks also suggests that Illinois is still taking action against gun violence, particularly after seven people were killed and dozens were injured in a mass shooting in Chicago during a Fourth of July parade in 2022. In recent years, Illinois has consistently improved state legislation on gun safety and has enacted multiple measures to prevent further harm from firearms, including a statewide ban on assault weapons which was approved in January 2023. The Midwestern state joined eight other states, as well as Washington, D.C., which prohibits military-style weapons. Permissive open carry states dominate the bottom of the class Receiving less than five points each, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Idaho represent the lowest composite score for gun law strength nationwide. Arkansas, Mississippi, and Idaho are among the 25 U.S. states that do not require any permit to carry concealed guns in public, and are permissive open carry states as well. Moreover, these states do not require a permit or a background check to purchase a handgun and also neglect to necessitate any firearm safety training before making the purchase. Such gun safety laws are considered crucial to ensure that firearms are handled properly and do not cause anyone harm. However, it is also important to note that countries with strong safety measures may still experience high rates of gun violence due to illegal gun trafficking. As a result, taking legal action may not fully address all gun-related violence in the area, especially if there remains an illicit way for people to obtain a gun without restriction.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2023, the District of Columbia had the highest reported violent crime rate in the United States, with 1,150.9 violent crimes per 100,000 of the population. Maine had the lowest reported violent crime rate, with 102.5 offenses per 100,000 of the population. Life in the District The District of Columbia has seen a fluctuating population over the past few decades. Its population decreased throughout the 1990s, when its crime rate was at its peak, but has been steadily recovering since then. While unemployment in the District has also been falling, it still has had a high poverty rate in recent years. The gentrification of certain areas within Washington, D.C. over the past few years has made the contrast between rich and poor even greater and is also pushing crime out into the Maryland and Virginia suburbs around the District. Law enforcement in the U.S. Crime in the U.S. is trending downwards compared to years past, despite Americans feeling that crime is a problem in their country. In addition, the number of full-time law enforcement officers in the U.S. has increased recently, who, in keeping with the lower rate of crime, have also made fewer arrests than in years past.
Facebook
TwitterAs of 2025, ************* was ranked as the best state in the United States for women's health care and safety, followed by ******** and **********. On the other hand, ******** was ranked as the worst state for women's health care and safety.