16 datasets found
  1. Enterprise Data Warehouse (Edw) Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC,...

    • technavio.com
    Updated Oct 1, 2002
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2002). Enterprise Data Warehouse (Edw) Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, Middle East and Africa, South America - US, China, UK, India, Germany - Size and Forecast 2024-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/enterprise-data-warehouse-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 1, 2002
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2021 - 2025
    Area covered
    Global, United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Enterprise Data Warehouse Market Size 2024-2028

    The enterprise data warehouse market size is forecast to increase by USD 39.24 billion, at a CAGR of 30.08% between 2023 and 2028. The market is experiencing significant growth due to the data explosion across various industries. With the increasing volume, velocity, and variety of data, businesses are investing heavily in EDW solutions and data warehousing to gain insights and make informed decisions. A key growth driver is the spotlight on innovative solution launches, designed with cutting-edge features and functionalities to keep pace with the ever-evolving demands of modern businesses.

    However, concerns related to data security continue to pose a challenge in the market. With the increasing amount of sensitive data being stored in EDWs, ensuring its security has become a top priority for organizations. Despite these challenges, the market is expected to grow at a strong pace, driven by the need for efficient data management and analysis.

    What will be the Size of the Enterprise Data Warehouse Market During the Forecast Period?

    To learn more about the EDW market report, Request Free Sample

    An enterprise data warehouse (EDW) is a centralized, large-scale database designed to collect, store, and manage an organization's valuable business information from multiple sources. The EDW acts as the 'brain' of an organization, processing and integrating data from various physical recordings, flat files, and real-time data sources. Data engineering plays a crucial role in the EDW, responsible for data ingestion, cleaning, and digital transformation. Business units across the organization rely on Business Intelligence (BI) tools like Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, and data visualization tools to extract insights from the EDW. The EDW is a collection of databases, including Teradata, Netezza, Exadata, Amazon Redshift, and Google BigQuery, which serve as the backbone for data-driven decision-making.

    Moreover, the cloud has significantly impacted the EDW market, enabling cost-effective and scalable solutions for businesses of all sizes. BI tools and data visualization tools enable departments to access and analyze data, improving operational efficiency and driving innovation. The EDW market continues to grow, with organizations recognizing the importance of a centralized, integrated data platform for managing their valuable assets.

    Enterprise Data Warehouse Market Segmentation

    The enterprise data warehouse market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD Billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018 - 2022 for the following segments.

    Product Type
    
      Information and analytical processing
      Data mining
    
    
    Deployment
    
      Cloud based
      On-premises
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
    
    
      Europe
    
        Germany
        UK
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
        India
    
    
      Middle East and Africa
    
    
    
      South America
    

    By Product Type

    The information and analytical processing segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. The market is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing data requirements of various industries such as IT, BFSI, education, healthcare, and retail. The primary function of an EDW system is to extract, transform, and load data from source systems into a central repository for data integration and analysis. This process enables businesses to gain timely insights and make informed decisions based on historical data and real-time analytics. EDW systems are designed to be scalable to cater to the data processing needs of the largest organizations. The use of Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) and Extract, Load, Transform (ELT) processes in data warehousing has become a popular trend to address processing bottlenecks and ensure Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are met.

    Furthermore, business users increasingly rely on these systems for business intelligence and data analytics. Big Data technologies like Hadoop MapReduce and Apache Spark are being integrated with ETL tools to enable the processing of large volumes of data. Precisely, as a pioneer in data integration, offers solutions that cater to the needs of various business teams and departments. Data visualization tools like Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Teradata, Netezza, Exadata, Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, Snowflake, and Data virtualization are being used to gain insights from the data in the EDW. The history of transactions and multiple users accessing the data make the need for data warehousing more critical than ever.

    Get a glance at the market share of various segments. Request Free Sample

    The information and analytical processing segment was valued at USD 3.65 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

    Regional Insights

    APAC is estimated to contribute 32% to the growt

  2. d

    Warehouse and Retail Sales

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.montgomerycountymd.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Mar 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.montgomerycountymd.gov (2025). Warehouse and Retail Sales [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/warehouse-and-retail-sales
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.montgomerycountymd.gov
    Description

    This dataset contains a list of sales and movement data by item and department appended monthly. Update Frequency : Monthly

  3. Data Warehousing Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, Middle East...

    • technavio.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio, Data Warehousing Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, Middle East and Africa, South America - US, Germany, Canada, China, UK, Japan, France, India, Italy, South Korea - Size and Forecast 2025-2029 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/data-warehousing-market-analysis
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2021 - 2025
    Area covered
    Global, United Kingdom, United States, Japan
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Data Warehousing Market Size 2025-2029

    The data warehousing market size is forecast to increase by USD 32.3 billion, at a CAGR of 14% between 2024 and 2029.

    The market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the shift from traditional on-premises solutions to cloud-based Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offerings. Advanced storage technologies, such as columnar databases and in-memory storage, are also fueling market expansion. However, data privacy and security risks continue to pose challenges, necessitating strong security measures. Companies must prioritize data protection and compliance with regulations like GDPR and HIPAA to mitigate risks and maintain customer trust. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies is transforming technology, enabling advanced analytics and insights. Overall, these trends and challenges are shaping the future of the market, offering opportunities for innovation and growth.
    

    What will be the Size of the Market During the Forecast Period?

    Request Free Sample

    The market encompasses the provision of storage systems and related services for managing and analyzing data from various operational and analytical processes. These data and component repositories facilitate statistical analysis, data mining, import export analysis, and other forms of advanced data processing. Virtual and meta data inventory solutions enable real-time views of data from multiple sources, including unstructured, semi-structured, and structured data. Middleware and ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) solutions facilitate data integration from diverse data sources.
    Emerging economies and legacy applications continue to drive market growth, as businesses seek to leverage data for competitive advantage. AI and ML technologies are increasingly integrated into systems to enhance data analysis capabilities. The IT & telecom and healthcare industries are significant end-users, with growing demand for solutions in sectors such as finance, retail, and manufacturing.
    

    How is this Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

    The research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

    Deployment
    
      On-premises
      Hybrid
      Cloud-based
    
    
    Type
    
      Structured and semi-structured data
      Unstructured data
    
    
    End-user
    
      BFSI
      Healthcare
      Retail and e-commerce
      Others
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        Canada
        US
    
    
      Europe
    
        Germany
        UK
        France
        Italy
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
        India
        Japan
        South Korea
    
    
      Middle East and Africa
    
    
    
      South America
    

    By Deployment Insights

    The on-premises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.
    

    The on-premises market caters to organizations that prefer installing and managing solutions on their own servers. This model's appeal is due to factors like data security, control, and end-to-end quality control. On-premises solutions offer workflow streamlining, reporting, and faster response times. The data's security is a significant concern, and the complete ownership and management by the buyer organization ensure its protection.

    Key drivers for this segment include the need for data governance, compliance, and the ability to integrate various data sources seamlessly. Additionally, industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where data security is paramount, often opt for on-premises solutions. These systems enable advanced analytics, business intelligence, and real-time data processing, providing valuable insights for strategic decision-making.

    Get a glance at the Data Warehousing Industry report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

    The on-premises segment was valued at USD 11.33 billion in 2019 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

    Regional Analysis

    North America is estimated to contribute 50% to the growth of the global market during the forecast period.
    

    Technavio's analysts have elaborately explained the regional trends and drivers that shape the market during the forecast period.

    For more insights on the market share of various regions, Request Free Sample

    The market continues to thrive due to the region's early adoption of advanced technologies in industries such as manufacturing, retail, and banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI). The presence and penetration of leading companies In these sectors fuel market growth. With several advanced economies in North America, the requirement for data warehousing, including data processing, outsourcing, and Internet services and infrastructure, is significant.

    Additionally, the integration of cloud-based services, automation solutions, and AI with operational and supply chain processes

  4. Virginia Springs/Groundwater Layers - 2023

    • data.virginia.gov
    • opendata.winchesterva.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Oct 23, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (2024). Virginia Springs/Groundwater Layers - 2023 [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/virginia-springs-groundwater-layers-2023
    Explore at:
    html, arcgis geoservices rest apiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Virginia Department of Environmental Qualityhttps://deq.virginia.gov/
    Area covered
    Hot Springs
    Description
    The VDEQ Spring SITES database contains data describing the geographic locations and site attributes of natural springs throughout the commonwealth. This data coverage continues to evolve and contains only spring locations known to exist with a reasonable degree of certainty on the date of publication. The dataset does not replace site specific inventorying or receptor surveys but can be used as a starting point. VDEQ's initial geospatial dataset of approximately 325 springs was formed in 2008 by digitizing historical spring information sheets created by State Water Control Board geologists in the 1970s through early 1990s. Additional data has been consolidated from the EPA STORET database, the U.S. Geological Survey's Ground Water Site Inventory (GWSI) and Geographic Names Inventory System (GNIS), the Virginia Department of Health SDWIS database, the Virginia DEQ Virginia Water Use Data Set (VWUDS), the Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Water Resources and Power Bulletin No. 1: "Springs of Virginia" by Collins et al., 1930 as well as several VDWR&P Surface Water Supply bulletins from the 1940's - 1950's. A 1992 Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries / Virginia Tech sponsored study by Helfrich et al. titled "Evaluation of the Natural Springs of Virginia: Fisheries Management Implications", a 2004 Rockbridge County groundwater resources report written by Frits van der Leeden, and several smaller datasets from consultants and citizens were evaluated and added to the database when confidence in locational accuracy was high or could be verified with aerial or LIDAR imagery. Significant contributions have been made throughout the years by VDEQ Groundwater Characterization staff site visits as well as other geologists working in the region including: Matt Heller at Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources (VDMME), Wil Orndorff at the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Karst Program (VDCR), and David Nelms and Dan Doctor of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Substantial effort has been made to improve locational accuracy and remove duplication present between data sources. Hundreds of spring locations that were originally obtained using topographic maps or unknown methods were updated to sub-meter locational accuracy using post-processed differential GPS (PPGPS) and through the use of several generations of aerial imagery (2002-2017) obtained from Virginia's Geographic Information Network (VGIN) and 1-meter LIDAR, where available. Scores of new spring locations were also obtained by systematic quadrangle by quadrangle analysis in areas of the Shenandoah Valley where 1-meter LIDAR datasets where obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey. Future improvements to the dataset will result when statewide 1-meter LIDAR datasets becomes available and through continued field work by DEQ staff and other contributors working in the region. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to correct mistakes or to contribute to the database.

    The VDEQ Spring FIELD MEASUREMENTS database contains data describing field derived physio-chemical properties of spring discharges measured throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. Field visits compiled in this dataset were performed from 1928 to 2019 by geologists with the State Water Control Board, the Virginia Division of Water and Power, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Geological Survey with contributions from other sources as noted. Values of -9999 indicate that measurements were not performed for the referenced parameter. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to add data to the database or correct errors.


    The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a geodatabase containing groundwater sample information collected from springs throughout Virginia. Sample specific information include: location and site information, measured field parameters, and lab verified quantifications of major ionic concentrations, trace element concentrations, nutrient concentrations, and radiological data. The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a subset of the VDEQ GWCHEM database which is a flat-file geodatabase containing groundwater sample information from groundwater wells and springs throughout Virginia. Sample information has been correlated via DEQ Well # and projected using coordinates in VDEQ_Spring_SITES database. The GWCHEM database is comprised of historic groundwater sample data originally archived in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data warehouse. Archived STORET data originated as groundwater sample data collected and uploaded by Virginia State Water Control Board Personnel. While groundwater sample data in the STORET data warehouse are static, new groundwater sample data are periodically uploaded to NWIS and spring laboratory WQ data reflect NWIS downloaded on 9/30/2019. Recent groundwater sample data collected by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) personnel as part of the Ambient Groundwater Sampling Program are entered into the database as lab results are made available by the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS). When possible, charge balances were calculated for samples with reported values for major ions including (at a minimum) calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate. Reported values for Nitrate as N, carbonate, and fluoride were included in the charge balance calculation when available. Field determined values for bicarbonate and carbonate were used in the charge balance calculation when available. For much of the legacy DEQ groundwater sample data, bicarbonate values were derived from lab reported values of alkalinity (as mg/CaCO3) under the assumption that there was no contribution by carbonate to the reported alkalinity value. Charge balance values are reported in the "Charge Balance" column of the GWCHEM geodatabase. The closer the charge balance value is to unity (1), the lower the assumed charge balance error.In order to preserve the numerical capabilities of the database, non- numeric lab qualifiers were given the following numeric identifiers:- (minus sign) = less than the concentration specified to the right of the sign-11110 = estimated-22220 = presence verified but not quantified-33330 = radchem non-detect, below sslc-4440 = analyzed for but not detected-55550 = greater than the concentration to the right of the zero-66660 = sample held beyond normal holding time-77770 = quality control failure. Data not valid.-88880 = sample held beyond normal holding time. Sample analyzed for but not detected. Value stored is limit of detection for proces in use.-11120 = Value reported is less than the criteria of detection.-9999 = no data (parameter not quantified)

    A more in depth descprition and hydrogeologic analysis of the database can be found here
    An in Depth data fact sheet can be found here
  5. VDEQ Springs WQ

    • opendata.winchesterva.gov
    Updated Aug 31, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    maddie.moore_VADEQ (2023). VDEQ Springs WQ [Dataset]. https://opendata.winchesterva.gov/bs/dataset/vdeq-springs-wq/resource/3bd550a6-ef2b-40df-9f11-db84dcece51f?inner_span=True
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Virginia Department of Environmental Qualityhttps://deq.virginia.gov/
    Authors
    maddie.moore_VADEQ
    Area covered
    Description

    The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a geodatabase containing groundwater sample information collected from springs throughout Virginia. Sample specific information include: location and site information, measured field parameters, and lab verified quantifications of major ionic concentrations, trace element concentrations, nutrient concentrations, and radiological data. The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a subset of the VDEQ GWCHEM database which is a flat-file geodatabase containing groundwater sample information from groundwater wells and springs throughout Virginia. Sample information has been correlated via DEQ Well # and projected using coordinates in VDEQ_Spring_SITES database. The GWCHEM database is comprised of historic groundwater sample data originally archived in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data warehouse. Archived STORET data originated as groundwater sample data collected and uploaded by Virginia State Water Control Board Personnel. While groundwater sample data in the STORET data warehouse are static, new groundwater sample data are periodically uploaded to NWIS and spring laboratory WQ data reflect NWIS downloaded on 9/30/2019. Recent groundwater sample data collected by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) personnel as part of the Ambient Groundwater Sampling Program are entered into the database as lab results are made available by the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS). When possible, charge balances were calculated for samples with reported values for major ions including (at a minimum) calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate. Reported values for Nitrate as N, carbonate, and fluoride were included in the charge balance calculation when available. Field determined values for bicarbonate and carbonate were used in the charge balance calculation when available. For much of the legacy DEQ groundwater sample data, bicarbonate values were derived from lab reported values of alkalinity (as mg/CaCO3) under the assumption that there was no contribution by carbonate to the reported alkalinity value. Charge balance values are reported in the "Charge Balance" column of the GWCHEM geodatabase. The closer the charge balance value is to unity (1), the lower the assumed charge balance error.In order to preserve the numerical capabilities of the database, non- numeric lab qualifiers were given the following numeric identifiers:- (minus sign) = less than the concentration specified to the right of the sign-11110 = estimated-22220 = presence verified but not quantified-33330 = radchem non-detect, below sslc-4440 = analyzed for but not detected-55550 = greater than the concentration to the right of the zero-66660 = sample held beyond normal holding time-77770 = quality control failure. Data not valid.-88880 = sample held beyond normal holding time. Sample analyzed for but not detected. Value stored is limit of detection for proces in use.-11120 = Value reported is less than the criteria of detection.-9999 = no data (parameter not quantified)

  6. d

    NC SELDM simulation outputs processed (R scripts) [child item]: Application...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). NC SELDM simulation outputs processed (R scripts) [child item]: Application of the North Carolina Stochastic Empirical Loading and Dilution Model (SELDM) to Assess Potential Impacts of Highway Runoff [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/nc-seldm-simulation-outputs-processed-r-scripts-child-item-application-of-the-north-caroli
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    North Carolina
    Description

    In 2013, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in partnership with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published a new national stormwater quality model called the Stochastic Empirical Loading Dilution Model (SELDM; Granato, 2013). The model is optimized for roadway projects but in theory can be applied to a broad range of development types. SELDM is a statistically-based empirical model pre-populated with much of the data required to successfully run the application (Granato, 2013). The model uses Monte Carlo methods (as opposed to deterministic methods) to generate a wide range of precipitation events and stormwater discharges coupled with water-quality constituent concentrations and loads from the upstream basin and highway site. SELDM is particularly useful for stormwater managers in its ability to provide the statistical probability of a water-quality standard exceedance that could occur downstream of a stormwater discharge location during the period of record simulated as part of a SELDM analysis. SELDM can be used to model a variety of Best Management Practices (BMPs), which allows the user to evaluate the subsequent instream water-quality benefit of different stormwater treatment devices. This functionality makes the model well suited for supporting BMP-specific cost/benefit analyses. In 2015, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) initiated a partnership with the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (Raleigh, North Carolina office) to enhance the national SELDM model with additional data specific to North Carolina (NC) to improve the model’s predictive performance across the State. Specific USGS data incorporated to enhance the NC SELDM model included selected North Carolina streamflow data as well as water-quality transport curves for selected constituents. SELDM streamflow statistics (based on data through the 2015 water year) were computed for 266 continuous-record streamgages and updated in the StreamStats database, which is accessible from the USGS StreamStats application for North Carolina (available online via https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/). Instantaneous streamflow data available at 30 selected continuous-record streamgages across North Carolina, with drainage areas ranging from 4.12 to 63.3 square miles, were used to develop site-specific recession ratio statistics. Water-quality data through the 2016 water year were used to develop water-quality transport curves for 27 streamgages for the following constituents: suspended sediment concentration, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, turbidity, copper, lead, and zinc. The NCDOT identified NC highway-runoff research reports containing water-quality and quantity data available from non-USGS sources. These data were reviewed by USGS and – where deemed acceptable – were uploaded into the FHWA Highway-Runoff Database, the data warehouse and preprocessor for SELDM (Granato and others, 2018; Granato and Cazenas, 2009; Smith and Granato, 2010). Based on the analysis techniques documented by Granato (2014) in a national BMP study and using available water-quality sample data from selected highway-runoff and BMP site pairs, performance data from the NC highway-runoff research reports were also analyzed and incorporated into the NC SELDM model for three BMP types. Results of analyses completed during development of the NC SELDM model are documented in Weaver and others (2019). In 2018, USGS and NCDOT initiated an additional “phase 2” study for the NC SELDM model to complete numerous model simulations to develop an NC_SELDM_Catalog (Microsoft Excel spreadsheet) of outputs for a wide range of highway catchment and upstream basin variables. A total of 74,880 SELDM simulations were completed across the Piedmont, Blue Ridge, and Coastal Plain regions (24,960 per region) in North Carolina. Within each region, the completed simulations represented 12,480 design scenarios (one each using the grass swale and bioretention BMP device for treatment of runoff). The overall purpose of the catalog is to provide a tool to NCDOT and others to use during the transportation design process to rapidly assess the potential level of BMP that may be needed for treatment of highway runoff.

  7. VDEQ Springs WQ

    • opendata.winchesterva.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Virginia State Data (2023). VDEQ Springs WQ [Dataset]. https://opendata.winchesterva.gov/dataset/vdeq-springs-wq
    Explore at:
    gdb, html, txt, gpkg, zip, xlsx, arcgis geoservices rest api, geojson, csv, kmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Virginia Department of Environmental Qualityhttps://deq.virginia.gov/
    Authors
    Virginia State Data
    Description
    The VDEQ Spring SITES database contains data describing the geographic locations and site attributes of natural springs throughout the commonwealth. This data coverage continues to evolve and contains only spring locations known to exist with a reasonable degree of certainty on the date of publication. The dataset does not replace site specific inventorying or receptor surveys but can be used as a starting point. VDEQ's initial geospatial dataset of approximately 325 springs was formed in 2008 by digitizing historical spring information sheets created by State Water Control Board geologists in the 1970s through early 1990s. Additional data has been consolidated from the EPA STORET database, the U.S. Geological Survey's Ground Water Site Inventory (GWSI) and Geographic Names Inventory System (GNIS), the Virginia Department of Health SDWIS database, the Virginia DEQ Virginia Water Use Data Set (VWUDS), the Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Water Resources and Power Bulletin No. 1: "Springs of Virginia" by Collins et al., 1930 as well as several VDWR&P Surface Water Supply bulletins from the 1940's - 1950's. A 1992 Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries / Virginia Tech sponsored study by Helfrich et al. titled "Evaluation of the Natural Springs of Virginia: Fisheries Management Implications", a 2004 Rockbridge County groundwater resources report written by Frits van der Leeden, and several smaller datasets from consultants and citizens were evaluated and added to the database when confidence in locational accuracy was high or could be verified with aerial or LIDAR imagery. Significant contributions have been made throughout the years by VDEQ Groundwater Characterization staff site visits as well as other geologists working in the region including: Matt Heller at Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources (VDMME), Wil Orndorff at the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Karst Program (VDCR), and David Nelms and Dan Doctor of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Substantial effort has been made to improve locational accuracy and remove duplication present between data sources. Hundreds of spring locations that were originally obtained using topographic maps or unknown methods were updated to sub-meter locational accuracy using post-processed differential GPS (PPGPS) and through the use of several generations of aerial imagery (2002-2017) obtained from Virginia's Geographic Information Network (VGIN) and 1-meter LIDAR, where available. Scores of new spring locations were also obtained by systematic quadrangle by quadrangle analysis in areas of the Shenandoah Valley where 1-meter LIDAR datasets where obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey. Future improvements to the dataset will result when statewide 1-meter LIDAR datasets becomes available and through continued field work by DEQ staff and other contributors working in the region. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to correct mistakes or to contribute to the database.

    The VDEQ Spring FIELD MEASUREMENTS database contains data describing field derived physio-chemical properties of spring discharges measured throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. Field visits compiled in this dataset were performed from 1928 to 2019 by geologists with the State Water Control Board, the Virginia Division of Water and Power, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Geological Survey with contributions from other sources as noted. Values of -9999 indicate that measurements were not performed for the referenced parameter. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to add data to the database or correct errors.


    The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a geodatabase containing groundwater sample information collected from springs throughout Virginia. Sample specific information include: location and site information, measured field parameters, and lab verified quantifications of major ionic concentrations, trace element concentrations, nutrient concentrations, and radiological data. The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a subset of the VDEQ GWCHEM database which is a flat-file geodatabase containing groundwater sample information from groundwater wells and springs throughout Virginia. Sample information has been correlated via DEQ Well # and projected using coordinates in VDEQ_Spring_SITES database. The GWCHEM database is comprised of historic groundwater sample data originally archived in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data warehouse. Archived STORET data originated as groundwater sample data collected and uploaded by Virginia State Water Control Board Personnel. While groundwater sample data in the STORET data warehouse are static, new groundwater sample data are periodically uploaded to NWIS and spring laboratory WQ data reflect NWIS downloaded on 9/30/2019. Recent groundwater sample data collected by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) personnel as part of the Ambient Groundwater Sampling Program are entered into the database as lab results are made available by the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS). When possible, charge balances were calculated for samples with reported values for major ions including (at a minimum) calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate. Reported values for Nitrate as N, carbonate, and fluoride were included in the charge balance calculation when available. Field determined values for bicarbonate and carbonate were used in the charge balance calculation when available. For much of the legacy DEQ groundwater sample data, bicarbonate values were derived from lab reported values of alkalinity (as mg/CaCO3) under the assumption that there was no contribution by carbonate to the reported alkalinity value. Charge balance values are reported in the "Charge Balance" column of the GWCHEM geodatabase. The closer the charge balance value is to unity (1), the lower the assumed charge balance error.In order to preserve the numerical capabilities of the database, non- numeric lab qualifiers were given the following numeric identifiers:- (minus sign) = less than the concentration specified to the right of the sign-11110 = estimated-22220 = presence verified but not quantified-33330 = radchem non-detect, below sslc-4440 = analyzed for but not detected-55550 = greater than the concentration to the right of the zero-66660 = sample held beyond normal holding time-77770 = quality control failure. Data not valid.-88880 = sample held beyond normal holding time. Sample analyzed for but not detected. Value stored is limit of detection for proces in use.-11120 = Value reported is less than the criteria of detection.-9999 = no data (parameter not quantified)

    A more in depth descprition and hydrogeologic analysis of the database can be found here
    An in Depth data fact sheet can be found here
  8. Data Warehousing Market - Size, Share, & Industry Analysis

    • mordorintelligence.com
    pdf,excel,csv,ppt
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mordor Intelligence, Data Warehousing Market - Size, Share, & Industry Analysis [Dataset]. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-active-data-warehousing-market-industry
    Explore at:
    pdf,excel,csv,pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Mordor Intelligence
    License

    https://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2019 - 2030
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    The Report Covers Global Active Data Warehousing Market Companies and it is segmented by Type of Deployment (On-premise, Cloud, and Hybrid), Size of Enterprise (Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Large Enterprises), Industry Vertical (BFSI, Manufacturing, Healthcare, Retail), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World). The market size and forecast are provided in terms of values (USD billion) for all the above segments.

  9. VDEQ Springs FIELD MEASUREMENTS

    • data.virginia.gov
    • opendata.winchesterva.gov
    Updated Aug 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (2023). VDEQ Springs FIELD MEASUREMENTS [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/vdeq-springs-field-measurements
    Explore at:
    kml, csv, geojson, gpkg, xlsx, gdb, txt, zip, arcgis geoservices rest api, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 31, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Virginia Department of Environmental Qualityhttps://deq.virginia.gov/
    Description
    The VDEQ Spring SITES database contains data describing the geographic locations and site attributes of natural springs throughout the commonwealth. This data coverage continues to evolve and contains only spring locations known to exist with a reasonable degree of certainty on the date of publication. The dataset does not replace site specific inventorying or receptor surveys but can be used as a starting point. VDEQ's initial geospatial dataset of approximately 325 springs was formed in 2008 by digitizing historical spring information sheets created by State Water Control Board geologists in the 1970s through early 1990s. Additional data has been consolidated from the EPA STORET database, the U.S. Geological Survey's Ground Water Site Inventory (GWSI) and Geographic Names Inventory System (GNIS), the Virginia Department of Health SDWIS database, the Virginia DEQ Virginia Water Use Data Set (VWUDS), the Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Water Resources and Power Bulletin No. 1: "Springs of Virginia" by Collins et al., 1930 as well as several VDWR&P Surface Water Supply bulletins from the 1940's - 1950's. A 1992 Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries / Virginia Tech sponsored study by Helfrich et al. titled "Evaluation of the Natural Springs of Virginia: Fisheries Management Implications", a 2004 Rockbridge County groundwater resources report written by Frits van der Leeden, and several smaller datasets from consultants and citizens were evaluated and added to the database when confidence in locational accuracy was high or could be verified with aerial or LIDAR imagery. Significant contributions have been made throughout the years by VDEQ Groundwater Characterization staff site visits as well as other geologists working in the region including: Matt Heller at Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources (VDMME), Wil Orndorff at the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Karst Program (VDCR), and David Nelms and Dan Doctor of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Substantial effort has been made to improve locational accuracy and remove duplication present between data sources. Hundreds of spring locations that were originally obtained using topographic maps or unknown methods were updated to sub-meter locational accuracy using post-processed differential GPS (PPGPS) and through the use of several generations of aerial imagery (2002-2017) obtained from Virginia's Geographic Information Network (VGIN) and 1-meter LIDAR, where available. Scores of new spring locations were also obtained by systematic quadrangle by quadrangle analysis in areas of the Shenandoah Valley where 1-meter LIDAR datasets where obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey. Future improvements to the dataset will result when statewide 1-meter LIDAR datasets becomes available and through continued field work by DEQ staff and other contributors working in the region. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to correct mistakes or to contribute to the database.

    The VDEQ Spring FIELD MEASUREMENTS database contains data describing field derived physio-chemical properties of spring discharges measured throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. Field visits compiled in this dataset were performed from 1928 to 2019 by geologists with the State Water Control Board, the Virginia Division of Water and Power, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Geological Survey with contributions from other sources as noted. Values of -9999 indicate that measurements were not performed for the referenced parameter. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to add data to the database or correct errors.


    The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a geodatabase containing groundwater sample information collected from springs throughout Virginia. Sample specific information include: location and site information, measured field parameters, and lab verified quantifications of major ionic concentrations, trace element concentrations, nutrient concentrations, and radiological data. The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a subset of the VDEQ GWCHEM database which is a flat-file geodatabase containing groundwater sample information from groundwater wells and springs throughout Virginia. Sample information has been correlated via DEQ Well # and projected using coordinates in VDEQ_Spring_SITES database. The GWCHEM database is comprised of historic groundwater sample data originally archived in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data warehouse. Archived STORET data originated as groundwater sample data collected and uploaded by Virginia State Water Control Board Personnel. While groundwater sample data in the STORET data warehouse are static, new groundwater sample data are periodically uploaded to NWIS and spring laboratory WQ data reflect NWIS downloaded on 9/30/2019. Recent groundwater sample data collected by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) personnel as part of the Ambient Groundwater Sampling Program are entered into the database as lab results are made available by the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS). When possible, charge balances were calculated for samples with reported values for major ions including (at a minimum) calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate. Reported values for Nitrate as N, carbonate, and fluoride were included in the charge balance calculation when available. Field determined values for bicarbonate and carbonate were used in the charge balance calculation when available. For much of the legacy DEQ groundwater sample data, bicarbonate values were derived from lab reported values of alkalinity (as mg/CaCO3) under the assumption that there was no contribution by carbonate to the reported alkalinity value. Charge balance values are reported in the "Charge Balance" column of the GWCHEM geodatabase. The closer the charge balance value is to unity (1), the lower the assumed charge balance error.In order to preserve the numerical capabilities of the database, non- numeric lab qualifiers were given the following numeric identifiers:- (minus sign) = less than the concentration specified to the right of the sign-11110 = estimated-22220 = presence verified but not quantified-33330 = radchem non-detect, below sslc-4440 = analyzed for but not detected-55550 = greater than the concentration to the right of the zero-66660 = sample held beyond normal holding time-77770 = quality control failure. Data not valid.-88880 = sample held beyond normal holding time. Sample analyzed for but not detected. Value stored is limit of detection for proces in use.-11120 = Value reported is less than the criteria of detection.-9999 = no data (parameter not quantified)

    A more in depth descprition and hydrogeologic analysis of the database can be found here
    An in Depth data fact sheet can be found here
  10. The Global ETL Tools market is Growing at Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)...

    • cognitivemarketresearch.com
    pdf,excel,csv,ppt
    Updated Dec 29, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cognitive Market Research (2023). The Global ETL Tools market is Growing at Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8.00% from 2023 to 2030. [Dataset]. https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/etl-tools-market-report
    Explore at:
    pdf,excel,csv,pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 29, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Cognitive Market Research
    License

    https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2021 - 2033
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    According to Cognitive Market Research, The Global ETL Tools market will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.00% from 2023 to 2030.

    The demand for ETL tools market is rising due to the rising demand for data-focused decision-making and the increasing popularity of self-service analytics.
    Demand for enterprise remains higher in the ETL tools market.
    The cloud deployment category held the highest ETL tools market revenue share in 2023.
    North America will continue to lead, whereas the Asia Pacific ETL tools market will experience the strongest growth until 2030.
    

    Accelerated Digital Transformation Initiatives to Provide Viable Market Output

    The ETL Tools market is the rapid acceleration of digital transformation initiatives across industries. Businesses are increasingly recognizing the importance of data-driven decision-making processes. ETL tools play a pivotal role in this transformation by efficiently extracting data from various sources, transforming it into a usable format, and loading it into data warehouses or analytical systems. With the proliferation of online platforms, IoT devices, and social media, the volume of data generated has surged.

    In 2021, Microsoft launched Azure Purview, a novel data governance service hosted on the cloud. This service provides a unified and comprehensive approach for locating, overseeing, and charting all data within an enterprise.

    ETL tools empower organizations to harness this immense data, enabling sophisticated analytics, business intelligence, and predictive modeling. This driver is crucial as companies strive to gain a competitive edge by leveraging their data assets effectively, driving the demand for advanced ETL tools that can handle diverse data sources and complex transformations.

    Increasing Focus on Data Quality and Governance to Propel Market Growth
    

    The ETL Tools market is the growing emphasis on data quality and governance. As data becomes central to strategic decision-making, ensuring its accuracy, consistency, and security has become paramount. ETL tools not only facilitate seamless data integration but also offer functionalities for data cleansing, validation, and enrichment. Organizations, particularly in highly regulated sectors like finance and healthcare, are increasingly investing in ETL solutions that enforce data governance policies and adhere to compliance requirements. Ensuring data quality from its origin to its consumption is vital for reliable analytics, regulatory compliance, and maintaining customer trust. The rising awareness about data governance’s impact on business outcomes is propelling the adoption of ETL tools equipped with robust data quality features, driving market growth in this direction.

    Rising Adoption of Cloud Based Technologies in ETL, Fuels the Market Growth
    

    Market Dynamics of the ETL Tools

    Complex Implementation Challenges to Hinder Market Growth
    

    The ETL Tools market is the complexity associated with implementation and integration processes. ETL tools often need to work seamlessly with existing databases, data warehouses, and various applications within an organization's IT ecosystem. Integrating these tools while ensuring data consistency, security, and minimal disruption to existing operations can be intricate and time-consuming. Organizations face challenges in aligning ETL tools with their specific business requirements, leading to prolonged implementation timelines. Additionally, complexities arise when dealing with large volumes of diverse data formats and sources. These implementation challenges can result in increased costs, delayed project timelines, and sometimes, suboptimal utilization of the ETL tools, hindering the market’s growth potential.

    Impact of COVID–19 on the ETL Tools Market

    The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) Tools Market, reshaping the landscape of data management and analytics. With remote work becoming the norm, businesses accelerated their digital transformation initiatives, increasing the demand for ETL tools to manage and analyze vast datasets dispersed across various locations. Companies, especially in sectors like healthcare, e-commerce, and finance, relied heavily on ETL tools to process real-time data related to the pandemic's impact, enabling agile decision-making. However, the market also faced challenges, such as delays in project implementa...

  11. Graph Database Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, South America,...

    • technavio.com
    Updated Jul 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2024). Graph Database Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, South America, Middle East and Africa - US, China, UK, Germany, France - Size and Forecast 2024-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/graph-database-market-analysis
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2021 - 2025
    Area covered
    Global, United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Graph Database Market Size 2024-2028

    The graph database market size is forecast to increase by USD 11.81 billion at a CAGR of 24.4% between 2023 and 2028.

    The graph database market is experiencing rapid growth, fueled by the increasing importance of understanding complex data relationships. Drivers include the rise of open knowledge networks, enabling sophisticated data analytics and the growing demand for real-time insights through low-latency query processing. Businesses across diverse sectors are leveraging graph databases to enhance customer relationship management, detect fraud, personalize recommendations, and gain competitive advantage. However, the lack of industry standards and the need for specialized expertise present challenges to broader adoption. Despite these hurdles, the market's future remains bright. As organizations increasingly rely on data-driven decision-making and seek to unlock the potential hidden within interconnected data, the graph database market is poised for continued expansion. This report explores key trends, challenges, and opportunities within this dynamic landscape.
    

    What will be the Size of the Graph Database Market During the Forecast Period?

    Request Free Sample

    The market has experienced significant growth in recent years, driven by the increasing demand for advanced data management solutions in various industries. Graph databases, which utilize the property graph model to represent data as interconnected entities or vertices and relationships or edges, offer unique advantages for handling complex, interconnected data. This model is particularly well-suited for applications in social networks, recommendation engines, and business processes that require real-time analytics and visualization. Despite their benefits, graph databases face challenges such as a lack of standardization and the need for specialized skills for programming and managing these databases. However, their ease of use and ability to handle long tasks, stored procedures, and indexes make them an attractive option for industries such as finance, logistics, medical information, and disease surveillance.
    Graph databases are deployed in both on-premises data centers and cloud regions, providing flexibility for businesses with varying IT infrastructures. Applications of graph databases include route optimization, warehouse management, and logistics management, making them essential tools for logistics professionals.
    

    How is this Graph Database Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

    The graph database industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

    End-user
    
      Large enterprises
      SMEs
    
    
    Type
    
      RDF
      LPG
    
    
    Solution
    
      Graph Extension
      Graph Processing Engines
      Native Graph Database
      Knowledge Graph Engines
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
    
    
      Europe
    
        Germany
        UK
        France
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
    
    
      South America
    
    
    
      Middle East and Africa
    

    By End-user Insights

    The large enterprises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.
    

    Graph databases have gained significant traction among large enterprises due to their ability to effectively model and analyze complex, interconnected data. Unlike traditional relational databases, graph databases naturally represent relationships between data entities, facilitating more efficient querying and analysis. This is particularly beneficial for businesses seeking real-time insights, such as customer behavior analysis, personalized marketing, and fraud detection. Graph databases enable fast data processing and offer advanced analytics tools, making them an ideal choice for industries like finance, logistics, and healthcare.

    However, the lack of standardization and technical expertise required for graph database implementation can pose challenges. Popular graph database technologies include Cypher and Gremlin, based on the Property Graph model, which utilizes vertices, edges, labels, and indexes for data representation. Integration with recommendation engines, social networks, and data management solutions is essential for maximizing the value of graph databases. Cloud deployments in various data centers and regions provide flexibility and scalability. Despite these advantages, data silos and hoarding remain prevalent issues, necessitating data integration solutions for enterprise data unification.

    Get a glance at the Graph Database Industry report of share of various segments Request Free Sample

    The Large enterprises segment was valued at USD 2.2 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

    Regional Analysis

    North America is estimated to contribute 34% to the growth of the global mar
    
  12. VDEQ Spring SITES

    • opendata.winchesterva.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    Updated Aug 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Virginia State Data (2023). VDEQ Spring SITES [Dataset]. https://opendata.winchesterva.gov/dataset/vdeq-spring-sites
    Explore at:
    kml, gpkg, zip, html, txt, arcgis geoservices rest api, xlsx, geojson, csv, gdbAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Virginia Department of Environmental Qualityhttps://deq.virginia.gov/
    Authors
    Virginia State Data
    Description
    The VDEQ Spring SITES database contains data describing the geographic locations and site attributes of natural springs throughout the commonwealth. This data coverage continues to evolve and contains only spring locations known to exist with a reasonable degree of certainty on the date of publication. The dataset does not replace site specific inventorying or receptor surveys but can be used as a starting point. VDEQ's initial geospatial dataset of approximately 325 springs was formed in 2008 by digitizing historical spring information sheets created by State Water Control Board geologists in the 1970s through early 1990s. Additional data has been consolidated from the EPA STORET database, the U.S. Geological Survey's Ground Water Site Inventory (GWSI) and Geographic Names Inventory System (GNIS), the Virginia Department of Health SDWIS database, the Virginia DEQ Virginia Water Use Data Set (VWUDS), the Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Water Resources and Power Bulletin No. 1: "Springs of Virginia" by Collins et al., 1930 as well as several VDWR&P Surface Water Supply bulletins from the 1940's - 1950's. A 1992 Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries / Virginia Tech sponsored study by Helfrich et al. titled "Evaluation of the Natural Springs of Virginia: Fisheries Management Implications", a 2004 Rockbridge County groundwater resources report written by Frits van der Leeden, and several smaller datasets from consultants and citizens were evaluated and added to the database when confidence in locational accuracy was high or could be verified with aerial or LIDAR imagery. Significant contributions have been made throughout the years by VDEQ Groundwater Characterization staff site visits as well as other geologists working in the region including: Matt Heller at Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources (VDMME), Wil Orndorff at the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Karst Program (VDCR), and David Nelms and Dan Doctor of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Substantial effort has been made to improve locational accuracy and remove duplication present between data sources. Hundreds of spring locations that were originally obtained using topographic maps or unknown methods were updated to sub-meter locational accuracy using post-processed differential GPS (PPGPS) and through the use of several generations of aerial imagery (2002-2017) obtained from Virginia's Geographic Information Network (VGIN) and 1-meter LIDAR, where available. Scores of new spring locations were also obtained by systematic quadrangle by quadrangle analysis in areas of the Shenandoah Valley where 1-meter LIDAR datasets where obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey. Future improvements to the dataset will result when statewide 1-meter LIDAR datasets becomes available and through continued field work by DEQ staff and other contributors working in the region. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to correct mistakes or to contribute to the database.

    The VDEQ Spring FIELD MEASUREMENTS database contains data describing field derived physio-chemical properties of spring discharges measured throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. Field visits compiled in this dataset were performed from 1928 to 2019 by geologists with the State Water Control Board, the Virginia Division of Water and Power, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Geological Survey with contributions from other sources as noted. Values of -9999 indicate that measurements were not performed for the referenced parameter. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to add data to the database or correct errors.


    The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a geodatabase containing groundwater sample information collected from springs throughout Virginia. Sample specific information include: location and site information, measured field parameters, and lab verified quantifications of major ionic concentrations, trace element concentrations, nutrient concentrations, and radiological data. The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a subset of the VDEQ GWCHEM database which is a flat-file geodatabase containing groundwater sample information from groundwater wells and springs throughout Virginia. Sample information has been correlated via DEQ Well # and projected using coordinates in VDEQ_Spring_SITES database. The GWCHEM database is comprised of historic groundwater sample data originally archived in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data warehouse. Archived STORET data originated as groundwater sample data collected and uploaded by Virginia State Water Control Board Personnel. While groundwater sample data in the STORET data warehouse are static, new groundwater sample data are periodically uploaded to NWIS and spring laboratory WQ data reflect NWIS downloaded on 9/30/2019. Recent groundwater sample data collected by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) personnel as part of the Ambient Groundwater Sampling Program are entered into the database as lab results are made available by the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS). When possible, charge balances were calculated for samples with reported values for major ions including (at a minimum) calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate. Reported values for Nitrate as N, carbonate, and fluoride were included in the charge balance calculation when available. Field determined values for bicarbonate and carbonate were used in the charge balance calculation when available. For much of the legacy DEQ groundwater sample data, bicarbonate values were derived from lab reported values of alkalinity (as mg/CaCO3) under the assumption that there was no contribution by carbonate to the reported alkalinity value. Charge balance values are reported in the "Charge Balance" column of the GWCHEM geodatabase. The closer the charge balance value is to unity (1), the lower the assumed charge balance error.In order to preserve the numerical capabilities of the database, non- numeric lab qualifiers were given the following numeric identifiers:- (minus sign) = less than the concentration specified to the right of the sign-11110 = estimated-22220 = presence verified but not quantified-33330 = radchem non-detect, below sslc-4440 = analyzed for but not detected-55550 = greater than the concentration to the right of the zero-66660 = sample held beyond normal holding time-77770 = quality control failure. Data not valid.-88880 = sample held beyond normal holding time. Sample analyzed for but not detected. Value stored is limit of detection for proces in use.-11120 = Value reported is less than the criteria of detection.-9999 = no data (parameter not quantified)

    A more in depth descprition and hydrogeologic analysis of the database can be found here
    An in Depth data fact sheet can be found here
  13. US Enterprise Data Management Market For BFSI Sector - Size and Forecast...

    • technavio.com
    Updated Nov 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2024). US Enterprise Data Management Market For BFSI Sector - Size and Forecast 2024-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/enterprise-data-management-market-for-bfsi-sector-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2021 - 2025
    Area covered
    USA
    Description

    Snapshot img

    US Enterprise Data Management Market Size 2024-2028

    The US enterprise data management market size is forecast to increase by USD 5.59 billion at a CAGR of 13.6% between 2023 and 2028.

    The market, including Enterprise Data Management (EDM) software, is experiencing significant growth due to increasing demand for data integration and visual analytics. The BFSI industry's reliance on data warehousing and data security continues to drive market expansion. Technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning are revolutionizing EDM solutions, offering enhanced capabilities for data processing and analysis. However, the high cost of implementing these advanced EDM solutions remains a challenge for some organizations. Additionally, data security concerns and the need for regulatory compliance are ongoing challenges that require continuous attention and investment. In the telecom sector, the trend towards digital transformation and the generation of vast amounts of data are fueling the demand for strong EDM solutions. Overall, the EDM software market is expected to continue its growth trajectory, driven by these market trends and challenges.
    

    What will be the size of the US Enterprise Data Management Market during the forecast period?

    Request Free Sample

    The Enterprise Data Management (EDM) market in the BFSI sector is experiencing significant growth due to the industry's expansion and strict regulations. With the increasing volume, velocity, and complexity of data, IT organizations in banks and other financial institutions are prioritizing EDM solutions to handle massive datasets and ensure information accuracy. These systems enable data synchronization, address validation, and single-source reporting, addressing data conflicts and silos that hinder effective business operations. EDM solutions are essential for both internal applications and external communication, allowing for leveraging analytics to gain a competitive edge. In the BFSI sector, where risk control is paramount, EDM plays a crucial role in managing and consuming datasets efficiently.
    The market is characterized by a competitive environment, with IT investments focused on multiuser functionality and Big Data capabilities to meet the diverse needs of various business verticals, including manufacturing and services industries. Overall, EDM is a strategic imperative for businesses seeking to stay competitive and compliant in today's data-driven economy.
    

    How is this market segmented and which is the largest segment?

    The market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

    Deployment
    
      On-premises
      Cloud
    
    
    Ownership
    
      Large enterprise
      Small and medium enterprise
    
    
    End-user
    
      Commercial banks
      Savings institutions
    
    
    Geography
    
      US
    

    By Deployment Insights

    The on-premises segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. The BFSI sector in the US is witnessing a significant expansion in the enterprise data management market, driven by strict regulations and the competitive environment. Large organizations, including commercial banks, insurance companies, and non-banking financial institutions, are prioritizing data management to ensure information accuracy and risk control. Enterprise Data Management (EDM) solutions are crucial for internal applications and external communication, enabling data synchronization and business operations. Leveraging analytics, IT organizations manage vast datasets and datasets' consumption, addressing data conflicts and ensuring data quality for reporting. EDM encompasses handling massive data through Business Analytics, ETL tools, data pipelines, and data warehouses, as well as data visualization tools.
    

    Get a glance at the market share of various segments Request Free Sample

    The on-premises segment was valued at USD 2.9 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

    Market Dynamics

    Our researchers analyzed the data with 2023 as the base year, along with the key drivers, trends, and challenges. A holistic analysis of drivers will help companies refine their marketing strategies to gain a competitive advantage.

    What are the key market drivers leading to the rise in adoption of US Enterprise Data Management Market?

    Growing demand for data integration and visual analytics is the key driver of the market. In the BFSI sector, strict regulations necessitate the effective management of large volumes of structured and unstructured data. The industry's expansion and competitive environment necessitate the need for advanced data management solutions. Enterprises are leveraging Enterprise Data Management (EDM) systems to address the challenges of data synchronization, internal
    
  14. Virginia Springs/Groundwater Layers - 2023

    • opendata.winchesterva.gov
    Updated Oct 23, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Virginia State Data (2024). Virginia Springs/Groundwater Layers - 2023 [Dataset]. https://opendata.winchesterva.gov/dataset/virginia-springs-groundwater-layers-2023
    Explore at:
    html, arcgis geoservices rest apiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 23, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Virginia Department of Environmental Qualityhttps://deq.virginia.gov/
    Authors
    Virginia State Data
    Area covered
    Hot Springs
    Description
    The VDEQ Spring SITES database contains data describing the geographic locations and site attributes of natural springs throughout the commonwealth. This data coverage continues to evolve and contains only spring locations known to exist with a reasonable degree of certainty on the date of publication. The dataset does not replace site specific inventorying or receptor surveys but can be used as a starting point. VDEQ's initial geospatial dataset of approximately 325 springs was formed in 2008 by digitizing historical spring information sheets created by State Water Control Board geologists in the 1970s through early 1990s. Additional data has been consolidated from the EPA STORET database, the U.S. Geological Survey's Ground Water Site Inventory (GWSI) and Geographic Names Inventory System (GNIS), the Virginia Department of Health SDWIS database, the Virginia DEQ Virginia Water Use Data Set (VWUDS), the Commonwealth of Virginia Division of Water Resources and Power Bulletin No. 1: "Springs of Virginia" by Collins et al., 1930 as well as several VDWR&P Surface Water Supply bulletins from the 1940's - 1950's. A 1992 Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries / Virginia Tech sponsored study by Helfrich et al. titled "Evaluation of the Natural Springs of Virginia: Fisheries Management Implications", a 2004 Rockbridge County groundwater resources report written by Frits van der Leeden, and several smaller datasets from consultants and citizens were evaluated and added to the database when confidence in locational accuracy was high or could be verified with aerial or LIDAR imagery. Significant contributions have been made throughout the years by VDEQ Groundwater Characterization staff site visits as well as other geologists working in the region including: Matt Heller at Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources (VDMME), Wil Orndorff at the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Karst Program (VDCR), and David Nelms and Dan Doctor of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Substantial effort has been made to improve locational accuracy and remove duplication present between data sources. Hundreds of spring locations that were originally obtained using topographic maps or unknown methods were updated to sub-meter locational accuracy using post-processed differential GPS (PPGPS) and through the use of several generations of aerial imagery (2002-2017) obtained from Virginia's Geographic Information Network (VGIN) and 1-meter LIDAR, where available. Scores of new spring locations were also obtained by systematic quadrangle by quadrangle analysis in areas of the Shenandoah Valley where 1-meter LIDAR datasets where obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey. Future improvements to the dataset will result when statewide 1-meter LIDAR datasets becomes available and through continued field work by DEQ staff and other contributors working in the region. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to correct mistakes or to contribute to the database.

    The VDEQ Spring FIELD MEASUREMENTS database contains data describing field derived physio-chemical properties of spring discharges measured throughout the Commonwealth of Virginia. Field visits compiled in this dataset were performed from 1928 to 2019 by geologists with the State Water Control Board, the Virginia Division of Water and Power, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the U.S. Geological Survey with contributions from other sources as noted. Values of -9999 indicate that measurements were not performed for the referenced parameter. Please do not hesitate to contact the author to add data to the database or correct errors.


    The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a geodatabase containing groundwater sample information collected from springs throughout Virginia. Sample specific information include: location and site information, measured field parameters, and lab verified quantifications of major ionic concentrations, trace element concentrations, nutrient concentrations, and radiological data. The VDEQ_Spring_WQ database is a subset of the VDEQ GWCHEM database which is a flat-file geodatabase containing groundwater sample information from groundwater wells and springs throughout Virginia. Sample information has been correlated via DEQ Well # and projected using coordinates in VDEQ_Spring_SITES database. The GWCHEM database is comprised of historic groundwater sample data originally archived in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Water Information System (NWIS) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storage and Retrieval (STORET) data warehouse. Archived STORET data originated as groundwater sample data collected and uploaded by Virginia State Water Control Board Personnel. While groundwater sample data in the STORET data warehouse are static, new groundwater sample data are periodically uploaded to NWIS and spring laboratory WQ data reflect NWIS downloaded on 9/30/2019. Recent groundwater sample data collected by Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) personnel as part of the Ambient Groundwater Sampling Program are entered into the database as lab results are made available by the Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services (DCLS). When possible, charge balances were calculated for samples with reported values for major ions including (at a minimum) calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bicarbonate, chloride, and sulfate. Reported values for Nitrate as N, carbonate, and fluoride were included in the charge balance calculation when available. Field determined values for bicarbonate and carbonate were used in the charge balance calculation when available. For much of the legacy DEQ groundwater sample data, bicarbonate values were derived from lab reported values of alkalinity (as mg/CaCO3) under the assumption that there was no contribution by carbonate to the reported alkalinity value. Charge balance values are reported in the "Charge Balance" column of the GWCHEM geodatabase. The closer the charge balance value is to unity (1), the lower the assumed charge balance error.In order to preserve the numerical capabilities of the database, non- numeric lab qualifiers were given the following numeric identifiers:- (minus sign) = less than the concentration specified to the right of the sign-11110 = estimated-22220 = presence verified but not quantified-33330 = radchem non-detect, below sslc-4440 = analyzed for but not detected-55550 = greater than the concentration to the right of the zero-66660 = sample held beyond normal holding time-77770 = quality control failure. Data not valid.-88880 = sample held beyond normal holding time. Sample analyzed for but not detected. Value stored is limit of detection for proces in use.-11120 = Value reported is less than the criteria of detection.-9999 = no data (parameter not quantified)

    A more in depth descprition and hydrogeologic analysis of the database can be found here
    An in Depth data fact sheet can be found here
  15. Transport and Logistics Data | B2B Contact Data for Global Logistics Sector...

    • datarade.ai
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Success.ai, Transport and Logistics Data | B2B Contact Data for Global Logistics Sector | Verified Profiles with Operational Insights | Best Price Guaranteed [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/transport-and-logistics-data-b2b-contact-data-for-global-lo-success-ai
    Explore at:
    .bin, .json, .xml, .csv, .xls, .sql, .txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset provided by
    Area covered
    Marshall Islands, Greenland, Guam, Germany, Sint Eustatius and Saba, Algeria, Swaziland, Mali, Austria, Saint Helena
    Description

    Success.ai’s Transport and Logistics Data provides comprehensive, verified B2B contact and company information tailored for the global logistics sector. Drawing from a database of over 170 million verified professional profiles and 30 million company profiles, this dataset delivers accurate contact details, firmographic insights, and operational data on logistics service providers, freight forwarders, trucking companies, 3PLs, and supply chain management firms worldwide. Whether you’re targeting key decision-makers for partnerships, offering freight optimization technology, or conducting market research, Success.ai ensures your outreach and strategic planning are anchored in reliable, continuously updated, and AI-validated data.

    Why Choose Success.ai’s Transport and Logistics Data?

    1. Comprehensive Contact Information

      • Access verified work emails, direct phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles of logistics leaders, operations managers, procurement officers, and supply chain directors.
      • AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy, allowing confident communication and reducing wasted outreach efforts.
    2. Global Reach Across the Logistics Sector

      • Includes profiles from freight carriers, warehousing solutions, customs brokers, freight forwarders, and last-mile delivery companies.
      • Covers regions including North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East, giving you a panoramic view of logistics networks worldwide.
    3. Continuously Updated Datasets

      • Real-time updates ensure your data remains current, reflecting changes in leadership, service offerings, and operational expansions in the rapidly evolving logistics industry.
    4. Ethical and Compliant

      • Adheres to GDPR, CCPA, and other global data privacy regulations, guaranteeing that your outreach and data usage align with legal and ethical standards.

    Data Highlights:

    • 170M+ Verified Professional Profiles: Connect with logistics professionals, key decision-makers, and operational leaders.
    • 50M Work Emails: AI-validated for seamless communication with minimized bounce rates.
    • 30M Company Profiles: In-depth firmographic and operational insights on logistics companies worldwide.
    • 700M Global Professional Profiles: Enriched datasets to support competitive analysis, market entry strategies, and global expansion.

    Key Features of the Dataset:

    1. Logistics Decision-Maker Profiles

      • Identify and connect with CEOs, COOs, logistics managers, route planners, and procurement specialists influencing transportation strategies, warehousing decisions, and supply chain optimization.
    2. Operational Firmographics and Insights

      • Access data on fleet size, service areas, warehouse locations, technology adoption, and shipping volumes to refine targeting and tailor your value propositions.
      • Utilize detailed operational insights to understand capacity constraints, specialization areas, and strategic priorities.
    3. Advanced Filters for Precision Targeting

      • Filter contacts by mode of transportation (road, rail, air, sea), geographic coverage, company size, or industry specialization.
      • Align campaigns with unique market conditions, regulatory environments, and customer demands.
    4. AI-Driven Enrichment

      • Profiles are enriched with actionable data, enabling personalized messaging, highlighting value-add solutions, and improving engagement outcomes with logistics stakeholders.

    Strategic Use Cases:

    1. Sales and Business Development

      • Engage with freight forwarders, trucking companies, and 3PL executives to present transportation management systems, visibility tools, or cost-reduction strategies.
      • Build relationships with leaders who control capacity planning, vendor selection, and route optimization.
    2. Market Research and Competitive Analysis

      • Gain insights into emerging logistics hubs, evolving supply chain models, and technology adoption rates.
      • Benchmark against industry leaders to inform product innovation, pricing strategies, and market entry plans.
    3. Partnership and Network Building

      • Identify potential partners for intermodal solutions, joint ventures, or collaborative warehousing arrangements.
      • Target logistics professionals interested in sustainability initiatives, e-commerce integrations, and cross-border trade solutions.
    4. Recruitment and Talent Acquisition

      • Find HR professionals and operations managers seeking qualified drivers, dispatchers, warehouse staff, and logistics analysts.
      • Offer recruitment services or training programs to companies aiming to enhance operational efficiency and workforce quality.

    Why Choose Success.ai?

    1. Best Price Guarantee

      • Access top-quality verified data at competitive prices, ensuring maximum ROI for your outreach and expansion efforts in the logistics sector.
    2. Seamless Integration

      • Integrate verified contact an...
  16. FOI 25544 - Datasets - Open Data Portal

    • opendata.nhsbsa.net
    Updated Jul 18, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    opendata.nhsbsa.net (2022). FOI 25544 - Datasets - Open Data Portal [Dataset]. https://opendata.nhsbsa.net/dataset/foi-25544
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 18, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    NHS Business Services Authority
    Description

    The data source was the NHSBSA Information Services Data Warehouse. Exclusions The Data excludes: • Items not dispensed, disallowed and those returned to the contractor for further clarification. • Prescriptions prescribed and dispensed in Prisons, Hospitals and Private prescriptions. • Items prescribed but not presented for dispensing or not submitted to NHS Prescription Services by the dispenser. Please note data for drugs flagged in our database as Schedule 2 and 3 controlled drugs have been excluded from this dataset for physical security reasons to prevent the identification of organisations with high levels of controlled drug dispensing. This may mean that the data in this FOI may differ from the published data in the report above, for example summing NIC for the time period may differ due to the excluded controlled drugs. The time period covered is for April 2022. Prescribing limited to prescribing organisations in England marked as hospitals (this matches the published data in the above link). No limitations on dispensing organisation No limits on prescribed products Items

  17. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Technavio (2002). Enterprise Data Warehouse (Edw) Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, Middle East and Africa, South America - US, China, UK, India, Germany - Size and Forecast 2024-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/enterprise-data-warehouse-market-industry-analysis
Organization logo

Enterprise Data Warehouse (Edw) Market Analysis North America, Europe, APAC, Middle East and Africa, South America - US, China, UK, India, Germany - Size and Forecast 2024-2028

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Oct 1, 2002
Dataset provided by
TechNavio
Authors
Technavio
Time period covered
2021 - 2025
Area covered
Global, United States
Description

Snapshot img

Enterprise Data Warehouse Market Size 2024-2028

The enterprise data warehouse market size is forecast to increase by USD 39.24 billion, at a CAGR of 30.08% between 2023 and 2028. The market is experiencing significant growth due to the data explosion across various industries. With the increasing volume, velocity, and variety of data, businesses are investing heavily in EDW solutions and data warehousing to gain insights and make informed decisions. A key growth driver is the spotlight on innovative solution launches, designed with cutting-edge features and functionalities to keep pace with the ever-evolving demands of modern businesses.

However, concerns related to data security continue to pose a challenge in the market. With the increasing amount of sensitive data being stored in EDWs, ensuring its security has become a top priority for organizations. Despite these challenges, the market is expected to grow at a strong pace, driven by the need for efficient data management and analysis.

What will be the Size of the Enterprise Data Warehouse Market During the Forecast Period?

To learn more about the EDW market report, Request Free Sample

An enterprise data warehouse (EDW) is a centralized, large-scale database designed to collect, store, and manage an organization's valuable business information from multiple sources. The EDW acts as the 'brain' of an organization, processing and integrating data from various physical recordings, flat files, and real-time data sources. Data engineering plays a crucial role in the EDW, responsible for data ingestion, cleaning, and digital transformation. Business units across the organization rely on Business Intelligence (BI) tools like Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, and data visualization tools to extract insights from the EDW. The EDW is a collection of databases, including Teradata, Netezza, Exadata, Amazon Redshift, and Google BigQuery, which serve as the backbone for data-driven decision-making.

Moreover, the cloud has significantly impacted the EDW market, enabling cost-effective and scalable solutions for businesses of all sizes. BI tools and data visualization tools enable departments to access and analyze data, improving operational efficiency and driving innovation. The EDW market continues to grow, with organizations recognizing the importance of a centralized, integrated data platform for managing their valuable assets.

Enterprise Data Warehouse Market Segmentation

The enterprise data warehouse market research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD Billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018 - 2022 for the following segments.

Product Type

  Information and analytical processing
  Data mining


Deployment

  Cloud based
  On-premises


Geography

  North America

    US


  Europe

    Germany
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India


  Middle East and Africa



  South America

By Product Type

The information and analytical processing segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. The market is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing data requirements of various industries such as IT, BFSI, education, healthcare, and retail. The primary function of an EDW system is to extract, transform, and load data from source systems into a central repository for data integration and analysis. This process enables businesses to gain timely insights and make informed decisions based on historical data and real-time analytics. EDW systems are designed to be scalable to cater to the data processing needs of the largest organizations. The use of Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) and Extract, Load, Transform (ELT) processes in data warehousing has become a popular trend to address processing bottlenecks and ensure Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are met.

Furthermore, business users increasingly rely on these systems for business intelligence and data analytics. Big Data technologies like Hadoop MapReduce and Apache Spark are being integrated with ETL tools to enable the processing of large volumes of data. Precisely, as a pioneer in data integration, offers solutions that cater to the needs of various business teams and departments. Data visualization tools like Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Teradata, Netezza, Exadata, Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery, Snowflake, and Data virtualization are being used to gain insights from the data in the EDW. The history of transactions and multiple users accessing the data make the need for data warehousing more critical than ever.

Get a glance at the market share of various segments. Request Free Sample

The information and analytical processing segment was valued at USD 3.65 billion in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Regional Insights

APAC is estimated to contribute 32% to the growt

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu