Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
I have spent some time scrapping and shaping PubChem data into a Neo4j graph database. The process took a lot of time, mainly downloading, and loading it into Neo4j. The whole process took weeks. If you want to build your own I will show you how to download mine and set it up in less than an hour (most of the time you’ll just have to wait). The process of how this dataset is created is described in the following blogs: - https://medium.com/@nijhof.dns/exploring-neodash-for-197m-chemical-full-text-graph-e3baed9615b8 - https://medium.com/neo4j/combining-3-biochemical-datasets-in-a-graph-database-8e9aafbb5788 - https://medium.com/p/d9ee9779dfbe
The full database is a merge of 3 datasets, PubChem (compounds + synonyms), NCI60 (GI50), and ChEMBL (cell lines). It contains 6 nodes of interest: ● Compound: This is related to a compound of PubChem. It has 1 property. ○ pubChemCompId: The id within pubchem. So “compound:cid162366967” links to https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/162366967. This number can be used with both PubChem RDF and PUG. ● Synonym: A name found in the literature. This name can refer to zero, one, or more compounds. This helps find relations between natural language names and absolute compounds they are related to. ○ Name: Natural language name. Can contain letters, spaces, numbers, and any other Unicode character. ○ pubChemSynId: PubChem synonym id as used within the RDF ● CellLine: These are the ChEMBL cell lines. They hold a lot of information. ○ Name: The name of the cell line. ○ Uri: A unique URI for every element within the ChEMBL RDF. ○ cellosaurusId: The id to connect it to the Cellosaurus dataset. This is one of the most extensive cell line datasets out there. ● Measurement: A measurement you can do within a biomedical experiment. Currently, only GI50 (the concentration needed for Growth Inhibition of 50%) is added. ○ Name: Name of the measurement. ● Condition: A single condition of an experiment. A condition is part of an experiment. Examples are: an individual of the control group, a sample with drug A, or a sample with more CO2 ● Experiment: A collection of multiple conditions all done at the same time with the same bias. Meaning we assume all uncontrolled variables are the same. ○ Name: Name of experiment.
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F442733%2F7dd804811e105390dfe20bb5cd1a68c0%2FUntitled%20graph.png?generation=1680113457794452&alt=media" alt="">
How do download it Warning, you need 120 GB of free memory. The compressed file you download is already 30 GB. The uncompressed file is 30 GB. The database afterward is 60 GB. 60 GB is only for temporary files, the other 60 is for the database. If you do this on an HDD hard disk it will be slow.
If you load this into Neo4j desktop as a local database (like I do) it will scream and yell at you, just ignore this. We are pushing it far further than it is designed for, but it will still work.
Go to this Kaggle dataset and download the dump file. Unzip the file, then delete the zipped file. This part needs 60 GB but only takes 30 by the end of it.
Create a database
Open the Neo4j desktop app, and click “Reveal files in File Explorer”. Move the .dump you downloaded into this folder.
Click on the ... behind the .dump file and click Create new DBMS from dump. This database is a dump from Neo4j V4, so your database also needs to be V4.x.x!
It will now create the database. This will take a long time, it might even say it has timed out. Do not believe this lie! In the background, it is still running. Every time you start it, it will time out. Just let it run and press start later again. The second time it will be started up directly.
Every time I start it up I get the timed-out error. After waiting 10 minutes and clicking start again the database, and with it, more than 200 million nodes, is ready. And you are done! Good luck and let me know what you build with it
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
Graph Database Market Size 2025-2029
The graph database market size is valued to increase by USD 11.24 billion, at a CAGR of 29% from 2024 to 2029. Open knowledge network gaining popularity will drive the graph database market.
Market Insights
North America dominated the market and accounted for a 46% growth during the 2025-2029.
By End-user - Large enterprises segment was valued at USD 1.51 billion in 2023
By Type - RDF segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
Market Size & Forecast
Market Opportunities: USD 670.01 million
Market Future Opportunities 2024: USD 11235.10 million
CAGR from 2024 to 2029 : 29%
Market Summary
The market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing demand for low-latency query capabilities and the ability to handle complex, interconnected data. Graph databases are deployed in both on-premises data centers and cloud regions, providing flexibility for businesses with varying IT infrastructures. One real-world business scenario where graph databases excel is in supply chain optimization. In this context, graph databases can help identify the shortest path between suppliers and consumers, taking into account various factors such as inventory levels, transportation routes, and demand patterns. This can lead to increased operational efficiency and reduced costs.
However, the market faces challenges such as the lack of standardization and programming flexibility. Graph databases, while powerful, require specialized skills to implement and manage effectively. Additionally, the market is still evolving, with new players and technologies emerging regularly. Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of graph databases make them an attractive option for businesses seeking to gain a competitive edge through improved data management and analysis.
What will be the size of the Graph Database Market during the forecast period?
Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample
The market is an evolving landscape, with businesses increasingly recognizing the value of graph technology for managing complex and interconnected data. According to recent research, the adoption of graph databases is projected to grow by over 20% annually, surpassing traditional relational databases in certain use cases. This trend is particularly significant for industries requiring advanced data analysis, such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. Compliance is a key decision area where graph databases offer a competitive edge. By modeling data as nodes and relationships, organizations can easily trace and analyze interconnected data, ensuring regulatory requirements are met. Moreover, graph databases enable real-time insights, which is crucial for budgeting and product strategy in today's fast-paced business environment.
Graph databases also provide superior performance compared to traditional databases, especially in handling complex queries involving relationships and connections. This translates to significant time and cost savings, making it an attractive option for businesses seeking to optimize their data management infrastructure. In conclusion, the market is experiencing robust growth, driven by its ability to handle complex data relationships and offer real-time insights. This trend is particularly relevant for industries dealing with regulatory compliance and seeking to optimize their data management infrastructure.
Unpacking the Graph Database Market Landscape
In today's data-driven business landscape, the adoption of graph databases has surged due to their unique capabilities in handling complex network data modeling. Compared to traditional relational databases, graph databases offer a significant improvement in query performance for intricate relationship queries, with some reports suggesting up to a 500% increase in query response time. Furthermore, graph databases enable efficient data lineage tracking, ensuring regulatory compliance and enhancing data version control. Graph databases, such as property graph models and RDF databases, facilitate node relationship management and real-time graph processing, making them indispensable for industries like finance, healthcare, and social media. With the rise of distributed and knowledge graph databases, organizations can achieve scalability and performance improvements, handling massive datasets with ease. Security, indexing, and deployment are essential aspects of graph databases, ensuring data integrity and availability. Query performance tuning and graph analytics libraries further enhance the value of graph databases in data integration and business intelligence applications. Ultimately, graph databases offer a powerful alternative to NoSQL databases, providing a more flexible and efficient approach to managing complex data relationships.
Key Market Drivers Fueling Growth
The growing popularity o
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is the dataset used for paper: "A Recommender System of Buggy App Checkers for App Store Moderators", published on the International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft) in 2015.
Dataset Collection We built a dataset that consists of a random sample of Android app metadata and user reviews available on the Google Play Store on January and March 2014. Since the Google Play Store is continuously evolving (adding, removing and/or updating apps), we updated the dataset twice. The dataset D1 contains available apps in the Google Play Store in January 2014. Then, we created a new snapshot (D2) of the Google Play Store in March 2014.
The apps belong to the 27 different categories defined by Google (at the time of writing the paper), and the 4 predefined subcategories (free, paid, new_free, and new_paid). For each category-subcategory pair (e.g. tools-free, tools-paid, sports-new_free, etc.), we collected a maximum of 500 samples, resulting in a median number of 1.978 apps per category.
For each app, we retrieved the following metadata: name, package, creator, version code, version name, number of downloads, size, upload date, star rating, star counting, and the set of permission requests.
In addition, for each app, we collected up to a maximum of the latest 500 reviews posted by users in the Google Play Store. For each review, we retrieved its metadata: title, description, device, and version of the app. None of these fields were mandatory, thus several reviews lack some of these details. From all the reviews attached to an app, we only considered the reviews associated with the latest version of the app —i.e., we discarded unversioned and old-versioned reviews. Thus, resulting in a corpus of 1,402,717 reviews (2014 Jan.).
Dataset Stats Some stats about the datasets:
D1 (Jan. 2014) contains 38,781 apps requesting 7,826 different permissions, and 1,402,717 user reviews.
D2 (Mar. 2014) contains 46,644 apps and 9,319 different permission requests, and 1,361,319 user reviews.
Additional stats about the datasets are available here.
Dataset Description To store the dataset, we created a graph database with Neo4j. This dataset therefore consists of a graph describing the apps as nodes and edges. We chose a graph database because the graph visualization helps to identify connections among data (e.g., clusters of apps sharing similar sets of permission requests).
In particular, our dataset graph contains six types of nodes: - APP nodes containing metadata of each app, - PERMISSION nodes describing permission types, - CATEGORY nodes describing app categories, - SUBCATEGORY nodes describing app subcategories, - USER_REVIEW nodes storing user reviews. - TOPIC topics mined from user reviews (using LDA).
Furthermore, there are five types of relationships between APP nodes and each of the remaining nodes:
Dataset Files Info
Neo4j 2.0 Databases
googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_2_0.rar
googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_2_0.rar We provide two Neo4j databases containing the 2 snapshots of the Google Play Store (January and March 2014). These are the original databases created for the paper. The databases were created with Neo4j 2.0. In particular with the tool version 'Neo4j 2.0.0-M06 Community Edition' (latest version available at the time of implementing the paper in 2014).
Neo4j 3.5 Databases
googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar
googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar Currently, the version Neo4j 2.0 is deprecated and it is not available for download in the official Neo4j Download Center. We have migrated the original databases (Neo4j 2.0) to Neo4j 3.5.28. The databases can be opened with the tool version: 'Neo4j Community Edition 3.5.28'. The tool can be downloaded from the official Neo4j Donwload page.
In order to open the databases with more recent versions of Neo4j, the databases must be first migrated to the corresponding version. Instructions about the migration process can be found in the Neo4j Migration Guide.
First time the Neo4j database is connected, it could request credentials. The username and pasword are: neo4j/neo4j
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Graph Database market size was USD 7.3 billion in 2024 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.2% from 2024 to 2031. Market Dynamics of Graph Database Market
Key Drivers for Graph Database Market
Increasing demand for solutions with the capability to process low-latency queries-One of the main reasons the Graph Database market is extensively being used all over the globe, to the extent that numerous legacy database providers are endeavoring to assimilate graph database schemas into their main relational database infrastructures. Whereas, in theory, the strategy might save money, it might degrade and slow down the performance of queries run beside the database. A graph database is altering traditional brick-and-mortar trades into digital business powerhouses in terms of digital business activities.
Growing usage of graph database technology to drive the Graph Database market's expansion in the years ahead.
Key Restraints for Graph Database Market
Complex programming and standardization pose a serious threat to the Graph Database industry.
The market also faces significant difficulties related to low-cost clusters.
Introduction of the Graph Database Market
The graph database market has experienced significant growth due to the increasing need for efficient data management and complex relationship mapping in various industries. Unlike traditional relational databases, graph databases excel in handling interconnected data, making them ideal for applications such as social networks, fraud detection, recommendation engines, and supply chain management. Key drivers of this market include the rising adoption of big data analytics, advancements in artificial intelligence, and the proliferation of connected devices. Leading players, such as Neo4j, Amazon Web Services, and Microsoft, continue to innovate, offering scalable and robust graph database solutions. The growing demand for real-time, low-latency data processing capabilities further propels the market's expansion.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Distance-2 coloring.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.emergenresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.emergenresearch.com/privacy-policy
The global Graph Database market size reached USD 1.59 Billion in 2020 and revenue is forecasted to reach USD 11.25 Billion in 2030 registering a CAGR of 21.9%. Graph Database (GDB) industry report classifies global market by share, trend, growth and on the basis of component, deployment, graph type...
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is based on the model developed with the Ph.D. students of the Communication and Information Sciences Ph.D. program at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, intended to help new students get relevant information. The model was first presented at the iConference 2023, in a paper "Community Design of a Knowledge Graph to Support Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Students " by Stanislava Gardasevic and Rich Gazan (available at: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/9eebcea7-06fd-4db3-b420-347883e6379e/content)The database is created in Neo4J, and the .dump file can be imported to the cloud instance of this software. The dataset (.dump) contains publically available data collected from multiple web locations and indexes of the sample of publications from the people in this domain. Except for that, it contains my (first author's) personal graph demonstrating progress through a student's program in this degree, and activities they have done while in the program. This dataset was made possible with the huge help of my collaborator, Petar Popovic, who ingested the data in the database.The model and dataset were developed while involving the end users in the design and are based on the actual information needs of a population. It is intended to allow researchers to investigate multigraph visualization of the data modeled by the said model.The knowledge graph was evaluated with CIS student population, and the study results show that it is very helpful for decision-making, information discovery, and identification of people in one's surroundings who might be good collaborators or information points. We provide the .json file containing the Neo4J Bloom perspective with styling and queries used in these evaluation sessions.
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global Graph Database Vector Search market size reached USD 2.35 billion in 2024, exhibiting robust growth driven by the increasing demand for advanced data analytics and AI-powered search capabilities. The market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 21.7% during the forecast period, propelling the market size to an anticipated USD 16.8 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth trajectory is primarily fueled by the proliferation of big data, the widespread adoption of AI and machine learning, and the growing necessity for real-time, context-aware search solutions across diverse industry verticals.
One of the primary growth factors for the Graph Database Vector Search market is the exponential increase in unstructured and semi-structured data generated by enterprises worldwide. Organizations are increasingly seeking efficient ways to extract meaningful insights from complex datasets, and graph databases paired with vector search capabilities are emerging as the preferred solution. These technologies enable organizations to model intricate relationships and perform semantic searches with unprecedented speed and accuracy. Additionally, the integration of AI and machine learning algorithms with graph databases is enhancing their ability to deliver context-rich, relevant results, thereby improving decision-making processes and business outcomes.
Another significant driver is the rising adoption of recommendation systems and fraud detection solutions across various sectors, particularly in BFSI, retail, and e-commerce. Graph database vector search platforms excel at identifying patterns, anomalies, and connections that traditional relational databases often miss. This capability is crucial for detecting fraudulent activities, building sophisticated recommendation engines, and powering knowledge graphs that underpin intelligent digital experiences. The growing need for personalized customer engagement and proactive risk mitigation is prompting organizations to invest heavily in these advanced technologies, further accelerating market growth.
Furthermore, the shift towards cloud-based deployment models is catalyzing the adoption of graph database vector search solutions. Cloud platforms offer scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, making it easier for organizations of all sizes to implement and scale graph-powered applications. The availability of managed services and API-driven architectures is reducing the complexity associated with deployment and maintenance, enabling faster time-to-value. As more enterprises migrate their data infrastructure to the cloud, the demand for cloud-native graph database vector search solutions is expected to surge, driving sustained market expansion.
Geographically, North America currently dominates the Graph Database Vector Search market, owing to its advanced IT infrastructure, high adoption rate of AI-driven technologies, and presence of leading technology vendors. However, rapid digital transformation initiatives across Europe and the Asia Pacific are positioning these regions as high-growth markets. The increasing focus on data-driven decision-making, coupled with supportive regulatory frameworks and government investments in AI and big data analytics, is expected to fuel robust growth in these regions over the forecast period.
The Component segment of the Graph Database Vector Search market is broadly categorized into software and services. The software sub-segment commands the largest share, driven by the relentless innovation in graph database technologies and the integration of advanced vector search functionalities. Organizations are increasingly deploying graph database software to manage complex data relationships, power semantic search, and enhance the performance of AI and machine learning applications. The software market is characterized by the proliferation of both open-source and proprietary solutions, with vendors
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The ARG Database is a huge collection of labeled and unlabeled graphs realized by the MIVIA Group. The aim of this collection is to provide the graph research community with a standard test ground for the benchmarking of graph matching algorithms.
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global graph database platform market size reached USD 2.5 billion in 2024, demonstrating robust demand across various sectors. The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 22.7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching an estimated value of USD 19.1 billion by 2033. This impressive growth is primarily attributed to the increasing need for advanced data analytics, real-time intelligence, and the proliferation of connected data across enterprises worldwide.
A key factor propelling the growth of the graph database platform market is the surging adoption of big data analytics and artificial intelligence in business operations. As organizations manage ever-growing volumes of complex and connected data, traditional relational databases often fall short in terms of efficiency and scalability. Graph database platforms offer a more intuitive and efficient way to model, store, and query highly connected data, enabling faster insights and supporting sophisticated applications such as fraud detection, recommendation engines, and social network analysis. The need for real-time analytics and decision-making is driving enterprises to invest heavily in graph database technologies, further accelerating market expansion.
Another significant driver for the graph database platform market is the increasing incidence of cyber threats and fraudulent activities, especially within the BFSI and e-commerce sectors. Graph databases excel at uncovering hidden patterns, relationships, and anomalies within vast datasets, making them invaluable for fraud detection and risk management. Financial institutions are leveraging these platforms to identify suspicious transactions and prevent financial crimes, while retailers use them to optimize customer experience and personalize recommendations. The versatility of graph databases in supporting diverse use cases across multiple industry verticals is a major contributor to their rising adoption and market growth.
The rapid digital transformation of enterprises, coupled with the shift towards cloud-based solutions, is also fueling the graph database platform market. Cloud deployment offers scalability, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, allowing organizations to seamlessly integrate graph databases into their existing IT infrastructure. The growing prevalence of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and the emergence of Industry 4.0 have further increased the demand for platforms capable of handling complex, interconnected data. As businesses strive for agility and innovation, graph database platforms are becoming a strategic asset for gaining competitive advantage.
From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the graph database platform market, driven by the presence of leading technology providers, early adoption of advanced analytics, and substantial investments in digital infrastructure. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, fueled by rapid economic development, expanding IT sectors, and increasing awareness of data-driven decision-making. Europe also holds a significant market share, supported by strong regulatory frameworks and widespread digital transformation initiatives. The market landscape is highly dynamic, with regional trends influenced by technological advancements, regulatory policies, and industry-specific demands.
The graph database platform market is segmented by component into software and services. The software segment holds the largest share, as organizations increasingly deploy advanced graph database solutions to manage and analyze complex data relationships. These software platforms provide robust features such as data modeling, visualization, and high-performance querying, enabling users to derive actionable insights from connected data. Vendors are continuously enhancing their offerings with AI and machine learning capabilities, making graph database software indispensable for modern data-driven enterprises.
</p&g
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
Graph Database Market size was valued at USD 2.86 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 14.58 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 22.6% from 2026 to 2032. Global Graph Database Market DriversThe growth and development of the Graph Database Market is attributed to certain main market drivers. These factors have a big impact on how Graph Database are demanded and adopted in different sectors. Several of the major market forces are as follows:Growth of Connected Data: Graph databases are excellent at expressing and querying relationships as businesses work with datasets that are more complex and interconnected. Graph databases are becoming more and more in demand as connected data gains significance across multiple industries.Knowledge Graph Emergence: In fields like artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics, knowledge graphs—which arrange information in a graph structure—are becoming more and more popular. Knowledge graphs can only be created and queried via graph databases, which is what is causing their widespread use.Analytics and Machine Learning Advancements: Graph databases handle relationships and patterns in data effectively, enabling applications related to advanced analytics and machine learning. Graph databases are becoming more and more in demand when combined with analytics and machine learning as businesses want to extract more insights from their data.Real-Time Data Processing: Graph databases can process data in real-time, which makes them appropriate for applications that need quick answers and insights. In situations like fraud detection, recommendation systems, and network analysis, this is especially helpful.Increasing Need for Security and Fraud Detection: Graph databases are useful for fraud security and detection applications because they can identify patterns and abnormalities in linked data. The growing need for graph databases in security solutions is a result of the ongoing evolution of cybersecurity threats.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
daily updated ERC database for seasonal ERC graphs
averaged ERC value for 14 PSA based on the historical and today's value
We wouldn't be here without the help of others. If you owe any attributions or thanks, include them here along with any citations of past research.
Your data will be in front of the world's largest data science community. What questions do you want to see answered?
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Description of data sets.
Facebook
Twitter
As per our latest research, the global Graph Database for Security market size is valued at USD 1.7 billion in 2024, with robust growth driven by increasing cybersecurity threats and the need for advanced data analytics. The market is exhibiting a strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22.4% from 2025 to 2033. By 2033, the market is forecasted to reach an impressive USD 11.1 billion. This growth is primarily attributed to the rapid adoption of graph database technologies in security applications, the rising complexity of cyberattacks, and the demand for real-time threat detection and response capabilities in organizations worldwide.
One of the most significant growth factors for the Graph Database for Security market is the escalating sophistication and frequency of cyber threats across industries. Traditional relational databases often fall short in mapping complex relationships and detecting hidden patterns within vast datasets. Graph databases, on the other hand, offer a flexible and highly efficient way to analyze interconnected data, making them invaluable for security applications such as threat intelligence and fraud detection. Organizations are increasingly leveraging graph technology to uncover previously undetectable attack vectors, trace the origins of security breaches, and proactively mitigate risks. The ability to visualize and traverse relationships in real time has become a critical asset, particularly as threat actors employ more advanced and coordinated tactics.
Another key driver is the surge in digital transformation initiatives and the proliferation of connected devices, which have expanded the attack surface for enterprises. As businesses migrate to cloud environments and adopt hybrid IT infrastructures, the complexity of managing security increases exponentially. Graph databases enable security teams to monitor user behavior, access patterns, and network relationships more effectively, supporting advanced use cases such as identity and access management (IAM) and risk and compliance management. The integration of AI and machine learning with graph databases further enhances their analytical capabilities, empowering organizations to automate anomaly detection and streamline incident response processes. This technological synergy is fostering rapid market adoption, especially among sectors with stringent regulatory requirements.
The growing regulatory landscape and compliance mandates are also propelling the demand for graph database solutions in security. Regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA require organizations to maintain comprehensive audit trails, ensure data privacy, and demonstrate robust security controls. Graph databases provide a transparent and auditable framework for tracking data lineage, access permissions, and policy enforcement across complex IT ecosystems. This capability not only helps organizations achieve compliance but also strengthens their overall security posture. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, companies are prioritizing investments in advanced analytics platforms that can deliver both operational efficiency and compliance assurance.
From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the Graph Database for Security market due to its early adoption of advanced cybersecurity technologies and the presence of major technology providers. The region’s strong emphasis on innovation, coupled with high cybersecurity spending, positions it as a key growth engine for the market. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, driven by rapid digitalization, increasing cyber threats, and government-led cybersecurity initiatives. Europe also holds a significant market share, supported by strict data protection regulations and a mature IT infrastructure. Collectively, these regional dynamics are shaping the global landscape and fueling sustained market expansion.
The Component segment of the Graph Databa
Facebook
Twitterhttps://opensource.org/licenses/CPAL-1.0https://opensource.org/licenses/CPAL-1.0
This initial release contains all simple connected graphs of order n<=10, and a collection of integer invariants. Up to order n<=6, there is a collection of "special" invariants that are stored in a custom table (see main project for details).
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The Knowledge Graph Technology market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing need for enhanced data interoperability, improved data analysis capabilities, and the rising adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) across various industries. The market's expansion is fueled by the advantages of knowledge graphs in improving decision-making processes, streamlining operations, and fostering innovation. Specific applications, such as semantic search, personalized recommendations, and fraud detection, are witnessing significant traction. While precise market size figures are unavailable, a conservative estimate places the 2025 market value at $5 billion, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25% projected through 2033. This growth trajectory is supported by the escalating demand for efficient data management solutions in sectors like healthcare, finance, and retail, where knowledge graphs can significantly enhance operational efficiency and strategic decision-making. Technological advancements, particularly in graph database technologies and semantic web technologies, further bolster market expansion. However, the market faces challenges such as the complexity of knowledge graph implementation, the need for specialized expertise, and data integration issues across disparate sources. Despite these challenges, the long-term outlook for knowledge graph technology remains positive, driven by continuous technological innovations and the growing recognition of its transformative potential across diverse sectors. The segmentation of the Knowledge Graph Technology market reveals significant opportunities within various application areas and technology types. Application-wise, semantic search and recommendation engines are currently leading the market, while emerging applications in areas such as risk management and supply chain optimization are poised for rapid growth in the coming years. In terms of technology types, ontology engineering and graph databases are experiencing high demand. Regionally, North America and Europe currently dominate the market due to early adoption and established technological infrastructure. However, the Asia-Pacific region is projected to witness significant growth, spurred by increasing digitalization and investments in AI and ML initiatives. Competitive landscape analysis reveals a mix of established technology providers and emerging startups, creating a dynamic and competitive ecosystem. The continuous evolution of technologies and the expansion into new applications will continue to shape the market's growth and trajectory over the forecast period.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
Knowledge Graph Market size was valued at USD 7.19 Billion in 2024 and is expected to reach USD 4.1 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 18.1% from 2025 to 2032.
Knowledge Graph Market Drivers
Enhanced Data Integration and Analysis: Knowledge graphs excel at integrating and analyzing data from diverse sources, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. This enables organizations to gain a holistic view of information and make more informed decisions. Improved Search and Information Retrieval: Knowledge graphs provide a more semantic understanding of information, enabling more accurate and relevant search results. Instead of just keyword matching, knowledge graphs understand the relationships between entities and provide more contextually relevant information. Personalized Experiences: Knowledge graphs can be used to personalize user experiences by understanding individual preferences, interests, and behaviors. This is crucial for applications like personalized recommendations, targeted advertising, and customer service. AI and Machine Learning: Knowledge graphs are essential for powering AI and machine learning applications, such as chatbots, recommendation systems, and fraud detection. They provide a structured representation of knowledge that AI/ML models can easily understand and utilize. Business Intelligence and Decision Making: Knowledge graphs can help businesses gain deeper insights into their customers, markets, and operations. They can be used to identify trends, predict future outcomes, and make more informed business decisions.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://choosealicense.com/licenses/cdla-permissive-2.0/https://choosealicense.com/licenses/cdla-permissive-2.0/
Graphs extracted from public datasets. Suitable for populating graph databases and powering GraphRAG.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
According to our latest research, the global service topology graph database market size reached USD 1.42 billion in 2024, demonstrating robust momentum with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.8%. The market is expected to achieve a value of USD 10.62 billion by 2033. This impressive growth is primarily driven by the increasing demand for advanced data management solutions, the proliferation of complex IT infrastructures, and the rising necessity for real-time analytics and visualization across diverse industries. The market’s rapid expansion is further bolstered by technological advancements in graph database architectures and the growing adoption of cloud-based deployment models.
One of the most significant growth factors in the service topology graph database market is the escalating complexity of modern IT environments. As organizations transition toward hybrid and multi-cloud infrastructures, the need for solutions that can accurately map and manage intricate service relationships has become paramount. Graph databases excel at representing highly interconnected data, making them ideal for modeling service topologies. This capability enables enterprises to visualize dependencies, identify bottlenecks, and optimize resource allocation, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and minimizing downtime. Additionally, the growing integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with graph databases allows for predictive analytics and automated anomaly detection, further fueling market growth.
Another key driver is the surge in demand for enhanced network management and security. With the increasing frequency and sophistication of cyber threats, organizations are seeking comprehensive solutions to monitor and secure their networks. Service topology graph databases provide unparalleled visibility into network structures, enabling proactive identification of vulnerabilities and facilitating rapid incident response. These databases support real-time monitoring and compliance tracking, which are critical for industries with stringent regulatory requirements such as BFSI and healthcare. The ability to correlate data from multiple sources and uncover hidden patterns is proving invaluable for security teams, making graph databases an essential component of modern cybersecurity strategies.
The expanding adoption of digital transformation initiatives across various sectors also contributes to the market’s growth. Enterprises are leveraging service topology graph databases to streamline asset management, optimize IT operations, and improve customer experiences. In the retail sector, for example, these databases help map customer journeys and personalize interactions by analyzing relationships between products, users, and transactions. In manufacturing, they facilitate predictive maintenance and supply chain optimization by modeling equipment dependencies and process flows. As organizations continue to prioritize data-driven decision-making, the demand for graph-based solutions is expected to rise significantly, further propelling the market forward.
From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the global market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024. This dominance is attributed to the presence of major technology vendors, early adoption of advanced IT solutions, and significant investments in research and development. Europe follows closely, driven by stringent data privacy regulations and the need for efficient compliance management. The Asia Pacific region is witnessing the fastest growth, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing investments in cloud computing. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also experiencing steady growth, supported by government initiatives to modernize public services and enhance cybersecurity capabilities.
The component segment of the service topology graph database market is bifurcated into software and services, each playing a pivotal role in driving overall market expansion. The software sub-segment dominates the market, owing to the continuous evolution of graph database platforms that offer enhanced scalability, flexibility, and integration capabilities. Modern graph database software solutions are equipped with advanced visualization tools, intuitive user interfaces, and robust APIs, enabling seamless in
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.imarcgroup.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.imarcgroup.com/privacy-policy
United States graph database market size reached USD 537.9 Million in 2024. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach USD 2,754.7 Million by 2033, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 19.7% during 2025-2033. The widespread adoption of this innovative approach, as it offers numerous advantages over traditional database solutions in terms of computing power, storage, indexing, querying, etc., is primarily driving the market growth across the country.
|
Report Attribute
|
Key Statistics
|
|---|---|
|
Base Year
| 2024 |
|
Forecast Years
|
2025-2033
|
|
Historical Years
| 2019-2024 |
| Market Size in 2024 | USD 537.9 Million |
| Market Forecast in 2033 | USD 2,754.7 Million |
| Market Growth Rate (2025-233) | 19.7% |
IMARC Group provides an analysis of the key trends in each segment of the market, along with forecasts at the country level for 2025-2033. Our report has categorized the market based on component, type of database, analysis type, deployment model, application, and industry vertical.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
I have spent some time scrapping and shaping PubChem data into a Neo4j graph database. The process took a lot of time, mainly downloading, and loading it into Neo4j. The whole process took weeks. If you want to build your own I will show you how to download mine and set it up in less than an hour (most of the time you’ll just have to wait). The process of how this dataset is created is described in the following blogs: - https://medium.com/@nijhof.dns/exploring-neodash-for-197m-chemical-full-text-graph-e3baed9615b8 - https://medium.com/neo4j/combining-3-biochemical-datasets-in-a-graph-database-8e9aafbb5788 - https://medium.com/p/d9ee9779dfbe
The full database is a merge of 3 datasets, PubChem (compounds + synonyms), NCI60 (GI50), and ChEMBL (cell lines). It contains 6 nodes of interest: ● Compound: This is related to a compound of PubChem. It has 1 property. ○ pubChemCompId: The id within pubchem. So “compound:cid162366967” links to https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/162366967. This number can be used with both PubChem RDF and PUG. ● Synonym: A name found in the literature. This name can refer to zero, one, or more compounds. This helps find relations between natural language names and absolute compounds they are related to. ○ Name: Natural language name. Can contain letters, spaces, numbers, and any other Unicode character. ○ pubChemSynId: PubChem synonym id as used within the RDF ● CellLine: These are the ChEMBL cell lines. They hold a lot of information. ○ Name: The name of the cell line. ○ Uri: A unique URI for every element within the ChEMBL RDF. ○ cellosaurusId: The id to connect it to the Cellosaurus dataset. This is one of the most extensive cell line datasets out there. ● Measurement: A measurement you can do within a biomedical experiment. Currently, only GI50 (the concentration needed for Growth Inhibition of 50%) is added. ○ Name: Name of the measurement. ● Condition: A single condition of an experiment. A condition is part of an experiment. Examples are: an individual of the control group, a sample with drug A, or a sample with more CO2 ● Experiment: A collection of multiple conditions all done at the same time with the same bias. Meaning we assume all uncontrolled variables are the same. ○ Name: Name of experiment.
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F442733%2F7dd804811e105390dfe20bb5cd1a68c0%2FUntitled%20graph.png?generation=1680113457794452&alt=media" alt="">
How do download it Warning, you need 120 GB of free memory. The compressed file you download is already 30 GB. The uncompressed file is 30 GB. The database afterward is 60 GB. 60 GB is only for temporary files, the other 60 is for the database. If you do this on an HDD hard disk it will be slow.
If you load this into Neo4j desktop as a local database (like I do) it will scream and yell at you, just ignore this. We are pushing it far further than it is designed for, but it will still work.
Go to this Kaggle dataset and download the dump file. Unzip the file, then delete the zipped file. This part needs 60 GB but only takes 30 by the end of it.
Create a database
Open the Neo4j desktop app, and click “Reveal files in File Explorer”. Move the .dump you downloaded into this folder.
Click on the ... behind the .dump file and click Create new DBMS from dump. This database is a dump from Neo4j V4, so your database also needs to be V4.x.x!
It will now create the database. This will take a long time, it might even say it has timed out. Do not believe this lie! In the background, it is still running. Every time you start it, it will time out. Just let it run and press start later again. The second time it will be started up directly.
Every time I start it up I get the timed-out error. After waiting 10 minutes and clicking start again the database, and with it, more than 200 million nodes, is ready. And you are done! Good luck and let me know what you build with it