ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
For up to date data starting in 2018, please go to the new dataset at: https://data.sfgov.org/d/wg3w-h783
As of May 2018, the feed from the legacy mainframe CABLE was discontinued. It was extremely prone to issues and caused many delays in data accessibility. The new dataset linked above comes from the Crime Data Warehouse, a more reliable data system maintained by the Police Department.
This data will undergo a minor update to conform more closely to the schema of the new dataset. We will post a change notice when that work is planned. This change will not include adding new fields or backfilling data. It is provided as is. We are keeping data from the two systems separate to make it transparent to data users that there were fundamental changes.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
As of July 19, 2015, the PD District boundaries have been updated through a redistricting process. These new boundaries are not reflected in the dataset yet so you cannot compare data from July 19, 2015 onward to official reports from PD with the Police District column. We are working on an update to the dataset to reflect the updated boundaries starting with data entered July 19 onward.
Incidents derived from SFPD Crime Incident Reporting system Updated daily, showing data from 1/1/2003 up until two weeks ago from current date. Please note: San Francisco police have implemented a new system for tracking crime. The dataset included here is still coming from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process). Data included here is no longer the official SFPD data. We will migrate to the new system for DataSF in the upcoming months.
Violent and property crime rates per 100,000 population for San Mateo County and the State of California. The total crimes used to calculate the rates for San Mateo County include data from: Sheriff's Department Unincorporated, Atherton, Belmont, Brisbane, Broadmoor, Burlingame, Colma, Daly City, East Palo Alto, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Hillsborough, Menlo Park, Millbrae, Pacifica, Redwood City, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San Francisco, Bay Area DPR, BART, Union Pacific Railroad, and CA Highway Patrol.
https://cubig.ai/store/terms-of-servicehttps://cubig.ai/store/terms-of-service
1) Data introduction • San-francisco-crime dataset provides nearly 12 years of crime reports across San Francisco, from Sunset to SOMA and Marina to Excelsior.
2) Data utilization (1) San-francisco-crime data has characteristics that: • Data range is from January 1, 2003 to May 13, 2015. The goal is to predict and visualize crime categories based on 9 variables such as date, category, and description. (2) San-francisco-crime data can be used to: • Public Safety and Policing: Law enforcement agencies can use this data to enhance public safety by identifying crime hot spots, optimizing patrol routes, and allocating resources more effectively. • Urban Planning: By analyzing crime patterns, urban planners and policy makers can make informed decisions about urban development, zoning, and community services to improve safety and quality of life.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
A. SUMMARY Read the detailed overview of this dataset.
This dataset includes incident reports that have been filed as of January 1, 2018. These reports are filed by officers or self-reported by members of the public using SFPD’s online reporting system. The reports are categorized into the following groups based on how the report was received and the type of incident:
Initial Reports: the first report filed for an incident Coplogic Reports: incident reports filed by members of the public using SFPD’s online reporting system Vehicle Reports: any incident reports related to stolen and/or recovered vehicles
Disclaimer: The San Francisco Police Department does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correct sequencing of the information as the data is subject to change as modifications and updates are completed.
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED Data is added to open data once incident reports have been reviewed and approved by a supervising Sergeant or Lieutenant. Incident reports may be removed from the dataset if in compliance with court orders to seal records or for administrative purposes such as active internal affair investigations and/or criminal investigations.
C. UPDATE PROCESS Updated automatically daily by 10:00 Pacific
D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET Read more about how to appropriately use identifiers, interpret different kinds of records, and limitations of analysis related to active privacy controls.
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
DataSF seeks to transform the way that the City of San Francisco works -- through the use of data.
This dataset contains the following tables: ['311_service_requests', 'bikeshare_stations', 'bikeshare_status', 'bikeshare_trips', 'film_locations', 'sffd_service_calls', 'sfpd_incidents', 'street_trees']
This dataset is deprecated and not being updated.
Fork this kernel to get started with this dataset.
Dataset Source: SF OpenData. This dataset is publicly available for anyone to use under the following terms provided by the Dataset Source - http://sfgov.org/ - and is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied, from Google. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.
Banner Photo by @meric from Unplash.
Which neighborhoods have the highest proportion of offensive graffiti?
Which complaint is most likely to be made using Twitter and in which neighborhood?
What are the most complained about Muni stops in San Francisco?
What are the top 10 incident types that the San Francisco Fire Department responds to?
How many medical incidents and structure fires are there in each neighborhood?
What’s the average response time for each type of dispatched vehicle?
Which category of police incidents have historically been the most common in San Francisco?
What were the most common police incidents in the category of LARCENY/THEFT in 2016?
Which non-criminal incidents saw the biggest reporting change from 2015 to 2016?
What is the average tree diameter?
What is the highest number of a particular species of tree planted in a single year?
Which San Francisco locations feature the largest number of trees?
There has been little research on United States homicide rates from a long-term perspective, primarily because there has been no consistent data series on a particular place preceding the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which began its first full year in 1931. To fill this research gap, this project created a data series on homicides per capita for New York City that spans two centuries. The goal was to create a site-specific, individual-based data series that could be used to examine major social shifts related to homicide, such as mass immigration, urban growth, war, demographic changes, and changes in laws. Data were also gathered on various other sites, particularly in England, to allow for comparisons on important issues, such as the post-World War II wave of violence. The basic approach to the data collection was to obtain the best possible estimate of annual counts and the most complete information on individual homicides. The annual count data (Parts 1 and 3) were derived from multiple sources, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reports and Supplementary Homicide Reports, as well as other official counts from the New York City Police Department and the City Inspector in the early 19th century. The data include a combined count of murder and manslaughter because charge bargaining often blurs this legal distinction. The individual-level data (Part 2) were drawn from coroners' indictments held by the New York City Municipal Archives, and from daily newspapers. Duplication was avoided by keeping a record for each victim. The estimation technique known as "capture-recapture" was used to estimate homicides not listed in either source. Part 1 variables include counts of New York City homicides, arrests, and convictions, as well as the homicide rate, race or ethnicity and gender of victims, type of weapon used, and source of data. Part 2 includes the date of the murder, the age, sex, and race of the offender and victim, and whether the case led to an arrest, trial, conviction, execution, or pardon. Part 3 contains annual homicide counts and rates for various comparison sites including Liverpool, London, Kent, Canada, Baltimore, Los Angeles, Seattle, and San Francisco.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
A log of dataset alerts open, monitored or resolved on the open data portal. Alerts can include issues as well as deprecation or discontinuation notices.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
A. SUMMARY These data represent hate crimes reported by the SFPD to the California Department of Justice. Read the detailed overview of this dataset here.
What is a Hate Crime? A hate crime is a crime against a person, group, or property motivated by the victim's real or perceived protected social group. An individual may be the victim of a hate crime if they have been targeted because of their actual or perceived: (1) disability, (2) gender, (3) nationality, (4) race or ethnicity, (5) religion, (6) sexual orientation, and/or (7) association with a person or group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics. Hate crimes are serious crimes that may result in imprisonment or jail time.
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED
How is a Hate Crime Processed?
Not all prejudice incidents including the utterance of hate speech rise to the level of a hate crime. The U.S. Constitution allows hate speech if it does not interfere with the civil rights of others. While these acts are certainly hurtful, they do not rise to the level of criminal violations and thus may not be prosecuted. When a prejudice incident is reported, the reporting officer conducts a preliminary investigation and writes a crime or incident report. Bigotry must be the central motivation for an incident to be determined to be a hate crime. In that report, all facts such as verbatims or statements that occurred before or after the incident and characteristics such as the race, ethnicity, sex, religion, or sexual orientations of the victim and suspect (if known) are included. To classify a prejudice incident, the San Francisco Police Department’s Hate Crimes Unit of the Special Investigations Division conducts an analysis of the incident report to determine if the incident falls under the definition of a “hate crime” as defined by state law.
California Penal Code 422.55 - Hate Crime Definition
C. UPDATE PROCESS These data are updated monthly.
D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET This dataset includes the following information about each incident: the hate crime offense, bias type, location/time, and the number of hate crime victims and suspects. The data presented mirrors data published by the California Department of Justice, albeit at a higher frequency. The publishing of these data meet requirements set forth in PC 13023.
E. RELATED DATASETS California Department of Justice - Hate Crimes Info California Department of Justice - Hate Crimes Data
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
As of July 19, 2015, the PD District boundaries have been updated through a redistricting process. These new boundaries are not reflected in the dataset yet so you cannot compare data from July 19, 2015 onward to official reports from PD with the Police District column. We are working on an update to the dataset to reflect the updated boundaries starting with data entered July 19 onward.
Incidents derived from SFPD Crime Incident Reporting system Updated daily, showing data from 1/1/2003 up until two weeks ago from current date. Please note: San Francisco police have implemented a new system for tracking crime. The dataset included here is still coming from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process). Data included here is no longer the official SFPD data. We will migrate to the new system for DataSF in the upcoming months.
https://cubig.ai/store/terms-of-servicehttps://cubig.ai/store/terms-of-service
1) Data Introduction • The San Francisco Crime Classification Dataset is designed to classify various types of crimes reported in San Francisco. It includes detailed information such as date, category, description, day of the week, police district, resolution, and location coordinates, making it suitable for crime analysis and predictive modeling.
2) Data Utilization (1) Crime Classification data has characteristics that: • It contains detailed records of criminal activities, including the type of crime, date and time of occurrence, location, and police action taken. This allows for comprehensive analysis of crime patterns and trends in different areas of San Francisco. (2) Crime Classification data can be used to: • Law Enforcement: Assists police departments in understanding crime distribution and effectiveness of crime prevention strategies, enhancing patrol planning and resource allocation. • Urban Planning and Safety: Supports city planners and public safety officials in identifying high-crime areas, enabling the development of targeted interventions and safety measures.
This survey was conducted by the Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research at Northwestern University to gather information for two projects that analyzed the impact of crime on the lives of city dwellers. These projects were the Reactions to Crime (RTC) Project, which was supported by the United States Department of Justice's National Institute of Justice as part of its Research Agreements Program, and the Rape Project, supported by the National Center for the Prevention and Control of Rape, a subdivision of the National Institute of Mental Health. Both investigations were concerned with individual behavior and collective reactions to crime. The Rape Project was specifically concerned with sexual assault and its consequences for the lives of women. The three cities selected for study were Chicago, Philadelphia, and San Francisco. A total of ten neighborhoods were chosen from these cities along a number of dimensions -- ethnicity, class, crime, and levels of organizational activity. In addition, a small city-wide sample was drawn from each city. Reactions to crime topics covered how individuals band together to deal with crime problems, individual responses to crime such as property marking or the installation of locks and bars, and the impact of fear of crime on day-to-day behavior -- for example, shopping and recreational patterns. Respondents were asked several questions that called for self-reports of behavior, including events and conditions in their home areas, their relationship to their neighbors, who they knew and visited around their homes, and what they watched on TV and read in the newspapers. Also included were a number of questions measuring respondents' perceptions of the extent of crime in their communities, whether they knew someone who had been a victim, and what they had done to reduce their own chances of being victimized. Questions on sexual assault/rape included whether the respondent thought this was a neighborhood problem, if the number of rapes in the neighborhood were increasing or decreasing, how many women they thought had been sexually assaulted or raped in the neighborhood in the previous year, and how they felt about various rape prevention measures, such as increasing home security, women not going out alone at night, women dressing more modestly, learning self-defense techniques, carrying weapons, increasing men's respect of women, and newspapers publishing the names of known rapists. Female respondents were asked whether they thought it likely that they would be sexually assaulted in the next year, how much they feared sexual assault when going out alone after dark in the neighborhood, whether they knew a sexual assault victim, whether they had reported any sexual assaults to police, and where and when sexual assaults took place that they were aware of. Demographic information collected on respondents includes age, race, ethnicity, education, occupation, income, and whether the respondent owned or rented their home.
This data includes incidents from the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD) Crime Incident Reporting system, from January 2003 until the present (2 weeks ago from current date). The dataset is updated daily. Please note: the SFPD has implemented a new system for tracking crime. This dataset is still sourced from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process). This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .
San Francisco Police Department Crime Reporting Plots. These have historically been used for reporting various stats. Derived from shapefile sent by SFPD in May 2003.
U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
Counts of Part I committed in San Mateo County from 1985 on. This dataset also includes Part II crimes from 2013 on.
Part I crimes include: homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, motor vehicle theft, larceny-theft, and arson. These counts include crimes committed at San Francisco International Airport (SFO), Unincorporated San Mateo County, Woodside, Portola Valley, San Carlos from 10/31/10 forward; Half Moon Bay from 6/12/11 forward; and Millbrae from 3/4/12 forward.
Part II crimes do not include San Francisco International Airport (SFO) cases and is an estimate only. An estimate is required because there are no specific data types used when keying in Type II crime types. Therefore, Records Manager judgment is used.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
[Update 04/16/2018]: We are still developing the automation for the new dataset. We do not have an updated publishing date at the moment. We have a target schema and have provided a crosswalk document attached to the existing dataset in advance of the changes. We will update this document if there's new information to share.
[Change Notice 03/13/2018]: By the end of this month, this dataset will become historical and a new one will be created starting with incident data in 2018. This one will remain here, but no longer be updated. The new one will have data coming from a new system, will not have a 2 week lag, and have updated districts among other quality improvements. We will attach a guide here with more detailed change updates as soon as we have them.
+++++++++
As of July 19, 2015, the PD District boundaries have been updated through a redistricting process. These new boundaries are not reflected in the dataset yet so you cannot compare data from July 19, 2015 onward to official reports from PD with the Police District column. We are working on an update to the dataset to reflect the updated boundaries starting with data entered July 19 onward.
Incidents derived from SFPD Crime Incident Reporting system Updated daily, showing data from 1/1/2003 up until two weeks ago from current date. Please note: San Francisco police have implemented a new system for tracking crime. The dataset included here is still coming from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process). Data included here is no longer the official SFPD data.
description: [Update 04/16/2018]: We are still developing the automation for the new dataset. We do not have an updated publishing date at the moment. We have a target schema and have provided a crosswalk document attached to the existing dataset in advance of the changes. We will update this document if there's new information to share. [Change Notice 03/13/2018]: By the end of this month, this dataset will become historical and a new one will be created starting with incident data in 2018. This one will remain here, but no longer be updated. The new one will have data coming from a new system, will not have a 2 week lag, and have updated districts among other quality improvements. We will attach a guide here with more detailed change updates as soon as we have them. +++++++++ As of July 19, 2015, the PD District boundaries have been updated through a redistricting process. These new boundaries are not reflected in the dataset yet so you cannot compare data from July 19, 2015 onward to official reports from PD with the Police District column. We are working on an update to the dataset to reflect the updated boundaries starting with data entered July 19 onward. Incidents derived from SFPD Crime Incident Reporting system Updated daily, showing data from 1/1/2003 up until two weeks ago from current date. Please note: San Francisco police have implemented a new system for tracking crime. The dataset included here is still coming from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process). Data included here is no longer the official SFPD data.; abstract: [Update 04/16/2018]: We are still developing the automation for the new dataset. We do not have an updated publishing date at the moment. We have a target schema and have provided a crosswalk document attached to the existing dataset in advance of the changes. We will update this document if there's new information to share. [Change Notice 03/13/2018]: By the end of this month, this dataset will become historical and a new one will be created starting with incident data in 2018. This one will remain here, but no longer be updated. The new one will have data coming from a new system, will not have a 2 week lag, and have updated districts among other quality improvements. We will attach a guide here with more detailed change updates as soon as we have them. +++++++++ As of July 19, 2015, the PD District boundaries have been updated through a redistricting process. These new boundaries are not reflected in the dataset yet so you cannot compare data from July 19, 2015 onward to official reports from PD with the Police District column. We are working on an update to the dataset to reflect the updated boundaries starting with data entered July 19 onward. Incidents derived from SFPD Crime Incident Reporting system Updated daily, showing data from 1/1/2003 up until two weeks ago from current date. Please note: San Francisco police have implemented a new system for tracking crime. The dataset included here is still coming from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process). Data included here is no longer the official SFPD data.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
As of July 19, 2015, the PD District boundaries have been updated through a redistricting process. These new boundaries are not reflected in the dataset yet so you cannot compare data from July 19, 2015 onward to official reports from PD with the Police District column. We are working on an update to the dataset to reflect the updated boundaries starting with data entered July 19 onward.
Incidents derived from SFPD Crime Incident Reporting system Updated daily, showing data from 1/1/2003 up until two weeks ago from current date. Please note: San Francisco police have implemented a new system for tracking crime. The dataset included here is still coming from the old system, which is in the process of being retired (a multi-year process). Data included here is no longer the official SFPD data. We will migrate to the new system for DataSF in the upcoming months.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
As of November 2023, this map has been updated to use a new format. For details, please see here.
For up to date data starting in 2018, please go to the new dataset at: https://data.sfgov.org/d/wg3w-h783
As of May 2018, the feed from the legacy mainframe CABLE was discontinued. It was extremely prone to issues and caused many delays in data accessibility. The new dataset linked above comes from the Crime Data Warehouse, a more reliable data system maintained by the Police Department.
This data will undergo a minor update to conform more closely to the schema of the new dataset. We will post a change notice when that work is planned. This change will not include adding new fields or backfilling data. It is provided as is. We are keeping data from the two systems separate to make it transparent to data users that there were fundamental changes.
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
A. SUMMARY
Please note that the "Data Last Updated" date on this page denotes the most recent DataSF update and does not reflect the most recent update to this dataset. To confirm the completeness of this dataset please contact the District Attorney's office at districtattorney@sfgov.org.
This data set includes all criminal cases prosecuted by the District Attorney’s Office that have reached a final resolution, or disposition. A case is resolved when a final determination has been made in court (i.e., an acquittal, conviction, dismissal, or a judge finds a defendant has successfully completed diversion).
A case may also be resolved through other means. For example, a case may be re-indicted, a defendant may be released to another agency's custody, etc. Because of the case tracking systems used in the San Francisco Superior Court, these cases are assigned new court numbers and thus show up as distinct cases in the data available to the District Attorney’s Office. Lastly, sometimes a defendant will have multiple criminal cases related to the same incident or similar types of crimes. The defendant may plead guilty to one case, and in exchange, the other cases will be dropped. The San Francisco Superior Court codes these cases as "1385 PC - Guilty Plea to Other Charge".
More information about this dataset can be found under the “Case Resolutions” section on the Data Dashboards page
Disclaimer: The San Francisco District Attorney's Office does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information as the data is subject to change as modifications and updates are completed.
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED
When a case prosecuted by the District Attorney’s Office reaches a final resolution, or disposition, relevant data is manually entered into the District Attorney Office's case management system. Data reports are pulled from this system on a semi-regular basis, cleaned, anonymized, and added to Open Data.
C. UPDATE PROCESS
We strive to update this dataset at the beginning of every week. However, the creation of this dataset requires a manual pull from the Office's case management system and is dependent on staff availability.
D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET
Please review the “Case Resolutions” section on the Data Dashboards page for more information about this dataset.
E. Related DATASETS
District Attorney Actions Taken on Arrests Presented District Attorney Cases Prosecuted
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
For up to date data starting in 2018, please go to the new dataset at: https://data.sfgov.org/d/wg3w-h783
As of May 2018, the feed from the legacy mainframe CABLE was discontinued. It was extremely prone to issues and caused many delays in data accessibility. The new dataset linked above comes from the Crime Data Warehouse, a more reliable data system maintained by the Police Department.
This data will undergo a minor update to conform more closely to the schema of the new dataset. We will post a change notice when that work is planned. This change will not include adding new fields or backfilling data. It is provided as is. We are keeping data from the two systems separate to make it transparent to data users that there were fundamental changes.