This part of DS 781 presents data for folds for the geologic and geomorphic map of the Offshore of San Francisco map area, California. The vector data file is included in "Folds_OffshoreSanFrancisco.zip," which is accessible from https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/781/OffshoreSanFrancisco/data_catalog_OffshoreSanFrancisco.html. These data accompany the pamphlet and map sheets of Cochrane, G.R., Johnson, S.Y., Dartnell, P., Greene, H.G., Erdey, M.D., Golden, N.E., Hartwell, S.R., Endris, C.A., Manson, M.W., Sliter, R.W., Kvitek, R.G., Watt, J.T., Ross, S.L., and Bruns, T.R. (G.R. Cochrane and S.A. Cochran, eds.), 2015, California State Waters Map Series—Offshore of San Francisco, California (ver. 1.1, June 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1068, pamphlet 39 p., 10 sheets, scale 1:24,000, https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151068. Folds were primarily mapped by interpretation of seismic reflection profile data (see field activities S-15-10-NC and F-2-07-NC). The seismic reflection profiles were collected between 2007 and 2010.
Geospatial data about City of San Francisco, California Zoning Map — Height Districts. Export to CAD, GIS, PDF, CSV and access via API.
A. SUMMARY This dataset contains San Francisco Board of Supervisor district boundaries approved by the San Francisco Redistricting Task Force in April 2022 following redistricting based on the 2020 Decennial Census. B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED The dataset was created from the final map submitted by the San Francisco Redistricting Task Force. Boundaries in this map were decided using data from the 2020 Census on the number of people living in each census block in the City and County. This data includes the number of individuals incarcerated in facilities under the control of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation based on their last known residential address. This information is made available by the Statewide Database based on U.S. Census Bureau Census Redistricting Data (P.L. 94-171). These map boundaries were trimmed to align with the city and county's physical boundaries for greater usability. This trimming mainly consisted of excluding the water around the City and County from the boundaries. C. UPDATE PROCESS Supervisor District boundaries are updated every 10 years following the federal decennial census. The Supervisor District boundaries reflected in this dataset will remain unchanged. A new dataset will be created after the next decennial census and redistricting process are completed. The dataset is manually updated as new members of the Board of Supervisors take office. The most recent manual update date is reflected in the 'data_as_of' field. Once the redistricting process is completed after the next decennial census and a new dataset is published, this dataset will become static and will no longer be updated. D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET This dataset can be joined to other datasets for analysis and reporting at the Supervisor District level. If you are building an automated reporting pipeline using Socrata API access, we recommend using this dataset if you'd like your boundaries to remain static. If you would like the boundaries to automatically update after each decennial census to reflect the most recent Supervisor District boundaries, see the Current Supervisor Districts dataset or the Current Supervisor Districts (trimmed to remove water and other non-populated City territories) dataset. E. RELATED DATASETS Supervisor Districts (2012) Current Supervisor Districts Current Supervisor Districts (trimmed to remove water and non-populated areas)
This part of DS 781 presents data for faults for the geologic and geomorphic map of the Offshore San Francisco map area, California. The vector data file is included in "Faults_OffshoreSanFrancisco.zip," which is accessible from https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/781/OffshoreSanFrancisco/data_catalog_OffshoreSanFrancisco.html. These data accompany the pamphlet and map sheets of Cochrane, G.R., Johnson, S.Y., Dartnell, P., Greene, H.G., Erdey, M.D., Golden, N.E., Hartwell, S.R., Endris, C.A., Manson, M.W., Sliter, R.W., Kvitek, R.G., Watt, J.T., Ross, S.L., and Bruns, T.R. (G.R. Cochrane and S.A. Cochran, eds.), 2015, California State Waters Map Series—Offshore of San Francisco, California (ver. 1.1, June 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1068, pamphlet 39 p., 10 sheets, scale 1:24,000, https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151068. Faults in the Offshore of San Francisco map area are identified on seismic-reflection data based on abrupt truncation or warping of reflections and (or) juxtaposition of reflection panels with different seismic parameters such as reflection presence, amplitude, frequency, geometry, continuity, and vertical sequence. Faults were primarily mapped by interpretation of seismic reflection profile data (see field activities S-15-10-NC and F-2-07-NC). The seismic reflection profiles were collected between 2007 and 2010.
This digital map database provides an areally continuous representation of the Quaternary surficial deposits of the San Francisco Bay region merged from the database files from Knudsen and others (2000) and Witter and others (2006). The more detailed mapping by Witter and others (2006) of the inner part of the region (compiled at a scale of 1:24,000), is given precedence over the less detailed mapping by Knudsen and others (2000) of the outer part of the area (compiled at a scale of 1:100,000). The Quaternary map database is accompanied by a list of the map-unit names represented by polygon identities, a digital map index of the 1:24,000-scale topographic quadrangles of the region, and a figure illustrating the contents of the database. The Quaternary map database includes line work and the identity of the Quaternary map units, but no further description of the map units or how they were mapped. Use of the database should thus be accompanied by consultation with the original reports, which describe the map units and mapping procedures: citation of this database should be accompanied by citation of those original reports. As with all such digital maps, use of this database should attend to the compilation scales involved and not try to extract spatial detail or accuracy beyond those limits. Database layers: SFBQuat-lns: Quaternary map database: unit boundaries and their attributes SFBQuat-pys: Quaternary map database: polygons and their attributes SFBIndex-lns: Boundaries of 7.5-minute quadrangles for the map area, distinguishing those that form boundaries of 15-minute and 30x60-minute quadrangles SFBIndex-pys: 7.5-minute quadrangles, and for those within map area, their names and the names of the 30x60-minute quadrangles that contain them. The liquefaction ratings presented in the original reports for the various Quaternary map units remain valid and can be assigned to the units in this database if desired, with ratings of Witter and others (2006) given precedence. Assembly of the Quaternary map database involved stripping out all the information from the source maps that dealt with liquefaction, a major component of the original reports, and adjusting line work at the common boundary between the two source maps to produce a nearly seamless spatial database. The common boundary between the two sources is retained. Mismatches remaining at that common boundary are of two types: (1) contrasts in the degree of subdivision of the deposits resulting from the different compilation scales, and (2) terminations of narrow bands of water and artificial fill and levees at quadrangle boundaries that resulted from differences in details shown on the 1:24,000-scale topographic maps used as a source of mapping information in the original reports. The illustrative figure accompanying the database shows the content of the database plotted at a scale of 1:275,000, with the different map units distinguished by color and the different types of lines distinguished by symbol and color. An index map in that figure shows the 165 7½-minute quadrangles covering the region and the areas of the two source maps. Knudsen, K.L., Sowers, J.M., Witter, R.C., Wentworth, C.M., Helley, E.J., Nicholson, R.S., Wright, H.M., and Brown, K.M., 2000, Preliminary maps of Quaternary deposits and liquefaction susceptibility, nine-county San Francisco Bay region, California: a digital database: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 00-444. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/of00-444/ Witter, R.C., Knudsen, K.L, Sowers, J.M., Wentworth, C.M., Koehler, R.D., Randolph, C. E., Brooks, S.K., and Gans, K.D., 2006, Maps of Quaternary Deposits and Liquefaction Susceptibility in the Central San Francisco Bay Region, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 06-1037 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1037)
https://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
The Zoning Districts are a component of the Zoning Map which in turn is a key component of the San Francisco Planning Code. More information can be found here: https://sfplanning.org/zoning
This part of DS 781 presents data for the geologic and geomorphic map of the Offshore of San Francisco map area, California. The polygon shapefile is included in "Geology_OffshoreSanFrancisco.zip," which is accessible from https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/781/OffshoreSanFrancisco/data_catalog_OffshoreSanFrancisco.html. These data accompany the pamphlet and map sheets of Cochrane, G.R., Johnson, S.Y., Dartnell, P., Greene, H.G., Erdey, M.D., Golden, N.E., Hartwell, S.R., Endris, C.A., Manson, M.W., Sliter, R.W., Kvitek, R.G., Watt, J.T., Ross, S.L., and Bruns, T.R. (G.R. Cochrane and S.A. Cochran, eds.), 2015, California State Waters Map Series—Offshore of San Francisco, California (ver. 1.1, June 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1068, pamphlet 39 p., 10 sheets, scale 1:24,000, https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151068. Marine geology and geomorphology was mapped in the Offshore of San Francisco map area, California, from approximate Mean High Water (MHW) to the 3-nautical-mile limit of California's State Waters. Offshore geologic units were delineated on the basis of integrated analyses of adjacent onshore geology with multibeam bathymetry and backscatter imagery, seafloor-sediment and rock samples, digital camera and video imagery, and high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles.
Special Use Districts City and County of San Francisco Planning Department. The Special Use Districts are a component of the Zoning Map. The Zoning - Map comprises: - Zoning Districts - Height and Bulk Districts - Special Use Districts - Preservation Districts - Coastal Zone Area - Sprcial Sign Districts The official Zoning Map can be found in the San Francisco Planning Code: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=14145&stateId=5&stateName=California (click on the links under ZONING MAPS on the left navigation column). Sec 235 of the Planning Code states: "In addition to the use districts that are established by Section 201 of this Code, there shall also be in the City such special use districts as are established in this Section and Sections 236 through 249.5, in order to carry out further the purposes of this Code. The designations, locations and boundaries of these special use districts shall be as provided in Sections 236 through 249.5, and as shown on the Zoning Map referred to in Section 105 of this Code, subject to the provisions of Section 105. The original of the numbered sectional maps of the Zoning Map for Special Use Districts referred to in Sections 236 through 249.5 is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors under File No. 191-67-2. and No. 273.80. In any special use district the provisions of the applicable use district established by Section 201 shall prevail, except as specifically provided in Sections 236 through 249.5."
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘Zoning Map - Zoning Districts’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/28f51f62-ddc4-40c4-8e22-32de984f2745 on 13 February 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
Zoning Districts City and County of San Francisco Planning Department. The Zoning Districts are the main component of the Zoning Map. The Zoning Map comprises: - Zoning Districts - Height and Bulk Districts - Special Use Districts - Preservation Districts - Coastal Zone Area - Special Sign Districts The official Zoning Map can be found in the San Francisco Planning Code: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=14145&stateId=5&stateName=California (click on the links under ZONING MAPS on the left navigation column). Summaries of the Zoning District codes can be found here: http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=1580 Section 105 of the Planning Code states: "The designations, locations and boundaries of the districts established by this Code shall be shown upon the "Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco," which shall consist of a series of numbered sectional maps. Wherever any uncertainty exists as to the boundary of any district as shown on said sectional maps, the following rules shall apply: (a) Where boundary lines are indicated as following streets and alleys within the right-of-way, they shall be construed as following the centerlines of such streets and alleys; (b) Where boundary lines are indicated as approximately following lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be such boundaries; (c) Where a boundary line divides a lot or crosses unsubdivided property; the location of such boundary shall be as indicated upon the Zoning Map using the scale appearing on such map; (d) Where further uncertainty exists, the City Planning Commission upon written application, or on its own motion, shall by resolution determine the location of a disputed boundary giving due consideration to the apparent indicated location thereof and the scale of the Zoning Map and the express purposes of this Code; (e) Wherever any property is not under these rules specifically included in any use district shown on the Zoning Map, such property is hereby declared to be in an RH-1(D) District, except that all property owned on the effective date of this amendment by the United States of America, State of California, City and County of San Francisco, or other governmental agency and within the City and County of San Francisco but not within the area covered by Sectional Maps Nos. 1 through 13 of the Zoning Map is hereby declared to be in a P (Public Use) District unless reclassified in accordance with the provisions of this Code; (f) Wherever any property is not under these rules specifically included in any height and bulk district shown on the Zoning Map, such property is hereby declared to be in a 40-X height and bulk district, except that all property owned on the effective date of this amendment by the United States of America, State of California, City and County of San Francisco, or other governmental agency and within the City and County of San Francisco but not within the area covered by Sectional Maps Nos. 1H through 13H of the Zoning Map is hereby declared to be in an OS (Open Space) District unless reclassified in accordance with the provisions of this Code, with the exception of Yerba Buena Island and Treasure Island which are hereby declared to be in a 40-X height and bulk district."Updated quarterly.
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This web map provides the locations of Mobility Hubs in the San Francisco Bay Region as designated by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). Priority Development Areas, Transit-Oriented Communities Policy Areas, Equity Priority Communities, and Active Transportation Network are included on the map to display how Mobility Hubs relate to other planning initiatives at MTC. This web map also serves as the base map for the Mobility Hubs web map application.With transportation services and infrastructure evolving rapidly, mobility hubs present an opportunity to flexibly design and integrate a variety of sustainable transportation options to enhance connectivity across the region. Unprecedented growth, affordability challenges, the climate crisis, and changing travel behaviors resulting from the pandemic show the need to prioritize low emission transportation options that support resiliency, choice, and embrace future changes in technology.The mobility hub program is a Climate Initiative Strategy from Plan Bay Area 2050. The primary goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled. The program supports other regional and Plan Bay Area goals of increasing transit access and connectivity, focusing growth, increasing transit-oriented development and providing viable travel options to all Bay Area communities.More information on mobility hub planning at MTC can be found at https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/mobility-hubs
Neighborhood notification boundaries created by the Department of City Planning. These boundaries are designed solely for the Planning Department's neighborhood notifications where neighborhood groups are notified about certain types of developments in their area. An Excel spreadsheet of Neighborhood Groups contact details can be downloaded from this page: http://sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=1654 There are alternative neighborhood boundaries available (which include a larger number of neighborhoods) here (Mayors Office): https://data.sfgov.org/d/pty2-tcw4 and here (Realtors): https://data.sfgov.org/Geography/SF-Realtor-Neighborhoods/wwis-y924
map of all SF properties with associated, zoning, permits, complaints and appeals history See the Data Downloads section of the websites help page for links to individual DataSF datasets used to create the Property Information Map https://sfplanninggis.org/pim/help.html
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
A recent New York Times article examines one of the biggest drivers in a families' decision to leave cities: school. Using data from a number of sources, the New York Times developed charts that look at school performance and median home sale price per square foot for five metro areas including New York/New Jersey, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago, and Minneapolis.For most of the cities studied, home prices rise with the quality of the school district but a number of districts break this pattern. The map shown highlights five Bay Area schools that perform above average, and have below average housing costs.The New York Times used median price per square foot to measure housing costs and the median number of grades ahead (or behind) for school district quality. In the San Francisco Bay Region, the price per square foot was around $500 while students were .28 grades ahead of their grade placement. The five Bay Area schools that were selected had the lowest home prices and the best performing schools in the region.Source: New York Times
In 2007, the California Ocean Protection Council initiated the California Seafloor Mapping Program (CSMP), designed to create a comprehensive seafloor map of high-resolution bathymetry, marine benthic habitats, and geology within California’s State Waters. The program supports a large number of coastal-zone- and ocean-management issues, including the California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) (California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2008), which requires information about the distribution of ecosystems as part of the design and proposal process for the establishment of Marine Protected Areas. A focus of CSMP is to map California’s State Waters with consistent methods at a consistent scale. The CSMP approach is to create highly detailed seafloor maps through collection, integration, interpretation, and visualization of swath sonar data (the undersea equivalent of satellite remote-sensing data in terrestrial mapping), acoustic backscatter, seafloor video, seafloor photography, high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles, and bottom-sediment sampling data. The map products display seafloor morphology and character, identify potential marine benthic habitats, and illustrate both the surficial seafloor geology and shallow (to about 100 m) subsurface geology. It is emphasized that the more interpretive habitat and geology data rely on the integration of multiple, new high-resolution datasets and that mapping at small scales would not be possible without such data. This approach and CSMP planning is based in part on recommendations of the Marine Mapping Planning Workshop (Kvitek and others, 2006), attended by coastal and marine managers and scientists from around the state. That workshop established geographic priorities for a coastal mapping project and identified the need for coverage of “lands” from the shore strand line (defined as Mean Higher High Water; MHHW) out to the 3-nautical-mile (5.6-km) limit of California’s State Waters. Unfortunately, surveying the zone from MHHW out to 10-m water depth is not consistently possible using ship-based surveying methods, owing to sea state (for example, waves, wind, or currents), kelp coverage, and shallow rock outcrops. Accordingly, some of the data presented in this series commonly do not cover the zone from the shore out to 10-m depth. This data is part of a series of online U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) publications, each of which includes several map sheets, some explanatory text, and a descriptive pamphlet. Each map sheet is published as a PDF file. Geographic information system (GIS) files that contain both ESRI ArcGIS raster grids (for example, bathymetry, seafloor character) and geotiffs (for example, shaded relief) are also included for each publication. For those who do not own the full suite of ESRI GIS and mapping software, the data can be read using ESRI ArcReader, a free viewer that is available at http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcreader/index.html (last accessed September 20, 2013). The California Seafloor Mapping Program is a collaborative venture between numerous different federal and state agencies, academia, and the private sector. CSMP partners include the California Coastal Conservancy, the California Ocean Protection Council, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the California Geological Survey, California State University at Monterey Bay’s Seafloor Mapping Lab, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Center for Habitat Studies, Fugro Pelagos, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, including National Ocean Service–Office of Coast Surveys, National Marine Sanctuaries, and National Marine Fisheries Service), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Geological Survey. These web services for the Offshore of San Francisco map area includes data layers that are associated to GIS and map sheets available from the USGS CSMP web page at https://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/mapping/csmp/index.html. Each published CSMP map area includes a data catalog of geographic information system (GIS) files; map sheets that contain explanatory text; and an associated descriptive pamphlet. This web service represents the available data layers for this map area. Data was combined from different sonar surveys to generate a comprehensive high-resolution bathymetry and acoustic-backscatter coverage of the map area. These data reveal a range of physiographic including exposed bedrock outcrops, large fields of sand waves, as well as many human impacts on the seafloor. To validate geological and biological interpretations of the sonar data, the U.S. Geological Survey towed a camera sled over specific offshore locations, collecting both video and photographic imagery; these “ground-truth” surveying data are available from the CSMP Video and Photograph Portal at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7J1015K. The “seafloor character” data layer shows classifications of the seafloor on the basis of depth, slope, rugosity (ruggedness), and backscatter intensity and which is further informed by the ground-truth-survey imagery. The “potential habitats” polygons are delineated on the basis of substrate type, geomorphology, seafloor process, or other attributes that may provide a habitat for a specific species or assemblage of organisms. Representative seismic-reflection profile data from the map area is also include and provides information on the subsurface stratigraphy and structure of the map area. The distribution and thickness of young sediment (deposited over the past about 21,000 years, during the most recent sea-level rise) is interpreted on the basis of the seismic-reflection data. The geologic polygons merge onshore geologic mapping (compiled from existing maps by the California Geological Survey) and new offshore geologic mapping that is based on integration of high-resolution bathymetry and backscatter imagery seafloor-sediment and rock samplesdigital camera and video imagery, and high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles. The information provided by the map sheets, pamphlet, and data catalog has a broad range of applications. High-resolution bathymetry, acoustic backscatter, ground-truth-surveying imagery, and habitat mapping all contribute to habitat characterization and ecosystem-based management by providing essential data for delineation of marine protected areas and ecosystem restoration. Many of the maps provide high-resolution baselines that will be critical for monitoring environmental change associated with climate change, coastal development, or other forcings. High-resolution bathymetry is a critical component for modeling coastal flooding caused by storms and tsunamis, as well as inundation associated with longer term sea-level rise. Seismic-reflection and bathymetric data help characterize earthquake and tsunami sources, critical for natural-hazard assessments of coastal zones. Information on sediment distribution and thickness is essential to the understanding of local and regional sediment transport, as well as the development of regional sediment-management plans. In addition, siting of any new offshore infrastructure (for example, pipelines, cables, or renewable-energy facilities) will depend on high-resolution mapping. Finally, this mapping will both stimulate and enable new scientific research and also raise public awareness of, and education about, coastal environments and issues. Web services were created using an ArcGIS service definition file. The ArcGIS REST service and OGC WMS service include all Offshore of San Francisco map area data layers. Data layers are symbolized as shown on the associated map sheets.
A. SUMMARY This dataset includes COVID-19 tests by resident neighborhood and specimen collection date (the day the test was collected). Specifically, this dataset includes tests of San Francisco residents who listed a San Francisco home address at the time of testing. These resident addresses were then geo-located and mapped to neighborhoods. The resident address associated with each test is hand-entered and susceptible to errors, therefore neighborhood data should be interpreted as an approximation, not a precise nor comprehensive total.
In recent months, about 5% of tests are missing addresses and therefore cannot be included in any neighborhood totals. In earlier months, more tests were missing address data. Because of this high percentage of tests missing resident address data, this neighborhood testing data for March, April, and May should be interpreted with caution (see below)
Percentage of tests missing address information, by month in 2020 Mar - 33.6% Apr - 25.9% May - 11.1% Jun - 7.2% Jul - 5.8% Aug - 5.4% Sep - 5.1% Oct (Oct 1-12) - 5.1%
To protect the privacy of residents, the City does not disclose the number of tests in neighborhoods with resident populations of fewer than 1,000 people. These neighborhoods are omitted from the data (they include Golden Gate Park, John McLaren Park, and Lands End).
Tests for residents that listed a Skilled Nursing Facility as their home address are not included in this neighborhood-level testing data. Skilled Nursing Facilities have required and repeated testing of residents, which would change neighborhood trends and not reflect the broader neighborhood's testing data.
This data was de-duplicated by individual and date, so if a person gets tested multiple times on different dates, all tests will be included in this dataset (on the day each test was collected).
The total number of positive test results is not equal to the total number of COVID-19 cases in San Francisco. During this investigation, some test results are found to be for persons living outside of San Francisco and some people in San Francisco may be tested multiple times (which is common). To see the number of new confirmed cases by neighborhood, reference this map: https://sf.gov/data/covid-19-case-maps#new-cases-maps
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED COVID-19 laboratory test data is based on electronic laboratory test reports. Deduplication, quality assurance measures and other data verification processes maximize accuracy of laboratory test information. All testing data is then geo-coded by resident address. Then data is aggregated by analysis neighborhood and specimen collection date.
Data are prepared by close of business Monday through Saturday for public display.
C. UPDATE PROCESS Updates automatically at 05:00 Pacific Time each day. Redundant runs are scheduled at 07:00 and 09:00 in case of pipeline failure.
D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET San Francisco population estimates for geographic regions can be found in a view based on the San Francisco Population and Demographic Census dataset. These population estimates are from the 2016-2020 5-year American Community Survey (ACS).
Due to the high degree of variation in the time needed to complete tests by different labs there is a delay in this reporting. On March 24 the Health Officer ordered all labs in the City to report complete COVID-19 testing information to the local and state health departments.
In order to track trends over time, a data user can analyze this data by "specimen_collection_date".
Calculating Percent Positivity: The positivity rate is the percentage of tests that return a positive result for COVID-19 (positive tests divided by the sum of positive and negative tests). Indeterminate results, which could not conclusively determine whether COVID-19 virus was present, are not included in the calculation of pe
This digital map database, compiled from previously published and unpublished data, and new mapping by the authors, represents the general distribution of bedrock and surficial deposits in the mapped area. Together with the accompanying text file (nesfmf.ps, nesfmf.pdf, nesfmf.txt), it provides current information on the geologic structure and stratigraphy of the area covered. The database delineates map units that are identified by general age and lithology following the stratigraphic nomenclature of the U.S. Geological Survey. The scale of the source maps limits the spatial resolution (scale) of the database to 1:62,500 or smaller.
Coastal Zone Area The Coastal Zone Area is a component of the Zoning Map which in turn is a key component of the San Francisco Planning Code. The Zoning Map comprises: - Zoning Districts - Height and Bulk Districts - Special Use Districts - Preservation Districts - Coastal Zone Area - Special Sign Districts The official Zoning Map can be found in the San Francisco Planning Code: http://planningcode.sfplanning.org (click on the links under ZONING MAPS on the left navigation column).
These maps show, for emergency service managers in the San Francisco Bay region, the threshold rainfall that may be capable of triggering a level of debris-flow activity likely to threaten public safety. The maps are products of a continuing series of studies that began after a catastrophic storm on January 3-5, 1982 triggered 18,000 debris flows in the San Francisco Bay region, causing 25 deaths and $66 million in property damage. The threshold rainfall values were estimated by re-evaluating a previous empirical analysis of data from the 1982 storm, and other historical rainfall records, that normalized the rainfall intensity data by dividing by the mean annual precipitation (MAP) of the corresponding rain gage. The present analysis also takes into account the rainfall frequency, the mean annual number of days with non-zero rainfall (#RDs), thereby adjusting for the difference in rainfall frequency between windward-facing slopes where rainfall is orographically enhanced and leeward-facing slopes and valleys that lie within rain shadows where precipitation is reduced. The debris-flow threshold maps were created by digitally combining an existing regional map of mean annual precipitation, a newly compiled data set of #RDs from an analysis of long-term (20-40 years) records of daily rainfall for 33 rain gages in the region, and the re-normalized thresholds from the empirical analysis of historical storm data.
Special Use Districts (SUDs) are a component of the San Francisco Zoning Map. SUD controls are outlined in Article 2 of the San Francisco Planning Code: http://library.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/California/planning/article2usedistricts?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:sanfrancisco_ca$anc=JD_Article2
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A more recent version of this product appears here:
This product will continue to be distributed for archival purposes.
The product is a set of mutually consistent 10m and 2m integrated elevation maps (DEM) in standard ascii format.There are few missing data where there is water or at land-water interfaces. However, our map does have gaps at some inland and island sites. We have opted not to fill these because there is an ongoing project at DWR to re-analyze LiDAR returns and improve the terrestrial map. The CSTARS project at UC Davis is doing this as well.
This product is developed based on synthesizing LiDAR, single- and multibeam sonar soundings and existing integrated maps collated from multiple sources. The following figure shows the data sources used for different areas. The western part of our Bay-Delta work blends the original Foxgrover map with the 1/3 arc second DEM produced by NOAA. These are close in the region of overlap and edge-matches the NOAA data well, but the NOAA map seems to capture things like bridge footings that the original 10m Foxgrover map of the region smooths. A richer 2m product combining new data and some interpolation is due to be release by USGS in Winter or Spring 2013. Our previews of this map indicate that it is heavily based on the 1/3 arc second NOAA map for points near Carquinez Straits. For more information, please refer to the article: A Continuous Surface Elevation Map
Please note that we distribute only our own integrated maps, not the original constituent data.
Version: | 3 |
Time Completed: | November, 2012 |
Horizontal Datum: | NAD83 |
Spheroid: | GRS1980 |
Projection: | UTM_Zone_10N |
Vertical Datum: | NAVD88 |
This part of DS 781 presents data for folds for the geologic and geomorphic map of the Offshore of San Francisco map area, California. The vector data file is included in "Folds_OffshoreSanFrancisco.zip," which is accessible from https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/781/OffshoreSanFrancisco/data_catalog_OffshoreSanFrancisco.html. These data accompany the pamphlet and map sheets of Cochrane, G.R., Johnson, S.Y., Dartnell, P., Greene, H.G., Erdey, M.D., Golden, N.E., Hartwell, S.R., Endris, C.A., Manson, M.W., Sliter, R.W., Kvitek, R.G., Watt, J.T., Ross, S.L., and Bruns, T.R. (G.R. Cochrane and S.A. Cochran, eds.), 2015, California State Waters Map Series—Offshore of San Francisco, California (ver. 1.1, June 2015): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015–1068, pamphlet 39 p., 10 sheets, scale 1:24,000, https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151068. Folds were primarily mapped by interpretation of seismic reflection profile data (see field activities S-15-10-NC and F-2-07-NC). The seismic reflection profiles were collected between 2007 and 2010.