Zoning Districts City and County of San Francisco Planning Department. The Zoning Districts are the main component of the Zoning Map. The Zoning Map comprises: - Zoning Districts - Height and Bulk Districts - Special Use Districts - Preservation Districts - Coastal Zone Area - Special Sign Districts The official Zoning Map can be found in the San Francisco Planning Code: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=14145&stateId=5&stateName=California (click on the links under ZONING MAPS on the left navigation column). Summaries of the Zoning District codes can be found here: http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=1580 Section 105 of the Planning Code states: "The designations, locations and boundaries of the districts established by this Code shall be shown upon the "Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco," which shall consist of a series of numbered sectional maps. Wherever any uncertainty exists as to the boundary of any district as shown on said sectional maps, the following rules shall apply: (a) Where boundary lines are indicated as following streets and alleys within the right-of-way, they shall be construed as following the centerlines of such streets and alleys; (b) Where boundary lines are indicated as approximately following lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be such boundaries; (c) Where a boundary line divides a lot or crosses unsubdivided property; the location of such boundary shall be as indicated upon the Zoning Map using the scale appearing on such map; (d) Where further uncertainty exists, the City Planning Commission upon written application, or on its own motion, shall by resolution determine the location of a disputed boundary giving due consideration to the apparent indicated location thereof and the scale of the Zoning Map and the express purposes of this Code; (e) Wherever any property is not under these rules specifically included in any use district shown on the Zoning Map, such property is hereby declared to be in an RH-1(D) District, except that all property owned on the effective date of this amendment by the United States of America, State of California, City and County of San Francisco, or other governmental agency and within the City and County of San Francisco but not within the area covered by Sectional Maps Nos. 1 through 13 of the Zoning Map is hereby declared to be in a P (Public Use) District unless reclassified in accordance with the provisions of this Code; (f) Wherever any property is not under these rules specifically included in any height and bulk district shown on the Zoning Map, such property is hereby declared to be in a 40-X height and bulk district, except that all property owned on the effective date of this amendment by the United States of America, State of California, City and County of San Francisco, or other governmental agency and within the City and County of San Francisco but not within the area covered by Sectional Maps Nos. 1H through 13H of the Zoning Map is hereby declared to be in an OS (Open Space) District unless reclassified in accordance with the provisions of this Code, with the exception of Yerba Buena Island and Treasure Island which are hereby declared to be in a 40-X height and bulk district."Updated quarterly.

Analysis of ‘Zoning Map - Zoning Districts’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/28f51f62-ddc4-40c4-8e22-32de984f2745 on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Zoning Districts City and County of San Francisco Planning Department. The Zoning Districts are the main component of the Zoning Map. The Zoning Map comprises: - Zoning Districts - Height and Bulk Districts - Special Use Districts - Preservation Districts - Coastal Zone Area - Special Sign Districts The official Zoning Map can be found in the San Francisco Planning Code: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=14145&stateId=5&stateName=California (click on the links under ZONING MAPS on the left navigation column). Summaries of the Zoning District codes can be found here: http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=1580 Section 105 of the Planning Code states: "The designations, locations and boundaries of the districts established by this Code shall be shown upon the "Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco," which shall consist of a series of numbered sectional maps. Wherever any uncertainty exists as to the boundary of any district as shown on said sectional maps, the following rules shall apply: (a) Where boundary lines are indicated as following streets and alleys within the right-of-way, they shall be construed as following the centerlines of such streets and alleys; (b) Where boundary lines are indicated as approximately following lot lines, such lot lines shall be construed to be such boundaries; (c) Where a boundary line divides a lot or crosses unsubdivided property; the location of such boundary shall be as indicated upon the Zoning Map using the scale appearing on such map; (d) Where further uncertainty exists, the City Planning Commission upon written application, or on its own motion, shall by resolution determine the location of a disputed boundary giving due consideration to the apparent indicated location thereof and the scale of the Zoning Map and the express purposes of this Code; (e) Wherever any property is not under these rules specifically included in any use district shown on the Zoning Map, such property is hereby declared to be in an RH-1(D) District, except that all property owned on the effective date of this amendment by the United States of America, State of California, City and County of San Francisco, or other governmental agency and within the City and County of San Francisco but not within the area covered by Sectional Maps Nos. 1 through 13 of the Zoning Map is hereby declared to be in a P (Public Use) District unless reclassified in accordance with the provisions of this Code; (f) Wherever any property is not under these rules specifically included in any height and bulk district shown on the Zoning Map, such property is hereby declared to be in a 40-X height and bulk district, except that all property owned on the effective date of this amendment by the United States of America, State of California, City and County of San Francisco, or other governmental agency and within the City and County of San Francisco but not within the area covered by Sectional Maps Nos. 1H through 13H of the Zoning Map is hereby declared to be in an OS (Open Space) District unless reclassified in accordance with the provisions of this Code, with the exception of Yerba Buena Island and Treasure Island which are hereby declared to be in a 40-X height and bulk district."Updated quarterly.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

This dataset includes one file for each of the 51 counties that were collected, as well as a CA_Merged file with the parcels merged into a single file.Note – this data does not include attributes beyond the parcel ID number (PARNO) – that will be provided when available, most likely by the state of California.DownloadA 1.6 GB zipped file geodatabase is available for download - click here.DescriptionA geodatabase with parcel boundaries for 51 (out of 58) counties in the State of California. The original target was to collect data for the close of the 2013 fiscal year. As the collection progressed, it became clear that holding to that time standard was not practical. Out of expediency, the date requirement was relaxed, and the currently available dataset was collected for a majority of the counties. Most of these were distributed with minimal metadata.The table “ParcelInfo” includes the data that the data came into our possession, and our best estimate of the last time the parcel dataset was updated by the original source. Data sets listed as “Downloaded from” were downloaded from a publicly accessible web or FTP site from the county. Other data sets were provided directly to us by the county, though many of them may also be available for direct download. Â These data have been reprojected to California Albers NAD84, but have not been checked for topology, or aligned to county boundaries in any way. Tulare County’s dataset arrived with an undefined projection and was identified as being California State Plane NAD83 (US Feet) and was assigned by ICE as that projection prior to reprojection. Kings County’s dataset was delivered as individual shapefiles for each of the 50 assessor’s books maintained at the county. These were merged to a single feature class prior to importing to the database.The attribute tables were standardized and truncated to include only a PARNO (APN). The format of these fields has been left identical to the original dataset. The Data Interoperablity Extension ETL tool used in this process is included in the zip file. Where provided by the original data sources, metadata for the original data has been maintained. Please note that the attribute table structure changes were made at ICE, UC Davis, not at the original data sources.Parcel Source InformationCountyDateCollecDateCurrenNotesAlameda4/8/20142/13/2014Download from Alamenda CountyAlpine4/22/20141/26/2012Alpine County PlanningAmador5/21/20145/14/2014Amador County Transportation CommissionButte2/24/20141/6/2014Butte County Association of GovernmentsCalaveras5/13/2014Download from Calaveras County, exact date unknown, labelled 2013Contra Costa4/4/20144/4/2014Contra Costa Assessor’s OfficeDel Norte5/13/20145/8/2014Download from Del Norte CountyEl Dorado4/4/20144/3/2014El Dorado County AssessorFresno4/4/20144/4/2014Fresno County AssessorGlenn4/4/201410/13/2013Glenn County Public WorksHumboldt6/3/20144/25/2014Humbodt County AssessorImperial8/4/20147/18/2014Imperial County AssessorKern3/26/20143/16/2014Kern County AssessorKings4/21/20144/14/2014Kings CountyLake7/15/20147/19/2013Lake CountyLassen7/24/20147/24/2014Lassen CountyLos Angeles10/22/201410/9/2014Los Angeles CountyMadera7/28/2014Madera County, Date Current unclear likely 7/2014Marin5/13/20145/1/2014Marin County AssessorMendocino4/21/20143/27/2014Mendocino CountyMerced7/15/20141/16/2014Merced CountyMono4/7/20144/7/2014Mono CountyMonterey5/13/201410/31/2013Download from Monterey CountyNapa4/22/20144/22/2014Napa CountyNevada10/29/201410/26/2014Download from Nevada CountyOrange3/18/20143/18/2014Download from Orange CountyPlacer7/2/20147/2/2014Placer CountyRiverside3/17/20141/6/2014Download from Riverside CountySacramento4/2/20143/12/2014Sacramento CountySan Benito5/12/20144/30/2014San Benito CountySan Bernardino2/12/20142/12/2014Download from San Bernardino CountySan Diego4/18/20144/18/2014San Diego CountySan Francisco5/23/20145/23/2014Download from San Francisco CountySan Joaquin10/13/20147/1/2013San Joaquin County Fiscal year close dataSan Mateo2/12/20142/12/2014San Mateo CountySanta Barbara4/22/20149/17/2013Santa Barbara CountySanta Clara9/5/20143/24/2014Santa Clara County, Required a PRA requestSanta Cruz2/13/201411/13/2014Download from Santa Cruz CountyShasta4/23/20141/6/2014Download from Shasta CountySierra7/15/20141/20/2014Sierra CountySolano4/24/2014Download from Solano Couty, Boundaries appear to be from 2013Sonoma5/19/20144/3/2014Download from Sonoma CountyStanislaus4/23/20141/22/2014Download from Stanislaus CountySutter11/5/201410/14/2014Download from Sutter CountyTehama1/16/201512/9/2014Tehama CountyTrinity12/8/20141/20/2010Download from Trinity County, Note age of data 2010Tulare7/1/20146/24/2014Tulare CountyTuolumne5/13/201410/9/2013Download from Tuolumne CountyVentura11/4/20146/18/2014Download from Ventura CountyYolo11/4/20149/10/2014Download from Yolo CountyYuba11/12/201412/17/2013Download from Yuba County

A. SUMMARY This dataset delineates parcels with “Taxable Commercial Space” - meaning parcels where one or more property owner(s) and/or commercial tenant(s) are required to file or pay the Commercial Vacancy Tax. The dataset includes the Block, Lot, Parcel Number and Parcel Situs Address for each commercial parcel within the named Districts. Information about each filing received for the parcel is included, such as Filer Type (Owner / Tenant), Filer Name, Parcel Situs Address from the Filing, and Tax Year filed. The dataset also includes whether a parcel is vacant, and if so, the tax rate applied. A single parcel may have multiple addresses and/or filings depending on the number of units and access points. Parcels marked as vacant either reported as vacant in the tax filing or were determined to be vacant by the Tax Collector. All information displayed is subject to audit by the Tax Collector.

If you are a taxpayer and need to update the information displayed, you should re-file https://sftreasurer.org/CommercialVacancy or contact the Tax Collector for assistance.

If you wish to share information about a vacant property subject to the Commercial Vacancy Tax with the Tax Collector to assist with enforcement, visit https://sftreasurer.org/report-vacant-commercial-property

B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED This dataset delineates parcels with “Taxable Commercial Space” - meaning parcels where one or more property owner(s) and/or commercial tenant(s) are required to file or pay the Commercial Vacancy Tax. The dataset includes the Block, Lot, Parcel Number and Parcel Situs Address for each commercial parcel within the named Districts. Information about each filing received for the parcel is included, such as Filer Type (Owner / Tenant), Filer Name, Parcel Situs Address from Filing, Tax Year filed, whether the filer reported a vacancy, and if so, the tax rate applied. A single parcel may have multiple addresses and/or filings depending on the number of units and access points. The information displayed is reported by the taxpayers and subject to audit by the Tax Collector.

C. UPDATE PROCESS Data will be refreshed daily until further notice.

D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET The Commercial Vacancy Tax dataset provides detailed information on commercial properties in San Francisco’s designated Neighborhood Commercial Districts and Neighborhood Commercial Transit Districts that are subject to the Commercial Vacancy Tax. This dataset includes key identifiers such as Block, Lot, Parcel Number, and Situs Address for each commercial parcel. It also lists information for each filing received from property owners, and tenants, including whether the filer reported a space as vacant and, if so, the applicable tax rate. Users can utilize this dataset to identify vacant commercial spaces and assess tax compliance.

E. RELATED DATASETS Registered business location – San Francisco San Francisco Property Information Map Assessor Block Maps

F. KNOWN USES The Commercial Vacancy Tax dataset is primarily used by the San Francisco Office of the Treasurer & Tax Collector to monitor compliance with the city’s Commercial Vacancy Tax ordinance. It supports enforcement by identifying Commercial Space that may be subject to the tax and verifying reported vacancy status. Additionally, researchers, journalists, and community organizations access the data to study the impacts of vacant storefronts.

Comprehensive Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport, 2012

A. SUMMARY This data represents the boundaries of City-owned lands maintained in the City's Facility System of Record (FSR). Note: Not all lands are within the City and County proper. The City owns properties outside of its boundaries, including lands managed by SF Recreation and Parks, SF Public Utilities Commission, and other agencies. Certain lands are managed by following agencies which are not directly part of the City and County of San Francisco, but are included here for reference: San Francisco Housing Authority (SFHA), San Francisco Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (OCII), and City College of San Francisco. B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED The Enterprise GIS program in the Department of Technology is the technical custodian of the FSR. This team creates and maintains this dataset in conjunction with the Real Estate Division and the Capital Planning Program of the City Administrator’s Office, who act as the primary business data stewards for this data. C. UPDATE PROCESS There are a handful of events that may trigger changes to this dataset: 1. The sale of a property 2. The leasing of a property 3. The purchase of a property 4. The change in jurisdiction of a property (e.g. from MTA to DPW) 5. The removal or improvement of the property Each of these changes triggers a workflow that updates the FSR. The Real Estate Division and Capital Planning make updates on an ongoing basis. The full dataset is reviewed quarterly to ensure nothing is missing or needs to be corrected. Updates to the data, once approved, are immediately reflected in the internal system and are updated here in the open dataset on a monthly basis. D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET See here for an interactive map of all the City lands in this dataset. To track the facilities on City lands, join this dataset to the City Facilities dataset using the land_id field. If you see an error in the data, you can submit a change request with the relevant information to dtis.helpdesk@sfgov.org. Please be as specific about the error as you can (including relevant land_id(s)). E. RELATED DATASETS City Facilities

As of November 2023, this map has been updated to use a new format. For details, please see here.
Note: Due to the large file size the Shapefile export option does not work. To access geospatial data please select GeoJSON from the export menu

This data set includes the Office of the Assessor-Recorder’s secured property tax roll spanning from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2023. It includes all legally disclosable information, including location of property, value of property, the unique property identifier, and specific property characteristics. The data is used to accurately and fairly appraise all taxable property in the City and County of San Francisco. The Office of the Assessor-Recorder makes no representation or warranty that the information provided is accurate and/or has no errors or omissions.

This dataset is updated annually after the roll is closed and certified. This typically happens by August of each year.

Please see Map of Land Use - 2023 for most recent data Summary Land Use 2020: Land use categories for every parcel in San Francisco. The land use categories are derived from a range of City and commercial databases. Where building square footages were missing from these databases they were derived from a LIDAR survey flown in 2007. Land use categories are as follows (units are square feet): - CIE = Cultural, Institutional, Educational - MED = Medical - MIPS = Office (Management, Information, Professional Services) - MIXED = Mixed Uses (Without Residential) - MIXRES = Mixed Uses (With Residential) - PDR = Industrial (Production, Distribution, Repair) - RETAIL/ENT = Retail, Entertainment - RESIDENT = Residential - VISITOR = Hotels/Motels - VACANT = Vacant - ROW = Right-of-Way - OPENSPACE = Open Space Other attributes are: - RESUNITS = Residential Units - BLDGSQFT = Square footage data - YRBUILT = year built - TOTAL_USES = Business points from Dun & Bradstreet were spatially aggregated to the closest parcel, and this field is the sum of the square footage fields The subsequent fields (CIE, MED, MIPS, RETAIL, PDER & VISITOR) were derived using the NAICS codes supplied in the Dun & Bradstreet dataset, and the previous TOTAL_USES column. PREDOMINANT LAND USES: - RESIDENTIAL: Housing--from single family to multifamily to high-rise apartment complexes. - CIE - CULTURAL, INDUSTRIAL, EDUCATIONAL:Any cultural, institutional, medical or educational place such as a museum, zoo, hospital, medical center, college, theatre, social service, or membership organization. - MIPS (generally for offices):Management, information, and professional activities such as finance, insurance, and real estate (FIRE), business, legal, and public administration. - RETAIL/ENT(Retail/Entertainment)Shopping and direct consumer services, amusement, recreation and personal services, restaurants and bars -- from neighborhood-serving to region-serving. - PDR (Production/Distribution/Repair):Wholesale trade, showrooms, manufacturing and materials processing, warehousing, repair, businesses, construction, transportation, communications, utilities. - VISITOR:Hotels and motels.PUBLIC:Publicly owned parks, recreation, and open spaces, as well as some highway right of ways. - VACANT:An empty or undeveloped lot. - MIXED USES:Combined uses, such as office and retail, industrial-retail-entertainment, or industrial and office, etc. where no one use predominates. - MIXEDRES (Residential Mixed):Mostly housing with one or more other use (office, retail, industrial)on the ground floor). The determining factor for a parcel's LANDUSE is if the square footage of any non-residential use is 80% or more of its total uses. Otherwise it becomes MIXED. In the case where RESIDENT use has some square footage of non-residential use, this is mainly accessory uses such as home businesses, freelancers, etc.

This project traces the history of urban planning in San Francisco, placing special emphasis on unrealized schemes. Rather than using visual material simply to illustrate outcomes, Imagined San Francisco uses historical plans, maps, architectural renderings, and photographs to show what might have been. By enabling users to layer a series of urban plans, the project presents the city not only as a sequence of material changes, but also as a contingent process and a battleground for political power. Savvy institutional actors--like banks, developers, and many public officials--understood that in some cases to clearly articulate their interests would be to invite challenges. That means that textual sources like newspapers and municipal reports are limited in what they can tell researchers about the shape of political power. Urban plans, however, often speak volumes about interests and dynamics upon which textual sources remain silent. Mortgage lenders, for example, apparently thought it unwise to state that they wished to see a poor neighborhood cleared, to be replaced with a freeway onramp. Yet visual analysis of planning proposals makes that interest plain. So in the process of showing how the city might have looked, Imagined San Francisco also shows how political power actually was negotiated and exercised.

Snapshot of San Francisco Development Pipeline. Tracking of construction and entitlement activity based on data from Dept of Building Inspection's Permit Tracking and the Planning Department's Case Tracking enterprise databases, processed quarterly.

In 2018, the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy (Parks Conservancy) (https://parksconservancy.org), non-profit support partner to the National Park Service (NPS) Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), initiated a fine scale vegetation mapping project in Marin County. The GGNRA includes lands in San Francisco and San Mateo counties, and NPS expressed interest in pursuing fine scale vegetation mapping for those lands as well. The Parks Conservancy facilitated multiple meetings with potential project stakeholders and was able to build a consortium of funders to map all of San Mateo County (and NPS lands in San Francisco). The consortium included the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD), Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST), San Mateo City/County Association of Governments, and various County of San Mateo departments including Parks, Agricultural Weights and Measures, Public Works/Flood Control District, Office of Sustainability, and Planning and Building. Over a 3-year period, the project, collectively referred to as the “San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map”, has produced numerous environmental GIS products including 1-foot contours, orthophotography, and other land cover maps. A 106-class fine-scale vegetation map was completed in April 2022 that details vegetation communities and agricultural land cover types, including forests, grasslands, riparian vegetation, wetlands, and croplands. The environmental data products from the San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map are foundational and can be used by organizations and government departments for a wide range of purposes, including planning, conservation, and to track changes over time to San Mateo County’s habitats and natural resources.Development of the San Mateo fine-scale vegetation map was managed by the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy and staffed by personnel from Tukman Geospatial (https://tukmangeospatial.com/), Aerial Information Systems (AIS; http://www.aisgis.com/), and Kass Green and Associates. The fine-scale vegetation map effort included field surveys by a team of trained botanists including Neal Kramer, Brett Hall, Lucy Ferneyhough, Brittany Burnett, Patrick Furtado, and Rosie Frederick. Data from these surveys, combined with older surveys from previous efforts, were analyzed by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Vegetation Program (https://www.cnps.org/vegetation), with support from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP; https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP) and ecologists with NatureServe (https://www.natureserve.org/) to develop a San Mateo County-specific vegetation classification. For more information on the field sampling and vegetation classification work San Mateo County Fine Scale Vegetation Map Final Report refer to the final report (https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=212663) issued by CNPS and corresponding floristic descriptions (https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=212666 and https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=212667).Existing lidar data, collected in 2017 by San Mateo County was used to support the project. The lidar point cloud, and many of its derivatives, were used extensively during the process of developing the fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. The lidar data was used in conjunction with optical data. Optical data used throughout the project included 6-inch resolution airborne 4-band imagery collected in the summer of 2018, as well as various dates of National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. Key data sets used in the lifeform and the enhanced lifeform mapping process include high resolution aerial imagery from 2018, the lidar-derived Canopy Height Model (CHM), and several other lidar-derived raster and vector datasets. In addition, a number of forest structure lidar derivatives are used in the machine learning portion of the enhanced lifeform workflow.In 2020, an enhanced lifeform map was produced which serves as the foundation for the much more floristically detailed fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. The lifeform map was developed using expert systems rulesets in Trimble Ecognition®, followed by manual editing.In 2020, Tukman Geospatial staff and partners conducted countywide reconnaissance field work to support fine-scale mapping. Field-collected data were used to train automated machine learning algorithms, which produced a fully automated countywide fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. Throughout 2021, AIS manually edited the fine-scale maps, and Tukman Geospatial and AIS went to the field for validation trips to inform and improve the manual editing process. In early January of 2022, draft maps were distributed and reviewed by San Mateo County’s community of land managers and by the funders of the project. Input from these groups was used to further refine the map. The countywide fine-scale vegetation map and related data products were made public in April 2022. In total, 106 vegetation classes were mapped. During the classification development phase, minimum mapping units (MMUs) were established for the vegetation mapping project. An MMU is the smallest area to be mapped on the ground. For this project, the mapping team chose to map different features at different MMUs. The MMU is 1/4 acre for agricultural, woody riparian, and wetland herbaceous classes; 1/2 acre for woody upland, upland herbaceous, and bare land classes; 1/5 acre for developed feature types; and 400 square feet for water.Accuracy assessment plot data were collected in 2021 and 2022. Accuracy assessment results were compiled and analyzed in the April of 2022. Overall accuracy of the lifeform map is 98 percent. Overall accuracy of the fine-scale vegetation map is 83.5 percent, with an overall ‘fuzzy’ accuracy of 90.8 percent.

This report is a digital database package containing both plotfiles and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) databases of shaded relief maps of the San Francisco Bay Region. The data are provided for both the entire region and each county within the region, in two formats. The data is provided as ARC/INFO (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA) GRIDs for use in GIS packages, and as PostScript plotfiles of formatted maps similar to traditional U.S. Geological Survey map products.

[Summary provided by the USGS.]

A log of dataset alerts open, monitored or resolved on the open data portal. Alerts can include issues as well as deprecation or discontinuation notices.

The three Van Ness Ordinances of 1856 to 1858 resulted in the creation and mapping of the Western Addition neighborhood of San Francisco. These five manuscript maps were likely made to show the existing land claims in relation to the newly platted streets, parks, and other public spaces. They may have been used in the subsequent resolution of the various land claims. They show many interesting artifacts of the early settlement of the area before it was officially made a part of the city in the mid 1850's. The 1858 date of the five maps is estimated, based on the creation of the Van Ness map in the same year. Part of the Mission district is also covered. A scanned version of this map was georeferenced as part of the Imagined San Francisco project.

This report is a digital database package containing both plotfiles and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) databases of maps of potential debris flow sources, as well as locations of historic debris flow sources, in the San Francisco Bay Region. The data are provided for both the entire region and each county within the region, in two formats. The data are provided as ARC/INFO (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA) coverages and grids for use in GIS packages, and as PostScript plotfiles of formatted maps similar to traditional U.S. Geological Survey map products.

[Summary provided by the USGS.]

MAP Strategies is a seasoned organization that excels in navigating the complex regulatory process for real estate and construction compliance. With a wealth of experience in streamlining processes, the team at MAP Strategies is dedicated to driving projects towards successful completion. From historic landmark status to coordinated infrastructure projects, MAP Strategies has extensive knowledge in handling various aspects of real estate compliance.

With a proven track record of building strong relationships with city agencies, MAP Strategies provides comprehensive guidance across all disciplines necessary for code compliance and permitting. The organization is headquartered in Chicago, with locations in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle, and has received various certifications, including Women Owned Business (WBE) status. By offering unparalleled concierge service and expert guidance, MAP Strategies has established itself as a premier partner for developers and construction professionals.

This location is part of the Arizona Mineral Industry Location System (AzMILS), an inventory of mineral occurences, prospects and mine locations in Arizona. SantaCruz202 is located in T23S R12E Sec 29 SW in the Ruby - 15 Min quad. This collection consists of various reports, maps, records and related materials acquired by the Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources regarding mining properties in Arizona. Information was obtained by various means, including the property owners, exploration companies, consultants, verbal interviews, field visits, newspapers and publications. Some sections may be redacted for copyright. Please see the access statement.