2 datasets found
  1. f

    DataSheet1_Benchmarking automated cell type annotation tools for single-cell...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 21, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yuge Wang; Xingzhi Sun; Hongyu Zhao (2023). DataSheet1_Benchmarking automated cell type annotation tools for single-cell ATAC-seq data.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1063233.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Yuge Wang; Xingzhi Sun; Hongyu Zhao
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    As single-cell chromatin accessibility profiling methods advance, scATAC-seq has become ever more important in the study of candidate regulatory genomic regions and their roles underlying developmental, evolutionary, and disease processes. At the same time, cell type annotation is critical in understanding the cellular composition of complex tissues and identifying potential novel cell types. However, most existing methods that can perform automated cell type annotation are designed to transfer labels from an annotated scRNA-seq data set to another scRNA-seq data set, and it is not clear whether these methods are adaptable to annotate scATAC-seq data. Several methods have been recently proposed for label transfer from scRNA-seq data to scATAC-seq data, but there is a lack of benchmarking study on the performance of these methods. Here, we evaluated the performance of five scATAC-seq annotation methods on both their classification accuracy and scalability using publicly available single-cell datasets from mouse and human tissues including brain, lung, kidney, PBMC, and BMMC. Using the BMMC data as basis, we further investigated the performance of these methods across different data sizes, mislabeling rates, sequencing depths and the number of cell types unique to scATAC-seq. Bridge integration, which is the only method that requires additional multimodal data and does not need gene activity calculation, was overall the best method and robust to changes in data size, mislabeling rate and sequencing depth. Conos was the most time and memory efficient method but performed the worst in terms of prediction accuracy. scJoint tended to assign cells to similar cell types and performed relatively poorly for complex datasets with deep annotations but performed better for datasets only with major label annotations. The performance of scGCN and Seurat v3 was moderate, but scGCN was the most time-consuming method and had the most similar performance to random classifiers for cell types unique to scATAC-seq.

  2. Sc Joint Development Sole Ltd Sailom Road Ban Sailom Chanthabuly Province...

    • volza.com
    csv
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Volza FZ LLC (2025). Sc Joint Development Sole Ltd Sailom Road Ban Sailom Chanthabuly Province Vietiane Laos Pdr Johnmcke1889 Gmail Com Tel 0892228537 Company profile with phone,email, buyers, suppliers, price, export import shipments. [Dataset]. https://www.volza.com/company-profile/sc-joint-development-sole-ltd-sailom-road-ban-sailom-chanthabuly-province-vietiane-laos-pdr-johnmcke1889-gmail-com-tel-0892228537-14756679
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    Volza FZ LLC
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2014 - Sep 30, 2021
    Area covered
    Chanthabuly, Laos
    Variables measured
    Count of exporters, Count of importers, Sum of export value, Sum of import value, Count of export shipments, Count of import shipments
    Description

    Credit report of Sc Joint Development Sole Ltd Sailom Road Ban Sailom Chanthabuly Province Vietiane Laos Pdr Johnmcke1889 Gmail Com Tel 0892228537 contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.

  3. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Yuge Wang; Xingzhi Sun; Hongyu Zhao (2023). DataSheet1_Benchmarking automated cell type annotation tools for single-cell ATAC-seq data.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1063233.s001

DataSheet1_Benchmarking automated cell type annotation tools for single-cell ATAC-seq data.docx

Related Article
Explore at:
docxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 21, 2023
Dataset provided by
Frontiers
Authors
Yuge Wang; Xingzhi Sun; Hongyu Zhao
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

As single-cell chromatin accessibility profiling methods advance, scATAC-seq has become ever more important in the study of candidate regulatory genomic regions and their roles underlying developmental, evolutionary, and disease processes. At the same time, cell type annotation is critical in understanding the cellular composition of complex tissues and identifying potential novel cell types. However, most existing methods that can perform automated cell type annotation are designed to transfer labels from an annotated scRNA-seq data set to another scRNA-seq data set, and it is not clear whether these methods are adaptable to annotate scATAC-seq data. Several methods have been recently proposed for label transfer from scRNA-seq data to scATAC-seq data, but there is a lack of benchmarking study on the performance of these methods. Here, we evaluated the performance of five scATAC-seq annotation methods on both their classification accuracy and scalability using publicly available single-cell datasets from mouse and human tissues including brain, lung, kidney, PBMC, and BMMC. Using the BMMC data as basis, we further investigated the performance of these methods across different data sizes, mislabeling rates, sequencing depths and the number of cell types unique to scATAC-seq. Bridge integration, which is the only method that requires additional multimodal data and does not need gene activity calculation, was overall the best method and robust to changes in data size, mislabeling rate and sequencing depth. Conos was the most time and memory efficient method but performed the worst in terms of prediction accuracy. scJoint tended to assign cells to similar cell types and performed relatively poorly for complex datasets with deep annotations but performed better for datasets only with major label annotations. The performance of scGCN and Seurat v3 was moderate, but scGCN was the most time-consuming method and had the most similar performance to random classifiers for cell types unique to scATAC-seq.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu