57 datasets found
  1. Data from: SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: journal occurrences with ASJC...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Sep 18, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Piotr Wciślik; Piotr Wciślik; Maciej Maryl; Maciej Maryl; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Lucien Schriber; Lucien Schriber (2020). SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: journal occurrences with ASJC codes [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4034540
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 18, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Piotr Wciślik; Piotr Wciślik; Maciej Maryl; Maciej Maryl; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Lucien Schriber; Lucien Schriber
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Background and methodology:

    The dataset consists of a list of 2202 journal titles represented in the SHAPE-ID Literature Review bibliography, prepared for the purposes of quantitative analysis.

    The list of journals is based on 3955 journal articles in the bibliography dataset that had an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN). To each journal title the project team attributed:

    - a weight factor based on how many articles from the given journal featured in bibliography dataset

    - at least one All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) code, representing different scientific disciplines

    - a country of publication.

    In case of 1853 of those journal titles, the attribution was automatised (we matched the ISSNs of journal titles in our sample against the Scopus Sources list from February 2019). In case of the remaining 349 titles the attribution was accomplished manually, based on the information available in SCOPUS, Web of Science, JSTOR, Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals (MIAR) and ISSN databases.

    Description of the file:

    This is a csv file containing a list of 2202 journal titles represented in the SHAPE-ID Literature Review bibliography, with country of publication and ASJC codes assigned.

    The file is formatted as follows:

    Column A: ISSN of the journal

    Column B: information on how country and ASJC codes were attributed. Value “N” indicates automatic attribution based on match with Scopus list of sources. Other values indicate manual attribution. Values WOS, SCOPUS, JSTOR indicate source of information. Valu “Y” indicates that information was compiled based on multiple sources.

    Column C: numeric values correspond to the weight factor, i.e. number of time articles from each journal featured in the SHAP-ID Literature Review bibliography.

    Column D: SHAPE-ID Zotero bibliography identifier.

    Column E: Journal title

    Column F: The country of publication

    Columns G-AD: ASJC codes (numeric and word values) associated with journal entries.

  2. Data from: Journal Ranking Dataset

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Aug 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Abir (2023). Journal Ranking Dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/xabirhasan/journal-ranking-dataset
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Abir
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Journals & Ranking

    An academic journal or research journal is a periodical publication in which research articles relating to a particular academic discipline is published, according to Wikipedia. Currently, there are more than 25,000 peer-reviewed journals that are indexed in citation index databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. These indexes are ranked on the basis of various metrics such as CiteScore, H-index, etc. The metrics are calculated from yearly citation data of the journal. A lot of efforts are given to make a metric that reflects the journal's quality.

    Journal Ranking Dataset

    This is a comprehensive dataset on the academic journals coving their metadata information as well as citation, metrics, and ranking information. Detailed data on their subject area is also given in this dataset. The dataset is collected from the following indexing databases: - Scimago Journal Ranking - Scopus - Web of Science Master Journal List

    The data is collected by scraping and then it was cleaned, details of which can be found in HERE.

    Key Features

    • Rank: Overall rank of journal (derived from sorted SJR index).
    • Title: Name or title of journal.
    • OA: Open Access or not.
    • Country: Country of origin.
    • SJR-index: A citation index calculated by Scimago.
    • CiteScore: A citation index calculated by Scopus.
    • H-index: Hirsh index, the largest number h such that at least h articles in that journal were cited at least h times each.
    • Best Quartile: Top Q-index or quartile a journal has in any subject area.
    • Best Categories: Subject areas with top quartile.
    • Best Subject Area: Highest ranking subject area.
    • Best Subject Rank: Rank of the highest ranking subject area.
    • Total Docs.: Total number of documents of the journal.
    • Total Docs. 3y: Total number of documents in the past 3 years.
    • Total Refs.: Total number of references of the journal.
    • Total Cites 3y: Total number of citations in the past 3 years.
    • Citable Docs. 3y: Total number of citable documents in the past 3 years.
    • Cites/Doc. 2y: Total number of citations divided by the total number of documents in the past 2 years.
    • Refs./Doc.: Total number of references divided by the total number of documents.
    • Publisher: Name of the publisher company of the journal.
    • Core Collection: Web of Science core collection name.
    • Coverage: Starting year of coverage.
    • Active: Active or inactive.
    • In-Press: Articles in press or not.
    • ISO Language Code: Three-letter ISO 639 code for language.
    • ASJC Codes: All Science Journal Classification codes for the journal.

    Rest of the features provide further details on the journal's subject area or category: - Life Sciences: Top level subject area. - Social Sciences: Top level subject area. - Physical Sciences: Top level subject area. - Health Sciences: Top level subject area. - 1000 General: ASJC main category. - 1100 Agricultural and Biological Sciences: ASJC main category. - 1200 Arts and Humanities: ASJC main category. - 1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: ASJC main category. - 1400 Business, Management and Accounting: ASJC main category. - 1500 Chemical Engineering: ASJC main category. - 1600 Chemistry: ASJC main category. - 1700 Computer Science: ASJC main category. - 1800 Decision Sciences: ASJC main category. - 1900 Earth and Planetary Sciences: ASJC main category. - 2000 Economics, Econometrics and Finance: ASJC main category. - 2100 Energy: ASJC main category. - 2200 Engineering: ASJC main category. - 2300 Environmental Science: ASJC main category. - 2400 Immunology and Microbiology: ASJC main category. - 2500 Materials Science: ASJC main category. - 2600 Mathematics: ASJC main category. - 2700 Medicine: ASJC main category. - 2800 Neuroscience: ASJC main category. - 2900 Nursing: ASJC main category. - 3000 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: ASJC main category. - 3100 Physics and Astronomy: ASJC main category. - 3200 Psychology: ASJC main category. - 3300 Social Sciences: ASJC main category. - 3400 Veterinary: ASJC main category. - 3500 Dentistry: ASJC main category. - 3600 Health Professions: ASJC main category.

  3. f

    table1_Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote; Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez; Abraham Mendoza; Félix de Moya-Anegón (2023). table1_Comparative Analysis of the Bibliographic Data Sources Dimensions and Scopus: An Approach at the Country and Institutional Levels.xlsx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.593494.s001
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote; Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez; Abraham Mendoza; Félix de Moya-Anegón
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This paper presents a large-scale document-level comparison of two major bibliographic data sources: Scopus and Dimensions. The focus is on the differences in their coverage of documents at two levels of aggregation: by country and by institution. The main goal is to analyze whether Dimensions offers as good new opportunities for bibliometric analysis at the country and institutional levels as it does at the global level. Differences in the completeness and accuracy of citation links are also studied. The results allow a profile of Dimensions to be drawn in terms of its coverage by country and institution. Dimensions’ coverage is more than 25% greater than Scopus which is consistent with previous studies. However, the main finding of this study is the lack of affiliation data in a large fraction of Dimensions documents. We found that close to half of all documents in Dimensions are not associated with any country of affiliation while the proportion of documents without this data in Scopus is much lower. This situation mainly affects the possibilities that Dimensions can offer as instruments for carrying out bibliometric analyses at the country and institutional level. Both of these aspects are highly pragmatic considerations for information retrieval and the design of policies for the use of scientific databases in research evaluation.

  4. r

    Journal of Political Economy Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk

    • researchhelpdesk.org
    Updated Feb 23, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Help Desk (2022). Journal of Political Economy Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk [Dataset]. https://www.researchhelpdesk.org/journal/impact-factor-if/602/journal-of-political-economy
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 23, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Help Desk
    Description

    Journal of Political Economy Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - The Journal of Political Economy is a monthly peer-reviewed academic journal published by the University of Chicago Press. Established by James Laurence Laughlin in 1892, it covers both theoretical and empirical economics. In the past, the journal published quarterly from its introduction through 1905, ten issues per volume from 1906 through 1921, and bimonthly from 1922 through 2019. The editor-in-chief is Magne Mogstad (University of Chicago). Abstract & Indexing Articles that appear in the Journal of Political Economy are indexed in the following abstracting and indexing services: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory (Print) Ulrichsweb (Online) J-Gate HINARI Association for Asian Studies Bibliography of Asian Studies (Online) Business Index CABI Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases (Online) Agricultural Economics Database CAB Abstracts (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux) Dairy Science Abstracts (Online) Environmental Impact Global Health Leisure Tourism Database Nutrition and Food Sciences Database Rural Development Abstracts (Online) Soil Science Database Soils and Fertilizers (Online) Tropical Diseases Bulletin (Online) World Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Abstracts (Online) Clarivate Analytics Current Contents Social Sciences Citation Index Web of Science De Gruyter Saur Dietrich's Index Philosophicus IBZ - Internationale Bibliographie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenliteratur Internationale Bibliographie der Rezensionen Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlicher Literatur EBSCOhost America: History and Life ATLA Religion Database (American Theological Library Association) Biography Index: Past and Present (H.W. Wilson) Book Review Digest Plus (H.W. Wilson) Business Source Alumni Edition (Full Text) Business Source Complete (Full Text) Business Source Corporate (Full Text) Business Source Corporate Plus (Full Text) Business Source Elite (Full Text) Business Source Premier (Full Text) Business Source Ultimate (Full Text) Current Abstracts EBSCO MegaFILE (Full Text) EBSCO Periodicals Collection (Full Text) EconLit with Full Text (Full Text) ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) GeoRef Historical Abstracts (Online) Humanities & Social Sciences Index Retrospective: 1907-1984 (H.W. Wilson) Humanities Index Retrospective: 1907-1984 (H.W. Wilson) Humanities Source Humanities Source Ultimate Index to Legal Periodicals Retrospective: 1908-1981 (H.W. Wilson) Legal Source Library & Information Science Source MLA International Bibliography (Modern Language Association) OmniFile Full Text Mega (H.W. Wilson) Poetry & Short Story Reference Center Political Science Complete Public Affairs Index Readers' Guide Retrospective: 1890-1982 (H.W. Wilson) Russian Academy of Sciences Bibliographies Social Sciences Abstracts Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) Social Sciences Index Retrospective: 1907-1983 (H.W. Wilson) SocINDEX SocINDEX with Full Text TOC Premier Women's Studies International Elsevier BV GEOBASE Scopus ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) Gale Academic ASAP Academic OneFile Advanced Placement Government and Social Studies Book Review Index Plus Business & Company ProFile ASAP Business ASAP Business ASAP International Business Collection Business Insights: Essentials Business Insights: Global Business, Economics and Theory Collection Expanded Academic ASAP General Business File ASAP General OneFile General Reference Center Gold General Reference Centre International InfoTrac Custom InfoTrac Student Edition MLA International Bibliography (Modern Language Association) Popular Magazines US History Collection H.W. Wilson Social Sciences Index National Library of Medicine PubMed OCLC ArticleFirst Periodical Abstracts Sociological Abstracts (Online), Selective Ovid EconLit ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) GeoRef ProQuest ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (American Business Information) ABI/INFORM Research (American Business Information) Business Premium Collection EconLit ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) GeoRef Health Management Database Health Research Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Core MLA International Bibliography (Modern Language Association) PAIS Archive Professional ABI/INFORM Complete Professional ProQuest Central ProQuest 5000 ProQuest 5000 International ProQuest Central ProQuest Pharma Collection Research Library Social Science Database Social Science Premium Collection Sociological Abstracts (Online), Selective Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, Selective SCIMP (Selective Cooperative Index of Management Periodicals) Taylor & Francis Educational Research Abstracts Online Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia Asian - Pacific Economic Literature (Online)

  5. f

    Scopus Bibliometric Dataset: Insights into Information Efficiency

    • figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Sep 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Paul Ovidiu Handro (2023). Scopus Bibliometric Dataset: Insights into Information Efficiency [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24115500.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Paul Ovidiu Handro
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset consists of bibliographic records extracted from the Scopus database in December 2022. The initial database included 30,551 papers, but it was refined to 8,289 papers using a Bradford filter (Bradford, 1934) with the assistance of Bibliometrix, an R package. Dataset Fields:AU: AuthorsAuthor.s..ID: Author identifiersTI: TitlePY: Publication yearSO: Source (journal or conference)TC: Total citationsDI: Digital Object Identifier (DOI)URL: Uniform Resource Locator (URL)Affiliations: Author affiliationsAB: AbstractDE: Keywords (descriptors)ID: Scopus document identifierCR: Cited referencesRP: Reference countISSN: International Standard Serial NumberISBN: International Standard Book NumberCODEN: CODEN (CDS identification code)JI: Journal identifierDT: Document typeDB: Scopus database sourceUT: Unique identifierJ9: Journal nameAU_UN: Authors' unified namesAU1_UN: First author's unified nameAU_UN_NR: Number of authors' unified namesSR_FULL: Full source titleSR: Source abbreviationLA: LanguageAge: Age of the paperTCpY: Total citations per yearNTC: Number of total citations

  6. d

    Global patterns and gaps in the study of terrestrial birds and mammals’...

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Mar 14, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Carlos M. Delgado-MartÃnez; Melanie Kolb; FermÃn Pascual†RamÃrez; Eduardo Mendoza (2025). Global patterns and gaps in the study of terrestrial birds and mammals’ use of freshwater sources: A mapping review [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8pk0p2p03
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Carlos M. Delgado-Martínez; Melanie Kolb; Fermín Pascual†Ramírez; Eduardo Mendoza
    Description

    Water availability strongly influences the ecology of terrestrial birds and mammals. It will likely play an increasing role as a limiting factor as climate change and human demand make water availability scarcer. However, we lack a knowledge synthesis describing our current understanding of the use of water sources, particularly for wildlife hydration. To provide a comprehensive overview of the available research regarding the utilization of water bodies as hydration sources by terrestrial birds and mammals, we conducted a mapping review based on an extensive search of papers in the Web of Science and Scopus databases published up to 2022. We compiled 181 papers that met our inclusion criteria. Earlier papers date back to 1965, but a stable production was not reached until 2005, and significant growth since 2015. The USA, Mexico, and Zimbabwe had the most published papers. Studies were concentrated in areas with a mean annual precipitation lower than 1000 mm, predominantly deserts and x..., , , # Global patterns and gaps in the study of terrestrial birds and mammals use of freshwater sources: A mapping review

    https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8pk0p2p03

    Description of the data and file structure

    This database contains the articles that met all the inclusion criteria for a mapping review on using freshwater sources by terrestrial birds and mammals. The review aims to synthesize global research on how these animal groups utilize water bodies, particularly for hydration, in the context of climate change and increasing water scarcity. The dataset includes bibliographic information and study characteristics for 181 papers published up to 2022, sourced from Web of Science and Scopus.

    Files and variables

    File: Database.xlsx

    Description: The file contains bibliographic information and study characteristics for 181 paperson the use of freshwater sources by terrestrial birds and mammals.

    | Variable | **Expla...,

  7. Dataset: A Systematic Literature Review on the topic of High-value datasets

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    bin, png, txt
    Updated Jul 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anastasija Nikiforova; Anastasija Nikiforova; Nina Rizun; Nina Rizun; Magdalena Ciesielska; Magdalena Ciesielska; Charalampos Alexopoulos; Charalampos Alexopoulos; Andrea Miletič; Andrea Miletič (2024). Dataset: A Systematic Literature Review on the topic of High-value datasets [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8075918
    Explore at:
    png, bin, txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Anastasija Nikiforova; Anastasija Nikiforova; Nina Rizun; Nina Rizun; Magdalena Ciesielska; Magdalena Ciesielska; Charalampos Alexopoulos; Charalampos Alexopoulos; Andrea Miletič; Andrea Miletič
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains data collected during a study ("Towards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review") conducted by Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Tartu), Nina Rizun, Magdalena Ciesielska (Gdańsk University of Technology), Charalampos Alexopoulos (University of the Aegean) and Andrea Miletič (University of Zagreb)
    It being made public both to act as supplementary data for "Towards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review" paper (pre-print is available in Open Access here -> https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10234) and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work.


    The protocol is intended for the Systematic Literature review on the topic of High-value Datasets with the aim to gather information on how the topic of High-value datasets (HVD) and their determination has been reflected in the literature over the years and what has been found by these studies to date, incl. the indicators used in them, involved stakeholders, data-related aspects, and frameworks. The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the SLR over Scopus, Web of Science, and Digital Government Research library (DGRL) in 2023.

    ***Methodology***

    To understand how HVD determination has been reflected in the literature over the years and what has been found by these studies to date, all relevant literature covering this topic has been studied. To this end, the SLR was carried out to by searching digital libraries covered by Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), Digital Government Research library (DGRL).

    These databases were queried for keywords ("open data" OR "open government data") AND ("high-value data*" OR "high value data*"), which were applied to the article title, keywords, and abstract to limit the number of papers to those, where these objects were primary research objects rather than mentioned in the body, e.g., as a future work. After deduplication, 11 articles were found unique and were further checked for relevance. As a result, a total of 9 articles were further examined. Each study was independently examined by at least two authors.

    To attain the objective of our study, we developed the protocol, where the information on each selected study was collected in four categories: (1) descriptive information, (2) approach- and research design- related information, (3) quality-related information, (4) HVD determination-related information.

    ***Test procedure***
    Each study was independently examined by at least two authors, where after the in-depth examination of the full-text of the article, the structured protocol has been filled for each study.
    The structure of the survey is available in the supplementary file available (see Protocol_HVD_SLR.odt, Protocol_HVD_SLR.docx)
    The data collected for each study by two researchers were then synthesized in one final version by the third researcher.

    ***Description of the data in this data set***

    Protocol_HVD_SLR provides the structure of the protocol
    Spreadsheets #1 provides the filled protocol for relevant studies.
    Spreadsheet#2 provides the list of results after the search over three indexing databases, i.e. before filtering out irrelevant studies

    The information on each selected study was collected in four categories:
    (1) descriptive information,
    (2) approach- and research design- related information,
    (3) quality-related information,
    (4) HVD determination-related information

    Descriptive information
    1) Article number - a study number, corresponding to the study number assigned in an Excel worksheet
    2) Complete reference - the complete source information to refer to the study
    3) Year of publication - the year in which the study was published
    4) Journal article / conference paper / book chapter - the type of the paper -{journal article, conference paper, book chapter}
    5) DOI / Website- a link to the website where the study can be found
    6) Number of citations - the number of citations of the article in Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science
    7) Availability in OA - availability of an article in the Open Access
    8) Keywords - keywords of the paper as indicated by the authors
    9) Relevance for this study - what is the relevance level of the article for this study? {high / medium / low}

    Approach- and research design-related information
    10) Objective / RQ - the research objective / aim, established research questions
    11) Research method (including unit of analysis) - the methods used to collect data, including the unit of analy-sis (country, organisation, specific unit that has been ana-lysed, e.g., the number of use-cases, scope of the SLR etc.)
    12) Contributions - the contributions of the study
    13) Method - whether the study uses a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods approach?
    14) Availability of the underlying research data- whether there is a reference to the publicly available underly-ing research data e.g., transcriptions of interviews, collected data, or explanation why these data are not shared?
    15) Period under investigation - period (or moment) in which the study was conducted
    16) Use of theory / theoretical concepts / approaches - does the study mention any theory / theoretical concepts / approaches? If any theory is mentioned, how is theory used in the study?

    Quality- and relevance- related information
    17) Quality concerns - whether there are any quality concerns (e.g., limited infor-mation about the research methods used)?
    18) Primary research object - is the HVD a primary research object in the study? (primary - the paper is focused around the HVD determination, sec-ondary - mentioned but not studied (e.g., as part of discus-sion, future work etc.))

    HVD determination-related information
    19) HVD definition and type of value - how is the HVD defined in the article and / or any other equivalent term?
    20) HVD indicators - what are the indicators to identify HVD? How were they identified? (components & relationships, “input -> output")
    21) A framework for HVD determination - is there a framework presented for HVD identification? What components does it consist of and what are the rela-tionships between these components? (detailed description)
    22) Stakeholders and their roles - what stakeholders or actors does HVD determination in-volve? What are their roles?
    23) Data - what data do HVD cover?
    24) Level (if relevant) - what is the level of the HVD determination covered in the article? (e.g., city, regional, national, international)


    ***Format of the file***
    .xls, .csv (for the first spreadsheet only), .odt, .docx

    ***Licenses or restrictions***
    CC-BY

    For more info, see README.txt

  8. Raw data - Scopus Lepidoptera Rearing

    • zenodo.org
    • explore.openaire.eu
    Updated Sep 18, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ADRIANA MARCELA SANTOS-DIAZ; ADRIANA MARCELA SANTOS-DIAZ (2024). Raw data - Scopus Lepidoptera Rearing [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13786142
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    ADRIANA MARCELA SANTOS-DIAZ; ADRIANA MARCELA SANTOS-DIAZ
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This systematic literature review investigates the body of research on rearing conditions of Lepidoptera insects in laboratory settings. A bibliometric analysis conducted on 368 documents extracted from the Scopus database reveals a historical overview spanning from 1836 to 2023, highlighting significant trends in publication rates and citation counts. Despite a consistent rise in yearly publication rates, citation frequencies have notably declined over time. The analysis further explores geographic trends, with authors from forty-nine countries contributing to the research landscape. Brazil emerges as the leading contributor, followed by the United States and China. Additionally, the study identifies 159 different journals publishing articles on the subject, with the Journal of Economic Entomology leading in publication frequency. The most cited article focuses on the transgenic enhancement of rice plants against lepidopteran pests. Further examination, with an emphasis on factors influencing rearing conditions and behavioral studies, categorizes research topics into areas such as basic biology, biological control, and ethological control. Clustering analysis reveals distinct research foci, including the study of larval physiology, host-parasite interactions, and the genetic basis of biological control strategies such as Bacillus thuringiensis and transgenic plants. Studies focusing on the most common species of Lepidoptera, Spodoptera frugiperda, are also identified. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the research trends and thematic areas in the field of the rearing of Lepidoptera under laboratory conditions and can be a source of information for researchers interested in this field.

  9. m

    Ulrich, Web of Science and Scopus Global Journal Coverage Data:...

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Apr 17, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Toluwase Asubiaro (2023). Ulrich, Web of Science and Scopus Global Journal Coverage Data: Classification by Regions [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/cvx3f5bk4p.2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 17, 2023
    Authors
    Toluwase Asubiaro
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Introduction: These datasets contain information about journals in the eight regions of the world based on United Nations SDG classification (Central& Southern Asia, Europe, Eastern &South Eastern Asia, Latin America, North Africa& Western Asia, Oceania, North America and Sub-Saharan Africa) that are indexed in Web of Science/Scopus and are available in Ulrich periodical directory. The datasets were created by matching Ulrich journal information with journal information from Web of Science and Scopus.

    Data Creation: A single Web of Science master journal list was created for SSCI, SCI, AHCI and ESCI by combining and removing duplicate records from their lists; the Web of Science master journal contained 21,908 unique journals. Only active scholarly journals from Scopus were included in this study; i.e. duplicates, all inactive sources, trade journals, book series, monographs and conference proceedings were removed. 26,029 active journals of the 43,013 sources in Scopus were included. Journal lists from 239 countries were collected from Ulrich comprehensive periodical directory and analyzed by region. After removal of duplicates, this generated a database of 83,429 unique active academic journals. To compile regional and global datasets, duplicate journals in the regional and global levels, respectively, were removed. The master journal lists created from Web of Science, Scopus and Ulrich were transferred to an SQL database for querying. Journal matching was carried out in two steps. Firstly, the ISSN numbers of journals in Web of Science and Scopus were used to match journal records to Ulrich. In the second step, the remaining journals were then matched using their titles, and these matches were manually verified to reduce the chances of false positives. Using these two steps, we were able to match 20,255 (92.46%) of the journals in Web of Science, and 23,349 (89.70%) of the academic journals from Scopus, with Ulrichsweb journal list.

  10. f

    Data from: Open access in the context of Information Science research

    • scielo.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lígia Parreira Muniz GÄAL; Márcio Souza MARTINS (2023). Open access in the context of Information Science research [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21639949.v1
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    SciELO journals
    Authors
    Lígia Parreira Muniz GÄAL; Márcio Souza MARTINS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Abstract Open access is a scientific dissemination mechanism that aims to democratize access to scientific research results, removing barriers to access and permission to published content. Such barriers often marginalize authors, institutions, or countries with less financial resources. In this context, this work aims to understand the world scenario of open access research, in the field of Information Science, in the last six years (2015 to 2020) and to identify possible suggestions that can improve the future of research on this subject. Bibliometric analysis was used to achieve these objectives. We used Scopus database as a source of information, combined with the SciVal tool. As a result, 1139 documents were retrieved on the open access area, and from the analyses, it was possible to characterize the sample, identify the main contributors and verify the quality of research on the open access field. We were also able to identify the main actors in the international scope, the research areas most engaged with the open access and to propose, from the complementary literature, a proposal to promote open access research through international and national collaborations among other authors.

  11. DimensionsVSScopus_CorrelationalStudy

    • figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Apr 4, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tipawan Silwattananusarn; Pachisa Kulkanjanapiban (2021). DimensionsVSScopus_CorrelationalStudy [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13718368.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 4, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Tipawan Silwattananusarn; Pachisa Kulkanjanapiban
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    A dataset of research study entitled "Comparative Analysis of Dimensions and Scopus Bibliographic Data Sources: An Approach at the Research Productivity of University Members"

  12. Data from: Growth and Development of Global Startup Research: A Bibliometric...

    • figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shashikumara AA; Manu T R; Viral Asjola; Panna Chaudhary; Rutu Parekh; Manish Mankad (2023). Growth and Development of Global Startup Research: A Bibliometric Analysis [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4263329.v2
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Shashikumara AA; Manu T R; Viral Asjola; Panna Chaudhary; Rutu Parekh; Manish Mankad
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    A startup is a new platform formed to search for a repeatable and scalable business model. It has usually a combination of two things: an interesting problem or need, and an approach for solving that problem. The present study is the assessment of growth and development of startup research which describes the publication growth, contribution and the impact of startup research carried out by the researcher around the world. The study examines the research articles published on the startup covered by the Scopus database. The main aim of the study is to examine the research growth and development on startup since its establishment. The result shows that the startup research has grown extensively since 19th century, and have significant contributions in the various subject areas, spanning across in multilingual geographies, and in the research and academic universities. Scopus, a citation and bibliographical database was used to retrieve the research articles published on the startup. Keyword-based search performed through simple search facility, startup as the keyword used to retrieve the data and data were extracted as on 25th July 2018 from the Scopus database. A major strength of this database is the sufficient coverage it provides over 21,500 journal titles, including 4,200 Open Access journals from more than 5,000 international publishers. Authors have used the Microsoft Excel for analyzing the cited references by the following criteria:

    ·
    Year-wise publications growth startup research

    ·
    Various document type published on startup

    ·
    Subject area coverage

    ·
    Worldwide geographical contribution on startup research

    ·
    Top 10 source titles

    ·
    Top 10 prolific authors on startup

    ·
    Top Institutes contributions

    ·
    Top 10 cited startup publications

    ·
    Language coverage

  13. f

    Tourism research from its inception to present day: Subject area, geography,...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrei P. Kirilenko; Svetlana Stepchenkova (2023). Tourism research from its inception to present day: Subject area, geography, and gender distributions [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206820
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Andrei P. Kirilenko; Svetlana Stepchenkova
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This paper uses text data mining to identify long-term developments in tourism academic research from the perspectives of thematic focus, geography, and gender of tourism authorship. Abstracts of papers published in the period of 1970–2017 in high-ranking tourist journals were extracted from the Scopus database and served as data source for the analysis. Fourteen subject areas were identified using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) text mining approach. LDA integrated with GIS information allowed to obtain geography distribution and trends of scholarly output, while probabilistic methods of gender identification based on social network data mining were used to track gender dynamics with sufficient confidence. The findings indicate that, while all 14 topics have been prominent from the inception of tourism studies to the present day, the geography of scholarship has notably expanded and the share of female authorship has increased through time and currently almost equals that of male authorship.

  14. r

    Journal of Political Economy FAQ - ResearchHelpDesk

    • researchhelpdesk.org
    Updated May 26, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Research Help Desk (2022). Journal of Political Economy FAQ - ResearchHelpDesk [Dataset]. https://www.researchhelpdesk.org/journal/faq/602/journal-of-political-economy
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 26, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Research Help Desk
    Description

    Journal of Political Economy FAQ - ResearchHelpDesk - The Journal of Political Economy is a monthly peer-reviewed academic journal published by the University of Chicago Press. Established by James Laurence Laughlin in 1892, it covers both theoretical and empirical economics. In the past, the journal published quarterly from its introduction through 1905, ten issues per volume from 1906 through 1921, and bimonthly from 1922 through 2019. The editor-in-chief is Magne Mogstad (University of Chicago). Abstract & Indexing Articles that appear in the Journal of Political Economy are indexed in the following abstracting and indexing services: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory (Print) Ulrichsweb (Online) J-Gate HINARI Association for Asian Studies Bibliography of Asian Studies (Online) Business Index CABI Abstracts on Hygiene and Communicable Diseases (Online) Agricultural Economics Database CAB Abstracts (Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux) Dairy Science Abstracts (Online) Environmental Impact Global Health Leisure Tourism Database Nutrition and Food Sciences Database Rural Development Abstracts (Online) Soil Science Database Soils and Fertilizers (Online) Tropical Diseases Bulletin (Online) World Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Abstracts (Online) Clarivate Analytics Current Contents Social Sciences Citation Index Web of Science De Gruyter Saur Dietrich's Index Philosophicus IBZ - Internationale Bibliographie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Zeitschriftenliteratur Internationale Bibliographie der Rezensionen Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftlicher Literatur EBSCOhost America: History and Life ATLA Religion Database (American Theological Library Association) Biography Index: Past and Present (H.W. Wilson) Book Review Digest Plus (H.W. Wilson) Business Source Alumni Edition (Full Text) Business Source Complete (Full Text) Business Source Corporate (Full Text) Business Source Corporate Plus (Full Text) Business Source Elite (Full Text) Business Source Premier (Full Text) Business Source Ultimate (Full Text) Current Abstracts EBSCO MegaFILE (Full Text) EBSCO Periodicals Collection (Full Text) EconLit with Full Text (Full Text) ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) GeoRef Historical Abstracts (Online) Humanities & Social Sciences Index Retrospective: 1907-1984 (H.W. Wilson) Humanities Index Retrospective: 1907-1984 (H.W. Wilson) Humanities Source Humanities Source Ultimate Index to Legal Periodicals Retrospective: 1908-1981 (H.W. Wilson) Legal Source Library & Information Science Source MLA International Bibliography (Modern Language Association) OmniFile Full Text Mega (H.W. Wilson) Poetry & Short Story Reference Center Political Science Complete Public Affairs Index Readers' Guide Retrospective: 1890-1982 (H.W. Wilson) Russian Academy of Sciences Bibliographies Social Sciences Abstracts Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) Social Sciences Index Retrospective: 1907-1983 (H.W. Wilson) SocINDEX SocINDEX with Full Text TOC Premier Women's Studies International Elsevier BV GEOBASE Scopus ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) Gale Academic ASAP Academic OneFile Advanced Placement Government and Social Studies Book Review Index Plus Business & Company ProFile ASAP Business ASAP Business ASAP International Business Collection Business Insights: Essentials Business Insights: Global Business, Economics and Theory Collection Expanded Academic ASAP General Business File ASAP General OneFile General Reference Center Gold General Reference Centre International InfoTrac Custom InfoTrac Student Edition MLA International Bibliography (Modern Language Association) Popular Magazines US History Collection H.W. Wilson Social Sciences Index National Library of Medicine PubMed OCLC ArticleFirst Periodical Abstracts Sociological Abstracts (Online), Selective Ovid EconLit ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) GeoRef ProQuest ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (American Business Information) ABI/INFORM Research (American Business Information) Business Premium Collection EconLit ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) GeoRef Health Management Database Health Research Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Core MLA International Bibliography (Modern Language Association) PAIS Archive Professional ABI/INFORM Complete Professional ProQuest Central ProQuest 5000 ProQuest 5000 International ProQuest Central ProQuest Pharma Collection Research Library Social Science Database Social Science Premium Collection Sociological Abstracts (Online), Selective Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, Selective SCIMP (Selective Cooperative Index of Management Periodicals) Taylor & Francis Educational Research Abstracts Online Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia Asian - Pacific Economic Literature (Online)

  15. m

    Data for Meta Analysis - Ebook Language Learning

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Sep 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Virgiawan Listanto (2024). Data for Meta Analysis - Ebook Language Learning [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/8757gxmwzx.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 16, 2024
    Authors
    Virgiawan Listanto
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This spreadsheet contains data from studies on e-books and English language learning. The data is from reliable sources in the Scopus database. It includes details like sample sizes, means, and standard deviations for both control and experimental groups. We include the algorithm that we use in the R studio software that we use.

  16. A

    ‘E-Finance Research Dataset (1981-2019)’ analyzed by Analyst-2

    • analyst-2.ai
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com), ‘E-Finance Research Dataset (1981-2019)’ analyzed by Analyst-2 [Dataset]. https://analyst-2.ai/analysis/kaggle-e-finance-research-dataset-1981-2019-a723/60abc33a/?iid=009-850&v=presentation
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai) / Inspirient GmbH (inspirient.com)
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Analysis of ‘E-Finance Research Dataset (1981-2019)’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/saurabhshahane/efinance-research-dataset-19812019 on 13 February 2022.

    --- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

    Context

    The e-finance or electronic finance research & publication dataset, which was indexed by Scopus from 1981 to 2019. The dataset contains data authors, authors ID Scopus, title, year, source title, volume, issue, article number in Scopus, DOI, link, affiliation, abstract, index keywords, references, Correspondence Address, editors, publisher, conference name, conference date, conference code, ISSN, language, document type, access type, and EID.

    Acknowledgements

    Purnomo, Agung; Susanti, Triana (2020), “E-Finance Research Dataset (1981-2019)”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/n425s4ydtt.1

    --- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

  17. Z

    Data from: Risk and Opportunity of Telemedicine in Healthcare Management

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • live.european-language-grid.eu
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 19, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mayukh Mukhopadhyay (2024). Risk and Opportunity of Telemedicine in Healthcare Management [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_4031923
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Mayukh Mukhopadhyay
    Kaushik Ghosh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset covers five bibliometric data based on telemedicine literature found in Scopus indexed trade journals. We extracted 143 publication metadata from Scopus database based on keyword "Telemedicine" and source restricted to "Trade Journals". This has been done to explore the industry acceptance of telemedicine practices.The extracted data is in the form of a bibtex, excel and Rdataframe format. Aggregated corpus information and Lotka curve tabulation has also been provided.

  18. n

    Data of top 50 most cited articles about COVID-19 and the complications of...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • search.dataone.org
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Jan 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tanya Singh; Jagadish Rao Padubidri; Pavanchand Shetty H; Matthew Antony Manoj; Therese Mary; Bhanu Thejaswi Pallempati (2024). Data of top 50 most cited articles about COVID-19 and the complications of COVID-19 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tx95x6b4m
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 10, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore
    Authors
    Tanya Singh; Jagadish Rao Padubidri; Pavanchand Shetty H; Matthew Antony Manoj; Therese Mary; Bhanu Thejaswi Pallempati
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Description

    Background This bibliometric analysis examines the top 50 most-cited articles on COVID-19 complications, offering insights into the multifaceted impact of the virus. Since its emergence in Wuhan in December 2019, COVID-19 has evolved into a global health crisis, with over 770 million confirmed cases and 6.9 million deaths as of September 2023. Initially recognized as a respiratory illness causing pneumonia and ARDS, its diverse complications extend to cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, hematological, neurological, endocrinological, ophthalmological, hepatobiliary, and dermatological systems. Methods Identifying the top 50 articles from a pool of 5940 in Scopus, the analysis spans November 2019 to July 2021, employing terms related to COVID-19 and complications. Rigorous review criteria excluded non-relevant studies, basic science research, and animal models. The authors independently reviewed articles, considering factors like title, citations, publication year, journal, impact factor, authors, study details, and patient demographics. Results The focus is primarily on 2020 publications (96%), with all articles being open-access. Leading journals include The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA, with prominent contributions from Internal Medicine (46.9%) and Pulmonary Medicine (14.5%). China played a major role (34.9%), followed by France and Belgium. Clinical features were the primary study topic (68%), often utilizing retrospective designs (24%). Among 22,477 patients analyzed, 54.8% were male, with the most common age group being 26–65 years (63.2%). Complications affected 13.9% of patients, with a recovery rate of 57.8%. Conclusion Analyzing these top-cited articles offers clinicians and researchers a comprehensive, timely understanding of influential COVID-19 literature. This approach uncovers attributes contributing to high citations and provides authors with valuable insights for crafting impactful research. As a strategic tool, this analysis facilitates staying updated and making meaningful contributions to the dynamic field of COVID-19 research. Methods A bibliometric analysis of the most cited articles about COVID-19 complications was conducted in July 2021 using all journals indexed in Elsevier’s Scopus and Thomas Reuter’s Web of Science from November 1, 2019 to July 1, 2021. All journals were selected for inclusion regardless of country of origin, language, medical speciality, or electronic availability of articles or abstracts. The terms were combined as follows: (“COVID-19” OR “COVID19” OR “SARS-COV-2” OR “SARSCOV2” OR “SARS 2” OR “Novel coronavirus” OR “2019-nCov” OR “Coronavirus”) AND (“Complication” OR “Long Term Complication” OR “Post-Intensive Care Syndrome” OR “Venous Thromboembolism” OR “Acute Kidney Injury” OR “Acute Liver Injury” OR “Post COVID-19 Syndrome” OR “Acute Cardiac Injury” OR “Cardiac Arrest” OR “Stroke” OR “Embolism” OR “Septic Shock” OR “Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation” OR “Secondary Infection” OR “Blood Clots” OR “Cytokine Release Syndrome” OR “Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome” OR “Vaccine Induced Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome” OR “Aspergillosis” OR “Mucormycosis” OR “Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia Anaemia” OR “Immune Thrombocytopenia” OR “Subacute Thyroiditis” OR “Acute Respiratory Failure” OR “Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome” OR “Pneumonia” OR “Subcutaneous Emphysema” OR “Pneumothorax” OR “Pneumomediastinum” OR “Encephalopathy” OR “Pancreatitis” OR “Chronic Fatigue” OR “Rhabdomyolysis” OR “Neurologic Complication” OR “Cardiovascular Complications” OR “Psychiatric Complication” OR “Respiratory Complication” OR “Cardiac Complication” OR “Vascular Complication” OR “Renal Complication” OR “Gastrointestinal Complication” OR “Haematological Complication” OR “Hepatobiliary Complication” OR “Musculoskeletal Complication” OR “Genitourinary Complication” OR “Otorhinolaryngology Complication” OR “Dermatological Complication” OR “Paediatric Complication” OR “Geriatric Complication” OR “Pregnancy Complication”) in the Title, Abstract or Keyword. A total of 5940 articles were accessed, of which the top 50 most cited articles about COVID-19 and Complications of COVID-19 were selected through Scopus. Each article was reviewed for its appropriateness for inclusion. The articles were independently reviewed by three researchers (JRP, MAM and TS) (Table 1). Differences in opinion with regard to article inclusion were resolved by consensus. The inclusion criteria specified articles that were focused on COVID-19 and Complications of COVID-19. Articles were excluded if they did not relate to COVID-19 and or complications of COVID-19, Basic Science Research and studies using animal models or phantoms. Review articles, Viewpoints, Guidelines, Perspectives and Meta-analysis were also excluded from the top 50 most-cited articles (Table 1). The top 50 most-cited articles were compiled in a single database and the relevant data was extracted. The database included: Article Title, Scopus Citations, Year of Publication, Journal, Journal Impact Factor, Authors, Number of Authors, Department Affiliation, Number of Institutions, Country of Origin, Study Topic, Study Design, Sample Size, Open Access, Non-Original Articles, Patient/Participants Age, Gender, Symptoms, Signs, Co-morbidities, Complications, Imaging Modalities Used and outcome.

  19. d

    Publication Dataset of Universal Basic Income (1996-2020)

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Nov 13, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Purnomo, Agung; Asitah, Nur; Prasetyo, Yanu Endar (2023). Publication Dataset of Universal Basic Income (1996-2020) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PUBRWX
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Purnomo, Agung; Asitah, Nur; Prasetyo, Yanu Endar
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1996 - Dec 31, 2020
    Description

    The universal basic income research & publication dataset, which was indexed by Scopus from 1996 to 2020. The dataset contains 272 documents data: authors, authors ID Scopus, title, year, source title, volume, issue, article number in Scopus, DOI, link, affiliation, abstract, index keywords, references, correspondence address, editors, publisher, conference name, conference date, conference code, ISSN, language, document type, access type, and EID.

  20. d

    Replication data for: Citations

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Nov 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lasda Bergman, Elaine (2023). Replication data for: Citations [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/27655
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 21, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Lasda Bergman, Elaine
    Description

    Microsoft Access Database for bibliometric analysis found in the article: Elaine M. Lasda Bergman, Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Volume 38, Issue 6, November 2012, Pages 370-379, ISSN 0099-1333, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913331200119X) Abstract: Past studies of citation coverage of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar do not demonstrate a consistent pattern that can be applied to the interdisciplinary mix of resources used in social work research. To determine the utility of these tools to social work researchers, an analysis of citing references to well-known social work journals was conducted. Web of Science had the fewest citing references and almost no variety in source format. Scopus provided higher citation counts, but the pattern of coverage was similar to Web of Science. Google Scholar provided substantially more citing references, but only a relatively small percentage of them were unique scholarly journal articles. The patterns of database coverage were replicated when the citations were broken out for each journal separately. The results of this analysis demonstrate the need to determine what resources constitute scholarly research and reflect the need for future researchers to consider the merits of each database before undertaking their research. This study will be of interest to scholars in library and information science as well as social work, as it facilitates a greater understanding of the strengths and limitations of each database and brings to light important considerations for conducting future research. Keywords: Citation analysis; Social work; Scopus; Web of Science; Google Scholar

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Piotr Wciślik; Piotr Wciślik; Maciej Maryl; Maciej Maryl; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Lucien Schriber; Lucien Schriber (2020). SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: journal occurrences with ASJC codes [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4034540
Organization logo

Data from: SHAPE-ID Literature Review dataset: journal occurrences with ASJC codes

Related Article
Explore at:
Dataset updated
Sep 18, 2020
Dataset provided by
Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
Authors
Piotr Wciślik; Piotr Wciślik; Maciej Maryl; Maciej Maryl; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Bianca Vienni Baptista; Lucien Schriber; Lucien Schriber
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Background and methodology:

The dataset consists of a list of 2202 journal titles represented in the SHAPE-ID Literature Review bibliography, prepared for the purposes of quantitative analysis.

The list of journals is based on 3955 journal articles in the bibliography dataset that had an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN). To each journal title the project team attributed:

- a weight factor based on how many articles from the given journal featured in bibliography dataset

- at least one All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) code, representing different scientific disciplines

- a country of publication.

In case of 1853 of those journal titles, the attribution was automatised (we matched the ISSNs of journal titles in our sample against the Scopus Sources list from February 2019). In case of the remaining 349 titles the attribution was accomplished manually, based on the information available in SCOPUS, Web of Science, JSTOR, Information Matrix for the Analysis of Journals (MIAR) and ISSN databases.

Description of the file:

This is a csv file containing a list of 2202 journal titles represented in the SHAPE-ID Literature Review bibliography, with country of publication and ASJC codes assigned.

The file is formatted as follows:

Column A: ISSN of the journal

Column B: information on how country and ASJC codes were attributed. Value “N” indicates automatic attribution based on match with Scopus list of sources. Other values indicate manual attribution. Values WOS, SCOPUS, JSTOR indicate source of information. Valu “Y” indicates that information was compiled based on multiple sources.

Column C: numeric values correspond to the weight factor, i.e. number of time articles from each journal featured in the SHAP-ID Literature Review bibliography.

Column D: SHAPE-ID Zotero bibliography identifier.

Column E: Journal title

Column F: The country of publication

Columns G-AD: ASJC codes (numeric and word values) associated with journal entries.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu