Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
etc)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The dataset contains data on publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science until June 1, 2025 on the topic of microbiologically influenced corrosion in industrial cooling water systems, as well as separate data on publications on the topic of microbiologically influenced corrosion in nuclear systems. It also contains data derived from the data collected from the indexes for scientometric analysis and input data that can be used for Scimago Graphica visualization.
What do you look like as a researcher, when someone external to your institute looks you up online? A "Research Footprint" provides a researcher with an immediate and visual overview of their online academic presence. We show what the researcher's metrics look like on the most widely used citation databases: Scopus, Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar. We limit the Research Footprint to the most basic personal metrics: Number of publications, number of open access publications, number of citations, times cited per year, and the h-index. We check whether the researcher has created and maintained the most important author identifiers: ORCID, ScopusID and ResearcherID (Publons), and linked them to our institutional repository based on PURE. We collect all this data as a kicking off point for a 1-on-1 discussion with the researcher. In that discussion we go through the importance of Author Identifiers and check whether all their publications are properly claimed on Scopus, WoS and Google Scholar. Finally, we give them the tools to maintain their profiles on their own to ensure that when external parties look them up, they find an accurate representation of the researcher's publication data. These are the template files we developed at the University of Southern Denmark to generate the Research Footprint. They include a Disclaimer and a GDPR statement. The publication data can be collected in the provided Excel file and then copied over to the Word file.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides data and codes used for a study on Crossref, Web of Science and Scopus journal and publisher coverage, and for OpenAlex, Web of Science and Scopus article and metadata coverage of Health Sciences academic literature. The codes are for performing queries in R programming language.
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
An academic journal or research journal is a periodical publication in which research articles relating to a particular academic discipline is published, according to Wikipedia. Currently, there are more than 25,000 peer-reviewed journals that are indexed in citation index databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. These indexes are ranked on the basis of various metrics such as CiteScore, H-index, etc. The metrics are calculated from yearly citation data of the journal. A lot of efforts are given to make a metric that reflects the journal's quality.
This is a comprehensive dataset on the academic journals coving their metadata information as well as citation, metrics, and ranking information. Detailed data on their subject area is also given in this dataset. The dataset is collected from the following indexing databases: - Scimago Journal Ranking - Scopus - Web of Science Master Journal List
The data is collected by scraping and then it was cleaned, details of which can be found in HERE.
Rest of the features provide further details on the journal's subject area or category: - Life Sciences: Top level subject area. - Social Sciences: Top level subject area. - Physical Sciences: Top level subject area. - Health Sciences: Top level subject area. - 1000 General: ASJC main category. - 1100 Agricultural and Biological Sciences: ASJC main category. - 1200 Arts and Humanities: ASJC main category. - 1300 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: ASJC main category. - 1400 Business, Management and Accounting: ASJC main category. - 1500 Chemical Engineering: ASJC main category. - 1600 Chemistry: ASJC main category. - 1700 Computer Science: ASJC main category. - 1800 Decision Sciences: ASJC main category. - 1900 Earth and Planetary Sciences: ASJC main category. - 2000 Economics, Econometrics and Finance: ASJC main category. - 2100 Energy: ASJC main category. - 2200 Engineering: ASJC main category. - 2300 Environmental Science: ASJC main category. - 2400 Immunology and Microbiology: ASJC main category. - 2500 Materials Science: ASJC main category. - 2600 Mathematics: ASJC main category. - 2700 Medicine: ASJC main category. - 2800 Neuroscience: ASJC main category. - 2900 Nursing: ASJC main category. - 3000 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: ASJC main category. - 3100 Physics and Astronomy: ASJC main category. - 3200 Psychology: ASJC main category. - 3300 Social Sciences: ASJC main category. - 3400 Veterinary: ASJC main category. - 3500 Dentistry: ASJC main category. - 3600 Health Professions: ASJC main category.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Databases Scopus-WoS Meta-Analysis
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A complete list of the selected sources (YouTube videos and blogs)
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
These files represent the exported WoS and Scopus records, used in the output D2.2 Digital transformation of research and innovation roadmap of the Horizont project reSEArch-EU, implemented by the SEA-EU university alliance.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Version: 6
Date of data collection: May 2025 General description: Publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles could be reached publishing a data paper (and/or a software paper) in data journals as well as in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers. File list: - data_articles_journal_list_v6.xlsx: full list of 177 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published - data_articles_journal_list_v6.csv: full list of 177 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published - readme_v6.txt, with a detailed descritption of the dataset and its variables. Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse Type of version of the dataset: final processed version Versions of the files: 6th version - Information updated: number of journals (17 were added and 4 were deleted), URL, document types associated to a specific journal. - Information added: diamond journals were identified.
Version: 5
Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro
Date of data collection: 2023/09/05
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:
- data_articles_journal_list_v5.xlsx: full list of 162 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_v5.csv: full list of 162 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 5th version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal.
163 journals (excel y csv)
Version: 4
Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro
Date of data collection: 2022/12/15
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:
- data_articles_journal_list_v4.xlsx: full list of 140 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_v4.csv: full list of 140 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 4th version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types
- Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and/or Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR), Scopus and Web of Science (WOS), Journal Master List.
Version: 3
Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro
Date of data collection: 2022/10/28
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:
- data_articles_journal_list_v3.xlsx: full list of 124 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_3.csv: full list of 124 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 3rd version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types
- Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and/or Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR).
Erratum - Data articles in journals Version 3:
Botanical Studies -- ISSN 1999-3110 -- JCR (JIF) Q2
Data -- ISSN 2306-5729 -- JCR (JIF) n/a
Data in Brief -- ISSN 2352-3409 -- JCR (JIF) n/a
Version: 2
Author: Francisco Rubio, Universitat Politècnia de València.
Date of data collection: 2020/06/23
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers.
File list:
- data_articles_journal_list_v2.xlsx: full list of 56 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
- data_articles_journal_list_v2.csv: full list of 56 academic journals in which data papers or/and software papers could be published
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 2nd version
- Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types
- Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR)
Total size: 32 KB
Version 1: Description
This dataset contains a list of journals that publish data articles, code, software articles and database articles.
The search strategy in DOAJ and Ulrichsweb was the search for the word data in the title of the journals.
Acknowledgements:
Xaquín Lores Torres for his invaluable help in preparing this dataset.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comparative studies of WoS and Scopus in the past three years.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundThis research aimed to assess the effectiveness of preventive home visits (PHVs) in enhancing resilience and health-related outcomes among older adults living in the community.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in nine databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library. The search was undertaken between March 15 and 31, 2022 with subsequent updates performed on October 15, 2023 and April 10, 2024. This review also included grey literature sourced via Google, Google Scholar and backward citation searches.ResultsOut of 5,621 records, 20 articles were found to meet the inclusion criteria with a total of 8,035 participants involved and the mean age ranged from 74.0 to 84.4 years. Using McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies, we ascertained that the studies included in our analysis had moderate to high levels of quality. In addition to health-related outcomes, PHV interventions were also conducted to evaluate psychological effects (16 studies) and social outcomes (seven studies). Five studies conducted financial assessment to evaluate the costs of health and social care utilisation during PHV interventions. Regarding the results of the review, seven studies showed favourable outcomes, five indicated no effect and eight had equivocal findings. Only one study assessed resilience and determined that PHV had no effect on the resilience of the subjects.ConclusionThis review found that the effectiveness of PHV interventions was uncertain and inconclusive. PHV interventions often prioritise health-related objectives. The incorporation of a holistic approach involving psychosocial health into PHV interventions is relatively uncommon. Due to the paucity of research on resilience as PHV outcome, we are unable to draw a conclusion on the effectiveness of PHV on resilience. Resilience should be prioritised as a psychological assessment in the future development of comprehensive PHV interventions, as it enables older adults to adapt, manage, and respond positively to adversities that may arise with age. Performing financial analysis such as costs and benefits analysis to incorporate the return on investment of PHV interventions is an added value for future research on this topic.Clinical trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42022296919.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Datasets de estudio bibliométrico realizado alrededor de la producción académica publicada en WoS y Scopus, alrededor del concepto Disinformation, Missinformation y Fake News entre los años 2014-2019.
Datasets resultado del Proyecto B0036-1920 financiado por la Universidad Internacional de la Rioja en elmarco de la convocatoria Retos 2019.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Data of investigation published in the article "Ranking by relevance and citation counts, a comparative study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus".
Abstract of the article:
Search engine optimization (SEO) constitutes the set of methods designed to increase the visibility of, and the number of visits to, a web page by means of its ranking on the search engine results pages. Recently, SEO has also been applied to academic databases and search engines, in a trend that is in constant growth. This new approach, known as academic SEO (ASEO), has generated a field of study with considerable future growth potential due to the impact of open science. The study reported here forms part of this new field of analysis. The ranking of results is a key aspect in any information system since it determines the way in which these results are presented to the user. The aim of this study is to analyse and compare the relevance ranking algorithms employed by various academic platforms to identify the importance of citations received in their algorithms. Specifically, we analyse two search engines and two bibliographic databases: Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic, on the one hand, and Web of Science and Scopus, on the other. A reverse engineering methodology is employed based on the statistical analysis of Spearman’s correlation coefficients. The results indicate that the ranking algorithms used by Google Scholar and Microsoft are the two that are most heavily influenced by citations received. Indeed, citation counts are clearly the main SEO factor in these academic search engines. An unexpected finding is that, at certain points in time, WoS used citations received as a key ranking factor, despite the fact that WoS support documents claim this factor does not intervene.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Base de datos de artículos científicos sobre comunicación estratégica en WOS y SCOPUS entre 2019-2023 en castellano e ingles
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Version: 5
Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro
Date of data collection: 2023/09/05
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers. File list:
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 5th version - Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal.
Version: 4
Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro
Date of data collection: 2022/12/15
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers. File list:
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 4th version - Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types - Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and/or Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR), Scopus and Web of Science (WOS), Journal Master List.
Version: 3
Authors: Carlota Balsa-Sánchez, Vanesa Loureiro
Date of data collection: 2022/10/28
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers. File list:
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 3rd version - Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types - Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and/or Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR).
Erratum - Data articles in journals Version 3:
Botanical Studies -- ISSN 1999-3110 -- JCR (JIF) Q2 Data -- ISSN 2306-5729 -- JCR (JIF) n/a Data in Brief -- ISSN 2352-3409 -- JCR (JIF) n/a
Version: 2
Author: Francisco Rubio, Universitat Politècnia de València.
Date of data collection: 2020/06/23
General description: The publication of datasets according to the FAIR principles, could be reached publishing a data paper (or software paper) in data journals or in academic standard journals. The excel and CSV file contains a list of academic journals that publish data papers and software papers. File list:
Relationship between files: both files have the same information. Two different formats are offered to improve reuse
Type of version of the dataset: final processed version
Versions of the files: 2nd version - Information updated: number of journals, URL, document types associated to a specific journal, publishers normalization and simplification of document types - Information added : listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and quartile in Scimago Journal and Country Rank (SJR)
Total size: 32 KB
Version 1: Description
This dataset contains a list of journals that publish data articles, code, software articles and database articles.
The search strategy in DOAJ and Ulrichsweb was the search for the word data in the title of the journals. Acknowledgements: Xaquín Lores Torres for his invaluable help in preparing this dataset.
These are sets of data collected from the manual cross-validation of DOIs (and related research outputs) that are sampled from Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and Microsoft Academic (MSA). For each of the 15 universities, we initially collect all DOIs indexed by each of the three bibliographic sources. Subsequently, we randomly sample 40, 30 and 30 DOIs from sets of DOIs that are exclusively indexed by WoS, Scopus and MSA, respectively, for each university. A manual cross-validation process is then followed to validate certain characteristics across the data sources. This cross-validation process was carried out by a data wrangler, on a part-time basis over a few months, for which online data was accessed from 18 December 2018 to 20 May 2019.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This study examines the relationship between gender and the selection of research topics on Federico García Lorca. We analyze the keywords used by authors in publications indexed in two major bibliographic databases: Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. We construct cognitive maps that identify six key research areas within the scientific literature related to FGL. This study will contribute to expanding the literature on how to analyze the influence of gender in the selection of research topics and the type of knowledge generated.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The .bib data correspond to the full record and cited references of Scopus search. The .txt data correspond to the full reord and cited references of Web of Science (WoS) search. The xlsx is the merged data of both Scopus and WoS
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
20th Jan 2024, Tony Ross-Hellauer & Serge P.J.M Horbach
This spreadsheet contains details of the database searching and assessment of literature for inclusion in the paper "Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review" by Tony Ross-Hellauer and Serge P.J.M Horbach
Description of content of each sheet:
http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licencehttp://reference.data.gov.uk/id/open-government-licence
[This dataset is embargoed until March 30, 2020]. Data from literature search systematically conducted using two widely-used academic databases: Web of Scienceâ ¢ (WoS) and Scopus . Data include the annual amount of KM publication in China and across the world, in WoS, the total amount of knowledge management (KM) publication during the searched years for each country (top 20), in Scopus, the total amount of KM publication during the searched years for each country (top 20), information about the retained KM publication for environmental management in China. The data were generated during the NERC grant 'The transmissive critical zone: understanding the karst hydrology-biogeochemical interface for sustainable management' reference NE/N007425/1 undertaken as part of the NERC Using Critical Zone Science to Understand Sustaining the Ecosystem Service of Soil & Water (CZO) programme. Full details about this dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5285/9bbcbd03-0b6d-409d-9ad1-650c25f5ac73
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
etc)