Search engines, which collect, organize and display knowledge of the internet, are the backbone of the information age and have helped popularize the ad-supported attention economy that prevails throughout the internet. From 2019 to 2024, spending on internet advertising has maintained strong momentum as consumer demand for internet access continued to surge, driven by the adoption of LTE, 5G and unlimited mobile data plans. Despite COVID-19 depressing total advertising expenditure, digital advertising continued to grow as consumers practically lived online while stay-at-home orders were in place. As a result, search engine revenue from advertising is slated to mount at a CAGR of 10.4% to $287.5 billion, including an anticipated hike of 8.4% in 2024, with profit at 18.7%. The search engine industry is fundamentally differentiated from the rest of the economy by its advertising sales framework, market aggregation and high interconnection with other industries. While search is a consumer product, search revenue comes from a platform's desirability to advertisers, not users. Search platforms must balance providing the best search experience while integrating as many advertisements as possible. This difficult balance is challenging to achieve because advertising dollars tend to scale best on the leading search platform, increasing aggregation forces for search providers. The market leaders in search, Google and Microsoft, have met this balance by using advertising revenue to grow a suite of services designed to collect extensive behavior information on and off the search website. This data then targets ads to hyper-specific markets, funding the search business model. As the number of hours spent on the internet continues to mount, search engine revenue is poised to climb at a CAGR of 7.1% to $404.9 billion through the end of 2029. Advertisers will rely increasingly on search engine marketing due to its cost-effectiveness and efficiency advantages over traditional media. With proper analytics software installed, marketers can track which terms, advertisements and websites are the most effective, enabling incremental real-time tweaks and improvements in advertising campaigns. Artificial intelligence has promised to change the purpose of search from navigation to finding answers, which will change the structure of the internet, just as search engine providers have done many times before.

Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data was reported at 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 24 Dec 2024 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Training: Udemy data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Laos – Table LA.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

Google Search Trends: Travel & Accommodations: Lufthansa data was reported at 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Travel & Accommodations: Lufthansa data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 01 Jul 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Travel & Accommodations: Lufthansa data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Burundi – Table BI.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

Dataset Card for "code-search-net-go"

  Dataset Summary

This dataset is the Go portion of the CodeSarchNet annotated with a summary column.The code-search-net dataset includes open source functions that include comments found at GitHub.The summary is a short description of what the function does.

  Languages

The dataset's comments are in English and the functions are coded in Go

  Data Splits

Train, test, validation labels are included in the dataset as… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Nan-Do/code-search-net-go.

China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data was reported at 8.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 8.000 Score for 13 May 2025. China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 70.000 Score in 22 Jan 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 02 May 2025. China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s China – Table CN.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

The goal of this research is to examine direct answers in Google web search engine. Dataset was collected using Senuto (https://www.senuto.com/). Senuto is as an online tool, that extracts data on websites visibility from Google search engine.

Dataset contains the following elements:

keyword,

number of monthly searches,

featured domain,

featured main domain,

featured position,

featured type,

featured url,

content,

content length.

Dataset with visibility structure has 743 798 keywords that were resulting in SERPs with direct answer.

This provides a link to the Washington Secretary of State's Corporations Search tool. The Corporations Data Extract feature is no longer available. Customers needing a list of multiple businesses can use our advanced search to create a list of businesses under specific parameters. You can export this information to an Excel spreadsheet to sort and search more extensively. Below are the steps to perform this type of search. The more specified parameter searches provide narrower search results. Please visit our Corporations and Charities Filing System by following this link https://ccfs.sos.wa.gov/ Scroll down to the “Corporation Search” section and click the “Advanced Search” button on the right. Under the first section, specify how you would like the business name searched. Only use this for single business lookups unless all the businesses you are searching have a common name (use the “contains” selection). Select the appropriate business type from the dropdown if you are looking for a list of a specific business type. For a list of a particular business type with a specific status, select that status under “Business Status.” You can also search by expiration date in this section. Under the “Date of Incorporation/Formation/Registration,” you can search by start or end date. Under the “Registered Agent/Governor Search” section, you can search all businesses with the same registered agent on record or governor listed. Once you have made all your search selections, click the green “Search” button at the bottom right of the page. A list will populate; scroll to the bottom and select the green Excel document icon with CSV. An Excel document should automatically download. If you have popups blocked, please unblock our site, and try again. Once you have opened the downloaded Excel spreadsheet, you can adjust the width of each column and sort the data using the data tab. You can also search by pressing CTRL+F on a Windows keyboard.

The average ad spending per internet user in the 'Search Advertising' segment of the advertising market in the United States was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2030 by in total 274.3 U.S. dollars (+64.2 percent). After the tenth consecutive increasing year, the average ad spending per internet user is estimated to reach 701.5 U.S. dollars and therefore a new peak in 2030. Notably, the average ad spending per internet user of the 'Search Advertising' segment of the advertising market was continuously increasing over the past years.Find further information concerning the average ad spending per internet user in the 'Social Media Advertising' segment of the advertising market in Norway and the ad spending in the 'Search Advertising' segment of the advertising market in Japan. The Statista Market Insights cover a broad range of additional markets.

The Enterprise Search Market is Segmented by Component (Solution [Cognitive Search Platforms, and More], Services [Professional Services, and More]), Search Type (Keyword-Based Search, Conversational / NLP Search, and More), Deployment Mode (On-Premise, Cloud), Enterprise Size (Large Enterprises, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises), Industry Vertical (BFSI Healthcare and Life Sciences, and More), and Geography.

As of January 2024, Google led the search engine market in Indonesia with a 95.16 percent share of the market. In the same year, Bing and Yahoo! followed with minor market shares.

With a market share of more than 74 percent, Google was the most popular desktop search engine in Japan in January 2024. It was followed by Bing, which accounted for more than 15 percent of the desktop search engine market.

Around 96 percent of search engine referrals in Saudi Arabia in December 2024 were through Google. In comparison, 2.83 percent of the referrals in the kingdom in the same period were through Bing.

The primary function of the Livestock and Grain Market News Division of the Livestock and Seed Program (LSP) is to compile and disseminate information that will aid producers, consumers, and distributors in the sale and purchase of livestock, meat, grain, and their related products nationally and internationally.

A table listing published reports of macroinvertebrate richness in agriculturally impacted streams based on a literature search.

Previous studies on supporting free-form keyword queries over RDBMSs provide users with linked-structures (e.g.,a set of joined tuples) that are relevant to a given keyword query. Most of them focus on ranking individual tuples from one table or joins of multiple tables containing a set of keywords. In this paper, we study the problem of keyword search in a data cube with text-rich dimension(s) (so-called text cube). The text cube is built on a multidimensional text database, where each row is associated with some text data (a document) and other structural dimensions (attributes). A cell in the text cube aggregates a set of documents with matching attribute values in a subset of dimensions. We define a keyword-based query language and an IR-style relevance model for coring/ranking cells in the text cube. Given a keyword query, our goal is to find the top-k most relevant cells. We propose four approaches, inverted-index one-scan, document sorted-scan, bottom-up dynamic programming, and search-space ordering. The search-space ordering algorithm explores only a small portion of the text cube for finding the top-k answers, and enables early termination. Extensive experimental studies are conducted to verify the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed approaches. Citation: B. Ding, B. Zhao, C. X. Lin, J. Han, C. Zhai, A. N. Srivastava, and N. C. Oza, “Efficient Keyword-Based Search for Top-K Cells in Text Cube,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2011.

Frequency of publications with SM terms in TI and TIAB of related and unrelated publications in each year.

This dataset contains a collection of around 2,000 HTML pages: these web pages contain the search results obtained in return to queries for different products, searched by a set of synthetic users surfing Google Shopping (US version) from different locations, in July, 2016.

Each file in the collection has a name where there is indicated the location from where the search has been done, the userID, and the searched product: no_email_LOCATION_USERID.PRODUCT.shopping_testing.#.html

The locations are Philippines (PHI), United States (US), India (IN). The userIDs: 26 to 30 for users searching from Philippines, 1 to 5 from US, 11 to 15 from India.

Products have been choice following 130 keywords (e.g., MP3 player, MP4 Watch, Personal organizer, Television, etc.).

In the following, we describe how the search results have been collected.

Each user has a fresh profile. The creation of a new profile corresponds to launch a new, isolated, web browser client instance and open the Google Shopping US web page.

To mimic real users, the synthetic users can browse, scroll pages, stay on a page, and click on links.

A fully-fledged web browser is used to get the correct desktop version of the website under investigation. This is because websites could be designed to behave according to user agents, as witnessed by the differences between the mobile and desktop versions of the same website.

The prices are the retail ones displayed by Google Shopping in US dollars (thus, excluding shipping fees).

Several frameworks have been proposed for interacting with web browsers and analysing results from search engines. This research adopts OpenWPM. OpenWPM is automatised with Selenium to efficiently create and manage different users with isolated Firefox and Chrome client instances, each of them with their own associated cookies.

The experiments run, on average, 24 hours. In each of them, the software runs on our local server, but the browser's traffic is redirected to the designated remote servers (i.e., to India), via tunneling in SOCKS proxies. This way, all commands are simultaneously distributed over all proxies. The experiments adopt the Mozilla Firefox browser (version 45.0) for the web browsing tasks and run under Ubuntu 14.04. Also, for each query, we consider the first page of results, counting 40 products. Among them, the focus of the experiments is mostly on the top 10 and top 3 results.

Due to connection errors, one of the Philippine profiles have no associated results. Also, for Philippines, a few keywords did not lead to any results: videocassette recorders, totes, umbrellas. Similarly, for US, no results were for totes and umbrellas.

The search results have been analyzed in order to check if there were evidence of price steering, based on users' location.

One term of usage applies:

In any research product whose findings are based on this dataset, please cite

@inproceedings{DBLP:conf/ircdl/CozzaHPN19,
 author  = {Vittoria Cozza and
        Van Tien Hoang and
        Marinella Petrocchi and
        Rocco {De Nicola}},
 title   = {Transparency in Keyword Faceted Search: An Investigation on Google
        Shopping},
 booktitle = {Digital Libraries: Supporting Open Science - 15th Italian Research
        Conference on Digital Libraries, {IRCDL} 2019, Pisa, Italy, January
        31 - February 1, 2019, Proceedings},
 pages   = {29--43},
 year   = {2019},
 crossref = {DBLP:conf/ircdl/2019},
 url    = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4\_3},
 doi    = {10.1007/978-3-030-11226-4\_3},
 timestamp = {Fri, 18 Jan 2019 23:22:50 +0100},
 biburl  = {https://dblp.org/rec/bib/conf/ircdl/CozzaHPN19},
 bibsource = {dblp computer science bibliography, https://dblp.org}
}

Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: eBay data was reported at 28.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 28.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: eBay data is updated daily, averaging 29.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 84.000 Score in 22 Oct 2022 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 Feb 2023. Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: eBay data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s France – Table FR.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.

According to an April 2024 survey, one-quarter of adults in the United States preferred to use social media as their primary choice for online search. Within different generations, Gen Z showed the highest interest in using social platforms over search engines to find information online, with around 46 percent of those respondents stating they preferred this method.

Dataset Details

  Dataset Description

This dataset is a refined subset of the "Natural Questions" dataset, filtered to include only high-quality answers as labeled manually. The dataset includes ground truth examples of "good" answers, defined as responses that are correct, clear, and sufficient for the given questions. Additionally, answers generated by three AI search engines (Perplexity, Gemini, Exa AI) have been incorporated to provide both raw and parsed outputs for… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/quotientai/natural-qa-random-67-with-AI-search-answers.