The Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) Complete Count Data include more than 650 million individual-level and 7.5 million household-level records. The microdata are the result of collaboration between IPUMS and the nation’s two largest genealogical organizations—Ancestry.com and FamilySearch—and provides the largest and richest source of individual level and household data.
All manuscripts (and other items you'd like to publish) must be submitted to
phsdatacore@stanford.edu for approval prior to journal submission.
We will check your cell sizes and citations.
For more information about how to cite PHS and PHS datasets, please visit:
https:/phsdocs.developerhub.io/need-help/citing-phs-data-core
This dataset was created on 2020-01-10 22:52:11.461
by merging multiple datasets together. The source datasets for this version were:
IPUMS 1930 households: This dataset includes all households from the 1930 US census.
IPUMS 1930 persons: This dataset includes all individuals from the 1930 US census.
IPUMS 1930 Lookup: This dataset includes variable names, variable labels, variable values, and corresponding variable value labels for the IPUMS 1930 datasets.
Historic data are scarce and often only exists in aggregate tables. The key advantage of historic US census data is the availability of individual and household level characteristics that researchers can tabulate in ways that benefits their specific research questions. The data contain demographic variables, economic variables, migration variables and family variables. Within households, it is possible to create relational data as all relations between household members are known. For example, having data on the mother and her children in a household enables researchers to calculate the mother’s age at birth. Another advantage of the Complete Count data is the possibility to follow individuals over time using a historical identifier.
In sum: the historic US census data are a unique source for research on social and economic change and can provide population health researchers with information about social and economic determinants.Historic data are scarce and often only exists in aggregate tables. The key advantage of historic US census data is the availability of individual and household level characteristics that researchers can tabulate in ways that benefits their specific research questions. The data contain demographic variables, economic variables, migration variables and family variables. Within households, it is possible to create relational data as all relations between household members are known. For example, having data on the mother and her children in a household enables researchers to calculate the mother’s age at birth. Another advantage of the Complete Count data is the possibility to follow individuals over time using a historical identifier. In sum: the historic US census data are a unique source for research on social and economic change and can provide population health researchers with information about social and economic determinants.
The historic US 1930 census data was collected in April 1930. Enumerators collected data traveling to households and counting the residents who regularly slept at the household. Individuals lacking permanent housing were counted as residents of the place where they were when the data was collected. Household members absent on the day of data collected were either listed to the household with the help of other household members or were scheduled for the last census subdivision.
Notes
We provide IPUMS household and person data separately so that it is convenient to explore the descriptive statistics on each level. In order to obtain a full dataset, merge the household and person on the variables SERIAL and SERIALP. In order to create a longitudinal dataset, merge datasets on the variable HISTID.
Households with more than 60 people in the original data were broken up for processing purposes. Every person in the large households are considered to be in their own household. The original large households can be identified using the variable SPLIT, reconstructed using the variable SPLITHID, and the original count is found in the variable SPLITNUM.
Coded variables derived from string variables are still in progress. These variables include: occupation and industry.
Missing observations have been allocated and some inconsistencies have been edited for the following variables: SPEAKENG, YRIMMIG, CITIZEN, AGEMARR, AGE, BPL, MBPL, FBPL, LIT, SCHOOL, OWNERSHP, FARM, EMPSTAT, OCC1950, IND1950, MTONGUE, MARST, RACE, SEX, RELATE, CLASSWKR. The flag variables indicating an allocated observation for the associated variables can be included in your extract by clicking the ‘Select data quality flags’ box on the extract summary page.
Most inconsistent information was not edite
This dataset includes variable names, variable labels, variable values, and corresponding variable value labels for the IPUMS 1930 datasets.
This dataset includes all households from the 1930 US census.
This dataset includes all individuals from the 1930 US census.
This crosswalk consists of individuals matched between the 1860 and 1930 complete-count US Censuses. Within the crosswalk, users have the option to select the linking method with which these matches were created. This version of the crosswalk contains links made by the ABE-exact (conservative and standard) method, the ABE-NYSIIS (conservative and standard) method and the ABE-NYSIIS (conservative and standard) method where race is used as a matching variable. For any chosen method, users can merge into this crosswalk a wide set of individual- and household-level variables provided publicly by IPUMS, thereby creating a historical longitudinal dataset for analysis.
This crosswalk consists of individuals matched between the 1920 and 1930 complete-count US Censuses. Within the crosswalk, users have the option to select the linking method with which these matches were created. This version of the crosswalk contains links made by the ABE-exact (conservative and standard) method, the ABE-NYSIIS (conservative and standard) method and the ABE-NYSIIS (conservative and standard) method where race is used as a matching variable. For any chosen method, users can merge into this crosswalk a wide set of individual- and household-level variables provided publicly by IPUMS, thereby creating a historical longitudinal dataset for analysis.
Block-level census coverage of early Central Phoenix for 1920, 1930, and 1940, including population, race/ethnicity, household ownership and rentership, and temporary residency. This dataset was designed for use in combination with parcel-level land-use data derived from Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps to assess environmental justice issues in Phoenix’s early 20th Century development.
In 1800, the region of present-day Switzerland had a population of approximately 1.8 million people. This figure would grow steadily throughout the 19th century, as political and religious grievances gave way to a united federation, whose economic policies saw Switzerland emerge as one of Europe's most prosperous and stable countries. Growth boomed between 1890 and 1910, as industrialization would see significant economic growth and migration to the country. While Switzerland’s neutrality in both World Wars would prevent the mass fatalities experienced across the rest of Europe during the early 20th century, Switzerland’s population would nevertheless stagnate in both the First and Second World War and in the Great Depression in the 1930s, as the economic turmoil and conflict abroad would halt the migration that had previously driven population growth.
Following the end of the Second World War, growth would resume and would rise steadily until the late 1970s, before an economic recession saw the population fall again as workers migrated in search of employment elsewhere. However, population growth has steadily risen since the 1980s, reaching seven million in the mid-1990s and eight million in 2012. Today, with a population of 8.7 million, Switzerland is ranked among the wealthiest and most developed nations in the world, with very high standards of living.
This Stata script graphs the proportion of the national population living in central cities and suburbs each decade from 1930 through 2010.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Dit deel betreft de bestanden van de provincie Gelderland.De bestanden zijn geordend in de mappenstructuur Bedrijfsklasse\Bedrijfsgroep.De metadata per bestand (File properties) bevat informatie over het Economisch Geografisch Gebied (EGG) alsmede het bandnummer. Het bestand Inventaris.pdf geeft een overzicht van Gemeenten per bandnummer.
https://search.gesis.org/research_data/datasearch-httpwww-da-ra-deoaip--oaioai-da-ra-de451385https://search.gesis.org/research_data/datasearch-httpwww-da-ra-deoaip--oaioai-da-ra-de451385
Abstract (en): This collection includes county-level data from the United States Censuses of Agriculture for the years 1840 to 2012. The files provide data about the number, types, output, and prices of various agricultural products, as well as information on the amount, expenses, sales, values, and production of machinery. Most of the basic crop output data apply to the previous harvest year. Data collected also included the population and value of livestock, the number of animals slaughtered, and the size, type, and value of farms. Part 46 of this collection contains data from 1980 through 2010. Variables in part 46 include information such as the average value of farmland, number and value of buildings per acre, food services, resident population, composition of households, and unemployment rates. ICPSR data undergo a confidentiality review and are altered when necessary to limit the risk of disclosure. ICPSR also routinely creates ready-to-go data files along with setups in the major statistical software formats as well as standard codebooks to accompany the data. In addition to these procedures, ICPSR performed the following processing steps for this data collection: Checked for undocumented or out-of-range codes.. Response Rates: Not applicable. Datasets:DS0: Study-Level FilesDS1: Farm Land Value Data Set (County and State) 1850-1959DS2: 1840 County and StateDS3: 1850 County and StateDS4: 1860 County and StateDS5: 1870 County and StateDS6: 1880 County and StateDS7: 1890 County and StateDS8: 1900 County and StateDS9: 1910 County and StateDS10: 1920 County and State, Dataset 1DS11: 1920 County and State, Dataset 2DS12: 1925 County and StateDS13: 1930 County and State, Dataset 1DS14: 1930 County and State, Dataset 2DS15: 1935 County and StateDS16: 1940 County and State, Dataset 1DS17: 1940 County and State, Dataset 2DS18: 1940 County and State, Dataset 3DS19: 1940 County and State, Dataset 4 (Water)DS20: 1945 County and StateDS21: 1950 County and State, Dataset 1DS22: 1950 Crops, County and State, Dataset 2DS23: 1950 County, Dataset 3DS24: 1950 County and State, Dataset 4DS25: 1954 County and State, Dataset 1DS26: 1954 Crops, County and State, Dataset 2DS27: 1959 County and State, Dataset 1DS28: 1959 Crops, County and State, Dataset 2DS29: 1959 County, Dataset 3DS30: 1964 Dataset 1DS31: 1964 Crops, County and State, Dataset 2DS32: 1964 County, Dataset 3DS33: 1969 All Farms, County and State, Dataset 1DS34: 1969 Farms 2500, County and State, Dataset 2DS35: 1969 Crops, County and State, Dataset 3DS36: 1974 All Farms, County and State, Dataset 1DS37: 1974 Farms 2500, County and State, Dataset 2DS38: 1974 Crops, County and State, Dataset 3DS39: 1978 County and StateDS40: 1982 County and StateDS41: 1987 County and StateDS42: 1992 County and StateDS43: 1997 County and StateDS44: 2002 County and StateDS45: 2007 County and StateDS46: State and County Data, United States, 1980-2010DS47: 2012 County and State Farms within United States counties and states. Smallest Geographic Unit: FIPS code The sample was the universe of agricultural operating units. For 1969-2007, data were taken from computer files from the Census Bureau and the United States Department of Agriculture. 2018-08-20 The P.I. resupplied data and documentation for 1935 County and State (dataset 15) and 1997 County and State (dataset 43). Additionally, documentation updates and variable label revisions have been incorporated in datasets 22, 26, 28, 31, 35, and 38 at the request of the P.I.2016-06-29 The data and documentation for 2012 County and State (data set 47) have been added to this collection. The collection and documentation titles have been updated to reflect the new year.2015-08-05 The data, setup files, and documentation for 1964 Dataset 1 have been updated to reflect changes from the producer. Funding insitution(s): National Science Foundation (NSF-SES-0921732; 0648045). United States Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health (R01 HD057929).
In 1800, the population of Luxembourg was estimated to be 127,000, a figure which would rise steadily through the early 19 th century as the country would become an increasingly prominent city in the region. Luxembourg’s population would see its first major period of growth following the defeat of Napoleon in 1815, which would result in the previously-French occupied Luxembourg being granted formal autonomy in the subsequent Congress of Vienna. As a largely agrarian state at this time, the population of Luxembourg would see several periods of growth and decline throughout the remainder of the 20th century, as many residents emigrated abroad to countries such as the United States in search of work. Nevertheless, the population of Luxembourg would rise to over 235,000 by the turn of the century, as Dutch modernization and the removal of the city’s fortifications in the 1867 Treaty of London would allow for a greater expansion of the city proper.
The first half of the 20 th century would largely be a period of stagnation for the country, as the country would see large periods of stagnation in the 1910s and throughout the 1930s and 1940s, as occupation in both World Wars and the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic) would see massive damage to the city in both human and economic terms. Luxembourg’s population would see significant growth in the country’s population, particularly so following the creation of the European Union in 1958 (Luxembourg was one of the six founding members of the union). Growth would accelerate even further following the 1980s, as increases in industrialization and accompanying economic growth would lead to an increasingly growing immigrant population from other EU nations in Luxembourg, which by 2015 would account for nearly half the citizens in Luxembourg. As a result of this growth, in 2020, Luxembourg is estimated to have a population of 626,000.
In 1800, the population of the area of modern-day Bangladesh was estimated to be just over 19 million, a figure which would rise steadily throughout the 19th century, reaching over 26 million by 1900. At the time, Bangladesh was the eastern part of the Bengal region in the British Raj, and had the most-concentrated Muslim population in the subcontinent's east. At the turn of the 20th century, the British colonial administration believed that east Bengal was economically lagging behind the west, and Bengal was partitioned in 1905 as a means of improving the region's development. East Bengal then became the only Muslim-majority state in the eastern Raj, which led to socioeconomic tensions between the Hindu upper classes and the general population. Bengal Famine During the Second World War, over 2.5 million men from across the British Raj enlisted in the British Army and their involvement was fundamental to the war effort. The war, however, had devastating consequences for the Bengal region, as the famine of 1943-1944 resulted in the deaths of up to three million people (with over two thirds thought to have been in the east) due to starvation and malnutrition-related disease. As the population boomed in the 1930s, East Bengal's mismanaged and underdeveloped agricultural sector could not sustain this growth; by 1942, food shortages spread across the region, millions began migrating in search of food and work, and colonial mismanagement exacerbated this further. On the brink of famine in early-1943, authorities in India called for aid and permission to redirect their own resources from the war effort to combat the famine, however these were mostly rejected by authorities in London. While the exact extent of each of these factors on causing the famine remains a topic of debate, the general consensus is that the British War Cabinet's refusal to send food or aid was the most decisive. Food shortages did not dissipate until late 1943, however famine deaths persisted for another year. Partition to independence Following the war, the movement for Indian independence reached its final stages as the process of British decolonization began. Unrest between the Raj's Muslim and Hindu populations led to the creation of two separate states in1947; the Muslim-majority regions became East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and West Pakistan (now Pakistan), separated by the Hindu-majority India. Although East Pakistan's population was larger, power lay with the military in the west, and authorities grew increasingly suppressive and neglectful of the eastern province in the following years. This reached a tipping point when authorities failed to respond adequately to the Bhola cyclone in 1970, which claimed over half a million lives in the Bengal region, and again when they failed to respect the results of the 1970 election, in which the Bengal party Awami League won the majority of seats. Bangladeshi independence was claimed the following March, leading to a brutal war between East and West Pakistan that claimed between 1.5 and three million deaths in just nine months. The war also saw over half of the country displaced, widespread atrocities, and the systematic rape of hundreds of thousands of women. As the war spilled over into India, their forces joined on the side of Bangladesh, and Pakistan was defeated two weeks later. An additional famine in 1974 claimed the lives of several hundred thousand people, meaning that the early 1970s was one of the most devastating periods in the country's history. Independent Bangladesh In the first decades of independence, Bangladesh's political hierarchy was particularly unstable and two of its presidents were assassinated in military coups. Since transitioning to parliamentary democracy in the 1990s, things have become comparatively stable, although political turmoil, violence, and corruption are persistent challenges. As Bangladesh continues to modernize and industrialize, living standards have increased and individual wealth has risen. Service industries have emerged to facilitate the demands of Bangladesh's developing economy, while manufacturing industries, particularly textiles, remain strong. Declining fertility rates have seen natural population growth fall in recent years, although the influx of Myanmar's Rohingya population due to the displacement crisis has seen upwards of one million refugees arrive in the country since 2017. In 2020, it is estimated that Bangladesh has a population of approximately 165 million people.
【対象期間】昭和5年10月1日国勢調査【注】(関東州及満鉄附属地、南洋委任統治区域ヲ含マズ)【計数出所】内閣統計局調査 / PERIOD: Population census on Oct. 1, 1930. NOTE: (Excluding Kwantung Province and South Manchuria Railway Zone, and, South Pacific Mandate). SOURCE: [Survey by the Statistics Bureau, Imperial Cabinet]. / 公的統計: 集計データ、統計表 / official statistics: aggregate data / 集計 / Aggregation / Keywords: 人口センサス, 雇用, 統計, 経済, Statistics, Economics, Censuses, Employment, 人口, 労働力, Population, Labour Force【リソース】Fulltext
【対象期間】昭和5年10月1日国勢調査【注】【計数出所】内閣統計局調査 / PERIOD: Population census on Oct. 1, 1930. SOURCE: [Survey by the Statistics Bureau, Imperial Cabinet]. / 公的統計: 集計データ、統計表 / official statistics: aggregate data / 集計 / Aggregation / Keywords: 人口センサス, 家族生活と結婚, 統計, 経済, Statistics, Economics, Censuses, Family life and marriage, 人口, 世帯, Population, Households【リソース】Fulltext
【対象期間】昭和5年10月1日国勢調査【注】【計数出所】内閣統計局調査 / PERIOD: Population census on Oct. 1, 1930. SOURCE: [Survey by the Statistics Bureau, Imperial Cabinet]. / 公的統計: 集計データ、統計表 / official statistics: aggregate data / 集計 / Aggregation / Keywords: 人口センサス, 統計, 経済, Statistics, Economics, Censuses, 人口, Population【リソース】Fulltext
【対象期間】昭和5年10月1日国勢調査【注】【計数出所】内閣統計局調査 / PERIOD: Population census on Oct. 1, 1930. SOURCE: [Survey by the Statistics Bureau, Imperial Cabinet]. / 公的統計: 集計データ、統計表 / official statistics: aggregate data / 集計 / Aggregation / Keywords: 人口センサス, 家族生活と結婚, 統計, 経済, Statistics, Economics, Censuses, Family life and marriage, 人口, 世帯, Population, Households【リソース】Fulltext
【対象期間】昭和5年10月1日国勢調査【注】【計数出所】内閣統計局調査【利用上の注意】統計年鑑は刊行当時の数値を掲載し、その後、原資料で数値の更新・修正等があっても反映していない。 / PERIOD: Population census on Oct. 1, 1930. SOURCE: [Survey by the Statistics Bureau, Imperial Cabinet]. NOTE FOR USE: The Statistical Yearbook contains the figures at the time of publication, and does not reflect any subsequent updates or revisions to the figures. / 公的統計: 集計データ、統計表 / official statistics: aggregate data / 集計 / Aggregation / Keywords: 人口センサス, 家族生活と結婚, 統計, 経済, Statistics, Economics, Censuses, Family life and marriage, 人口, 世帯, Population, Households【リソース】Fulltext
【対象期間】昭和5年10月1日国勢調査【注】【計数出所】内閣統計局調査 / PERIOD: Population census on Oct. 1, 1930. SOURCE: [Survey by the Statistics Bureau, Imperial Cabinet]. / 公的統計: 集計データ、統計表 / official statistics: aggregate data / 集計 / Aggregation / Keywords: 人口センサス, 統計, 経済, Statistics, Economics, Censuses, 人口, Population【リソース】Fulltext
【対象期間】昭和5年10月1日国勢調査【注】【計数出所】内閣統計局調査 / PERIOD: Population census on Oct. 1, 1930. SOURCE: [Survey by the Statistics Bureau, Imperial Cabinet]. / 公的統計: 集計データ、統計表 / official statistics: aggregate data / 集計 / Aggregation / Keywords: 人口センサス, 雇用, 統計, 経済, Statistics, Economics, Censuses, Employment, 人口, 労働力, Population, Labour Force【リソース】Fulltext
The Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) Complete Count Data include more than 650 million individual-level and 7.5 million household-level records. The microdata are the result of collaboration between IPUMS and the nation’s two largest genealogical organizations—Ancestry.com and FamilySearch—and provides the largest and richest source of individual level and household data.
All manuscripts (and other items you'd like to publish) must be submitted to
phsdatacore@stanford.edu for approval prior to journal submission.
We will check your cell sizes and citations.
For more information about how to cite PHS and PHS datasets, please visit:
https:/phsdocs.developerhub.io/need-help/citing-phs-data-core
This dataset was created on 2020-01-10 22:52:11.461
by merging multiple datasets together. The source datasets for this version were:
IPUMS 1930 households: This dataset includes all households from the 1930 US census.
IPUMS 1930 persons: This dataset includes all individuals from the 1930 US census.
IPUMS 1930 Lookup: This dataset includes variable names, variable labels, variable values, and corresponding variable value labels for the IPUMS 1930 datasets.
Historic data are scarce and often only exists in aggregate tables. The key advantage of historic US census data is the availability of individual and household level characteristics that researchers can tabulate in ways that benefits their specific research questions. The data contain demographic variables, economic variables, migration variables and family variables. Within households, it is possible to create relational data as all relations between household members are known. For example, having data on the mother and her children in a household enables researchers to calculate the mother’s age at birth. Another advantage of the Complete Count data is the possibility to follow individuals over time using a historical identifier.
In sum: the historic US census data are a unique source for research on social and economic change and can provide population health researchers with information about social and economic determinants.Historic data are scarce and often only exists in aggregate tables. The key advantage of historic US census data is the availability of individual and household level characteristics that researchers can tabulate in ways that benefits their specific research questions. The data contain demographic variables, economic variables, migration variables and family variables. Within households, it is possible to create relational data as all relations between household members are known. For example, having data on the mother and her children in a household enables researchers to calculate the mother’s age at birth. Another advantage of the Complete Count data is the possibility to follow individuals over time using a historical identifier. In sum: the historic US census data are a unique source for research on social and economic change and can provide population health researchers with information about social and economic determinants.
The historic US 1930 census data was collected in April 1930. Enumerators collected data traveling to households and counting the residents who regularly slept at the household. Individuals lacking permanent housing were counted as residents of the place where they were when the data was collected. Household members absent on the day of data collected were either listed to the household with the help of other household members or were scheduled for the last census subdivision.
Notes
We provide IPUMS household and person data separately so that it is convenient to explore the descriptive statistics on each level. In order to obtain a full dataset, merge the household and person on the variables SERIAL and SERIALP. In order to create a longitudinal dataset, merge datasets on the variable HISTID.
Households with more than 60 people in the original data were broken up for processing purposes. Every person in the large households are considered to be in their own household. The original large households can be identified using the variable SPLIT, reconstructed using the variable SPLITHID, and the original count is found in the variable SPLITNUM.
Coded variables derived from string variables are still in progress. These variables include: occupation and industry.
Missing observations have been allocated and some inconsistencies have been edited for the following variables: SPEAKENG, YRIMMIG, CITIZEN, AGEMARR, AGE, BPL, MBPL, FBPL, LIT, SCHOOL, OWNERSHP, FARM, EMPSTAT, OCC1950, IND1950, MTONGUE, MARST, RACE, SEX, RELATE, CLASSWKR. The flag variables indicating an allocated observation for the associated variables can be included in your extract by clicking the ‘Select data quality flags’ box on the extract summary page.
Most inconsistent information was not edite