Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant or contaminant. This dataset shows the locations of sites, facilities and properties that have been contaminated by hazardous materials and are being, or have been, cleaned up under EPA Brownfields cleanup programs.

Abstract: Brownfields are defined by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) as abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated by real or perceived environmental contamination. The primary goals of Florida's Brownfields Redevelopment Act (Ch. 97-277, Laws of Florida, codified at ss. 376.77-.85, F.S.) are to reduce health and environmental hazards on existing commercial and industrial sites that are abandoned or underused due to these hazards and create financial and regulatory incentives to encourage redevelopment and voluntary cleanup of contaminated properties. A 'brownfield area' means a contiguous area of one or more brownfield sites, some of which may not be contaminated, that has been designated as such by a local government resolution. Such areas may include all or portions of community redevelopment areas, enterprise zones, empowerment zones, other such designated economically deprived communities and areas, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designated brownfield pilot projects. This layer provides a polygon representation of the boundaries of these designated Brownfield Areas in Volusia County. The data presented here is an extract of the the FDEP statewide Brownfield Areas shapefile and contains only areas within Volusia County.Purpose: Brownfields data is provided to assist in the determination of areas with potential for economic revitalization.Accuracy: This layer provides a polygon representation of the boundaries of designated Brownfield Areas within Florida where a resolution has been passed by a local municipality. These polygons were created using various methodologies for creating digital spatial data depending upon the type of information provided by the municipality within the resolution and loosely dependent upon the cadastral (parcel) boundaries provided by the County Property Appraisers at the time when the spatial boundaries were developed. Since the data quality of the cadastral layer varies from county to county, the data quality of the brownfield area polygons will also vary. These methodologies include the following list: Coordinate Geometry (COGO) created from legal descriptions of the area specified in the resolution. Many of the brownfields include a large area with hundreds of property parcels. These boundaries were compared with the most recent cadastral boundaries available from the County Property Appraiser and spatially adjusted where necessary to clearly include the property parcels marked for redevelopment, the roadway right of way areas (where applicable), city boundaries, political boundaries, and other economic incentive zones. Shapefiles, Coverages and CADD files of the area were provided by the local municipality or planning and development agencies in some cases. These shapefiles were used without modification to the geometry to match cadastral boundaries. Coverages and CADD files were converted to a format compatible with the process software. Paper Maps showing the scaled boundaries of the area in relation to property parcels, geographic landmarks, and land surveys are sometimes included in the resolution. These maps are compared to available GIS boundaries in order to locate the specific property parcels referenced. The available cadastral boundaries are used to represent the area where only paper maps or parcel folio numbers are provided.All inquiries concerning this data should be directed to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) OTIS/GIS Section. GIS.Librarian@dep.state.fl.usOnline linkage to the Original Metadata

Point locations and corresponding parcels for Brownfields within Indiana provided by personnel of Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Land Quality (IDEM, OLQ). Attributes include status (active, inactive), identification numbers (IDEM), site names, address information, and status comments from IDEM personnel.Indiana defines a brownfield site as a parcel of real estate that is abandoned or inactive; or may not be operated at its appropriate use; and on which expansion, redevelopment, or reuse is complicated; because of the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, a contaminant, petroleum, or a petroleum product that poses a risk to human health and the environment.As our undeveloped land continues to disappear, we recognize the need to redevelop and reuse land that may have viable buildings and infrastructure already present. The existence of buildings and infrastructure, and access to transportation resources can lower the costs to a potential developer. Redevelopment of brownfields properties benefits communities by rejuvenating vacant buildings, increasing the tax base and reducing blight. Because the potential environmental liability at these properties is unknown, prospective purchasers are unwilling to assume the risk of undetermined potential cleanup costs. Thus, the properties remain idle. In response to these issues the IDEM, in conjunction with the Indiana Development Finance Authority and the Indiana Department of Commerce offers financial assistance in the form of grants and low-interest loans for site assessment, remediation, and demolition. The IDEM provides assistance by performing technical oversight and review.

Parcels are not currently populated for this sub-layer. You can find and overlay all state parcels with Brownfields sites by using https://www.indianamap.org/datasets/INMap::parcel-boundaries-of-indiana-current/about.

This is a dataset of the London Borough of Barnet's Brownfield Land Register The Town and Country Planning (Brownfield Land Register) Regulations 2017 require local planning authorities to maintain a register of their brownfield sites that are suitable for housing. The London Borough of Barnet Strategic Planning Committee signed off the 2022 Brownfield Land Register on 13 June 2023. Brownfield Land Register.pdf (moderngov.co.uk) Appendix 1 - BLR 2022.pdf (moderngov.co.uk) Part 1 lists brownfield land sites of at least 0.25ha or capable of providing 5 or more dwellings that are considered suitable for housing led development. Sites listed in Part 2 of the register will have been granted Permission in Principle. Local Planning Authorities are required to review registers at least once a year. Further information from the DCLG on Brownfield Land Registers is provided here Barnet is one of the Local Planning Authorities that received Government funding to improve their planning services through the Local Digital Fund. This aims to digitise Planning to make land and housing data easier to find, understand, use and trust. This data is also available on View planning and housing datasets with geographic location data on an interactive map here. Map of planning data for England | Planning Data This dataset has been published by the London Borough of Barnet under the Open Government Licence (OGL) (v3). Please acknowledge the Information Provider through the following attribution statement: © London Borough of Barnet, 2017, OGL, v3.0 Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right, 2017

City of Houston Brownsfields Polygons converted from the Addresses.

© City of Houston PWE Planning; EGIS This layer is sourced from mycity.houstontx.gov.

Update Frequency: Quarterly or as needed

Current owners of these sites have not paid their property taxes for one or more years. Based on at least an initial screening of these properties (including a historical land use check and a site visit), the City has decided not to foreclose because of potential environmental contamination. However, the City (using State Statute 75.106) may begin foreclosure, and then assign the foreclosure judgment to a new party that will remediate and redevelop the site. Testing may demonstrate that the site is clean or needs limited environmental clean-up.

DCD maintains a list of these sites. If you find a property of interest on this list, check Map Milwaukee at city.milwaukee.gov for a map of the area around the property and check http://assessments.milwaukee.gov/default.asp to view more information about the property.

To download XML and JSON files, click the CSV option below and click the down arrow next to the Download button in the upper right on its page.

This feature service is for viewing Brownfields projects content and is updated continuously. This data set shows point locations of Brownfields Projects that have entered into the program to receive a Brownfields Agreement. The marker points shown reflect the current status of the project in its progression towards having a recorded Notice of Brownfields Property with a finalized Brownfields Agreement. Additional web links are also provided to view corresponding online project documentation and to download compliance forms.

Data to create the List of Contaminated or Potentially Contaminated Sites - Remediation Division is from historical program information or from new program applications and filings. More information regarding the generation of this list can be found at: https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Remediation--Site-Clean-Up/List-of-Contaminated-or-Potentially-Contaminated-Sites-in-Connecticut A seperate dataset is published for: List of Contaminated Sites or Potentially Contaminated - SASU Case Management System and provide a list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites. The two database systems are maintained by different Divisions within the agency. There may be sites in both databases due to an overlap in responsibilities of the two Divisions. https://data.ct.gov/Environment-and-Natural-Resources/List-of-Contaminated-or-Potentially-Contaminated-S/77ya-7twa The data is updated when documents are received for responsible parties conducting site remediation. For more information regarding the individual remedial programs visit: https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Remediation--Site-Clean-Up/Remediation-Site-Clean-Up Those seeking additional information about information contained in this dataset may use the DEEP FOIA Process: https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/About/FOIA-Requests Each Row represents a Remediation project (Property Transfer, Brownfield, Enforcement, Federal Remediation, State Remediation, Landfill Monitoring, RCRA Corrective Action, and Voluntary). Data to compile the list was gathered for each site from information provided to DEEP for requirements within each program. Sites may be in multiple Remediation programs and therefore may be listed more than once. Some sites have been fully cleaned up while others have limited information about the environmental conditions. The list includes only sites that been reported to DEEP or EPA. Additional information for site within the Hazard Notification program can be found at: https://portal.ct.gov/DEEP/Remediation--Site-Clean-Up/Significant-Environmental-Hazard-Program/List-of-Significant-Environmental-Hazards Significant Environmental Hazard Sites GIS Map: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/9c100aa21fbe4ee180df9942d000f676 Details on columns which reference ELUR: Environmental Land Use Restriction (ELUR) or Notice and Use Limitation (NAUL) are used to minimize the risk of human exposure to pollutants and hazards to the environment by preventing specific uses or activities at a property or a portion of a property. Link to GIS map of ELUR and restriction type: https://ctdeep.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=d37eccb2a5c3491d8f0d389a96d9a912 There may be errors in the data although we strive to minimize them. Examples of errors may include: misspelled or incomplete addresses and/or missing data.

Regulation 4 of the Town and Country Planning (Brownfield Land Register) Regulations 2017 requires local Planning Authorities to publish brownfield land registers identifying land suitable for residential and mixed-use developments.

The Mayor is working with the London Planning Authorities to collate their individual registers as part of his commitment to using data and technology to make London an even better place to live, work and visit. They are not required to provide their registers for this map, so if you are unable to find the data for a particular planning authority, please check their website.

Please note that the GLA is not responsible for any of the data on the map or register. All sites have been identified by the local planning authorities (not the GLA). Sites included on the register which have not received planning permission have not been endorsed by the GLA or the Mayor. Where Part 1 sites do not have planning permission, planning applications will still be required, which will need to be judged against Development Plan Policies. The presence of a site on a brownfield register does not alter any current planning designation or pre-empt the plan-making process.

Further information on the Brownfield registers can be found on MHCLG guidance pages.

Environmental Remediation Sites are areas being remediated under one of DEC's remedial programs, including State Superfund and Brownfield Cleanup. This database contains records of the sites which have been remediated or are being managed under by the agency. All sites listed on the "Registry of Inactive Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in New York State" are included in this database. The Database also includes the "Registry of Institutional and Engineering Controls in New York State". Each site record includes: Administrative information, including site name, classification, unique site code, site location, and site owner(s). Institutional and Engineering Controls implemented at the site. Wastes known or thought to be disposed at the site.

This dataset represents the locations, classifications, and physical characteristics of remediation activities carried out by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The locations represent leak clean up, emergency response, petroleum brownfields, non-petroleum brownfields (Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup), Superfund, RCRA, integrated remediation and site assessment sites.

The geodatabase, env_remediation_sites.gdb, contains two related datasets: (1) the remediation_sites point feature class, which has one record for each remediation site, and (2) the spatial_rem_activity table, which contains one record for each MPCA effort to investigate contamination at a site. The two datasets can be related using the ITEM_ID. In most cases, there will be one record in spatial_rem_activity for each record in remediation_sites. However, reopened leak sites may have multiple records in spatial_rem_activity for a single site, and CERCLIS/SEMS sites where the EPA was the lead agency may have zero records in spatial_rem_activity. The spatial_rem_activity table only exists in the file geodatabase format of this dataset.

Rapid global urbanization has made brownfield reuse a vital issue for sustainable urban development. However, the regeneration of brownfield landscapes is a complex and lengthy process that requires a combination of factors to be considered. Their landscape regeneration must be planned and prioritized to utilize brownfield sites and achieve positive social benefits. Therefore, an urgent need must be established to establish an assessment framework and system for various types of brownfield landscape regeneration dominant factors to find different brownfield landscape regeneration dominant factors. This research developed an assessment model using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), covering five brownfield types: industrial, mining, military, transportation, and landfill in Xi’an, China. The potential assessment factors in three levels were analyzed for weighting to explore the dominant factors for the potential regeneration of brownfield landscapes in Xi’an. The results showed that, firstly, among the five first-level assessment factors, the physicality factor was the most important. Secondly, among the 16 second-level factors, the spatial and physical features of the visual landscape were the most critical. Finally, among the 40 three-level factors, spatial features were the primary factor. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to provide a specific assessment system and data analysis methods and ideas for the dominant factors of urban brownfield landscape regeneration in China and other regions based on the assessment framework with strong adaptability proposed by the AHP method, which can be flexibly adapted in the different areas and countries, to realize the sustainable development of cities in various regions.

Rapid global urbanization has made brownfield reuse a vital issue for sustainable urban development. However, the regeneration of brownfield landscapes is a complex and lengthy process that requires a combination of factors to be considered. Their landscape regeneration must be planned and prioritized to utilize brownfield sites and achieve positive social benefits. Therefore, an urgent need must be established to establish an assessment framework and system for various types of brownfield landscape regeneration dominant factors to find different brownfield landscape regeneration dominant factors. This research developed an assessment model using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), covering five brownfield types: industrial, mining, military, transportation, and landfill in Xi’an, China. The potential assessment factors in three levels were analyzed for weighting to explore the dominant factors for the potential regeneration of brownfield landscapes in Xi’an. The results showed that, firstly, among the five first-level assessment factors, the physicality factor was the most important. Secondly, among the 16 second-level factors, the spatial and physical features of the visual landscape were the most critical. Finally, among the 40 three-level factors, spatial features were the primary factor. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to provide a specific assessment system and data analysis methods and ideas for the dominant factors of urban brownfield landscape regeneration in China and other regions based on the assessment framework with strong adaptability proposed by the AHP method, which can be flexibly adapted in the different areas and countries, to realize the sustainable development of cities in various regions.

Brownfields_BACI

   File Geodatabase Feature Class


   Thumbnail Not Available

   Tags

   Biophysical Resources, Air, Land, Water, BES, Brownfields, Pollution




   Summary


   BES Analysis


   Description


   Brownfield parcels in Baltimore City. No metadata was provided with this dataset; the UVM Spatial Analysis Lab has attempted to evaluate this dataset and generate metadata. This dataset appears to have a high degree of positional accuracy based on comparisons with high resolution imagery.


   Credits


   Maryland Department of the Environment


   Use limitations


   BES research only.


   Extent



   West -76.661468  East -76.530941 

   North 39.334224  South 39.235433 




   Scale Range

   There is no scale range for this item.

Brownfield parcels in Baltimore City. No metadata was provided with this dataset; the UVM Spatial Analysis Lab has attempted to evaluate this dataset and generate metadata. This dataset appears to have a high degree of positional accuracy based on comparisons with high resolution imagery. This is part of a collection of 221 Baltimore Ecosystem Study metadata records that point to a geodatabase. The geodatabase is available online and is considerably large. Upon request, and under certain arrangements, it can be shipped on media, such as a usb hard drive. The geodatabase is roughly 51.4 Gb in size, consisting of 4,914 files in 160 folders. Although this metadata record and the others like it are not rich with attributes, it is nonetheless made available because the data that it represents could be indeed useful. This is part of a collection of 221 Baltimore Ecosystem Study metadata records that point to a geodatabase. The geodatabase is available online and is considerably large. Upon request, and under certain arrangements, it can be shipped on media, such as a usb hard drive. The geodatabase is roughly 51.4 Gb in size, consisting of 4,914 files in 160 folders. Although this metadata record and the others like it are not rich with attributes, it is nonetheless made available because the data that it represents could be indeed useful.

Grants were awarded from April 2004 to March 2009. A total of 21 grants were awarded.To view more contamination data layers, see the RR Sites Map at https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/Brownfields/rrsm.html, or for specific site information search BRRTS on the Web at https://dnr.wi.gov/botw/SetUpBasicSearchForm.do

Also includes sites proposed for and deleted from the NPL, as well as Superfund Alternative Sites which are eligible for the NPL but are instead covered by an agreement for NPL-equivalent standards. Due to newer state cleanup programs, Wisconsin now adds few sites to the NPL.To view more contamination data layers, see the RR Sites Map at https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/Brownfields/rrsm.html, or for specific site information search BRRTS on the Web at https://dnr.wi.gov/botw/SetUpBasicSearchForm.do

Local authorities are required to conduct an annual survey of the housing land supply, the Housing Land Audit, to determine completions within the timeframe and update forecasts of the housing land supply. This, in turn, helps inform land releases within the Local Development Plan process and ongoing development management decisions. A five-year effective housing land supply is required at all times. This dataset contains full details - where available - of site references, completions and remaining supply. Further details of greenfield/brownfield status, tenure, effectiveness (deliverable within the period), constraints, planning details/status and developer are also provided where available. The datasets have been drawn from a variety of sources, including comprehensive regional datasets (ClydePlan) and the joining of spatial and tabular data. This includes allocated and planned sites, which typically have fuller details of forecast phasing (etc) and also 'windfall' and small sites (where included), which may be one-off rather than longer-term developments, with less detail. Some of these sites lack spatial geometry and have been represented by a square buffer on a recorded X/Y easting/northing, based on site size, if this information is available.