Feature comparison matrix of Google alternative search engines

OpenWeb Ninja's Google Images Data (Google SERP Data) API provides real-time image search capabilities for images sourced from all public sources on the web.

The API enables you to search and access more than 100 billion images from across the web including advanced filtering capabilities as supported by Google Advanced Image Search. The API provides Google Images Data (Google SERP Data) including details such as image URL, title, size information, thumbnail, source information, and more data points. The API supports advanced filtering and options such as file type, image color, usage rights, creation time, and more. In addition, any Advanced Google Search operators can be used with the API.

OpenWeb Ninja's Google Images Data & Google SERP Data API common use cases:

• Creative Media Production: Enhance digital content with a vast array of real-time images, ensuring engaging and brand-aligned visuals for blogs, social media, and advertising.

• AI Model Enhancement: Train and refine AI models with diverse, annotated images, improving object recognition and image classification accuracy.

• Trend Analysis: Identify emerging market trends and consumer preferences through real-time visual data, enabling proactive business decisions.

• Innovative Product Design: Inspire product innovation by exploring current design trends and competitor products, ensuring market-relevant offerings.

• Advanced Search Optimization: Improve search engines and applications with enriched image datasets, providing users with accurate, relevant, and visually appealing search results.

OpenWeb Ninja's Annotated Imagery Data & Google SERP Data Stats & Capabilities:

• 100B+ Images: Access an extensive database of over 100 billion images.

• Images Data from all Public Sources (Google SERP Data): Benefit from a comprehensive aggregation of image data from various public websites, ensuring a wide range of sources and perspectives.

• Extensive Search and Filtering Capabilities: Utilize advanced search operators and filters to refine image searches by file type, color, usage rights, creation time, and more, making it easy to find exactly what you need.

• Rich Data Points: Each image comes with more than 10 data points, including URL, title (annotation), size information, thumbnail, and source information, providing a detailed context for each image.

As of March 2025, Google represented 79.1 percent of the global online search engine market on desktop devices. Despite being much ahead of its competitors, this represents the lowest share ever recorded by the search engine in these devices for over two decades. Meanwhile, its long-time competitor Bing accounted for 12.21 percent, as tools like Yahoo and Yandex held shares of over 2.9 percent each. Google and the global search market Ever since the introduction of Google Search in 1997, the company has dominated the search engine market, while the shares of all other tools has been rather lopsided. The majority of Google revenues are generated through advertising. Its parent corporation, Alphabet, was one of the biggest internet companies worldwide as of 2024, with a market capitalization of 2.02 trillion U.S. dollars. The company has also expanded its services to mail, productivity tools, enterprise products, mobile devices, and other ventures. As a result, Google earned one of the highest tech company revenues in 2024 with roughly 348.16 billion U.S. dollars. Search engine usage in different countries Google is the most frequently used search engine worldwide. But in some countries, its alternatives are leading or competing with it to some extent. As of the last quarter of 2023, more than 63 percent of internet users in Russia used Yandex, whereas Google users represented little over 33 percent. Meanwhile, Baidu was the most used search engine in China, despite a strong decrease in the percentage of internet users in the country accessing it. In other countries, like Japan and Mexico, people tend to use Yahoo along with Google. By the end of 2024, nearly half of the respondents in Japan said that they had used Yahoo in the past four weeks. In the same year, over 21 percent of users in Mexico said they used Yahoo.

This description is part of the blog post "Systematic Literature Review of teaching Open Science" https://sozmethode.hypotheses.org/839

According to my opinion, we do not pay enough attention to teaching Open Science in higher education. Therefore, I designed a seminar to teach students the practices of Open Science by doing qualitative research.About this seminar, I wrote the article ”Teaching Open Science and qualitative methods“. For the article ”Teaching Open Science and qualitative methods“, I started to review the literature on ”Teaching Open Science“. The result of my literature review is that certain aspects of Open Science are used for teaching. However, Open Science with all its aspects (Open Access, Open Data, Open Methodology, Open Science Evaluation and Open Science Tools) is not an issue in publications about teaching.

Based on this insight, I have started a systematic literature review. I realized quickly that I need help to analyse and interpret the articles and to evaluate my preliminary findings. Especially different disciplinary cultures of teaching different aspects of Open Science are challenging, as I myself, as a social scientist, do not have enough insight to be able to interpret the results correctly. Therefore, I would like to invite you to participate in this research project!

I am now looking for people who would like to join a collaborative process to further explore and write the systematic literature review on “Teaching Open Science“. Because I want to turn this project into a Massive Open Online Paper (MOOP). According to the 10 rules of Tennant et al (2019) on MOOPs, it is crucial to find a core group that is enthusiastic about the topic. Therefore, I am looking for people who are interested in creating the structure of the paper and writing the paper together with me. I am also looking for people who want to search for and review literature or evaluate the literature I have already found. Together with the interested persons I would then define, the rules for the project (cf. Tennant et al. 2019). So if you are interested to contribute to the further search for articles and / or to enhance the interpretation and writing of results, please get in touch. For everyone interested to contribute, the list of articles collected so far is freely accessible at Zotero: https://www.zotero.org/groups/2359061/teaching_open_science. The figure shown below provides a first overview of my ongoing work. I created the figure with the free software yEd and uploaded the file to zenodo, so everyone can download and work with it:

To make transparent what I have done so far, I will first introduce what a systematic literature review is. Secondly, I describe the decisions I made to start with the systematic literature review. Third, I present the preliminary results.

Systematic literature review – an Introduction

Systematic literature reviews “are a method of mapping out areas of uncertainty, and identifying where little or no relevant research has been done.” (Petticrew/Roberts 2008: 2). Fink defines the systematic literature review as a “systemic, explicit, and reproducible method for identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the existing body of completed and recorded work produced by researchers, scholars, and practitioners.” (Fink 2019: 6). The aim of a systematic literature reviews is to surpass the subjectivity of a researchers’ search for literature. However, there can never be an objective selection of articles. This is because the researcher has for example already made a preselection by deciding about search strings, for example “Teaching Open Science”. In this respect, transparency is the core criteria for a high-quality review.

In order to achieve high quality and transparency, Fink (2019: 6-7) proposes the following seven steps:

1. Selecting a research question.
2. Selecting the bibliographic database.
3. Choosing the search terms.
4. Applying practical screening criteria.
5. Applying methodological screening criteria.
6. Doing the review.
7. Synthesizing the results.

I have adapted these steps for the “Teaching Open Science” systematic literature review. In the following, I will present the decisions I have made.

Systematic literature review – decisions I made

1. Research question: I am interested in the following research questions: How is Open Science taught in higher education? Is Open Science taught in its full range with all aspects like Open Access, Open Data, Open Methodology, Open Science Evaluation and Open Science Tools? Which aspects are taught? Are there disciplinary differences as to which aspects are taught and, if so, why are there such differences?
2. Databases: I started my search at the Directory of Open Science (DOAJ). “DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.” (https://doaj.org/) Secondly, I used the Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (base). Base is operated by Bielefeld University Library and “one of the world’s most voluminous search engines especially for academic web resources” (base-search.net). Both platforms are non-commercial and focus on Open Access publications and thus differ from the commercial publication databases, such as Web of Science and Scopus. For this project, I deliberately decided against commercial providers and the restriction of search in indexed journals. Thus, because my explicit aim was to find articles that are open in the context of Open Science.
3. Search terms: To identify articles about teaching Open Science I used the following search strings: “teaching open science” OR teaching “open science” OR teach „open science“. The topic search looked for the search strings in title, abstract and keywords of articles. Since these are very narrow search terms, I decided to broaden the method. I searched in the reference lists of all articles that appear from this search for further relevant literature. Using Google Scholar I checked which other authors cited the articles in the sample. If the so checked articles met my methodological criteria, I included them in the sample and looked through the reference lists and citations at Google Scholar. This process has not yet been completed.
4. Practical screening criteria: I have included English and German articles in the sample, as I speak these languages (articles in other languages are very welcome, if there are people who can interpret them!). In the sample only journal articles, articles in edited volumes, working papers and conference papers from proceedings were included. I checked whether the journals were predatory journals – such articles were not included. I did not include blogposts, books or articles from newspapers. I only included articles that fulltexts are accessible via my institution (University of Kassel). As a result, recently published articles at Elsevier could not be included because of the special situation in Germany regarding the Project DEAL (https://www.projekt-deal.de/about-deal/). For articles that are not freely accessible, I have checked whether there is an accessible version in a repository or whether preprint is available. If this was not the case, the article was not included. I started the analysis in May 2019.
5. Methodological criteria: The method described above to check the reference lists has the problem of subjectivity. Therefore, I hope that other people will be interested in this project and evaluate my decisions. I have used the following criteria as the basis for my decisions: First, the articles must focus on teaching. For example, this means that articles must describe how a course was designed and carried out. Second, at least one aspect of Open Science has to be addressed. The aspects can be very diverse (FOSS, repositories, wiki, data management, etc.) but have to comply with the principles of openness. This means, for example, I included an article when it deals with the use of FOSS in class and addresses the aspects of openness of FOSS. I did not include articles when the authors describe the use of a particular free and open source software for teaching but did not address the principles of openness or re-use.
6. Doing the review: Due to the methodical approach of going through the reference lists, it is possible to create a map of how the articles relate to each other. This results in thematic clusters and connections between clusters. The starting point for the map were four articles (Cook et al. 2018; Marsden, Thompson, and Plonsky 2017; Petras et al. 2015; Toelch and Ostwald 2018) that I found using the databases and criteria described above. I used yEd to generate the network. „yEd is a powerful desktop application that can be used to quickly and effectively generate high-quality diagrams.” (https://www.yworks.com/products/yed) In the network, arrows show, which articles are cited in an article and which articles are cited by others as well. In addition, I made an initial rough classification of the content using colours. This classification is based on the contents mentioned in the articles’ title and abstract. This rough content classification requires a more exact, i.e., content-based subdivision and

You can check the fields description in the documentation: current Keyword database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/keywords/?bash; Historical Keyword database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/history/keywords/?bash. You don’t have to download fresh data dumps in JSON or CSV – we can deliver data straight to your storage or database. We send terrabytes of data to dozens of customers every month using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, Eleasticsearch, and Google Big Query. Let us know if you’d like to get your data to any other storage or database.

Founded in 2007, Hippo is a leading provider of property insurance to homeowners, renters, and condo owners. As a company, Hippo prides itself on offering personalized coverage options that cater to the unique needs of its policyholders.

With a strong focus on customer-centricity, Hippo takes a closer approach to understanding the insurance needs of modern homeowners. The company's mission is to provide a seamless and hassle-free experience, making it one of the top choices for those seeking reliable property insurance solutions.

Welcome to APISCRAPY, where our comprehensive SERP Data solution reshapes your digital insights. SERP, or Search Engine Results Page, data is the pivotal information generated when users query search engines such as Google, Bing, Yahoo, Baidu, and more. Understanding SERP Data is paramount for effective digital marketing and SEO strategies.

Key Features:

Comprehensive Search Insights: APISCRAPY's SERP Data service delivers in-depth insights into search engine results across major platforms. From Google SERP Data to Bing Data and beyond, we provide a holistic view of your online presence.

Top Browser Compatibility: Our advanced techniques allow us to collect data from all major browsers, providing a comprehensive understanding of user behavior. Benefit from Google Data Scraping for enriched insights into user preferences, trends, and API-driven data scraping.

Real-time Updates: Stay ahead of online search trends with our real-time updates. APISCRAPY ensures you have the latest SERP Data to adapt your strategies and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

Use Cases:

SEO Optimization: Refine your SEO strategies with precision using APISCRAPY's SERP Data. Understand Google SERP Data and other key insights, monitor your search engine rankings, and optimize content for maximum visibility.

Competitor Analysis: Gain a competitive edge by analyzing competitor rankings and strategies across Google, Bing, and other search engines. Benchmark against industry leaders and fine-tune your approach.

Keyword Research: Unlock the power of effective keyword research with comprehensive insights from APISCRAPY's SERP Data. Target the right terms for your audience and enhance your SEO efforts.

Content Strategy Enhancement: Develop data-driven content strategies by understanding what resonates on search engines. Identify content gaps and opportunities to enhance your online presence and SEO performance.

Marketing Campaign Precision: Improve the precision of your marketing campaigns by aligning them with current search trends. APISCRAPY's SERP Data ensures that your campaigns resonate with your target audience.

Top Browsers Supported:

Google Chrome: Harness Google Data Scraping for enriched insights into user behavior, preferences, and trends. Leverage our API-driven data scraping to extract valuable information.

Mozilla Firefox: Explore Firefox user data for a deeper understanding of online search patterns and preferences. Benefit from our data scraping capabilities for Firefox to refine your digital strategies.

Safari: Utilize Safari browser data to refine your digital strategies and tailor your content to a diverse audience. APISCRAPY's data scraping ensures Safari insights contribute to your comprehensive analysis.

Microsoft Edge: Leverage Edge browser insights for comprehensive data that enhances your SEO and marketing efforts. With APISCRAPY's data scraping techniques, gain valuable API-driven insights for strategic decision-making.

Opera: Explore Opera browser data for a unique perspective on user trends. Our data scraping capabilities for Opera ensure you access a wealth of information for refining your digital strategies.

In summary, APISCRAPY's SERP Data solution empowers you with a diverse set of tools, from SERP API to Web Scraping, to unlock the full potential of online search trends. With top browser compatibility, real-time updates, and a comprehensive feature set, our solution is designed to elevate your digital strategies across various search engines. Stay ahead in the ever-evolving online landscape with APISCRAPY – where SEO Data, SERP API, and Web Scraping converge for unparalleled insights.

[ Related Tags: SERP Data, Google SERP Data, Google Data, Online Search, Trends Data, Search Engine Data, Bing Data, SERP Data, Google SERP Data, SEO Data, Keyword Data, SERP API, SERP Google API, SERP Web Scraping, Scrape All Search Engine Data, Web Search Data, Google Search API, Bing Search API, DuckDuckGo Search API, Yandex Search API, Baidu Search API, Yahoo Search API, Naver Search AP, SEO Data, Web Extraction Data, Web Scraping data, Google Trends Data ]

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Enterprise Search Engine market size will be USD 4358.2 million in 2024. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.70% from 2024 to 2031.

North America held the major market share for more than 40% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 1743.28 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.9% from 2024 to 2031.
Europe accounted for a market share of over 30% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 1307.46 million.
Asia Pacific held a market share of around 23% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 1002.39 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.7% from 2024 to 2031.
Latin America had a market share of more than 5% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 217.91 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.1% from 2024 to 2031.
Middle East and Africa had a market share of around 2% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 87.16 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.4% from 2024 to 2031.
The Solution category is the fastest growing segment of the Enterprise Search Engine industry

Market Dynamics of Enterprise Search Engine Market

Key Drivers for Enterprise Search Engine Market

Increasing Data Volume to Boost Market Growth

The increasing volume of data generated by organizations is a primary driver of the Enterprise Search Engine Market. As businesses accumulate vast amounts of structured and unstructured data from various sources—such as emails, documents, social media, and databases—the need for efficient retrieval and management becomes critical. Enterprise search engines enable organizations to sift through this data quickly, providing employees with timely access to information that can enhance decision-making and productivity. Additionally, the proliferation of big data technologies and cloud storage solutions contributes to data growth, necessitating robust search capabilities to ensure that valuable insights are not lost. This demand for streamlined access to comprehensive information continues to fuel the expansion of the enterprise search engine market. For instance, Google launched local search functionalities that were previewed earlier this year. These features enable users to explore their environment using their smartphone camera. Additionally, Google has added an option to search for restaurants by specific dishes and introduced new search capabilities within the Live View feature of Google Maps.

Increasing Demand for Data-Driven Decision-Making to Drive Market Growth

The rising demand for data-driven decision-making is significantly driving the Enterprise Search Engine Market. Organizations increasingly recognize the value of leveraging data analytics to inform strategic decisions, enhance operational efficiency, and improve customer experiences. As businesses strive to become more agile and responsive to market changes, they require quick access to relevant data across various departments and sources. Enterprise search engines facilitate this by enabling employees to efficiently retrieve and analyze critical information, thus supporting informed decision-making processes. Moreover, the integration of advanced analytics and artificial intelligence into enterprise search solutions further empowers organizations to derive actionable insights from their data. This trend towards a data-centric approach in business operations continues to propel the growth of the enterprise search engine market.

Restraint Factor for the Enterprise Search Engine Market

High Implementation Costs will Limit Market Growth

High implementation costs are a significant restraint on the growth of the Enterprise Search Engine Market. Deploying enterprise search solutions often involves substantial initial investments in software, hardware, and integration services. Organizations must consider expenses related to customizing the search engine to fit their unique data architectures and user needs. Additionally, ongoing maintenance, updates, and training for staff can contribute to overall costs, making it challenging for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets to adopt these systems. This financial barrier can hinder organizations from fully realizing the benefits of enterprise search engines, leading to under...

OpenStreetMap - The Map API

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Openstreetmap_logo.svg/100px-Openstreetmap_logo.svg.png" alt="">

Browsing our map is easy. Have a look around and see what you think of our coverage and detail. Over the years we've progressed quite spectacularly, achieving many mapping milestones. Individuals, governments and commercial companies have already begun putting this data to use, and in many countries, for many uses, OpenStreetMap is a viable alternative to other map providers. However the map isn't finished yet. The world is a big place. How does your neighbourhood look on OSM? There's lots of other ways to start using OpenStreetMap too.

Development

Extensive software development work is taking this project in many different directions. As mentioned above, we have created various map editing tools. In fact OpenStreetMap is powered by open-source software from its slippy map interface to the underlying data access API (a web service interface for reading and writing map data). There is opportunity for subprojects that work with or use our data, but we also need help fixing bugs and adding features to our core components.

Developers and translators are always welcome!

The OpenStreetMap Foundation

The OpenStreetMap Foundation is an organization that performs fund-raising. One major expense is acquiring and maintaining the servers that host the OpenStreetMap project. While the foundation supports the project, it does not control the project or "own" the OSM data. The foundation is dedicated to encouraging the growth, development and distribution of free geospatial data and to providing geospatial data for anyone to use and share.

Inspiration

I LOVE IT!

Learn the step-by-step process to start downloading the open data of the City of Mendoza. To access and download the open data of the City of Mendoza, you do not need to register or create a user account. Access to the repository is free, and all datasets can be downloaded free of charge and without restrictions. The homepage has access buttons to 14 data categories and a search engine where you can directly enter the topic you want to access. Each data category refers to a section of the platform where you will find the various datasets available, grouped by theme. As an example, if we enter the Security section, we find different datasets within. Once you enter the dataset, you will find a list of resources. Each of these resources is a file that contains the data. For example, the dataset Security Dependencies includes specific information about each of the dependencies and allows you to access the information published in different formats and download it. In this case, if you want to open the file with the Excel program, you must click on the download button of the second resource that specifies that the format is CSV. Likewise, in other sections, there are datasets with information in various formats, such as XLS and KMZ. Each of the datasets also contains a file with additional information where you can see the last update date, the update frequency, and which government area is generating this information, among other things. To access and download the open data of the City of Mendoza, you do not need to register or create a user account. Access to the repository is free, and all datasets can be downloaded free of charge and without restrictions. The homepage has access buttons to 14 data categories and a search engine where you can directly enter the topic you want to access. Each data category refers to a section of the platform where you will find the various datasets available, grouped by theme. As an example, if we enter the Security section, we find different datasets within. Once you enter the dataset, you will find a list of resources. Each of these resources is a file that contains the data. For example, the dataset Security Dependencies includes specific information about each of the dependencies and allows you to access the information published in different formats and download it. In this case, if you want to open the file with the Excel program, you must click on the download button of the second resource that specifies that the format is CSV. Likewise, in other sections, there are datasets with information in various formats, such as XLS and KMZ. Each of the datasets also contains a file with additional information where you can see the last update date, the update frequency, and which government area is generating this information, among other things. Translated from Spanish Original Text: Conocé el paso a paso para empezar a descargar los datos abiertos de la Ciudad de Mendoza. Para acceder y descargar los datos abiertos de la Ciudad de Mendoza, no necesitás realizar ningún tipo de registro ni crear un usuario. El acceso al repositorio es libre y todos los datasets se pueden descargar de manera gratuita y sin restricciones. La página de inicio cuenta con botones de acceso a 14 categorías de datos y un buscador en donde podés ingresar directamente al tema al que quieras acceder. Cada categoría de datos, refiere a una sección de la plataforma en donde vas a encontrar los distintos datasets disponibles agrupados por temática. A modo de ejemplo, si ingresamos en la sección Seguridad, dentro encontramos diferentes datasets. Una vez que ingresas al dataset, encontrarás una lista de recursos. Cada uno de estos recursos es un archivo que contiene los datos. Por ejemplo, el dataset Dependencias de Seguridad incluye información específica sobre cada una de las dependencias y te permite acceder a la información publicada en distintos formatos y descargarla. En este caso, si quieres abrir el archivo con el programa Excel deberás hacer clic sobre el botón descargar del segundo recurso que especifica que el formato es CSV. Así como también, en otras secciones hay datasets con la información en diversos formatos, como XLS y KMZ Cada uno de los datasets, contiene además una ficha con información adicional en donde podés ver la última fecha de actualización, la frecuencia de actualización y qué área de gobierno es la generadora de esta información, entre otros. Para acceder y descargar los datos abiertos de la Ciudad de Mendoza, no necesitás realizar ningún tipo de registro ni crear un usuario. El acceso al repositorio es libre y todos los datasets se pueden descargar de manera gratuita y sin restricciones. La página de inicio cuenta con botones de acceso a 14 categorías de datos y un buscador en donde podés ingresar directamente al tema al que quieras acceder. Cada categoría de datos, refiere a una sección de la plataforma en donde vas a encontrar los distintos datasets disponibles agrupados por temática. A modo de ejemplo, si ingresamos en la sección Seguridad, dentro encontramos diferentes datasets. Una vez que ingresas al dataset, encontrarás una lista de recursos. Cada uno de estos recursos es un archivo que contiene los datos. Por ejemplo, el dataset Dependencias de Seguridad incluye información específica sobre cada una de las dependencias y te permite acceder a la información publicada en distintos formatos y descargarla. En este caso, si quieres abrir el archivo con el programa Excel deberás hacer clic sobre el botón descargar del segundo recurso que especifica que el formato es CSV. Así como también, en otras secciones hay datasets con la información en diversos formatos, como XLS y KMZ Cada uno de los datasets, contiene además una ficha con información adicional en donde podés ver la última fecha de actualización, la frecuencia de actualización y qué área de gobierno es la generadora de esta información, entre otros.

Next Generation Search Engines Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Next Generation Search Engines market size reached USD 16.2 billion in 2024, with a robust year-on-year growth driven by rapid technological advancements and escalating demand for intelligent search solutions across industries. The market is expected to witness a CAGR of 18.7% during the forecast period from 2025 to 2033, propelling the market to a projected value of USD 82.3 billion by 2033. The accelerating adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and natural language processing (NLP) within search technologies is a key growth factor, as organizations seek more accurate, context-aware, and personalized information retrieval solutions.

One of the most significant growth drivers for the Next Generation Search Engines market is the exponential increase in digital content and data generation worldwide. Enterprises and consumers alike are producing vast amounts of unstructured data daily, from documents and emails to social media posts and multimedia files. Traditional search engines often struggle to deliver relevant results from such complex datasets. Next generation search engines, powered by AI and ML algorithms, are uniquely positioned to address this challenge by providing semantic understanding, contextual relevance, and intent-driven results. This capability is especially critical for industries like healthcare, BFSI, and e-commerce, where timely and precise information retrieval can directly impact decision-making, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction.

Another major factor fueling the growth of the Next Generation Search Engines market is the proliferation of mobile devices and the evolution of user interaction paradigms. As consumers increasingly rely on smartphones, tablets, and voice assistants, there is a growing demand for search solutions that support voice and visual queries, in addition to traditional text-based searches. Technologies such as voice search and visual search are gaining traction, enabling users to interact with search engines more naturally and intuitively. This shift is prompting enterprises to invest in advanced search platforms that can seamlessly integrate with diverse devices and channels, enhancing user engagement and accessibility. The integration of NLP further empowers these platforms to understand complex queries, colloquial language, and regional dialects, making search experiences more inclusive and effective.

Furthermore, the rise of enterprise digital transformation initiatives is accelerating the adoption of next generation search technologies across various sectors. Organizations are increasingly seeking to unlock the value of their internal data assets by deploying enterprise search solutions that can index, analyze, and retrieve information from multiple sources, including databases, intranets, cloud storage, and third-party applications. These advanced search engines not only improve knowledge management and collaboration but also support compliance, security, and data governance requirements. As businesses continue to embrace hybrid and remote work models, the need for efficient, secure, and scalable search capabilities becomes even more pronounced, driving sustained investment in this market.

Regionally, North America currently dominates the Next Generation Search Engines market, owing to the early adoption of AI-driven technologies, strong presence of leading technology vendors, and high digital literacy rates. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding internet penetration, and increasing investments in AI research and development. Europe is also witnessing steady growth, supported by robust regulatory frameworks and growing demand for advanced search solutions in sectors such as BFSI, healthcare, and education. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually catching up, as enterprises in these regions recognize the value of next generation search engines in enhancing operational efficiency and customer experience.

Snapshot img

Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Software Market Size 2025-2029

The search engine optimization (seo) software market size is forecast to increase by USD 40.05 billion, at a CAGR of 21.3% between 2024 and 2029.

The SEO Software Market is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing penetration of the Internet worldwide. The global digital transformation has led to an escalating demand for SEO solutions to optimize online presence and visibility. An additional key driver is the advent of advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, which are revolutionizing SEO by enhancing user experience and delivering more accurate and personalized search results. However, this market is not without challenges. Data privacy concerns among end-users pose a significant obstacle, as companies must ensure they comply with stringent regulations, such as GDPR and CCPA, while maintaining effective SEO strategies.
Balancing user privacy with search engine optimization requirements is a delicate challenge that demands innovative solutions and strategic planning. Companies seeking to capitalize on market opportunities and navigate these challenges effectively must stay informed of the latest trends and best practices in SEO and data privacy regulations.

What will be the Size of the Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Software Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The SEO software market continues to evolve, with new tools and techniques emerging to help businesses optimize their online presence. On-page optimization techniques, such as keyword difficulty scores and content strategy tools, remain essential for improving website performance. Local SEO optimization, website crawlability issues, and indexation monitoring tools are crucial for businesses targeting local markets and ensuring their websites are easily accessible to search engines. Content optimization features, data visualization tools, and image optimization techniques enable businesses to create engaging and optimized content for their audiences. AI-powered SEO tools, structured data validation, and SERP feature analysis offer insights into search engine behavior and user intent, providing valuable data for optimization strategies.

Backlink analysis software, website speed optimization, link building strategies, and video SEO strategies are essential for building a strong online presence and increasing visibility. Technical SEO capabilities, site audit functionalities, content promotion features, competitor SEO analysis, mobile SEO performance, conversion rate optimization, semantic keyword analysis, internal linking strategy, schema markup implementation, and keyword research tools are all critical components of a comprehensive SEO strategy. According to recent industry reports, the SEO software market is expected to grow by over 15% annually, reflecting the increasing importance of digital presence for businesses across sectors. For instance, a large e-commerce company reported a 20% increase in organic traffic after implementing a comprehensive SEO strategy using a combination of these tools and techniques.

How is this Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Software Industry segmented?

The search engine optimization (seo) software industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Deployment

  Cloud-based
  On-premises
  Hybrid


Product Type

  Desktop user
  Mobile user


Application

  Social media marketing
  Email marketing
  Content marketing


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    Italy
    Spain
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India
    Japan


  Rest of World (ROW)

By Deployment Insights

The cloud-based segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The cloud-based SEO software segment in the global market is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing preference for accessible, collaborative, and scalable solutions among professionals and teams. Cloud-based tools, such as Ahrefs, offer users the flexibility to access advanced SEO functionalities from any location with internet connectivity. This enables real-time collaboration, allowing team members to work together seamlessly on SEO projects, regardless of their physical proximity. The user experience of cloud-based SEO software is marked by its browser-based interfaces, ensuring a consistent and responsive experience across various devices. On-page optimization techniques, keyword difficulty scores, and local SEO optimization are essential features integrated into these tools.

Cont

Isobaric labeling-based proteomics is widely applied in deep proteome quantification. Among the platforms for isobaric labeled proteomic data analysis, the commercial software Proteome Discoverer (PD) is widely used, incorporating the search engine CHIMERYS, while FragPipe (FP) is relatively new, free for noncommercial purposes, and integrates the engine MSFragger. Here, we compared PD and FP over three public proteomic data sets labeled using 6plex, 10plex, and 16plex tandem mass tags. Our results showed the protein abundances generated by the two software are highly correlated. PD quantified more proteins (10.02%, 15.44%, 8.19%) than FP with comparable NA ratios (0.00% vs. 0.00%, 0.85% vs. 0.38%, and 11.74% vs. 10.52%) in the three data sets. Using the 16plex data set, PD and FP outputs showed high consistency in quantifying technical replicates, batch effects, and functional enrichment in differentially expressed proteins. However, FP saved 93.93%, 96.65%, and 96.41% of processing time compared to PD for analyzing the three data sets, respectively. In conclusion, while PD is a well-maintained commercial software integrating various additional functions and can quantify more proteins, FP is freely available and achieves similar output with a shorter computational time. Our results will guide users in choosing the most suitable quantification software for their needs.

Mercury is a Web-based system to search for metadata and retrieve associated data. Mercury incorporates a number of important features. Mercury * Invokes a new paradigm for managing dynamic distributed scientific data and metadata * Provide a single portal to information contained in disparate data management systems * Provide free text, fielded, spatial, and temporal search capabilities * Puts control in the hands of investigators or other data providers * Has a very light touch (i.e., is inexpensive to implement) * Is implemented using Internet standards, including XML * Supports international metadata standards, including FGDC, Dublin-Core, EML, ISO-19115 * Is compatible with Internet search engines * Is based on a combination of open source tools and ORNL-developed software The new Mercury system is based on open source and Service Oriented Architecture and provides multiple search services including: RSS, Geo-RSS, OpenSearch, Web Services and

Nowadays web portals play an essential role in searching and retrieving information in the several fields of knowledge: they are ever more technologically advanced and designed for supporting the storage of a huge amount of information in natural language originating from the queries launched by users worldwide.A good example is given by the WorldWideScience search engine:The database is available at . It is based on a similar gateway, Science.gov, which is the major path to U.S. government science information, as it pulls together Web-based resources from various agencies. The information in the database is intended to be of high quality and authority, as well as the most current available from the participating countries in the Alliance, so users will find that the results will be more refined than those from a general search of Google. It covers the fields of medicine, agriculture, the environment, and energy, as well as basic sciences. Most of the information may be obtained free of charge (the database itself may be used free of charge) and is considered ‘‘open domain.’’ As of this writing, there are about 60 countries participating in WorldWideScience.org, providing access to 50+databases and information portals. Not all content is in English. (Bronson, 2009)Given this scenario, we focused on building a corpus constituted by the query logs registered by the GreyGuide: Repository and Portal to Good Practices and Resources in Grey Literature and received by the WorldWideScience.org (The Global Science Gateway) portal: the aim is to retrieve information related to social media which as of today represent a considerable source of data more and more widely used for research ends.This project includes eight months of query logs registered between July 2017 and February 2018 for a total of 445,827 queries. The analysis mainly concentrates on the semantics of the queries received from the portal clients: it is a process of information retrieval from a rich digital catalogue whose language is dynamic, is evolving and follows – as well as reflects – the cultural changes of our modern society.

Mass spectrometry (MS) is a widely used proteome analysis tool for biomedical science. In an MS-based bottom-up proteomic approach to protein identification, sequence database (DB) searching has been routinely used because of its simplicity and convenience. However, searching a sequence DB with multiple variable modification options can increase processing time, false-positive errors in large and complicated MS data sets. Spectral library searching is an alternative solution, avoiding the limitations of sequence DB searching and allowing the detection of more peptides with high sensitivity. Unfortunately, this technique has less proteome coverage, resulting in limitations in the detection of novel and whole peptide sequences in biological samples. To solve these problems, we previously developed the “Combo-Spec Search” method, which uses manually multiple references and simulated spectral library searching to analyze whole proteomes in a biological sample. In this study, we have developed a new analytical interface tool called “Epsilon-Q” to enhance the functions of both the Combo-Spec Search method and label-free protein quantification. Epsilon-Q performs automatically multiple spectral library searching, class-specific false-discovery rate control, and result integration. It has a user-friendly graphical interface and demonstrates good performance in identifying and quantifying proteins by supporting standard MS data formats and spectrum-to-spectrum matching powered by SpectraST. Furthermore, when the Epsilon-Q interface is combined with the Combo-Spec search method, called the Epsilon-Q system, it shows a synergistic function by outperforming other sequence DB search engines for identifying and quantifying low-abundance proteins in biological samples. The Epsilon-Q system can be a versatile tool for comparative proteome analysis based on multiple spectral libraries and label-free quantification.

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis of Cell-Free DNA provides valuable insights into a spectrum of pathogenic species (particularly bacterial) in blood. Patients with Sepsis often face problems like delays in treatment regimens (combination or cocktail of antibiotics) due to the long turnaround time (TAT) of classical and standard blood culture procedures. NGS gives results with lower TAT along with high-depth coverage. The use of NGS may be a possible solution to deciding treatment regimens for patients without losing precious time and more accurately possibly saving lives.

Our curated dataset is of bacterial species or strains detected along with their genome size in 107 AML patients diagnosed with Sepsis clinically. Cell-free DNA profiles of patients were built and sequencing was done in Illumina (NovaSeq and NextSeq). Bioinformatic analysis was performed using two classification algorithms namely kraken2 and kaiju. For kraken2 based classification reference bacterial index developed by Carlo Ferravante et al (Zenodo 2020) (link: https://zenodo.org/records/4055180) was used, while for kaiju-based classification reference database named "nr_euk" dated "2023-05-10" (link: https://bioinformatics-centre.github.io/kaiju/downloads.html) was used.

Genome size annotation is important in metagenomics since for the use of depth of coverage (abundance), genome size is required. In metagenomic classification algorithms like kraken/kraken2 and kaiju output computes reads assigned only and not abundance. In kaiju, the problem is more complicated since the reference database does not have a fasta file but only an index file from which alignment is done.

To address the above challenges to compute "depth of coverage" or simply abundance, we build a Genome size annotator tool (https://github.com/patkarlab/Genome-Size-Annotation) which provides genome size for each species detected given its taxid is available. In this tool, the NCBI Datasets tool, NCBI Genome API check tool, and Data Mining from AI search engines like perplexity.ai are used.

We have curated two datasets

Kraken2 dataset named "FINAL METAGENOMIC DATA MASTERSHEET - kraken_genome_annotation"Kaiju dataset named "FINAL METAGENOMIC DATA MASTERSHEET - kaiju_genome_annotation"

*Please note that for kraken2 curated dataset, we used data mining from the AI search engine perplexity.ai while for kaiju we did not use perplexity, ai, and any species whose genome size was not found was labeled "NA"

You can analyze the Yelp's data the OpenWeb Ninja API provides to gain insights into the business world. This includes looking at market trends, identifying popular business categories, reading customer reviews and ratings, and understanding the factors that contribute to business success or failure.

The dataset includes all key business listings data & consumer review data:

Business Type, Description, Categories, Location, Consumer Review Data, Review Rating, Review Reactions, Review Author Information, Licenses, Highlights, and more!

The US Insight Engines Market Size Was Worth USD 16.58 Billion in 2023 and Is Expected To Reach USD 31.79 Billion by 2032, CAGR of 7.50%.

The Small Business Administration maintains the Dynamic Small Business Search (DSBS) database. As a small business registers in the System for Award Management, there is an opportunity to fill out the small business profile. The information provided populates DSBS. DSBS is another tool contracting officers use to identify potential small business contractors for upcoming contracting opportunities. Small businesses can also use DSBS to identify other small businesses for teaming and joint venturing.