This grouped layer of City of Seattle Parks contains Parks centroids, Parks Boundary outlines, Parks, and also Parks not owned by Seattle Parks and Recreation. Layers also available separately as hosted views:Parks Boundary CentroidsParks Boundary (outline)Parks Boundary (details)Parks Not SPRRefresh Cycle: Weekly on Mondays

Neighborhood Map Atlas neighborhoods are derived from the Seattle City Clerk's Office Geographic Indexing Atlas. These are the smallest neighborhood areas and have been supplemented with alternate names from other sources in 2020. They roll up to the district areas. The sub-neighborhood field contains the most common name and the alternate name field is a comma delimited list of all the alternate names.

City of Seattle municipal boundaries. Includes northerly and southerly boundaries for the city. The easterly and westerly boundaries of the city are defined by waterbodies.

This geospatial dataset was created by uploading a shapefile through the new import experience (DSMUI). The original shapefile is attached and was downloaded from https://data-seattlecitygis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/municipal-boundaries.

This generalized outline of Seattle contains the north and south city limits but extends past the shoreline and contains no internal waterbodies. For the traditional north south city limits, please use this layer, Seattle City Limits - Overview (arcgis.com) .

Speed Limit Map - From Hansen Asset Management System. Includes Speed Limit information for Seattle Streets. This map does not include data for WSDOT maintained roadways, private streets or other entities which maintain streets in Seattle. This map/data has been designed for reference use only. The City of Seattle is not responsible or liable for any inaccuracies contained in the derivative or misuse of this map/data. Speed limit data along city roads was obtained from the city's Hansen Asset Management System.This map is embedder on various SDOT pages like - https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/projects-and-programs/safety-first/vision-zero/speedlimitsInstant App Link: https://seattlecitygis.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=6d07f79dda07414ba12ee4e7986d964a| Contact: SDOT GIS Team | Contact Email: DOT_IT_GIS@seattle.gov

2020 census geography including tracts for the city of Seattle, King County, Washington. Excludes partial tracts with very small populations within the city limits along the southern border of the city.

Table from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series on education enrollment and attainment related topics for City of Seattle Council Districts, Comprehensive Plan Growth Areas and Community Reporting Areas. Table includes B14007/B14002 School Enrollment, B15003 Educational Attainment. Data is pulled from block group tables for the most recent ACS vintage and summarized to the neighborhoods based on block group assignment.

These boundaries reflect those used from 2013 - 2022. New boundaries were drawn in 2022 and will be used in 2023 elections. Symbolizes data from the featureclass CITYPLAN.CITYPLAN.council_districts_shc_2013 based on the the attribute "C_DISTRICT". Labels are based on the attribute Display Name.Be aware these are not the most current council district boundaries, to access the current data set, please use: Seattle City Council Districts

City of Seattle neighborhood boundaries with American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series data of frequently requested topics. Data is pulled from block group tables for the most recent ACS vintage and summarized to the neighborhoods based on block group assignment. Seattle neighborhood geography of Council Districts, Comprehensive Plan Growth Areas are included.The census block groups have been assigned to a neighborhood based on the distribution of the total population from the 2020 decennial census for the component census blocks. If the majority of the population in the block group were inside the boundaries of the neighborhood, the block group was assigned wholly to that neighborhood.Feature layer created for and used in the Neighborhood Profiles application.The attribute data associated with this map is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data and contains estimates and margins of error. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. <div style='font-family:"Avenir Next W01", "Avenir Next W00", "Avenir Next&qu

This layer reflects the district boundaries adopted by the Seattle Redistricting Commission in November 2022.Voters approved Charter Amendment 19 in the November 5, 2013 General And Special Election. The 2015 election was the first election conducted by district. In addition to the seven councilmembers from the districts there are two at-large positions. The voter-approved changes to the City Charter require that the redrawing process happen every ten years.For more information, please see Office of City Clerk site.

For use in SPU CIP App, as well as DotMaps.Data refreshed daily.

This data release contains the GIS data supporting U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report (OFR) 2005-1252, "The Geologic Map of Seattle—A Progress Report," published in 2005 by Kathy Goetz Troost, Derek B. Booth, Aaron P. Wisher, and Scott A. Shimel (https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20051252). The OFR was prepared for the 2005 Washington Hydrogeology Symposium and describes the status of geologic mapping for Seattle, Washington, at the time. The map is the result of field mapping and compilation of subsurface geologic data during the years 1999–2004 and was funded by the City of Seattle and the U.S. Geological Survey. Data from more than 36,000 exploration points, geotechnical borings, monitoring wells, excavations, and outcrops were used in making the map. The northern part of the 2005 OFR and the supporting GIS data were subsequently published as two geologic maps: Booth, D.B., Troost, K.G., and Shimel, S.A., 2005, Geologic map of northwestern Seattle (part of the Seattle North 7.5’ X 15’ Quadrangle), King County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2903, https://doi.org/10.3133/sim2903. Booth, D.B., Troost, K.G., and Shimel, S.A., 2009, Geologic map of northeastern Seattle (part of the Seattle North 7.5' x 15' quadrangle), King County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3065, https://doi.org/10.3133/sim3065. The southern part of the 2005 OFR and the supporting GIS data were not subsequently published for various reasons. With the original authors' permission, the GIS data used to create the map shown in OFR 2005-1252 are being released here to best meet modern open-data standards and to allow for use in future studies and mapping. The data included in this data release are only those components necessary to create the map shown in OFR 2005-1252. The following map features were not available and are not included in this data release: bedding point data, faults, anticlines, and contact lines. OFR_2005-1252.gdb is an Esri geodatabase containing the following feature classes: ofr_2005_1252_geology_poly (1,068 features); ofr_2005_1252_fill_poly (424 features); ofr_2005_1252_seattle_fault_zone_poly (1 feature); ofr_2005_1252_wastage_landslide_deposits_poly (188 features); ofr_2005_1252_beds_line (6 features); and ofr_2005_1252_scarp_line (351 features). Metadata records associated with each of these elements contain more detailed descriptions of their purposes, constituent entities, and attributes. A shapefile (non-geodatabase) version of the dataset is also included, although due to character limits, some field names and text cells in the attribute tables were truncated relative to the equivalent values in the geodatabase. The authors ask that users of the geologic map data cite both the open-file report and the GIS data release: Open-File Report: Troost, K.G., Booth, D.B., Wisher, A.P., and Shimel, S.A., 2005, The geologic map of Seattle—a progress report: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1252, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20051252. GIS data: Troost, K.G., Booth, D.B., Wisher, A.P., and Shimel, S.A., 2024, GIS data for U.S. Geological Survey OFR 2005-1252, The geologic map of Seattle—a progress report: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P93L6SPS.

This polygon feature contains geopolitical areas and is used to store geographic and attribute information describing the geographic extent of a political governance area or civil area, referred to in US OMB Circular A-16 as governmental units. The data was compiled from existing data sources and updated as needed by the city of SeaTac using available information.Incorporated in February 1990, the City of SeaTac is located in the Pacific Northwest, approximately midway between the cities of Seattle and Tacoma in the State of Washington. SeaTac is a vibrant community, economically strong, environmentally sensitive, and people-oriented. The City boundaries surround the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, (approximately 3 square miles in area) which is owned and operated by the Port of Seattle. For additional information regarding the City of SeaTac, its people, or services, please visit https://www.seatacwa.gov. For additional information regarding City GIS data or maps, please visit https://www.seatacwa.gov/our-city/maps-and-gis.

Peat-settlement-prone areas (sites containing peat and organic soils that may settle when the area is developed or the water table is lowered).Peat settlement-prone areas. Peat settlement-prone areas consist of Category I and Category II peat settlement-prone areas that are delineated on Maps A1 through A26, Peat Settlement-prone Area Boundaries Maps, codified at the end of this Chapter 25.09. This parcel-specific delineation is based on the location of the relevant bog or bogs identified in City of Seattle Identified Bogs (Troost 2007) plus a buffer of 50 feet for Category I peat settlement-prone areas or a buffer of 25 feet for Category II peat settlement-prone areas. On parcels larger than 50,000 square feet, the Director may consider a parcel-specific delineation, provided by the applicant, of the peat settlement-prone area boundary on a parcel. Where a parcel-specific delineation conflicts with the Peat Settlement-prone Area Boundaries Maps, the parcel-specific delineation shall apply.For more information about the definition of peat settlement prone areas, see Seattle Municipal Code section 25.09.012, Environmentally Critical Areas (ECA) definitions.Updated as needed.

This data layer references data from a high-resolution tree canopy change-detection layer for Seattle, Washington. Tree canopy change was mapped by using remotely sensed data from two time periods (2016 and 2021). Tree canopy was assigned to three classes: 1) no change, 2) gain, and 3) loss. No change represents tree canopy that remained the same from one time period to the next. Gain represents tree canopy that increased or was newly added, from one time period to the next. Loss represents the tree canopy that was removed from one time period to the next. Mapping was carried out using an approach that integrated automated feature extraction with manual edits. Care was taken to ensure that changes to the tree canopy were due to actual change in the land cover as opposed to differences in the remotely sensed data stemming from lighting conditions or image parallax. Direct comparison was possible because land-cover maps from both time periods were created using object-based image analysis (OBIA) and included similar source datasets (LiDAR-derived surface models, multispectral imagery, and thematic GIS inputs). OBIA systems work by grouping pixels into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial properties, while taking into account boundaries imposed by existing vector datasets. Within the OBIA environment a rule-based expert system was designed to effectively mimic the process of manual image analysis by incorporating the elements of image interpretation (color/tone, texture, pattern, _location, size, and shape) into the classification process. A series of morphological procedures were employed to insure that the end product is both accurate and cartographically pleasing. No accuracy assessment was conducted, but the dataset was subjected to manual review and correction.University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Laboratory in collaboration with City of Seattle.This dataset consists of City of Seattle Topo Basins areas which cover the following tree canopy categories: Existing tree canopy percent Possible tree canopy - vegetation percent Relative percent change Absolute percent changeFor more information, please see the 2021 Tree Canopy Assessment.

This map package references data from a high-resolution tree canopy change-detection layer for Seattle, Washington. Tree canopy change was mapped by using remotely sensed data from two time periods (2016 and 2021). Tree canopy was assigned to three classes: 1) no change, 2) gain, and 3) loss. No change represents tree canopy that remained the same from one time period to the next. Gain represents tree canopy that increased or was newly added, from one time period to the next. Loss represents the tree canopy that was removed from one time period to the next. Mapping was carried out using an approach that integrated automated feature extraction with manual edits. Care was taken to ensure that changes to the tree canopy were due to actual change in the land cover as opposed to differences in the remotely sensed data stemming from lighting conditions or image parallax. Direct comparison was possible because land-cover maps from both time periods were created using object-based image analysis (OBIA) and included similar source datasets (LiDAR-derived surface models, multispectral imagery, and thematic GIS inputs). OBIA systems work by grouping pixels into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial properties, while taking into account boundaries imposed by existing vector datasets. Within the OBIA environment a rule-based expert system was designed to effectively mimic the process of manual image analysis by incorporating the elements of image interpretation (color/tone, texture, pattern, location, size, and shape) into the classification process. A series of morphological procedures were employed to ensure that the end product is both accurate and cartographically pleasing. No accuracy assessment was conducted, but the dataset was subjected to manual review and correction.University of Vermont Spatial Analysis LaboratoryThis map package consists of tree canopy data covering the following categories:50-acre HexagonsCouncil DistrictsSDOT Urban Forestry Management UnitsManagement Units - Dissolved with ROWParcels Right of WayBlock GroupsRSE Census TractsPublic SchoolsBasinsFor more information, please see the 2021 Tree Canopy Assessment.

Table from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series on disabilities and health insurance related topics for City of Seattle Council Districts, Comprehensive Plan Growth Areas and Community Reporting Areas. Table includes C21007 Age by Veteran Status by Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months by Disability Status, B27010 Types of Health Insurance Coverage by Age, B22010 Receipt of Food Stamps/SNAP by Disability Status for Households. Data is pulled from block group tables for the most recent ACS vintage and summarized to the neighborhoods based on block group assignment.

This data layer references data from a high-resolution tree canopy change-detection layer for Seattle, Washington. Tree canopy change was mapped by using remotely sensed data from two time periods (2016 and 2021). Tree canopy was assigned to three classes: 1) no change, 2) gain, and 3) loss. No change represents tree canopy that remained the same from one time period to the next. Gain represents tree canopy that increased or was newly added, from one time period to the next. Loss represents the tree canopy that was removed from one time period to the next. Mapping was carried out using an approach that integrated automated feature extraction with manual edits. Care was taken to ensure that changes to the tree canopy were due to actual change in the land cover as opposed to differences in the remotely sensed data stemming from lighting conditions or image parallax. Direct comparison was possible because land-cover maps from both time periods were created using object-based image analysis (OBIA) and included similar source datasets (LiDAR-derived surface models, multispectral imagery, and thematic GIS inputs). OBIA systems work by grouping pixels into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial properties, while taking into account boundaries imposed by existing vector datasets. Within the OBIA environment a rule-based expert system was designed to effectively mimic the process of manual image analysis by incorporating the elements of image interpretation (color/tone, texture, pattern, location, size, and shape) into the classification process. A series of morphological procedures were employed to ensure that the end product is both accurate and cartographically pleasing. No accuracy assessment was conducted, but the dataset was subjected to manual review and correction.University of Vermont Spatial Analysis LaboratoryThis dataset consists of City of Seattle Public Schools areas which cover the following tree canopy categories:Existing tree canopy percentPossible tree canopy - vegetation percentRelative percent changeAbsolute percent changeFor more information, please see the 2021 Tree Canopy Assessment.