Records from operating a customer call center or service center providing services to the public. Services may address a wide variety of topics such as understanding agency mission-specific functions or how to resolve technical difficulties with external-facing systems or programs. Includes:rn- incoming requests and responsesrn- trouble tickets and tracking logs rn- recordings of call center phone conversations with customers used for quality control and customer service trainingrn- system data, including customer ticket numbers and visit tracking rn- evaluations and feedback about customer servicesrn- information about customer services, such as “Frequently Asked Questions” (FAQs) and user guidesrn- reports generated from customer management datarn- complaints and commendation records; customer feedback and satisfaction surveys, including survey instruments, data, background materials, and reports.

Note: This dataset was deprecated effective April 30, 2025. Please refer to the Calls for Service (Consolidated) dataset for current data and access to historical records, including prior reporting years.Archive of Calls for Service data from 2012 to 2019 provided as a single source. Staging for sub-layers for specified time periods.

The Network As A Service Market Report is Segmented by Type (LAN-As-A-Service, WAN-As-A-Service, and More), Application (Virtual CPE (vCPE), Bandwidth-On-Demand (BoD), and More), Organization Size (Large Enterprises and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)), Industry Vertical (IT and Telecom, BFSI, Healthcare, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

The global Security as a Service (SECaaS) market was valued approximately ****** billion U.S. dollars in 2022 and expected to exceed ** billion U.S. dollars in 2023. The SECaaS market is forecast to continue growing throughout the coming years and projected to reach more than ** billion U.S. dollars by 2032. As businesses continuously migrate their data to the cloud and improve their information technology infrastructure, the related threats to their data also increase. For this reason, security solutions are high in demand to ensure data security.

Service Delivered measures the percentage of scheduled trains that are actually provided during peak hours on weekdays (7 AM to 10 AM and 4 PM to 7 PM) and weekends (10 AM to 6 PM) for a given month.

The majority of Japanese consumers in Japan, more than ** percent, have not used a recurring service recently, as revealed in a survey conducted in January 2025. The most commonly used subscription service was of the flat-rate model, which allows unlimited-use of online services and digital content as long as it remains within service terms.

Terms of UseData Limitations and DisclaimerThe user’s use of and/or reliance on the information contained in the Document shall be at the user’s own risk and expense. MassDEP disclaims any responsibility for any loss or harm that may result to the user of this data or to any other person due to the user’s use of the Document.This is an ongoing data development project. Attempts have been made to contact all PWS systems, but not all have responded with information on their service area. MassDEP will continue to collect and verify this information. Some PWS service areas included in this datalayer have not been verified by the PWS or the municipality involved, but since many of those areas are based on information published online by the municipality, the PWS, or in a publicly available report, they are included in the estimated PWS service area datalayer.Please note: All PWS service area delineations are estimates for broad planning purposes and should only be used as a guide. The data is not appropriate for site-specific or parcel-specific analysis. Not all properties within a PWS service area are necessarily served by the system, and some properties outside the mapped service areas could be served by the PWS – please contact the relevant PWS. Not all service areas have been confirmed by the systems.Please use the following citation to reference these data:MassDEP, Water Utility Resilience Program. 2025. Community and Non-Transient Non-Community Public Water System Service Area (PubV2025_3).IMPORTANT NOTICE: This MassDEP Estimated Water Service datalayer may not be complete, may contain errors, omissions, and other inaccuracies and the data are subject to change. This version is published through MassGIS. We want to learn about the data uses. If you use this dataset, please notify staff in the Water Utility Resilience Program (WURP@mass.gov).This GIS datalayer represents approximate service areas for Public Water Systems (PWS) in Massachusetts. In 2017, as part of its “Enhancing Resilience and Emergency Preparedness of Water Utilities through Improved Mapping” (Critical Infrastructure Mapping Project ), the MassDEP Water Utility Resilience Program (WURP) began to uniformly map drinking water service areas throughout Massachusetts using information collected from various sources. Along with confirming existing public water system (PWS) service area information, the project collected and verified estimated service area delineations for PWSs not previously delineated and will continue to update the information contained in the datalayers. As of the date of publication, WURP has delineated Community (COM) and Non-Transient Non-Community (NTNC) service areas. Transient non-community (TNCs) are not part of this mapping project.Layers and Tables:The MassDEP Estimated Public Water System Service Area data comprises two polygon feature classes and a supporting table. Some data fields are populated from the MassDEP Drinking Water Program’s Water Quality Testing System (WQTS) and Annual Statistical Reports (ASR).The Community Water Service Areas feature class (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_COMM_POLY) includes polygon features that represent the approximate service areas for PWS classified as Community systems.The NTNC Water Service Areas feature class (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_NTNC_POLY) includes polygon features that represent the approximate service areas for PWS classified as Non-Transient Non-Community systems.The Unlocated Sites List table (PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_USL) contains a list of known, unmapped active Community and NTNC PWS services areas at the time of publication.ProductionData UniversePublic Water Systems in Massachusetts are permitted and regulated through the MassDEP Drinking Water Program. The WURP has mapped service areas for all active and inactive municipal and non-municipal Community PWSs in MassDEP’s Water Quality Testing Database (WQTS). Community PWS refers to a public water system that serves at least 15 service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents.All active and inactive NTNC PWS were also mapped using information contained in WQTS. An NTNC or Non-transient Non-community Water System refers to a public water system that is not a community water system and that has at least 15 service connections or regularly serves at least 25 of the same persons or more approximately four or more hours per day, four or more days per week, more than six months or 180 days per year, such as a workplace providing water to its employees.These data may include declassified PWSs. Staff will work to rectify the status/water services to properties previously served by declassified PWSs and remove or incorporate these service areas as needed.Maps of service areas for these systems were collected from various online and MassDEP sources to create service areas digitally in GIS. Every PWS is assigned a unique PWSID by MassDEP that incorporates the municipal ID of the municipality it serves (or the largest municipality it serves if it serves multiple municipalities). Some municipalities contain more than one PWS, but each PWS has a unique PWSID. The Estimated PWS Service Area datalayer, therefore, contains polygons with a unique PWSID for each PWS service area.A service area for a community PWS may serve all of one municipality (e.g. Watertown Water Department), multiple municipalities (e.g. Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works), all or portions of two or more municipalities (e.g. Provincetown Water Dept which serves all of Provincetown and a portion of Truro), or a portion of a municipality (e.g. Hyannis Water System, which is one of four PWSs in the town of Barnstable).Some service areas have not been mapped but their general location is represented by a small circle which serves as a placeholder. The location of these circles are estimates based on the general location of the source wells or the general estimated location of the service area - these do not represent the actual service area.Service areas were mapped initially from 2017 to 2022 and reflect varying years for which service is implemented for that service area boundary. WURP maintains the dataset quarterly with annual data updates; however, the dataset may not include all current active PWSs. A list of unmapped PWS systems is included in the USL table PWS_WATER_SERVICE_AREA_USL available for download with the dataset. Some PWSs that are not mapped may have come online after this iteration of the mapping project; these will be reconciled and mapped during the next phase of the WURP project. PWS IDs that represent regional or joint boards with (e.g. Tri Town Water Board, Randolph/Holbrook Water Board, Upper Cape Regional Water Cooperative) will not be mapped because their individual municipal service areas are included in this datalayer.PWSs that do not have corresponding sources, may be part of consecutive systems, may have been incorporated into another PWSs, reclassified as a different type of PWS, or otherwise taken offline. PWSs that have been incorporated, reclassified, or taken offline will be reconciled during the next data update.Methodologies and Data SourcesSeveral methodologies were used to create service area boundaries using various sources, including data received from the systems in response to requests for information from the MassDEP WURP project, information on file at MassDEP, and service area maps found online at municipal and PWS websites. When provided with water line data rather than generalized areas, 300-foot buffers were created around the water lines to denote service areas and then edited to incorporate generalizations. Some municipalities submitted parcel data or address information to be used in delineating service areas.Verification ProcessSmall-scale PDF file maps with roads and other infrastructure were sent to every PWS for corrections or verifications. For small systems, such as a condominium complex or residential school, the relevant parcels were often used as the basis for the delineated service area. In towns where 97% or more of their population is served by the PWS and no other service area delineation was available, the town boundary was used as the service area boundary. Some towns responded to the request for information or verification of service areas by stating that the town boundary should be used since all or nearly all of the municipality is served by the PWS.Sources of information for estimated drinking water service areasThe following information was used to develop estimated drinking water service areas:EOEEA Water Assets Project (2005) water lines (these were buffered to create service areas)Horsely Witten Report 2008Municipal Master Plans, Open Space Plans, Facilities Plans, Water Supply System Webpages, reports and online interactive mapsGIS data received from PWSDetailed infrastructure mapping completed through the MassDEP WURP Critical Infrastructure InitiativeIn the absence of other service area information, for municipalities served by a town-wide water system serving at least 97% of the population, the municipality’s boundary was used. Determinations of which municipalities are 97% or more served by the PWS were made based on the Percent Water Service Map created in 2018 by MassDEP based on various sources of information including but not limited to:The Winter population served submitted by the PWS in the ASR submittalThe number of services from WQTS as a percent of developed parcelsTaken directly from a Master Plan, Water Department Website, Open Space Plan, etc. found onlineCalculated using information from the town on the population servedMassDEP staff estimateHorsely Witten Report 2008Calculation based on Water System Areas Mapped through MassDEP WURP Critical Infrastructure Initiative, 2017-2022Information found in publicly available PWS planning documents submitted to MassDEP or as part of infrastructure planningMaintenanceThe

Field Service Management Market is Segmented by Deployment Type (On-Premise, Cloud), Organization Size (Large Enterprises, Small and Medium Enterprises), FSM Solution and Service Type (Solutions, Services), End-User Vertical (Facilities Management (Hard-FM and Soft-FM), IT and Telecom, and More), Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Graph and download economic data for Household Debt Service Payments as a Percent of Disposable Personal Income (TDSP) from Q1 1980 to Q1 2025 about disposable, payments, debt, personal income, percent, personal, households, services, income, and USA.

The global device-as-a-service market size was valued at USD 123.18 Billion in 2024. Looking forward, IMARC Group estimates the market to reach USD 1,141.02 Billion by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of 28.06% during 2025-2033. North America currently dominates the market, holding a significant market share of over 35.0% in 2024. The increasing demand for remote work access, growth of cloud computing, and rise of bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies represent some of the factors driving the market.

Report Attribute	Key Statistics
Base Year	2024
Forecast Years	2025-2033
Historical Years	2019-2024
Market Size in 2024	USD 123.18 Billion
Market Forecast in 2033	USD 1,141.02 Billion
Market Growth Rate (2025-2033)	28.06%

IMARC Group provides an analysis of the key trends in each segment of the global device-as-a-service market report, along with forecasts at the global, regional, and country levels for 2025-2033. Our report has categorized the market based on offering, enterprise size and end use.

In 2024, the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) market was worth around *** billion U.S. dollars. IaaS is a computing infrastructure that is provisioned and managed over the internet by a cloud provider. IaaS delivers fundamental network, compute, and storage resources to customers on demand. This model reduces the need for an owned infrastructure that is difficult and expensive to maintain.

The global captioning service market size was valued at USD 8.4 billion in 2021 and is projected to grow from USD 10.5 billion in 2023 to USD 22.3 billion by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of 9.3% during the forecast period (2023-2033). The market growth can be attributed to the rising demand for accessibility services, increasing adoption of video content, and growing awareness about the importance of captioning for inclusion. Government regulations mandating captioning for media content and a shift towards online learning and remote work have also contributed to the market's expansion. The market is segmented based on application into media & entertainment, education, government, corporate, and others. Media & entertainment holds the largest market share due to the widespread use of captioning in movies, TV shows, and online videos. Education is another significant segment, as captioning is essential for deaf and hard of hearing students to access educational content. The corporate segment is growing rapidly due to the increasing use of captioning in online meetings, webinars, and other corporate communications. Key players in the market include Verbit, IBM, Digital Nirvana, ZOO Digital Group, Ai-Media Technologies, Rev, NHK Global Media Services, 3Play Media, Telestream, ENCO Systems, Inc., Apptek, Capital Captions, VoiceBox, Acadecraft, Fujimic Inc., Japan Media Services, Forecross, CCJK Technologies, and Lisan India.

The Calls for Service dataset includes police service requests for which patrol officers, traffic officers, bike officers and, on occasion, detectives will be dispatched to public safety response. It also includes self-initiated calls for service where an officer witnesses a violation or suspicious activity for which they would respond. This item represents a consolidated item of all records.Why the Datasets are Organized into Separate Layers In January of 2022, the Tempe Police Department completed a major transition in how crimes data is reported, moving from the FBI Uniform Crime Report program to the enhanced National-Incident Based Reporting System, or NIBRS. NIBRS is now the required reporting method for the FBI. The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) Program's traditional Summary Reporting System (SRS) was limited in comparison to NIBRS, which offers more detailed data collection that provides a deeper understanding of crime and its circumstances. NIBRS captures a wider range of details on crime incidents and can reflect separate offenses occurring during the same event, including information on victims, known offenders, relationships between victims and offenders, arrestees, and property involved in the crimes. With greater specificity in reporting offenses, NIBRS provides for more accurate and detailed crime-related information, and helps give context to specific crime issues while affording greater analytic capability of crime. Below is the link to Tempe-specific NIBRS reports. Use the drop-down filters to select Tempe PD, the year, and the type of report. Because of these differences, trends and numbers between the two systems should not be directly compared. That’s why we treat 2022 and later (NIBRS) separately from 2021 and earlier (UCR). To make the older data easier to browse, we grouped the data from 2021 and earlier into year ranges instead of showing it all at once. This helps with performance and loading speed due to the large count of records. Additional InformationContact Email: PD_DataRequest@tempe.govContact Phone: N/ALink: N/AData Source: Versaterm Informix RMSData Source Type: Informix and/or SQL ServerPreparation Method: Automated processPublish Frequency: DailyPublish Method: AutomaticData Dictionary

A five-tier system that categorizes all roads in the county road system. Tier 1 roadways are primarily principal arterials and lifeline routes that serve the greatest number of users (highest priority), while Tier 5 roadways are local roads that do not provide the sole access for people to get to their homes (lowest priority).

Travel services (% of commercial service exports) in Germany was reported at 8.616 % in 2024, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. Germany - Travel services (% of commercial service exports) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on July of 2025.

This dataset tracks annual diversity score from 2004 to 2023 for High School For Public Service-heroes Of Tomorrow vs. New York and New York City Geographic District #17 School District

U.S. Home Services Market size was valued at USD 211.71 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 893.18 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 19.59% from 2024 to 2031.

U.S. Home Services Market Overview

The U.S. Home Services Market is poised for continued growth, driven by a combination of evolving consumer preferences, technological advancements, and demographic trends. A key driver of this market is the increasing demand for home maintenance and improvements. With homeownership rates on the rise, particularly among millennials and baby boomers, more individuals are investing in home repairs, remodeling, and upgrades to enhance comfort, functionality, and property value. The aging housing stock in the U.S. also contributes significantly to this demand, as older homes require frequent repairs and updates to meet modern standards and codes.

This is particularly true in regions with older infrastructure, where demand for plumbing, electrical, and HVAC services remains high. One of the most influential trends in the U.S. Home Services Market is the shift toward digitalization and online platforms. As consumers become more tech-savvy, they are increasingly turning to mobile apps and online marketplaces to find, compare, and schedule home services. This has not only improved accessibility and convenience for homeowners but also allowed service providers to reach new audiences.

Market Size statistics on the Food Service Contractors industry in United States

Market Overview The global same-day delivery service market is poised for significant growth, with a market size of 80,160 million valued in 2025 and projected to reach 251,249 million by 2033 at a CAGR of 18.1%. The demand for fast and convenient delivery is driven by the rise of e-commerce, urbanization, and consumer expectations for instant gratification. The COVID-19 pandemic has further accelerated the adoption of same-day delivery as consumers opt for hassle-free and contactless shopping experiences. Market Segments and Competitive Landscape The same-day delivery service market is segmented into B2B and B2C types, with B2C dominating the market share due to increased demand from individual consumers. The market also encompasses various application segments, including food, consumer goods, and others. Key market players include A-1 Express, DHL, FedEx, UPS, GOGOX, and American Expediting, among others. These companies are constantly innovating and expanding their service offerings to meet the evolving needs of consumers and businesses. Furthermore, regional variations exist in market dynamics, with North America and Asia-Pacific expected to be key growth markets due to their large e-commerce sectors and high population density.

The global hosting infrastructure services market is expected to hold a valuation of US$ 16 billion in 2023 and rise at a high CAGR of 8.5% to top a net worth of US$ 36.1 billion by the end of 2033.

Report Attributes	Details
Hosting Infrastructure Services Market Size (2023)	US$ 16 billion
Predicted Revenue (2033)	US$ 36.1 billion
Global Market Growth Rate (2023 to 2033)	8.5% CAGR
Regional Market with Highest Share	North America - 31%

Report Scope

Attributes	Details
Forecast Period	2023 to 2033
Historical Data Available for	2018 to 2022
Market Analysis	US$ Million for Value
Key Regions Covered	North America Latin America Western Europe Eastern Europe South Asia & Pacific East Asia Middle East & Africa
Key Countries Covered	United States Canada Brazil Mexico Germany United Kingdom France Spain Italy Poland Russia Czech Republic Romania India Bangladesh Australia New Zealand China Japan South Korea GCC Countries South Africa Israel
Key Market Segments Covered	Deployment Type Service Enterprise Type Vertical Cloud Service Type Region
Key Companies Profiled	HPE Development LP AT&T Inc. Level 3 Communications CenturyLink Inc. Microsoft Corporation Colt Technology Services Group Limited NetApp Inc. Equinix Inc. CoreSite Realty Corporation Google Inc. IBM Corporation Internap Network Services Corporation Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP Rackspace Inc. Sungard Availability Services Zayo Group Holdings Inc.
Customization & Pricing	Available upon Request